SES Water WRMP19 Non-household consumption forecast

Similar documents
Report Overview Vietnam Hotel Survey 2013

US Spa Industry Study

3. Aviation Activity Forecasts

OUTLOOK EAST LEPPINGTON

Domestic Tourism in Small Towns

Accommodation Survey: November 2009

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

The impact of investments & storms on the economic benefits provided by the South West Coast Path National Trail to the region between 2010 and 2014

Visit Wales Research Update

Data Digest: Florida. August 2013

Economic Impact of Kalamazoo-Battle Creek International Airport

CAA Passenger Survey Report 2005

Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce & Industry TCCI BAROMETER. Palmos Analysis Ltd.

LOCAL AREA TOURISM IMPACT MODEL. Wandsworth borough report

Written Customer Complaints Complaint Handling in the Water Industry England and Wales April 2012 March 2013

Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce & Industry TCCI BAROMETER. March Palmos Analysis. March 11

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

2011/12 Household Travel Survey Summary Report 2013 Release

Inverness, Culloden and Suburbs Settlement Economic Overview

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

Street Based Lifestyle Monitor

ERA Monthly Market Analysis

Q Earnings Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, July 28, 2016 OMRON Corporation

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

EXPO 88 IMPACT THE IMPACT OF WORLD EXPO 88 ON QUEENSLAND'S TOURISM INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND TOURIST AND TRAVEL CORPORATION GPO BOX 328, BRISBANE, 4001

3rd QUARTER STATISTICAL REPORT

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

2. Our response follows the structure of the consultation document and covers the following issues in turn:

Auckland City Centre: Transport Capacity and Access Trends

Annual Gross Domestic Product (Production Measure)

Caravan & Camping Park Sector Annual Report 2011

Digital twin for life predictions in civil aerospace

Hamilton s Business Economy

Land area 1.73 million km 2 Queensland population (December 2015) Brisbane population* (June 2015)

Congestion. Vikrant Vaze Prof. Cynthia Barnhart. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology

How much did the airline industry recover since September 11, 2001?

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

West of England LEP Quarterly Economic Bulletin April 2012

Connecting People Building Opportunities BRISBANE AIRPORT 2014 MASTER PLAN

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM. Sunninghill flight path analysis report February 2016

Petrofin Research Greek fleet statistics

ERA Monthly Market Analysis

Content. Study Results. Next Steps. Background

Jan-18. Dec-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

Main Points in the Results for FY2015

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Oct-17 Nov-17. Sep-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slightly faster rate

VIEWPOINT JANUARY Japan Hotel Market Outlook

RESEARCH INDUSTRIAL SNAPSHOT

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

5th NAMIBIA TOURISM SATELLITE ACCOUNT. Edition

Trail Count Report. For period: Oct March By: Mandy Kennedy for the Board of Trustees. Date: 03 April 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Total Supply by Location, Q Existing Supply

REPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn

September More detailed data on complaint and unwanted contact numbers can be found in appendices 1-10.

ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT

IATA ECONOMICS BRIEFING AIRLINE BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDEX OCTOBER 2010 SURVEY

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

Outlook for Future Demand

Wellington $312 $49 $456 OVERVIEW WELLINGTON REGIONAL SUMMARY

Scottish Borders Council Economic Development Quarterly Bulletin, June 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

Tourism Barometer Snapshot Expectations of the Greek Hospitality Sector

Regional Differences in International Airline Operating Economics: 2008 and 2009

NatWest UK Regional PMI. Slowdown in UK growth in November led by downturn in London business activity

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

UK Aviation Forecasts

Oct-17 Nov-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

September Household complaints to water companies in England and Wales April 2017 March 2018

CLICK ABOVE TO CONTIUE

An Evaluation of the impact

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Queensland Economic Update

Happy Jetting. A Conversation With Dave Barger, President And Chief Executive Officer, JetBlue Airways, Page 14.

Time-series methodologies Market share methodologies Socioeconomic methodologies

GARDEN GROVE. 15 Bahrs Scrub Road, Bahrs Scrub

49 May-17. Jun-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

Travel and Tourism in Ukraine: Key Trends and Opportunities to 2016

TfL Planning. 1. Question 1

CairnsWatch. March Level 1, 95 Sheridan Street Cairns Qld 4870 PO Box 6843 Cairns Qld 4870

PART II. Authors: Agnes DeFranco, Ed.D., CHAE Arlene Ramirez, CHE, CHAE Tanya Venegas, MBA, MHM, CHIA

July 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

SA Tourism Barometer March Quarter 2012

2016 Edition. Lesotho Tourism Development Corporation. July Page of 39

C O L L A T E R A L V E R I F I C A T I O N S, L L C SPECIAL AIRCRAFT REPORT -BOMBARDIER CRJ-200LR- APRIL 2013

Wakatipu Area Strategy Plan

Swaziland. Sugar Annual. The supply and demand of sugar in Swaziland

Duna House Barometer. 40 th issue rd quarter + September 2014

Transcription:

WRMP19 Non-household consumption forecast AR1156 5 th September 2017

Report title: Report number: WRMP19 Non-household consumption forecast AR1156 Date: 5/09/2017 Client: Author(s): SES Water Dene Marshallsay The contents of this document are subject to copyright and all rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. This document has been produced by Artesia Consulting Ltd. Any enquiries relating to this report should be referred to the authors at the following address: Artesia Consulting Ltd, Unit 2 Badminton Court, Yate, Station Road, Bristol, BS37 5HZ. Telephone: + 44 (0) 1454 320091 Website: www.artesia-consulting.co.uk

Executive Summary This report presents the draft forecast for non-household demand for WRMP19 for SES Water. It is based on analysis of reported non-hh consumption from the two previous water resource zones (East Surrey, and Sutton), plus the consumption from the largest user Gatwick Airport (which sits within the East Surrey zone). Since the previous WRMP was produced, the non-household consumption has shown a decrease to a minimum in 2012-13 followed by a steady increase to 2015-16. A central forecast has been produced based on time series and linear modelling, and upper and lower forecasts have been produced based on assumptions about trends and market competition. These are shown in the graph and table below. 33 32 31 Non household consumption (Ml/d) 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 2038-39 2039-40 2040-41 2041-42 2042-43 2043-44 2044-45 2045-46 2046-47 2047-48 2048-49 2049-50 2050-51 2051-52 2052-53 2053-54 2054-55 2055-56 2056-57 2057-58 2058-59 2059-60 2060-61 2061-62 2062-63 2063-64 2064-65 2065-66 2066-67 2067-68 2068-69 2069-70 2070-71 2071-72 2072-73 2073-74 2074-75 2075-76 2076-77 2077-78 2078-79 2079-80 Year Central forecast (Ml/d) Upper forecast (Ml/d) Lower forecast (Ml/d) 2015/16 (Base year) 27.87 27.87 27.87 2020/21 27.97 28.38 27.36 2025/26 27.96 28.65 27.08 2030/31 27.96 28.92 26.81 2035/36 27.95 29.19 26.55 2040/41 27.95 29.45 26.28 2045/46 27.94 29.66 26.07 2079/80 27.94 29.66 26.07

Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Analysis of non-household consumption data... 2 3 Non-household forecasts... 3 Figures Figure 1 WRMP14 forecast plotted with actual non-household consumption... 1 Figure 2 Proportion of non-household water use by category... 2 Figure 3 Non-household consumption trends by area... 3 Figure 4 East Surrey (minus Gatwick) forecast... 4 Figure 5 Sutton forecast... 4 Figure 6 Gatwick and Unmeasured non-households... 5 Figure 7 Non-household consumption forecast... 5 Figure 8 Non-household consumption forecast showing upper and lower limits... 6

1 Introduction This report presents the draft forecast for non-household demand for WRMP19 for SES Water. It is based on analysis of reported non-hh consumption from the two previous water resource zones (East Surrey, and Sutton), plus the consumption from the largest user Gatwick Airport (which sits within the East Surrey zone). The Company monitors the consumption of metered non-household properties within its WRZ. Meter readings during the period 2000 to 2016 are collected by the Company and used to estimate average daily consumption for each of the metered non-households. A small proportion of non-households are not metered, and for these the Company estimates their consumption. In the previous WRMP, the Company carried out analysis of historical non-household consumption data, and found no clear trend in overall non-household consumption. Although employment in South East England was generally expected to grow, at the time there was considerable uncertainty regarding the effects of the economic downturn. The Company therefore took a prudent approach of maintaining non-household consumption at the then current levels throughout the planning period. The WRMP14 forecast is shown in Figure 1 (red line) plotted against the actual non-household consumption (black line). Figure 1 WRMP14 forecast plotted with actual non-household consumption 32 31 30 29 28 Consumption (Ml/d) 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 JR reported total non household consumption WRMP14 forecast 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Reporting year For the draft WRMP19 forecast of non-household consumption, we have taken a more detailed look at the historic consumption trends in each of the main company supply areas (East Surrey and Sutton) and the consumption in Gatwick Airport. This has been done to analyse consumption at the finer resolution possible with the data available and to identify whether any trend was present within each component. It is also important to note that Gatwick airport has been analysed separately as the airport has implemented various water efficiency measures, bringing down consumption for the last 3 years 1, and are currently forecasting no growth in water supply requirements. Their report highlights 24% reduction in water use since 2010, 45% reduction of water use per passenger since 2010, and new airport toilet facilities using 30% less water. Going forward the airport plan to continue their programme of leak surveys on the site, upgrade existing and install new meters across the site, and continue to identify projects with potential to include rainwater harvesting. 1 http://www.gatwickairport.com/business-community/community-sustainability/sustainability/sustainabilityreports/ 1

2 Analysis of non-household consumption data For the latest full reporting year the non-household consumption from each user has been grouped into usage description categories by SES Water. We have grouped these into a shorter set of alternative categories to illustrate the range of uses. This is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 Proportion of non-household water use by category 13 12 11 Proportion of non household consumption (%) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Schools Gatwick Airport Shop Farm Accomodation Healthcare Entertainment, food Sports facilities Industrial Other Offices Unknown Hotel Travel (excluding airports) Caravan site Prison Emergency services Utilities HM Forces Church, cemetery Allotment Bulk supply Commercial Garden Centre Public buildings Airports The largest category is schools (this includes boarding schools as well as day schools), the second largest Gatwick Airport, after that shops, farms and accommodation (domestic and managed flats). A large part of the non-household consumption appears to be associated with the general population (schools, healthcare, entertainment and food, sports, etc.) as opposed industrial use. Figure 3 shows the trends in consumption broken down into the two main supply areas (East Surrey (minus Gatwick), and Sutton), Gatwick airport on its own, and the unmeasured non-households properties across the Company area. East Surrey (minus Gatwick) shows a declining trend from 2001 to 2013, after this there is a steady increase in total consumption. The Sutton area is very different in that there is a steady upward trend in consumption from 2001 to 2016. Gatwick airport has been fairly flat from 2001 to 2010. After this time, there as period of 3 years where consumption has reduced, and is now flat. This is largely due to a series of water efficiency and conservation initiatives taken by Gatwick airport after 2010. Gatwick airport estimates that it s water consumption will remain flat over the foreseeable future regardless of any increase on passenger numbers. The unmeasured component of non-household water use has been steadily decreasing from 2001 due to a reduction in number of unmeasured non-households properties. Note: The non-household cohort currently includes about 2000 shared flats, and the consumption from these is included in the non-household forecast. In the reporting year 2017/18, SES Water are planning 2

to move about 2000 shared flats properties from the non-household cohort into the household cohort. When these properties are moved from non-household to household, both the household and non-household forecasts will need to be updated, but this cannot be done until the precise nature of these properties (in terms of meter type and occupancy) is determined. Figure 3 Non-household consumption trends by area 20 18 16 East Surrey area minus Gatwick Sutton area Gatwick airport Unmeasured non households 14 Consumption (Ml/d) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Reporting year 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 3 Non-household forecasts The non-household forecasts have been based on four components with good quality historic data from 2000; these components are: Measured non-household consumption in the East Surrey water supply area (minus Gatwick). Measured non-household consumption in the Sutton water supply area. Measured non household consumption in Gatwick Airport. Unmeasured non-household consumption. The East Surrey (minus Gatwick) area consumption produces a reasonable linear model with ONS unemployment data with a lag of one year. There is a five year forecast of the unemployment rate, which increases from the base year value of 4.9 to 5.7 in 2018 and then reduces to 5.2 in 2019 and 2020; we assume that the figure remains unchanged after this period. This forecast of unemployment rate has been used to predict the East Surrey (minus Gatwick) area consumption. The East Surrey (minus Gatwick) area consumption also shows a downward time-series linear trend and this has been added to the forecast. The final forecast for East Surrey (minus Gatwick) shows a decline over the planning period from 15.75 to 15.5 Ml/d (Figure 4). 3

Figure 4 East Surrey (minus Gatwick) forecast The Sutton area consumption has an upward time-series linear trend, this is assumed to be related to growth in the services sector. This upward trend has been used to forecast the Sutton area consumption for the first 5 years of the plan. After this date, the consumption remains flat. The increase from 9.16 to 9.49 Ml/d is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5 Sutton forecast 4

Gatwick (2.04 Ml/d) and the unmeasured non-household consumption (0.92 Ml/d) are assumed to remain flat over the forecast period (Figure 6). Figure 6 Gatwick and Unmeasured non-households The forecast consumptions for the East Surrey (minus Gatwick) area, Sutton area, Gatwick and unmeasured non-households have then been added together. This provides the central forecast shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 Non-household consumption forecast 33 32 31 Non household consumption (Ml/d) 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 2038-39 2039-40 2040-41 2041-42 2042-43 2043-44 2044-45 2045-46 2046-47 2047-48 2048-49 2049-50 2050-51 2051-52 2052-53 2053-54 2054-55 2055-56 2056-57 2057-58 2058-59 2059-60 2060-61 2061-62 2062-63 2063-64 2064-65 2065-66 2066-67 2067-68 2068-69 2069-70 2070-71 2071-72 2072-73 2073-74 2074-75 2075-76 2076-77 2077-78 2078-79 2079-80 An upper forecast has been produced by allowing applying the Sutton upward trend over to 2045, after which the consumption is assumed to remain flat to 2080. A lower forecast has been produced by firstly producing a linear downward trend from the historic total consumption (minus the recession years from 2010 to 2015) for the first four years. After this an 5

assumption is made that the trend continues due to the impact of market competition to 2045, followed by flat consumption to 2080. The resulting upper and lower bounds to the forecast are shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 Non-household consumption forecast showing upper and lower limits 33 32 31 Non household consumption (Ml/d) 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 2038-39 2039-40 2040-41 2041-42 2042-43 2043-44 2044-45 2045-46 2046-47 2047-48 2048-49 2049-50 2050-51 2051-52 2052-53 2053-54 2054-55 2055-56 2056-57 2057-58 2058-59 2059-60 2060-61 2061-62 2062-63 2063-64 2064-65 2065-66 2066-67 2067-68 2068-69 2069-70 2070-71 2071-72 2072-73 2073-74 2074-75 2075-76 2076-77 2077-78 2078-79 2079-80 Table 1 shows the summary values for the non-household demand forecast every five years, along with the upper and lower ranges. Table 1 Summary non-household demand forecast values Year Central forecast (Ml/d) Upper forecast (Ml/d) Lower forecast (Ml/d) 2015/16 (Base year) 27.87 27.87 27.87 2020/21 27.97 28.38 27.36 2025/26 27.96 28.65 27.08 2030/31 27.96 28.92 26.81 2035/36 27.95 29.19 26.55 2040/41 27.95 29.45 26.28 2045/46 27.94 29.66 26.07 2079/80 27.94 29.66 26.07 6