Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Similar documents
Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Enrollment and Educator Data ( School Year) About the Data

Cato Elementary School School Report Card Jacksonville Cato Road North Little Rock, AR

Brookland Middle School School Report Card W. School St. Brookland, AR

Landmark Elementary School School Report Card Arch Street Pike Little Rock, AR

Pine Forest Elementary School School Report Card Pine Forest Drive Maumelle, AR

Sheridan Intermediate School School Report Card Skyline Sheridan, AR

Pine Forest Elementary School School Report Card Pine Forest Drive Maumelle, AR

Cato Elementary School School Report Card Jacksonville Cato Road North Little Rock, AR

College Station Elem. School School Report Card Frasier Pike, PO Bx 670 College Station, AR

Report to the Legislature Education Committees

Irish Fair of Minnesota: 2017 Attendee Profile

NPS PARCC Results Show Continued Progress NJDOE releases official statewide results that show that NPS schools are improving more quickly than state

Technical Summary for Form F of the Iowa Assessments

Limited English Proficiency Plan

GCSE Legacy and Revised Wales Results, June 2017.

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Travel Decision Survey 2012

Travel Decision Survey Summary Report. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA)

Educational inequality in Mozambique

Title III, Part A: NCLB Compliance Report and Initial Compliance Review (ICR) Indicators

5th Level Subagency Report. OSD, Agencies and Activities DIRECTOR CLINICAL SPT

Lake Superior College Program Planner

Tool: Overbooking Ratio Step by Step

Myrtle Beach AAU Wave , April

Myrtle Beach AAU Wave , February

Longitudinal Analysis Report. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Campus

Longitudinal Analysis Report. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide Campus

Demographic Profile 2013 census

P ARK I MPROVEMENTS 2013

Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile

Experian Corporate Responsibility performance data 2018

CAMPBELTOWN PROFILE May 2014

2006 RENO-SPARKS VISITOR PROFILE STUDY

Statistical Picture of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander School Students in Australia

2015 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

Nevada s Tourism, Gaming, and Entertainment Sector

COURSE INFORMATION. What this course is all about! Insight into the lifestyle of a Flight Attendant! Basic requirements for all airlines!

North Lanarkshire. Skills Assessment January SDS-1163-Jan16

CYPRESSGARDENS,FL LEGOLAND/COURTYARDMARRIOTRETAIL ComingSoonNew Retail7,500SF

Guide to Answering Program Implementation Questions In Compliance Reports for

2011 Visitor Profile Survey

Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals Scholarship Application

FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR GRADING BIAS INVOLVING SWDENTS WITH RACIAL, ETHNIC AND GENDER DIFFERENCES

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

2013 IRVING HOTEL GUEST SURVEY Final Project Report

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Swaziland. HDI values and rank changes in the 2013 Human Development Report

Fixed-Route Customer Satisfaction Survey Report

PUBLIC OPPOSED TO GAMING S EXPANSION AND DIVIDED OVER REVENUE SHARING WITH AC

Community Health Status Assessment

CAMP ECHO PAYMENT & ENROLLMENT POLICIES

Population and Labor Force Projections for New Jersey: 2014 to 2034

Rides Mass Transit District. Jackson County Mass Transit District. FY 2020 Program of Projects (POP) Carbondale UZA

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

ADVENTURE TRAVEL TRENDS SNAPSHOT

PARKS & RECREATION Public Input Planning Session. June 9, 2014

The Quality of Life Report

Chapter 1: The Population of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

DUNOON PROFILE May 2014

I T N E T R E N R A N T A I T ON O AL A L A R A R R I R VA V L A S L S A N A D N D D E D PA

FIXED ROUTE DASHBOARD JULY 2018

COTATI CITY PROFILE REPORT

Home Values near Apache Junction, AZ

2017 Camper Application

Papua New Guinea Secondary School Atlas By Papua New Guinea Department of Education READ ONLINE

FINAL. Summary Report 2017 On-Board Passenger Survey

Q1 Did you know that Salt Lake City has a Trails & Natural Lands Program?

Fall Brand Tracking New York City

General Information on 24-Month OPT Extension Based on Degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Math (STEM)

Doral Academy of Northern Nevada. Arts Integration Education

Study on Hotel Management Graduates Perceptions and Preferences of Jobs in Hotel Industry in Chennai City

2015 YMCA Camp Onyahsa Financial Aid/Scholarship Application

2018 YMCA Camp Onyahsa Financial Aid / Scholarship Application

ELMHURST, NY MARKET PROFILE. FOR INFORMATION: Macerich.com

Real World Performance Tasks

Board of Directors Information Summary

2018 Faculty Report. Office of Diversity, Equity, and Access

*Please note all questions marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals Scholarship Application

Puerto Ricans in Massachusetts, the United States, and Puerto Rico, 2014

STARBASE 2018 Indianapolis Summer Camp Programs. This packet contains all the forms necessary to apply.

Louisville Neighborhoods A Statistical Portrait

Thank you for participating in the financial results for fiscal 2014.

LITERACY IN NOVA SCOTIA Implications of Findings from IALSS 2003

City of Lafayette. Request for Proposals Municipal Airport Fixed Based Operator

PORTREE PROFILE May 2014

STATISTICAL BULLETIN ON MONTHLY MIGRATION STATISTICS DECEMBER 2016 SERIES NO. SDT: 39-M 55. Government of Tonga

Newport News Tourism Development Office Mission Statement

T H E VILLAGE OF P h i l m o n t, N Y

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

Fall Brand Tracking - Ontario

Tourism Industry Council Tasmania Community Survey 2018 Research Report. May 2018

Time-series methodologies Market share methodologies Socioeconomic methodologies

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

SHETLAND AREA PROFILE

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Individual Lab Report Ci-Trol Jun,2016. APTT (seconds) Ci-Trol 1 - Lot# Your Lab

Park Use and Corresponding Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls

Transcription:

Massachusetts School and District Profiles Centerville Elementary Centerville Elementary (00200010) Matthew D Scheufele, Principal Mailing Address: 658 Bay Ln Centerville, MA 02632-3399 Phone: (508) 790-9890 FAX: (508) 790-9895 Website: http://www.barnstable.k12.ma.us/domain/14 This report card contains information required by the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for our school and district including: student enrollment and teacher qualifications, student achievement, accountability, and the progress our school is making toward narrowing proficiency gaps for different groups of students. Enrollment and Educator Data (-16 School Year) About the Data School District State Total Count 329 4,914 953,429 Race/Ethnicity (%) African American or 5.2 7.1 8.8 Black Asian 1.2 2.4 6.5 Hispanic or Latino 10.3 10.3 18.6 Multi-race, 1.8 4.3 3.2 on-hispanic ative American 0.9 0.7 0.2 ative Hawaiian or 0.0 0.2 0.1 Pacific Islander White 80.5 74.9 62.7 Gender (%) Male 54.7 51.2 51.2 Female 45.3 48.8 48.8 Selected Populations (%) English Language 14.9 8.2 9.0 Learner Economically 29.2 28.9 27.4 Disadvantaged Students w/disabilities 15.8 15.5 17.2 First Language ot English 14.9 8.2 19.0 Enrollment (-16) School District State Total # of Teachers 23.8 368.1 72,384.1 Percentage of Teachers Licensed in Teaching Assignment 100.0 100.0 97.4 Total umber of Classes in Core Academic Areas 80 1,482 348,472 Percentage of Core 100.0 99.9 96.3 Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are Highly Qualified Percentage of Core Academic Classes Taught by Teachers Who are ot Highly Qualified 0.0 0.1 3.7 Student/Teacher Ratio 13.9 to 1 13.3 to 1 13.2 to 1 Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers Issued Waivers - 0.0 0.9 Educator Data (-16) K, 01, 02, 03 Grades Offered: MCAS Results by Subgroup by Grade and Subject OTE: First-year ELL students are not included in achievement level or results. However, first-year ELL students who took the ACCESS for ELLs test are counted as ELA participants; in addition, first-year ELL students who are present for Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering are counted as Mathematics/Science and Technology/Engineering participants. Please see the principal's administration manual (PAM) for details. OTE: Spring results in grades 3-8 ELA and Mathematics are not reported because all students in this organization participated in the PARCC test. More about the data Data Last Updated on September 26, Data Under Review or Fewer than 10 students were tested.

PARCC Results by Subgroup by Grade and Subject Achievement Levels: Trans. = Transitional Student Growth Percentile L5 = Level 5: Exceeded Expectations (varies by grade - 850) generated using current PARCC and prior MCAS scores L4 = Level 4: Met Expectations (750 - varies by grade) Trans. = Transitional Composite Performance Index L3 = Level 3: Approached Expectations (725-749) generated using linked PARCC and MCAS scores L2 = Level 2: Partially met Expectations (700-724) L1 = Level 1: Did not meet Expectations (650-699) OTE: Since only a portion of students in grades 3-8 participated in PARCC in ELA/L and Mathematics, a representative sample of students from across Massachusetts was used to estimate student achievement at the state level in those subjects. OTE: Students who took the Alternate Assessment are included in Mean, but not in achievement level or growth results. Data Last Updated on September 24,

GRADE 3 ELA/L School District State IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. in in in Student Group # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) Subgroups High needs 38 100 0 29292616 76.6 -- -- 180 100 1 44261613 79.9 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Econ. disadvantaged 27 100 0 37261919 78.7 -- -- 127 99 1 50251311 83.1 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - ELL/Formerly ELL 10 100 0 10404010 70.0 -- -- 61 99 0 43252111 77.0 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Students w/disablities 10 100 0 0 0 5050 66.7 -- -- 38 100 0 11213237 64.7 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black -- -- 17 100 0 472424 6 83.8 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Asian 1 -- -- 6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino 8 -- -- 33 97 3 39182415 77.3 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. 2 -- -- 15 100 0 602013 7 82.4 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - White 69 100 6 413017 6 84.4 -- -- 284 99 6 5624 9 6 88.6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Male 42 100 0 38361710 82.2 -- -- 177 99 3 492713 8 84.5 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Female 38 100 13421821 5 86.0 -- -- 179 99 7 6020 9 5 89.8 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - on-disabled 70 100 7 463114 1 88.6 -- -- 318 99 6 5923 8 3 90.7 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - on-econ. disadvantaged 53 100 9 422819 2 87.5 -- -- 229 99 7 562210 4 89.6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - ELL 10 100 0 10404010 70.0 -- -- 52 98 0 37252513 73.6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Ever ELL 16 100 6 313125 6 81.3 -- -- 69 99 1 43261910 79.7 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - All Students 80 100 6 402819 8 84.1 -- -- 356 99 5 542311 7 87.1 -- -- - - - - - - - - - -

GRADE 3 Math School District State IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. in in in Student Group # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) Subgroups High needs 38 100 5 243434 3 76.1 -- -- 182 100 9 422719 3 84.5 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Econ. disadvantaged 27 100 7 223337 0 77.2 -- -- 129 100 8 462817 2 87.3 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - ELL/Formerly ELL 10 100 0 303040 0 70.0 -- -- 62 100 10421924 5 79.8 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Students w/disablities 10 100 0 0 306010 68.1 -- -- 39 100 5 184131 5 76.5 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black -- -- 17 100 12185912 0 91.3 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Asian 1 -- -- 6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino 8 -- -- 34 100 3 441532 6 75.0 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. 2 -- -- 15 100 7 5333 7 0 89.7 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - White 69 100 9 383219 3 84.0 -- -- 285 99 16462412 2 89.9 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Male 42 100 5 452124 5 81.1 -- -- 178 99 13492211 3 89.3 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Female 38 100 11293918 3 83.7 -- -- 180 100 15422616 2 87.8 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - on-disabled 70 100 9 433016 3 86.1 -- -- 319 99 15492211 2 90.5 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - on-econ. disadvantaged 53 100 8 452813 6 85.6 -- -- 229 99 18452211 3 89.3 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - ELL 10 100 0 303040 0 70.0 -- -- 53 100 9 382126 6 77.4 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - Ever ELL 16 100 0 502525 0 79.7 -- -- 70 100 9 462021 4 81.8 -- -- - - - - - - - - - - All Students 80 100 8 383021 4 82.4 -- -- 358 99 14462413 3 88.6 -- -- - - - - - - - - - -

GRADES 3-8 ELA/L School District State IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. in in in Student Group # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) Subgroups High needs 38 100 0 29292616 76.6 -- -- 1,049 98 4 35291913 75.8 37.0 774 - - - - - - - - - - Econ. disadvantaged 27 100 0 37261919 78.7 -- -- 750 98 6 40271710 79.3 37.0 554 - - - - - - - - - - ELL/Formerly ELL 10 100 0 10404010 70.0 -- -- 235 99 0 28302120 67.0 42.0 128 - - - - - - - - - - Students w/disablities 10 100 0 0 0 50 50 66.7 -- -- 348 95 0 14 28 34 24 61.8 30.0 287 - - - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black -- -- 151 98 2 27302219 70.9 38.0 116 - - - - - - - - - - Asian 1 -- -- 41 100 154929 5 2 92.1 53.0 32 - - - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino 8 -- -- 217 98 3 37222315 72.9 43.0 150 - - - - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. 2 -- -- 91 97 7 472712 7 83.0 36.0 71 - - - - - - - - - - White 69 100 6 413017 6 84.4 -- -- 1,676 98 135122 9 5 88.6 42.0 1,300 - - - - - - - - - - Male 42 100 0 38361710 82.2 -- -- 1,128 98 7 442614 9 82.2 38.0 873 - - - - - - - - - - Female 38 100 13421821 5 86.0 -- -- 1,062 98 155120 9 4 89.1 45.0 809 - - - - - - - - - - on-disabled 70 100 7 46 31 14 1 88.6 -- -- 1,842 99 13 54 22 7 3 90.7 44.0 1,395 - - - - - - - - - - on-econ. disadvantaged 53 100 9 42 28 19 2 87.5 -- -- 1,440 98 14 52 21 9 5 88.9 43.0 1,128 - - - - - - - - - - ELL 10 100 0 10404010 70.0 -- -- 148 99 0 16262830 55.8 39.0 59 - - - - - - - - - - Ever ELL 16 100 6 313125 6 81.3 -- -- 376 99 4 34281915 73.8 42.0 254 - - - - - - - - - - All Students 80 100 6 402819 8 84.1 -- -- 2,190 98 11482311 7 85.6 41.0 1,682 - - - - - - - - - - 70 100 7 5926 6 3 91.1 -- -- 2,142 97 13502310 4 87.2 51.0 1,605 - - - - - - - - - -

GRADES 3-8 MATH School District State IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. IncludedPart. % at Each Trans. Trans. Incl. in in in Student Group # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) # % L5L4L3L2L1 (#) Subgroups High needs 38 100 5 243434 3 76.1 -- -- 1,046 97 4 30292413 69.0 41.0 778 - - - - - - - - - - Econ. disadvantaged 27 100 7 223337 0 77.2 -- -- 748 98 4 34302111 72.1 41.0 554 - - - - - - - - - - ELL/Formerly ELL 10 100 0 303040 0 70.0 -- -- 235 99 4 29233014 64.7 45.0 134 - - - - - - - - - - Students w/disablities 10 100 0 0 30 60 10 68.1 -- -- 346 96 1 13 26 36 24 55.0 36.0 289 - - - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black -- -- 152 99 3 14332723 58.7 29.0 119 - - - - - - - - - - Asian 1 -- -- 41 100 10512217 0 84.1 50.0 32 - - - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino 8 -- -- 217 98 3 33232614 66.7 45.0 154 - - - - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. 2 -- -- 90 96 4 422917 8 77.2 33.0 72 - - - - - - - - - - White 69 100 9 383219 3 84.0 -- -- 1,673 98 10472613 4 83.2 44.0 1,298 - - - - - - - - - - Male 42 100 5 452124 5 81.1 -- -- 1,128 98 8 412716 8 77.9 40.0 879 - - - - - - - - - - Female 38 100 11293918 3 83.7 -- -- 1,059 98 9 442715 5 81.0 46.0 809 - - - - - - - - - - on-disabled 70 100 9 43 30 16 3 86.1 -- -- 1,841 99 10 48 27 12 3 84.6 45.0 1,399 - - - - - - - - - - on-econ. disadvantaged 53 100 8 45 28 13 6 85.6 -- -- 1,439 98 11 48 25 13 4 83.3 44.0 1,134 - - - - - - - - - - ELL 10 100 0 303040 0 70.0 -- -- 149 99 3 21173821 55.3 36.0 66 - - - - - - - - - - Ever ELL 16 100 0 502525 0 79.7 -- -- 376 99 4 34242612 69.2 48.0 259 - - - - - - - - - - All Students 80 100 8 383021 4 82.4 -- -- 2,187 98 8 432716 6 79.4 43.0 1,688 - - - - - - - - - - 70 100 6 5627 7 4 91.8 -- -- 2,149 97 7 412917 6 78.5 50.0 1,692 - - - - - - - - - -

Accountability Data - Centerville Elementary Accountability Information Accountability and Assistance Level Level 1 Level held harmless This school's overall performance relative to other schools in same school type (School percentiles: 1-99) All - students: This school s progress toward narrowing proficiency gaps (Cumulative Progress and Performance Index: 1-100) Student Group (Click group to view subgroup data) On Target = 75 or higher - Less progress More progress All students 61 Did ot Meet Target High needs - Econ. Disadvantaged - ELL and Former ELL - Students w/disabilities - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - Asian - Afr. Amer./Black - Hispanic/Latino - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - White 57 Did ot Meet Target

Centerville Elementary: Accountability Data Detail English Language Arts Proficiency Gap arrowing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline Change Target 6 Year Goal Percentile in School Type PPI Points Rating All students 94.4 91.1 84.1-7.0 96.7 97.2 34 88 0 Declined High needs 90.5 84.6 76.6-8.0 94.5 95.3 61 46 0 Declined Econ. Disadvantaged 84.8 84.8 78.7-6.1 86.1 92.4 60 34 0 Declined ELL and Former ELL - - - - - - - 10 - - Students w/disabilities - - - - - - - 18 - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - - - Asian - - - - - - - 1 - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - - - - - 3 - - Hispanic/Latino - - - - - - - 8 - - Multi-race, - - - - - - - 4 - - on-hisp./lat. at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - - - White 93.9 92.3 84.4-7.9 96.4 97.0 25 72 0 Declined Mathematics Proficiency Gap arrowing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline Change Target 6 Year Goal Percentile in School Type PPI Points Rating All students 93.3 91.8 82.4-9.4 96.1 96.7 16 88 0 Declined High needs 85.7 87.2 76.1-11.1 91.7 92.9 29 46 0 Declined Econ. Disadvantaged 86.6 86.6 77.2-9.4 87.7 93.3 37 34 0 Declined ELL and Former ELL - - - - - - - 10 - - Students w/disabilities - - - - - - - 18 - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - - - Asian - - - - - - - 1 - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - - - - - 3 - - Hispanic/Latino - - - - - - - 8 - - Multi-race, - - - - - - - 4 - - on-hisp./lat. at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - - - White 93.9 93.6 84.0-9.6 96.4 97.0 11 72 0 Declined Science Proficiency Gap arrowing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline Change Target 6 Year Goal Percentile in School Type PPI Points All students - - - - - - - - - - High needs - - - - - - - - - - Econ. Disadvantaged - - - - - - - - - - ELL and Former ELL - - - - - - - - - - Students w/disabilities - - - - - - - - - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - - - Rating

Asian - - - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - - - - - - - - - Multi-race, - - - - - - - - - - on-hisp./lat. at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - - - White - - - - - - - - - - English Language Arts Extra Credit Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) % Advanced % Advanced PPI Points % Warning/Failing Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more) % Warning/Failing All students 8.2 10.2 88 25 1.4 5.7 88 0 High needs 5.1 0.0 46 0 2.6 10.9 46 0 Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 0.0 34 0 3.6 14.7 34 0 ELL and Former ELL - - 10 - - - 10 - Students w/disabilities - - 18 - - - 18 - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - Asian - - 1 - - - 1 - Afr. Amer./Black - - 3 - - - 3 - Hispanic/Latino - - 8 - - - 8 - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. - - 4 - - - 4 - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - White 9.1 11.1 72 25 1.8 4.2 72 0 PPI Points Mathematics Extra Credit Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) % Advanced % Advanced PPI Points % Warning/Failing Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more) % Warning/Failing All students 30.1 18.2 88 0 4.1 11.4 88 0 High needs 20.5 13.0 46 0 5.1 15.2 46 0 Econ. Disadvantaged 21.4 17.6 34 0 7.1 11.8 34 0 ELL and Former ELL - - 10 - - - 10 - Students w/disabilities - - 18 - - - 18 - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - Asian - - 1 - - - 1 - Afr. Amer./Black - - 3 - - - 3 - Hispanic/Latino - - 8 - - - 8 - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. - - 4 - - - 4 - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - White 32.7 20.8 72 0 3.6 8.3 72 0 PPI Points

Science Extra Credit Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) % Advanced % Advanced PPI Points % Warning/Failing Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more) % Warning/Failing All students - - - - - - - - High needs - - - - - - - - Econ. Disadvantaged - - - - - - - - ELL and Former ELL - - - - - - - - Students w/disabilities - - - - - - - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - Asian - - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. - - - - - - - - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - White - - - - - - - - PPI Points English Language Arts Growth 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? PPI Points All students - - - 51.0 - - - - High needs - - - 51.0 - - - - Econ. Disadvantaged - - - 51.0 - - - - ELL and Former ELL - - - 51.0 - - - - Students w/disabilities - - - 51.0 - - - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - 51.0 - - - - Asian - - - 51.0 - - - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - 51.0 - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - - 51.0 - - - - Multi-race, - - - 51.0 - - - - on-hisp./lat. at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - 51.0 - - - - White - - - 51.0 - - - - Rating Mathematics Growth 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? PPI Points All students - - - 51.0 - - - - High needs - - - 51.0 - - - - Econ. Disadvantaged - - - 51.0 - - - - ELL and Former ELL - - - 51.0 - - - - Students w/disabilities - - - 51.0 - - - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - 51.0 - - - - Asian - - - 51.0 - - - - Afr. Amer./Black - - - 51.0 - - - - Hispanic/Latino - - - 51.0 - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. - - - 51.0 - - - - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - 51.0 - - - - White - - - 51.0 - - - - Rating

Extra credit for English language proficiency growth A Target A Included PPI Points All students 81.0 60.0 31 25 High needs 81.0 60.0 31 25 ELL and Former ELL - 60.0 31 - Assessment Participation English Language Arts Mathematics Science Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) All students 89 89 100 Yes 89 89 100 Yes - - - - High needs 47 47 100 Yes 47 47 100 Yes - - - - Econ. Disadvantaged 35 35 100 Yes 35 35 100 Yes - - - - ELL and Former ELL 10 - - - 10 - - - - - - - Students w/disabilities 19 - - - 19 - - - - - - - Amer. Ind. or Alaska at. - - - - - - - - - - - - Asian 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - Afr. Amer./Black 3 - - - 3 - - - - - - - Hispanic/Latino 8 - - - 8 - - - - - - - Multi-race, on-hisp./lat. 4 - - - 4 - - - - - - - at. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. - - - - - - - - - - - - White 73 73 100 Yes 73 73 100 Yes - - - - OTE: In, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's accountability and assistance level.

Massachusetts and ationwide AEP Results by Student Group Average Scaled Scores and Percentages of Students at Each Achievement Level About the Data AEP, or the ational Assessment of Educational Progress, is often called the "ation's Report Card." It is the only measure of student achievement in the United States that allows you to compare the performance of students in Massachusetts with the performance of students across the nation or in other states. Students take the AEP in reading and mathematics every two years. When reviewing these results, it is important to keep in mind that the AEP results are based on a small sample of students across Massachusetts, not the population of Massachusetts students. For more information, please visit http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/naep/faq.html. The following symbols are used to denote the AEP achievement levels: A for Advanced, P+ for Proficient and above, B+ for Basic and above, BB for Below Basic. The symbol "#" means that the estimated number of students rounds to zero. GRADE LEVEL 4 - READIG Student Group Massachusetts ational Public Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed All Students 235 14 50 82 18 100 221 8 35 68 32 100 Stud. w/ Disab 209 2 20 55 45 18 186 2 12 33 67 13 LEP 200 1 12 44 56 9 189 1 8 32 68 11 African American/Black 217 3 25 65 35 7 206 2 18 51 49 15 Asian/Pacific Islander 249 31 68 89 11 6 238 19 53 81 19 5 Hispanic/Latino 215 3 25 61 39 19 208 3 21 54 46 26 White 242 17 58 89 11 65 232 11 46 79 21 49 Econ. Disadvantaged 220 5 29 67 33 42 209 3 21 56 44 55 GRADE LEVEL 4 - MATHEMATICS Student Group Massachusetts ational Public Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed All Students 251 13 54 90 10 100 240 7 39 81 19 100 Stud. w/ Disab 231 4 25 74 26 18 217 2 16 54 46 13 LEP 223 2 17 65 35 9 218 1 15 57 43 11 African American/Black 230 1 26 73 27 7 224 1 19 65 35 15 Asian/Pacific Islander 273 38 81 98 2 6 256 22 61 90 10 5 Hispanic/Latino 232 3 28 74 26 19 230 3 26 73 27 26 White 256 15 62 95 5 65 248 10 51 90 10 49 Econ. Disadvantaged 236 4 31 80 20 42 229 2 24 72 28 55 GRADE LEVEL 8 - READIG Student Group Massachusetts ational Public Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed All Students 274 6 46 83 17 100 264 3 33 75 25 100 Stud. w/ Disab 245 1 15 54 46 18 229 # 8 36 64 12 LEP 225 # 6 35 65 5 223 # 3 28 72 6 African American/Black 252 1 18 63 37 9 247 1 15 58 42 15 Asian/Pacific Islander 290 18 64 90 10 7 279 9 50 85 15 6 Hispanic/Latino 249 # 17 61 39 14 253 1 20 65 35 25 White 281 7 53 90 10 67 273 4 42 84 16 51 Econ. Disadvantaged 260 3 28 71 29 44 253 1 20 64 36 52 GRADE LEVEL 8 - MATHEMATICS Student Group Massachusetts ational Public Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Avg. Scaled % at Each Level Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed Score A P+ B+ BB % Assessed All Students 297 18 51 81 19 100 281 8 32 70 30 100 Stud. w/ Disab 264 3 16 51 49 18 246 1 8 32 68 12 LEP 251 2 10 38 62 6 246 1 5 31 69 6 African American/Black 268 4 22 54 46 9 260 1 12 47 53 15 Asian/Pacific Islander 324 44 73 94 6 7 305 25 58 86 14 6 Hispanic/Latino 271 4 24 61 39 15 269 3 19 60 40 25 White 304 20 59 88 12 66 291 10 42 81 19 51 Econ. Disadvantaged 279 7 31 67 33 43 268 2 18 58 42 52 Participation Rates for Students with Disabilities and for English Language Learner Students The AEP program has always endeavored to assess all students selected for testing. In all AEP schools, accommodations are provided as necessary for students with disabilities and/or English language learners. School staff who are familiar with these students are asked a series of questions to help them decide whether each student should participate in the assessment and whether the student needs accommodations. Grade/Subject # in Sample % of Sample - Students% of Sample - English with Disabilities Language Learners Grade 4 Reading 3,100 18 9 3 Grade 4 Mathematics 3,200 18 9 2 Grade 8 Reading 3,000 18 5 2 Grade 8 Mathematics 3,100 18 6 2 % of Students Excluded from Original Sample