Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report

Similar documents
South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 4 6/06 Quarterly Report (C-15397)

Land-Use and Water Quality Across the Cape Fear River Basin, NC: from 2001 to Jennifer Braswell Alford, PhD

Figure 1. Overview map of Burrard Inlet, showing location of False Creek inlet.

Tufts University Water: Systems, Science, and Society (WSSS) Program

RE: PATAHA CREEK FECAL COLIFORM COMPLIANCE WITH WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Long Pond Study

Appendix E. Pollutant Load Maps of SWAT Model Results

Portland Water District Sebago Lake Monitoring Programs Lower Bay Bacteria Monitoring Presenting data from 1977 to 2018 Laurel Jackson

Water quality monitoring and analysis of fecal coliform of Canadarago Lake tributaries and outlet

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

Analysis of Indicator Bacteria in NJ Dead-end Lagoons. Michael Callaghan Gasbarro Mentor: Dr. Kathryn Goddard

Report from the SMHI monitoring cruise with R/V Aranda

Assessment of Pathogen Strategies

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration, Bureau of Watershed Restoration

Finding sources of fecal coliform bacteria in stormwater runoff

Laboratories & Consulting Group

Clean Ocean Access Water Quality Monitoring Summary Report

OREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation BSK Associates Vancouver

Comparison of Gelman and Millipore Membrane Filters for Enumerating Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Water Quality Trends for Conscience Bay

Coliform Count. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Coliform Count Plate

CITY OF LYNDEN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT MARCH 1, 2016

Estuaries of South America

GB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE

FINAL Water Year 2012 Bacteria Sampling Report for the Klamath River Estuary

Project: Profiling Float Observations in the Aegean Sea

North Carolina Addendum Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Impaired Segments in the Dan River Watershed to Virginia TMDLs Approved by EPA Region 3

Nutrient and Sediment Loss from the Watersheds of Canandaigua Lake

Seasonal changes in macroinvertebrate communities in agricultural catchments: natural variation or anthropogenic impact? Stephen Davis (UCD/Teagasc)

Statistical Evaluation of BMP Effectiveness in Reducing Fecal Coliform Impairment in Mermentau River Basin

Cruise Report R/V "HEINCKE" Cruise- No. HE-316 ( 06HK1001 ) 27 January - 05 February This report is based on preliminary data!

LAKE HURON BEACH STUDY

Cruise Report R/V "ALKOR" Cruise- No. HE-365 ( 06AK1101 ) 01 February - 13 February This report is based on preliminary data!

Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate

Petrifilm. Interpretation Guide. Coliform Count Plate. Brand

3M TM Petrifilm TM. Petrifilm TM 3M TM. 3M TM Petrifilm TM Serie 2000 Rapid Coliform Count Plates - Ref.: / 50 Unit - Ref.

Pr oject Summar y. Survey of the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the surface of subprimal cuts of beef during winter months (Phase I)

E. coli and Coliform Bacteria Levels of Edgewood s Watershed Katie Schneider and Leslie Reed

ASSESSMENT OF FECAL COLIFORM IN LITTLE RABBIT CREEK AND LITTLE SURVIVAL CREEK

Gently apply pressure on spreader to distribute over circular area. Do not twist or slide the spreader. Interpretation

Comparative Analysis of Modeling Techniques for Coliform Organisms in Streams

TOTAL COLIFORM ANDE.coli INDICATOR BACTERIA TEST KIT UV

R. Weller December 10, 2014 Version 1.3

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES TR: 95-02

Bacterial Quality of Crystalline Rock and Glacial Aquifers in New England

Permittees under Sector S are primarily engaged in the following types of activities:

FECAL COLIFORM MONITORING IN GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: SUMMARY REPORT OF MONITORING RESULTS FOR

Aquatic insect surveys at Mount Magazine State Park and Hobbs State Park Conservation Area with implementation of an educational component

Outline. The main objectives. The main objectives. Distribution of stable isotopes in the Sava River in Serbia

Interpretation Guide 3M Petrifilm Rapid Coliform Count Plates

City of Peoria Clean Water Efforts. Governor s s Conference on the Management of the Illinois River October 4, 2007

Dales Voe UKS Last Edited 01/06/11 Page 1. Dales Voe. Report Reference Number 112

HSCC. Interpretation Guide. High-Sensitivity Coliform Count Plate

Managing Hypochlorite to Reduce Chlorate Formation: A Utility Case Study

Bacterial Occurrence in Kitchen Hand Towels

Water quality assessment of Gilgit river, using fecal and total coliform as indicators

Gliders and Autonomous Underwater and Surface Vehicles

Lower St. Johns River Tributaries Fecal Coliform Basin Management Action Plan Jacksonville Environmental Symposium

Pathogens and Grazing Livestock

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Saint Joes Creek, WBID 1668A

No Longer Fond of the Local Pond

C. Area of operation: Columbia River and Columbia River Estuary between mouth of estuary and Portland, Oregon.

Temperature affects the silicate morphology in a diatom

INTERPRETATION GUIDE AN INTRODUCTION TO USE AND INTERPRETING RESULTS FOR PEEL PLATE CC TESTS. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT CHARM SCIENCES

Loyalsock Creek Bacterial Coliforms. Presented By: Dr. Mel Zimmerman Clean Water Institute Lycoming College Matthew Bennett Jim Rogers

Adapting water resource management in coastal areas A case study in Hai Phong, Vietnam

Teleclass Sponsored by Webber Training, Hosted by Paul Webber,

Sampling for Microbial Analysis

NEW SOUTH WALES. Both METRIC and Feet and Inches TIMES: am/pm Sunrise/Sunset Moon Phases Moon Rise/Set DIARY NOTES.

Size data for all Gulf areas are available starting Fishing areas in the Headboat survey are described in Table 1.

Analysis of Changing Trend of Fecal Coliform Levels at Lakes in Hue Citadel, Vietnam

Acta Chim. Slov. 2004, 51, PHYSICO CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LAKE WATER IN 14 SLOVENIAN MOUNTAIN LAKES. Gregor Muri. Received

TACWA September Meeting CHALLENGES IN MEETING THE TEXAS BACTERIAL LIMITS WITH UV ALONG THE COAST AND BAYS. Gennady Boksiner, P.E. September 30, 2011

Fecal and Total Coliform TMDL for Sparkman Branch (WBID 1561)

Interpretation Guide

Interpretation Guide

MAURITIUS CANE INDUSTRY AUTHORITY MAURITIUS SUGARCANE INDUSTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

2018 Animas River Water Quality Monitoring

Aquatic Organic Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes, Water Quality, and Aquatic Productivity in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana 1

Appendix A: CSLAP 2009 Lake Water Quality Summary: DeRuyter Reservoir

REC. Interpretation Guide. Rapid E. coli/coliform Count Plate

BACTERIOLOGICAL MONITORING 109 TRAINING COURSE $ HOUR RUSH ORDER PROCESSING FEE ADDITIONAL $50.00

Meeting Agenda. Why are we here? Getting Started. Designated Uses. Water Quality Standards

Fecal Coliform TMDL for Strawberry Creek (WBID 2239)

Monitoring the marine environment

Chemistry and Preliminary Coliform Microbial Communities in Laguna Bacalar, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico.

Dilution of Wastewater Discharges from Moving Cruise Ships

EU GPP CRITERIA FOR INDOOR CLEANING SERVICES 1. INTRODUCTION

BLUE FLAG: A STEP TOWARDS

Evaluation copy. Fecal Coliform. Computer INTRODUCTION

Productivity. Technician. Maximized. Interpretation Guide

Community Members Julia Imrie, Ken Mayberry, David Stokes, John Webb, Annette Riley, Aleisha Lonsdale

Technological Field Performance of a New Point-of-Use Water Treatment Technology in a Randomized Control Trial in Limpopo, South Africa

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

One East First Street Reno, NV

system: with specific focus to the Mediterranean, the Black Sea and the Southern Seas (Antarctic) sponsored by MUIR since 2011 (0.

Visit Tallahassee. Economic Impact of Tourism Report Fiscal Year 2016

CruisePay Enhancements for 2005 Training Guide Version 1.0

Transcription:

Florida International University FIU Digital Commons SERC Research Reports Southeast Environmental Research Center 5-7-2003 Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report Ronald Jones Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University Joseph N. Boyer Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, boyerj@fiu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Ronald and Boyer, Joseph N., "Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report" (2003). SERC Research Reports. 36. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/36 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in SERC Research Reports by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu.

Southeast Environmental Research Center OE-148 Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199 305-348-3095, 305-348-4096 fax, http://serc.fiu.edu Fred McManus US-EPA, Region IV Wetlands Branch 61 Forsyth St. Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 7 May 2003 Re: Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report Dear Mr. McManus: This letter serves to transmit the Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report as per our EPA Agreement #X994621-94-0. This report consists of this letter along with corresponding table and figures. Project Background This report includes cumulative water quality and bacteriological data from 9 stations within the Little Venice subdivision collected during the period of record May 2001 December 2002 (Fig. 1). Water was collected weekly for bacteriological analysis by SYNAGRO for enumeration of fecal coliform and enterococci (counts per 100 ml). Field parameters collected weekly at both the surface and bottom of the water column at each station include salinity (psu), temperature ( C), and dissolved oxygen (DO; mg l -1 ). Water quality parameters monitored weekly at each station include total nitrogen (), total phosphorus (), and chlorophyll a (; µg l -1 ). Monthly monitoring at each station included the dissolved nutrients nitrate+nitrite (NO x ), nitrite (NO 2 ), nitrate (NO 3 ), ammonium (NH 4 ), inorganic nitrogen (DIN), soluble reactive phosphate (SRP), and silicate (Si(OH) 4 ). Concentrations for all of these variables are reported in unless noted otherwise. In addition, monthly deployment of ISCO autosamplers at rotating sites were programmed to collect 12 samples per day over a 2 day period. These samples were

analyzed for and. Hydrolab datasondes accompanied the autosamplers to measure and log temperature, salinity, DO, and ph on an hourly basis. Results Figures 2-10 show bacterial counts for the canal stations for the complete period of record. The FL state standard for single counts of fecal coliforms in bathing waters is 800 counts/100ml while the EPA recommended standard for enterococci is 104 counts/100ml. Fecal coliform counts exceeded the FL state standard 0 times while enterococci counts exceeded EPA recommended standards 48 times over the period of record. One of the most interesting aspects of the bacteriological data is the growing evidence of a seasonal cycle in enterococci numbers. Figures 11-19 show time series of,,, salinity, and DO at all stations. The heads of the canals generally have the highest, and (Fig. 20) and lowest DO (Fig. 21). State of Florida Rule 62-3030, for Class II marine waters specifies that DO shall never be less than mg l -1. To date there have been 397 surface DO and 438 bottom DO values below the State standard. As to nutrient criteria, there is no standard for Florida marine waters. However, State of Florida Rule 62-02.300(13), F.A.C. states that particular consideration shall be given to the protection from nutrient enrichment of those presently containing very low nutrient concentrations: less than 0.3 milligrams per liter total nitrogen or less than 4 milligrams per liter total phosphorus. Therefore, these benchmarks are included in the and graphs for illustrative purposes only. If you have any questions about the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 305-348-4076, boyerj@fiu.edu or Ron Jones at 305-348-6472. Sincerely, Ronald Jones, Ph.D. Director and Professor Joseph N. Boyer, Ph.D. Associate Scientist

Figure 1.

Sta 1 - Mouth of 112th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 2 Sta 3 - Head of 112th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 3 Sta 2 - Nearshore of 100th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Mar-03 Apr-03 May-03 Jun-03 Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 4

Sta 4 - Mouth of 100th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 5 Sta 5 - Head of 100th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 6 Sta 6 - Mouth of 97th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 7

Sta 7 - Head of 97th St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 8 Sta 8 - Mouth of 91st St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 9 Sta 9 - Head of 91st St. Canal log CFU/100 ml Fecal Coliform Enterococci Figure 10

Figure 11 Sta. 1 - Mouth of the 112th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 12 Sta. 3 - Head of the 112th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 13 Sta. 2 - Nearshore of the 100th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 14 Sta. 4 - Mouth of the 100th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 15 Sta. 5 - Head of the 100th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 1 1 1 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 16 Sta. 6 - Mouth of the 97th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 5.0 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 17 Sta. 7 - Head of the 97th Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 1 2 3 4 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 18 Sta. 8 - Mouth of the 91st Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 5.0 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

Figure 19 Sta. 9 - Head of the 91st Street Canal 0.6 0.8 1.2 0 2 4 6 8 5.0 1 15.0 2 25.0 3 µg l -1 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Salinity 1 mg l -1 DO

0.6 0.3 0.1 0 Head Mouth Offshore 3 2 1 0 Head Mouth Offshore 7.0 5.0 µg/l Head Mouth Offshore Figure 20

mg/l 7.0 5.0 Surface DO Head Mouth Offshore mg/l 7.0 5.0 Head Mouth Offshore Figure 21 Bottom DO