INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE

Similar documents
Biosphere Reserves of India : Complete Study Notes

The website of the journal is (from 2008):

The Design of Nature Reserves

Birding tourism at Kaziranga National Park, India ecotourism contributing to conservation

LEAFLET FEBRUARY. WWF-Greater Mekong DAWNA TENASSERIM LANDSCAPE. Wayuphong Jitvijak / WWF-Thailand

Wild Life Reserves in India From the Esri India GeoInquiries

You can learn more about the trail camera project and help identify animals at WildCam Gorongosa (

Case Study: Conserving Ecological Processes in the Eastern Himalayas

Union of Myanmar Forest Department

JIM CORBETT NATIONAL PARK OF INDIA - A CASE STUDY ON PROJECT TIGER RESERVES

Protected Area Management Effectiveness Nepal s Experience

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

Keeping Wilderness Wild: Increasing Effectiveness With Limited Resources

Kangchenjunga Transboundary Conservation and Development Initiative in the Hindu Kush Himalayas

TEN DAYS WILDLIFE TOUR COCHIN PERIYAR-MUNNAR-CHINNAR-ANAMALAI- MUDUMALI-BANDIPUR-KABINI

TIGERS, LIONS & RHINOS OF INDIA

Terrestrial Protected Area Nomination: Central Mangrove Wetland South-West, Grand Cayman

Wildlife Safari. Itinerary. Where are we visiting? Bombay-Nagpur-Pench- Kanha-Nagpur-Kaziranga- Bombay. 8 days. From: US $2,100

BOR WILDLIFE SANCTUARY

Important National park of India

Conservation Partners for the National Reserve System Program: a Western NSW focus

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Large Mammals and Birds in Eco-Tourism Zone of Nanda Devi National Park

Kaziranga National Park

Development of Ski Resorts in the Indian Himalayas

STORNETTA BROTHERS COASTAL RANCH

Tigers & Forts of Central India Mumbai Kanha Bandhavgarh Maheshwar Mumbai DAY 1 ARRIVE MUMBAI

Current conditions. Guatemala's Maya Biosphere Reserve. No clear idea of speed of deforestation. Deforestion by pollen analysis

Strengthening biodiversity conservation through community oriented development projects An environmental review of the India Ecodevelopment Project

Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

Title/Name of the area: Chwaka Bay, Zanzibar

June 29 th 2015 SOS LEMURS SPECIAL INITIATIVE

According to a Cree Indian

Creation of a Community-managed Biodiversity Park in the Saloum Delta of Senegal. Voré Gana Seck Director GREEN Senegal for People, Land, Ocean

Twelve Apostles Marine National Park Australia

Nokrek Biosphere Reserve. speak in a broad sense, speaking on behalf of the entire earth being a biosphere in which the global

BIODIVERSITY AND WILDLIFE ANIMALS IN SEMARSOT SANCTUARY IN DISTRICT BALRAMPUR CHHATTISGARH.

Use of Wetlands for Sustainable Tourism Management

UNIT 5 AFRICA PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY SG 1 - PART II

Bedfordshire and Luton Species Action Plan: Hazel Dormouse

628: BELOVEZHSKAYA PUSHCHA STATE NATIONAL PARK (BELARUS)

12 NIGHT/13 DAY FAMILY SAFARI NORTHERN TANZANIA

ALBERTA S GRASSLANDS IN CONTEXT

Wildlife Tour of South India

Priority Species, Communities, Ecosystems, and Threats

2.0 Physical Characteristics

Malua Biobank Operations Report. Submitted by the Sabah Forestry Department May June 2009

Prominence of Problem Behaviors among Visitors to Maasai Mara Game Reserve in Kenya: Revelations of Wardens

Preliminary report on the apex predators of Banhine National Park and the potential Limpopo-Banhine corridor

National parks in India are IUCN category II (National Park) protected areas.

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 7, No 5, 2018,

STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN MYANMAR. Thein Aung Assistant Director, Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division, Forest Department.

Hindu Kush Karakorum Pamir Landscape Initiative (HKPL)

Backgrounder Plains Bison Reintroduction to Banff National Park

ABCG Presentation, Washington DC: Increasing Conservation Land, Wildlife Protection and Benefits to Landowners

Levels of wildlife/biodiversity conservation

The Return of the Nature s Guard: Endangered Vulture s Population on Rise in Rajaji National Park, North India

Dooars Tourist attractions


BY Saurabh Pandey Junior research fellow(jrf) NET, MA, B.TECH 3 Years teaching experience UPSC Faculty

Essential Botswana. Sample Itinerary

IMPACTS OF THE RECENT TSUNAMI ON THE BUNDALA NATIONAL PARK THE FIRST RAMSAR WETLAND IN SRI LANKA

Draft Resolution on wetlands in polar and subpolar regions

The Conservation Contributions of Ecotourism Cassandra Wardle

UPDATE ON CENTRAL KALAHARI GAME RESERVE BLUE WILDEBEEST STUDY

Save the Tiger. 15 Days

Reconciling Conservation and Investment in the Gambella Omo Landscape, Ethiopia

Cheshire Ecology Ltd.

WILDLIFE REPORT SINGITA LAMAI, TANZANIA For the month of October, Two Thousand and Fifteen

REINTRODUCTION OF TIGERS IN SARISKA TIGER RESERVE, RAJASTHAN Experience & Lessons Learnt Dr.K.Sankar Wildlife Institute of India

STREAKED HORNED LARK. Conservation of a threatened species in an industrial landscape. Cat Brown US Fish and Wildlife Service

Settlement Patterns West of Ma ax Na, Belize

Nepal - Terai Mammals Chitwan NP & Bardia NP. Contents. Introduction. Logistics. 26/04/2013 to 04/05/2013 (9 days) Jeff Blincow

Ekuthuleni Lodge - Welgevonden Game Reserve

6. Involving the local population in park management. 7. Involving local NGO s and researchers in park activities and management.

Land Use. Grasslands and Rangelands National Parks and Reserves. Thursday, October 9, 14

THE GRAND ADVENTURER

Saving the Monarch Butterfly

WORKSHEET 1 Wilderness Qualities or Attributes Evaluating the Effects of Project Activities on Wilderness Attributes

The following criteria were used to identify Benchmark Areas:

Witness the unfolding beauty of nature at the heart of the Jungle. Unblemished by time

Communities and conservation in West Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Participation, costs and benefits

PROPOSED QUARRY FOOTPRINT PHASE 2 PHASE 3. PHASE 5 West. PHASE 5 East. PHASE 6 West. PHASE 6 East PHASE 7 PHASE 4 PHASE 1

Appendix 8.D Water Vole and Otter Survey Report

South Asia Wildlife Spectacular

Festive Tour Between 01-Nov-14 AND 09-Nov-14

Kerala Backwater & Beach 9nights/ 10days

APPENDIX G ECOLOGICAL REPORTS. G.2 Badger

Tiger Alive Initiative s 12 Tiger Landscapes

The Andean Bears at Inkaterra Machu Picchu Hotel

Labrador - Island Transmission Link Target Rare Plant Survey Locations

State of Nature 2016

Draft Resolution on wetlands in polar and subpolar regions

CHITWAN NATIONAL PARK EXTENSION

Mount Nimba Ecosystem

THE INFLUENCE OF LARGE ANIMAL DIVERSITY IN GRAZED ECOSYSTEMS. Abstract

Jozani Forest: A Magnificent Nature Walk On Exotic Zanzibar

AT A GLANCE ITINERARY

A diurnal observation of Small-toothed Palm Civets Arctogalidia trivirgata mating in Seima Protection Forest, Mondulkiri province, Cambodia

State of Conservation Report Sagarmatha National Park (Nepal) (N 120)

Kangaroo Island Koalas and Conservation

Transcription:

ISSN: 2067-533X INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE Volume 4, Issue 2, April-June 2013: 243-249 www.ijcs.uaic.ro ASSESSMENT OF SWAMP DEER HABITAT IN AND AROUND JHILMIL JHEEL CONSERVATION RESERVE, HARIDWAR, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA Rachna TEWARI *1, Gopal Singh RAWAT 1, 2 1 Wildlife Institute of India, P.O.Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun, India 2 International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, GPO Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal Abstract Swamp deer (Rucervus duvaucelii duvaucelii) or Barasingha is categorized as vulnerable on the IUCN Red list. With a global population of less than 5,000 the species has a very limited distribution spanning over 2,000 km 2 in India and Nepal. A small population of swamp deer was recently rediscovered in Uttarakhand state at Jhilmil Jheel. This population warranted a conservation initiative because the habitat around this Conservation Reserve is heavily fragmented due to expansion of agriculture, habitation and various other land use practices. The reserve provides an area of only 0.009 km 2 per animal, which is insufficient in maintaining a viable population of swamp deer. It is therefore important to identify further potential habitat and to begin linkages between existing and potential habitats. A habitat conservation evaluation can play a key role in influencing conservation strategies by conducting detailed research including identification of potential habitat blocks and suggesting linkages between existing and adjacent potential habitat blocks. In this way the initiative can help to increase the number of swamp deer and to maintain a viable population of the species. Keywords: Habitat evaluation; home range; linkage; potential habitat; swamp deer. Introduction Swamp deer lives in the swampy grasslands and floodplains of Indian sub continent, and also utilizes surrounding riverine forests and woodlands. It is highly dependent on the availability of water. Swamp deer is mainly a grazer, eating grass and leafy aquatic vegetation. It feeds mainly in the morning and evenings, and in the midday heat it retreats to the shade or rest in the open. Where there is substantial human disturbance, the swamp deer is mainly nocturnal. Swamp deer is listed by IUCN, with the few remaining populations declining or already affected by habitat fragmentation due to expansion of agriculture, habitation and various other land use practices [1, 2]. The total world population of swamp deer is estimated less than 5,000 animals, occupying an area of less than 2,000 km² in India and Nepal (Fig. 1). The species is extinct in Pakistan and Bangladesh [3]. A small population of swamp deer (320 in number) was recently rediscovered in Uttarakhand state (in 2005) at Jhilmil Jheel [4]. * Corresponding author: rachna_fri@yahoo.co.in

R.TEWARI and G.S. RAWAT At the time of rediscovery of swamp deer around Jhilmil Jheel in the year 2005 itself, it was realized that the habitat was too small in comparison to the need of swamp deer and other large herbivores. So a need was felt to assess the conservation reserve area as well as adjoining areas for identification of potential habitat blocks. Once these habitat blocks are demarcated, the next step will be to suggest the means of establishing linkage of the presently available habitat with neighbouring Terai habitat for future conservation in perpetuity. Fig. 1. Map showing past and present distribution range of swamp deer Study area Jhilmil Jheel is a saucer shaped wetland located between Haridwar Najimabad highway and the River Ganges, in Chidiyapur Range of Haridwar Division, Uttarakhand, covering an area of 37.83 km² of Reserve Forest and elevation ranging from 200 to 250 meters above MSL [5]. The spectacular terai landscape of the study area is a mosaic of short and tall grasslands, tropical mixed moist deciduous forests, and secondary scrub (Fig. 2). The area experiences sub-tropical climate. Annual rainfall averages about 1300 mm (recorded between 1997 and 2007) and is most prominent during June-September (monsoon). Temperature soars 244 INT J CONSERV SCI 4, 2, APR-JUN 2013: 243-249

ASSESSMENT OF SWAMP DEER HABITAT IN AND AROUND JHILMIL JHEEL, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA up to 44 C in May and drops to 2 C in January. The texture of the soil varies from fine sand to clayey loam. The area is rich in faunal and floral diversity including spotted deer, elephant, blue bull, wild boar, monkey, langur, mongoose, hare, common leopard and occasionally tiger, jungle cat, otter, porcupine, sambar, barking deer and hog deer are also seen in the area. Avifauna includes a large number of resident and winter migratory birds. Fig. 2. Location map of Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 245

R.TEWARI and G.S. RAWAT The dominant vegetation types include Typha elephantina, Phragmites karka, Imperata cylindrica, Vetiveria zizanioides, Zizyphus mauritiana and Salix tetrasperma. The local inhabitants of Tantwala village, adjacent to Jhilmil Jheel consist of 146 households. They are of different communities viz., Punjabis, Sainis, Garhwalis, and Gujjars who settled here in early 1950 s. Before the enforcement of Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, limited wildlife shooting was permitted here. The working plans in the initial 70-80 years of the management history aimed only at obtaining more revenue out of the forest wealth. Later in 1973 s onward there was a shift; with inclusion of wildlife conservation initiatives in the working plans (B.K.P.Sinha plan of 1973-89). On August 05, 2005 the government of Uttarakhand declared the area as a Conservation Reserve. Before this declaration people (villagers and illegally settled nomads, gujjars ) were freely grazing their livestock in the grasslands of Jhilmil Jheel area. Later, gujjars were rehabilitated outside of reserve area along the River Rawasan. Threats to swamp deer and its habitat in and around Jhilmil Jheel Swamp deer is an exacting species and needs its traditional wintering and feeding grounds to be restored to it [6]. It is surviving at Jhilmil Jheel in an island habitat surrounded by various land use/ land cover types. The most essential cover requirements (viz. forage, hiding etc.) of its crucial phase of life cycle are at risk in the existing situation. The annual composite home range of herds ranges from 10-30 km². Swamp deer on an average move 2-3 km (straight line) daily and known to move distances of 5-7 km during seasonal shifts of habitat [7, 8, 9, 10, and 11]. Whereas, the area available to the swamp deer is 2.9 km² (which includes Jhilmil Jheel, the prime swamp deer habitat of 0.5 km² area and the surrounding agricultural fields, scrub, grasslands and forest). Individually, Jhilmil Jheel is not large enough to support self sustaining populations for long; they may be dependent on adjoining patches [12]. There are some habitat blocks in the reserve area itself (viz. riverine forest, plantations and sandy river bed) which have been reported (riverine forest-martin 1977 [7], plantations-qureshi et al. 1995 [11], sandy river bed-schaller 1967 [13]) as being used by swamp deer during various phases of their life cycle. These parts of the reserve cannot be used by the animal due to fragmentation (Fig. 3). Fig. 3. Map of JJCR showing potential habitat blocks 246 INT J CONSERV SCI 4, 2, APR-JUN 2013: 243-249

ASSESSMENT OF SWAMP DEER HABITAT IN AND AROUND JHILMIL JHEEL, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA On the western bank of the river Ganges, is located Banganga Wetland (Fig. 4) with a small population of swamp deer (approximately 100). Banganga wetland harbours Typha islands, Phragmites islands and several other aquatic plant species. Jhilmil and Banganga wetland are also not connected and the resident swamp deer populations are presumed isolated. The grasslands and woodland of the Conservation Reserve also have large cattle and human population dependent on resources of these patches in terms of fodder, fuelwood, and timber requirements. High dependency of local people on resources of these natural tracts poses severe threats to ungulate community and their long term conservation. Fig. 4. Map showing location of Jhilmil Jheel and Banganga Wetland Recommended strategies If we intend to conserve this threatened species in its western most range, improvement of the habitat conditions of this region is required. As a first step, the area in and around Conservation Reserve will be assessed for identification of potential habitat blocks. Next, means of establishing linkage of the presently available habitat with neighboring Terai habitat will be suggested. It is presumed that increasing the connectivity between the isolated patches may counteract the adverse effects of fragmentation on swamp deer. http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 247

R.TEWARI and G.S. RAWAT Thus we recommend that connectivity can be achieved in two steps: Step 1: Providing connectivity between the potential habitat blocks and prime swamp deer habitat of Conservation Reserve by evacuating adjoining agricultural fields of Tantwala village and the Gujjar deras : Relocation of selected agricultural fields of Tantwala village and gujjar deras adjoining to the prime swamp deer habitat is crucial to the swamp deer conservation as it shall provide unhindered access to the swamp deer populations right up to the Ganges and will add an area of 18.5 km 2 to the available 2.9 km 2 habitat (Fig. 3). The evicted parts of village and agricultural fields would have to be cleaned of village and household debris etc so that the grassland habitat and water bodies are restored. Eventually an area of approximately 21.4 km 2 will be available for conservation purposes, free from all human encumbrances. It is going to be a contiguous habitat dedicated to conservation of terai ecosystem in Uttarakhand. As a matter of fact this relocation is voluntary as well as incentised. Farmers have observed a lower agriculture yield here due to excessively high water table. So they readily want to move out from this village. On top of this, villagers are being relocated to a place next to national highway. Step 2: Developing corridor between Jhilmil Jheel and Banganga Wetland: The villages on the western bank of river Ganges between the river and Banganga wetland are required to be relocated on a similar pattern as of Jhilmil (Fig. 4). Conclusions It has been recognized that this Conservation Reserve has high dependency of local people. So, the conservation of flagship species, swamp deer, is only possible if the interests of local communities are taken care of. Also cooperation of eco-development committee of the area is of immense help for spreading awareness regarding wildlife conservation. Thus swamp deer conservation requires long term monitoring, meticulous planning and intensive management action. Acknowledgments We are thankful to the Uttarakhand Forest department for granting permission to work in the area and providing financial assistance for this work. We are also thankful to our field assistants, who spent their sweat and blood with us for successful completion of this project. We are grateful to WII staff of computer cell, library, and herbarium. We acknowledge frontline staff of Haridwar Division for providing great hospitality and love during the stay at Jhilmil. Thanks are due to Director, WII and Dean, Faculty of Wildlife Sciences, WII for providing infra-structural facilities at WII. References [1] J.W. Duckworth, N.S. Kumar, C.P. Pokharel, H.S. Baral, R.J. Timmins, Rucervus duvaucelii, IUCN 2012, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2008. [2] N. Midha, P.K. Mathur, Conservation implications of the channel changes in Sharda River on endangered swamp deer population and floodplain ecosystem in Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary, Uttar Pradesh, India, Current Science, 98(5), 2010, pp. 665-672. [3] Q. Qureshi, V.B. Sawarkar, A.R. Rahmani, P.K. Mathur, Swamp deer or barasingha (Cervus duvauceli Cuvier, 1823), Ungulates of India (Eds. K. Sankar and S.P. Goyal) Envis Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, (Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun), 7(1), India, 2004, pp. 181-192. 248 INT J CONSERV SCI 4, 2, APR-JUN 2013: 243-249

ASSESSMENT OF SWAMP DEER HABITAT IN AND AROUND JHILMIL JHEEL, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA [4] S.P. Sinha, S.S. Chandola, Swamp deer sighting in Uttaranchal State, India, Oryx, 40(1), 2006, pp. 14-14. [5] ***, Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve, Forest Department, Government of Uttaranchal, 2005. [6] K. Ahmed, J.A. Khan, Status, population structure and conservation of swamp deer (Cervus duvauceli duvauceli) in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, Uttar Pradesh, India, International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 34(2), 2008, pp. 75-82. [7] C. Martin, Status and ecology of the Barasingha (Cervus duvauceli branderi) in Kanha National Park (India), Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 74, 1977, pp. 60-132. [8] D. Schaff, Population size and structure and habitat relations of the Barasingha (Cervus d. duvauceli) in Suklaphanta wildlife reserve Nepal, Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University USA, 1978. [9] V.P. Singh, Bio-ecological studies on Cervus duvauceli duvauceli, swamp deer (Barasingha) in Dudhwa forest near Indo-Nepal border, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kanpur University, 1984. [10] R. Sankaran, Status of the swamp deer in Dudhwa National Park (1988-1989), Technical Report, 14, Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay, 1989. [11] Q. Qureshi, V.B. Sawarkar, P.K. Mathur, Ecology and Management of swamp deer in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, U.P (India), Project Report, Wildlife Institute of India Dehradun, 1995. [12] S. Nandy, S.P.S. Kushwaha, P. Gaur, Identification of Swamp Deer (Cervus duvauceli duvauceli Cuvier) Potential Habitat in Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve, Uttarakhand, India Using Multi-Criteria Analysis, Environmental Management, 49(4), 2012, pp. 902-914. [13] G. B. Schaller, The deer and the tiger, Chicago University Press, 1967. Received: September, 13, 2012 Accepted: March, 23, 2013 http://www.ijcs.uaic.ro 249