Destination Performance 2012

Similar documents
Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

West Somerset 2015 Local data version

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Hertfordshire Business Barometer September 2018

Hertfordshire Business Barometer July 2018

Hertfordshire Business Barometer April 2018

European Tourism Indicator System DESTINATION PROFILE FORM

Kent Visitor Economy Barometer 2016

OVERVIEW. Currently South Australia contributes $6.3 billion to the Australian tourism economy.

Kent Business Barometer December 2018

Tourism in South Africa A statistical overview

January 2018 Air Traffic Activity Summary

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Thanet Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research October 2018

Tourism activity supports 60,007 full-time equivalent jobs locally

Loudon County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Loudon County (Loudon and Lenoir City areas)

Maury County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Maury County (Columbia and Spring Hill area)

Tourism Statistics

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Cheatham County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, 2006

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Visit Wales Research Update

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

Driving Customer Satisfaction

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The contribution of Tourism to the Greek economy in 2017

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2015

The Economic Impact of West Oxfordshire s Visitor Economy 2016

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2013 Visitor Profile

Tourism in Eastern Scotland 2010 Edinburgh & Lothian's, Angus & Dundee, Perthshire and the Kingdom of Fife

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Tourism Business Monitor Accommodation Report. Wave 2 Post-Easter holidays

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

ST. EUSTATIUS. Sea Arrivals ( Summer ( Winter Yacht Arrivals 11, % 32.1%

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

ANGUILLA TOURISM HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2006 VISITOR ARRIVALS 72, % 60.1% Same Day Visitors 94,283. Tourist Arrivals I ( Winter ( Summer

Self Catering Holidays in England Economic Impact 2015

The tourism value of the natural environment and outdoor activities in

visitor insights 2016

Youth/Backpacker Visitation to the Northern Territory. Year ending June 2017

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau November 2012 Visitor Profile

FALKLAND ISLANDS International Tourism Statistics Report 2012

BUSINESS BAROMETER. Annual report Credit: Robby Whiitfield

Coast to coast. STR Coastal Town Review Coastal Towns Market Review Report_JE.indd 3

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau September 2013 Visitor Profile

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

JAMAICA. Cruise Passengers 1,678, % 35.7% Cruise Calls VISITOR PROFILE % 5.7% 15.5% TOURISM AND OTHER RELATED ECONOMIC STATISTICS

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at: Chile

From: OECD Tourism Trends and Policies Access the complete publication at:

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

DTTAS Quarterly Aviation Statistics Snapshot Quarter Report

International Visitation to the Northern Territory. Year ending September 2017

AUCKLAND DESTINATION OVERVIEW

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau March 2013 Visitor Profile

Measures & Projections October 31, GoToBermuda.com

Visit Kent Business Barometer: July 2017

Estonia. Tourism in the economy. Tourism governance and funding

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Tourism Business Monitor Accommodation Report. Wave 3 Post-Easter until mid-july

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2014

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2014 Visitor Profile

Jan-18. Dec-17. Travel is expected to grow over the coming 6 months; at a slower rate

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TOURIST EXPENDITURE 31 Average Spend per Person per Night ( ) 31 Tourist Expenditure per Annum ( ) 32

Sweden. Swedish Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

ANNUAL TOURISM REPORTING - DATA SHEETS COUNTRY: The statistical data provided in the tables below shall cover the year 2014 and, if available, 2015.

Total expenditure by international tourists visiting Spain in February increases by 2.9% compared with the same month of 2018

Total expenditure by international tourists visiting Spain in August increases by 3.8% compared with the same month last year

REPORT. VisitEngland Business Confidence Monitor Wave 5 Autumn

Norway MARKET REVIEW Norwegian Visitors in Finland Statistical Trends and Profile

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

tourism in figures 2010

Latest Tourism Trends. Humphrey Walwyn Head of VisitEngland Research

OVERVIEW Four year annual average to the year ending September 2014

Tourism Rotorua Travel Office (51)

GIPPSLAND TOURISM MASTER PLAN

TOURISM PERFORMANCE 2017

April 2011 Visitor Profile

Transcription:

Destination Performance 2012 Sample Council City 2 Prepared by: TSE Research www.tourismsoutheast.com

Contextual Information Welcome to the Destination Intelligence report for British Destinations members. The information contained in this report comes from a variety of sources. For the past 10 years members of British Destinations (and formerly Destination Performance UK) have been able to participate in an annual 'destination intelligence' survey. The survey aims to capture the key data collected at the destination/county/dmo level considered to be required to understand, monitor and manage performance. The Destination Intelligence report is complemented with statistics from the recently launched Destination Intelligence System (DIS), a database of tourism statistics and research for English tourism destinations (http://www.tstatsuk.co.uk/visitengland/) Where available, the report includes average results for the destination category, county, region or England levels, for benchmarking purposes. Should you have any queries with this Destination Intelligence report please contact Sergi Jarques at Tourism South East on 01206 392528, sjarques@tourismse.com. Name of / Organisation British Destinations Category City 2 Basic Information Sample Council Size of destination Contact Name Name Surname 87 Km2 Telephone Number 01234 567 890 Resident Population Contact Email address email@email.com 247,000 Residents Service Title % Population Tourism function location Tourism & Leisure employed in tourism Type of Council / Organisation Unitary FTE staff employed in department 18 related jobs 12% Budget / Expenditure Net Tourism Expenditure 2011/2012 as identified in line I40 of CIPFA s RO 5 908,660 Net expenditure on tourism per day visitor Net expenditure on tourism per staying visitor 1 Net expenditure on tourism per head of population 4 Public Sector Grants 2011/2012 Sales Commission Income 2011/2012 157,000 Sponsorship 2011/2012 Additional Sources of Income 2011/2012 143,000 Physical characteristics of the destination and outlineof particular geographic features Seafront location, overlooking the English Channel, backed by the South Downs.

Tourism Activity Management Destination Profile City 1 to 3 Tourism Marketing Conference Venues Conference Marketing Tourist/Visitor Information Centres Business Development services Destination Management System Membership scheme Product Development Events Car Parks Beach Services Attractions Museums Illuminations Beach Huts Harbour Toilets Caravan Sites Tourism Services 2 4 6 8 10 DMO/DMP/ATP Level of biodiversity MEDIUM Dominant habitats in the destination Predominant ttypes of tourismi Urban YES Sand/shingle beach YES Beach YES Moor/heath land City Break YES Farmland Cultural YES Forest/Woodland Rural Alpine Wilderness Scrubland Winter Sport Wetland : 0 How long has the destination been popular with tourists? 150 years Five most popular tourist attractions Most popular activities in your destination Modes to reach destination Beach visits YES Train YES Attraction Name Shopping YES Tram Attraction Name Sightseeing YES Coach YES Attraction Name Hiking Bus YES Attraction Name Water sports YES Taxi YES Attraction Name Farm stays Ferry : YES Cruise lines Eating and drinking Air carriers YES

Tourist / Visitor Information Centres TIC Performance No. of Networked TICs. No. of NonNetworked TICs Total Footfall for 2011/2012 Method of collecting footfall data No. of Telephone Calls for 2011/2012 No. of Letter/Faxes for 2011/2012 No. of Emails for 2011/2012 No. of Accommodation bookings taken Value of Accommodation bookings taken Value of other additional income 1 0 371,365 People counter at entrance 17,460 902 12,306 833 101,151 281,886 City 1 to 3 1.4 0 185,351 N/A 10,335 1,874 5,215 649 49,176 153,716 3 1 174,341 N/A 11,438 1,460 4,793 421 21,278 155,941 TIC Customer Satisfaction Speed of Service 4.56 Quality of Customer Service 4.69 Range of Information Available 4.69 Goods & Services for sale 4.37 Signposting (Easy to find TIC) 4.61 Accessibility (Easy of entry) 4.83 Overall Impression 4.57 4.09 4.28 4.25 4.58 4.54 4.54 4.83 Type of Website: Destination Management System All data relates to calendar year 2012 City 1 to 3 Total unique visits to website homepage Total number of visits to website Total number of page views to website 726,530 2,151,286 8,789,237 620,114 1,321,043 6,334,070 786,658 1,192,387 5,083,637 Busiest day of the week Most viewed page of site Monday home page Average dwell time per visit (minutes) Income generated via advertising % users who rate website as good or excellent 3.00 8,000 88% 7 22,250 91% 4.51 12,523 61% Tourism Enterpise(s) Serviced Accommodation NonServiced Accommodation Total % assessed Total % assessed Number of establishments 191 71% 39 62% Number of rooms 4256 79% 626 85% Number of bed spaces 8854 8 1133 62% Approximate number of restaurants. 500 % restaurant and hotels inspected for fire Number bars, nightclubs, pubs etc. 2000 safety and food handling safety

Monthly room occupancy by location type (average 2009 2011) 80 70 60 50 40 Coastal City / Large Town Small Town Countryside 30 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual occupancy serviced accommodation Number of visitor beds available in commercial accommodation per 100 residents 72% 4.93 Average REV Par (revenue per available room) 2012 59.90 Tourism Flow and Economic Value The number of day and overnight visitors is a primary indicator of the importance of tourism in the destination. Whilst overnight visitors have a higher average trip spend, day visitors are often important to retailers. Monitoring tourism spending is a good way of showing the direct economic impact generated by visitors Moreover, the total value of tourism (including indirect and induced expenditure) and GDP (Gross Domestic Product) are useful indicators to measure the economic contribution of tourism to the local economy. Number of overnight tourism trips Value of staying visitor spend () Number of annual 'same day' visitors Daily spending per same day visitor Total value of tourism Relative contribution to local economy (% GDP) Average length of stay of tourists (nights) Average length of stay of same day visitors (hours) Tourism employment as % of total employment Percentage of jobs in tourism that are seasonal Number of tourists/visitors per 100 residents Percentage of residents satisfied with tourism 1,399,000 1,276,101 101 466,097,000 245,183,234 7,119,000 12,972,904 271,379,000 469,966,152 737,478,000 870,825,471 8% 3 nights 3.25 nights 5 hours 5 hours 14% 15.3% 20.5% 3,449 4,596 5 333.16 Average expenditure per overnight trip 192.13 England 256.21

Sustainable Management A number of necessary steps are needed to achieve longterm sustainability and include planning and consultation, community involvement, certification and visitor experience. This section seeks to determine if: The destination has a sustainable tourism policy and actionable plan Interested residents are able to engaged with tourism planning, All communities are represented in the management plans Enterprises have independent verification of their sustainability practices Visitors are satisfied with their visit and if they are likely to return within 5 years. % destination with a sustainable tourism strategy/action plan. % destination represented by a destination management organisation % residents satisfied with involvement in planning / development of tourism Percentage enterprises/establishments using a voluntary verified certification / labelling for environmental/quality/sustainability and/or CSR (Corporate Social Number of tourism enterprises/establishments with sustainability reports in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Visitor Satisfaction (VisitEngland Tracker) Overall Experience rated Excellent and Good (%) Recommended to Friends and Family rated Definitely and Probably (%) Liklihood of Returning rated Definitely and Probably (%) How it compares to other destinations Much Better and Slightly Better (%) 87% 87% 78% 66% 67% 72% 42% 27% England 85% 86% 76% 62% Responsible purchasing helps to strengthen local economies and reduce environmental impacts. Sourcing local products increases the economic value of tourism. Percentage of tourism enterprises sourcing local, sustainable, or fair trade goods and services Percentage of the destination covered by a policy promoting local, sustainable and fair trade products and services Percentage of tourism establishments sourcing a minimum of 25% of food and drink from local/regional producers Percentage of commercial accommodation with rooms accessible to people with disabilities and/or participating in recognised accessibility schemes Percentage of visitor attractions that are accessible and/or participating in recognised accessibility schemes Average travel (km) by overnight visitors to and from home /previous destination Average travel (km) by same day visitors from and to destination Percentage of destination designated for protection (National Park, AONB, SSSI, etc) Biodiversity monitoring plan in place for key species (Yes / No) Requirement for tourism enterprises to minimise light and noise pollution (Yes / No) % population covered by local strategy and/or plans to reduce noise and light pollution 5% FALSE No