GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT

Similar documents
SAFETY & AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS LEGISLATIVE & REGULATORY ADVOCACY NETWORKING & COMMERCE EDUCATION & CAREER DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA L- +: i DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D. C.

FEDEX - OVERNIGHT MAIL, CERTIFIED MAIL-RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL JAN

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 12 th day of February, 2016 FINAL ORDER ISSUING INTERSTATE CERTIFICATE

Corporate Shuttle 2.0

Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements for Air Carrier Operations; Technical

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 28 th day of January, 2016 FINAL ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedure Manual

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS WASHINGTON, DC. March 4, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Ownership Options for the HondaJet Explained

The New Aircraft Charter Rules: A Deep Dive!

AC 91-37A Truth in Leasing

RE: Docket Number DOT-OST ; RIN: 2105-AD66 Notice of proposed rulemaking, Enhanced Consumer Protections for Charter Air Transportation

MEMORANDUM FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2014

Advice for brokers about the ATOL Regulations and the ATOL scheme

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 26 th day of May, 2015

Enhanced Consumer Protections for Charter Air Transportation. AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), U.S. Department of Transportation

Revisions to Denied Boarding Compensation, Domestic Baggage Liability Limits, Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (DOT).

Criteria for an application for and grant of, or a variation to, an ATOL: fitness, competence and Accountable Person

RE: Draft AC , titled Determining the Classification of a Change to Type Design

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Reporting Instructions FILING REQUIREMENTS

Working Draft: Time-share Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue. Financial Reporting Center Revenue Recognition

PRIVATE AIRCRAFT Ownership, Fractional, Jet Card or Charter?

2. The Approach under consideration will expose the public to significant risks.

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS PART 10 COMMERCIAL AIR TRANSPORT BY FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS WITHIN FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

US Aviation Regulatory Update: A Review of 2010, and Issues to Watch

AGENCY AGREEMENT. The definitions used in this agreement have the same meaning as those used in the ATOL Regulations 2012.

TITLE 20 AERONAUTICS

Is the IRS Really Imposing FET on Managed Part 91 Aircraft?!

AIRPORT NOISE AND CAPACITY ACT OF 1990

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

AFRICAN AIR TRANSPORT AND THE PROTECTON OF THE CONSUMER

2. CANCELLATION. AC 39-7B, Airworthiness Directives, dated April 8, 1987, is canceled.

CHG 0 9/13/2007 VOLUME 2 AIR OPERATOR AND AIR AGENCY CERTIFICATION AND APPLICATION PROCESS

NBAA CONNECTIVITY SURVEY RESULTS

BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Strategies for Sharing a Business Aircraft

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS WASHINGTON, D.C.

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

GUYANA CIVIL AVIATION REGULATION PART X- FOREIGN OPERATORS.

LEASING, BUYING AND CHARTERING AIRCRAFT

Advisory Circular AC19-1. Test Pilot Approvals 03 July Revision 0

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Submitted by the Aviation Suppliers Association 2233 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Suite 503 Washington, DC 20007

Advisory Circular. Application Guidelines for Helicopter FAA to TCCA Licence Conversion Agreement. Z U Issue No.: 01

Settlement Policy for Commercial Pilots In Drug and Alcohol Testing Cases

Advisory Circular. Canada and United States Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement Maintenance Implementation Procedures

4.2 Regional Air Navigation/Safety Developments and Achievements. Group (NAM/CAR ANI/WG) INTEGRATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS)

Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.

ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION

BEST PRACTICES FOR BUSINESS AVIATION SECURITY

DGCA Indonesia CASR Part Amendment 8 Flight Time, Duty Time and Rest Requirements

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

COVER SHEET. Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Information Sheet Part 91 RVSM Letter of Authorization

Appendix A - Definitions

1. General Provisions 1. Parties. These Terms & Conditions regulate the legal relationship between us, Skypicker.com s.r.o., ID No.

Submitted electronically via

Operating Limitations At John F. Kennedy International Airport. SUMMARY: This action amends the Order Limiting Operations at John F.

Applicant: EUROWINGS LUFTVERKEHRS AG (Eurowings) Date Filed: July 16, 2014

REGULATIONS (10) FOREIGN AIR OPERATORS

ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-178-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Foreign Civil Aviation Authority Certifying Statements. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

Flight Regularity Administrative Regulations

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (Drone) Policy

Safety Regulatory Oversight of Commercial Operations Conducted Offshore

NBAA Testimony. Before TSA s Large Aircraft Security Program Public Hearing. January 8, Atlanta, Georgia

Shuttle Membership Agreement

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

FAA Draft Order CHG Designee Policy. Comments on the Draft Order published online for public comment

FAA/Industry Parts Forum. Ric Peri Vice President of Government & Industry Affairs Aircraft Electronics Association

ABTA response to the Department for Transport and Civil Aviation Authority consultations on ATOL. March 2018

For questions about this policy, please contact the Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation at

SUPERSEDED. [Docket No NM-217-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

Meritas Capability Webinar. Avoiding Common Mistakes Companies Make When Operating Business Aircraft. Gregory P. Ripple Miller Johnson

Compliance and. Enforcement. Federal Aviation Administration. Presented to: By: Date: FAA-LACAC-IATA Seminar FAA July 25-27, 2016

JOFair Aircraft Buyer's Checklist. Step 1: Choose the Make/Model that is Right for You

Applications by foreign civil aircraft operators to conduct in excess of six planeload charter flights per year under 14 CFR Part 375

Exemption No UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC 20591

Removal of Category IIIa, IIIb, and IIIc Definitions; Confirmation of Effective Date and Response to Public Comments

Alternative Part 61 using Aviation Safety Standards Part 61 Promulgated pursuant to Sec 9(1)(c) of the Civil Aviation Act

Joint Application of CONTINENTAL, UNITED, and AVIANCA, filed 8/29/2011 for:

Memorandum of Understanding

Major Repairs & Major Alterations MAJOR REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS TO PROVIDE AVIATION TECHNICIANS A FRANK DISCUSSION ON MAJOR ALTERATIONS

California State University Long Beach Policy on Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Love Field Customer Facility Charge Ordinance

Revision of the Third Air Package

Extension of Effective Date for the Helicopter Air Ambulance, Commercial. Helicopter, and Part 91 Helicopter Operations Final Rule

Supplement No. 17 published with Gazette No. 22 dated 25 October, THE AIR NAVIGATION (OVERSEAS TERRITORIES) ORDER 2007, S.I No.

SECTION 2 - GENERAL REGULATIONS

Advisory Circular. Aircraft Certification Authority Based on Foreign Qualifications

Administration Policies & Procedures Section Commercial Ground Transportation Regulation

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

[Docket No. FAA ; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-056-AD; Amendment ; AD ]

ACTION: Notice of a new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee

Transcription:

NBAA MEMBERSHIP ITEM 5(d) D E D I C A T E D T O H E L P I N G B U S I N E S S A C H I E V E I T S H I G H E S T G O A L S. GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT Balancing Innovation with Regulations 1 Pilot Records Improvement Act Guide

Table of Contents Who Can Sell Air Transportation?... 2 Operations Permitted by Part 135 On-Demand Operators... 3 Scheduled Operators... 3 On-Demand Operators...3 Public Charter Operators... 4 Selling Part 135 Scheduled, On-Demand and Public Charter Flights on a Per Seat Basis... 4 Scheduled...4 On-Demand...4 Public Charter...5 What are the Regulatory Pitfalls?... 5 Intro: Purpose and Disclaimer With the proven and recognized benefits of chartering aircraft, brokers and operators have for years been searching for business models that will permit them to market charters on business aircraft to the public on a per-seat basis rather than chartering the whole aircraft (on a plane load single-entity basis). This effort has been spurred by the internet and technological advances such as smartphone apps that enhance marketers abilities to match passengers with available aircraft. Entrepreneurs who witness success in other industries are eager to apply crowdsourcing, sharing economy and other technological solutions to the on-demand charter industry. A primary consideration with such business models is concern over whether their implementation results in regulatory agencies considering flights to be impermissible scheduled operations, or, in the case of the Department of Transportation (DOT), to also consider that the seller is acting as an unauthorized indirect air carrier. Many such models have been attempted, with some having been informally approved by DOT; others disapproved informally, or via regulatory agency enforcement action; and yet others not having undergone regulatory scrutiny. This resource is intended to provide an overview of (a) the types of per-seat and planeload charter operations using aircraft operated under Part 135 scheduled, charter and on-demand operations, and (b) certain regulatory considerations that govern such operations. This analysis is not intended as a checklist of the legal and regulatory issues that may relate to specific types of programs; rather, it is intended to provide members with an introduction to the rules surrounding single seat charter sales. It is not intended to provide more than an illustrative introduction to the subject matter, and since the information is general in nature, it is no substitute for the advice of legal professionals addressing a specific set of facts that readers may face. Who Can Sell Air Transportation? Air transportation, whether scheduled or charter, may be sold by a licensed direct air carrier (operator), a licensed indirect air carrier (under DOT s Part 380) or the authorized agent of either. A Part 135 operator that is registered under Part 298 of the DOT s regulations and holds a Part 119 air carrier certificate with Part 135 on-demand operations specifications ( on-demand operator, also known as air taxi operator), may sell flights by the seat, in accordance with restrictions listed below, as scheduled operations, on-demand charters or public charters in conjunction with a public charter operator (PCO). In the case of scheduled and on-demand operations, extensive restrictions and limitations apply. An indirect air carrier is a person or entity, including a broker, which holds out air transportation to the public in its own right, contracting separately with a licensed operator to operate the flights sold to the public. An indirect air carrier can sell charter GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 2

flights on a per-seat basis only by acting as a PCO under Part 380 of DOT s regulations. Flights operated under Part 380 are not considered scheduled flights by the FAA, regardless of frequency or regularity of such operations. DOT has proposed a rule to permit air charter brokers to sell planeload charters to the public in their own right as indirect air carriers, provided they comply with certain consumer protection provisions that focus primarily on notice to customers and the customer s right to a refund if DOT requirements are not met. That proposal remains pending as of the date of publication of this guidance. (For further information, read NBAA s resource on the Air Charter Broker NPRM at https://www.nbaa.org/ops/ part135/brokers/20131127-nbaa-comments-on-dot-air-charter-broker-nprm.php) Operations Permitted by Part 135 On-Demand Operators Under FAA and DOT regulations, on-demand operators can conduct three types of operations: scheduled, on-demand charters and public charters. Each operational type is discussed in detail below. Scheduled Operations Under the definition of on-demand in the FAA regulations, 14 CFR 110.2 (Definitions), a Part 135 on-demand operator can operate up to four round-trips a week 1 in the same city-pair market utilizing nine-seat or fewer non-turbojet aircraft, or any size rotorcraft aircraft when the departure location, departure time and arrival location are held out to the public (i.e., scheduled operations). If an operator with such aircraft wants to operate five or more scheduled round-trip operations per week pursuant to a published schedule, they must first obtain commuter operations specifications. FAA does not permit any scheduled operations by turbojet aircraft, regardless of their particular seating capacity, without first obtaining Part 121 operations specifications. However, regardless of aircraft type or number of seats, the FAA does not consider any operation authorized by DOT to be conducted as a public charter under that agency s regulations, 14 CFR Part 380, to be scheduled. 2 Under Part 298 of DOT s economic regulations, an operator that wants to operate five or more scheduled round trip flights per week between the same two points, including where those flights are operated as public charter flights under Part 380, must be found fit as a commuter carrier by DOT. If the operator wants to operate fewer than five scheduled round-trip flights per week between the same two points, 3 they can do so as long as it is Part 135 on-demand operator and a DOT-registered air taxi operator. On-Demand Operation As a general matter, the FAA and DOT consider common carriage on-demand charter flights to be those in which the departure time, departure location and arrival location are specifically negotiated with the customer or the customer s representative. Historically, the agencies have not required all three items to be negotiated with the customer and, indeed, have still considered a flight to be on-demand if only one of the items is negotiated. Thus, operators have been permitted to hold out specific departure and arrival locations, so long as the departure time remains to be negotiated. This is often seen where so-called empty legs are held out between two points, with the departure time stated as a range, and the specific time subject to negotiation between the operator and customer. Operators are cautioned, however, that neither FAA nor DOT have specific rules stating how narrow a time window can be advertised and the flight still be considered on-demand. As a general rule, the narrower the window, the more likely the flight will draw scrutiny from those authorities. Provided that the general requirement noted above is met, under FAA rules, on-demand operations may be conducted with any type of aircraft of up to 30 seats and a payload capacity of up to 7,500 pounds. 4 Under 14 CFR 110.2, on-demand operation means any operation for compensation or hire that is one of the following: (i) Passenger-carrying operations conducted as a public charter under part 380 of this chapter or any operations in which the departure time, departure location and arrival location are specifically negotiated with the customer or the customer s representative that are any of the following types of operations: 1 Because commuter authority is required only if five or more round-trips are operated in a single market, a Part 135 on-demand operator can schedule four-round trips and a single one-way trip per week in each market. This is commonly called four and a half round trips per week. 2 See section on Public Charters on page 4 3 DOT s Part 298 permits such operations with aircraft that as originally designed have up to 60 seats or a maximum payload capacity of up to 18,000 pounds. 14 CFR 298.2. 4 See definition of on-demand operation in 14 CFR 110.2. GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 3

(ii) Common carriage operations conducted with airplanes, including turbojet-powered airplanes, having a passenger-seat configuration of 30 seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, except that operations using a specific airplane that is also used in domestic or flag operations and that is so listed in the operations specifications as required by 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those operations are considered supplemental operations; (iii) Non-common or private carriage operations conducted with airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of less than 20 seats, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of less than 6,000 pounds; or (iv) Any rotorcraft operation. Public Charter Operations The definition of on-demand operation in Section 110.2 of the Federal Aviation Regulations specifically allows for PCO utilizing Part 135-sized aircraft to be conducted as on-demand flights. To take advantage of the public charter rules, a Part 135 on-demand air carrier would enter an arrangement with a PCO. Once the proper documents have been filed with the DOT, and such filings had been accepted by the DOT, the PCO can begin selling seats on the flights for which authority was granted. For more information on public charter rules and regulations and the required filings, please contact your regulatory attorney or consultant. Additionally, operators should note that while FAA places no restriction on the number of public charters which can be conducted by a Part 135 operator, the DOT does not permit a Part 135 operator to conduct more than four and a half round-trip flights per week in any one city-pair market. To conduct more flights in any city pair, a Part 135 on-demand operator must obtain a Commuter Air Carrier Authorization from the DOT, which is typically a 9-12 month process at minimum. Selling Part 135 Scheduled, On-Demand and Public Charter Flights on a Per-Seat Basis As outlined above, there are three types of operations which can be held out to the public on a per-seat basis by Part 135 ondemand operators: (a) certain limited scheduled operations, (b) on-demand charter operations and (c) public charter operations. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in air charter brokers selling Part 135 on-demand capacity using business models such as crowdsourcing, membership programs and mobile app solicitations. While it is beyond the scope of this analysis to assess the legality of any particular business model, listed below are questions and issues of which operators should be aware in assessing the feasibility of a particular model. For ease of review, we have broken this into scheduled, on-demand, and public charter flights. Scheduled Is the carrier utilizing non-turbojet aircraft with fewer than 10 seats and maximum certificated take-off weight of less than 7,500 pounds, or helicopters? If the carrier has not been found fit as a commuter air carrier by the DOT, is such carrier performing less than five roundtrips per week in each city pair market? If the broker is planning on taking any risk of loss on unsold seats, e.g., through a membership program or otherwise, this will need to be explored further with regulatory counsel. On-Demand Is the broker acting as an agent of the customer in procuring on-demand charter transportation? If not, is the broker acting as agent of the Part 135 operator in selling such charters? Is the broker or carrier leaving open for negotiation one or more of the following: departure location, departure time or arrival location? If the broker or carrier is publishing all three items, this would be considered a scheduled flight and could not be held out to the public as an on-demand charter flight. Is the broker reselling air transportation (i.e., buying from the carrier for its own account and reselling such transportation to the customer)? If so, it is likely an unauthorized indirect air carrier operation. Is the broker crowdsourcing the flight by allowing passengers to self-aggregate and collectively determine the itinerary of the chosen flight? If so, have proper measures been taken to ensure that such crowdsourcing meets regulatory require- GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 4

ments. 5 Because there are numerous regulatory pitfalls if done incorrectly (see below), any crowdsourcing should be done in consultation with aviation counsel. Public Charter Has the PCO entered into a charter contract with a Part 135 carrier prior to filing for authority from the DOT and selling flights to the public? Has the PCO complied with the requirements of DOT Part 380 by preparing and filing the necessary forms with the DOT, having the necessary bond/financial instrument in place, properly escrowing passenger payments, entering into the necessary Tour Participant Agreements and adhering to all additional requirements of Part 380? 6 If the Part 135 carrier operating the public charters proposes to conduct more than four and a half round-trip flights per week in the same city-pair market, has it been found fit by DOT to operate as a commuter air carrier? What are the Regulatory Pitfalls? What can and cannot be considered lawful by FAA and DOT in this area is extremely fact-specific. Unfortunately, the risks of engaging in activity that the FAA and DOT consider unlawful can be harsh. Moreover, the standard within a given business model is not always patently clear and can be subject to prosecutorial discretion. Business models can be viewed by DOT and FAA as self-aggregation, crowdsourcing or facilitating the gathering of a group of people who then decide to charter aircraft on their own. FAA and DOT s goal is to ensure that transparency exists between what the public purchases and what it receives both in terms of safety and consumer protection, including that appropriate licensure requirements are met. It is not surprising that so many seek to sell individual seats in air transportation on a flight with a planned departure time but without the need to obtain additional scheduled authority from either DOT or FAA. The time, effort and costs associated with obtaining and maintaining these authorities are not insubstantial. Failing to obtain appropriate authority, however, can result in FAA and DOT individually pursuing enforcement action. Among these include cease and desist orders, together with potential civil penalties by DOT and FAA that can easily reach seven figures, as well as other measures against a company itself or individuals involved in the violations. In this regard, FAA s statutory authority permits it to assess $11,000 per regulatory violation per flight leg and DOT s statutory authority subjects a violator to $32,140 per violation which could be per-passenger and $32,140 per day that each violation continues. In short, dozens of regulatory violations can be multiplied by the number of legs sometimes dozens in a day or the number of passengers involved. One can then understand how the penalty dollars increase exponentially. Moreover, FAA and DOT can each issue their own civil penalties separately and simultaneously, making things even more difficult for the unwary operator. 7 In addition, DOT has the power to suspend or revoke the authority of an operator and to take action against individuals deemed responsible for the unlawful activities, including banning them from the industry. 8 FAA also has the power to take certificate action against the air carrier involved (usually an on-demand air carrier) to either suspend or revoke, and almost 5 Although DOT has provided no public guidance, the keys to this model appear to include the following: (a) the membership entity acts as web host providing a members-only web site through which a lead passenger notifies other members about a desired charter flight; (b) an agreement arises among members to share a charter flight prior to the operator being contacted about the flight; (c) once the members commit to the flight, the membership entity acts as the agent of the members in arranging the charter trip. Neither the membership entity nor the operator can play any other role in forming the charter group. 6 Note that a Part 135 on-demand operator may itself file a prospectus under DOT s Part 380 and become a PCO. In such an event, the operator would be subject to the same restrictions noted in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. 7 For example, some years ago, FAA and DOT both took action against all those involved in an unlawful operation, including the certificate holder, aircraft operator and crew, and broker. In addition to an order to cease and desist from further unlawful conduct, civil penalties assessed by DOT against the certificate holder, principals of the aircraft operator and broker amounted to $275,000. FAA enforcement action included emergency revocation of the flight crew s airman certificates and emergency revocation of the air carrier s Part 135 certificate. Federal fraud indictments were also issued resulting in criminal convictions and sentences of years in jail In another matter, a late 2016 FAA Notice of Proposed civil penalty was issued in the amount of $218,700 for a small number of flights where the FAR Part 135 on demand air carrier was alleged to have operated scheduled commuter flights beyond its on-demand authority. 8 For example, in addition to issuing cease and desist orders and assessing civil penalties, DOT has on various occasions banned individuals who engaged in unlawful conduct from the industry for periods of one to five years, and for life in the most egregious case. GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 5

universally to revoke the certificate. Pilots typically receive actions to suspend or revoke their airman certificates regardless of what they are told or whether they genuinely believe the operations to be lawful. Suspending a pilot s airman certificate often ends or substantially diminishes the pilot s career. Lastly, operating flights contrary to the relevant regulations can invalidate insurance coverage and create an event of default under loan documents. As outlined above, the pitfalls of failing to explore the specific facts of a given operation against the sometimes difficult-tounderstand regulatory standards can have disastrous impacts upon companies and individual alike. It is, therefore, recommended to always seek appropriate advice before undertaking operations you have questions about. The risk of not doing so can be surprisingly and debilitatingly harsh. Conclusion Based upon the above, it is clear that Part 135 on-demand and by-the-seat sales are not mutually exclusive categories. When selling or brokering per-seat transportation, sales brokers and carriers must navigate their way through DOT and FAA regulations that are not always clear or consistent. Until such time as the DOT and FAA provide more detailed guidance in this area, heightened caution is essential. If in doubt, the best course of action is to seek advice from aviation counsel and, if questions persist, seek a determination from FAA and/or DOT regulators before commencing operations. GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 6

National Business Aviation Association 1200 G Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 www.nbaa.org (202) 783-9250 ops@nbaa.org ACKNOWLEDGMENTS NBAA thanks the volunteers of NBAA s Regulatory Issues Advisory Group who developed and reviewed this association publication. The principal authors are Dayton Lehman Jr. of Capitol Business Solutions, Inc., Aviation Group, and Paul Lange of the Law Offices of Paul A. Lange, LLC, with significant contributions also made by Victor Smith of Garofalo, Goerlich & Hainbach, PC and Eileen M. Gleimer of Crowell & Moring LLP. For additional guidance on business aircraft operating and ownership options, visit the NBAA website at www.nbaa.org/admin/options. ABOUT NBAA Founded in 1947 and based in Washington, DC, the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) is the leading organization for companies that rely on general aviation aircraft to help make their businesses more efficient, productive and successful. Contact NBAA at 800-FYI-NBAA or info@nbaa.org. Not a member? Join today by visiting www.nbaa.org/join. GUIDE TO SELLING CHARTER BY THE SEAT 7