BACKGROUND DATA: CHICO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS

Similar documents
BACKGROUND DATA: RANCHAERO AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS

BACKGROUND DATA: PARADISE SKYPARK AND ENVIRONS

Chapter 5. Background Data: Gustine Municipal Airport and Environs. Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

Chapter 8. Background Data: Turlock Municipal Airport and Environs. Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

Background Data: Blue Canyon Airport and Environs

Background Data: Blue Canyon Airport and Environs

Background Data: Lincoln Regional Airport and Environs

Background Data: Lincoln Regional Airport and Environs

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

APPENDIX K LAND USE. Charles M. Schulz - Sonoma County Airport Draft Environmental Impact Report July 2011 K-1

Comparison Between Old and New ALUC Plans

Chapter Six ALP Drawings. Tacoma Narrows Airport. Master Plan Update

AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATILIBILTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILIITY

Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Update. Public Information Meeting #4 June 8 & 9, 2016

Airport Background Data and Assumptions Report New Cuyama Airport. Santa Barbara County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update

CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED ACTION

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY OF KEY ISSUES OVERVIEW

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Santa Barbara Airport Master Plan. MEETING DATE: November 19, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 7D

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

DRAFT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Reliever Airports: NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN Flying Cloud Airport (FCM)

New Opportunities PUBLIC WORKSHOP. Venice Municipal. Bringing g the pieces together

Chapter 9 - AIRPORT SYSTEM DESIGN

The following criteria shall be applied within the boundaries of the AO District:

Appendix C AIRPORT LAYOUT PLANS

6.4 Aviation AVIATION FACILITIES AND SERVICES

Notice of Extended Comment Period for an Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

6.C.1 AIRPORT NOISE. Noise Analysis and Land Use Impact Assessment FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

1.1.3 Taxiways. Figure 1-15: Taxiway Data. DRAFT Inventory TYPICAL PAVEMENT CROSS-SECTION LIGHTING TYPE LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) LIGHTING CONDITION

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

at: Accessed May 4, 2011.

Chapter 4 Airport Facility Requirements

Milton. PeterPrinceAirportislocatedinSantaRosaCounty, approximatelythreemileseastofmilton.

Grants Pass Airport Master Plan & Airport Layout Plan Update

Chippewa-Eau Claire Metropolitan Planning Area Long Range Transportation Plan

Memorandum. Federal Aviation Administration. Date: June 19, Richard Doucette, Environmental Protection Specialist. From: To:

ORDINANCE NO. _2013-

6.4 Aviation AVIATION FACILITIES AND SERVICES

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

Airport Planning Area

Windmills & Airspace Can We Work Together?

TECHNICAL REPORT #7 Palm Beach International Airport Airport Layout Plan

Flying Cloud Airport (FCM) Zoning Process: Informing a Mn/DOT Path Forward

Yolo County Airport. ALP Narrative Report. April Prepared by Mead & Hunt, Inc. for the County of Yolo, California

Airlake Airport 2035 Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP)

Addendum - Airport Development Alternatives (Chapter 6)

During all other times operators are required to use the designated run-up locations for run-ups above idle power.

Kittitas County Airport Bowers Field Airport Master Plan Planning Advisory Committee Meeting #1 April 6, 2016

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

Livermore Municipal Airport and Vicinity Data

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

Attachment B Ordinance Campus Master Plan Marshfield Municipal Airport

BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WA

Butte County. Airport land use. compatibility plan OROVILLE MUNICIPAL, CHICO MUNICIPAL, RANCHAERO AIRPORTS PARADISE AND

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Tallahassee International Airport Master Plan. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #2 October 19, 2016

COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SANTA CLARA COUNTY PALO ALTO AIRPORT

Master Plan & Noise Compatibility Study Update

Document prepared by MnDOT Office of Aeronautics and HNTB Corporation. MINNESOTA GO STATE AVIATION SYSTEM PLAN

Table of Contents. List of Tables. Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport 2035 Master Plan Update

Agenda: SASP SAC Meeting 3

Summary of Committee Discussion/Questions Metropolitan Transportation Services Senior Planner Russ Owen presented this item.

Lopez Island Airport Master Plan Update. Public Meeting June 15, 2017

Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) Aircraft Noise Contour Map Update

CHAPTER 3 AIRPORT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

OVERVIEW BASIC DESIGN FACTORS. Demand Determinants

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

The purpose of this Demand/Capacity. The airfield configuration for SPG. Methods for determining airport AIRPORT DEMAND CAPACITY. Runway Configuration

ERIE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

Overview ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices for Aerodrome Safeguarding

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

Consideration will be given to other methods of compliance which may be presented to the Authority.

AIRPORTS POLICY 28, AIRPORTS:

6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 AIRSIDE ALTERNATIVES NORTH PERRY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE RUNWAY LENGTH REQUIREMENTS SECTION 6: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Boise Municipal Code. Chapter DEFINITIONS

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN FOR FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL REPLACEMENT AIRPORT - SITE 12 FRIEDMAN MEMORIAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET TITLE

BELFAST MUNICIPAL AIRPORT OVERVIEW

Dallas Executive Airport Town Hall Meeting April 3, 2014

chapter 5 Recommended Master Plan Concept airport master plan MASTER PLAN CONCEPT

APPENDIX H NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM ALTERNATIVES

Hearings will be held in the Shirley Huffman Auditorium in the Charles D. Cameron Public Services Building, 155 North First Avenue, Hillsboro, Oregon.

1 DRAFT. General Aviation Terminal Services Aircraft Hangars Aircraft Parking Aprons Airport Support Facilities

Safety, Infrastructure, and Tenant Improvement Project. Public Hearing Informational Brochure February 26, 2013

1. Background and Proposed Action

Table of Contents. Overview Objectives Key Issues Process...1-3

Chapter 4 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES

Hartford-Brainard Airport Potential Runway Closure White Paper

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

CHAPTER 3 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

MASTER PLAN CONCEPT 1 DRAFT

SECTION 5 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT ANALYSES

DEPARTMENT: CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE2303/ Railway, Airport and Harbors Engineering 2 MARK QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Transcription:

hapter 5 BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS irport Land Use ompatibility Plan

5 Background ata: hico Municipal irport and Environs INTROUTION hico Municipal irport is the largest and busiest airport in Butte ounty. The airport is owned and operated by the ity of hico and occupies some 2.3 square miles (1,475 acres) on the northern edge of the ity of hico. The airport currently handles over 50,000 aircraft takeoffs and landings annually and is home to more than 100 based aircraft. hico Municipal includes two parallel runways. Runway 13L- 31R is the airport s 6,724-foot long primary runway which is equipped with a precision instrument landing system and is capable of accommodating a full range of business jet aircraft. Runway 13R-31L is the visual general aviation runway which is 2,560 feet long. The airport has an airport traffic control tower and serves as a primary regional base for fire-suppression aircraft. From 1947 through late 2014, hico Municipal irport provided limited scheduled commuter airline service on an intermittent basis. lthough the airport has no scheduled passenger air service today, the ity of hico and local groups understand the value of commercial air service to the region and are taking steps to reestablish airline service at the airport. Land use compatibility has long been a concern at hico Municipal irport. When originally developed by the military during World War II, the facility was situated several miles from the edge of the city. Over the years, though, urban expansion has gradually crept closer. Two actions taken in the late 1970s have provided some protection from incompatible nearby development. Perhaps most significant was the city s acquisition of all property within a ½-by-1-mile area beyond each end of the main runway. Secondly, the city and county jointly sponsored preparation of a hico Municipal irport Environs Plan. This plan was used to set modest limitations on development primarily residential development on the basis of noise impacts. Safety was deemed as not being a concern beyond the 1-mile acquisition area boundary. Prior to preparation of the 2000 ompatibility Plan, the Environs Plan also served as the basis for the Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission compatibility policies for the airport. The following exhibits illustrate the compatibility factors and background information which serve as the basis for this irport Land Use ompatibility Plan for hico Municipal irport. Exhibit 5-1: irport Features Summary. Presents information pertaining to the airport configuration, operational characteristics and applicable planning documents. Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) 5 1

HPTER 5 BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS Exhibit 5-2: irport Layout Plan. The irport Layout Plan depicts the existing and future airfield configuration and airport building areas. The irport Layout Plan (2009) reflects a proposal to extend both runways: a 1,876-foot northward addition to the primary runway for an ultimate length of 8,600 feet and a doubling of the parallel runway to 6,000 feet in length (1,500 foot extension to north and south). Exhibit 5-3: irport ctivity ata Summary. This table summarizes the data used in the noise contour calculations conducted for the irport Master Plan (2003). The Master Plan s 2020 forecast reflects some 86,458 annual operations. The 2000 ompatibility Plan for hico Municipal irport used an expanded forecast of 141,700 annual operations to protect the long-term viability of the region s busiest airport. The forecast of 141,700 annual operations is brought forward as the basis of this ompatibility Plan s noise policies. Exhibits 5-4 through 5-7: ompatibility Factors. epicts the extents of the four compatibility factors upon which the ompatibility Zones for hico Municipal irport were derived. The four compatibility factors are defined by: Noise Future noise contours reflecting an ultimate aircraft activity forecast level of 141,700 annual operations. Safety Generic safety zones provided in the alifornia irport Land Use Planning Handbook (October 2011) are applied to the existing and future runway configurations in the following manner: Runway 13L-31R: Safety zones for a long general aviation runway (length 6,000 feet or more) are applied to the existing and future runway configuration. Runway 13R-31L: Safety zones for a medium general aviation runway (Length 4,000 to 5,999 feet) are applied to the existing and future runway configuration. Overflight Primary traffic patterns reflecting where aircraft operating at the airport routinely fly. irspace Protection The F notification and obstruction surfaces as defined by Federal viation Regulation (FR) Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable irspace. Exhibit 5-8: irport Environs Information. Summarizes information about current and planned land uses in the environs of the hico Municipal irport. The status of local general plans and airport land use compatibility policies contained in those plans are also summarized. Exhibit 5-9: ounty of Butte General Plan Land Uses. Shows the planned land use designations as reflected in the Butte ounty General Plan 2030 Land Use Element (amended November 2012). Exhibit 5-10: ity of hico General Plan Land Uses. Shows planned land use designations as reflected in the adopted hico 2030 General Plan Land Use iagram (amended January 2013). 5 2 Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017)

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 GENERL INFORMTION irport Ownership: ity of hico Property Size: 1,475 acres irport lassification: ommercial service, non-hub irport Elevation: 240.2 ft. MSL RUNWY/TXIWY ESIGN Runway 13L-31R ritical ircraft: Boeing 717 irport ategory/esign Group: -III imensions: 6,724 ft. long, 150 ft. wide Pavement Strength (main landing gear configuration) 63,000 lbs (single wheel) 100,000 lbs (dual wheel) 170,000 lbs (dual tandem wheel) verage Gradient: 0.5% (rising to northwest) Runway Lighting: HIRL, REIL, MLSR Primary Taxiways: Full-length parallel on northeast Runway 13R-31L ritical ircraft: Twin-Engine irport ategory/esign Group: B-I imensions: 3,000 ft. long, 60 ft. wide Pavement Strength (main landing gear configuration) 12,500 lbs (single wheel) verage Gradient: 0.4% (rising to northwest) Runway Lighting: None Primary Taxiways: Exit taxiways on northeast Helipad H1 imensions: 50 ft. by 50 ft. (concrete) Pavement Strength (main landing gear configuration) 35,000 lbs (single wheel) Location: East of airfield on aircraft parking apron PPROH PROTETION Runway Protection Zones (RPZs) Runway 13L & 31R: 2,500-ft. long; all on airport Runway 13R & 31L: 1,000-ft. long; all on airport pproach Obstacles Runways 13L & 31R: None Runway 13R & 31L: None IRPORT PLNNING OUMENTS irport Master Plan dopted ugust 2003 irport Layout Plan rawing Prepared in 2002; last revised in 2009 FR Part 150 Noise ompatibility Program pproved by F September 1996 TRFFI PTTERNS N PPROH PROEURES irplane Traffic Patterns Runways 13R & 13L: Right traffic Runways 31R & 31L: Left traffic Helipad: Left traffic Pattern altitude: 1,000 ft. GL light aircraft; 1,500 ft. GL for jets and heavy aircraft east of airport Instrument pproach Procedures (lowest minimums) Runway 13L ILS or LO/ME (precision) Straight-in (ILS): ½ mile visibility, 200 ft. descent ht. Straight-in (LO): ½ mile vis., 340 ft. descent ht. ircling: 1 mile visibility, 400 ft. descent ht. Missed approach continues straight Runway 13L RNV (GPS) Straight-in: 1 mile visibility, 296 ft. descent ht. ircling: 1 mile visibility, 400 ft. descent ht. Missed approach continues straight Runway 31R RNV (GPS) Straight-in: 1 mile visibility, 250 ft. descent ht. ircling: 1 mile visibility, 400 ft. descent ht. Missed approach continues straight Runway 31R VOR/ME Straight-in: 16 westerly offset, 1 mile visibility, 536 ft. descent ht. ircling: 1 mile visibility, 522 ft. descent ht. Missed approach turns west Visual pproach ids irport: Rotating beacon Runway 13L: MLSR, REIL, PPI (3.0 ) Runway 31R: REIL, VSI (3.0 ) FR Part 150 Voluntary Noise batement Procedures pproaching aircraft should maintain as high as possible altitude until final decent epartures from Runway 13L, turbojet and large propeller aircraft, requested to turn 80 heading until reaching 3,000 feet MSL to avoid direct overflight of central hico, safety permitting epartures from Runway 31R to climb straight out until reaching 3,000 feet MSL before turning Exhibit 5-1 irport Features Summary hico Municipal irport Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) 5 3

HPTER 5 BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS BUILING RE Location: East side of airfield ircraft Parking apacity 107 hangar spaces 200 tiedowns Other Major Facilities Terminal/dministration Building ir traffic control tower Fire attack base ir tanker retrofitting Services Fuel: Jet-, 100LL irframe and powerplant, avionics, aircraft sales and more PLNNE FILITY IMPROVEMENTS irfield Extend Runway 13L-31R 1,876 ft. north for a total length of 8,600 ft. Extend Runway 13R-31L 1,500 ft. north and 1,500 ft. south for a total length of 6,000 feet and widen to 100 ft. Helipad H1 to be decommissioned but remain as a parking spot Building rea Northeast rea: Minor improvements and expansion to existing facilities Southeast rea: Reserved for new airport compatible commercial and industrial development West: ll area due to be built out with aviation and nonaviation commercial uses Property No acquisitions proposed Notes Sources: F irport Master Record (June 2016), hico Municipal irport Layout Plan (2003), irnav (November 2016). Exhibit 5-1, ontinued 5 4 Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017)

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 Notes: 1. Source: hico Municipal irport, irport Layout Plan. \\corp.meadhunt.com\sharedfolders\entp\0229700\160329.01\teh\\i-poliy-mps.dwg ec 08, 2017-9:42am Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) Exhibit 5-2 irport Layout Plan hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 BSE IRRFT urrent a Future b 2016 Expanded Forecast ircraft Type Single-Engine 93 104 Multi-Engine 21 36 Jets 0 0 Total 114 140 IRRFT OPERTIONS urrent a Future b 2016 Expanded Forecast Total nnual 34,000 141,700 verage ay, nnual 93 388 istribution by Operation Type a ir arrier <0.5% -- ir Taxi 20% -- General viation, Local 18% -- General viation, Itinerant 57% -- Military 4.5% -- istribution by ircraft Type c General viation Single-Engine Piston -- 35% Twin-Engine Piston -- 19% Turboprop -- 10% Business Jet -- 4% irline Turboprop -- 6% Turbojet -- 4% ir argo Single, Twin, Turboprop -- 17% Military (all types) -- 4% Fire ttach (all types) -- 1% FLIGHT TRK USGE c ll ircraft, Except Fire ttack ircraft Widely distributed departure tracks; percentages vary by aircraft type Varied arrival tracks, but predominantly straight-in except for touch-and-goes; percentages vary by aircraft type RUNWY USE ISTRIBUTION c urrent Future Takeoffs General viation (all aircraft) Runway 13L 60% 45% Runway 31R 40% 30% Runway 13R 0% 15% Runway 31L 0% 10% irline, ir argo, & Fire ttack Runway 13L 60% 60% Runway 31R 40% 40% Landings Gen l viation, Single-Engine Runway 13L 54% 45% Runway 31R 37% 30% Runway 13R 6% 15% Runway 31L 3% 10% Gen l viation, Twin-Engine & Turboprop Runway 13L 59% 45% Runway 31R 39% 30% Runway 13R 1% 15% Runway 31L 1% 10% Gen l viation, Business Jets Runway 13L 60% 45% Runway 31R 40% 30% Runway 13R 0% 15% Runway 31L 0% 10% irline, ir argo, & Fire ttack Runway 13L 60% 60% Runway 31R 40% 40% Touch-and-Goes Gen l viation, Single-Engine Runway 13L 3% Runway 31R 2% no Runway 13R 57% change Runway 31L 38% Gen l viation, Twin-Engine & Turboprop Runway 13L 58% Runway 31R 38% no Runway 13R 2% change Runway 31L 2% Fire ttack ircraft epartures, Runway 13L (to south): Straight out 50% Traffic pattern departure 30% 50 left turn 20% epartures, Runway 31R (to north): Straight out 70% Traffic pattern departure 15% To east 15% rrivals, Runway 13L (from north): Straight in 75% From east 25% rrivals, Runway 31R (from south): Straight in 65% From east 25% From southeast 10% Exhibit 5-3 irport ctivity ata Summary hico Municipal irport Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) 5 5

HPTER 5 BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS TIME OF Y ISTRIBUTION c ay Evening Night Takeoffs General viation Single-Engine, Piston 87% 10% 3% Twin-Engine, Piston 72% 19% 9% Turboprop 74% 10% 16% Business Turbojet 76% 10% 14% irline ll Types 81% 10% 14% ir argo ll Types 73% 14% 13% Military ll Types 76% 10% 14% Fire ttack ll Types 49% 36% 15% Landings General viation Single-Engine, Piston 87% 10% 3% Twin-Engine, Piston 72% 19% 9% Turboprop 78% 9% 13% Business Turbojet 82% 11% 7% irline ll Types 81% 10% 14% ir argo ll Types 75% 14% 11% Military ll Types 50% 37% 13% Fire ttack ll Types 50% 37% 13% Touch-and-Goes General viation Single-Engine, Piston 90% 10% 0% Twin-Engine, Piston 90% 10% 0% Turboprop 90% 10% 0% Business Turbojet 100% 0% 0% Military ll Types 50% 37% 13% Notes a Source: F irport Master Record (November 2016). b Source: Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (2000); for compatibility planning purposes, forecast assumes 1.5 times the draft hico irport Master Plan 2018 forecast of 94,740 annual operations will be reached at an undefined future date. See policy 2.2.2 for additional language, if appropriate. c Source: Brown-Buntin ssociates, hico Municipal irport Noise nalysis (June 1999); prepared as part of irport Master Plan study (2003) Exhibit 5-3, ontinued 5 6 Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017)

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 Legend :\Users\1936djl\appdata\local\temp\cPublish_15340\I-OMPTIBILITY FTORS-MPS.dwg ec 08, 2017-9:32am State Hwy. 99 Meridian Rd. Nord Hwy. UNINORPORTE Garner Ln. Esplanade Hicks Ln. 13L 13R Keefer Rd. Eaton Rd. 31L 31R HIO ohasset Rd. Richardson Springs Rd. Lindo 230 kv Transmission Line hannel Big hico reek 500 kv Transmission Line UNINORPORTE 4,000' 0 FEET 8,000' Boundary Lines Existing Runway Runway 13L-31R (6,724' X 150') Runway 13R-31L (3,000' X 60') Future Runway Extension Runway 13L-31R (8,600' Ult. Total Length) Runway 13R-31L (6,000' Ult. Total Length) irport Property Line ity Limits ity Sphere of Influence ompatibility Zones irport Influence rea Noise Impacts - Expanded Forecast 55 db NEL 60 db NEL 141,700 Future nnual Operations 65 db NEL Notes: 1. Noise ontour Source: Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (2000); for compatibility planning purposes, forecast assumes 1.5 times the draft hico irport Master Plan 2018 forecast of 94,740 annual operations will be reached over a 20-year timeframe. Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) Exhibit 5-4 ompatibility Factors Map: Noise 1 hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 Legend :\Users\1936djl\appdata\local\temp\cPublish_16568\I-OMPTIBILITY FTORS-MPS.dwg ec 08, 2017-2:33pm State Hwy. 99 Meridian Rd. Nord Hwy. Garner Ln. UNINORPORTE 4 Esplanade 4 Hicks Ln. Keefer Rd. 2 3 4 3 2 3 1 3 3 1 3 2 4 1 2 3 22 6 1 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 13L 13R 1 2 3 2 2 3 1 6 4 3 6 Eaton Rd. 31L 3 1 31R 2 3 HIO 3 2 4 ohasset Rd. Richardson 6 4 Springs Rd. Lindo 230 kv Transmission Line hannel Big hico reek 500 kv Transmission Line UNINORPORTE 4,000' 0 FEET 8,000' Boundary Lines Existing Runway Runway 13L-31R (6,724' X 150') Runway 13R-31L (3,000' X 60') Future Runway Extension Runway 13L-31R (8,600' Ult. Total Length) Runway 13R-31L (6,000' Ult. Total Length) irport Property Line ity Limits ity Sphere of Influence ompatibility Zones irport Influence rea Runway Factors 1 Existing Runway Protection Zone Future Runway Protection Zone 2 Generic Safety Zones Short General viation Runway (up to 3,999') pplied to Runway 13R-31L Long General viation Runway (6,000'+) pplied to Runway 13L-31R Medium Length General viation Runway (4,000'-5,999') pplied to Runway 13R-31L Zone 1 Runway Protection Zone Zone 2 Inner pproach/eparture Zone Zone 3 Inner Turning Zone Zone 4 Outer pproach/eparture Zone Zone 5 Sideline Zone Zone 6 Traffic Pattern Zone Notes: 1. Runway Protection Zone Source: hico Municipal irport Layout Plan (pril 2002). 2. Safety Zones Source: alifornia irport Land Use Planning Handbook (2011). Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) Exhibit 5-5 ompatibility Factors Map: Safety hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS ircraft at 1,000'± above airport elevation on ILS approach Legend ircraft at 600'± above airport elevation on ILS approach Boundary Lines Existing Runway Future Runway Extension irport Property Line ity Limits ity Sphere of Influence ompatibility Zones irport Influence rea ircraft at 400'± above airport elevation on VOR-ME approach d. sr ar ch Ri d. at St Ke 99 Source: Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan, adopted ecember 2000 and airport management. VOR 0k V an Tr ion iss sm Hicks Ln. Garner Ln. Meridian Rd. 1. e Lin pl Es Eaton Rd. ohasset Rd. e ad an :\Users\1936djl\appdata\local\temp\cPublish_15340\I-OMPTIBILITY FTORS-MPS.dwg Notes UNINORPORTE Nord Hwy. Fire attack aircraft departure tracks 23 ec 08, 2017-8:52am General Traffic Pattern Envelope/Primary Flight irection (approximately 80% of powered aircraft overflights estimated to occur within these limits) ine. wy eh UNINORPORTE 1 Overflight Factors L sion mis rans kv T on ds rr efe ing Spr 500 HPTER 5 ircraft at 400'± above airport elevation on VOR-ME approach HIO 16 o Lind ircraft at 600'± above airport elevation on GPS approach Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan el hann ircraft at 1,000'± ico above airport elevation h on VOR-ME approach Big (dopted November 15, 2017) Exhibit 5-6 ek e r 4,000' 0 FEET 8,000' ompatibility Factors Map: Overflight hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 Legend Boundary Lines 7:1 Existing Runway Future Runway Extension irport Property Line ity Limits ity Sphere of Influence ompatibility Zones irport Influence rea d. sr 2 :1 50 at St 99 8 Meridian Rd. Notes 1. Source: Federal viation Regulation (FR) Part 77, Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of Navigable irspace (ugust 4, 2017). ion iss sm an Tr Hicks Ln. V e pl Es Lin 8 Eaton Rd. HIO :1 8 58 34 ohasset Rd. e ad an Nord Hwy. 0k 0 24 0:1 23 7:1 7:1 38 2 E E RF H 8 SU LIS N 38NTLESTVBTIO O E LE RIZ OV T E HO ' B OR 0 P 15 IR Garner Ln. 8 38 ec 08, 2017-8:35am Terrain Penetration of FR Part 77 Surfaces UNINORPORTE 38 FR Part 77 Surfaces ine. wy eh UNINORPORTE 1 irspace Factors L sion mis rans kv T d. 8 ar ch Ri rr efe Ke on ds 58 :\Users\1936djl\appdata\local\temp\cPublish_15340\I-OMPTIBILITY FTORS-MPS.dwg ing Spr 0:1 500 o Lind Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan el hann (dopted November 15, 2017) Exhibit 5-7 ek o g Bi ic h e r 4,000' 0 FEET 8,000' ompatibility Factors Map: irspace hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 IRPORT LOTION Location Northwestern Butte ounty 5 miles north of central hico Topography Situated at 240.238-foot elevation on western edge of Sacramento Valley Generally flat terrain in immediate vicinity, gently rising toward east; Sierra foothills begin 5 miles east EXISTING IRPORT RE LN USES General haracter irport situated on northern edge of expanding hico urban area Increasing residential development north and west Industrial on east edge of airport; open land beyond Runway pproaches North (Runway 13L): Rural residential 1.0 to 1.5 mile north of runway; agricultural land beyond South (Runway 31R): hico urban area ¾ mile south Traffic Pattern West (Runway 13R-31L): Mostly undeveloped within 1.0 mile of runway; rural/suburban residential, commercial and agricultural on edges East (Runway 13L-31R): Undeveloped grazing lands IRPORT ENVIRONS LN USE JURISITIONS ounty of Butte reas to north, east and west of airport in county jurisdiction ity of hico irport lies within northern extension of city limits Sphere of influence mostly follows city limits near airport, but entire environs with city s planning area STTUS OF OMMUNITY PLNS ounty of Butte General Plan 2030 adopted October 2010, amended November 2012 North hico Specific Plan (1995) Butte ounty Zoning Ordinance (November 2012) ity of hico 2030 General Plan dopted pril 2011 General Plan iagram (January 2013) Zoning map (September 2015) Northwest hico Specific Plan (2004) PLNNE IRPORT RE LN USES ounty of Butte Industrial uses planned adjacent to east and west sides of airport Extensive agricultural residential development (1-40 acre parcels) inside 2.0 miles east [General Plan] Expansive suburban residential uses (1-acre min. parcels planned inside 2.0 miles west; higher density core area 1.0 mile west [North hico Specific Plan] ity of hico West area consists of manufacturing, manufacturing with airport overlay constraint, open space, and a mix of uses in the North hico special planning area Industrial and commercial uses along east edge of airport some very low density residential in the south east. Urban office and commercial mixed use with medium to high density residential on remaining undeveloped land beyond south airport boundary Exhibit 5-8 irport Environs Information hico Municipal irport Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017) 5 7

HPTER 5 BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS ESTBLISHE OMPTIBILITY MESURES ounty of Butte General Plan 2030 Protect county airports in coordination with the 2000 irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (LUP). (Guiding Principles) irport Overlay pertains to areas located within irport Land Use ompatibility Zones described in Section.3. General Plan 2030 designations located within these zones are subject to additional land use restrictions under the 2000 LUP. (LU, Overlays) onsider 2000 LUP in General Plan and Zoning decisions and be consistent with it. (LU-P12.5) Recommend Butte ounty and irport Land Use ommission update the Butte ounty LUP. (LU-12.3) Private airstrips and landing fields shall be located outside of flight paths to and from existing airports so that they do not present a hazard or annoyance to neighboring areas. (IR-P11.1) New noise-sensitive land uses shall not be located within the 55 Ldn contour of airports, except hico Municipal irport. (HS-P1.3) New noise-sensitive land uses shall not be located within the 60 Ldn contour of hico Municipal irport. (HS-P1.4) Refer all developments which may impact upon any agricultural aviation operation to Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission (LU) for review. (2N- P1.13) Through Butte ounty LU, develop comprehensive land use recommendations to reduce potential conflicts between desired land uses and agricultural aviation activity. (2N-P1.15) Butte ounty North hico Specific Plan (1995) Protect long-term operations of hico Municipal irport by providing compatible land uses, adequate setbacks, avigation easements, signing and other measures. (LU10) vigation easements shall be required for all lands within the Plan area. (S7.6-1) Noise attenuation features shall be incorporated into new construction. (S7.6-2) Enhanced disclosure measures shall be developed and implemented to alert prospective home buyers and rental tenants as to the proximity of hico Municipal irport, existence of avigation easements, the existing and projected future overflight and noise levels, and such related issues as are appropriate to fully inform such prospective home buyer or rental tenant. (S7.6-3) Overflight Zone road signage shall be installed at key access points into the Plan area. (S7.6-4) Locate noise-sensitive uses away from airports. (G.2.b) Ensure land uses in vicinity of public airports are compatible with respective airport land use plans. (12.1.2) Plan for airport development and discourage noisesensitive activities near airports. (N4) Butte ounty Zoning ode irport (IR) zone preserves and protects Butte ounty s airports by allowing land uses and activities that are typically associated with airport operations, and preventing the encroachment of incompatible land uses. Max FR is 0.5. (Section 24-28B) irport ompatibility () overlay zone identifies land within unincorporated Butte ounty where additional requirements apply to ensure the compatibility of land uses and development with nearby airport operations. The overlay zone coincides with the irport Influence rea designated in the Butte ounty LUP. ll development projects and land use actions proposed within the overlay zone shall comply with the LUP criteria, excluding those criteria specifically overruled by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with Public Resources ode Section 21676. (Section 24-33) ity of hico 2030 General Plan North hico SP to address hico Municipal irport overflight zone compatibility. (LU-6.2.5) Protect hico Municipal and Ranchaero irports, and promote development in the irport Industrial Park. (LU-7) Safeguard hico Municipal and Ranchaero irports from intrusion by uses that could limit expansion of airport services, and prohibit development that poses hazards to aviation. (LU-7.1) Promote airport-related and other compatible development in the irport Industrial Park. (LU-7.2) Plan for and promote a full range of aviation services and facilities that meet the present and future needs of residents and the business community. (IR-6) Support the continued operation and expansion of hico Municipal irport as critical to the ity s economic vitality. (E-1.7) Support safe airport operations and maximize public safety in the vicinity of airports. (S-6) Promote safe air operations by limiting the height of structures and regulating uses that would have adverse impacts on airport safety. (S-6.1) ontinue to consider relevant public safety factors prior to approving development projects in the vicinity of airports. (S-6.2) ity of hico Zoning ode ode establishes four airport-related zoning districts: viation, irport-ommercial, irport-manufacturing/industrial and irport-public Facilities. (hapter 19.48) irport Environs (E) overlay district regulates land uses that may affect navigable airspace consistent with FR Part 77. (Section 19.52.020) irport Operations (O) overlay zone regulates land uses in the vicinity of airports consistent with the Butte ounty LUP. (19.52.030) Exhibit 5-8, continued 5 8 Butte ounty irport Land Use ompatibility Plan (dopted November 15, 2017)

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS HPTER 5 Legend Boundaries irport Influence rea ompatibility Zone Future Runway Extension irport Property North hico Specific Plan hico ity Limits hico Sphere of Influence Land Use esignations UNINORPORTE 13R 13L UNINORPORTE gricultural Resource onservation Residential, FR (1-40 ac/du) Rural Residential (5-10 ac/du) Residential, VLR (up to 1 du/ac) Residential, MR (up to 6 du/ac) 31L 31R Residential, MHR (up to 14 du/ac) Residential, HR (14-20 du/ac) Retail & Office Recreation ommercial Industrial Public 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Source: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2017 HIO Land Use Source: Butte ounty General Plan 2030, Land Use Element (November 6, 2012). Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan Exhibit 5-9 General Plan Land Use ounty of Butte hico Municipal irport

BKGROUN T: HIO MUNIIPL IRPORT N ENVIRONS Legend Boundaries HPTER 5 irport Influence rea ompatibility Zone Future Runway Extension irport Property Special Planning reas hico ity Limits Land Use esignations Residential hico Sphere of Influence Boundary UNINORPORTE 13R 13L UNINORPORTE VLR Very Low ensity Residential LR Low ensity Residential MR Medium ensity Residential MHR Medium-High ensity Residential RMU Residential Mixed Use ommercial N Neighborhood ommercial MU ommercial Mixed Use S ommercial Services R Regional ommercial Office and Industrial OMU Office Mixed Use North hico 31L 31R IOMU Industrial/Office Mixed Use MW Manufacturing & Warehousing Public and Open Space PFS Public Facilities & Services POS Primary Open Space SOS Secondary Open Space Special reas SP Special Planning rea Resource onstraint Overlay VLR/RO LR/RO MR/RO MHR/RO MU/RO OMU/RO MW/RO 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Source: Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2017 Bell / Muir HIO Land Use Source: Ity of hico General Plan iagram ( January 1, 2013). Butte ounty irport Land Use ommission hico Municipal irport Land Use ompatibility Plan Exhibit 5-10 General Plan Land Use ity of hico hico Municipal irport