PRIORITY HABITAT SURVEY 2017 SWALEDALE. Summary. July 2018

Similar documents
Designated Sites. Headlines

APPENDIX 3: DESIGNATED SITES IN THE ITDMG AREA

Lowland Heathland in Nottinghamshire: Progress towards the LBAP

Appendices A (Our ambition for nature (A3 plan) and further information)

1. INTRODUCTION 2. CURRENT STATUS

LOWLAND HEATHLAND 1. CURRENT STATUS. Action Plan Scope: 1.1 Legislation and priority status

Cheshire Ecology Ltd.

Yorkshire Dales classification of protected areas into IUCN Management Categories. Mark Fisher, November 2013 Wildland Research Institute

Monitoring the Environmental Status of the Heart of Borneo

State of the National Park Report

Birch Point Provincial Park. Management Plan

State of Nature 2016

ABERDEEN HARBOUR EXPANSION PROJECT November Volume 3: Technical Appendices. Appendix 17-B SLVIA - ABERDEEN GREEN SPACE NETWORK

The Chilterns Conservation Board The Lodge Station Road Chinnor Oxon OX39 4HA

Natural Areas in the. Yorkshire & the Humber Region. helping to set the regional agenda for nature

Bayview Escarpment. Interim Management Statement

Recreational Carrying Capacity

4) Data sources and reporting ) References at the international level... 5

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

RE Code Names Each regional ecosystem is given a three part code number e.g For example

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

Whitemouth Falls Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

You can learn more about the trail camera project and help identify animals at WildCam Gorongosa (


EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG XI.D.2. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds. and

Strathaird and Torrin Estates Management Plan

Scheme Objective 1: To improve the operation of the A96 and inter-urban connectivity through:

Yorkshire Dales National Park Visitor Survey

Numaykoos Lake Provincial Park. Management Plan

Rocky Lake Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

APPENDIX G ECOLOGICAL REPORTS. G.2 Badger

RESPONSE TO AIRPORT EXPANSION CONSULTATION 27 MARCH 2018 Submitted online by Helen Monger, Director

David Magney Environmental Consulting

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Conservation Area Management Statement

What Is An Ecoregion?

The South Gippsland Koala. For over 60 years, the plantation industry has shared a unique relationship with the Strzelecki Koala. protection.

Pembina Valley Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Sand Lakes Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

SHEEPLEAS. Visitor Guide and Self-guided Trails

Management Issues in Atlantic N2K sites - a personal view from the Far West!

SANBI PLANNING FORUM

2.0 Physical Characteristics

+ Physical Influences

22. Tracking Malleefowl in the Little Desert National Park: A preliminary study of Malleefowl activity in the park

North Meadow National Nature Reserve

Visual and Sensory Aspect

CORNWALL AND ISLES OF SCILLY LANDSCAPE CHARACTER STUDY

Spatial Assessment for the revised Mpumalanga Biodiversity Expansion Strategy. Mervyn Lotter Scientific Services 8 June 2016

Parrie Yalloak addition to the Grampians National Park

Yorkshire Forum for Water Customers

Summary of prescribed fires in Prince Albert National Park 2015

Watchorn Provincial Park. Management Plan

Annual summary of projects

South Atikaki Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Victor Lake Park. Management Plan

Assessing and Protecting the World s Heritage. Assessing and Protecting the World s Heritage

1. Moorland. Landscape Character Areas. (1a) Western Moors. (1b) Central & Eastern Moors. (1c) Northern Moors

Europarc Atlantic Isles Exchange Programme: Germany: Rhön Mountains Summary of Events

Yard Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

Item 4. Agency Correspondence. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination. Ohio Department of Natural Resources

This document provides the key data and trends from the Heritage at Risk programme

Living & Working Access and Recreation

Analysing data on protected areas

Submission to NSW Koala Strategy Consultation Process. March 2017

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

Reaching the 2020 Targets with Blue-Green Infrastructure: Member State Perspectives ESTONIA

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

ALBERTA S GRASSLANDS IN CONTEXT

The Gaywood River Valley. A State of the Environment Report Summary

Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission July 10, Raquel Wertsbaugh, CNAP Coordinator

PRESPA BIOSPHERE RESERVE MANAGEMENT MACEDONIAN PERSPECTIVE

Anglian Water Flourishing Environment Fund

Corlea Archaeological. Settlement and Biodiversity. Project.

Beaver Creek Provincial Park. Management Plan

Silver-washed Fritillaries in the Straits Inclosure in July

Telecommunications Retail Price Benchmarking for Arab Countries 2017

Green Legacy. Securing our. Greenlands Strategy

Bedfordshire and Luton Species Action Plan: Hazel Dormouse

Limestone terraces (in the distance) and woodland on hills in the Upper Wharfedale valley

Oxfordshire Conservation Target Areas Mapping Project Report July 2006

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

Visit Wales Research Update

LIFE+ URBANCOWS - Restoration of urban coastal meadow complex in Pärnu town, Estonia. Bert Holm, PhD.

Connie Rudd Superintendent, Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park

AURORA WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Next steps, way forward

APPENDIX 'A' Summary of Sage Grouse Petitions Submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 1 (As of January 8, 2004)

Councillor Briefing on Elvetham Chase

Portage Spillway Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

National Park Service Wilderness Action Plan

Photo: Promotional logo for Dalesbound, Hannah Wallington.

Habitat Action Plan. Heathland

photos Department of Environment and Conservation Biodiversity Conservation

Wallace Lake Provincial Park. Management Plan

Pinawa Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Sutton and Hollesley Heaths Walk Guide

DIXIE HIGHWAY Region of Peel NAI Area # 1304, 1320, 2449, 2625, 3961

Oak Ridges Corridor Park East Management Plan

DIRECTOR S ORDER #41: Wilderness Preservation and Management

Transcription:

PRIORITY HABITAT SURVEY 2017 SWALEDALE Summary July 2018 Conservation & Monitoring Report No: Lead Author(s): Tony Serjeant & Sue Thurley Incorporating comments from: Gary Smith & Gordon Haycock (16/07/18)

Priority Habitat Survey 2017 in Swaledale Introduction The Yorkshire Dales National Park has been divided into ten distinct survey areas with the intent of surveying one area each year between 2010 and 2019. The aim of the survey is to assess the condition of Priority Habitats 1 outside of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) 2 across the entirety of the National Park. The results of these surveys is combined with the results of Natural England s surveys of Priority Habitats within SSSIs to give a much wider picture of the state of wildlife across the Yorkshire Dales National Park. Up to date knowledge of habitat condition is vital in order for the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority (YDNPA) and other agencies and bodies to deliver local Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) targets, advise on agri-environment schemes and for development control functions. In 2017 YDNPA commissioned an assessment of Priority Habitats in the following parishes in Swaledale: Arkengarthdale, Downholme, Ellerton Abbey, Fremington, Grinton, Healaugh, Hudswell, Marrick, Marske, Melbecks, Muker and Reeth. It was estimated that there is a total of 3,958 hectares of priority habitat outside of SSSIs in these parishes. The assessment was completed by the consultants Haycock and Jay Associates Limited. The condition assessment methodology was based upon that developed for the Environmental Stewardship scheme. Assessment forms are reproduced in Appendix 1. Any Priority Habitat found was mapped where necessary, condition assessed and placed in categories A, B or C depending on how many criteria it met. Any habitat in category A is considered to be in good condition. The consultants were provided by YDNPA with a map of the area of land to be surveyed. Assessment of Priority Habitat required walking a W transect and stopping 10-20 times to record a set of attributes. 1. Priority Habitats are habitats identified at a UK level as being of crucial importance for the conservation of biodiversity. More information is available at: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5718 2. SSSIs are sites afforded some legal protection because they support features of significance biologically and/or geologically in a national context. In England they are notified by Natural England. For more information see: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/protected-areas-sites-of-special-scientific-interest

Results Of the 116 landowners contacted, 54 (47%) allowed access on to their land to survey. In total, 1,676 hectares (ha) of land were surveyed. Habitat patches investigated ranged in size from very small areas (0.25 ha) to much larger blocks of land (up to 162 ha). 827.3 ha was found to be identifiable with Priority Habitat and, of the Priority Habitat on the land surveyed, 492.3 ha (29.4% of the land and 59.5% of Priority Habitat) was found to be in Condition A, meaning that it passed on all criteria relating to the quality of the vegetation as wildlife habitat. The results of the assessment are summarised in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Habitats recorded during 2017 survey in Swaledale (Grey indicates Priority Habitat) Habitat code Habitat name Total area (hectares) Area in Condition A % in Condition A G01 Improved grassland 16.4 N/A - G02 Semi-improved grassland 229.0 N/A - G04 Lowland calcareous grassland 5.7 3.9 68.4 G05 Lowland dry acid grassland 3.6 3.6 100.0 G06 Lowland meadows & pastures 59.0 26.8 45.4 G07 Purple moor-grass and rush pastures 7.9 1.4 18.2 G08 Upland calcareous grassland 58.6 32.7 55.8 G09 Upland hay meadows 51.9 11.9 22.9 G10 Calaminarian grassland 14.1 14.1 100.0 M01 Grass moorland and rough 475.4 N/A - grazing M02 Fragmented heath 36.4 N/A - M04 Upland heathland 35.5 13.2 37.2 M06 Blanket bog 477.8 379.3 79.4 M07 Inland rock outcrops, cliffs & 11.3 0.8 7.1 scree M08 Upland flushes, fens & swamps 50.7 1.3 2.5 T04 Broad-leaved plantation 0.3 N/A - T05 Conifer plantation 1.2 N/A - T06 Mixed woodland 28.8 N/A - T08 Native semi-natural woodland 31.7 2.6 8.2 T11 Upland mixed ashwoods 14.7 0.0 0.0 T12 Upland oak woodland 0.2 0.0 0.0 T13 Wet woodland 4.0 0.3 7.5 V02 Bracken 57.4 N/A - V03 Rank vegetation 3.1 N/A - V04 Scrub 1.1 N/A - W04 Fens 0.25 0.04 16.0 W07 Ponds 0.4 0.4 100.0 Totals (Priority Habitat) 1676.4 (827.3) 492.3 59.5

Discussion The survey results have substantially updated the level of knowledge of the extent and condition of habitats within the Swaledale parishes of the National Park. This will provide a strong platform for the future monitoring and planning of biodiversity conservation work within this area of the National Park (for example, during the Tees-Swale HLF Project). The results will be used in-house and will also be made available to others as part of the YDNPA Habitat Map available on https://data.gov.uk/. A direct comparison of these results with previous assessments in Swaledale is not possible because previous surveys have not always assessed the habitat condition. In addition, areas that have been previously assessed have frequently used a different methodology. The surveyors encountered several problems: In some instances the area mapped and the habitat listed was inaccurate and had changed substantially since the previous survey. In this instance the surveyor mapped existing Priority Habitat and assessed condition as appropriate. Mosaics of habitats are frequent. In these cases where possible each habitat was assessed independently and an estimation of percent cover of each component was made. Comparison can be made between the results from the 2017 survey and the 2016 Trends and Status Review (YDNPA 2017) that summarised results for the whole pre-extension National Park. The latter reported that 84% of the area of priority habitats in the YDNP is in good condition (just below the target of 85%). It should be noted that this figure includes SSSIs (which are condition assessed on a different basis) and the statistic for non-sssi land in the whole Park was substantially lower (22.4%). In this light, Swaledale s non-sssi habitats compare quite favourably with the Dales as a whole. However, there is room for improvement. Taking a look at broad habitat types:- Grassland Just under half of the species-rich grasslands surveyed in Swaledale (47.0%) were in good condition, with only about one third of upland calcareous grassland and less than one quarter of upland hay meadows being in Condition A. The Dales is particularly important for these Priority Habitats in a national and international context, so bringing these habitats into better condition should be viewed as an important goal.

Upland Habitats In this category are considered upland heathland, blanket bog, inland rock outcrops, cliffs & scree and upland flushes, fens & swamps. 68.6% of these Priority Habitats were assessed as being in good condition, including nearly four-fifths of the extensive blanket bogs that occur in Swaledale. Less encouragingly, less than 2% of wet flush, fen or swamp habitats were found to be in category A and the reasons for this will need to be investigated in more depth and appropriate action taken. Woodland The total amount of woodland of all types was found to be 80.9 ha or 4.8% of the land surveyed. This compares with 3.6% woodland cover for the pre-extension National Park. Woodland with enhanced nature conservation value (i.e. Priority Habitats) accounted for 50.6 ha (or 62.5%) of the woodland in Swaledale, which is a fairly high proportion. However, from the nature conservation perspective, only 5.7% of Priority Habitat was judged to be in good condition. Acknowledgements The Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority would like to thank all the Swaledale landowners who gave permission for their land to be surveyed. YDNPA also thanks Haycock and Jay Associates for its expert and assiduous work in conducting the surveys. References YDNPA (2017) Nature in the Dales 2020: The second Biodiversity Action Plan for the Yorkshire Dales National Park - 2016 Trends and Status Review Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority on behalf of the Yorkshire Dales Biodiversity Forum July 2017. TS 2017 Habitat Survey Report V1.3 (16/07/18)