NOTE TO MEMBERS #24 22 MAR 2017

Similar documents
Subject : Correct application of the strategic lateral offset procedures

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

Effective: AIRCRAFT WAKE TURBULENCE

SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR IN-FLIGHT CONTINGENCIES IN OCEANIC AIRSPACE OF SEYCHELLES FIR

CAUTION: WAKE TURBULENCE

SAFE WINGS. This issue WAKE-UP TO WAKE TURBULENCE. * For Internal Circulation Only

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

This Bulletin may be updated, as necessary, as progress is made toward the start date for Phase 2b of the NAT DLM.

AIR LAW AND ATC PROCEDURES

The NAT OPS Bulletin Checklist is available at & NAT Documents, NAT Documents, then NAT Ops Bulletins.

Pilot RVSM Training Guidance Material

When Plans Don t Go as Planned

2. CANCELLATION. AC 90-23F, Aircraft Wake Turbulence, dated February 20, 2002, is canceled.

INTERNATIONAL OPS NOTICE 04/16

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 11

WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA

IFR SEPARATION USING RADAR

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B.5.12 IFATCA 09 WP No. 94

ASSEMBLY 37TH SESSION

Overview. ETSO Workshop 2008 New Developments in Avionic. Friedhelm Runge

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR 33/17

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET 15c WAKE VORTEX

Advisory Circular. Flight Deck Automation Policy and Manual Flying in Operations and Training

CHINA RVSM I. F. A. L. P. A. Briefing Leaflet. RVSM Airspace. Air Traffic Services. The Global Voice of Pilots. China RVSM Airspace

SESAR Active ECAC ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Safety Brief. 21st March Operations in Somali Airspace

Overview of Worldwide Data Link Equipage Mandates

Subject: Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Operations and Operational Authorization

IATA In-flight Broadcast Procedure (IFBP) AFI Region

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

TCAS Pilot training issues

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

Briefing Leaflet. Recommended Procedures in the AFI Region 1. EXCERPT FROM THE IATA IN-FLIGHT BROADCAST PROCEDURE (IFBP): 17ATSBL07 07 July 2017

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

EASA NPA on SERA Part ENAV Response sheet. GENERAL COMMENTS ON NPA PACKAGE Note: Specific comments are provided after the General Comments

TRAFFIC ALERT AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM (TCAS II)

Operations Notice Number: ON 001/2014. IATA In-flight Broadcast Procedure (IFBP) Effective date: 9 January 2014

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

Lessons Learnt From The EUROCONTROL Wake Impact Severity Assessment Flight Simulator Campaign

Wake Turbulence: Managing Safety and Capacity. Bram Elsenaar co-ordinator of the European Thematic Network WakeNet2-Europe

NATA Aircraft Maintenance & System Technology Committee Best Practices. RVSM Maintenance

LFBO / Toulouse-Blagnac / TLS

PBN Operational Approval Oceanic and Remote En Route Navigation Specifications

AIRCRAFT INCIDENT REPORT

Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013

North Atlantic Initiatives

TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES INSPECTORATE. Title: CONSTRUCTION OF VISUAL AND INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURES

AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION

Implementing UPRT in an airline

Date: 5 November East of Frankfurt/Main

Air Navigation Bureau ICAO Headquarters, Montreal

Section 3. Wake Turbulence

CAR Section II Series I Part VIII is proposed to be amended. The proposed amendments are shown in subsequent affect paragraphs.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

Wake Turbulence Standards

20 Frequently Pondered Questions International Operations (May 2016)

Implementation of Strategic Lateral Offset Procedures

Chapter 6. Brize Radar, Speedbird 213 Heavy, request radar advisory. Speedbird 123 change call sign to BA 123

LARGE HEIGHT DEVIATION ANALYSIS FOR THE WESTERN ATLANTIC ROUTE SYSTEM (WATRS) AIRSPACE CALENDAR YEAR 2016

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FOR RPAS

Operational implementation of new ATM automated systems and integration of the existing systems ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION IN GUYANA. (Presented by Guyana)

Learning Objectives. By the end of this presentation you should understand:

LAPL(A)/PPL(A) question bank FCL.215, FCL.120 Rev OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 070

RNP OPERATIONS. We will now explain the key concepts that should not be mixed up and that are commonly not precisely understood.

ATM 4 Airspace & Procedure Design

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION FIRST MEETING OF DIRECTORS OF CIVIL AVIATION OF THE CARIBBEAN REGION (CAR/DCA/1)

PBN ROUTE SPACING AND CNS REQUIREMENTS (Presented by Secretariat)

IVAO Switzerland Division

Application Form and Compliance Checklist - OPS for NAT HLA (MNPS) Approval FORM Operator:

ADS-B Implementation and Regulation Meeting for the NAM/CAR/SAM Regions 26 to 30 November 2018 Mexico City, Mexico

IFR SEPARATION WITHOUT RADAR

MNPS (HLA), Oceanic, and Contingency Procedures

Advisory Circular. Regulations for Terrain Awareness Warning System

AIRBUS 12 th Performance and

All-Weather Operations Training Programme

Application of Wake Turbulence Separation at London Heathrow. Paul Johnson Development Manager NATS Heathrow

CPA2 1256: ft V/2.8nm H

Chapter 6. Airports Authority of India Manual of Air Traffic Services Part 1

NBAA IOC Oceanic Operations

Overview of ACAS II / TCAS II

SAFETYSENSE LEAFLET AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES OUTSIDE CONTROLLED AIRSPACE

Approach Specifications

International Civil Aviation Organization. PBN Airspace Concept. Victor Hernandez

ENR 1.1 GEN. RULES (Insert para 13 in ENR 1.1 of AIP India as follows)

PBN Airspace Concept. ATS requirements

THIS BULLETIN REPLACES BULLETIN WHICH IS NO LONGER CURRENT AND HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.

ICAO PBN CONCEPTS, BENEFITS, AND OBJECTIVES

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

SECTION 2 INTERNATIONAL OCEANIC AIRSPACE NOTICES

ATSAW. (Airborne Traffic Situational Awareness) Presented by Laurent VIDAL - Surveillance systems manager Support to sales & programs

GENERAL INFORMATION Aircraft #1 Aircraft #2

ICAO UPDATE. (Presented by the Secretariat)

AN INTRODUCTION TO PANS-AERODROMES (Doc 9981)

REPUBLIC OF SEYCHELLES CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE P.O.BOX 181, VICTORIA SEYCHELLES

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

AIRSPACE STRUCTURE. In aeronautics, airspaces are the portion of the atmosphere controlled by a country above its territory.

Transcription:

SUBJECT: ENROUTE WAKE TURBULENCE REVISED: 22 MAR 2017. CIRCULATION: PUBLIC SHARE FREELY. Situation/Event In January 2017, a Challenger 604 passed 1000 feet underneath an opposite direction Airbus 380, encountered wake turbulence, and lost control, rolling 3-5 times, engines flamed out, and lost 10,000 feet before recovering.the aircraft received damage beyond repair due to the G-forces, and was written off. There is now worldwide concern regarding the effects of A380 wake. Existing wake guidance A 2006 European study recommended a new category, Super, for the A380, due to its size. Behind an A380 on approach, you need 6nm in a heavy, 7nm in a medium, and 8nm in a light. For departures, 2 minutes is the minimum for all aircraft taking off behind an A380, increasing to 3 mins for light/medium, and 4 for intersection departures. The same study concluded that the A380 itself did not need any wake separation when following other aircraft, making it the only type to have this out. Enroute No A380 wake guidance exists enroute (in fact, very little enroute wake turbulence guidance of any sort exists, which is why we are publishing this note) which is the phase of flight in which the above incident happened. We believe that will change. In the interim, full use of the SLOP offset procedure by all crews can mitigate risk. This will be of particular value to light and medium category aircraft potentially passing through A380 wake enroute. SLOP Standard Lateral Offset Procedure SLOP allows an offset, usually 1 or 2nm to the right of track. First introduced as a NAT procedure in 2004, it s now mandatory there and allowed in many other FIR s. There are two reasons for SLOP. One is reducing collision risk, the other is avoiding wake turbulence, though until now that only really considered wake from traffic ahead. Where can I SLOP? The latest revision of ICAO Doc 4444 (Nov 2016) recommends that SLOP be authorised in all enroute airspace on routes spaced by 6nm or more. It is up to each country to implement this. This is still an ongoing process, so we ll list the special cases we know of here. Update us at intl.desk@fsbureau.org. Ü NAT Region since 2017, you must SLOP. Choose 1nm, 2nm (or centreline, but read below on why you shouldn t) Ref: NAT Doc 007, 2017. Ü The US says crews should use SLOP in Oceanic Airspace. It does not mention domestic. Ref: AIP, 10NOV2016 ENR 7.4 Ü China is a special case and dictates their own offsets, though the AIP allows 1nm and 2nm also.

Ü Africa ICAO recommended in 2010 that all FIR s allow SLOP throughout their airspace. We believe that all now do. Use together with the In Flight Broadcast Procedure (IFBP). Ü Australia is also a special case. You may only offset in the OCA, and, if you re still on radar, then you need to tell ATC, both when starting the offset, or changing it. Within domestic CTA airspace, you must fly the route centreline. Ref: AIP ENR 2.2 be because ATC mandates it (ie. no SLOP allowed), or because your aircraft can t (ie. It s old). Althought SLOP is generally allowed 0nm, 1nm, or 2nm right of track, the 0nm offset is by definition not an offset. Flying centreline: - increases the risk of collision with opposite direction traffic, either erroneously at the same level as you, or carrying out an emergency descent and not turning away from the centreline as they should. - increases the risk of wake turbulence from opposite direction traffic also on the centreline. Guidance While the regulatory documents catch up, we offer the following guidance. We do this to help you form your own opinion. Make sure you do that, and not just rely on our say-so. We might be wrong. We ve based this guidance on: Flight Service Bureau opinion and research, SKYbrary documentation, existing Aviation Authority guidance, and an official Safety Information Bulletin from EASA that has been sighted but not yet been published. Check ad.easa.europa.eu. The FAA will likely follow suit. Guidance for crews. SLOP If you can, do it. It may not prevent all situations, especially crossing traffic, but if you re 2nm right of track you re a lot less likely to be directly underneath or behind another aircraft. Check that SLOP is allowed in the particular airspace you re in before you make the offset. Always SLOP to the RIGHT. Centreline SLOP Our recommendation is not to fly the airway centreline unless you absolutely have to which will Visually spotting the wake Remember that the wake and the contrail are not always, and in fact unlikely to be, in the same place. The contrail comes from the engines, and the wake comes from the wings. While it may move away from the centerline in the same direction as the wake, the contrail will sit at altitude, while the wake drifts down, and, usually, the wake is invisible. NASA says it drifts down at, on average, 350 fpm, and settles about 1000ft below the flight path. Wake vortex decay is much slower below the tropopause. Just passed one what now? Each situation will require your judgement, but if you ve just gone directly under an opposite direction A380 or any any aircraft much heavier than yourself: - First, consider the wind. The danger point is roughly 15-20nm after the crossing point, as this is when the wake will have drifted down 1000 feet. In stronger winds, the wake may have drifted well away from the centreline. A turn away may not be necessary. - If you re in SLOP approved airspace, you don t need a clearance from ATC to turn away from the track you re on. Turn, if possible into wind for example from offset R1 to R2. No need to inform ATC (except for Australia).

- If you re in SLOP unapproved airspace, or you re not sure, consider talking to ATC and getting a clearance to turn into wind. - Switch on the seatbelt sign and secure the cabin. - Check TCAS below and see what s underneath you, just in case you do encounter an upset. Flying out of a wake upset From the FAA Pilot and Air Traffic Controller Guide to Wake Turbulence : An encounter with wake turbulence usually results in induced rolling or pitch moments; however, in rare instances an encounter could cause structural damage to the aircraft. In more than one instance, pilots have described an encounter to be like hitting a wall. The dynamic forces of the vortex can exceed the roll or pitch capability of the aircraft to overcome these forces. During test programs, the wake was approached from all directions to evaluate the effect of encounter direction on response. One item common to all encounters, was that without a concerted effort by the pilot the aircraft would be expelled from the wake. Counter control is usually effective and induced roll is minimal in cases where the wingspan and ailerons of the encountering aircraft extend beyond the rotational flow field of the vortex. It is more difficult for aircraft with short wingspan (relative to the generating aircraft) to counter the imposed roll induced by the vortex flow. Pilots of short span aircraft, even of the high performance type, must be especially alert to wake-turbulence encounters. The following is from an advance copy of an upcoming EASA SIB on Enroute Wake Turbulence (not yet released) - It has been demonstrated during flight tests that if the pilot reacts at the first roll motion, when in the core of the vortex, the roll motion could be amplified by this initial piloting action. The result can be a final bank angle greater than if the pilot would not have moved the controls. - In-flight incidents have demonstrated that pilot inputs may exacerbate the unusual attitude condition with rapid roll control reversals carried out in an out of phase manner. - Avoid large rudder deflections that can create important lateral accelerations, which could then generate very large forces on the vertical stabiliser that may exceed the structural resistance. Although some recent aircraft types are protected by fly-by-wire systems, use of the rudder does not reduce the severity of the encounter nor does it improve the ease of recovery. Guidance for controllers. We expect specific guidance to be issued by EASA, the FAA, and eventually individual Aviation Authorities and ATC agencies. The following is again from an advance copy of an upcoming EASA SIB on Enroute Wake Turbulence (not yet released) - Make use of the wake turbulence category (WTC) indication in the surveillance label and/or the flight progress strip (whether electronic or paper), and observe closely separated aeroplanes that are at the opposite extremes of the WTC spectrum - As the best practice, provide traffic information, advising CAUTION WAKE TURBULENCE, when you identify that a HEAVY or SUPER HEAVY wake category traffic is climbing or descending within 15 NM of another following traffic; - Manage en-route traffic crossings such as, when possible while preserving safe tactical management of overall traffic in the sector, avoiding to instruct climb or descent to HEAVY or SUPER HEAVY traffic within 15 NM distance from another following traffic; - If at all possible, avoid vectoring an aeroplane (particularly if it is LIGHT or MEDIUM category) through the wake of a HEAVY or SUPER HEAVY aeroplane where wake turbulence may exist. In the interim, as an enroute ATCO, consider the following. As with crew guidance, this is for you to think about, but make up your own mind if this suits your airspace and operation. We refer to the A380 here, but consider it also for any heavy aircraft where something a good deal smaller will come close.

- Crossing A380 traffic. The wake will trail downwards, at about 400 feet per minute. Traffic passing 1000 below and behind will be in its wake if it reaches the crossing point around 2 minutes later. Consider a small vector left or right to change the point of the cross. Remember that the wind will push the wake away a little. In this case you can judge it better than the crew. - Opposite Direction A380 traffic. Especially if the traffic below is much smaller, there is danger of an upset if the pass is exact. Strong wind will push the wake off the centreline. Consider informing the crew, and maybe offer a turn in advance should they decide they want it, traffic permitting. SLOP Rules and References ICAO Doc 4444 PANS-ATM, 2016 16 th Edition November 2016 Remember that ICAO issues the standards; each country has to implement them through the AIP, or AIC. Excerpt from Doc 4444, 16.5 Definition: SLOP are approved procedures that allow aircraft to fly on a parallel track to the right of the centre line relative to the direction of flight to mitigate the lateral overlap probability due to increased navigation accuracy, and wake turbulence encounters. 16.5.2 Strategic lateral offsets shall be authorized only in en-route airspace as follows: a) where the lateral separation minima or spacing between route centre lines is 23 NM or more, offsets to the right of the centre line relative to the direction of flight in tenths of a nautical mile up to a maximum of 2 NM; and b) where the lateral separation minima or spacing between route centre lines is 6 NM or more and less than 23 NM, offsets to the right of the centre line relative to the direction of flight in tenths of a nautical mile up to a maximum of 0.5 NM. 16.5.3 The routes or airspace where application of strategic lateral offsets is authorized, and the procedures to be followed by pilots, shall be promulgated in aeronautical information publications (AIPs). 16.5.4 The decision to apply a strategic lateral offset shall be the responsibility of the flight crew. The flight crew shall only apply strategic lateral offsets in airspace where such offsets have been authorized by the appropriate ATS authority and when the aircraft is equipped with automatic offset tracking capability. Note 1. Pilots may contact other aircraft on the inter-pilot air-toair frequency 123.45 MHz to coordinate offsets. Note 2. The strategic lateral offset procedure has been designed to include offsets to mitigate the effects of wake turbulence of preceding aircraft. If wake turbulence needs to be avoided, an offset to the right and within the limits specified in 16.5.2 may be used. Note 3. Pilots are not required to inform ATC that a strategic lateral offset is being applied.

NAT Doc 007 January 2017 8.5.2 SLOP This procedure provides for offsets within the following guidelines: a) along a route or track there will be three positions that an aircraft may fly: centreline or one or two miles right (Note: SLOP provisions as specified in ICAO PANS-ATM Doc.4444 were amended 13 November 2014 to include the use of micro-offsets of 0.1 Nms for those aircraft with this FMS capabilty. Appropriate guidance for the use of this amended procedure in the North Atlantic is under study and hence pending); b)offsets will not exceed 2 NM right of centreline; and c)offsets left of centreline must not be made. Further References v FAA Pilot and Controller Wake Turbulence Guide https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/media/wake/04sec 2.PDF v FAA AC-90-23G Wake Turbulence https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/a C_90-23G.pdf v Current A380 wake guidance http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/airbus_a380_wake_vortex _Guidance v ICAO Circular 331 - SLOP v Aviation Herald: A380 vs CL604 incident http://avherald.com/h?article=4a5e80f3 v ICAO Doc 4444 November 2016 http://flightservicebureau.org/2016-16th-edition-icao-doc-4444/ v ICAO NAT Doc 007 January 2017 http://flightservicebureau.org/2017-edition-nat-doc-007-northatlantic-airspace-and-operations-manual/ v This is what an A380 looks like when it s coming to get you http://flightservicebureau.org/this-is-what-an-airbus-380-lookslike-when-its-coming-to-get-you/ Feedback and Input We greatly appreciate commentary and information to allow us to keep this information current. Write to: pubs@fsbureau.org About this Notice Flight Service Bureau works to improve access to pertinent flight information and resources for Aircraft Operators (AO's), with an emphasis on International Flight Operations. Direct Service for Ferry and Ad-hoc flights is available through a network of Flight Service stations worldwide. www.fsbureau.org. Email: SITA: AFTN: Internet: intl.desk@fsbureau.org HNLFSXH SNNEIXH KMCOXAAL www.fsbureau.org O P S G R O U P is the heart of International Flight Operations: the Pilots, Dispatchers, Controllers, Managers, and Problem-Solvers of International Ops. OpsGroup members receive all FSB publications directly, free of charge. www.opsgroup.co