Calendar 217 Q1 Runway Safety Report Reporting Period 1 Apr 214-31 Mar 217 Prepared by Operational Analysis
Table of Contents Page Runway Incursions Dashboard................... 2 Total by Classification Total by Severity Total Pilot Deviations Total by Month Rate Per 1, Arrivals & Departures Runway Excursions Dashboard................... 3 Total Runway Excursions Total by Landing & Take-Off Total by FIR Total by Excursion Types Definitions for Runway Incursions & Excursions... Appendix A Definitions for Severity Categorization.......... Appendix B
Rate Runway Incursions Number of Incursions Number of Incursions Runway Incursions 1 Apr 214-31 Mar 217 14-15 Total Runway Incursions 15-16 16-17 A - Extreme Risk 35 3 Runway Incursions by Severity 436 441 438 B - High Risk 25 2 15 Runway Incursions by Classification AD 17 35 3 PD 834 374 VPD C - Some Risk D - Minimal or No Risk 1 5 14-15 15-16 16-17 A B 5 15 14 C 136 135 126 D 295 291 298 Total 436 441 438 25 2 7 Runway Incursions by Month *Total not to scale 15 6 1 5 14-15 15-16 16-17 AD 27 39 41 PD 291 272 271 VPD 118 13 126 AD ATS Deviation PD Pilot Deviation VPD Vehicle or Pedestrian Deviation 5 4 3 2 1 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar *Total 14-15 39 4 51 52 49 35 3 27 36 3 24 23 436 15-16 34 21 51 65 48 32 24 36 29 3 32 39 441 16-17 24 35 38 54 34 39 41 19 25 42 41 46 438 14-15 15-16 16-17 1 2 Pilot Deviations Airline Civil Military 76 73 83 188 196 215 *Includes Arrivals, Departures and Touch and Go practices at airports where NAV CANADA provides control or advisory services 1. 8. 6. 4. 2.. Runway Incursion Rate per 1, Arrivals and Departures* RI Rate Linear (RI Rate) Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar 1 2 3 Number of Incursions 14-15 14-15 14-15 14-15 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 16-17 16-17 16-17 16-17 Source: AOA, EXCDS
Number of Excursions Number of Excursions Number of Excursions Runway Excursions 1 Apr 214-31 Mar 217 Total Runway Excursions 14-15 15-16 16-17 7 7 6 6 5 5 Landing and Take - Off 6 5 6 4 4 3 3 FIR 14-15 12-13 15-16 13-14 14-15 16-17 2 2 1 1 Vancouver Edmonton 5 1 13 12 1 12 8 11 11 7 17 15 Landing Landing Takeoff TakeoffUndetermined Total Total 14-15 12-13 4752 6 8 1 654 15-16 13-14 524 8 1 56 16-17 14-15 454 1 6 7 657 Winnipeg Toronto 5 58 18 9 6 1 14 2 15 16 6 5 Excursion Types Landing Takeoff Montréal 1 1 12 1 9 14 4 3 2 7 6 Moncton Gander 2 3 2 5 2 3 1 1 Number of Excursions 2 1 32 27 36 3 16 3 11 14 3 4 2 14-15 15-16 16-17 14-15 15-16 16-17 14-15 15-16 16-17 14-15 15-16 16-17 Loss of Directional Control Landing Overrun Take-Off Overrun Undershoot on Landing 4 Source: AOA
Quarterly Runway Safety Report 1 Apr 214-31 Mar 217 Definitions Runway Incursion (RI) Runway incursions are tracked for aerodromes where NAV CANADA provides control or advisory services. Any occurrence at an aerodrome involving the incorrect presence of an aircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surface designated for the landing and take off of aircraft. ATS Deviation (AD) A situation which occurs when air traffic services are being provided and when a preliminary investigation indicates that safety may have been jeopardized, less than minimum separation may have existed, or both (Operating Irregularity). Pilot Deviation (PD) An action of a pilot that results in non-compliance with an ATC instruction/clearance or a violation of a Canadian Aviation Regulation Vehicle or Pedestrian Deviation A situation that occurs when a vehicle operator, a non-pilot operator of an aircraft, or a pedestrian proceeds without authorization onto the protected area of a surface designated for landing or taking-off. This classification includes security breaches but excludes animals. Runway Excursion (RE) A runway excursion occurs when an aircraft fails to confine its take off or landing to the designated runway. This may occur during the take off roll if the aircraft leaves the runway other than by becoming fully airborne or if an attempted landing is not completed within the confines of the intended runway. Source: NAV CANADA
Quarterly Runway Safety Report 1 Apr 214-31 Mar 217 Severity Categorization - Runway Incursions Category A Category B Category C Category D Extreme Risk High Risk Some Risk Little or No Risk Participants take extreme action to narrowly avoid a collision. E.G.: An aircraft aborts take-off or initiates a go-around over the threshold There is a significant potential for collision. E.G.: Action taken to remove aircraft or vehicle about the enter the runway during takeoff or landing There is ample time and distance to avoid a potential collision. E.G.: Aircraft pulled 2-3 miles on final Little or no chance of collision but meets the definition of a runway incursion. E.G.: Hold-Line transgression Available Reaction Time None, instantaneous reaction was required Minimal, barely adequate to take an emergency Adequate, sufficient time to smoothly execute an unplanned action Not a factor, adequate time to consider multiple alternatives Need for Evasive or Corrective Critical, radical evasive action was the only reason that a collision was avoided Essential, time-critical action required (or should have been taken) to ensure safety Required (or should have been taken) to ensure safety Evasive/Corrective action not necessary Action Aircraft/Vehicle Speed Extreme, one or both aircraft/vehicle travelling at a speed sufficient to reduce pilot or ATC reaction time. Potential to cause catastrophic damage or loss of life in the event of a collision High, potential for significant damage and Injury Moderate, aircraft/vehicle were moving fast enough to be of concern but speed was not a significant factor Slow, aircraft were travelling slowly; speed not a factor Proximity of Aircraft/Vehicle Near-miss, aircraft/vehicle travelling at high speed narrowly missing one another Very close, aircraft/vehicle approached one another at a high rate of speed Close, aircraft/vehicle approached one another at a low/ moderate rate of speed Not close, aircraft/vehicle did not approach one another Environmental Poor, definitely a factor Marginal, likely a factor but not overridingly important Fair, minimal influence on operational performance Good, played no role in the event Conditions Source: NAV CANADA