Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0. Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250

Similar documents
Arlington County Board Meeting Project Briefing. October 20, 2015

McLean Citizens Association Transportation Committee Project Briefing

DISTRICT EXPRESS LANES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017 JULY 1, 2016 JUNE 30, FloridaExpressLanes.com

Public Information Meetings. October 5, 6, 7, and 15, 2015

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

A Tour Across America s Managed Lanes Mike Heiligenstein, Executive Director Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority

HOV LANE PERFORMANCE MONITORING: 2000 REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

JATA Market Research Study Passenger Survey Results

Managing Mobility: Engineering an Express Lane Network

I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project Overview

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

Eleven things you should know about the carpool lanes in Los Angeles County.

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

High-Occupancy/Toll (HOT) Lanes and Value Pricing: A Preliminary Assessment

DEMOGRAPHICS AND EXISTING SERVICE

15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the Office of the Governor of the State of Texas, Energy Office

6 HIGH-OCCUPANCY-VEHICLE (HOV) LANES AND TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAMS

FASTRAK PROGRESS REPORT

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

AN ANALYSIS OF CASUAL CARPOOL PASSENGER BEHAVIOR IN HOUSTON, TEXAS. A Thesis JUSTIN R. WINN

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. HOV SYSTEM NOTES

New free City connector bus service

Selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative for the Interstate 405 Improvement Project Between State Route 55 and Interstate 605.

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

Transform66 Transportation Management Plan: Transit & TDM Strategies

MEMORANDUM. for HOV Monitoring on I-93 North and the Southeast Expressway, Boston Region MPO, November, 2011.

FIRST WEEK UPDATE: 66 EXPRESS LANES INSIDE THE BELTWAY Data from first four days shows faster, more reliable trips on I-66

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

FASTRAK PROGRESS REPORT

Like many transit service providers, the Port Authority of Allegheny County (Port Authority) uses a set of service level guidelines to determine

Role of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Lanes Highway Construction Management

I-405 Express Toll Lanes Coming in 2015

Assessment of Travel Trends

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

Improving Houston METRO HOV/HOT Lane Safety Fall TexITE: Fort Worth August 31 st, 2012 Dustin Qualls, PE, PTOE Nader Mirjamali, PE

Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

B. Congestion Trends. Congestion Trends

San Mateo County Transportation Authority Board Meeting November 2, 2017 Item #10 1

95 Express Managed Lanes Consolidated Analysis Technical Report

Public Transit Services on NH 120 Claremont - Lebanon

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

POTENTIAL SHIFT FROM TRANSIT TO SINGLE OCCUPANCY VEHICLE DUE TO ADAPTATION OF A HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE TO A HIGH OCCUPANCY TOLL LANE.

Washington State Transportation Commission

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

95 Express Monthly Operations Report May 2017

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Director King County Department of Transportation. King County Department of Transportation

95 Express Monthly Operations Report July 2017

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018

Fast Lanes Study Phase III Telephone Survey Results

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Tolling in Washington State. Craig J. Stone, P.E. Assistant Secretary, Toll Division

Slugging in Houston Casual Carpool Passenger Characteristics

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

LOS ANGELES COUNTY CONGESTION REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION INITIATIVE

Mount Pleasant (42, 43) and Connecticut Avenue (L1, L2) Lines Service Evaluation Study Open House Welcome! wmata.com/bus

Update on the I-680 Transit Corridor Improvement Project HOV on/off Ramps Environmental Impact Report Community Engagement Plan

COMPLETE TRANSPORTATION GUIDE TO SUPER BOWL LII IN THE BOLD NORTH

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

ROUTE 103. Morrisville Shopping Shuttle ROUTE OVERVIEW

METHODS TO IMPROVE HOUSTON CARPOOL INFORMATION

Trail Use in the N.C. Museum of Art Park:

Imagine the result. Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study. Laredo Urban Transportation Study. August 31 st, 2011

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

Congestion Pricing The Latest Weapon the U.S. War on Traffic Congestion. Darren Henderson, AICP

RESULTS FROM WYOMING SNOWMOBILE SURVEY: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Design Public Hearing

Part 1 Facility Description, Hours, Access and Occupancy (5) Type [5]

Impact of Carpool Tolls on Bay Bridge Casual Carpooling A Case Study

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

ACRP Synthesis 36 Exploring Airport Employee Commute and Parking Strategies. Diane M. Ricard, Principal DMR Consulting.

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

Kingston Transportation Master Plan Draft Report Transit Forecasting 1

Charlotte Regional Express Lane Facilities: I-485 and US 74. North Carolina Turnpike Authority March 21, 2018

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

Aviation, Rail, & Trucking 6-1

Evaluating Lodging Opportunities

Managed Lanes, Transit Access, and Economic Development: Implementing the Region s First Highway BRT Corridor

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

CHAPTER 1 TRANSIT MARKET AREAS AND EXISTING SERVICE

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

CobbLinc Forward Service Package

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

East Palomar Street Transit Station and Park & Ride Public Meeting Thursday, June 23, :00 to 8:00 p.m.

Transcription:

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 1 Corresponding Author Katherine F. Turnbull Executive Associate Director Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 3135 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3135 (979) 856-6005 Fax: (979) 845-6008 E-mail: k-turnbull@tamu.edu Co-Authors Ken Buckeye Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Department 395 John Ireland Blvd St Paul, MN 55155-1899 (651) 366-3737 Fax: (651) 215-0443 Email: kenneth.buckeye@state.mn.us Nick Thompson Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Department 395 John Ireland Blvd St Paul, MN 55155-1899 (651) 366-3152 Fax: (651) 215-0443 Email: nick.thompson@state.mn.us Word Count: 3,565 Number of Tables: 4 Number of Figures: 6 Number of Photographs: 0 Word Limit: 7,500 Tables/Figures Word Count = 2,250 I-35W SOUTH MNPASS HOT LANES

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 2 ABSTRACT The I-35W South MnPASS high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area were a major component of the Minnesota Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT). The use of the I-35W South HOT lanes is examined in this paper. Information on the number of MnPASS accounts, daily and monthly trips, monthly revenues, average tolls, and maximum tolls is presented. Changes in trip-time savings and trip-time reliability are also discussed. The results from a 2012 survey of I-35W MnPASS customers are summarized. This paper highlights key elements of the national evaluation of the Minnesota UPA related to the I-35W South HOT lanes. The national evaluation is sponsored by the U.S. DOT and conducted by a research team headed by Battelle Memorial Institute. As discussed in this paper, the I-35W South HOT lanes have attracted new MnPASS customers, while maintaining the travel-time savings and trip-time reliability for buses and carpools.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 3 I. INTRODUCTION The I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes were implemented as part of the Minnesota UPA. The project included expanding existing HOV lanes to HOT lanes, adding new HOT lanes, and converting an existing shoulder to a priced dynamic shoulder lane (PDSL). This paper summarizes the use of the I-35W HOT lanes. This paper highlights key elements of the national evaluation of the Minnesota UPA related to the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes. The national evaluation is sponsored by the U.S. DOT and conducted by a research team headed by Battelle Memorial Institute. An overview of the HOT lanes is provided next. The general design and operating strategy is discussed. Information on the number of MnPASS accounts opened and transponders issued is presented in Section III. Use of the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes by different user groups is discussed in Section IV. Enforcement of the I-35W MnPASS lanes is examined in Section V. The results of an online survey of I-35W MnPASS customers is presented in Section VI. Section VII provides concluding comments, including areas for further research. II. OVERVIEW OF THE I-35W MNPASS HOT LANES The HOT lane element of the Minnesota UPA included three components. The existing HOV lanes on I-35W from Burnsville Parkway to I-494 were expanded to HOT lanes effective September 30, 2009. The PDSL from 42nd Street northbound to downtown Minneapolis was also opened on September 30, 2009. The new HOT lane in the Crosstown Commons Section from I-494 to 42nd Street was opened on November 18, 2010. With the opening of this section, the HOT lanes are 16 miles in length in the northbound direction. Figure 1 shows a map of the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes. Single-occupant vehicles with a valid MnPASS transponder are able to use the HOT lanes and the PDSL during the HOT operating hours. Buses, vanpools, and carpools with two or more people are able to use the HOT lanes for free during the MnPASS operating period. The I-35W HOT lanes use the same technology and operating system as the I-394 HOT lanes, including electronic toll collection (ETC). MnPASS users lease small electronic transponders, which attach to the windshield of their vehicles. The toll is automatically deducted from the drivers pre-paid MnPASS account by toll recording equipment located along the HOT lanes. The I-35W HOT lanes use dynamic pricing, with the toll level varying based on the amount of traffic congestion in the HOT lane. Tolls are charged by the segment of the HOT lane a user travels. Electronic signs in advance of each entry point display the tolls by destination. The operating hours for the HOT lanes vary by direction and segment. The HOT lanes from Highway 13 to the Crosstown Commons section operate from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. in the northbound direction of travel. The HOT lanes and the PDSL from the Crosstown Commons section into downtown Minneapolis operate from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the northbound direction of travel. The HOT lanes are in operation in the southbound direction from 42nd Street to I-494 from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The southbound HOT lane from I-494 to TH 13 is in operation from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The HOT lanes are open to general-purpose traffic at other times. The PDSL is closed to through traffic and operates as a shoulder at all other times. Access points are provided at strategic locations along the 16 miles.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 4 III. I-35W MNPASS ACCOUNTS AND TRANSPONDERS A total of 8,233 new I-35W MnPASS accounts were opened August 2009 through December 2011. A total of 836 accounts were closed or are in collection/suspended status, resulting in 7,397 active accounts as of December 31, 2011. Approximately 52 percent of the I- 35W MnPASS accounts were opened from August to December, 2009, prior to and during the initial months of operation of the HOT lanes south of I-494 and the PDSL. The number of transponders purchased increased to approximately 250 a month in September and October and to almost 400 a month in November and December 2011, corresponding to the opening of the new HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section in November 2011. Registering on-line through the MnPASS website represented the most popular method to open a MnPASS account, with approximately 90 percent of I-35W MnPASS accounts opened on-line. Registering by phone/fax was slightly more popular at 5 percent, than using the mobile Customer Service Center (CSC) at 3 percent or registering in person at 2 percent. Individuals with MnPASS accounts may purchase multiple transponders. As of December 31, 2011, 8,425 transponders were assigned to I-35W MnPASS account holders. Approximately 88 percent of the I-35W MnPASS accounts have one transponder, 11 percent have two transponders, and 1 percent have three or more transponders. The growth in I-35W MnPASS accounts and transponders has been good in comparison to the HOV lanes on I-394, which were expanded to HOT lanes in 2005. As of December 31, 2011, there were 12,015 active MnPASS accounts on I-394, with 15,428 assigned transponders. The number of I-35W MnPASS accounts were at approximately 60 percent and the number of transponders were at approximately 54 percent of those on the six-year old I-394 HOT lanes. IV. USE OF THE I-35W MNPASS HOT LANES Data on daily and monthly trips, total revenue, the average toll, and the maximum toll in the monthly MnPASS reports were reviewed. Additionally, all MnPASS transactions on the I- 35W MnPASS HOT lanes were examined for October 2009 through December 2011. Table 1 presents the total MnPASS trips recorded by month and the total revenues. The trips are provided by the three sections northbound, southbound, and the PDSL. From October 2009 to October 2010, the northbound section extended from Highway 13 to I-494 and the southbound section was from I-494 to Highway 13. With the opening of the HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section in November 2010, the northbound section extended from Highway 13 to downtown Minneapolis and the southbound section extended from 42nd street to Highway 13. Use of the PDSL northbound from 42nd Street into downtown Minneapolis was included in the total northbound trips beginning in October 2010. The table illustrates the steady growth in use of the HOT lanes since 2009, and the significant increase from December 2010 through November 2011. This growth reflects the opening of the new HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section and the resulting completion of the 16-mile HOT lane from TH 13 into downtown Minneapolis in the northbound direction. Total use by MnPASS account holders increased from 24,754 monthly trips in October 2009 to a high of 60,937 total trips in November 2011. Total monthly revenues increased from $19,609 in October 2009 to a high of $102,578 in September 2011.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 5 Figure 2 presents information on the monthly use of the different segments of the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes during the morning peak hours in the northbound direction, based on the toll reader location. The figure highlights the growth in MnPASS use over time and the increase after the November opening of the HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section. The significant decline in use in July 2011 reflects the two-week shutdown of the Minnesota state government when the MnPASS system was not in operation. Figures 3 and 4 present information on the most frequently used sections of the MnPASS HOT lanes in the northbound and the southbound direction for the period from November 2010 through December 2011. As illustrated in Figure 3, the first and third most heavily used sections in the northbound direction begin at Highway 13 and end south of I-494. These MnPASS patterns reflect commute trips from southern suburbs to employment locations along I-494. The second most frequently used origin-destination pattern was from Highway 13 all the way into downtown Minneapolis, reflecting commute trips from southern suburbs into the downtown area. Figure 4 shows that the heaviest use of the MnPASS lanes in the southbound direction was also south of I-494, with the third highest use from 60th Street, just north of the Crosstown Commons section to Blackdog Road, south of the Minnesota River Bridge. These travel patterns reflect the reserve of the morning trips, with commuters traveling from employment locations along I-494 and in downtown Minneapolis to southern suburbs. Figure 5 presents a comparison of the total number of daily trips in November 2010 and in November 2011. Overall, daily use has increased by approximately 500-to-750 trips. Excluding the Thursday and Friday of Thanksgiving, total daily northbound trips in November 2011 ranged from a low of 1,354 to a high of 2,344. Daily revenue corresponds with these trends. The use by day of the week reflects a similar pattern throughout the month, with use levels lowest on Fridays and highest during the middle of the week. The average tolls on the HOT lanes in November 2010 were $1.19 in the northbound direction and $1.19 in the southbound direction. In comparison, the average tolls on the HOT lanes in November 2011 were $1.68 in the northbound direction and $1.33 in the southbound direction. The maximum toll in November 2010 in the northbound direction was $5.50 on one day. The maximum toll in November 2011 was $8.00 on four days and $7.00 on eight days. The higher tolls in 2011 reflect the use of the additional HOT lane segments in the Crosstown Commons section, as well as higher vehicle volumes in the lanes. Figure 6 presents the frequency of use of the I-35W HOT lanes. As illustrated, a large number of individuals only use the HOT lane one time per month. The number of once-a-week users has increased since the opening of the HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section in November 2010. There were 24 once-a-week users prior to November 2010. There were 39 once-a-week users between November 2010 and December 2011. Table 2 presents data from the MnDOT I-35W HOV Quarterly Reports. The data indicates that as of the July September 2011 Quarterly Report, vanpools and carpools comprised approximately 48 percent of the vehicles using the I-35W HOT lanes, compared to 38 percent MnPASS users, 2 percent buses, and 5 percent SOVs and toll violators. Table 2 presents information on use of the I-35W HOV lanes for October December 2008 and July September 2009 with January March 2010, and October December 2010, and July September of 2011

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 6 with MnPASS in operation. The vehicle volumes in the HOT lane continued to increase after the expansion from HOV to HOT operations and the opening of the new HOT lanes in the Crosstown Commons section. The total number of vehicles in the northbound direction in the morning peak period increased from 2,068 during October December 2008 to 2,815 in July September 2011. The table highlights the changes in user groups with the opening of the HOT lanes and ongoing use. In July September 2011, there were 1,267 tolled vehicles using the HOT lanes during the three-hour AM peak period, accounting for 45 percent of the total vehicles. Tolled vehicles accounted for 35 percent of the total users in the January March 2010 period and 38 percent in October December 2010 period. The number of carpools and vanpools declined from previous reports to 1,348, representing 48 percent of the total vehicles. The number of buses remained relatively constant, accounting for 2 percent of the total vehicles. The number of SOVs violating the operating requirements declined from 15 percent in 2008 to 5 percent in 2011. These figures indicate that the change from HOV to HOT operations and the addition of the new HOT lanes and the PDSL has resulted in a decline in carpooling and an increase in MnPASS use. Overall, users of the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes save time over travelers in the generalpurpose freeway lanes. MnPASS users accessing the HOT lanes for the full 16 miles in the morning peak period northbound direction save an average of 3-to-5 minutes over travelers in the general-purpose freeway lanes. Trip-time reliability, as measured by the Buffer Index, which represents the extra time travelers need to add to their average trip time to ensure an on-time arrival, is more stable in the HOT lanes. V. MNPASS ENFORCEMENT AND VIOLATIONS The Minnesota State Patrol provides regular traffic enforcement on I-35W South, as well as other freeways in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. In addition, MnDOT funds extra State Patrol coverage on the I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes during the morning and afternoon operating periods. Table 4 presents information from the Minnesota State Patrol provided by MnDOT on MnPASS HOT lane violations for the eight-month period from May through December 2011. The State Patrol issues citations and warnings for a number of violations, including MnPASS customers without active or engaged transponders, individuals without MnPASS accounts, and individuals crossing the double white lines separating the MnPASS lanes from the adjacent general-purpose freeway lanes. The no violation category represents vehicles which were stopped, but were found to meet the operating requirements. An example of this category is a vehicle with a second person that the officer could not see initially. As presented in Table 4, the majority of citations and warnings were issued to individuals driving alone in the MnPASS HOT lanes without a MnPASS account and active transponder. A total of 1,515 citations and 231 warnings were issued to drivers in this category over the eightmonth period. Discounting for July, when the MnPASS lanes were not in operation for 21 days due to the Minnesota state government shutdown, there were an average of 255 citations and warnings a month in these two categories. MnPASS customers with an inactive, malfunctioning, or not engaged transponder represent the second largest number of citations and warnings.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 7 Individuals illegally crossing the double white lines separating the MnPASS lanes from the adjacent general-purpose freeway lanes accounted for 32 citations and 134 warnings during the eight-month period. VI. ON-LINE MNPASS USER SURVEY An online survey of I-35W MnPASS account holders was administered by Cofiroute using Survey Monkey in January 2012. Individuals with active I-35W MnPASS accounts were sent an e-mail requesting that they complete the on-line survey. The e-mail included a survey identification number, which had to be entered to access the survey and to register the individual for the chance to be one of the five winners of $15 in toll credit vouchers. A total of 1,502 individuals completed the survey, representing a 20 percent response rate. Highlights from the survey results are summarized in this section. The majority of respondents, 60 percent, reported being a MnPASS customer for one-to-two years. Of the remainder, 21 percent reported having a MnPASS account for two-to-three years, 16 percent for six months-to-one year, and 3 percent for over three years. Slightly over half, 51 percent, reported making more than six one-way trips a week on I-35W, including trips taken in the I-35W MnPASS lanes. Only 17 percent reported using the I-35W MnPASS lanes for more than six one-way trips a week, however, with 12 percent reporting making five one-way trips a week, 22 percent making one or two one-way trips, and 2 percent making less than 1 oneway trip a week on the I-35W MnPASS lanes. Work commute trips represent 88 percent of reported trips, followed by work appointments, 12 percent; personal business, 11 percent; recreational, 4 percent; medical, 2 percent; and school, 2 percent. In response to a question on the MnPASS lane segments most frequently used (multiple responses possible), 73 percent identified using the MnPASS section northbound from Burnsville Parkway to Highway 62, 53 percent reported the corresponding southbound section from I-494 to Burnsville Parkway, 40 per cent reported using the northbound section from Highway 62 to downtown Minneapolis, and 25 percent used the southbound segment from 42nd Street to I- 494. Before becoming an I-35W MnPASS customer, 85 percent of the respondents reported driving alone in the general-purpose freeway lanes, 8 percent drove alone on another roadway, 2 percent did not make the trip, 2 percent carpooled in the HOV lanes, 1 percent rode the bus on the HOV lanes, and 1 percent drove alone in the HOV lane. Survey respondents were asked which of six factors influence their use of the MnPASS lanes, with multiple responses allowed. Congestion levels on the freeway lanes was selected by 94 percent of the respondents, followed by important work meeting cannot afford to be late with 62 percent, family

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 8 responsibilities cannot afford to be late with 31 percent, and personal business meetings cannot afford to be late with 19 percent. Survey respondents were asked to select the best things about traveling in the MnPASS toll lanes from a list of seven factors, with multiple selections possible. Time savings were selected by 93 percent of the respondents followed by 69 percent for less/no traffic, 69 percent for ability to travel faster, 60 percent for less stress/relaxing, and 50 percent for ease and convenience. Less wear and tear on an automobile was selected by 23 percent of the respondents and more safe/safety was identified by 20 percent. Separate, open-ended questions asked respondents how much time they saved per one-way trip during the morning and the afternoon rush hour when they used the I-35W MnPASS toll lanes. In the morning rush hour, approximately 8 percent of the respondents indicated they saved 30 minutes by using the MnPASS lanes, 18 percent reported saving 20 minutes, 22 percent reported saving 15 minutes, 22 percent said they saved 10 minutes, 8 percent reported saving 5 minutes, and 6 percent reported no time savings. A total of 56 percent of the survey respondents indicated that, in general, travel on I-35W is easier and less congested than a year ago, while 31 percent indicated congestion is about the same as one year ago, and 13 percent indicated it is more congested than one year ago. A total of 6 percent of the respondents indicated they carpool for free on the I- 35W MnPASS lanes extremely often or very often, while 11 percent reported carpooling somewhat often, and 83 percent reported carpooling not very often or not at all. Of those individuals carpooling, 82 percent reported sharing a ride with family members, 24 percent rode with co-workers or co-students, and 5 percent carpooled with neighbors. A total of 63 percent of the respondents agree to strongly agree that using the MnPASS toll lanes gives them value for the money. A total of 84 percent of the respondents indicated that, overall, they were satisfied with their experience using the I-35W MnPASS toll lanes. A total of 70 percent of the respondents indicated that the I-35W MnPASS toll lanes provide a fast, safe, reliable commute every time. A total of 73 percent of respondents rated the MnPASS toll lanes overall as safe to very safe. Slightly more males responded to the survey than females, with 52 percent males and 48 percent females. A majority of respondents, 56 percent, reported their total family income last year was $100,000 or more, compared to approximately 2 percent below $29,000, 7 percent in the $30,000-to-$49,000 range, 12 percent in the $50,000-to-$69,000 range, and 24 percent in the $70,000-to-$99,000 range. In terms of age, 34 percent of the respondents indicated they were between 45 and 54 years of age, 27 percent were in the 35-to-45 age group, 17 percent were 55-to- 64 years of age, and 13 percent were 24-to-34 years of age. Combined, the 18-to-

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 9 24 age group and the under 18 age group accounted for less than 1 percent of the respondents, and 6 percent of the respondents were 65 years of age and older. The vast majority of respondents, 95 percent, identified themselves as Caucasian/White, compared to a little over 1 percent for African American/Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino each. Only.3 percent of the respondents were American Indian. The majority of respondents, 56 percent, indicated they had two working automobiles available for their use, 21 percent reported one working automobile, 17 percent reported 3 automobiles available, and less than one percent indicated they did not have access to an automobile. VII. CONCLUSIONS The I-35W MnPASS HOT lanes added mobility options for travelers in the corridor. The MnPASS HOT lanes provided travel-time savings and trip-time reliability to MnPASS customers, carpoolers, and bus riders. Additional research would be beneficial to further explore how MnPASS customers make choices related to using the lanes or carpooling or taking the bus. Research examining the potential decline in carpoolers would also be beneficial.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 10 List of Tables TABLE 1 I-35W Total MnPASS Trips and Revenue by Month TABLE 2 Use of I-35W HOT Lane at Black Dog Road AM Peak Period, July September 2011 TABLE 3 Historical Use of I-35W HOV and HOT Lanes at the Minnesota River and Black Dog Road AM Peak Period (6:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m.) TABLE 4 MnPASS Violations May through December 2011 List of Figures FIGURE 1 I-35W MnPASS Express Lane Map FIGURE 2 Monthly I-35W MnPASS Trips Northbound in the AM Peak Period, Highway 13 to Downtown Minneapolis FIGURE 3 Total Northbound MnPASS Trips by Origin and Destination (November 2010 through December 2011) FIGURE 4 Total Southbound MnPASS Trips by Origin and Destination (November 2010 through December 2011) FIGURE 5 I-35W Daily Comparison MnPASS Trips November 2010 and November 2011 FIGURE 6 I-35W MnPASS HOT Lanes Frequency of Use

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 11 Table 1. I-35W Total MnPASS Trips and Revenue by Month Month Total Trips Northbound Southbound PDSL Total Total Revenue December 2011 34,149 21,028 * 55,177 $76,270 November 2011 38,972 21,965 * 60,937 $94,619 October 2011 37,533 21,382 * 58,915 $90,504 September 2011 38,163 21,532 * 59,695 $102,578 August 2011 36,258 21,938 * 58,196 $92,933 July 2011** 10,341 6,353 * 16,694 $23,108 June 2011 37,210 23,347 * 60,557 $90,818 May 2011 34,926 22,575 * 57,501 $81,906 April 2011 35,844 21,415 * 57,259 $84,066 March 2011 35,538 21,596 * 57,134 $75,034 February 2011 32,272 19,233 * 51,505 $71,119 January 2011 33,979 21,198 * 55,177 $82,523 December 2010 31,014 19,458 * 50,562 $74,388 November 2010 28,835 18,312 * 47,147 $54,141 October 2010 27,180 16,459 * 43,639 $43,766 September 2010 22,309 15,599 3,939 41,847 $41,414 August 2010 19,537 13,691 2,486 33,843 $26,055 July 2010 18,039 12,915 2,607 33,561 $26,107 June 2010 21,151 14,947 3,081 39,179 $36,824 May 2010 20,036 13,906 3,101 37,043 $34,554 April 2010 21,123 14,743 3,452 39,318 $36,959 March 2010 20,798 14,192 3,778 38,768 $32,820 February 2010 17,811 12,069 3,576 33,456 $28,736 January 2010 17,863 12,439 3,331 33,633 $31,647 December 2009 14,801 11,460 2,986 29,247 $26,486 November 2009 14,558 10,065 2,573 27,196 $20,871 October 2009 13,521 9,111 2,392 24,754 $19,609 Source: MnPASS Express Lane Monthly Report, Cofiroute USA. *PDSL was combined with northbound totals. **Due to the Minnesota state government shut down from July 1 to July 21, 2011, the MnPASS lanes were not in operation for 15 weekdays from July 1 to July 15, 2011.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 12 Table 2. Use of I-35W HOT Lane at Black Dog Road AM Peak Period, July September 2011 6:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 8:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. Total 6:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. Vehicle Percent Vehicle Percent Vehicle Percent Vehicle Percent Total Vehicles 1 704 1,234 877 2,815 Carpools/Vanpools 2 247 35% 604 49% 497 57% 1,348 48% Tolled at Black Dog 3 Road 379 54% 563 46% 325 37% 1,267 45% Transit Buses 4 17 2% 27 2% 14 2% 58 2% SOVs (Violators) 5 61 9% 40 3% 41 4% 142 5% Source: I-35W HOV Report, Including MnPASS Data 2011 3 rd Quarter July-September, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Regional Management Center. 1 Average weekday volume northbound July September 2011 from loop detector data. 2 Total vehicles less tolled vehicles, SOVs, and buses. 3 MnPASS data. 4 Number of transit buses northbound during January March 2010 (MVTA only). 5 Average percent SOVs northbound in three-day study in spring 2010 x total vehicles.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 13 Table 3. Historical Use of I-35W HOV and HOT Lanes at the Minnesota River and Black Dog Road AM Peak Period (6:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m.) October- December 2008 July- September 2009 January- March 2010 October- December 2010 July- September 2011 Vehicle % Vehicle % Vehicle % Vehicle % Total Vehicles 1 2,068 1,896 2,428 2,556 2,815 Carpools/Vanpools 2 1,718 83% 1,576 83% 1,406 58% 1,401 55% 1,348 48% Tolled at Black Dog 3 0 0 848 35% 969 38% 1,267 45% Road Transit Buses 4 47 2% 42 2% 46 2% 53 2% 58 2% SOVs (Violators) 5 303 15% 278 15% 127 5% 133 5% 142 5% Source: I-35W HOV Report, Including MnPASS Data 2009 4 th Quarter October December, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Regional Management Center. I-35W HOV Report, Including MnPASS Data 2010 1 st Quarter January March, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Regional Management Center. 3 rd Quarter July September, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Regional Management Center. 1 Average weekday volume northbound during reporting period from loop detector data for all quarterly reports. 2 Average percent carpools/vanpools northbound from October 2005 study x total vehicles for 2008 and 2009 quarterly reports. Total vehicles less tolled vehicles, SOV (violators), and buses for 2010 quarterly report. 3 MnPASS data. 4 Number of transit buses northbound during reporting period (MVTA only) prior to July September 2010. MVTA and one Metro Transit route from October December 2010 on. 5 Average percent SOVs northbound in 1997 three-day study and two-day 2001 study x total vehicles for 2008 and 2009 quarterly reports. Average percent SOVs northbound in three-day study in spring 2010 x total vehicles for 2010 quarterly reports. Month Table 4. MnPASS Violations May through December 2011 MnPASS Account Holders Citations Warnings No Violations Non-MnPASS Account Holders Citations Warnings No Violations Crossing Double- White Lines Citations Warnings May 6 15 31 190 39 35 4 29 June 5 25 23 179 25 31 6 14 July 2 3 11 81 11 11 6 August 9 9 23 204 36 31 1 15 September 6 10 32 254 41 33 3 22 October 8 9 28 204 34 43 5 16 November 6 8 25 207 25 39 1 20 December 10 7 28 196 20 32 12 12 Total 52 86 201 1,515 231 255 32 134 Source: Minnesota State Patrol.

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 14 Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation. Figure 1. I-35W MnPASS Express Lane Map

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 15 Source: Data from Cofiroute USA and analyzed by TTI. Figure 2. Monthly I-35W MnPASS Trips Northbound in the AM Peak Period, Highway 13 to Downtown Minneapolis

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 16 Source: Data from Cofiroute USA and analyzed by TTI. Figure 3. Total Northbound MnPASS Trips by Origin and Destination (November 2010 through December 2011)

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 17 Source: Data from Cofiroute USA and analyzed by TTI. Figure 4. Total Southbound MnPASS Trips by Origin and Destination (November 2010 through December 2011)

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 18 Figure 5. I-35W Daily Comparison MnPASS Trips November 2010 and November 2011

Katherine F. Turnbull, Ken Buckeye, Nick Thompson 19 Figure 6. I-35W MnPASS HOT Lanes Frequency of Use