South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 4 6/06 Quarterly Report (C-15397)

Similar documents
Little Venice Water Quality Monitoring 2002 Annual Report

Estuaries of South America

Effects of Groundwater on Salinity in Biscayne Bay

Gliders and Autonomous Underwater and Surface Vehicles

Land-Use and Water Quality Across the Cape Fear River Basin, NC: from 2001 to Jennifer Braswell Alford, PhD

Project: Profiling Float Observations in the Aegean Sea

C. Area of operation: Columbia River and Columbia River Estuary between mouth of estuary and Portland, Oregon.

Tufts University Water: Systems, Science, and Society (WSSS) Program

Appendix E. Pollutant Load Maps of SWAT Model Results

Outline. The main objectives. The main objectives. Distribution of stable isotopes in the Sava River in Serbia

Report from the SMHI monitoring cruise with R/V Aranda

Size data for all Gulf areas are available starting Fishing areas in the Headboat survey are described in Table 1.

Droughts: while tree islands can expand, can tropical hardwood hammocks VANISH? Tropical Hardwood Hammocks along a water availability gradient

MARINA BOLADO PENAGOS A METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE ROLE OF THE RIVER DISCHARGES TO THE GULF OF CADIZ ON THE NUTRIENT SUPPLY TO THE ALBORAN SEA

Aquatic insect surveys at Mount Magazine State Park and Hobbs State Park Conservation Area with implementation of an educational component

Georgia Coastal Ecosystems Long Term Ecological Research Project Marsh Hammock Research 2008

Heathrow Airwatch Quarterly Report

Restoration History Of Anitra Thorhaug, Phd.

Assessment of Pathogen Strategies

April 2012 Visitor Profile

Cruise Report HE-425, 23. May 07. June 2014

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau January 2018 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau August 2018 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau October 2018 Visitor Profile

Title/Name of the area: Chwaka Bay, Zanzibar

DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/21/2018. Windom Southern

DIDYMO SURVEY, LOWER FRYINGPAN RIVER, BASALT, COLORADO 2015

FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA SUMMARY SHEET

Quarterly Report. 4 December February 2014

Water Quality Trends for Patchogue Bay

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau January 2016 Visitor Profile

On the Edge with Mangroves

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2013 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2014 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau January 2013 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau November 2012 Visitor Profile

Mechanisms Controlling Hypoxia: Integrated Coastal Modeling Field Year 2010

Rainfall influence upon nutrient inputs to Caribbean coastal systems. Tim Carruthers

SeagrassNet Monitoring in Great Bay, New Hampshire, 2016

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau September 2013 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau June 2018 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau February 2017 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau December 2017 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau March 2018 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau February 2013 Visitor Profile

March 2012 Visitor Profile

November 2011 Visitor Profile

Effect of Hurricane Charley on smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata) nursery habitats in Charlotte Harbor, Florida.

2005 COLLIER COUNTY HIGH SEASON VISITOR PROFILE

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau March 2013 Visitor Profile

The effect of Lake Champlain s water quality on tourism and recreation Arelis Enid Girona Dávila

Exploring Drivers of Fecal Coliform Pollution Trends in the Puget Sound. Washington Commercial Shellfish

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 07/24/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 07/16/2018

Water resource situation of the Republic of Djibouti

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Cruise Report R/V "HEINCKE" Cruise- No. HE-316 ( 06HK1001 ) 27 January - 05 February This report is based on preliminary data!

Cruise Report R/V "ALKOR" Cruise- No. HE-365 ( 06AK1101 ) 01 February - 13 February This report is based on preliminary data!

Welcome to Marco Island

Using Gliders to Resolve Dynamics of Dust and Phytoplankton in the Mediterranean

SAM S CLUB PLAZA 315/335 SW PINE ISLAND RD CAPE CORAL, FL 33991

June 2009 Visitor Profile

COLLIER COUNTY 2004 WINTER VISITOR PROFILE

What Is An Ecoregion?

BROWARD COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION ZONES

Potential of CO 2 retrieval from IASI

Using Gliders to Resolve Dynamics of Dust and Phytoplankton in the Mediterranean

Pinellas County Environmental Lands

Elkhorn Slough Tidal Wetland Project

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monitoring for the Sleepy Creek Watershed Incremental 319 Project Final Report

SAM S CLUB PLAZA 315/335 SW PINE ISLAND RD CAPE CORAL, FL 33991

Unit 1 Lesson 1: Introduction to the Dry Tortugas and Sustainable Seas Expedition

October 2011 Visitor Profile

Toll Rates for Florida Turnpike System and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Toll Facilities. South Florida

SAND TIGER SHARK (SoC)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Florida s Paradise Coast. Leading the Way to Prosperity

River Center 805 North US Hwy One Jupiter, Florida 33477

Stakeholder Meeting #1. An Introduction to the Blind Pass Inlet Management Study

Temperature affects the silicate morphology in a diatom

Long Pond Study

Aquatic Organic Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes, Water Quality, and Aquatic Productivity in the Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana 1

Monitoring the marine environment

MARTIN COUNTY MANATEE PROTECTION ZONES

SECTION II CORRECTIONS TO C. G. LIGHT LIST, VOLUME I ATLANTIC COAST, (5) Height. (4) Characteristic Marina Buoy 3 Remove from list.

Visit Tallahassee. Economic Impact of Tourism Report Fiscal Year 2016

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

Paso Robles Groundwater Basin: Effects of Geothermal Waters on Water Quality and Availability

Water quality monitoring and analysis of fecal coliform of Canadarago Lake tributaries and outlet

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Supplemental Information


March 2011 Visitor Profile

MONTHLY MARKET REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2015

Evaluation of Predictability as a Performance Measure

Water Quality Monitoring and Validation from NOAA operational satellite sensor (VIIRS) Data Products in Coral Reef Environments

Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Principal Investigator One Year Update Workshop

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS LESSON PLAN Water Parks

Janice Sendt Thales Underwater Systems, Thales Australia, 274 Victoria Road, Rydalmere nsw 2116 Australia

Transcription:

Florida International University FIU Digital Commons SERC Research Reports Southeast Environmental Research Center 9-23-26 South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 4 6/6 Quarterly Report (C-1397) Joseph N. Boyer Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, boyerj@fiu.edu Henry O. Briceño Southeast Environmental Research Center, Florida International University, bricenoh@fiu.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Boyer, Joseph N. and Briceño, Henry O., "South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 4 6/6 Quarterly Report (C-1397)" (26). SERC Research Reports. 29. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/sercrp/29 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Southeast Environmental Research Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in SERC Research Reports by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu.

Southeast Environmental Research Center OE-148 Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199-348-9, -348-96 fax, http://serc.fiu.edu Patrick Martin SFWMD 8894 Belvedere Road West Palm Beach, FL 33411 23 September 26 Re: South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network 4-6/6 Quarterly Report (C-1397) Dear Mr. Martin: This letter serves to transmit the South Florida Coastal Water Quality Monitoring Network Quarterly Report as per our SFWMD/SERC Cooperative Agreement #C-1397. This report consists of this letter along with corresponding tables and figures. Project Background This report includes water quality data collected monthly during the annual period of record (POR) April June 26 from 28 stations in Florida Bay, 22 stations in Whitewater Bay, stations in Ten Thousand Islands, stations in Biscayne Bay, and 28 stations in Cape Romano-Rookery Bay-Pine Island Sound. A total of 49 stations were also collected on the SW Florida Shelf on a quarterly basis. Figure 1 shows the location of the fixed sampling stations. Water quality parameters monitored at each station include the dissolved nutrients nitrate + nitrite (NO x ), nitrite (NO 2 ), nitrate (NO 3 ), ammonium (NH 4 ), inorganic nitrogen (), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP). Silicate (Si(OH) 4 ) was analyzed at all stations on a quarterly basis in conjunction with SW Shelf sampling. Total concentrations of nitrogen (TN), organic nitrogen (TON), phosphorus (), and organic carbon (TOC) were also measured. All concentrations for each of these parameters are reported as parts per million () except where noted. Biological parameters monitored included chlorophyll a (µg l -1 ) and alkaline phosphatase activity (APA; µm hr -1 ). Field parameters measured at both surface and bottom of the water column include salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO; mg l -1 ), and temperature ( o C). Turbidity (NTU) of the surface water was also measured.

Data Results A previous spatial analysis of data from Florida Bay resulted in the delineation of 3 groups of stations which have robust similarities in water quality (Fig. 2). We have argued that these spatially contiguous groups of stations are the result of similar loading and processing of materials, hence we call them 'zones of similar influence'. The Eastern Bay zone (FBE) acts most like a 'conventional' estuary in that it has a quasi-longitudinal salinity gradient caused by the mixing of freshwater runoff with seawater. In contrast, the Central Bay (FBC) is a hydrographically isolated area with low and infrequent terrestrial freshwater input, a long water residence time, and high evaporative potential. The Western Bay zone (FBW) is the most influenced by the Gulf of Mexico tides and is also isolated from direct overland freshwater sources. Station #7 - Highway Creek did not cluster out with any of the Florida Bay stations and was considered separately. Using the same statistical approach as above, the TTI-WWB complex was partitioned into 6 distinct zones of similar water quality (Fig. 3). The first cluster was composed of 13 stations in and around the Shark, Harney, Broad, and Lostmans Rivers and is called the Mangrove River (MR) group. This cluster also included a sampling station just off the Faka Union Canal. The second cluster was made up of the 8 stations enclosed within Whitewater Bay proper (WWB). Twelve stations situated mostly in and around the coastal islands of TTI-WWB formed the Gulf Island group (GI). The water quality characteristics at the Coot Bay site were sufficiently different so as to be a cluster of its own. The next cluster contained the northernmost 2 stations in the Blackwater River estuary (BLK). Finally, the Inland Wilderness Waterway zone (IWW) included 11 stations distributed throughout the inside passage as well as the Chatham River and the station off Everglades City. Biscayne Bay was partitioned into 6 distinct ZSI using the above statistical analysis. The first cluster was composed of 2 stations closest to the shore in the south Bay (Fig. 4); they were called the Alongshore group (AS). These are stations most influenced by the Goulds, Military and Mowry Canals. The second cluster was made up of the stations farther from the coast called Inshore (IS). Thirteen stations situated mostly in the bay proper were called the main Bay (MAIN) group. The next cluster contained 3 stations situated in areas of great tidal exchange (ocean channel, not shown). Two stations in Card Sound grouped together SCARD. For purposes of this report, the stations added to the area north of the Rickenbacker Causeway are defined, a priori, as a distinct cluster, North Bay (NBAY). The above statistical analysis objectively classified the 49 Shelf sampling sites into 3 zones having similar water quality (Fig. ). The first cluster was composed of only 2 stations which were closest to the shore off Cape Sable; they were called the SHARK group, after the Shark River, the main source of freshwater to the region. The second cluster was made up of the 7 more northerly stations nearest the coast and called SHOAL. The remaining stations were called the SHELF group. Sampling in the Rookery Bay area began Jan. 1999. Because of the very heterogeneous nature of the area, we will continue to use generally accepted geomorphological characteristics to group the stations (Fig. 6). These groupings are Cocohatchee River (COCO), Estero Bay (EST), Cape Romano-Marco Island (MARC), Naples Bay (NPL), Pine Island Sound (PIS), Rookery Bay (RB), and San Carlos Bay (SCB).

Data are also reported as box-and-whiskers plots (Figs. 7-29). The center horizontal line in the box is the median of the data, the top and bottom of the box are the th and 7 th percentiles (quartiles), and the ends of the whiskers are the th and 9 th percentiles. Summary statistics of all water quality parameters by ecosystem are shown in Table 1. The median was chosen because it is a more accurate measure of central tendency in non-normally distributed water quality data. The range is expressed as the minimum (Min.) and maximum (Max.) values for the POR, and n is the number of data points used in the analysis. The cyanobacterial bloom in Eastern Florida Bay continued through this period (Fig.7). We are not sure as to the cause of the bloom but it was widespread affecting Card Sound, Barnes Sound, Manatee Bay, Blackwater Sound, Little Blackwater Sound, and most of Eastern Florida Bay. We will continue to analyze this and ancillary data and hope to find the cause. Note that 26 and have been some of the highest levels ever seen in Eastern Florida Bay (Fig. 29). If you have any questions about the content of this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at - 348-76 or boyerj@fiu.edu. Sincerely, Joseph N. Boyer, Ph.D. Associate Director and Scientist Henry O. Briceño, Ph.D. Assistant Scientist

Figure 1: All fixed water quality stations funded by this SFWMD project.

.4 Florida Bay Water Quality Zones.2. 24.8-81.2-81. -8.8-8.6-8.4-8.2 Eastern Bay ( ), Central Bay, ( ), Western Bay ( ) Figure 2. Florida Bay zones.

26. 74 7 Blackwater River 7 73 72 71 69 Faka Union Canal 68 64 67 6 66 1 4 2 Gulf Islands 6Inner Waterway 6 8761 Everglades 9 City 62 63 Mangrove Rivers 29 31 32 33 34 36 37 38 39 41 4244 Whitewater 4 Bay 43 46 47. 48 49 Coot Bay -81. -81.. Mangrove Rivers, Whitewater Bay, Gulf Islands, Coot Bay, Blackwater River, Inner Waterway Figure 3. WWB-TTI water quality zones.

26. 133 134 132 131 Miami 129 1 128 126 127 14 13 12 19 18. 111 11 11 124 123 113 122 116 112 1 121-8.4-8.3-8.2-8.1 Alongshore, Inshore, Main Bay, North Bay, South Card Sound Figure 4. Biscayne Bay water quality zones.

26. 363 364. 362 361 36 36 366 367 38 386 384387 383 388 9 368 382 389 8 369 381 39 7 37 38 391 6 371 379 392 399. 4 3 372 373 374 378 377 376 393 394 39 398 397 396 2 37 1 24. -82. -81. -81. Figure. SW Florida Shelf water quality zones. Shark, Shoal, Shelf

26.7 26.6 26. Pine Island Sound 26.4 San Carlos Bay Estero Bay 26.3 26.2 26.1 Naples Bay 26. Rookery Bay.9 Marco Island.8-82.3-82.2-82.1-82. -81.9-81.8-81.7-81.6 Figure 6. SW estuaries.

Eastern Florida Bay Zone 1 2 6 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12.2.4.6.8 1. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 2 4 6 8 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 2. 4. 6. 8. 1 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 Figure 7. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Eastern Florida Bay by survey.

Central Florida Bay Zone 1 2 6 7 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12.2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 2 4 6 8.12.14 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12. 1 1. 2. 3 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 Figure 8. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Central Florida Bay by survey.

Western Florida Bay Zone 1 2 6 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12.1.2.... 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12.1.2. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12. 1 1. 2. 1989-6 199-1 199-6 199-11 1991-4 1991-1 1992-3 1992-8 1993-1 1993-6 1993-11 1994-4 1996-11 1997-4 1998-2 1999-6 21-12 Figure 9. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Western Florida Bay by survey.

Whitewater Bay Zone 1 1 2 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1993-12 1994-1994-1 1996-11 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 21-1 23-6 24-4.2... 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1993-12 1994-1994-1 1996-11 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 21-1 23-6 24-4 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1993-12 1994-1994-1 1996-11 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 21-1 23-6 24-4. 1 1. 2. 3 1992-9 1993-2 1993-7 1993-12 1994-1994-1 1996-11 1998-8 1999-2 1999-12 21-1 23-6 24-4 Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Mangrove Rivers Zone 1 1 2 4 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9.2... 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9 2 4 6 8.12.14 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9. 1 1. 2 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9 Figure 11. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Gulf Islands Zone 1 1 2 4 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9.1.2. 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9.1.2 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9. 1 1. 2 1992-9 1993-1 1993-1993-9 1994-1 1994-199-1 199-1996- 1997-1 1998-1999-2 1999-6 2-2 2-6 21-6 21-1 22-6 23-6 -9 Figure 12. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Inner Waterway Zone 1 1 2 4 199-6 1996-1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-4 21-1 22-4 23-4 24-4.1.2... 199-6 1996-1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-4 21-1 22-4 23-4 24-4.1.2 199-6 1996-1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-4 21-1 22-4 23-4 24-4. 1 1. 2. 199-6 1996-1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-4 21-1 22-4 23-4 24-4 Figure 13. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Blackwater River Zone 1 1 2 4 199-6 1996-2 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-8 24-8.1.2.. 199-6 1996-2 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-8 24-8.1.2. 199-6 1996-2 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-8 24-8. 1 1. 2 199-6 1996-2 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-8 24-8 Figure 14. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in WWB-TTI by survey.

Alongshore Zone 1 1 2 4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8.2.4.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1 2 3 4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 Figure 1. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Inshore Zone 1 1 2 4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8.1.2.3.4..6.7.8.9 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1 2 3 4 6 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 Figure 16. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Main Bay Zone 1 1 2 4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8.1.2.3.4. 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1 2 3 4 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1993-9 1993-12 1994-3 1994-6 199-6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 Figure 17. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

South Card Sound Zone 1 1 2 4 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-6 21-12 22-6 22-12 23-6 23-12 24-12 -9 26-3.1.2. 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-6 21-12 22-6 22-12 23-6 23-12 24-12 -9 26-3 1 2 3 4 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-6 21-12 22-6 22-12 23-6 23-12 24-12 -9 26-3 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1993-1 1994-1 1994-4 1994-7 1994-1 199-1 199-4 199-7 199-1 1996-4 1996-7 1996-1 1997-1 1997-4 1997-7 1998-4 1998-11 1999-2 1999-8 2-2 2-8 21-6 21-12 22-6 22-12 23-6 23-12 24-12 -9 26-3 Figure 18. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

North Bay Zone 1 1 2 4 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8.1.2.... 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1 2 3 4 6 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 1997-3 1997-6 1998-6 1999-4 21-8 24-8 Figure 19. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in Biscayne Bay by survey.

Shelf Zone 1 1 2 4 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 2 4 6 8 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1 2 3 4 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 2. 4. 6. 8. 1 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 Figure 2. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Shark Zone 1 1 2 4 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 2 4 6 8.12 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 Figure 21. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Shoal Zone 1 1 2 4 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1 2 3 4 6 7 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1 2 3 4 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 1. 2. 3. 4.. 6. 7. 199-1996-7 1996-1 1997-2 1997-7 1998-4 22-4 23-4 24-4 Figure 22. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in SW Florida Shelf by survey.

Marco Zone 1 1 2 4.1.2. 2 4 6 8.12.14. 1 1. 2. Figure 23. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Rookery Bay Zone 1 1 2 4.1.2.. 2 4 6 8.12. 1 1. 2. 3 Figure 24. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Naples Zone 1 1 2 4.1.2. 2 4 6 8.12.14 2. 4. 6. 8. 1 12. 14. 16. 18. Figure. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

San Carlos Bay Zone 1 1 2 4.2....6.7.1.2. 1 1. 2. 3 Figure 26. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Estero Bay Zone 1 1 2 4.1.2..1.2. 1 1. 2 Figure 27. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

Pine Island Sound Zone 1 1 2 4.1.2.1.2. 1 1. 2. Figure 28. Box-and-whisker plots of water quality in RB-PIS by survey.

2 1 1 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 199 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 26 6... 4. 4. 3. 3. 2. 2. 1. 1.. 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 199 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 26 Figure 29. Reversal of decline in Eastern Bay in 26 as related to algal bloom event. Year

Table 1. Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Alkaline Biscayne Bay.127 8.844 7 Phosphatase Florida Bay.18 26 3.394 84 Activity Rookery Bay 42 23.168 87 (μm h -1 ) SW Shelf 41 29 66 49 Ten Thousand Is. 1 9 1.969 78 Whitewater Bay 1.121 43 3.68 66 Chlorophyll a Biscayne Bay.392.12 2.298 7 (μg l -1 ) Florida Bay 1.866 98 117 84 Rookery Bay 3.37.334 7.896 87 SW Shelf 1.4.69 3.63 49 Ten Thousand Is. 2.38 1.113 11.9 78 Whitewater Bay 6.6 2.12 18.93 66 Surface Biscayne Bay 7.76 6.8 9.63 7 Dissolved Florida Bay 8.8.72 1.26 84 Oxygen Rookery Bay 7.82. 1.23 87 (mg l -1 ) SW Shelf 6.2 4.23 7.7 49 Ten Thousand Is. 6.9.28 9. 78 Whitewater Bay 7.38 4.44 12.44 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay 7.91 6.9 9.62 7 Dissolved Florida Bay 8.4.84 1.31 84 Oxygen Rookery Bay 7.83.18 1.91 87 (mg l -1 ) SW Shelf.99.78 6.64 49 Ten Thousand Is. 6.92.23 8.99 78 Whitewater Bay 7.12 3.93 2.71 66 Biscayne Bay 7 2 29 7 () Florida Bay 16 4.17 84 Rookery Bay 12 2.128 87 SW Shelf 6 2 1 49 Ten Thousand Is. 17 6 78 Whitewater Bay 2 1.11 66 NH 4 +

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Biscayne Bay 1 7 () Florida Bay 1 1 84 Rookery Bay 1 7 87 SW Shelf 1 2 2 49 Ten Thousand Is. 2 2 1 78 Whitewater Bay 2 6 66 NO 2 - Biscayne Bay 1 7 () Florida Bay 9 84 Rookery Bay.17 87 SW Shelf 2 1 12 49 Ten Thousand Is. 11 1 7 78 Whitewater Bay 18 77 66 NO 3 - ph Biscayne Bay 8.16 7.89 8.47 7 Florida Bay 8.19 7.77 8.68 84 Rookery Bay 8.1 7.72 8.19 87 SW Shelf 7.6 7. 7.71 49 Ten Thousand Is. 7.9 7.6 8.27 78 Whitewater Bay 7.97 7.3 8.88 66 Surface Biscayne Bay..93 38.2 7 Florida Bay 31.8 14.9 37.17 84 Rookery Bay 33.83 18.9.44 87 SW Shelf 32.87 31.1.43 49 Ten Thousand Is. 37 1.67.8 78 Whitewater Bay 14.72.98 31.1 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay.6.79 38.2 7 Florida Bay 31.71 14.9 36.21 84 Rookery Bay 33.88 23.1.4 87 SW Shelf 34.72 31.71.32 49 Ten Thousand Is..12 1.8.89 78 Whitewater Bay 14.73 1.34 31.79 66 Si(OH) 4 Biscayne Bay 19 3.277 () Florida Bay.36 12 1.336 28 Rookery Bay.9 7 1.461 29 SW Shelf 3 1 1.9 49 Ten Thousand Is. 1.768.667 2.446 26 Whitewater Bay 1.92 1.7 2.989 22

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Soluble Biscayne Bay 1 7 Reactive Florida Bay 1 1 7 84 Phosphorus Rookery Bay 7 1 87 () SW Shelf 1 4 49 Ten Thousand Is. 11 29 78 Whitewater Bay 2 3 9 66 Surface Biscayne Bay 21.1 19.27.28 7 Temperature Florida Bay 19.81 13.3 24.46 84 ( o C) Rookery Bay 19.2 17.24 26.9 87 SW Shelf 19.3 17.93 21.19 49 Ten Thousand Is. 21.6 2.6 24.6 78 Whitewater Bay.44 22.88 28.7 66 Bottom Biscayne Bay 21.6 19.26.42 7 Temperature Florida Bay 19.79 13.18 24.47 84 ( o C) Rookery Bay 18.91 17.14.96 87 SW Shelf 19.38 18. 2.36 49 Ten Thousand Is. 21.41 2.61 24.64 78 Whitewater Bay 24.89 21.92 27.9 66 Total Biscayne Bay.173.439 7 Nitrogen Florida Bay.388 74 1.34 84 () Rookery Bay.182.119. 87 SW Shelf 3 77.27 49 Ten Thousand Is..6 1.66 78 Whitewater Bay.364.176.721 66 Total Biscayne Bay 2.369 1.333 7.1 7 Organic Florida Bay 8.171 2.796 1.96 84 Carbon Rookery Bay 3.364 2.19 8.831 87 () SW Shelf 2. 1.863 3.86 49 Ten Thousand Is. 6.49 3.7 1.8 78 Whitewater Bay 13.4.23.84 66 Total Biscayne Bay.16.7 7 Organic Florida Bay.32 66.968 84 Nitrogen Rookery Bay.16 87.389 87 () SW Shelf 93 7.2 49 Ten Thousand Is..223 92.19 78 Whitewater Bay.31.126.664 66

Parameter Zone Median Min. Max. n Total Biscayne Bay 6 4 12 7 Phosphorus Florida Bay 17 7 84 () Rookery Bay 37 14 87 87 SW Shelf 1 8 12 49 Ten Thousand Is. 36 18 6 78 Whitewater Bay 11 88 66 Turbidity Biscayne Bay.93 8 16.4 7 (NTU) Florida Bay 7.27.27 7.9 84 Rookery Bay 4.88.43.76 87 SW Shelf 3.7 1. 6.4 49 Ten Thousand Is..99.74 13.47 78 Whitewater Bay 6.69 2.9 48. 66