CONSULTATION PROCESS AND FEEDBACK - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Similar documents
Community Rail Partnership Action Plan The Bishop Line Survey of Rail Users and Non-Users August 2011 Report of Findings

PASSENGER TRANSPORT. Welcome CONTENTS:

M621 Junctions 1 to 7 Improvement Scheme Public Consultation Report

Southsea Flooding and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Scheme

A Master Plan is one of the most important documents that can be prepared by an Airport.

DONCASTER Bus Map. From 01 September travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp

Barnsley & Doncaster Christmas & New Year 2018/2019 Bus & Train Services

DONCASTER Bus Map. From 29 April travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

INTEGRATED TRANSPORT AUTHORITY

additional exhibition events were held. Wednesday 10th June Ravenglass, Muncaster Parish Hall Tuesday 2nd June Cleator Moor, Civic Centre

Doncaster Town Centre Parking Strategy

Contents. 1. Introduction Proposed Development Consultation Strategy Analysis of Responses Conclusion..

Statement of Community Consultation. Trans Pennine Upgrade: Statement of Community Consultation (SoCC)

TAKING THE NORTH FURTHER

Transport Focus Informed Traveller monitoring initial findings, 9 March April- 13 April

Smarter Travel Sutton

How to read this timetable

2017 SPONSORSHIP PROPOSAL

Lorg Wind Farm. Addendum To Pre-Application Consultation Report

Transport Delivery Committee. Monday 9 October 2017 at 1.00 pm. Minutes

Tourism 201 CHAPTER 10

Proposal for gypsy and traveller accommodation on land at Lower Hollow Copse (Pot Common), Copthorne. Statement of Community Involvement

Letter of invitation for Tender. Ref. No.: T

Attachment 2 to Report Better Bus Services for Kāpiti Consultation Report

No 1 Welcome and Apologies The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting and apologies were read out.

North Shore Area Transit Plan

Argyll & the Isles Tourism Cooperative Growth Fund Case Study. Wild About Argyll

Hertfordshire Business Barometer September 2018

F I N A L R E P O R T. Prepared for. MetroWest Phase 2. May CH2M Burderop Park Swindon Wilts SN4 0QD

Investing in Greater Manchester transport 2017/2018

National Station Improvement Programme. Halifax Station - Final report

EXECUTIVE TEAM MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD AT 3.00PM ON 8 TH APRIL 2013 AT HAILSHAM GRANGE, VICARAGE ROAD, HAILSHAM

Fringe Club and Corner 2016 Feedback on an event licence application for the Park Lands

public transport info

Inv Ref Supplier Date Paid Description Location Gross Amount T Tech and Print Solutions Ltd 18-Feb-15 Hardware - End User Information

Smart Motorways Programme

Rail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise

Service user feedback on access to hospitals within Lancashire

July 2016 Briefing pack: David Higgins South Yorkshire Report

Transport Focus 2016 Bus Passenger Survey Briefing 22 March Liverpool

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

New free City connector bus service

Community Engagement Policy

December 2018 timetable consultation outcome report

Customer Compensation Code

M25 J25 Improvement Scheme Report on Public Consultation June 2017

DRAFT. NHS Lanarkshire Board. Communications Strategy

opyright East Riding of Yorkshire Cou

Manchester Arena Accessibility Guide

A30 Chiverton to Carland Cross Statement of Community Consultation

Cruise tourism in Akaroa: Visitor experiences, business stakeholder perceptions, and community attitudes Michael Shone & Jude Wilson 31 July 2013

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

Chesterfield Champions Events in 2018 Thursday 19th April: Champions Breakfast Tourism and Visitor Economy

1.1. The purpose of this report is to seek approval for the adoption and publication of the Sports Pitches Strategy for East Dunbartonshire.

In your area. Pinxton to Newton and Huthwaite LA08. June Introduction

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

Train times. northernrailway.co.uk. Nottingham to Sheffield and Leeds. 15 May 10 December Leeds. Wakefield Kirkgate. Barnsley Interchange

Your Transport Levy Your Transport Future. Sunshine Coast Council Transport Levy Annual Report

Buy before you board Ways to buy your ticket Train times

Creating Content for Travellers.

Planning Act The Network Rail (Western Rail Link to Heathrow) Order. Statement of Community Consultation

Inv Ref Supplier Date Paid Description Location Gross Amount T Sheffield MDC 06-May-15 Non SYPTE Infrastructure Project Development 33,563.

EXHIBIT LIST. No Exhibit Name Page. 1 R391 HS2 Residents Charter.pdf (R391) R392 Response to Select Committee

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

ecommerce in Independent Hotels 2012 Report

Travel Demand Management & Festive Travel

Hertfordshire Business Barometer April 2018

Proposals for the Harrogate Road / New Line Junction Improvement Scheme. August / September Supported by:

Draft Nature Based Recreation Plan Community Consultation Report

In your area. Stonebroom to Clay Cross LA09. June Introduction

Presentation to BRT UK Technical Visit to Leigh to Ellenbrook Guided Busway

Member-led Review of Cycling Infrastructure

A Quality Partnership Scheme is a statutory agreement between parties to provide improved bus infrastructure and services.

FEDERATION SQUARE MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA CORPORATE PLAN

Communication and consultation protocol

Hertfordshire Business Barometer July 2018

Heritage Line Community Rail Partnership Darlington to Bishop Auckland Railway Line Survey of Users and Non-Users January to March 2010

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Pride of Place Project Volunteer information pack and application form

In your area. South Kirkby to Sharlston Common LA14. June Introduction

Engagement Summary Report. Trans-Canada Highway 1 RW Bruhn Bridge Replacement Project. Community Engagement November 15, 2016 to January 15, 2017

LCR Railway Improvement Plan BID Travel and Transport Forum. Tuesday 28 th February 2017

Parish Councils Briefing October 2013

Submission to Infrastructure Victoria s Draft 30-Year Infrastructure Strategy

in Southwark: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY a survey and report

National Station Improvement Programme. Uckfield Station Final report

In your area. Stourton to Hunslet LA17. June Introduction. High Speed Two (HS2) is

Junction 9 Improvement Scheme

Settlement Profiles. Local Plan Evidence Base.

Accessibility Open Day

Local public consultation

Engagement Summary Report. Trans-Canada Highway 1 RW Bruhn Bridge and Approaches Project Community Engagement February 1 18, 2018.

2013 Business & Legislative Session Visitor Satisfaction Survey Results

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE PETITION PE This paper invites the Committee to consider for the third time the following Petition:

Train times. York to Selby and Hull and York to Sheffield via Pontefract Baghill. 21 May 9 December northernrailway.co.uk.

1. Please tell us about new features, functions or information that you made available on the new website for the first time?

Transport Delivery Committee

Train Stations are not just arrival and departure locations

Transcription:

CONSULTATION PROCESS AND FEEDBACK - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This executive summary presents a brief overview of the public and stakeholder consultation on proposals to optimise the Doncaster bus network, undertaken by South Yorkshire Passenger transport executive (SYPTE) on behalf of the proposed Doncaster Bus Partnership (DBP). 1. Context and Purpose of Consultation Sheffield City Region s Devolution Deal aims to deliver an efficient and integrated bus network that: is co-ordinated, for better delivery of limited resource; minimises congestion and pollution by avoiding excess duplication; is efficient, more sustainable to both Operators and the taxpayer; has improved performance (reliability & punctuality); is integrated, providing better access to other services; allows buses to be reinvested to improve access or reduce fares; supports long term economic growth and helps reduce worklessness; and encourages future modal shift to support patronage growth. Public and stakeholder views have been sought on network plans developed by Doncaster Bus Partnership to meet this objective. 2. The Consultation The Doncaster Bus Partnership network consultation was undertaken by SYPTE on behalf of the proposed DBP from 9 November 18 December 2015. The consultation focused on three primary areas in order to understand individual or group travel needs and how the proposals would impact on their bus journey About You, Your Travel, Your Ticket. People could take part in the consultation online at travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp, by completing a paper feedback form available from Doncaster, Barnsley, Adwick, Rotherham, Meadowhall and Sheffield Interchanges and Doncaster Council s Civic Office reception or by attending any of the consultation drop-in sessions held across Doncaster. 3. Consultation methodology The consultation reached an audience over 85,000. The following section lists activities undertaken as part of the consultation process. Online The consultation was hosted on a dedicated webpage on the Travel South Yorkshire (TSY) website (travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp). A coming soon news story and banner on the TSY website raised awareness of the consultation before it started between 29 October and 8 November. A take part now news story and banner publicised the consultation when it was live, 9 November 18 December. A direct link to the consultation webpage was supplied on all forms of communication. The travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp page received 5353 views, 3968 visits and 3505 visitors between 9 November and 18 December.

The consultation was also promoted via a banner on operator websites. Paper copies Paper copies of the consultation questionnaire and Doncaster Network Map and Guide were available from the Customer Service Desks at Doncaster, Barnsley, Adwick, Rotherham, Meadowhall and Sheffield Interchanges and Doncaster Council s Civic Office reception, and at the consultation drop-in events. 10,000 copies of the Network Maps were produced and distributed as required. People could contact Traveline or e-mail the dedicated consultation e-mail address doncasterbuspartnership@sypte.co.uk if they had any questions or if they required information in an alternative format Drop-in events Fourteen drop-in consultation events staffed by DBP representatives were held at Doncaster Interchange and community venues across Doncaster between 23 November and 10 December. The drop-in events provided people with the opportunity to ask questions about the consultation, receive assistance in completing the consultation questionnaire, or take away information in paper format. Venue Date Time Victoria Hall, DN7 23 November 3 6pm Doncaster Interchange, DN1 24 November 3 6pm Askern Community Library, DN6 25 November 11am 2pm Doncaster Interchange, DN1 26 November 8 10.30am Bentley Area Community Library, DN5 26 November 3 6pm The Ivanhoe Centre, DN12 27 November 3 6pm Thorne Library, DN8 30 November 10am 1pm Intake Community Centre, DN2 30 November 3.30 6.30pm Carcroft and Skellow Community welfare Association, DN6 01 December 3 6pm Dunsville Community Centre, DN7 04 December 3 6pm Balby Community Centre, DN4 07 December 2 5pm Armthorpe Community Centre, DN3 08 December 3 6pm Doncaster Council Building, DN1 09 December 2 5pm Rossington Miners Welfare, DN11 10 December 3 6pm Media Two news releases were issued regarding the consultation on 9 November and 9 December. Extensive print coverage in local newspapers, including Doncaster Free Post whichhad an article reach of 123,460 people and an Advertising Value Equivalency (AVE) of 3,037. Social media TSY Twitter and Facebook accounts were used throughout the consultation to promote participation. 55 Tweets signposting to the consultation from the @TravelSYorks Twitter account were seen by 39,843 people (referred to as Tweet impressions ), 30 people engaged with the Tweets (@ retweet or favourite), allowing the Tweets to be viewed by a further 75,062 people. 124 clicked through to the consultation webpage (travelsouthyorkshire.com/dbp). Seventeen TSY Facebook posts promoting the consultation reached 12,562 people and achieved 510 clicks.

E-marketing A dedicated TSY e-mail newsletter regarding the consultation was delivered to 5582 contacts via SYPTE s customer relationship management (CRM) system on 13 November and had an open rate of 2914 (27%) and a click through rate of 385 (5%), achieving above average e-mail marketing standards. An additional e-mail went to 893 contacts registered for timetable updates in Doncaster on 1 December and had an open rate of 407 (24%) and a click through rate of 168 (11.98%). A reminder e-mail was also sent to 5954 contacts via the CRM system on 11 December and had an open rate of 1770 (18%) and a click through rate of 147 (2%). Doncaster Chamber of Commerce also included a news article with a link to the consultation in one of their December e-newsletter reaching an audience of 2,800 people and had an open rate of 23% and a click through rate of 2%. Posters Posters were displayed in Doncaster Interchange, on board First, Stagecoach and Arriva services operating in Doncaster and at each drop-in venue. Posters were designed to encourage people to take part in the consultation via the Travel South Yorkshire website, by completing a paper questionnaire or by attending a drop-in event and denoted details of each drop in event. Passenger Information Displays Real Time Information displays at bus stops/shelters across Doncaster displayed a message encouraging people to take part in the consultation. Additionally the consultation was promoted on the screens at Doncaster Civic Building throughout the consultation. Disability groups 46 e-mails or letters were sent out to a variety of disability groups across Doncaster, including Doncaster and District Deaf Society and Doncaster Disabled People s Alliance. The letter asked the groups to share the consultation with their members, encouraged them to take part and advised them to contact doncasterbuspartnership@sypte.co.uk if they wished to receive any paper copies of the feedback form to share with their members. Community groups 77 e-mails and letters were sent to various community groups, and touch points across Doncaster, including, Age UK, Job Centre Plus, Doncaster College, Doncaster Federation of Tenants and Residents Association (TARA). Contacts within the local authority were also asked to promote the consultation through their community links. A number of these groups included people with protected characteristics such as Age. Posters and consultation packs were also posted out to libraries in Doncaster asking them to help us publicise the consultation by displaying the information included in the consultation packs.

Transport user groups 53 e-mails and letters were sent to two transport User Groups (Doncaster and South Yorkshire Transport User Groups). The members of these groups represent various community groups and disabled, young and older people. Transport User Groups were asked to respond to the consultation and to help promote it within the wider community. MPs, Councillors and Parish Councillors 97 e-mails or letters were sent to all Doncaster MPs, Councillors and Parish Councillors asking them to take part and to encourage their constituents or Parish members to give their views. A members briefing session was also held in Council Chambers on Tuesday 3 November and councillors were invited to drop in at any time during the session to ask questions and discuss the proposed changes with the South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive (SYPTE) and bus operator representatives in attendance. 4. The respondents A total of 801 respondents took part in the Doncaster Bus Partnership network consultation, including 789 responses from individuals/households/families and 12 responses from groups/organisations. 467 of the overall submissions were via the online survey and 334 in paper format. One petition was also received. Petitions Service Reason Lead petitioner Signatures 67 Restore service 67 between Pru Winder 260 Hatfield and Doncaster Postcodes where the highest volume of responses came from are DN5 (33%) and DN4 (21.2%). The other postcode areas were stated by less than 6% of respondents. 4.9% of respondents did not state their postcode. The majority of respondents belonged to the 65-74 age group (24.2%), followed closely by the 75+ age group (20.1%) with 14.4% in the 45-54 age group. Age Not 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-59 60-64 65-74 75+ Category Stated Respondents 2.0% 6.9% 6.0% 9.7% 14.4% 7.4% 9.4% 24.2% 20.1% 438 (54.7%) of respondents indicated they were female and 334 (41.7%) male. 254 (31.7%) of the 801 respondents said they considered themselves to be disabled. A total of 370 disability types were stated as some respondents stated they have more than one disability condition. 168 respondents (66.1%) stated they had mobility related issues. Disability/health condition Respondents % Mobility related 168 45.4% Hearing related 53 14.3% Hidden disability 53 14.3% Visual related 34 9.2%

Other 27 7.3% Learning disability 12 3.2% Prefer not to say 11 3.0% Mental health service user 9 2.4% Speech/language impediment 3 0.8% Total 370 The data provided in the About You section of the consultation allows us to make sure responses received are broadly representative of the wider population and helps us understand specific needs in more detail. This is a slightly higher percentage of respondents than the 25.3% of public transport users that indicated in the SYPTE s Have Your Say consultation (4 September 4 October 2015) that they have a disability. The Have Your Say consultation is open to members of the public in South Yorkshire and is designed to be representative of the South Yorkshire population. 5. Summary of consultation responses The consultation asked respondents to tell us about how they currently travel, what they thought about any proposed changes to their bus service, and asked about the type of ticket they currently use. 5.1 Your travel The Your Travel section of the consultation asked respondents about how they currently travel and what they thought about any proposed changes to their bus service. The majority of respondents (89.6%) told us that they currently use the bus and 7.4% said they did not and 3% did not state. The main reason that would make respondents use the bus more was more frequent buses (34.2%), followed closely by a more reliable service (33.2%). Cheaper tickets were an incentive for 15.2% of respondents. However, as the majority of respondents (49%) indicated they currently use a senior/disabled pass to travel, a cheaper ticket may not be an incentive for improved travel. Q. What would make you use the bus more? Respondents More frequent buses 440 (34.2%) More reliable service 427 (33.2%) Better connections 225 (17.5%) Cheaper tickets 195 (15.2%) Total responses (multiple answers allowed) 1,287 Respondents were asked how often they would use their bus service on the proposed new network and what they would use if for. 985 responses were received as each respondent could comment on up to three services. 355 (36%) use the bus 3-4 days a week, 354 (35%) use the bus 5 or more days per week, 196 (19.9%) 1-2 days a week, 35 (3.6%) once a fortnight, 33 (3.4%) less than once a month and 21 (2.1%) once a month. 200 respondents (25%) would use the service for Shopping and 136 (17%) would use the service for social/leisure, whilst work, personal business, visiting friends/relatives and going to the Hospital/Doctors is similarly distributed between 12% and 15%. Education was the main journey purpose of only 3% of respondents. Q. For what purpose(s) would you use this Respondents (%)

service? Shopping 25% Social/leisure 17% Hospital/Doctors 15% Visiting friends/relatives 15% Personal business (e.g. bank) 13% Work 12% Education 3% The consultation wanted to understand how the respondents thought the proposed changes would impact on their bus journey. 418 (44%) of respondents said their journey will be made much worse. 179 of these respondents are over the age of 65. 223 (23%) said the change will not have an impact on them 49.7% of these are in the age groups 35-64), whilst 132 (14%) said it will improve a lot (with 50% of these being aged between 65 and 75+. The most commented upon service on the proposed network is 41/42 (115 comments). This was followed by service 57 (65 comments), 49 (64 comments) 222/220/X20/221 (64 comments). The majority of comments received for each of these services were regarding the negative impact the proposed changes would have on their journey. Q. How will the proposed changes impact your journey? Respondents (%) Make much worse 44% Neither 23% Improve a lot 14% Make a bit worse 14% Improve a little 5.3% 5.2 Your ticket The Your Ticket section of the consultation wanted to understand travel patterns, the type of ticket people currently use and whether they would pay more for a multi-operator ticket. When respondents were asked how often they travel using different bus operators 37.5% (300) answered frequently, 37.3% (299) said infrequently, 15.7% (126) stated never and the remaining 9.5% (76) did not state. When asked about the type of ticket they use to travel 395 (49%) of the 801 respondents indicated Elderly/Disabled pass. 221 (28%) people use tickets valid for a single bus operator, 41 (5.1%) use multi modal (valid on bus and train) and 32 (4%) use a ticket valid for any bus operator. First are the main bus operator in Doncaster, therefore the utilisation of multi-operator tickets will be lower than in other areas of South Yorkshire. 48% (145) of people who use different operators frequently are in the 65-74 and 75+ age categories, having flexibility of the free travel across all bus operators within the validation period. 78.7% (311) of respondents who use an Elderly/Disabled pass also belong to these two age groups. Concessionary pass holders would only have to purchase operator tickets outside of the pass validation period, likely to be in an infrequent manner. The majority of their travel will mainly be in the free period; similarly students can also take advantage of the concessionary fares available for them. Use of tickets valid for one bus operator is highest in age group 45-54, being used across all age groups between 16 and 64. This reflects their journey purpose being mainly to work and education. These age groups will be fare paying passengers purchasing operators commercial tickets.

Q. Which ticket do you currently use to travel? Respondents Elderly/disabled 395 (49%) Ticket valid for a single bus operator 221 (28%) Multi modal (valid on bus and train) 41 (5.1%) Ticket valid for any bus operator 32 (4%) Respondents that indicated they currently use a ticket valid for a single bus operator were asked why they buy this type of ticket and how much more they would be willing to pay for a multi-operator ticket. Of the 211 respondents currently using single operator tickets 67% stated they purchased a single operator ticket as only one operator works on the route they use. 14% indicated that they have a choice of operator but choose their ticket based on services or performance and 13% stated it is better value for money. With regards to the question of how much more respondents would be willing to pay for a multi-operator ticket, as expected the majority 142 (64%) said they would pay nothing, 52 (23%) were willing to pay 5% more and 19 (9%) would pay 10% more. The high percentage (64%) of respondents that indicated they would not be prepared to pay more for a multi-operator ticket is expected given the majority of respondents (67%) stated that their main reason for buying a single operator ticket was that there is only one operator on the route they use. Q. How much more would you be willing to pay for a Respondents multi-operator ticket allowing you to use all buses? Nothing 142 (64%) 5% more 52 (23%) 10% more 19 (9%) Not stated 8 (4%) Total 221 6. Next steps The feedback from the proposed DBP network consultation has been used to inform bus service changes, the details of these are given in the main report. Lessons Learnt SYPTE will reflect on the feedback received on the consultation process used to ensure, as far as practicable, lessons learnt from this exercise are incorporated in to proposals for future similar exercises. This Executive Summary is part of the report which informs the Transport Committee of the findings of the consultation.