Busan Current Status
Contents Contents 1. Current Status of Busan Port 2. Busan New Port Development Project 3. Distripark Development Project 4. Busan North Port Redevelopment Project
1 Current Status of Busan Port
Current Status of Busan Port History of Busan Port 1876 1940 1970 21st Century 1950 s 1970 s Present
Current Status of Busan Port Busan Port North Port(Old Port) New Port 25km 5
Current Status of Busan Port Busan Port (Old Port, north port)
Current Status of Busan Port Busan Port (New Port)
Current Status of Busan Port North Port & New Port New Port 5 CNTR Terminal Operators 12m TEU Capacity 23 berths North Port 4 CNTR Terminal Operators 8m TEU Capacity 20 berths 8
Current Status of Busan Port Busan Port T/put (2009~2014) 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 Total Local T/S 17,686 17,046 16,185 14,194 11,980 6,569 5,372 (44.8%) 7,836 6,276 (44.2%) 8,832 8,898 7,353 8,148 (45.4%) (47.8%) 8,938 8,748 (49.5%) (Unit : 000 TEU) 18,652 9,238 9,414 (50.5%) 2,000 0 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14
Current Status of Busan Port Domestic CNTR Market Share in 2014 Total T/put in Korea : 24.73million TEU Pyungtaek (2.2%) Ulsan (1.6%) Pohang (0.4%) Others (1.4%) (Unit : 000 TEU) Incheon (9.4%) Gwangyang (9.4%) BUSAN 18,652 (75.4%) Busan Share 2010 (73%) 2014 (75.4%)
Current Status of Busan Port Domestic Market Share (Local vs T/S) Import&Export Ulsan 2.6% Gwangyang 12.5% Pyungtaek 3.7% Others 1.8% Incheon 15.9% BUSAN 63.4% Gwangyang 5.2% Incheon 0.2% Transshipment Others 0.1% BUSAN 94.3%
Current Status of Busan Port World s Top 10 Container Ports 7 out of 10 world s busiest ports are in N.E. ASIA (Unit : million TEU) No. Port Country 2013 2014 1 Shanghai China 33.62 35.28 2 Singapore Singapore 32.58 33.87 3 Shenzhen China 23.28 24.04 4 Hong Kong China 22.35 22.28 5 Ningbo-zhoushan China 17.33 19.45 6 Busan South Korea 17.68 18.65 7 Qingdao China 15.66 16.70 8 Guangzhou China 15.32 15.69 9 Jebel Ali UAE 13.64 15.20 10 LA/LB USA 14.60 15.16 source : Port Authority Websites, Alphaliner (2014) Qingdao, Guangzhou, Jebel Ali = estimation
Current Status of Busan Port World s top 10 Container Ports 1 1985 1990 1995 2000 2002 2004 2008 2010 2012 2013 2014 Rotterdam Singapore Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong Singapore Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai (2,655) (5,224) (12,550) (18,090) (19,144) (21,932) (29,918) (29,069) (32,529) (33,617) (35,285) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NY/NJ Hong Kong Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Shanghai Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore (2,367) (5,101) (11,830) (17,090) (16,941) (21,329) (27,980) (28,431) (31,649) (32,579) (33,868) Hong Kong Rotterdam Kaohsiung Busan Busan Shanghai Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong Shenzhen Shenzhen (2,289) (3,667) (5,232) (7,540) (9,453) (14,557) (24,248) (23,532) (23,097) (23,278) (24,030) Kobe Kaohsiung Rotterdam Kaohsiung Shanghai Shenzhen Shenzhen Shenzhen Shenzhen Hong Kong Hong Kong (1,519) (3,495) (4,787) (7,426) (8,620) (13,650) (21,400) (22,509) (22,941) (22,288) (22,270) Antwerp Kobe Busan Rotterdam Kaohsiung Busan Busan Busan Busan Busan Ningbo (1,350) (2,596) (4,503) (6,274) (8,493) (11,492) (13,453) (14,194) (17,041) (17,686) (19,450) Yokohama LA Hamburg Shanghai Shenzhen Kaohsiung Dubai Ningbo Ningbo Ningbo Busan (1,327) (2,587) (2,890) (5,613) (7,614) (9,710) (12,000) (13,144) (16,830) (17,327) (18,652) Hamburg Busan LongBeach LA Rotterdam Rotterdam Ningbo Guangzhou Guangzhou Qingdao Qingdao (1,159) (2,348) (2,844) (4,879) (6,506) (8,300) (11,226) (12,550) (14,743) (15,520) (16,624) Keelung Hamburg Yokohama LongBeach LA LA Guangzhou Qingdao Qingdao Guangzhou Guangzhou (1,158) (1,969) (2,757) (4,601) (6,106) (7,321) (11,001) (12,012) (14,500) (15,309) (16,160) Busan NY/NJ LA Hamburg Hamburg Hamburg Rotterdam Dubai Dubai Dubai Dubai (1,148) (1,872) (2,555) (4,248) (5,374) (7,003) (10,830) (11,600) (13,265) (13,641) (15,249) LongBeach Keelung Antwerp Antwerp Antwerp Dubai Qingdao Rotterdam Tianjin Tianjin Tianjin (1,141) (1,828) (2,329) (4,082) (4,777) (6,429) (10,320) (11,146) (12,295) (13,000) (14,050)
Europe Top-5 Container Ports (1970~2013) 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Rotterdam (242) Rotterdam (1,901) Rotterdam (3,666) Rotterdam (6,280) Rotterdam (11,146) Rotterdam (11,621) Antwerp (215) Hamburg (783) Hamburg (1,969) Hamburg (4,248) Antwerp (8,468) Hamburg (9,302) Belfast (210) Antwerp (724) Antwerp (1,549) Antwerp (4,082) Hamburg (7,900) Antwerp (8,578) Bremerhaven (195) Bremerhaven (702) Felixstowe (1,417) Felixstowe (2,853) Bremerhaven (4,536) Bremerhaven (5,830) Tilbury (155) Le Havre (507) Bremen/Bremer haven (1,198) Bremen/Bremer haven (2,752) Valencia (3,654) Algeciras (4,500) ( ) : 000 TEU Source : Containerisation International
Asia Top-5 Container Ports (1970~2013) 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013 Kobe (90) Hong Kong (1,465) Singapore (5,223) Hong Kong (18,098) Shanghai (29,069) Shanghai (33,617) Tokyo (54) Kaohsiung (979) Hong Kong (5,100) Singapore (17,087) Singapore (28,431) Singapore (32,240) Nagoya (44) Singapore (917) Kaohsiung (24,384) Singapore(PSA) (17,040) Hong Kong (23,532) Shenzhen (23,278) Hong Kong (35) Kobe (727) Kobe (3,495) Busan (7,540) Shenzhen (22,509) Hong Kong (22,352) Osaka (30) Yokohama (722) Busan (2,596) Kaohsiung (7,426) Busan (14,157) Busan (17,686) ( ) : 000 TEU Source : Containerisation International
Current Status of Busan Port Container Volume Forecast Rising Portion in N.E. ASIA expected (Unit : 000 TEU) 900,000 800,000 700,000 616,234 646,789 686,596 730,817 778,431 829,377 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 243,374 (38.4% ) 259,600 (38.8%) 279,456 (39.5%) 301,242 (40.1%) 324,120 (41.6%) 348,696 (42.0%) N.E.Asia Ser Ser World 100,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 * Source : Drewry Maritime Research
Capacity deployed on intra-far East routes 2.5 Million TEU 2.0 4,000-5,099TEU 3,000-3,999TEU 1.5 2,000-2,999TEU 1.0 1,000-1,999TEU 0.5 100-999TEU 0.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source : Alphaliner Weekly Newsletter Volume 2015 Issue 21
South East Asian Top 15 Ports 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 000 TEU Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang Port Klang Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Tanjung Pelepas Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok Jawaharlal Nehru Jawaharlal Nehru Tanjung Priok Laem Chabang Laem Chabang Tanjung Priok Tanjung Priok Ho Chi Minh Ho Chi Minh Ho Chi Minh Ho Chi Minh Colombo Colombo Jawaharlal Nehru Colombo Colombo Ho Chi Minh Jawaharlal Nehru Colombo Jawaharlal Nehru Manlia Manlia Manlia Manlia Manlia Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Tanjung Perak Karachi Chennai Chennai Mundra Mundra Bangkok Bangkok Bangkok Chennai Karachi Chennai Karachi Karachi Karachi Chittagong Chittagong Chittagong Chittagong Chittagong Bangkok Mundra Mundra Mundra Bangkok Chennai Source : IAPH Statistics
What will ensure sustainability of port? 1. Location 2. International network 3. Service (Productivity & etc.) 4. Cost
Current Status of Busan Port Competitiveness of Busan Port Location : Between the World s Factory & 3 rd Largest Economy Vladivostok Zarubino Qingdao Hong Kong Source : Alphaliner 35,286 33,869 24,037 22,283 19,450 18,652 16,700 (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2014) Singapore Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong Ningbo Busan Qingdao
Current Status of Busan Port Competitiveness of Busan Port Connectivity(Ocean-going) 368 weekly services Korea Russia : 11 N.America: 57 Europe : 37 Chaina : 43 M.East : 12 Japan : 71 S.America : 33 Africa : 1 S.E. Asia : 85 Oceania : 25 As of the end of 2013
Current Status of Busan Port Competitiveness of Busan Port Connectivity (Feeder Network) 1.5D 2D 9D 1.5D 2D 1D 25 D 33,617 32,579 23,278 22,352 Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong Source : BPA (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) Japan : 60 ports China : 45 ports Russia : 5 ports 17,327 15,520 Ningbo Qingdao
Current Status of Busan Port Competitiveness of Busan Port Stability Free from Natural Influence of Fog, Wind, etc. Well Sheltered Natural Harbor 33,617 32,579 23,278 22,352 Source : BPA (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) Transhipment HUB Port Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong 17,327 15,520 Ningbo Qingdao
Current Status of Busan Port Competitiveness of Busan Port Deep Water Water Depth : 15~16m (17m by 2016) Little Tidal Difference : 1.3m The World s Largest vessels calling at Busan Port 18,270 TEU vessel Maersk MC-Kinney Moller (July 15, 2013) 19,224 TEU vessel MSC Oscar (Jan. 8, 2015) 33,617 32,579 23,278 22,352 Source : BPA (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) 17,327 15,520 Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong Ningbo Qingdao
2 Busan New Port Development Project
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port 5 Container & 1 Multipurpose 23 berth(cntr 21 + Multi 2) Quay Length : 7.5km 12m TEU capacity Period : 1995~2020 Total Budget : USD 16.7 billion 45 berth(cntr 40 + General 5) Quay Length : 14.71km 25m TEU H/Capacity 33,617 32,579 23,278 22,352 Source : BPA (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) 17,327 15,520 Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong Ningbo Qingdao
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port 33,617 32,579 23,278 22,352 Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong Source : BPA (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) The World s Largest Container Vessel MSC Oscar (19,224TEU) Maiden Call at Busan New Port 8 Jan 2015 17,327 15,520 Ningbo Qingdao
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port Development Plan HJNC (4) Phase 2-5 (3) HJNC(4) PNC(6) PNIT(3) Multipurpose TML Phase 2-6 (2) Private Investment BPA Concession Future Plan Source : BPA 33,617 32,579 3 berths, 23,278 Length : 1,050m Capacity 22,352 : 1.8m TEU/year Budget : KRW 6446.6 17,327 billion BTO Development 15,520 4-year Construction(by 2019) 30-year Operation Shanghai Singapore Shenzhen Hong Kong (Unit : 1,000 TEUs, 2013) Ningbo Qingdao
Busan New Port Development Project Accomodating Bigger Vessels To-island Removal Dredging Plan Size : 24,496 m2 Island removed by 2017 15m 17m(2013~2016)
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port in 2020
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port Summary l Strong Industrial Back Ground Synergy Effect by Complex of Logistics Geographic Stability
Busan New Port Development Project Busan New Port Summary ll High-tech New Terminal Competitive Distribution Center Bunker Station Ship Repair dry-dock
3 Distripark Development Project
Distripark Development Project Distripark Development - Northern Distripark Western Distripark Southern Distripark Total Size ( 000 m2 ) Whole 3,074 6,402 1,421 10,896 For Lease 1,704 3,579 1,421 6,704 Period 2001~2011 2006~2020 2006 ~ 2015 Budget (million US$) 470 864 409 1,743 Remark Completed, 30 tenants in operation 28 tenants selected for Phase 1-1 & 1-2 Under Feasibility Study
Distripark Development Project North Distripark Number of Tenant Investment Total Size Cargo Generation (2013) Employment (2013) 30 USD 355.4M 1,704K m2 908K TEU 1,959
Distripark Development Project Business Model Overseas Busan Port Distripark (FTZ) Overseas
Distripark Development Project Functions of Distripark Applicable Business Tax Incentive & Benefits Assembling Packaging Lease Terms and Conditions - Lease Period : Max 50 years - Lease Fee : 29~44cents/ m2 /month Storage Labeling Direct Tax - 100% exemption for first 3 years - 50% exemption for next 2 years Indirect Tax - 100% exemption - Zero VAT
4 Busan North Port Redevelopment Project
Busan North Port Redevelopment Project Project Outline Redevelopment Target Area Size : 1,511,450 m2 Total Budget : USD 8.5 billion Period : 2009~2019 (Infra + Superstructure) HBCT UTC Pier 1 Pier 2 Pier 4 Pier 3 Central Pier DPCT BIT KBCT
Busan North Port Redevelopment Project New International Passenger Terminal Total Budget Period Wharf Terminal Building Est Yearly Passengers 234mUS$ 2011~2015 One 100,000 G/T-Cruiseship Five 20,000 G/T-Passengership Six 500-Speed Ship 5-story Building, 92,826 m2 2.8m
Busan North Port Redevelopment Project Cruise Terminal
Busan North Port Redevelopment Project Busan North Port Redevelopment Area in 2020 BPA Busan Stn. Intnl. Passenger TML
Busan Metropolitan City Beautiful City Busan
Busan Metropolitan City Beautiful City Busan
# Thank you