COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Similar documents
General Issues Committee Item Transit Operating Budget Ten Year Local Transit Strategy

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Transit System Performance Update

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

TRANSIT WINDSOR REPORT

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Implementation Strategy for the Lethbridge Destination Management Organization (LDMO)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

EX28.6 REPORT FOR ACTION. Advancing Fare Integration SUMMARY. Date: October 16, 2017 To: Executive Committee From: City Manager Wards: All

MEDIUM SIZE STADIUM STRATEGY

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

Welcome. Sign in Pick up comment form Visit stations to learn more Submit your comment form

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE

14 YORK REGION TRANSIT (YRT/VIVA) SOUTHWEST DIVISION OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT EXTENSION

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

Memorandum. DATE: May 9, Board of Directors. Jim Derwinski, CEO/Executive Director. Fare Structure Study Fare Pilot Program

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number Mayor and Members of Council Jim Keech, President & CEO, Utilities Kingston

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #FarePolicy

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

2006 Residential Property Taxes and Utility Charges Survey

Driving Ridership Strategic Partnerships

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Public Meeting. December 19 th, 2018

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

REGION OF WATERLOO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MARCH 2017

AGENDA GUEMES ISLAND FERRY OPERATIONS PUBLIC FORUM

2016 Annual Service Plan

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Preliminary Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April and May 2016

Aviation, Rail, & Trucking 6-1

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Business Item Transportation Committee SW Item:

Transit Commission. Tax Supported Programs

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Edmonton Transit System (ETS) AUGUST 2012

CRYSTAL CENTRE COUNCIL UPDATE PRESENTATION

(905) , Extension 2725

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

The Corporation of the City of Kawartha Lakes Council Report

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

RACINE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN:

(This page intentionally left blank.)

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Attachment C: 2017/2018 Halifax Transit Year End Performance Report. 2017/2018 Year End Performance Measures Report

Resort Municipality Initiative Annual Report 2015

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

DIRECTOR, ENVIRONMENT, FLEET, & SOLID WASTE UPDATE: REGIONAL RIDESHARE PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Status Update

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT/ VIVA SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

ETS Park & Ride Report Summer 2017

Board of Directors Information Summary

1.0 BACKGROUND NEW VETERANS CHARTER EVALUATION OBJECTIVES STUDY APPROACH EVALUATION LIMITATIONS... 7

Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust Strategic Plan Update

Minutes of the Third Meeting THE WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

2017 LRT Passenger Count Report

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

SUBJECT: Business Plan Update for Reid Hillview and San Martin Airports

Park Board Chair and Commissioners

DRAFT Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April June 2016

Bristol Virginia Transit

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Presentation on APEC s Ease of Doing Business Interim Assessment

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Greater Portland Transit District

Parkland County Municipal Development Plan Amendment Acheson Industrial Area Structure Plan

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

2017/2018 Q3 Performance Measures Report. Revised March 22, 2018 Average Daily Boardings Comparison Chart, Page 11 Q3 Boardings figures revised

CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN E. PEER REVIEW MOORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. PAGE 263

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Terrace Regional Transit System CITY OF TERRACE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011

(Also known as the Den-Ice Agreements Program) Evaluation & Advisory Services. Transport Canada

Transit Fare Review Phase 2 Discussion Guide

2. RESOLUTION TO CLOSE MEETING

Sustainable Procurement Policy for Heathrow Airport Limited

ETS Park & Ride Report Spring 2017

Rates & Charges Analysis

Passenger Infrastructure Transfer Points Kingston Centre, St. Lawrence College, Gardiners Centre Cataraqui Centre...

Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

Transcription:

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: 6 June 2016 Subject: Boards Routed Through: 2017 Airdrie Transit s Community Services Advisory Board Date: 9 May 2016 Issue: Council is being asked to endorse the 2017 Airdrie Transit user fees as recommended by the Community Services Advisory Board. Background: Council is presented with the Transit report on an annual basis to ensure there is alignment with Council s vision for public transit services in the community and associated user fee for these services. The endorsed Transit user fees provide direction to Administration for the operating budget process. Administration is recommending no changes to Transit user fees for 2017. This is based upon the following three factors are: 1. Comparable user fees of similar sized municipalities As a member of the Canadian Urban Transit Association (CUTA), the City of Airdrie has access to various national reports on transit operating data. These include reports on conventional transit, specialized transit, fleet, crime on public transit and ridership. Each year CUTA compiles data from all member transit properties and produces an annual Canadian Transit Fact Book. Transit administration utilizes the data from this Fact Book for benchmarking, budgeting and performing comparisons such as user fees. CUTA performs further analysis of municipal transit properties by categorizing them into population sub-groups.

2. Council resolution Intercity Express (ICE) recovery rates In 2012, Council made a resolution that the regional Intercity Express service should operate on a cost recovery model of operating costs. The current user fee structure reflects this resolution with Transit administration reviewing the service bi-annually to ensure alignment with Council s resolution. 3. The ability to pay at the local level Airdrie Transit s Local and ACCESS Airdrie services operate without a Council adopted recovery rate. Should the community and Council desire to increase user fees or establish a set recovery rate similar to the ICE service, user fees will undoubtedly have to increase substantially. Increasing user fees to cover a higher portion of operating expenditures may have a negative impact on ridership as the new user fee structure may exceed the public s ability or desire to pay for the current service levels. Transit Revenue Breakdown Airdrie Transit has three primary revenue streams. The first and largest revenue stream (70% of total revenues) is from user fees. User fees include pre-paid (passes and tickets) and cash fares collected from transit customers. The sale of goods and services accounts for approximately 27% of total budgeted revenues. This includes revenues received from Ivanhoe Cambridge and the Town of Crossfield for services provided. Sale of Goods & Services $450,390 Advertising $58,280 2016 Budgeted Revenues s $1,170,530 The third revenue stream is from media space sales (advertising) onboard the transit fleet and via bus benches. The City has contracted the management of media space sales to contracted providers well known within the industry. This revenue accounts for approximately 3% of total budgeted revenues. Transit Philosophy Airdrie Transit has adopted a practice of rewarding multi-time users with a better price point per trip. This structure is designed to incentivize regular usage over single trips. For example, a user traveling two times a day on the local transit service for a month would pay $94.50 in an average month using the current cash user fee. That same user could purchase a $65.00 local transit monthly pass and travel an unlimited number of times in that same month. Two separate user fee categories have been created reflecting Council s resolution for recovery of operating costs of the ICE service. These categories are local transit services and ICE.

Local Transit Services Local services include conventional fixed-route service, demand-responsive Dial-A-Bus, and ACCESS Airdrie paratransit services. These services share one user fee structure for ease of application for both the customer and transit operations. User fees on local transit services were increased for the first time since 2007 in January 2015. The tables below outline the current user fees for Council s endorsed benchmark communities in Alberta. Table 1 - Local Transit (Council endorsed benchmarks) Transit Property Cash Regular Ticket Adult Pass Youth Pass Senior Pass Airdrie $2.25 $2.00 $65.00 $47.50 $47.50 Grande Prairie $2.00 $1.70 $54.00 $43.00 $27.00 Lethbridge $3.00 $2.25 $77.00 $62.00 $28.00 Medicine Hat $3.25 $2.93 $70.50 $38.75 $43.75 Red Deer $2.50 $2.13 $67.00 $59.00 $59.00 St Albert $3.25 $2.45 $72.25 $72.25 $72.25 Average $2.71 $2.24 $67.63 $53.75 $46.25 Table #1 identifies that Airdrie and Grande Prairie share the lowest local user fees for cash and tickets in Alberta. It is also important to note that both Airdrie and Grande Prairie provide the least amount of service per capita when compared to the other communities as per the Canadian Urban Transit Association Canadian Transit Fact Book 2014. Local Transit Services Proposed s Transit administration is proposing no changes to local transit services in 2017. Table 2 Transit Administration s Recommended 2017 Local s Current Transit Proposed Transit % Increase Cash $2.25 $2.25 0% Ticket Booklet (10 tickets) $20.00 $20.00 0% Adult Monthly Pass $65.00 $65.00 0% Student/Senior Monthly Pass $47.50 $47.50 0% Intercity Express (ICE) Service: Route 900 ICE Route 900 launched in September 2015 and operates seven days-a-week between Airdrie, CrossIron Mills Mall and McKnight-Westwinds LRT in northeast Calgary. The user fees for the Route 900 service were endorsed by Council in March 2014 and Transit administration are not proposing changes to the user fees at this time.

Table 3 Transit Administration s Recommended 2017 ICE Route 900 s Current Transit Proposed Transit % Increase Cash (Airdrie to CrossIron) $3.00 $3.00 0% Cash (Airdrie to Calgary) $5.00 $5.00 0% Cash (Calgary to CrossIron) $3.00 $3.00 0% Ticket Booklet (10 tickets) $30.00 $30.00 0% Adult Monthly Pass $99.00 $99.00 0% Student/Senior Monthly Pass $79.00 $79.00 0% Intercity Express (ICE) Service: Routes 901 & 902 The regional ICE service currently operates two routes into downtown Calgary during peak morning and afternoon hours. The service has expanded from three daily trips in 2010 to five daily trips in 2014. The regional ICE service operates on a Council approved principle of cost-recovery on operating costs. This was adopted in 2012 and Transit administration has made adjustments to the ICE user fees to achieve this outcome. Transit administration is proposing user fees on the ICE service remain unchanged for 2017. Table 4 Proposed 2016 ICE (Route 901/902) s Current Transit Proposed Transit % Increase Cash Fare $9.00 $9.00 0% Ticket Booklet (10 tickets) $75.00 $75.00 0% Adult Monthly Pass $200.00 $200.00 0% Student/Senior Monthly Pass $155.00 $155.00 0% Zone-Based s Implemented in late 2015, Transit administration are recommending a continuation of zoned-based user fees. Zoned-based user fees charge customers a higher user fee based on the number of zones they are traveling through to reach their destination. This model is considered an industry best practice, particularly for services that operate intermunicipally. Table 6 highlights the zones and the associated user fees. Table 5 Zoned-Based s Zone Routes Cash 1 Local Transit Services $2.50 2 900 (Airdrie to CrossIron, Calgary to CrossIron) $3.00 3 900 (Airdrie to McKnight) $5.00 4 901, 902 $9.00

Alignment with AirdrieONE: The investment and delivery of public transit services aligns with two key principles of the AirdrieONE Sustainability Plan: Economic Prosperity The City s public transit services provide and enhance labour mobility locally and regionally. Provision of public transit services improves the City s competitiveness as local businesses have the ability to attract and retain workforce. Sustainable Transportation Public transit services are identified as one of the key strategies for improving sustainable transportation outcomes within the AirdrieONE Plan. The goal being to design a system that moves people that improves sustainability, safety and convenience. Airdrie Transit s services have achieved this outcome as evidenced by the growing ridership levels over the past four years. Boards Routed Through: At the May 9, 2016, meeting of the Community Services Advisory Board the Board unanimously endorsed Alternative #1. The Board asked questions regarding the ongoing financial performance of transit services in relation to maintaining the existing transit user fees. Alternatives/Implications: Alternative #1 - Maintain Transit user fees at the current rates. This alternative aligns with Council s resolution for regional services to achieve cost recovery of operating costs and accounts for levels of service for local transit services. Growth in revenues from user fees will be limited to growth in ridership. Transit are anticipating growth in ridership on all service levels in 2017 which will spur an increase in revenues from user fees. When user fees are increased they may have a direct impact on ridership, revenues and future transit usage behaviour. Transit administration believes an annual review of user fees addresses these concerns and allows for incremental increases in user fees to meet Council s desired outcomes. Alternative #2 Implement an Alternative Methodology Adopt alternative user fees based on criteria not currently utilized. This may include a flat percentage increase to a service, for example, a 5% increase to all transit user fees.

Communications Plan: N/A Recommendation: That Council endorses the recommendation of the Community Services Advisory Board to maintain Transit user fees at the current rates for 2017. Chris MacIsaac Transit Coordinator Presenter: Department: Reviewed by: Attachments: Appointment: Chris MacIsaac Transit Michelle Lock; Director of Community Services N/A N/A