II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Similar documents
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS N. AESTHETICS

2.0 Physical Characteristics

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

NOTICE OF INTENT MAPS WITH DESCRIPTIONS

Figure San Dimas Bonita at San Dimas Avenue (view looking west)

COMMENT PERIOD. August 2, 2017 to September 1, 2017 INTRODUCTION

Appendix L Technical Memorandum Aesthetics

Town of Oakfield Agricultural and Farmland Protection Plan

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation December 2, 2004 COYOTE HELLYER COUNTY PARK BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL

Northeast Quadrant Distinctive Features

Roduner Ranch FOR SALE. 5,878± Acres Potential Development Land. Merced County, California. Offices Serving The Central Valley

NAVAJO COMMUNITY PLAN

Blanco Creek Ranch Acres, Uvalde County, Texas

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Map 1.1 Wenatchee Watershed Land Ownership

Pinellas County Environmental Lands

David Magney Environmental Consulting

Site Location and Setting

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN 1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 What is a General Plan?

This section of the Plan provides a general overview of the Smoky Mountain Region. It consists of the following four subsections:

SHASTA WEST PLANNING AREA

NOTICE OF PREPARATION/NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

Classifications, Inventory and Level of Service

DATE: January 19, WCA Governing Board. Johnathan Perisho, Project Manager. Mark Stanley, Executive Officer

ROAD AND TRAIL PROJECT APPROVAL

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma

Airport Planning Area

PUBL DRAFT. MISSION TRAILS REGIONAL PARK 3.7. West Sycamore 3-87

Chatsworth Branch Library Devonshire Street, Chatsworth, CA Thursday, November 16, :00-8:00 pm

Whitemouth Falls Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

Part Three : COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS AND SPECIAL STUDY AREAS SACRAMENTO 2030 GENERAL PLAN. Introduction

(Short Listing) DUPUYER ACREAGE, ROCKY MOUNTAN FRONT

Stevenson Ranch Library The Old Road, Stevenson Ranch, CA Thursday, November 9, :00-8:00 pm

Table 1: Margarita (SDSU) Communication Site. Latitude 1 Longitude 1 Elev 2 Address T/R/S 3 APN 4 USGS Quadrangle

The Recreational Trail along Cushing Park road has been a successful addition to the city

Southwest Quadrant Distinctive Features

THE OLSEN RANCH. Paso Robles, California 600+ UNIT PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY. << Click to View Aerial Tour >>

April 10, Mark Stiles San Juan Public Lands Center Manager 15 Burnett Court Durango, CO Dear Mark,

Marchand Provincial Park. Management Plan

Proposed Arthurs Point Special Housing Area. Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act Expression of Interest

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REPORT PURPOSE EXISTING SETTING EXPANDING PARKLAND

Trail Phasing Plan. Note: Trails in the Clear Creek Canyon area (Segments will be finalized in the future to minimize wildlife impacts

ROUTE ANALYSIS PROCESS

Unincorporated Acton/ Uninc. South Antelope Valley STUDY AREA PROFILE

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

Brinker Creek Ranch. Colorado - Routt County - Yampa

Wool Ranch 20 Acres 20 +/- acres Sunol, CA Alameda County

Double Bar Z Ranch 8,690 ± California. Mariposa County Exclusive Agents Allen Alsobrook Jim Watson. Sierra Foothills. La Grange

Treasure Island Supplemental Information Report Addendum

TRAFALGAR PARK. 78: p.140 W 99th St FLAT ROCK CREEK PARK. W 103rd St OVERLAND PARK. Quivira Rd. College Blvd. Shared use path. Mountain bike trail

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Plan Consistency Review: Old Town Village Mixed Use Project City of Goleta. MEETING DATE: June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 5M

El Dorado County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Community Tab for AUBURN LAKE TRAILS FIRE SAFE COUNCIL ACTIVITIES

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

2. Goals and Policies. The following are the adopted Parks and Trails Goals for Stillwater Township:

3.13 RECREATION Introduction Environmental Setting. Regional Characteristics. Orange County

Our Mission. Discover the many states of California. Chino Hills State Park 1879 Jackson Street Riverside, Ca (951)

Subject to sale, withdrawal, or error.

Table 1: Santiago Peak Communication Site. Latitude 1 Longitude 1 Elev 2 Address T/R/S 3 APN 4 USGS Quadrangle

RETAIL & RESTAURANT SPACE AVAILABLE NOW

CHAPTER 6 NOISE EXPOSURE

BUCK POINT RANCH. Aspen Associates Realty

Santa Cruz North Interior

SOUTH INTERCHANGE AREA

Section 5.16 Parks and Recreation Facilities

LAS VARAS RANCH CA COASTAL TRAIL PROPOSED ALIGNMENT

at EAST HILLS r e s t a u r a n t s t h e a t e r s h o p p i n g l i f e s t y l e c o m m u n i t y FEATURES

County of Riverside - PSEC Project General Habitat Assessment Appendix A

URBAN DESIGN REPORT. Proposed Residential Development, Old Church Road, Caledon East

Santa Cruz North Interior

Existing Resource Information

VI. ALTERNATIVES TO THE MASTER PLAN C. RENOVATED EAST BUILDING ALTERNATIVE

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

SECTION 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER BASIN

BROCHURE. APPLE HILL WOODS 118 +/- Acres Camino, California. Presented by Jim Copeland

HIGH COUNTRY L-BAR RANCH

Gardner: overview. Santa Fe, Oregon, and California National Historic Trails UNINCORPORATED JOHNSON COUNTY OLATHE UNINCORPORATED JOHNSON COUNTY

STAFF REPORT. Airport Land Use Consistency Determination Betteravia Plaza. MEETING DATE: January 21, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 8D

A. From I-68 in Monongalia County, West Virginia to SR 6119 in Fayette County, Pennsylvania 1

Chapter 2: El Dorado County Characteristics and Demographics

Section 3.6 Recreation

Lake Wissota Access Locations within the LaFayette Township. By Chad Martin

DOYLE SPRINGS PLANNING UNIT Kern-Tule River Watershed

City of LA Valley Glen - North Sherman Oaks STUDY AREA PROFILE

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation September 22, 2011 BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL: HOOD MOUNTAIN TO HIGHWAY 12

City of Durango 5.8 FUNDING TRAILS DEVELOPMENT

1 Permanent Full Time Forester GS /07/09 Kaibab National Forest Duty Station: Williams or Tusayan, AZ

Outreach Notice. FREMONT-WINEMA NATIONAL FOREST Zone Planning Staff GS Winter Rim Zone Paisley and Silver Lake Ranger Districts

APPENDIX OFFICIAL MAP ORDINANCE OF HAMILTONBAN TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL MAP NARRATIVE

Dear Councilmembers of the Arts, Entertainment, Parks and River Committee:

Stephens Rd. Nature Preserve

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

I-579 Urban Open Space CAP Project. Final Land Development Plan (FLDP) Pittsburgh Department of City Planning

BACKGROUND DECISION. Decision Memo Page 1 of 6

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

FEASIBILITY CRITERIA

LIVE. WORK. PLAY. STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT SPRING Produced for information by the City of Markham

SAN MIGUEL CREEK RANCH. q Trinidad, Las Animas County, Colorado q

Frizzell Creek Ranch Summerville, OR $1,400, ± Acres

Transcription:

II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING A. LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES The proposed Canyon Hills project site is located at 8000 West La Tuna Canyon Road in the City of Los Angeles (the City ). The project site is entirely within the Verdugo Mountains in the northeastern San Fernando Valley. The Verdugo Mountains are geographically defined by the San Fernando Valley to the west, the Los Angeles Basin to the south, the San Gabriel Valley to the east, and the communities of Sunland and Tujunga to the north (see Figure II-1). The 887-acre project site is an irregularly-shaped property that extends along a southeast to northwest axis, and is roughly bounded by Verdugo Crestline Drive on the north and La Tuna Canyon Road on the south. The Foothill Freeway (Interstate 210) bisects the project site into northern and southern subareas. The project site is bounded on the north by single-family homes within the Sunland and Tujunga communities. To the northeast and east, the project site borders single-family homes within the community of Tujunga. B. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING This section provides a brief overview of the project site s regional and local setting. Additional descriptions of the environmental setting as it relates to each of the environmental issues analyzed in this Draft EIR are included in the environmental setting discussions contained within Sections IV.A through IV.N. Also, a list of related projects used as the basis for the discussion of cumulative impacts in Section IV (Environmental Impact Analysis) is provided below. Regional Setting The Canyon Hills project site is located in the northeastern San Fernando Valley in the City, approximately 15 miles north of downtown Los Angeles. As previously discussed, the project site is entirely contained within the Verdugo Mountains. Although surrounded by the urbanization of the greater Los Angeles region, the Verdugo Mountains remain a largely undeveloped island of steep terrain. Much of the higher elevations of the Verdugo Mountains have been preserved as permanent open space through public acquisitions. However, the lower gentler slopes have been subject to development, such as in the communities of Glendale and Sunland-Tujunga. Within the Verdugo Mountains, the project site is located in an undeveloped area in the upper reaches of La Tuna Canyon, a major watershed that drains westerly to the eastern end of the San Fernando Valley. Page II-1

Figure II-1, Project Location and Regional Vicinity Page II-2

Local Setting The project site is largely bounded by undeveloped land and existing residential areas. The project site s northern boundary roughly coincides with the major ridgeline that divides La Tuna Canyon on the south from the communities of Sunland and Tujunga to the north. Most of the steeply descending north-facing slopes north of the project site are undeveloped. There are existing single-family homes and neighborhoods located adjacent to the northeastern portion of the project site. Some of the homes to the northeast overlook the project site. Undeveloped hillsides comprise much of the land to the south of the project site, some of which have been permanently preserved as open space. In particular, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy owns the 1,100-acre La Tuna Canyon Park located directly to the south of the project site. Wildwood Canyon Park, DeBell Golf Course and residential neighborhoods, and the City of Burbank are also located south of the project site. In addition, there is a small cluster of homes along La Tuna Canyon Road near the southwestern boundary of the project site north of La Tuna Canyon Road. The City of Glendale is located approximately 1.5 miles east of the project site. West of the project site, residential development is concentrated along La Tuna Canyon Road. Further west, in the vicinity of Sunland Boulevard, there are commercial and industrial land uses. The commercial development primarily consists of small retail business along Sunland Boulevard. A dam and a debris basin are also located to the west of the project site. The Hansen Dam Recreation Area is located at the western end of the Tujunga Wash, northwest of the project site. The Hansen Dam Recreation Area offers a variety of recreational opportunities, including biking, educational programs, fishing, hiking, horseback riding, and water sports. Just east of the project site, Haines Canyon Park and Verdugo Hills Golf Course provide additional recreational opportunities to nearby residents. Project Site The project site is an 887-acre, irregularly-shaped property that extends along a southeast to northwest axis, and is roughly bounded by Verdugo Crestline Drive on the north and La Tuna Canyon Road on the south. The project site is bisected into northern and southern subareas by Interstate 210. The portion of the freeway that passes through the project site was constructed in the early 1970s. Several cut and fill areas with large embankments within the project site were constructed in conjunction with the freeway. Various minor access roads and leveled areas are mainly concentrated in the northern subarea of the project site. Southern California Edison (SCE) regional electrical transmission lines with towers and associated right-of-way (ROW) transect the project site north of the freeway from east to west. Fire roads and breaks meander throughout the project site. In addition, a neighboring resident Page II-3

recently constructed an equestrian arena, corral fence, rail fence and feed shed that encroach onto the southwest corner of the project site. Generally, the project site is characterized by steep mountainous terrain with distinctive ridgelines that drop into deep V shaped canyons. With local elevation changes up to 904 vertical feet, elevations range from approximately 1,160 feet above sea level (ASL) to 2,064 feet ASL. Natural slope gradients range from 3:1 to as steep as 0.75:1 (horizontal:vertical). The northern subarea of the project site is distinguished by an east-west trending ridgeline with several connecting north-south trending secondary ridgelines. Elevations in the northern subarea of the project site range from approximately 1,416 feet ASL to 2,064 feet ASL. The southern subarea of the project site is dominated by north-south trending ridgelines with intervening canyons. Elevations in the southern subarea of the project site range from approximately 1,160 feet ASL to 1,818 feet ASL. The La Tuna Canyon drainage, which drains westerly to the San Fernando Valley, is the most prominent topographic feature in the southern subarea of the project site. The majority of the project site is covered by California native vegetation typically found in chaparral and open scrub habitats, and is drought tolerant. Vegetation on the project site generally includes desert sage, trees, scrub and grass. There are approximately 1,307 oak trees (Quercus agrifolia) 1 on the project site with diameters at breast height (DBH) at eight inches or greater. There are approximately 148 sycamore trees (Platanus racemosa) with DBHs of 12 inches or greater on the project site. Wildlife in the area includes a number of large and small animal species, including coyotes, mule deer, American badgers, bobcats, gray foxes, woodrats, raccoons, birds, lizards and snakes. While the rugged landscape and dense vegetation that dominate the project site somewhat restricts wildlife movement by larger animals, there are currently four local wildlife movement paths across portions of the project site that utilize existing drainages and unimproved roads. These and other biological resources are discussed in further detail in Section IV.D (Biological Resources). Applicable Local and Regional Plans City of Los Angeles General Plan The project site is governed by the City of Los Angeles Sunland-Tujunga-Lake View Terrace-Shadow Hills-East La Tuna Canyon Community Plan ( Sunland-Tujunga Community Plan ) and the Sun Valley-La Tuna Canyon Community Plan ( Sun Valley Community Plan ), which comprise portions of 1 The 1,307 oak trees do not include two trees on the Duke Property that may be impacted as a result of the proposed project (see Section IV.D (Biological Resources)). Page II-4

the Land Use Element of the City s General Plan. The western portion of the project site, consisting of approximately 250 acres (28 percent), lies within the Sun Valley Community Plan area. The eastern portion of the project site, consisting of approximately 637 acres (72 percent), is located in the Sunland- Tujunga Community Plan area. In these Community Plan areas, portions of the project site have been designated as Minimum Residential, Very Low I Residential, Very Low II Residential and Open Space. As shown on Table II-1, the Community Plans currently designate approximately 748 acres (84.3 percent) of the project site as Minimum Residential (up to 1 dwelling unit per acre). The Sunland- Tujunga Community Plan designates smaller areas in the eastern portion of the project site as Very Low I Residential (1 to 3 dwelling units per acre) and Very Low II Residential (3 to 4 dwelling units per acre). The Sunland-Tujunga Community Plan encourages the clustering of development in hillside areas. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable policies of the Sunland-Tujunga and Sun Valley Community Plans. The consistency of the proposed project with Community Plans is discussed in detail in Section IV.G (Land Use). Table II-1 Existing Community Plan Designations Community Plan Designation Acres Minimum Residential 748 Very Low I Residential 120 Very Low II Residential 10 Open Space 9 Total 887 San Gabriel/Verdugo Mountains Scenic Preservation Specific Plan The draft San Gabriel/Verdugo Mountains Scenic Preservation Specific Plan (Draft Specific Plan) includes requirements and restrictions that are generally applicable to the proposed project. The proposed project has been designed for consistency with the Draft Specific Plan. The consistency of the proposed project with the Draft Specific Plan is discussed in detail in Section IV.G (Land Use). Significant Ecological Areas (County of Los Angeles General Plan) The project site is within the County of Los Angeles Verdugo Mountains Significant Ecological Area (SEA) No. 40. However, County SEA policies only apply to areas outside of incorporated cities, and the project site is entirely contained within the City (see Section IV.G (Land Use) for additional information). Page II-5

Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide Although the project site is within Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) planning area, according to SCAG, the proposed project is not regionally significant per SCAG Intergovernmental Review (IGR) Criteria and CEQA. 2 Therefore, the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG) does not include any policies that are applicable to the proposed project. The RCPG is discussed in more detail in Section IV.G (Land Use). City of Los Angeles Municipal Code The project site is currently zoned A1 (Agricultural), A1-K (Agricultural-Equestrian) and RE11 (Residential Estate), as shown in Table II-2 and Figure IV.G-4. The consistency of the proposed project with the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) is discussed in detail in Section IV.G (Land Use). Table II-2 Existing Zoning Designations Zoning Designation Acres A1 Agricultural 860 A1-K Agricultural Equestrian 24 RE11 Residential Estate 3 Total 887 C. RELATED PROJECTS Sections 15126 and 15130 of the CEQA Guidelines provide that EIRs consider the significant environmental effects of a proposed project, as well as cumulative impacts. Cumulative impacts are two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15355). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130, cumulative impacts are anticipated impacts of the proposed project along with reasonably foreseeable growth. Reasonably foreseeable growth may be based on: A list of past, present, and probably future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency; or 2 Correspondence from SCAG, Jeffrey M. Smith, AICP, Senior Regional Planner, September 19, 2002. Page II-6

A summary of projections contained in the adopted general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental document which has been adopted or certified, which described or evaluated regional or area wide conditions contributing to the cumulative impact. All proposed, recently approved, under construction, and reasonably foreseeable projects that could produce a related or cumulative impact on the local environment when considered in conjunction with the proposed project are evaluated in this Draft EIR. An analysis of the cumulative impacts associated with these related projects and the proposed project is provided in the cumulative impact discussion under each individual impact category in Section IV (Environmental Impact Analysis) of this Draft EIR. In coordination with the City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation, City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning, and the City of Glendale Department of Transportation, a list of 13 related projects was developed. The list of related projects consists of approved or proposed projects within the project area. As shown in Table II-3, the 13 projects include various land uses such as single-family residential, commercial, retail, restaurant and a golf course. The locations of the related projects are shown in Figure II-2. Cumulative impacts analyzed in this Draft EIR were conservatively assessed. Some of the related projects may not be approved, and some approved projects may not be developed. In addition, many of the related projects have been or will be subject to a variety of mitigation measures that will reduce the potential environmental impacts associated with those projects. However, with limited exceptions, those mitigation measures have not been taken into account in projecting the environmental impact of the related projects. Therefore, the cumulative analyses set forth below are conservative and result in greater impacts than actually anticipated. Page II-7

Table II-3 Related Projects a Map No. Project Location Land Use Size Status 1 99-169 6723 Foothill Boulevard Fast-Food Restaurant 3,050 sf Proposed 2 00-401 7611 Foothill Boulevard Mini-Market (expansion) 3,827 sf Proposed 3 00-3267 b 6520 Foothill Boulevard (Tujunga Shopping Center) Shopping Center 46,814 sf Under Construction 4 97-0155 7433 Apperson Street Church (expansion) 8,000 sf Proposed 5 00-0687 6901 Foothill Boulevard Auto Repair 6,080 sf Proposed 6 00-2989 8250 Foothill Boulevard Auto Repair 25,000 sf Proposed 7 Duke Development/Hill View Estates Single-Family Residential 10 DU Approved 8 01-3434 ARCO Station 7200 Foothill Boulevard Gas Station Convenience Store Car Wash 20 fuel pos. 3,600 sf Proposed 9 La Crescenta Single-Family Residential 125 DU Proposed 10 c Verdugo Hills Family YMCA Project 6840 Foothill Boulevard YMCA (expansion) 7,508 sf Proposed 11 Foothill Boulevard between Foothill Place and Wentworth Street 12 d All Nations Church Foothill Boulevard east of Wheatland Ave. and I-210 Ramps 13 K-Mart Expansion Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Woodward Avenue Golf Course 160 acres Under Construction Sanctuary/Chapel/Sunday School/Administrative Office Gymnasium Tennis Courts Discount Store (expansion) 52,000 GSF 8,000 GSF 5 courts Approved 56,426 GSF Proposed a Source: City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation and Department of Planning. b Source: "Traffic Impact Study, Tujunga Shopping Center," prepared by LLG Engineers, February, 2000. c Source: "Traffic Impact Study, Verdugo Hills Family YMCA Project," prepared by LLG Engineers, June, 2002. d Source: "Traffic Impact Study, All Nations Church," prepared by LLG Engineers, September, 1999. Page II-8

Figure II-2, Location of Related Projects Page II-9