Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill. Scottish Borders Council ( Promoter ) WAVERLEY RAILWAY

Similar documents
Borders Railway: What is the impact two years on?

WAVERLEY RAILWAY (SCOTLAND) BILL

East Lancashire Highways and Transport Masterplan East Lancashire Rail Connectivity Study Conditional Output Statement (Appendix 'A' refers)

transport.gov.scot Borders Railway Year 1 Evaluation

Report of the Strategic Director of Place to the meeting of Executive to be held on 11 September 2018

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. 22 June 2016 DEVELOPING THE CULTURAL OFFER IN PERTH AND KINROSS UPDATE AND NEXT STEPS

Rail Delivery Group. Consultation on the future of the East Midlands rail franchise

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Housing and Health Committee. 25 May Perth and Kinross Local Housing Strategy

Borders Railway - Scottish Borders Work Plan

Agenda 11. Strathclyde Bus Alliance progress update. Date of meeting 9 December 2016 Date of report 15 November 2016

Tourism Development Framework for Scotland. Executive Summary- Development Framework to 2020 for the Visitor Economy (Refresh 2016)

The Government s Aviation Strategy Transport for the North (TfN) response

Infrastructure for Growth

STRATEGIC INVESTMENT IN MANCHESTER AIRPORT

Re-opening of the Skipton to Colne Railway Executive Summary

REPORT ON CHARGING FOR CAR PARKING AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CEL1 (2008) WITHIN NHS LOTHIAN

.org.uk. Regional. Transport. Strategy. Revised June Serving Dumfries and Galloway. South West of Scotland Transport Partnership

THIRTEENTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC

EAST WEST RAIL EASTERN SECTION. prospectus for growth

A Response to: Belfast On The Move Transport Masterplan for Belfast City Centre, Sustainable Transport Enabling Measures

Performance Criteria for Assessing Airport Expansion Alternatives for the London Region

The Strategic Commercial and Procurement Manager

Clyde Waterfront and Renfrew Riverside Project Glasgow Airport Investment Area Project

Terms of Reference: Introduction

Local Government and Regeneration Committee Public Service Reform Strand 3 January 2013 SUBMISSION FROM THE HIGHLAND COUNCIL

Scotland s railways - today

CBD Rail Link Business Case

2. Our response follows the structure of the consultation document and covers the following issues in turn:

Item 1. Leadership Board. On: 1 April Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services. Heading: Update on City Deal. 1.

East West Rail Consortium

Airdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter twelve Social impact. Chapter content

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ABERDEEN AIRPORT

Update on the Thameslink programme

Agenda Item 5: Rail East Midlands Rail Franchise Consultation

POLICY SUBMISSION NETWORK RAIL SCOTLAND RAIL ROUTE UTILISATION STRATEGY. January

Corporate Report Format 28 February 2017

The Challenges for the European Tourism Sustainable

Wales. Andy Thomas. Route Managing Director Wales. Ken Skates, Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Infrastructure, Welsh Government

Calderdale MBC. Wards Affected: Town. Economy and Investment Panel: 20 October Halifax Station Gateway Masterplan

TfL Planning. 1. Question 1

Ryeish Green and Grays Fruit Farm Sports Hub Projects. Shinfield South and Wokingham Without. Heather Thwaites, Director of Environment

Strategic Transport Forum

Team London Bridge Response to the Department for Transport Consultation on the combined Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise

Foregone Economic Benefits from Airport Capacity Constraints in EU 28 in 2035

Rail Update Station Usage Statistics and Network Rail Performance

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

South of England north-south connectivity

Transport Delivery Committee

Section A: Scheme Summary

BARNSLEY METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Enterprise and Infrastructure Committee 4 November 2009

FEDERAL BUDGET PRIORITIES FOR THE SOUTH WEST METROPOLITAN REGION 2018 TO 2022

SUBMISSION FROM RENFREWSHIRE COUNCIL

WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF LIBERALIZATION. Montreal, 24 to 29 March 2003

Frequently Asked Questions

VISITSCOTLAND ICENTRE UPDATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. 5 December Report by Executive Director

Prospect ATCOs Branch & ATSS Branch response to CAP Terminal Air Navigation Services (TANS) contestability in the UK: Call for evidence

FOR CONSIDERATION BY The Executive on 30 October Angus Ross, Executive Member for Environment

West London Economic Prosperity Board. 21 March Summary. Title Orbital Rail in West London

OBJECTION TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNING SCHEME AND GRANTING OF PLANNING PERMIT

Views of London Forum of Amenity and Civic Societies to the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee on the Airports Commission report

An Introduction to HS2

FirstGroup plc South Western

Gold Coast: Modelled Future PIA Queensland Awards for Planning Excellence 2014 Nomination under Cutting Edge Research category

LINCOLNSHIRE PARKING POLICY DRAFT

Submission to the Airports Commission

Alternative service delivery models in place in Scottish local authorities: summary report

TAYplan SDPA. Main Issues Report. Options for Scotland s s SusTAYnable Region (Strategic Development Planning Authority)

ANGLIAN WATER GREEN BOND

2015/16. Council LOGO ATTRACTIVE SEAMLESS RELIABLE IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY ACCESS FOR ALL REDUCED EMISSIONS

GLASGOW CITY REGION CITY DEAL

Benefits of NEXTT. Nick Careen SVP, APCS. Will Squires Project Manager, Atkins. Anne Carnall Program Manager, NEXTT

Submission on the Bankstown Airport Preliminary Draft Master Plan

CAIRNS RECTANGULAR PITCH STADIUM NEEDS STUDY PART 1 CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL DRAFT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2011

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL 1 OCTOBER 2008 ADULT SUPPORT AND PROTECTION. Report by the Executive Director (Housing & Community Care)

Wellington $312 $49 $456 OVERVIEW WELLINGTON REGIONAL SUMMARY

Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package)

Gatwick Airport s Assessment of Heathrow North-West Runway: Air Noise. July The world s leading sustainability consultancy

Update on the development of the Regional Real Time Passenger Information (RTPI) System

PHASE SPACES NOW RELEASED

Strategic Transport Forum 21 st September 2018

Crossrail Business Case Update: Summary Report July 2011

PO Box 257 PO Box 257 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124

Forest Hill Society response to the draft London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy (February 2011)

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

MAXIMUM LEVELS OF AVIATION TERMINAL SERVICE CHARGES that may be imposed by the Irish Aviation Authority ISSUE PAPER CP3/2010 COMMENTS OF AER LINGUS

1.2. The meeting agreed a set of guiding principles that officers were to use in developing the revised Terms of Reference.

PRTF: Northern Route Workstream

WELSH GOVERNMENT RESPONSE P Ensure Disabled People can Access Public Transport As and When They Need it

HEART OF THE SOUTH WEST STUDY ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF RAIL NETWORK UPGRADE PROPOSALS

Re: CAP 1541 Consultation on core elements of the regulatory framework to support capacity expansion at Heathrow

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL. Council Meeting 17 May 2017 APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVES TO PARTNER ORGANISATIONS AND OUTSIDE BODIES

CABINET 1 MARCH 2016 DEVELOPMENT OF A RAIL STRATEGY FOR LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORT PART A

Financial Scrutiny Unit Briefing Tourism in Scotland

As part of our transport vision, Leeds City Council, working with the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and Leeds Bradford Airport Company, is

East Lothian. Skills Assessment January SDS-1154-Jan16

Workplace Parking Levies: the contribution of commuters to funding public transport. Sue Flack Consultant

Evaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba

Transcription:

Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill Scottish Borders Council ( Promoter ) WAVERLEY RAILWAY Non -Technical Summary of the Outline Business Case submitted to the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill Committee Turner & Townsend Management Solutions Turner & Townsend Management Solutions Registration No: 3154483 DOCUMENT4

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 1 Overview of Outline Business Case for The Waverley Railway 1. The Promoter, City of Edinburgh Council and Midlothian Council have applied to the Integrated Transport Fund (operated by the Scottish Executive) for funding for the Waverley Railway in the sum of 110 million by way of the submission to them of an Outline Business Case ( OBC ), a copy of which may be examined on the Scottish Parliament s website (www.scottish.parliament.uk/com-wav-bill/index.htm). 2. The Waverley Railway is of national importance and is the first phase in reinstating a rail link from Edinburgh to Carlisle. 3. The purpose of this non-technical summary is to ensure that the key points of the OBC including the findings of the studies assessing and underpinning the business case for the Waverley Railway (including the accruing social and economic benefits) can be readily understood by non-experts and decision makers. 4. The cost of the Waverley Railway has been robustly assessed at 129.6 million (2002 prices) 1. 5. The Promoter believes that the Waverley Railway represents good value for money when assessed against accepted principles of economic evaluation and the wider social and economic benefits which it will deliver. 6. In strict transport economic terms the base case (on which the OBC is based) of the Waverley Railway will produce a benefit cost ratio of 0.96 and a net present value (NPV) of Minus (-) 8.6 million 2. The Promoter believes 1 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 50 2 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 52

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 2 that this benefit cost ratio and a NPV are not significantly adverse and importantly are outweighed by the wider social and economic benefits referred to below. 7. In the OBC the Promoter has also applied various sensitivities to the base case which give benefit cost ratios of up to 1.04 and NPV of up to 9.2 million over 30 years 3. 8. In wider socio-economic terms the benefits of the Waverley Railway will be much greater. It will operate as a re-generation catalyst bringing substantial benefits to a deprived area of Scotland. These include sustainable benefits relating to job creation, access to employment, increasing competitiveness of local businesses, housing and inward investment. 9. Over a 30 year period the total value of economic benefits in all of these areas based purely on currently approved development schemes is in the ranges of: 49.6 million to 225.1 million to the Scottish Borders 5.1 million to 7.7 million to Midlothian 10.8 million to 16.1 million to Edinburgh 26.7 million to 56.7 million to Scotland 4 10. The benefits include the creation of between 63 and 213 jobs in the Scottish Borders alone 5. It should also be noted that all these benefits will continue to be accrued beyond the 30 year appraisal period. 3 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pgs 5 & 52 4 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Appendix 7 DTZ Pieda, Economic Impact Appraisal, pg 27 5 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Appendix 7 DTZ Pieda, Economic Impact Appraisal, pg44

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 3 11. The Waverley Railway is the strategic key to unlocking the long-term economic potential of the South East of Scotland, by providing effective access to the buoyant Edinburgh labour market and assisting Edinburgh to manage its demand for housing by spreading commuter pressure southwards. This in turn assists the sustainability of the Scottish Borders by creating the critical mass necessary to maintain Borders' services, important institutions and ultimately the local communities.

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 4 Introduction 12. The purpose of this non-technical summary is to ensure that the key points of the OBC including the findings of the studies assessing and underpinning the business case for the Waverley Railway (including the accruing social and economic benefits) can be readily understood by non-experts and decision makers. 13. The OBC is a joint bid between the Promoter, City of Edinburgh Council and Midlothian Council for funding for the Waverley Railway in the sum of 110million from the Scottish Executive under its Integrated Transport Fund. They have developed the OBC together, with strong support from Scottish Enterprise Borders (SEB), Scottish Enterprise Edinburgh and Lothian (SEE&L). Network Rail and ScotRail have also been advising the Promoter. 14. The Waverley Railway will re-establish the Waverley Line and become one of the key transport arteries connecting the Borders communities with central Scotland. It will provide an efficient passenger public transport link from the Borders through Midlothian to Edinburgh and beyond, serving settlements along the route. It will provide significant timesavings at peak times and other sustainable economic and transport benefits when compared to road transport. Park and Ride facilities and new bus feeder services to the new stations will also open the Waverley Railway up to a wide catchment area ensuring its benefits are maximised. 15. Times taken from the stations to Edinburgh are: Tweedbank 60 minutes Galashiels 55 minutes

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 5 Gorebridge 30 minutes Newtongrange 24 minutes Eskbank 20 minutes Shawfair 16 minutes 6 16. The outcome of the Promoter s extensive consultations on the Waverley Railway with key stakeholders and the public is one of widespread support. The most recent Quality of Life survey carried out by the New Ways Planning Partnership highlighted the strength of positive feeling towards the rail line with 82% of respondents being supportive of the proposal. 7 6 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case - Appendix 6, Project Newsletter, Summer 2004, pg 2 7 Waverley Railway Newsletter, Summer 2004, pg 15 (Outline Business Case - Appendix 6)

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 6 Route 17. During the development of the Waverley Railway many options were considered and assessed against various social, engineering, economic and environmental factors. The final scheme is the result of robust evaluation and is as follows 8 : bring into passenger use a 47km section of rail from Newcraighall to the Central Borders; provide new railway stations at Shawfair, Eskbank, Newtongrange, Gorebridge, Galashiels and Tweedbank; 8 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg23

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 7 provide secure Park-and-Ride facilities next to the proposed stations wherever feasible, with feeder bus services to Galashiels and Tweedbank from other parts of the Scottish Borders and bus connections to the Midlothian stations being encouraged. Walking and cycling links will also be developed; and serve the new stations by the extension of the (generally half-hourly) train services from Newcraighall, which will continue through Edinburgh Waverley to points west/north-west of Edinburgh, Central Scotland and beyond, and eventually, the central Scottish Airports. 9 9 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 23

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 8 The Waverley Railway Objectives and How it Meets those Objectives 10 18. The two overarching and complementary objectives are providing effective access to the buoyant Edinburgh labour market and in turn assisting Edinburgh to manage its demand for housing by spreading commuter pressure southwards. This in turn assists the sustainability of the Scottish Borders by creating the critical mass necessary to maintain Borders' services and important institutions and ultimately the local communities. The principle objectives of the Waverley Railway and how these are met are summarised below 11 :- 19. To secure ready access to Edinburgh s buoyant labour market for workers living in the area to be served by the railway;- Edinburgh has a rapidly growing economy and labour market which the Waverley Railway will enable residents of the Borders and Midlothian to access easily. 20. To provide a labour supply for key industries and contribute to the growth of the capital; - Edinburgh cannot sustain the current level of growth without additional labour from the surrounding areas, the Waverley Railway will enable this. 21. To provide an incentive to inward investment in Midlothian and the Scottish Borders area by providing an attractive public transport option the Waverley Railway will markedly improve the perception of the Scottish Borders and Midlothian as an area to invest in. 10 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Section A3-Scheme Objectives, pgs 26-30 11 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pgs 12-15

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 9 22. To assist the City of Edinburgh and the Lothians to manage their demand for housing by spreading commuter pressure southwards; the Waverley Railway is essential to prevent such movement resulting in an increase in longer car commuting journeys and hence congestion of the Edinburgh approaches; - the Scottish Borders has strong potential to assist in providing a range of housing to support the increased demand for labour in the Capital. 23. To improve accessibility of the Scottish Borders as a "connected place", thereby increasing the attractiveness of the area as a location for business investment and for people to live and work; - the Waverley Railway will allow the Scottish Borders to interact strongly with Edinburgh s expanding economy proving opportunities for business development 24. To increase the potential for future commuter trips to Edinburgh to be made by public transport rather than by car and therefore reducing the projected increase in congestion, particularly in the Southern approaches to Edinburgh; - the Waverley Railway provides a realistic and attractive alternative to the car for existing and future commuter trips to Edinburgh assisting in reducing congestion on the southern Edinburgh approaches. 25. To promote accessibility to and from the Scottish Borders and Midlothian to the Capital and Central Belt including Edinburgh Airport;- the Waverley Railway will increase accessibility to all these areas, particularly for those who have no or limited access to a car. In turn this will open up new job and education opportunities, for Borders and Midlothian residents as well as opening up the whole area for those without access to a car. 26. To stimulate new housing development and to assist in the growth of Scottish Borders population including the reversal of the ageing trend of the present population; - the Waverley Railway will stimulate new housing and

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 10 access to the Edinburgh labour market helping to re-establish Borders as a desirable place to live. 27. To increase local spend in the Scottish Borders and to increase the vibrancy and sustainability of the Community; - As well as attracting new population the Waverley Railway will help the Scottish Borders realise its full potential as a recreational and tourist destination, increasing spend in the Community. 28. To assist with the retention of population in the Scottish Borders by providing efficient transportation and thereby removing the need for those affected by job losses having to relocate outwith the area to obtain new employment.

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 11 Preferred Option For The Waverley Railway 12 Evolution of the Waverley Railway 13 29. The desire to reinstate a public transport link between the Borders and Edinburgh has existed since the original Waverley Railway line was closed in 1969 14. 30. Various studies were undertaken to look at the feasibility of re-establishing the rail service. These looked at the economic case as well as non-rail alternatives. Following a pre-feasibility study by Borders Transport Futures a full feasibility study was then commissioned by the Scottish Development Department. This study was further developed using Public Transport Fund monies resulting in the Waverley Railway now before the Scottish Parliament. Alternatives Considered 13 31. The feasibility study also considered alternatives to rail eg; a do minimum scheme and other rail options. The do minimum option was a busway provided by a combination of new infrastructure and existing public roads. There would be 4 buses/hr and they would be new buses. The capital cost was 16.6m for construction and 11 new buses ( 120k each) 15. Compared 12 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Section B Preferred Option Business Case, pgs 43-48 13 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 43 14 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg19 15 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg43

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 12 to the Waverley Railway this alternative produced a lower reduction in congestion and accident benefits and did not attract as many passengers out of cars. Importantly, this alternative would not deliver the socioeconomic benefits of the Waverley Railway. 32. Light rail was considered but was shown to be as expensive as heavy rail without all the socio-economic benefits of the Waverley Railway. 16 33. The Promoter concluded that only the Waverley Railway would meet the stated objectives and deliver all of the stated socio-economic benefits. 34. Freight rail was also considered by the Promoter but was discounted at this stage as there is no through running. The Waverley Railway does not preclude the establishment of freight provision at a later date which would have to be the subject of a full assessment of the economic case therefore and an environmental impact assessment. 35. Alternative local alignment options were considered. This confirmed that a 1/2 hr service between Waverley Station Edinburgh and Tweedbank offered the best value for money and was most effective in achieving the stated objectives 17. 16 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg44 17 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg47

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 13 Station locations and 18 Termini Options Considered 19 36. The station locations were broadly defined in the earlier feasibility studies focusing broadly on the main population centres. The one exception to this is the proposal for a station at Shawfair which is a new settlement allocated in the adopted Shawfair Local Plan. The stations originally considered were at Shawfair, Eskbank, Newtongrange, Gorebridge, Stow, Galshiels, Tweedbank and Charlesfield. 37. Stations at each of these various locations were evaluated and the costs and benefits considered. Following this exercise, Stow was excluded as the disbenefits far outweighed the projected patronage. Charlesfield was also excluded as the capital costs of extending far outweighed the benefits 20. 38. A further option of terminating at Gorebridge was also considered. This was also rejected despite demonstrating a strong transport case as this failed to deliver any of the wider regeneration benefits and would not assist the sustainability of the Scottish Borders. 39. The feasibility studies concluded that the proposal for a passenger train service from Edinburgh to Tweedbank would bring optimum benefits to Scottish Borders, Midlothian and Edinburgh achieving all of the stated objectives and delivering all of the stated benefits 21. 18 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pgs 45-48 19 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg24 20 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg47 21 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 43

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 14 Waverley Railway Costs and Benefits 22 Waverley Railway Costs 40. The costs of the Waverley Railway are summarised as; Capital cost (2002 prices) 129.6m 23 Operating costs for Class 170 train are 6.34 m per annum 24 Benefits - STAG Stage Two 25 41. Once the preferred option had been determined the Waverley Railway was assessed further using the methodology prescribed by the draft Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidelines (STAG). STAG is a two stage assessment process, the first stage is used to determine the preferred option and was encompassed within the feasibility study. Stage two then assesses this option further against key government objectives relating to the economy, integration, accessibility and social inclusion, safety, environment, risk and uncertainty and cost to government. The main output from Stage two is the production of an Appraisal Summary Table (AST) which includes the 22 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Section B2 Scheme Costs and Benefits, pgs 49-65 23 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 50 24 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 53 25 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Appendix 1, Appraisal Summary Tables

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 15 Transport Economic Efficiency as reported below. Other benefits reported in the AST for the base case over a 30 year period include; 63.7 m total discounted time saving benefits 25.2 m discounted operating cost benefits 173.4 m (2002 prices) present value of revenue Benefits - Transport Economic Efficiency 26 42. The Transport Economic Efficiency is one of the key evaluation criteria within STAG. A Transport Economic Efficiency (TEE) analysis identifies and measures the impacts of a project on all affected parties, including current users and operators of all modes of transport, together with the impact on non-users and the public sector in general. 43. The pure transport benefits of the Waverley Railway calculated by the TEE over a 30 year period (excluding social-economic) are summarised as:- Providing a Net Present Value in the range of - 8.6m to 9.2m Generating revenue of 4.7m in the first year Revenue increasing to 6.15m by year 5 and increasing beyond to break even by 2013. 44. This analysis was further enhanced by a number of sensitivity tests which lead to a better understanding and objective assessment of the risks associated with the Waverley Railway. The scenarios considered varying 26 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Appendix 2 Transport Economic Efficiency Tables

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 16 fare levels, periods of housing development and the occupancy rates of housing development. The key scenarios are shown below 27. Scenario Discounted over 30 years at 3.5% With Residual Value B/C ratio NPV m With Cost Output prices Index (COPI) Residual Value B/C NPV m ratio 5 (Base case) Lower level Housing Occupancy to 2011, Ignoring evenings and weekend fares 6 High level Housing Occupancy to 2011, Ignoring evenings and weekend fares 7 Lower level Housing Occupancy to 2030, Ignoring evenings and weekend fares 8 High level Housing Occupancy to 2030, Ignoring evenings and weekend fares 0.96-8.6 1.01 2.3 0.97-7.2 1.02 3.7 1.03 6.8 1.07 17.7 1.04 9.2 1.08 20.1 45. The base case for the Waverley Railway assumes a flat fare, utilises lower level housing occupancy and only allows for housing development to 2011. In transport terms, the benefits of the Waverley Railway are improved in the scenarios where the Councils intended long term strategic development plans are in place, as shown above. The Councils are committed to the levels of development assumed to 2011 and, in order that sustainable communities can be maintained, to facilitating appropriate development 27 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 52

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 17 through development plans review process. Without the Waverley Railway, Border communities and their development will become increasingly fragile. Benefits - Economic Impact Assessment 28 46. In addition to the STAG type appraisal a wider Economic Impact Assessment was also undertaken. This study has recently been updated but the figures presented here are consistent with those presented in the OBC. This considered some of the wider impacts and economic benefits of the Waverley Railway such as access to employment, new housing, existing businesses and inward investment. Key benefits included; 63 213 jobs created in Scottish Borders 1.6m to 4.9m income per annum in the Scottish Borders Present value of economic benefits to the Borders 27m to 109m Present value of economic benefits to Midlothian 2.7m to 4.1m Present value of economic benefits to Edinburgh 5.5m to 8.3m Present value of economic benefits to Scotland 13.8m to 29.2m 29 28 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case - Appendix 7 - DTZ Pieda, Economic Impact Appraisal, 29 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case - Appendix 7 - DTZ Pieda, Economic Impact Appraisal,

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 18 Further Benefits 47. Further extensive modelling was carried out to predict the transport and economic effects of the Waverley Railway and these are detailed below: Studies Undertaken Definition Benefits 1. EALI- by Halcrow Group Ltd, from 2002 2003 2. Economic Impact Assessment by DTZ Pieda Consulting, in November 2002. A review of the potential wider impacts of the project, including impacts on local businesses and investment opportunities, at national, regional and local levels. Impacts considered on: Existing regeneration areas and projects. Deprivation. Social Cohesion. Environment. Job Creation and Employability. Social and leisure opportunities. Measures the economic development impact of the reinstatement of the line and the impact of alternative terminal locations. New relationships between educational bodies and hospitals. New economic partnerships between firms in the area. Improved perception of the Borders. Supporting the expansion of labour supply to IT and finance sectors in Edinburgh. Providing incentives to invest in the tourism industry in the Borders. Supporting the New Ways Strategy. Access to employment an alternative means of access to Edinburgh. New housing increased potential for development. Existing businesses alternative means of access. Inward investment access

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 19 and perception of area. 63-213 jobs created. 1.6-4.9m income. 61-121 man-years of construction employment. 1.1 2.1m construction income. Midlothian benefits from improved access to Edinburgh labour market and Edinburgh can expand its labour supply. 3.Tourism study by market Specialists 4. Housing Market Study by Rydens Reviewing the potential impact of the line on the housing market in the Borders. The present value of benefits to Scottish Borders is 27-109m. An additional 1,076,443/annum into Borders region over next 10 years and 26 FTE s. Requirement in Edinburgh and Lothian Structure Plan for 70, 200 new homes to service the Edinburgh economy by 2015. This project will improve the accessibility of Borders and Midlothian to this market and subsequent 1800 houses have been identified as additional development directly of this railway. 48. These benefits reinforce two of the principal objectives of the Waverley Railway effective access to the buoyant Edinburgh labour market and to

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 20 assist Edinburgh to manage housing demand, which in turn will assist the long-term sustainability of the Borders. Without the Waverley Railway none of the stated benefits would be delivered.

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 21 Procurement 30 49. The planned construction start date for the Waverley Raliway is 2005, with a 3-year build programme. Operation then begins in 2008 and is likely to continue well beyond the 30 year evaluation period. 50. The procurement route will be chosen by way of a more detailed analysis designed to identify options and their associated risks and to ensure that crucial decisions by the funding partners are appropriately informed. The OBC assumes that the Waverley Railway will be procured under a Design & Build contract, funded by both a Scottish Executive direct grant and Council-led partnership funding. 51. In assessing which procurement route would be most appropriate for the Waverley Railway, a number of criteria will be considered including timetable, compatibility with Government policy, advice from Network Rail, market demand, affordability, complexity, cost and quality. Although the final choice will be made at a later stage, three structures are currently being considered following discussions with Network Rail. These are: - 52. Design and Build Network Rail procured. This option would allow an open competition for the infrastructure and civil engineering works, but less risk would be transferred to the contractor. 53. Design and Build Waverley Railway Company. This company would procure the design and build contract and transfer it to Network Rail on completion. 30 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pgs 66-72

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 22 54. Early Contractor Involvement with a lead authority This method has been successfully used by the UK Highways Agency on a number of projects and involves a preferred contractor early in the procurement process in order to achieve greater benefits. 55. Following completion of this phase, a Scottish Executive Gateway review will be held to confirm the most appropriate procurement route has been identified and any resulting funding implications evaluated.

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 23 Funding Strategy 31 56. The capital cost of the Waverley Railway is 129.6 million (2002 prices). The potential funding sources available are: the Integrated Transport Fund 110.6m; Other public funding bodies 4m; and Local contributions 15m.These are summarised in the table below: Funding Summary Capital Cost (2002 prices) [Capital Cost with 4.1% Optimism Bias See section B5 risk] 129.6m [ 134.22m] Funding Scottish Executive (Integrated Transport Fund) Other Public Sector Funding Scottish Borders Enterprise Shawfair Developments contribution [possibly rising to 4.8m] S75 Scottish Borders Council Currie Road Development, Galashiels Total Potential Shortfall 110.6m 4.0m 1.0m 4.2m [ 4.8m possible*] 7.4m 1.8m 129m [or 129.6m*] 0.6m [or Nil with all Shawfair*] 31 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, Section B4 Funding Strategy, pgs73-79,

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 24 57. The funding is split with 85% anticipated to be provided by the Scottish Executive and the remainder coming from local contributions. It has been assumed that this 85:15 funding split would be retained in the face of any cost increase and that the Scottish Executive would forward fund the Waverley Railway, pending receipt of all Section 75 agreement contributions.

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 25 Key Risks 32 58. It is now industry standard that all major public sector projects seeking funding approval have their capital costs adjusted for bias and risk. 59. Construction risk the capital costs for the Waverley Railway have been prepared by assuming a traditional design and build contract with a separate operating franchise. ScotRail and Network Rail have also advised on the costings used. These costs were then subject to Quantified Risk Assessment and various simulations in order to effectively measure and manage the risk. Using the Monte Carlo simulations, a risk figure of 12.42m has been included in the capital cost figure. 60. It is also important that process risk is evaluated, i.e. that the development of the Waverley Railway is properly managed and provides assurance to key stakeholders at key stages in the process. The Office of Government has introduced the Gateway review. There are 5 key review stages carried out by the Scottish Executive before the Waverley Railway can proceed. 32 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case Section B5, Key Risks, pgs 80-88,

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 26 Project Organisation 33 61. In order to deliver the Waverley Railway it is essential that the correct internal structures and external support exists. To provide this, the Promoter has formed a joint committee of senior members from partner Councils. This committee controls progress and is supported by a working group of senior officers from each partner Council and Scottish Enterprise with ScotRail and Network Rail acting as external advisors. The working group is, in turn supported by the partner Councils internal technical, legal and financial officers and comprehensive external expertise. It is anticipated that this team will oversee the Waverley Railway through the parliamentary phase to delivery. 33 Waverley Railway Business Case, Section B6, Project Organisation, pg 89-93,

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 27 Conclusion The Waverley Railway 62. The Promoter believes that the Waverley Railway is essential to the continued growth of the Edinburgh economy by improving links to the areas of South East Scotland not presently served with an efficient public transport link. In addition, the resulting anticipated population growth in the Scottish Borders and Midlothian will significantly improve the sustainability of these areas in the face of long term decline. In particular:- 63. The Waverley Railway is identified by the Scottish Executive as one of the top ten Transport projects within Scotland s Transport: Delivering Improvements. 34 64. The Waverley Railway is seen as an integral part of the Structure Plans, Local Plans and Transport Strategies of the three Councils 35 65. The Waverley Railway will provide a significant contribution to overcoming the anticipated housing shortfall in Edinburgh by allowing the Scottish Borders to act as a viable alternative to housing in the Lothians 36 34 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 31 35 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 33 36 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 34

Waverley Railway Project Non-Technical Summary Page 28 66. The Waverley Railway will improve the stability of Midlothian and the Scottish Borders by attracting additional housing and encouraging population growth. 67. The Waverley Railway will reduce congestion in the southern approaches to Edinburgh. 68. The Waverley Railway provides economic benefits through: increased population growth; promoting inward investment; tourism; retail; stronger links to Edinburgh; increased Edinburgh/Borders partnerships; accessibility; increasing critical mass; and promoting sustainability development 69. The Waverley Railway is the key to the delivering the objectives of Smart Successful Scotland. 37 37 Waverley Railway Outline Business Case, pg 29