IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION, INC. an Idaho nonprofit corporation. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING TRAIL DIFFICULTY [adopted August 8, 2015]

Similar documents
IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION, INC. an Idaho nonprofit corporation. STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND POSITIONS [adopted September 25, 2010]

DATE: 23 March, 2011 TO: Communities FROM: BlazeSports America. RE: Accessible Trails Checklist 1

RECREATION. Seven issues were identified that pertain to the effects of travel management on outdoor recreation within portions of the project area.

January 2011 Newsletter Volume XIV Issue 1

ROUTE ANALYSIS PROCESS

GATEWAY PHASE 2. U.S. Forest Service and the Mount Shasta Trails Association

Trails Technical Committee

Snowmobile Trail Signing REF: DNR Trail Signing Handbook

Rule Governing the Designation and Establishment of All-Terrain Vehicle Use Trails on State Land

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

BAYFIELD COUNTY FOREST COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 700 ACCESS MANAGEMENT ROADS AND TRAILS

Route #2) Mt. Massive - Southwest Slopes

BILL SCHOLTES KLAMATH SPORTSMANS PARK

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E surface airspace and Class E airspace extending

Tahoe National Forest Over-Snow Vehicle Use Designation

GUIDELINES FOR SNOWMOBILE TRAIL SIGNING & PLACEMENT

Procedure for the Use of Power-Driven Mobility Devices on Mass Audubon Sanctuaries 1 September 17, 2012

Non-motorized Trail Plan & Proposal. August 8, 2014

Rocky Mountain Youth Corps Garfield County Conservation Corps Crews Final Report 2013

Presented by Dave Hiatt to attendees at the 11/6/2016 WOHVA Annual Meeting. (Mention the picture above is of the front number plate on my dirt bike)

ATV Riding Why ride? And Safety Tips When Riding. Sponsored by Back Country ATV Backcountryatv.org

Daisy Dean Trail 628/619 ATV Trail Construction

VISITOR RISK MANAGEMENT APPLIED TO AVALANCHES IN NEW ZEALAND

Logo Department Name Agency Organization Organization Address Information 5700 North Sabino Canyon Road

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum for River Management v

Preliminary Findings of Proposed Alternative

Trail Beginning Elevation: 7553 ft The Poison Creek Trailhead is located at the end of National Forest Road 646E (NF-646E).

Bus Corridor Service Options

Bradley Brook Relocation Project. Scoping Notice. Saco Ranger District. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service

ATVAM News - August 29, 2018 Newsletter of the ATV Association of Minnesota (Est. 1983)

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

Updated Ride Schedule July 27, 2013

Buford / New Castle Motorized Trail

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT May 10, Members of the Planning Commission. Joyce Parker-Bozylinski, Contract Planner

Prior to contacting the Whitecourt Trailblazers Snowmobile Club, applicants must:

09 LBL Turkey Bay Off-Highway Vehicle Area Rules & Regulations

Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District

Witte Museum Tour Painted Shelter on the Rio Grande River Saturday June 2, :30 A.M. 3:00 P.M.

Trails Classification Steering Team Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Alberta TrailNet Society

Snowmobile GUIDELINES FOR TRAIL SIGNING

Federal Register Environmental Documents. National Trail Classification System, FSM 2350, and FSH

Guidelines for Snowmobile Trail Signing and Placement STOP SLOW

SDTrucksprings. Indiana Off-roading/4x4 Guide Copyright 2015 We Specialize In:

Aspen Skiing Company Policy for Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices And Service Animals

Ridge to Rivers MINUTES. November 13, 2013

PARKS & TRAILS CLASSIFICATION

Corridor Analysis. Corridor Objectives and Strategies Express Local Limited Stop Overlay on Local Service 1 Deadhead

Architectural Review Commission

SPONSORSHIP & BOOTH SPACE

Form for Project Descriptions - December 2013 version! 1. Stone Valley Cooperative Recreation Area (SVCRA) Project Description

DECISION MEMO. Rawhide Trail #7073 Maintenance and Reconstruction

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

Table of Contents. page 3 Long term Goals Project Scope Project History. 4 User Groups Defined Trail Representative Committee. 5 Trail Users Breakdown

TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST

Crook County Oregon. Natural Resources Planning Committee Draft Report

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

Skiing and Snowshoes on Un-groomed Fernan Saddle Terrain

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Each picture below has a brief explanation of the alignment. Please review and feel free to send any questions you might have.

Decision Memo Sun Valley Super Enduro & Cross-Country Mountain Bike Race. Recreation Event

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Rural Rustic Road Program

March 14, SUBJECT: Public input to the Bureau of Land Management, Gunnison Field Office, Travel Management Plan

Discover RV ing the open road awaits...

The Witte Museum Rock Art Foundation White Shaman Preserve Guided Tours

AVALANCHE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR DENVER TRIP LEADERS Approved June 20, 2011

The Chu property is a 6.57 acre parcel located in the Town of Superior on the west side of McCaslin Boulevard. In 2014, the Town of Superior acquired

CHAPTER III: TRAIL DESIGN STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS & PERMITS

Where can I find the caches?

EMS AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS

Trail Phasing Plan. Note: Trails in the Clear Creek Canyon area (Segments will be finalized in the future to minimize wildlife impacts

Paiute Trail Hatfield-McCoy Highwood Mountains

White Mountain National Forest Saco Ranger District

JOSLIN FIELD, MAGIC VALLEY REGIONAL AIRPORT DECEMBER 2012

MANAGEMENT FACTORS TO CONSIDER REGARDING CONCURRENT TRACKED OHV USE ON GROOMED SNOWMOBILE TRAILS

FINAL TESTIMONY 1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. July 13, 2005 CONCERNING. Motorized Recreational Use of Federal Lands

Witte Museum Tour Meyers Spring Ranch Tour Saturday, September 1, a.m. - 4 p.m.

September 14, Comments of the Colorado Trail Foundation On the USFS Scoping Notice of August 13, 2010 RE: the relocation of the CDNST/CT Page 1

Green Mountain Trail Collaborative Stewardship and Communication Work Group Meeting Notes June 30, 2010

Executive Summary Downtown Park Fund Allocation HEARING DATE: MAY 5, 2016

Assessing Your Trails, Keeping Them Safe and Enjoyable

WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION POLICY/PROCEDURE

Nomination Form for Appointment of Team Leader Campsites/Facilities

Emily to Blind Lake Trail PROPOSED TRAIL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY

Fuel planning and management Sub-NPA (C) Aeroplanes/helicopters Part-NCC, Part-NCO & Part-SPO. 0 Page No: General Comment

Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Recreation and Trails

Walking Track Classification System Parks and Wildlife Service

Memo. Board of County Commissioners. FROM: Tamra Allen, Planner. Buford/New Castle Motorized Trail. Date: February 13, 2012

PARKS CANADA SIGNING ALONG PROVINCIAL HIGHWAYS

Route Combo) Mt. Bierstadt - Bierstadt, Sawtooth, Evans

Colorado s forests are slated to lose thousands of miles of roads through the new OHV Route Designation process. DON T LET IT HAPPEN!

St. Charles Saints Flying Field Safety Rules

Glasgow Street Traffic Review

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

Blueways: Rivers, lakes, or streams with public access for recreation that includes fishing, nature observation, and opportunities for boating.

NCAP Application Section E: Continuous Camp Improvement Plan

Table 3-7: Recreation opportunity spectrum class range by prescription. Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) Classes

DECISION MEMO North Zone (Legacy Trails) Trail Stabilization Project

Transcription:

IDAHO STATE ATV ASSOCIATION, INC. an Idaho nonprofit corporation GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING TRAIL DIFFICULTY [adopted August 8, 2015]

U The following represent the official guidelines for determining trail difficulty, adopted by a three-fourths majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Idaho State ATV Association, Inc., an Idaho nonprofit corporation ( ISATVA ), at its annual membership meeting held August 8, 2015. The guidelines set forth herein may be amended, modified and/or deleted from time to time by the members of the Board of Directors of ISATVA upon approval of three-fourths of its members. These guidelines are binding upon all members of ISATVA. Drafting Committee These guidelines were developed by a committee consisting of the following: North Idaho Representative Thomas Leo, Panhandle Riders (Committee Chair) Southwest Idaho Representative Steven Huffman, Boise ATV Trail Riders Southeast Idaho Representative none UTV Representative Haden Claiborne, Idaho UTV IDPR Representative Troy Elmore Board Representatives David P. Claiborne (President), Carl Bloomquist (Vice President of Membership), Rusty Faircloth (Treasurer) Ultimately, these guidelines were deliberated among and approved by three-fourths of the members of the Board of Directors of ISATVA at the 2015 annual membership meeting. Every club member has one vote on the Board of Directors. Applicable Policies These guidelines are intended to implement and advance the following policies and positions of ISATVA, as duly adopted and approved by the members of ISATVA. Policy 1.09. Support of Tread Lightly. ISATVA supports the Tread Lightly program, which can be found at HUwww.treadlightly.orgUH. ISATVA encourages its clubs, members, sponsors and supporters to abide by the guidelines suggested by Tread Lightly with respect to OHV recreation. Policy 1.10. Support of Stay on Trails. ISATVA supports the Stay on Trails program, which can be found at HUwww.stayontrails.com UH. ISATVA encourages its clubs, members, sponsors and supporters to abide by the guidelines suggested by Stay on Trails with respect to OHV recreation. 2 Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Idaho State ATV Association, Inc.

Policy 2.05. Trail Signing. ISATVA supports the clear, obvious and apparent signing and marking of OHV trails on the ground. ISATVA encourages responsible authorities to create logical trail numbering systems to assist OHV users in finding and staying on designated trails, and including such trail numbers on signs posted in the field. ISATVA encourages responsible authorities to post trail system maps at trailheads that display to OHV users the trail system, mileage, points of interest and trail difficulty. ISATVA is dedicated to the advancement of OHV trail signing in the State of Idaho, and its surrounding areas, through volunteer assistance and support of sign placement. ISATVA encourages its clubs, members, sponsors and supporters to generously volunteer their time and effort toward the assistance and support of sign placement. Policy 2.06. Trail Difficulty. ISATVA supports the establishment of a national uniform system for indication of OHV trail difficulty. ISATVA encourages responsible authorities to support the same and use such a system in trail signing and mapping. ISATVA encourages its clubs, members, sponsors and supporters to support the development of a trail difficulty categorization system by riding OHV trails to determine difficulty and by advising OHV users of trail difficulty. Trail difficulty classification should be determined by experienced riders who have been trained as trainers as part of the IDPR OHV education program. Trails should be classified according to the most difficult terrain expected on the route section. Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Goal: Trail difficulty needs to be determined by implementation of objective criteria. Trail difficulty rating will assist riders as they travel and recreate throughout the State of Idaho. Riders will be able to look at trail difficulty ratings to provide predictions as to the conditions they might expect on the trail. 3 Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Idaho State ATV Association, Inc.

Criteria and Scoring: The following criteria and scoring shall be employed to determine the overall rating of trail difficulty: Trail Rating Chart Characteristic Least Difficult More Difficult Most Difficult Comments Point Value (0 points each) (5 points each) (10 points each) Purpose of Ride Fun Sport Challenge Rider Experience Needed Novice General/Sport Technical Ride Distance < 40 mi. 40-80 mi. 80 + mi. Average Speed 15 mph 20-25 mph 10-15 mph Maximum Speed 25 mph 30 mph 35 + mph Grades Mild Moderate Steep (less than 15 ) (15-30 ) (over 30 ) Side-hills None Mild Moderate (less than 5 ) (5-15 ) (over 15 ) Recommended Rider Age Family 16 + Adult Exposure Minimal Expect a few Adversities Higher than average potential for falling exists 2WD/4WD 2WD 4WD Likely 4WD Required Total Points Control at high speed, side saddling, front/rear braking based on incline, etc. Short trails may be difficult, but that is accounted for in other rating criteria Average speeds of 10-15 indicate technical challenges Mud, rocks, boulders, snow, ice, water, loose surface, drop offs, narrow trails, potential for falling. GRAND TOTAL 4 Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Idaho State ATV Association, Inc.

Determination of Difficulty: The grand total score using the above criteria and scoring will determine the trail s difficulty based on the following 0-20 points, is a Least Difficult trail; 21-55 points, is a More Difficult trail; and 56+ points, is a Most Difficult trail. The following symbols shall be used to designate a trail s difficulty: Symbols: The above symbols describe the trail (as opposed to the rider s experience or machine). Members can use these symbols in their ride schedules so riders can quickly identify the type of ride being offered. Graphics for each symbol are available at ISATVA s website. Who Determines a Trail Rating: Trail difficulty ratings shall be determined by local riding clubs that are members of ISATVA. The rating should be determined by the member club located closest to the subject trail, or whose members most often use the subject trail. Within the local member club, the local member club shall rely upon two or more expert riders to determine a trail s rating and the rating shall be approved by the local member club s board of directors. Common sense should be employed in rating a trail and if a trail rates as least difficult when the rating club knows it is not, a higher rating should be assigned. 5 Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Idaho State ATV Association, Inc.

Publication and Use of Trail Rating: Once a trail has been rated by a local club member, all club members who promote or inform riders of the use and/or availability of the trail shall also promote and inform riders of the trail s difficulty rating, including use of the symbols approved herein. Every member of ISATVA shall exclusively use these guidelines and ratings for trail difficulty rating purposes. No other system of ratings shall be used by any ISATVA member. If a trail has not been rated using these guidelines, the trail should be indicated as Not Rated. Implementation and Education: ISATVA encourages its members to immediately implement these guidelines. Effective January 1, 2016, every member of ISATVA should implement and abide by these guidelines on a trial basis for review and consideration at the 2016 annual membership meeting of ISATVA. The executive board of ISATVA, or its designees, shall endeavor to attend a meeting of each local club on or before the 2016 annual membership meeting to educate the local club of these guidelines and receive additional input. Rely on these Guidelines at Your Own Risk: Use of the criteria in this guide provides no assurance of safety or trail conditions. Trail conditions, rider experience, and weather, among many other circumstances, are variables that can only be determined by actual riders while in the field on any given day. Ultimately, the rating and safety of a ride is the responsibility of each rider and operator. Document Updated: 9/9/2015 6 Guidelines for Determining Trail Difficulty Idaho State ATV Association, Inc.