Case Study Explosive Detection PEDs/IEDs
Case Study: Explosive Detection - PEDs/IEDs Moderator Anne-Marie Pellerin, Managing Partner, LAM LHA Security Innovation Panelists Sonia Hifdi, Chair, ICAO IED Task Force Steve Karoly, Acting Assistant Administrator, ORCA, TSA Cameron Mann, Global Market Director, Aviation, Smiths Detection
2017 IATA AVSEC World Acting Assistant Administrator Steve Karoly Office of Requirements and Capabilities Analysis 1
Explosive Detection and Operational Challenges TSA faces challenges in detecting explosive threats across all platforms. To combat this, the Agency has established a System of Systems view to close the gap in detection. 1,200,000 Checked bags a day. 2,000,000 Passengers a day. 5,000,000 Carry-on items a day. We face an intelligent and adaptive adversary. With threats evolving constantly, we must think outside the box to enhance the future of aviation security for years to come. 2
Aviation Security as a System This visual looks at the Aviation Security System through a lens of Aviation Security as a System, specifically for the passenger journey. Passenger Journey (Notional) Flight Reservation, Secure Flight Vetting Credential Authentication Passenger Screening Gate Boarding In Cabin, FAMS, FFDOs Participating Partners Key TSA Airport Arrival Terminal Queuing Checked Baggage Screening 3
Aviation Security as a System of Systems This visual looks at the Aviation Security System through a lens of Aviation Security as a System of Systems, specifically for the passenger journey. Passenger Journey (Notional) Flight Reservation, Secure Flight Vetting Credential Authentication Passenger Screening Gate Boarding In Cabin, FAMS, FFDOs Participating Partners Key TSA CBP Airport Arrival Terminal Queuing Checked Baggage Screening LEO Airline Airport 4
Aviation Security Architecture Information Hierarchy The aviation security architecture will leverage capabilities across TSA to enable the flow and use of risk and operational information to proactively adapt to emerging threats through a comprehensive view of the security landscape. Intel & Vetting Key Goals: 1. Enable transparency through data-sharing across the aviation ecosystem National & International 2. Proactively adapt to emerging threats through a comprehensive view of the security landscape Airport 3. Enhance collaboration across the aviation ecosystem Enterprise Other DHS Intel Agencies Risk (CBP, FAA) Sharing Ticket Purchase & Vetting Perimeter/ Local PD Behavior Detection Check-in External AOC/TSOC STIP/ Data DOMAIN Airport Infrastructure Passenger Screening Canine Teams Checked Baggage System Baggage Screening Local Risk Engine Coordination Centers FAMS/ FFDO Checkpoint System Screening Systems TSE Modularization 5
Screening Technology and Equipment Current State Passenger and baggage screening equipment highlighted below are used to screen passengers at the Checkpoint. Passenger Screening Credential Authentication Technology (CAT) Explosives Trace Detection System (ETD)* Walk-Through Metal Detector (WTMD) Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) Baggage Screening Checked Baggage Inspection System (CBIS) Advanced Technology X-ray (AT) Explosives Detection System (EDS) Bottled Liquids Scanners (BLS) *May be used for baggage screening as well 6
Innovation Task Force Technology Demonstrations In the past year, ITF has achieved many successes, including the demonstration of four distinct solutions in partnership with stakeholders across the transportation security ecosystem. ITF is in the process of planning demonstrations for five additional solutions. Current Solutions Future Solutions Automated Screening Lanes (ASL) Mobile Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) Computed Tomography (CT) High-throughput Bottled Liquid Scanner (BLS) Biometric Authentication Technology (BAT) TDC Automation with egate and mobile app Checkpoint Planning & Staff Allocation Enhanced Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) Colorimetric Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) 10 7
Notional Future State of a Checkpoint 8
Focus On Aviation Security - IED s Evolving Threats November 2017
Discussion Framework > Evolving Threats > How is regulation adapting > Implications for Hold Baggage Screening operations > Implications for checkpoint operations > What does this mean for airports? Where are the opportunities?
Focus On Changing Threat - INTERNAL -
Changing Threats Insider threat: Daallo Airlines Flight 159 2nd February 2016 (Mogadishu Somali en route to Djibouti City) Metrojet Flight 9268 31st October 2015 (Sharm El Sheikh International Airport Egypt, en route to Pulkovo Airport Saint Petersburg, Russia) Complex Concealment: Sydney meat mincer plot August 2017 Electronics in the Cabin ban for US and UK bound flights from ME March 2017
How is the regulation changing Hold Baggage Screening Both ECAC/EC and TSA have established regulatory standards and defined processes for manufacturers to undergo a certification process. TSA is a 3 step process: TSL detection performance testing passing this means the solution is certified (but not approved for use in by the TSA) TSIF operations & integration testing OT&E in field test and evaluation passing means the solution is both certified and approved for use and can be procured by the TSA ECAC/EC: Defined set of standards where manufacturers apply for test slots and are allocated to one of the EDS test laboratories for the conduct of the test passing means the system is qualified against the standard and can be used as a compliant solution. Increased focus from both agencies to harmonize the standards and to work with industry on providing higher levels of performance which are reflected in the standard.
ECAC/EC AND TSA CERTIFICATIONS HOLD BAGGAGE SYSTEMS Non-EDS EDS Standard 2 EDS Standard 3.0 EDS Standard 3.1 EDS Standard 3.2 TSA 5.8 TSA 7.1 TSA 7.2
ECAC/EC AND TSA CERTIFICATIONS HOLD BAGGAGE SYSTEMS Non-EDS EDS Standard 3.0 EDS Standard 3.1 EDS Standard 3.2 TSA 5.8 TSA 7.1 TSA 7.2
How is the regulation changing - Checkpoint TSA & DHS currently have 4 streams of effort to define the future for checkpoint screening standards which will be CT based: APSS (Accessible Property Screening System), working to define a checkpoint CT standard and program of record by Feb 2019. AT/CT, to accelerate the qualification of CT to AT-II to get systems on the QPL by the middle of Q4 FY18 (Jul 2018) for procurement under the AT-II program of record. DHS (S&T) BAA s, CT technology development ITF (Innovation Task Force) CT integration, working to demonstrate and define integration requirements for CT into the ASL and Ingress/Egress Systems. Outcomes at the end FY18 to feed into the APSS Program. ECAC Defined EDS CB C1, C2, C3, and C4 standards ECAC is currently conducting qualification testing for technologies for Standards C1 to C3. Products currently qualified at C1, and C2. Likely to see first C3 products on the ECAC list before the end of the year.
ECAC/EC AND TSA CERTIFICATIONS CABIN BAGGAGE SYSTEMS Single View Systems Multi-View Systems CT Systems Non-EDS EDS CB C1 EDS CB C2 EDS CB C3 EDS CB C4 TSA AT-2 TSA AT-3 TSA Checkpoint CT
Opportunities for Airports Checkpoint Opportunities: Early in-field experience Upgrade of existing multi-view platforms Changing to CT for operational benefits (when considering all implications) HBS Opportunities: Platform approach Consider best fit for airport Throughput requirements Infrastructure constraints Footprint Tunnel size
Trusted Experience Partner of Choice Deep Integration Experience Hold Baggage Screening Checkpoint Solutions Air Cargo Solutions Extensive Supplier Networks 40+ years of experience in aviation security 4000+ HBS 3000+ multi-xray 28 STANDARDS dans le 24500 référentiel ETDs interne de Santé, Sécurité au travail Experience et with Environnement ECAC, TSA, CAAC 90%+ world s top 50 busiest airports rely on our equipment 1000+ networked solutions Over 1,500 HBS and 2,000 checkpoint systems sold in the Americas 2,000 HBS and 2,000 checkpoint systems sold in EMEA 500 HBS and 700 checkpoint systems sold in APAC
Focus On Questions Cameron Mann Global Market Director - Aviation
Case Study Explosive Detection PEDs/IEDs