Quarterly report Year 1, Quarter 4 January to March 2017

Similar documents
GUIDANCE SHEET - ALTERNATIVE SUPPORT ARRANGEMENTS

Nursing Revalidation May 2017

UKPHR Revalidation. Frequently Asked Questions for Employers. What is the value of my employee being registered with UKPHR?

Revalidation of UKPHR s registrants: Guidance

BACN Guide to Revalidation. Introduction

Independent evaluation of revalidation for Nurses and Midwives

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism. VisitBritain Research, August 2018

The Royal College of Nursing response to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) evaluation of the revalidation pilots

Revalidation: lessons learned and reflections for the future. Una Lane Director Registration and Revalidation

Visit Wales Research Update

Domestic Tourism to South West Wales in 2006, 2007 and 2008 Factsheet

UKPHR Revalidation. Frequently Asked Questions for Registrants

Tourism to the Regions of Wales 2008

The GMC protocol for making revalidation recommendations: Guidance for responsible officers and suitable persons Fifth edition (March 2018)

Revalidation: data from the first five years

Understanding Business Visits

Pharmacists Defence Association Response to the General Pharmaceutical Council s Consultation on Revalidation for Pharmacy Professionals

Regulating through Revalidation: Initial Impact, Emerging Findings and Future Evaluation

CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Update on implementation of Taking Revalidation Forward recommendations

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

UK Revalidation System:

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Perth & Kinross Council. Community Planning Partnership Report June 2016

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

NatWest UK Regional PMI

NAURU BUREAU OF STATISTICS

Civil Aviation Authority: UK Aviation Consumer Survey. Key Findings. Autumn 2018

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

Key purpose Strategy Assurance Policy Performance

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

% change vs. Dec ALL VISITS (000) 2,410 12% 7,550 5% 31,148 1% Spend ( million) 1,490 15% 4,370-1% 18,710 4%

Performance of Tourism Accommodation January September 2018p

BUSINESS BAROMETER December 2018

EXPO 88 IMPACT THE IMPACT OF WORLD EXPO 88 ON QUEENSLAND'S TOURISM INDUSTRY QUEENSLAND TOURIST AND TRAVEL CORPORATION GPO BOX 328, BRISBANE, 4001

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Revalidation Information for ARCP/RITA panels, Heads of School, Training Programme Directors

NHBC NEW HOME STATISTICS REVIEW Q3 2017

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

Construction Industry Focus Survey. Sample

Reflection on near miss incidents: a tool for clinical oncologists and clinical radiologists

Kent Business Barometer December 2018

SURVEY OF U3A MEMBERS (PART 1)

Insight Department: Scotland The key facts on tourism in 2016

STRIVING FOR CONTINUING COMPETENCE

Revalidation. Update. What will doctors need to do? How will it work? When will it be introduced? How will patients be involved?

FOREWORD KEY HIGHLIGHTS... 3

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

Taking Part 2015/16: WEST MIDLANDS

February 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

Activities in Britain s nations and regions

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

LONDON HIGHER FACTSHEET 2011

2017/ Q1 Performance Measures Report

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

UK household giving new results on regional trends

National Rail Performance Report - Quarter /14

Report of Sir Keith Pearson s review of revalidation. Una Lane, Director, Registration and Revalidation

PEMBROKESHIRE & CORNWALL VISITOR SURVEYS 2011/12 COMPARING THE DESTINATIONS. February 2013

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Revalidation: Recommendations from the Task and Finish Group

Guernsey Travel Survey

July 2016 Employment and Skills Briefing

Visit Kent Business Barometer: July 2017

The impact of investments & storms on the economic benefits provided by the South West Coast Path National Trail to the region between 2010 and 2014

Over 5,000 consumers in GB England, Wales and Scotland

Revalidation: initial consultation

The Traffic Management Act (TMA) 2004 and roadworks; and lane rental under the New Roads and Streetworks Act (1991) in England

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Spokane Real Estate Market May Provided by Windermere Valley & Liberty Lake

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

Queenstown Airport International Passenger Profile Update

Market Monitor. Half Year Review

The impacts of proposed changes in Air Passenger Duty

East Dunbartonshire Area Profile

National Rail Performance Report - Quarter /16 (January-March 2016)

Implementation of Revalidation for Nurses and Midwives NI. 14 November 2014, 1.30pm. Room E402, Castle Buildings

Permanent IT Salaries Q Working with you to create a great recruitment experience

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

Hertfordshire Business Barometer September 2018

Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics

Devonport-Takapuna Local Board Profile

VisitScotland Scottish Accommodation Occupancy Survey October to December Quarterly Report

Aviation Trends Quarter

Employment characteristics of UK tourism industries in 2008

Employment and Skills Briefing (March 2015)

Aviation Trends. Quarter Contents

2019 Vacation Bidding

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Economic Impact of Tourism. Cambridgeshire 2010 Results

BROMLEY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP INDIVIDUAL FUNDING REQUESTS ANNUAL REPORT

NHS Lanarkshire Corporate Communications Report January to March 2018

UK Occupancy Survey. for serviced accommodation

Transcription:

Quarterly report Year 1, Quarter 4 January to March 2017

FOREWORD Welcome to the final quarterly report for the first year of revalidation. As with the previous three quarters we continue to see a positive picture with 93 percent of those due to renew maintaining their registration through revalidation. This continues to compare well with historical averages for renewal. I am delighted that we are ending the first year of revalidation on the same positive note that we began last April. None of this would have been possible without the work and commitment of all our partners and the nurses and midwives who have embraced revalidation and shared their experiences with us and our evaluation partners. We look forward to being able to publish our first year review of revalidation alongside an independent evaluation report in July. Emma Broadbent Director of Registration and Revalidation 2

CONTENTS 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Introduction The big picture Revalidation summary table Number due to renew vs. number revalidating Revalidated by registration type Number due to revalidate by country number revalidating Number revalidating Revalidation through exceptional circumstances Lapsed registrations 3

INTRODUCTION Revalidation is the new process that all nurses and midwives in the UK need to follow to maintain their registration with the NMC. Taking effect from April 2016, nurses and midwives are required to meet a range of requirements that help demonstrate they are practising safely and effectively in line with the Code. To make sure we monitor and continually improve revalidation, we have committed to reporting quarterly and annually on how the process is going. The annual report will provide more insight into areas such as scope of practice, reasons for lapsing, work setting, employment type, appraisals and verification. It will also give information on the numbers of nurses and midwives with protected characteristics going through revalidation. This quarter saw our second peak in March with more people due to revalidate than in most other months (although this number is not as high as our September peak of over 50,000 nurses and midwives). As with September, we are seeing that a higher number of people due to revalidate correlates with a higher renewal rate. This is particularly the case in March for Wales and Northern Ireland, where we have seen renewal rates of 96 percent and 97 percent respectively. The other feature of this quarter is a lower proportion of midwives in the population of those due to renew. However there is no evidence that midwives are lapsing at a higher rate than nurses. We continue to see a pattern of changes to registration type. As in the past three quarters, the majority of the changes to registration type are dual registrants who lapse one of their registrations. 4

Finally, the data does not include nurses and midwives who submitted a revalidation application but by the end of their renewal month had not had their revalidation application fully processed. Reasons for this may include: going through the process of verification, declaring cautions and convictions, declaring a determination from another regulator, or being subject to fitness to practise sanctions. We welcome your feedback, as well as suggestions on what additional information would be useful. For more information please contact: Sara Kovach Clark, sara.kovach-clark@nmc-uk.org 5

THE BIG PICTURE January TO MARCH 2017 The fourth quarter of revalidation shows that the number of nurses and midwives revalidating is in line with our expectations and similar to the patterns of registration renewal we have seen in the past six years. During this period, 48,598 nurses and midwives renewed their registration. In the four UK countries, average revalidation rates were very similar, ranging from around 93% to 95%. The proportion of nurses and midwives revalidating by country was: England 80% Scotland 10% Wales 5% Northern Ireland 3% From outside the UK 1% The percentage lapsing in the four UK countries was likewise similar, ranging from around 4% to 7%. 6

Figure 1: Revalidation summary table This table summarises the numbers and percentage of nurses and midwives who revalidated with the NMC during the period January March 2017. Month England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Not practising in UK *** Jan 2017 Number due to revalidate* 11,124 1,544 462 398 381 13,909 Number (percentage) who revalidated** 10,426 (93.7%) 1,444 (93.5%) 427 (92.4%) 371 (93.2%) 209 (54.9%) 12,877 (92.6%) Feb 2017 Number due to revalidate 12,207 2,133 520 360 352 15,572 Number (percentage) who revalidated 11,539 (94.5%) 1,993 (93.4%) 490 (94.2%) 318 (88.3%) 190 (54.0%) 14,530 (93.3%) Mar 2017 Number due to revalidate 17,910 1,708 1,760 924 460 22,762 Number (percentage) who revalidated 16,777 (93.7%) 1,548 (90.6%) 1,682 (95.6%) 894 (96.8%) 290 (63.0%) 21,191 (93.1%) Number due to revalidate 41,241 5,385 2,742 1,682 1,193 52,243 Number (percentage) who revalidated 38,742 (93.9%) 4,985 (92.6%) 2,599 (94.8%) 1,583 (94.1%) 689 (57.8%) 48,598 (93.0%) * Includes all nurses and midwives who were sent a formal notice to revalidate for January, February or March 2017 (Figure 4). ** Includes all nurses and midwives who revalidated, including through the exceptional circumstances process (Figure 5). *** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). This table does not include nurses and midwives who submitted a revalidation application but by the end of their renewal month had not had their revalidation application fully processed. Reasons for this may include that: they were going through the process of verification, had declared cautions and convictions, had declared a determination from another regulator, or were subject to fitness to practise sanctions. 7

Figure 2: Number due to renew vs. number revalidating This chart shows the number of nurses and midwives due to revalidate and the number who actually revalidated, broken down by country. 45,000 40,000 35,000 41,241 38,742 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 5,385 4,985 2,742 2,599 1,682 1,583 1,193 689 England 93.9% Scotland 92.6% Wales 94.8% N. Ireland 94.1% Non-UK 57.8% (overseas and EU) For each country, the light coloured bar represents those who were due to revalidate, and the dark coloured bar represents those who actually revalidated. 8

Figure 3: Revalidated by registration type * (after revalidation) This chart shows the number and percentage of nurses and midwives who revalidated broken down by registration type after revalidation. 1,698 (3.5%) Midwives (including SCPHNs) 563 (1.2%) Nurses and midwives (including SCPHNs) 46,337 (95.3%) Nurses (including SCPHNs ** ) 48,598 (100%) * This is a nurse or midwife s registration type after their registration is renewed, partially renewed or lapsed. ** A specialist community public health nurse (SCPHN) is a registered nurse or midwife who is also registered in the Specialist Community Public Health Nurses part of the register. 9

Figure 4: Number due to revalidate * by country This table shows the number of nurses and midwives due to revalidate broken down by country. Registration type ** before revalidation England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Not practising in UK *** Nurse 37,494 4,945 2,500 1,541 1,093 47,573 Midwife 1,281 180 68 54 44 1,627 Nurse and midwife 614 55 50 26 29 774 Nurse and SCPHN 1,771 192 119 61 22 2,165 Midwife and SCPHN 46 11 3 - - 61 Nurse, midwife and SCPHN 35 2 2-4 43 41,241 5,385 2,742 1,682 1,193 52,243 * Includes all nurses and midwives who were sent a formal notice to revalidate for January, February or March 2017. ** This is a nurse or midwife s registration type before their registration is renewed, partially renewed or lapsed. *** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). 10

Figure 5: number revalidating This table shows the total number of nurses and midwives who revalidated with the NMC in this quarter. It includes both those who went through the standard revalidation process (Figure 6) and those who completed our exceptional circumstances process (Figure 7). The number of nurses and midwives revalidating is in line with what we would expect to see and is in line with the same period in previous years. There continues to be a pattern of dual registrants choosing to lapse one registration. As with the previous period the majority lapsed their nursing registration to become midwives. Registration type after revalidation * England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Not practising in UK ** Nurse 35,260 4,565 2,372 1,455 632 44,284 Midwife 1,300 191 72 56 20 1,639 Nurse and midwife 435 29 36 17 19 536 Nurse and SCPHN 1,676 190 116 55 16 2,053 Midwife and SCPHN 46 10 3 - - 59 Nurse, midwife and SCPHN 25 - - - 2 27 38,742 4,985 2,599 1,583 689 48,598 * This is a nurse or midwife s registration type after their registration is renewed, partially renewed or lapsed. ** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). This table does not include nurses and midwives who submitted a revalidation application but by the end of their renewal month had not had their revalidation application fully processed. Reasons for this may include that: they were going through the process of verification, had declared cautions and convictions, had declared a determination from another regulator, or were subject to fitness to practise sanctions. 11

Figure 6: Number revalidating (excluding those with exceptional circumstances) This table shows the number of nurses and midwives who revalidated through the standard revalidation process. It excludes those who renewed their registration through our exceptional circumstances process. Registration type after revalidation * England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Not practising in UK ** Nurse 35,055 4,534 2,360 1,449 628 44,026 Midwife 1,293 191 71 56 20 1,631 Nurse and midwife 429 29 36 17 19 530 Nurse and SCPHN 1,663 190 116 54 16 2,039 Midwife and SCPHN 46 10 3 - - 59 Nurse, midwife and SCPHN 25 - - - 2 27 38,511 4,954 2,586 1,576 685 48,312 * This is a nurse or midwife s registration type after their registration is renewed, partially renewed or lapsed. ** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). This table does not include nurses and midwives who submitted a revalidation application but by the end of their renewal month had not had their revalidation application fully processed. Reasons for this may include that: they were going through the process of verification, had declared cautions and convictions, had declared a determination from another regulator, or were subject to fitness to practise sanctions. 12

Figure 7: Revalidation through exceptional circumstances This table shows the number of nurses and midwives who revalidated through our exceptional circumstances process. This includes nurses and midwives who were unable to meet the standard revalidation requirements, for example due to maternity leave or long term illness. Nurses and midwives renewing their registration by completing our exceptional circumstances process are required to meet adjusted revalidation requirements. This includes requirements for practice hours, continuing professional development (CPD), professional indemnity arrangement and a health and character declaration. Registration type after revalidation * England Scotland Wales Northern Ireland Not practising in UK ** Nurse 205 31 12 6 4 258 Midwife 7-1 - - 8 Nurse and midwife 6 - - - - 6 Nurse and SCPHN 13 - - 1-14 Midwife and SCPHN - - - - - - Nurse, midwife and SCPHN - - - - - - 231 31 13 7 4 286 * This is a nurse or midwife s registration type after their registration is renewed, partially renewed or lapsed. ** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). 13

Figure 8: Lapsed registrations This table shows the number of nurses and midwives who were due to revalidate in this quarter but who lapsed all their registrations. It does not include those holding more than one registration who elected to lapse one or more of those registrations, and retain the remaining registration(s). Registration type at the England Scotland Wales point of lapsing * Northern Ireland Not practising in UK ** Nurse 1,986 330 111 79 447 2,953 Midwife 63 7 8 3 25 106 Nurse and midwife Nurse and SCPHN Nurse and SCPHN Nurse, midwife and SCPHN 25 3-2 8 38 88 13 2 5 4 112 2 - - - 1 3 1 - - - 1 2 (Percentage of those due to revalidate who lapse) 2,165 (5.2%) 353 (6.6%) 121 (4.4%) 89 (5.3%) 486 (40.7%) 3,214 (6.2%) * This is a nurse or midwife s registration type at the point of lapsing. ** This includes nurses and midwives whose current or most recent practice (those for whom we have an employer address), or their home address is either in the EU/EEA or overseas (outside EU/EEA). 14

23 Portland Place, London W1B 1PZ T +44 20 7333 9333 www.nmc.org.uk The nursing and midwifery regulator for England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland Registered charity in England and Wales (1091434) and in Scotland (SC038362)