Validation of Integrated Safety-enhanced Intelligent flight control. Yoko Watanabe ONERA/DTIS-Toulouse

Similar documents
Research on Fault Tolerant Controls within GARTEUR

Trajectory Optimization for Safe, Clean and Quiet Flight

The organisation of the Airbus. A330/340 flight control system. Ian Sommerville 2001 Airbus flight control system Slide 1

SOFIA. Safe AutOmatic Flight Back and LandIng of Aircraft

Performance. Aircraft System

AUTONOMOUS FLIGHT CONTROL AND GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT

P310 VTOL UAV Operation Manual

March 2016 Safety Meeting

FLIGHT SAFETY Technology and the Human Factor. A pilot s perspective by Prof. dr ir J.A. Mulder Delft University of Technology

Safety in prototype flight

The role of Flight Data Analysis in the aircraft manufacturer s SMS.

Avionics Certification. Dhruv Mittal

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7. DG RTD-H.3 - Aeronautics Brussels, January 2007

Analyzing Risk at the FAA Flight Systems Laboratory

Head-up Guidance & Vision Technologies Enabling Safer and More Efficient Airline Operations

Technology that Matters

Safety Enhancement SE ASA Design Virtual Day-VMC Displays

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR 01/2012. Subject: HEAD-UP DISPLAYS (HUD) AND ENHANCED VISION SYSTEMS (EVS)

IT S NOT ALL BAD NEWS

Ground movement safety systems and procedures - an overview

Lessons Learnt From The EUROCONTROL Wake Impact Severity Assessment Flight Simulator Campaign

Advisory Circular (AC)

KEY FEATURES IN SHORT

Economics of Safety Using Situational Awareness Tools

Aeronautics & Air Transport in FP7

LESSONS LEARNED LOSS OF CONTROL AEROSPACE DESIGN WORKSHOP BEIJING, CHINA 30.NOV.2016

Federal Aviation Administration Flight Plan Presented at the Canadian Aviation Safety Seminar April 20, 2004

Business Aviation DASSAULT AVIATION & The Falcon and New development methods

To optimize Wake Vortex separations. Fabrice ORLANDI THALES AIR SYSTEMS

Airport Safety Initiative Networking Session Initiated by the Airport Safety Cluster. Helsinki, IST Event /11/ 2006,16:00-17:30

EMMA2 Introduction. EMMA2 Demonstration Day Malpensa, Michael Roeder. Internet:

Applicability / Compatibility of STPA with FAA Regulations & Guidance. First STAMP/STPA Workshop. Federal Aviation Administration

RACOON PROJECT Daniele Teotino - ENAV. RACOON Project Manager Head of SESAR JU Activity Coordination

Optimizing trajectories over the 4DWeatherCube

HEAD-UP DISPLAY (HUD), EQUIVALENT DISPLAYS AND VISION SYSTEMS

FLIGHT PATH FOR THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

UAS/NAS Forum: Technology Milestones Necessary for NAS Certification Autonomy: Relating UAS Automation to Certification

Validation Programme. Lambert Dopping-Hepenstal, FREng ASTRAEA Programme Director ICAS Workshop, 24 th September 2007

European Wind tunnel Association Two years activity (April 2004 March 2006)

Glass Cockpits in General Aviation Aircraft. Consequences for training and simulators. Fred Abbink

Towards Autoomous ISR by a Team of Coopera;ng Gliders

Research on Flight Operational Efficiency for Fuel and Noise

FINAL REPORT. of civil aviation safety investigation. No. I Date: Artem Avia, Ucraine. Genex Ltd., Belarus

Technologies for Autonomous Operations of UAVs

Index. Springer International Publishing AG 2018 I. Schagaev, B.R. Kirk, Active System Control, DOI /

RPAS-ATM Integration Demonstration

Alpha Systems AOA Classic & Ultra CALIBRATION PROCEDURES

IATA Air Carrier Self Audit Checklist Analysis Questionnaire

TERMS OF REFERENCE (Revision 9) Special Committee (SC) 213 Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems

RPAS INTEGRATION INTO EU AIRSPACE. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE On CIVIL RPAS OPERATIONS

All-Weather Operations Training Programme

HIGH SPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

LAUNCHING YOUR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT PROGRAM

Program. - Flight Operations (VRI) Motivation. The Aircraft / Sensors. Unmanned Aircraft Systems 8/1/17

Automation Dependency. Ensuring Robust Performance in Unexpected Situations Sunjoo Advani, IDT

BFC KNOWLEDGE TEST. 4. What are wing-tip vortices (wake turbulence)? With which aircraft are they the greatest? Describe proper avoidance?

Hazard Identification Questionnaire

DEMORPAS Project. Final Dissemination Forum. 10th March 2016, World ATM Congress, Madrid

del Airbus en el mundo de la

ECLIPSE 500. Aircraft Overview. Do Not Use For Flight

General Information Applicant Name and Address: Tel./Fax/ Contact Person Name/Tel./Fax/

Industria, Innovazione e Ricerca: Le nuove frontiere del volo a pilotaggio remoto

Pat Reines Avionics Support for GBAS and Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

The Technical Side: Angle of Attack indicators in Canada

RAAA Annual Convention This information is property of Embraer and cannot be used or reproduced without written permission.

Follow-the-Greens: The Controllers Point of View Results from a SESAR Real Time Simulation with Controllers

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MetroAir Virtual Airlines

(ii) Weight. Maximum gross weight for all tests, except where otherwise described in subparagraph (iii) below.

Addendum: UAV Avionics

AIRBUS FlyByWire How it really works

Human Factors of Remotely Piloted Aircraft. Alan Hobbs San Jose State University/NASA Ames Research Center

RPAS Integration in the Airspace SESAR JU demonstration activities Catherine Ronflé-Nadaud

Development and Testing of an Unmanned Aircraft Safety Beacon for Aerial Application Safety

ACAS on VLJs and LJs Assessment of safety Level (AVAL) Outcomes of the AVAL study (presented by Thierry Arino, Egis Avia)

Project Overview. FUSETRA Future Seaplane Traffic. Dipl.-Ing. Benedikt Mohr Technische Universität München

Beyond Fuel Efficiency

EE Chapter 12 Design and Maintenance of Aircraft System

ADS-B. Not just a mandate! Forrest Colliver Becker Avionics GmbH Becker Avionics GmbH All rights reserved -

FLIGHT TEST FOR TYPE CERTIFICATION ACQUISITION OF SMALL CIVIL AIRPLANE KC-100

Commit to Safety: Professional Pilots Always Use a Checklist INITIAL EQUIPMENT SETUP

ASSEMBLY 35TH SESSION PLENARY. Statements by delegations of Contracting States and of Observers INDONESIAN AIRWORTHINESS SYSTEMS

The SESAR Airport Concept

A350 XWB Flight Crew Training Concept

ENABLING GREENER FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES. David Bowen Chief of ATM SESAR JU

Federal Aviation Administration Portfolio for Safety Research and Development. Seminar Paul Krois October, 2008

Policies for Certification, operation and maintenance of UAS Andres Eduardo Parra Catama Air Safety Inspector Civil Aviation Authority of Colombia

2.1 Private Pilot Licence (Aeroplane/Microlight)

Research on Controlled Flight Into Terrain Risk Analysis Based on Bow-tie Model and WQAR Data

SOURDINE II EU- 5FW project on Noise Abatement Procedures. Overall view. Ruud den Boer / Collin Beers Department: ATM & Airports

Runway Safety Programme Global Runway Safety Action Plan

ADVANCED SURVEILLANCE IN ONE INTEGRATED PACKAGE

Lesson 1: Introduction to Flight

FLIGHT OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS AEROPLANE APPENDIX 8. FLIGHT RECORDERS

AFI Flight Operations Safety Awareness Seminar (FOSAS)

5 Day Operator Course. 1.0 AIRSPACE CLASSROOM ONLINE EXECUTIVE VO Terms X X Classification

THE MIDCAS PROJECT. Johan Pellebergs Saab Aerosystems. Keywords: UAS, Sense & Avoid, Standardization, Non-segregated Airspace

Operational Benefits, Affordability and Availability

Transcription:

EU-Japan Collaborative Research Project in Aeronautics Validation of Integrated Safety-enhanced Intelligent flight control Yoko Watanabe ONERA/DTIS-Toulouse

Basic Information Acronym: Full name : VISION Validation of Integrated Safety-enhanced Intelligent flight control Starting date : 01/03/2016 Duration : Budget : Grant no : EC call ID : Keywords : 36 months 1.8 M (EC) + 1.8 M (NEDO) (EU) EU-H2020 GA-690811 (JP) NEDO GA-628001 H2020-MG-2015_SingleStage-A MG-1.8-2015 International cooperation in aeronautics with Japan FCS Flight control system, Aircraft Avionics, Systems & Equipment AVS, Aeronautics and International cooperation Project officers : (EU) Mr. Miguel Marti Vidal(EC/INEA/Transport Research Unit) (JP) Mr. Hiroyuki Hirabayashi(NEDO) Coordinators : (EU) Dr. Yoko Watanabe(ONERA/Dept. of Information Processing and Systems) (JP) Prof. Shinji Suzuki (the University of Tokyo/School of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

Consortium EU Participants 1 ONERA Dept. of Information Processing and Systems 2 University of Exeter College of Engineering Mathematics and Physical Sciences 3 University of Bristol Department of Aerospace Engineering 4 SZTAKI Systems and Control Laboratory FR UK UK HU 5 Unmanned Solutions ES Japan Participants 7 University of Tokyo 8 JAXA Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Aeronautical Technology Directorate 9 RICOH Co. Ltd. Photonics R&D Center 10 Mitsubishi Space Software Co. Ltd. 11 ENRI Dept. of Air Traffic Management JP JP JP JP JP 6 Dassault Aviation Flight dynamics department FR

VISION Global objective Global objective Investigation, development and validation of smarter aircraft Guidance, Navigation and Control (GN&C) solutions to automatically detect and overcome some critical flight situations Increase tolerance of the aircraft auto-pilot system to flight anomalies (actuator/sensor failures) Reduce the pilot s task and stress in difficult situations Contribute to the aircraft accident rate reduction

Motivation More than half of the commercial aircraft fatal accidents occurred during near-ground operations (take-off, final approach, landing). Enhancing airplane flight safety during such critical operation phases is an important key to the accident rate reduction.

Motivation Two accident types 1) Accidents due to flight control performance failure Loss of aircraft controls due to bad weather, mechanical failures, etc. ex.) AF447 (Rio-Paris) crash in June 2009 (228 fatalities) - Airspeed indicator error due to Pitot tube icing - Pilot s incorrect reaction resulted in aerodynamic stall 2) Accidents due to navigation and guidance performance failure Lack of visibility, pilot s situational awareness ex.) OZ162 (Seoul-Hiroshima) crash landing in April 2015 (27 minor injuries) - Manual approach guidance with GNSS navigation data - Bad visibility condition with rain Needs to imorove robustness and selfadaptabilty of the current aircraft flight system to both types of failures

Motivation Onboard vision sensors Effective tool to increase the pilot s situational awareness during near- or on-ground aircraft operation ex.) Wing-tip cameras for on-ground anti-collision Fin-tip and belly cameras for taxi-aid on A380 Used for cockpit display only Not used in the flight GN&C system Significant potential of 3D Lidar and IR camera in degraded visibility condition (night, fog, etc.)

Technical Objectives Recovery from flight anomaly during the final approach phase 1) Flight control performance recovery Actuator failure (jamming, authority deterioration) Sensor failure (loss of airspeed data) 2) Navigation and guidance performance recovery Sensor failure (lack of SBAS, lack of ILS) Obstruction (object/aircraft on a runway, air traffic cut-in on the final path) Smarter GN&C technologies 1) Fault Detection and Diagnostic / Fault Tolerant Control (FDD/FTC) 2) Vision-based control surface monitoring system 3) Vision-aided local precision navigation system 4) Vision-based obstacle detection and missed approach guidance

Background Fault Detection and Diagnostic / Fault Tolerant Control (FDD/FTC) EU-FP7 ADDSAFE (2009-2012) / RECONFIGURE (2013-2016) Integrated FDD/FTC solutions Validations through pilot-in-the-loop simulations with real flight avionics Airbus s participation to define real and wide-covered fault scenarios METI-SJAC Autonomous Flight Control and Guidance for Civil Aircraft (2002-2003) / Intelligent Fault Tolerant Flight Control for Civil Aircraft (2009-2010) Integrated FDD/FTC solutions Flight validation on JAXA MuPAL-alpha aircraft

Background Vision-based guidance and navigation EU-FP6 PEGASE (2006-2009) Vision-based runway (helipad) detection and relative navigation Automatic landing guidance Evaluation through simulations with synthetic images EU-FP7 ALICIA (2009-2014) Visible / IR cameras and 3D Lidar systems for runway and obstacle detection during the taxi phase in all conditions Cockpit display only METI-SJAC Autonomous Flight Control and Guidance for Civil Aircraft (2005-2007) Online flight trajectory optimization and collision avoidance guidance Flight validation on FHI FABOT RPA

Project Aims To capitalize on both Europe and Japan s complementary research activities and experiences, as well as their industrial strengths To propose operation-oriented integrated GN&C solutions for each of the scenarios To mature the TRL of the proposed GN&C solutions by performing flight validations on real aircraft platforms To promote the collaboration between EU Japan researchers and students

EU-Japan Mutual Contribution

Organization

WP3: FDD/FTC controller designs Development of advanced FDD/FTC controllers Sliding-mode FDD/FTC (Fault Tolerant Control) controller design for aileron & rudder actuator failure (loss of efficiency) Structured H-infinity FDD/FTC controller design for aileron & rudder actuator failure (saturation, constant bias) Adaptive gain-scheduled FTC controller with online parameter estimation for FDD (Fault Detection and Diagnostic) for elevartor actuator failure (loss of efficiency) / sensor failure (loss of airspeed) Neural Network-based simple adaptive FTC controller design for actuator failures and CG shift Implementation and in-flight validation on real aircraft for raising TRL of those techniques

WP3: Flight experimental platform JAXA MuPAL-alpha aircraft Dornier Do228-200 Experimental Fly-By-Wire system Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation (HILS) setup First operation at Chofu airfield in Tokyo, Japan

WP3: Flight test campaigns First flight test campaigns (12/2016 03/2017) 3 EU partners had 2-weeks flight test sessions at JAXA C-code implementation and HIL simulation validation Preliminary flight tests (fault-free cases) 4 scientific EU-Japan joint publications Hardware-In-The-Loop Simulation (HILS) UBRISTOL + JAXA Flight test trajectory (near Tokyo, Japan)

WP3: Flight test campaigns Example of test results UNEXE: Flight test with emulated aileron & rudder actuator faults ONERA: HILS test with emulated elevator actuator fault Sideslip angle Roll angle Nominal case without failure reference measured 20% loss of efficiency Without adaptation With adaptation 50% loss of efficiency Case of 30% loss of elevator efficiency

WP3: Vision-based control surface monitoring Aileron deflection angle detection by onboard camera to assist pilots and/or FDD/FTC controller On-ground test with a camera installed on JAXA MuPAL-alpha aircraft Preliminary results of image processing aileron control surface camera Image similarity Aileron up Aileron down

WP4: Onboard vision-based navigation Development of integrated Vision/ILS, Vision/GNSS navigation system for cases of sensor failure In-flight validation on real aircraft Navigation sensors GNSS / ILS Sensor failure models Aircraft Approach Guidance & Control Integrated navigation & Integrity monitoring Onboard vision Final approach Runway detection images

WP4: Flight experiment platform «K50-Advanced» UAV platform Manufactured within the project High payload capacity (100L, 20kg) ONERA flight avionics GPS RTK (dual antennas) AHRS (Attitude & Heading Reference System) Pressure sensors Inclinometers First flight expected in Oct. 2018 Dimensions Weights Wingspan 4.00 m Max Take-off Weight 50 kg Length 3.09 m Max Zero-fuel weight 30 kg Typical Speeds at 1500m ISA and 50 kg Useful load 20 kg Dash Speed 142 km/h Take-off at 0m ISA and Flap 0º Loiter Speed 72 km/h Take-off distance 90 m Stall Speed Flap 0º 65 km/h Take-off rotation speed 79 km/h Endurance 5 hours

WP4: Obstacle detection & avoidance Development of vision-based obstacle detection and trajectory modification/go-around decision for collision avoidance Numerial simulation In-flight validation on small UAVs Aircraft Flying obstacle Flight Guidance & Control Online trajectory optimization Onboard vision Ground obstacle Final approach Obstacle detection images

WP4: Onboard vision system Stereo-vision system under the belly Monocular-vision systems under each wing First camera installation on K50 and calibration test Preliminary flight tests for image recording Preliminary validation of image processor for runway marker detection RICOH Stereo-vision Obstacle SZTAKI Monocular-vision Imitated runway markers Images taken from multi-copter (RICOH) Synthetic image Runway marker detection (SZTAKI)

WP4: K50 flight controller Approach guidance & flight controller design ILS-based approach guidance and basic flight controller design Nonlinear simulation framework Refinement of the aircraft dynamic model by flight test data and re-adjustment of the flight controller (early 2018) Final approach trajectory ILS Glide slope ILS - Localizer

WP4: Integrated navigation Integrated Vision/GNSS, Vision/ILS navigation systems with Integrity monitoring function Multi-sensor fusion by Error-State Kalman Filter (ESKF) with time-delayed measurements Tight integration of GNSS / INS / Vision Integrity monitoring function by AAIM (Aircraft Autonomous Integrity Monitoring) algorithms

Next steps System development and Flight test campaigns continue Further flight test campaigns planned to start early 2018 at JAXA for FDD/FTC algorithms validation First flight test campaign of K50 with the vision systems onboard planned in early 2018 Analysis of indurstial operational relevance Participation of Dassault aviation Invitation of EU and Japan external experts (Airbus, Mitsubishi HI, EASA, etc.) to the progress meetings Dissemination EU-Japan joint publication on the validation results EU-Japan co-organization of special session in international conferences Organization of final international workshop at the end of the project

Thank you!