FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2005 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

Similar documents
FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2007 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2010 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2013 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, VA

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2015 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, VA

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY FOR NORTH AMERICA, 2016 UPDATE

Thanksgiving Holiday Period Traffic Fatality Estimate, 2017

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Accommodation Survey: November 2009

Visitor Services Project. Colonial National Historical Park

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

2014 West Virginia Image & Advertising Accountability Research

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. hospitality compensation as a share of total compensation at. Page 1

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings

Potomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results

2016 was yet another good year for air safety.

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Mid-Coast

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Greater Portland & Casco Bay

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Ontario Arts and Culture Tourism Profile Executive Summary

Corporate Productivity Case Study

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

2013 Travel Survey. for the States of Guernsey Commerce & Employment Department RESEARCH REPORT ON Q1 2013

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

IMPACTS OF CHANGING USED IMPORT VEHICLE VOLUMES ON AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND VEHICLE FLEET SAFETY

Proof of Concept Study for a National Database of Air Passenger Survey Data

Tourism in Canadian Rockies Tourism Destination Region. A Summary of 2006 Visitor Numbers and Characteristics

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Tourism in Alberta. A Summary Of Visitor Numbers, Revenue & Characteristics Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd.

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Tourism in Alberta. A Summary Of Visitor Numbers, Revenue & Characteristics 2004

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Summary Report. Economic Impact Assessment for Beef Australia 2015

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC

Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004

Tourism in Alberta South Tourism Destination Region. A Summary of 2006 Visitor Numbers and Characteristics

2009 North Carolina Visitor Profile

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2014 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes & Mountains

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

Washington, DC 2013 Visitor Statistics

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. October 2017

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Saighton Camp, Chester. Technical Note: Impact of Boughton Heath S278 Works upon the operation of the Local Highway Network

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Airport Profile. St. Pete Clearwater International BY THE NUMBERS 818, ,754 $ Enplanements. Passengers. Average Fare. U.S.

Operational Performance

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

HEATHROW COMMUNITY NOISE FORUM

Economic Contribution of Tourism to NSW

2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.

Convention Statistics 2014

Tourism in Alberta Central Tourism Destination Region. A Summary of 2006 Visitor Numbers and Characteristics

The Economic Contribution of Cruise Tourism to the Southeast Asia Region in Prepared for: CLIA SE Asia. September 2015

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. January 2018

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Life Expectancy and Mortality Trend Reporting to 2014

Preliminary Flight Data Analysis (Lee A. Christel, Ph.D, Aug 19, 2015)

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Highlands

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. August 2018

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes & Mountains

Rates & Charges Analysis

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

Air Carrier E-surance (ACE) Design of Insurance for Airline EC-261 Claims

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: The Maine Beaches

The Economic Impact of Tourism New Forest Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2013 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Downeast & Acadia

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

1987 SUMMER USE SURVEY OF MINNESOTA STATE PARK VISITORS

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Life Expectancy and Mortality Trend Reporting

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

PRESS RELEASE SURVEY ON QUALITATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF RESIDENT TOURISTS: 2016 (provisional data)

COMPARATIVE INDICATORS TO OTHER HAMPTON ROADS CITIES. David Bradley

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

Ontario Tourism Facts & Figures

Crash and Behavioral Characteristics, and Health Outcomes, Associated with Vehicular Crashes by Tourists in Wisconsin,

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Transcription:

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2005 UPDATE Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia by National Safety Council Research and Statistical Services Group Itasca, Illinois September 2006

Preface This report presents the results of work done by the National Safety Council, Research and Statistical Services Group, under contract to the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions. It includes estimates by the Council for calendar years 2003 through 2005. The Council s work is an extension of, but independent of, the estimates made for 2001-2002 by Heiden Associates, which are included here for reference and reported more fully in the June/July 2003 issue of Injury Insights (Heiden & McGonegal, 2003). Injury Survey, 2005 Update -2-

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2005 UPDATE Since 2001 the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions (IAAPA) has sponsored an annual survey to collect and analyze ride, attendance, and patron injury data from facilities that oate fixed-site amusement rides. The IAAPA survey was undertaken to gain spective on fixed-site amusement ride injuries in the United States. The surveys include amusement and theme parks, tourist attractions, and family entertainment centers. The results of these surveys are presented below. Facilities were asked to report attendance and ridership as well as the number of patron injuries. Separate attendance-based and ridership-based analyses were formed and are shown in Table 2. To be consistent with the estimates previously reported for 2001-2002, the Survey Highlights are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Survey Highlights 2001-2002 2003* 2004 2005 Number of Facilities 459 403 403 398 Annual Attendance (millions) 302.9 300.4 300.0 300.4 Annual Ridership (billions) --- 1.95 1.81 1.82 Annual Number of Ride-Related 2,486 2,044 1,637 1,783 Attendance 8.2 7.0 5.2 5.2 *Changes in the estimating method beginning with 2003 affect comparability with the 2001-2002 survey. Table 2 indicates that the ridership-based estimates of ride related injuries compared to attendance-based estimates are 70 lower in 2005 (1,713 vs. 1,783), 11 higher in 2004 (1,648 vs. 1,637), and 90 lower in 2003 (1,954 vs. 2,044). This level of agreement is good considering not all facilities were able to report both attendance and ridership and therefore there were differences in the selection of facilities used in each analysis. The distributions of injuries by ride type and severity obtained from the ridership-based estimates are very similar to the distributions obtained from the attendance-based estimates. Table 2. Attendance-Based vs. Ridership-Based Injury Estimates, 2003-2005 2003 2004 2005 Attendance-Based Annual Number of Ride-Related 2,044 1,637 1,783 Attendance 7.0 5.2 5.2 Ridership-Based Annual Number of Ride-Related 1,954 1,648 1,713 1.0 0.9 0.9 Obviously ridership is a better measure of exposure to risk than attendance because injuries on rides is what is being analyzed. Parks with similar attendance may have much different ridership numbers because of differences in the number and kinds of amusement rides provided. The results reported below are based on the ridership analysis, which is shown in Table 3. This analysis provides additional results that were not available from the 2001-2002 survey. The estimated injury total is up 3.9% in 2005 compared to 2004 (1,713 vs. 1,648). The rate of injuries million patron-rides remained unchanged at 0.9. Compared to 2003, both the estimated number of injuries and the rate in 2005 were down. The decrease in the injury rate million patron-rides from 2003 to 2004 (1.0 to 0.9) is statistically significant. As shown in Figure 1, about two thirds of the injuries in 2005 occurred on family and adult rides compared to about one half in 2004 and three fifths in 2003. Roller coasters accounted for 22.8% of the injuries in 2005 about the same as in 2003 but down from more than one third in 2004. associated with children s rides decreased from 14.2% in 2003 to 13.3% in 2004 and 11.2% in 2005. Injury Survey, 2005 Update -3-

Figure 1. Proportion of By Ride Type, U.S., 2003-2005 2003 2004 2005 25.8% 14.2% 13.3% 22.8% 11.2% 37.2% Children's Family & Adult Roller Coasters 60.0% 49.5% 66.0% In 2005, the injury rate for family and adult rides was 1.0 million patron-rides, compared to 0.9 for roller coasters and 0.8 for children s rides. Although similar in magnitude, the difference between the injury rate for children s rides and family and adult rides is statistically significant as is the difference between the injury rates for family and adult rides and roller coasters. However, the difference between the children s and roller coaster injury rates is not statistically significant. About 7.7% of the injuries were reported to be serious, which means an injury that results in immediate admission and hospitalization in excess of 24 hours for purposes other than medical observation. The remaining 92.3% were other than serious. The proportion of injuries that were serious in 2005 was less than in 2004 but more than in 2003. The rate of serious injuries million patron-rides remained at 0.1 for all three years. Table 3. Summary of Fixed-Site Amusement Ride-Related, U.S., 2003-2005 (based on ridership) 2003 2004 2005 Characteristic Number of Percent Number of Percent Number of Percent Total 1,954 100.0% 1.0 1,648 100.0% 0.9 1,713 100.0% 0.9 Children s 277 14.2 1.2 219 13.3 1.0 192 11.2 0.8 Family and Adult 1,173 60.1 1.0 806 49.5 0.8 1,131 66.0 1.0 Roller Coasters 504 25.8 1.0 613 37.2 1.2 390 22.8 0.9 Total 1,954 100.0% 1.0 1,648 100.0% 0.9 1,713 100.0% 0.9 Serious 106 5.4 0.1 132 8.0 0.1 132 7.7 0.1 Other Reportable 1,848 94.6 1.0 1,516 92.0 0.8 1,582 92.3 0.9 Source: National Safety Council estimates based on 2003-2005 fixed-site amusement ride injury surveys. Note: Totals may not equal sum of parts due to rounding. Survey Response Of the 398 eligible facilities in 2005, 130 provided some or all of the data requested. Response was similar in 2003 and 2004. Forty-eight of Amusement Business s Top 50 North American Parks are in the United States. Fortysix of the 48 reported in 2005. This is a slight increase from 2003 and 2004 when 44 of the 48 reported. The respondents used in the analyses represented about 63% of the estimated total annual attendance and about 64% of estimated total rides taken at all facilities. Data from 117 facilities were used for the 2005 attendance-based estimates compared to 124 for 2004 and 111 for 2003. Data from 90 facilities were used for the 2005 ridership-based estimates compared to 99 for 2004 and 90 for 2003. It was impractical to find a single set of facilities that reported all data (attendance, ridership, and injuries) for all years as that would have reduced the reliability of the estimates. Injury Survey, 2005 Update -4-

Differences with NEISS National statistics on fixed-site amusement ride injuries are also available from annual reports issued by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC; e.g., Levenson, 2005). However, the IAAPA survey and the CPSC estimates are based on different definitions, data sources, and methodological approaches so direct comparisons are not appropriate. The CPSC s annual injury estimates are derived from emergency department injury reports from about 100 of the nation s more than 5,000 hospitals that have emergency department facilities and participate in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). The system is designed to track injuries that are generally distributed across the U.S. population, such as those associated with bicycling, lawn mowers, and garage doors. However, [b]ecause fixed-site injuries occur in a relatively small number of locations, the sites of amusement and theme parks, the number of recorded injuries in NEISS depends to a large degree on the geographical closeness of the NEISS hospitals to the parks. Thus, the utility of NEISS for estimating fixed-site ride injuries may be limited (Levenson, 2003). Nevertheless, the CPSC estimated that there were 3,400 (95% confidence interval 2,000 to 4,800) fixed-site ride injuries in 2004 that were treated in hospital emergency departments (Levenson, 2005). 2003-2005 Methodology The National Safety Council conducted the survey using a master list of amusement/theme parks, family entertainment centers, and tourist attractions thought to have fixed-site rides. The master list was prepared in consultation with IAAPA and Amusement Industry Consulting, Inc. The survey consisted of a notification letter, a package of reporting information mailed one week later, and a follow-up postcard mailed one week after the reporting package. After the mailings, IAAPA volunteers made follow-up telephone calls and sent e-mails to IAAPA member facilities and some nonmember facilities. Injury rates based on the reporting facilities were used to estimate national totals. (See also Survey Response above.) 2001-2002 Methodology In 2001 and 2002 IAAPA mailed survey questionnaires to members previously identified as having fixed-site amusement rides. IAAPA retained Heiden Associates, Washington, DC, to analyze the survey results. Using the IAAPA survey results and other data, Heiden Associates estimated the number of U.S. facilities with one or more fixed-site amusement rides and the injury totals and rates. References Heiden, E.J., & McGonegal, S. (2003). 2001-2002 fixed-site amusement ride injury survey analysis. Injury Insights, June/July 2003. Levenson, M.S. (2003). Amusement ride-related injuries and deaths in the United States: 2003 update. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Levenson, M.S. (2005). Amusement ride-related injuries and deaths in the United States: 2005 update. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Injury Survey, 2005 Update -5-