Quality of Life Study

Similar documents
STUDY PROCESS. Study. PHASE I Research. PHASE II Develop & Analyze Options. PHASE III Recommendations. Regional Transit

Development of SH119 BRT Route Pattern Alternatives for Tier 2 - Service Level and BRT Route Pattern Alternatives

TransAction Overview. Introduction. Vision. NVTA Jurisdictions

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INTRODUCTION

Creating Sustainable Communities Through Public Transportation

A Public Transportation Review Evaluating Metro s Operational Efficiency, Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

Presentation to the DRCOG Board August 16, 2017

TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS

2018 Service Implementation Plan Executive Summary

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Planning for RAV: Lon LaClaire, Transportation Engineer Anita Molaro, Development Planner CITY OF VANCOUVER

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Managed Lanes, Transit Access, and Economic Development: Implementing the Region s First Highway BRT Corridor

A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #6

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Go Local Fixed-Guideway Program History and Project Update. PowerPoint 3

New System. New Routes. New Way. May 20, 2014

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Minnetonka Transit Study Peer Review Metropolitan Council

Director King County Department of Transportation. King County Department of Transportation

Service Performance 2012 Networked Family of Services

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Colorado Department of Transportation The Role of State Departments of Tr of T ansportation

Appendix 4.1 J. May 17, 2010 Memorandum from CTPS to the Inter Agency Coordinating Group

Link Union Station (LINK US)

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

STATION TYPOLOGIES. Typology Matrix 35

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

8 CROSS-BOUNDARY AGREEMENT WITH BRAMPTON TRANSIT

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

Tolling in Washington State. Craig J. Stone, P.E. Assistant Secretary, Toll Division

Rails with Trails Finding the mobility, safety, and liability sweet spot 5/10/2017

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

WELCOME PUBLIC MEETING NORTHWEST RAIL ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION

Assessment of Travel Trends

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

Service Performance 2017 Networked Family of Services

2015 Independence Day Travel Overview U.S. Intercity Bus Industry

Travel Time Estimates

Access Across America: Transit 2014

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

Sound Transit. Tunnels and Underground Structures Committee January 24, 2011

Westbrook Station. Transit Oriented Development Opportunity

Silver Line Operating Plan

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Figure 1: Little Dry Creek Trail Crossing

The Atlanta Streetcar: Laying the Tracks for a Better Future

Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority Community Bus Plan

August 2014 Passenger and Cargo Traffic Statistics Reno-Tahoe International Airport

Title VI Service Equity Analysis

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

GoTriangle Short-Range Transit Plan Final Report November 2018

CENTRAL OREGON REGIONAL TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Edward R. Sajecki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

(This page intentionally left blank.)

I-95 Transit/ TDM Study. LRTP Advisory Committee Meeting June 22, 2017

Capital Metro. Capital Metro 30/04/2015. Gungahlin to the City (Flemington Road & Northbourne Avenue) Route:

Score. Category. Access Aesthetics Community Resources

Caroline County / King George County Transit Studies. Meeting November 1, 2017

West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Community Meetings March 12, 13, 17 & 19, 2018

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Monthly Employment Watch: Milwaukee and the Nation's Largest Cities

These elements are designed to make service more convenient, connected, and memorable.

September 28, :15 pm MDT

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Table of Contents. TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE i

Parking Rates & Policies Survey. December 2013

THE WORLD BANK Washington, DC

I-95/395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Project Overview

East Farmingdale Fire Department 930 Conklin Street. Source: Parsons Brinckerhoff

The Boulder (and Boulder County) Experience. June 6 th, 2017 RTD s Pass Program Working Group 2 nd Meeting

Major US City Preparedness For an Oil Crisis Which Cities and Metro Areas are Best Prepared for $4 a Gallon Gas and Beyond?

Oakland A s Gondola Economic Impact

City of Austin Department of Aviation Austin Bergstrom International Airport 2040 Master Plan. Public Workshop #2 April 19, 2018

2040 Regional Transit Element Adopted August 6, 2015

2017 TBARTA Future Regional Priority Projects Adopted by TBARTA Board, December 9, 2016

BaltimoreLink Implementation Status Report

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

The Benefits of a Whittier Blvd. Alignment for the Metro Eastside Extension

BALLAST CLEANING TO IMPROVE DRAINAGE IN METROLINK S VALLEY SUBDIVISION TUNNEL 25

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

BRANSON WINDMILL INN 2425 W. STATE HWY. 76, BRANSON, MISSOURI A HOSPITALITY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS PROPERTY SUMMARY

Updating the vision for regional transit

CRCOG Northwest Corridor Transit Study. Summary of Existing Conditions June 11, 2008

meeting, focusing instead on making sure everyone participating in the meeting has an opportunity to be heard.

National Transportation Safety Board Recommendation and FAA Air Traffic Orders

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Rapid Transit From Arbutus Street to UBC. Policy and Strategic Priorities Council Meeting January 30, 2019

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

Regional Planning for Tri-Rail Coastal Link

Puget Sound Trends. Executive Board January 24, 2019

transportation + demographics = opportunity

The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York

Transcription:

FasTracks: Quality of Life Study Transportation Systems Performance Measurement Conference May 19, 2011

Overview Quality of Life Study Background/Purpose Study Scope Reporting Example Measures 2

RTD Regional authority operating transit in eight counties o Funded by sales & use tax o 15-member Board of Directors o 2,300 sq. mile service area Family of services to meet diverse needs of the region o 35 miles of light rail o 150 fixed bus routes 3

FasTracks Program In 2004, Denver region voters passed a 0.4% tax increase to fund regional transit expansion FasTracks Program: o 122 miles of new commuter and light rail o 18 miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) o 21,000 new parking spaces at rail and bus stations ti o Enhanced bus service to facilitate bus/rail transfers across the 8-county district 4

Study Background In the 2004 FasTracks Plan, the RTD Board adopted three core goals for FasTracks: o Balance transit needs with future regional growth o Increase transit mode share during peak travel times o Provide improved transportation choices and options The Plan also outlined anticipated benefits to the region How do we know the FasTracks Program is achieving these goals and providing benefits? 5

QoL Study: What Is It? Quality of Life (QoL) Study is a multiyear FasTracks monitoring program with the primary goal to: o Objectively track and measure how the region changes as FasTracks is planned, constructed and opened for service The Study also serves to fulfill the Before and After Study data requirements for corridors receiving Federal New Starts funding 6

Summary of Study Measures * High Level measures are shown in bold. 7

Summary of Study Measures * High Level measures are shown in bold. 8

Study Scope Study measures the effects of the FasTracks Program at three geographic levels: o Region o Rapid transit corridors o Rapid transit station areas Only representative stations used for station area data collection 9

Reporting Detailed Reports o 2006: First report established a baseline of data for full set of 70+ measures o Detailed reports issued every 3 to 5 years High Level Measures reports o Issued annually between detailed reports o Provides updates on a subset of 11 measures 10

Example Measures 11

Provide Opportunities for Development Near Transit Taxable Retail Sales Within the District Economic Activity Critical measure of the economic strength of the Denver region General increase between 2004 & 2007 Significant decrease associated with economic recession has continued into 2009 $37 $36 (Billions) Taxable Retail Sales $35 $34 $33 $32 $31 $30 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 12

Provide Opportunities for Development Near Transit Economic Activity Completed Development Near Rapid Transit Stations New development within ½ mile of existing and future rapid transit stations Completed development is a lagging indicator as projects were started several years earlier Majority of development completed in 2009 occurred downtown and along the Southeast Corridor 13

Provide Opportunities for Development Near Transit Property Values Property Value The total property value for ½ mile station areas as a price per square foot US 36/Northwest Rail Corridor shows higher property values at stations as compared to the surrounding area US 36 BRT/Northwest Rail Property Values $35 $35 $30 $30 $25 $25 $20 $20 $15 $15 $10 $10 $5 $5 $0 Downtown Louisville Boulder Transit Village Downtown Longmont US36/104th BRT Flatirons Crossing $0 US 36 Sub Area 2006 2008 14

Transit Usage Annual Transit Boardings per Capita 29% increase in transit 38 ridership between 36 2000 & 2009 34 Significant increase in transit boardings between 2006 & 2007 with the opening of the Southeast Corridor light rail Boardings per Ca apita Boardings dropped 40 between 2008 and 30 20 2009 90 80 70 60 50 10 40 32 30 Annual Boardings per Capita Ridership 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Peer Cities Review Boardings per Capita Dallas Denver Minneapolis Portland Sacramento Salt Lake City San Jose Seattle 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 15

Travel Safety & Security Crime Rate on RTD Property Crime Downward trend observed 1.20 between 2004 & 2009 100 1.00 Decrease of approximately 30% between 2008 & 2009 0.80 Light rail crime rate 060 0.60 decreased by 46% and bus crime rate decreased 0.40 by 19% between 2008 & 020 0.20 2009 00,000 Boardings Crimes per 1 0.00 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 16

System Mobility Corridor Travel Times Travel time to reach downtown Denver during the AM peak period Automobile travel time increased on both corridors Transit travel time decreased on both corridors Southeast Corridor light rail improved transit travel in the southern I-25 corridor by reducing travel time by 15 minutes Southeast:Lincoln Southwest:Mineral Southeast:Lincoln Southwest:Mineral Travel Times AM Peak Automobile Travel Times to Downtown Denver 2006 2009 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 AM Peak Transit Travel Times to Downtown Denver 2006 2009 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 17

System Mobility Travel Time Variability Additional time required to arrive on time at downtown destination during AM peak period Refinement to travel time variability method shows an overall increase in automobile travel time variability West:JeffCo Govt Center Travel Time Variability 2009 AM Peak Automobile Travel Time Variability to Downtown Denver Northwest Rail:Longmont US 36 BRT:Table Mesa Southwest:Lucent Blvd Southeast:RidgeGate North Metro:120th Ave I 225:Aurora City Center Gold Line:Ward Road East:DIA West:JeffCo Govt Center Northwest Rail:Longmont Travel ltime (min) Variability (min) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2009 AM Peak Transit Travel Time Variability to Downtown Denver US 36 BRT:Table Mesa Southwest:Lucent Blvd Southeast:RidgeGate North Metro:120th Ave I 225:Aurora City Center Gold Line:Ward Road East:DIA Travel Time (min) Variability (min) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 18

Travel Choices & Accessibility Destination Access Regional Destinations Served by High-Frequency High Frequency Service Area Transit High-frequency transit service area o ½ mile radius of rail stations o ¼ mile radius of bus stops with 15-minute or better peak & off- peak headways 30% of Denver s regional destinations are served by high- frequency transit o 25% prior to opening of Southeast Corridor light rail 19

Travel Choices & Accessibility Population within Walking Distance of Representative Stations Transit Access Half mile walkshed used versus half mile radius Walkable streets include all roadways except limited access freeways ½ mile walkshed at Belleview Station 20

Travel Choices & Accessibility Transit-Supportive Zoning Changes Land Use Zoning changes around existing and future rapid transit station areas that increase densities & encourage mixed use development 10 stations ti had zoning changes in 2006 & 2007 Louisville station zoning changed in 2008 No transit-supportive zoning changes in 2009 21

Challenges & Opportunities Long Term Performance Monitoring Program Transferring academic research to an agency o Quantity of data o Presenting results to non-technical audience New data sources and methodologies o Clear about program goals o Decide when to change or remain consistent o Housing + Transportation Costs Objectivity o Correlation not causation o Partnerships 22

Questions Lacy Bell, PE P.E. Senior Transportation Planner RTD FasTracks 303 299 2341 Lacy.Bell@rtd fastracks.com 23