LA IMPORTANCIA DE LAS ASOCIACIONES PUBLICO PRIVADAS EN EL DESARROLLO PORTUARIO XXXIX REPICA, JULY 25-28, 2017, BELIZE CITY, BELIZE Jorge Durán Chief of the Secretariat Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) jduran@oas.org #OAS_CIP #OEA_CIP www.portalcip.org
Member States 1. Antigua and Barbuda 2. Argentina 3. Bahamas 4. Barbados 5. Belize 6. Bolivia 7. Brazil 8. Canada 9. Chile 10. Colombia 11. Costa Rica 12. Cuba 13. Dominica 14. Ecuador 15. El Salvador 16. Grenada 17. Guatemala 18. Guyana National Port Authorities 19. Haiti 20. Honduras 21. Jamaica 22. Mexico 23. Nicaragua 24. Panama 25. Paraguay 26. Peru 27. Dominican Republic 28. St. Kitts and Nevis 29. St. Vincent and the Grenadines 30. St. Lucia 31. Suriname 32. Trinidad and Tobago 33. United States 34. Uruguay 35. Venezuela
CIP Structure CIP Structure Mexico CIP Secretariat Barbados Uruguay Tourism, Inland Ports and Waterways, Ship Services and Navigation Safety Logistics, Innovation and Competitiveness Sustainable Port Management and Environmental Protection Port Protection and Security CSR, Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women Public Policy, Legislation and Regulation Argentina Panama Mexico United States Peru Uruguay
Inter-American Committee on Ports(CIP) 1. l 2. C 3. A 4. P Political Dialogue Only permanent inter-governmental forum at the highest level to promote the development of the maritime sector in the region. Capacity Building Promote and improve management and technical capabilities of port officials. Technical Assistance Assist Member States on issues or specific projects upon request. Active Collaboration with the Private Sector Promote win - win partnerships with private sector in the maritime industry to develop projects.
Associate Members
Strategic Partners
It is determined by the cost, speed and efficiency of each one of the factors and processes that are used by trading in the logistics corridor. Competitiveness In Ports, what is Competitiveness?
Member States Competitiveness is the set of institutions, policies and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country. Innovation Business Sophistication Market Size Technology Readiness Financial Market Development Labor Market Efficiency Goods Market efficiency Training and Higher Education Health and Primary Education Macroeconomic Environment Infrastructure Institutions 90 80 93 80 88 79 83 100 102 113 115 127 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Source: WEF Competitiveness Index 2015 2016
Source: WEF Competitiveness Index 2016 2017 Global Competitiveness Map 2016-2017
Global Logistic Performance 2016 The LPI analyzes 160 Countries in areas such as Customs, Infrastructure, Logistics Competence, International Shipments, among others. Country LPI Ranking Germany 1 USA 10 Canada 14 Panama 40 El Salvador 83 Costa Rica 89 Nicaragua 102 Guatemala 111 Honduras 112 Bahamas 78 Source: World Bank, 2016
Port Infrastructure Quality 2016 Country Quality Panama 6.3 USA 5.7 Canada 5.5 Honduras 4.6 El Salvador 4 Guatemala 3.9 Costa Rica 3.1 Nicaragua 2.8 Source: World Bank, 2016
Port Ranking in Latin America and the Caribbean Millions of TEUs #1 Santos: 3. 64 #2 Colon: 3.57 #3 Balboa: 3.29 #4 Cartagena: 2.60 #5 Manzanillo: 2.45 Source: ECLAC
Panama Canal Expansion However, vessels of 16, 18 and 20 thousand TEUs do not fit Vessel Design: Capacity: 14.000 TEU Tonnage: 157.000 DWT Total Longitude: 365.8 m Bao: 48.8 m Draft: 15.2 m
Infrascope 2017 Infrascope measures a country s ability to mobilize private investment in infrastructure through PPPs.
Concession Agreement Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal High cost to optimize and expand the KCT and dredge the navigation channel. Expansion plans by competitors; investment needed to maintain and grow business. Other developments in the International Shipping Industry. Project Funding
Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal The Outcome Win Win
Privatization of the Kingston Container Terminal Jamaica investing US$ 660 million to become a Regional Logistic Hub
Mexico National Infrastructure Program 52 Highways 80 Roads 3 Passenger Trains 1 New Airport in CDMX ~83 Billions USD 1 Telecom Network 25 Port Projects
Mexico National Infrastructure Program Investment in the National Infrastructure Program (by type of investment in millions of Mexican Pesos) The Program consider 25 port expansion/improvement projects with an investment of more than 62 billion Mexican Pesos (USD $ 3.7 billion). Investment [VALUE] [VALUE] Private Sector (75%) Fiscal Resources (13%) Own Resources (12%) [VALUE]
Mexico National Infrastructure Program Ensenada 2.62 6.37 7.11 Guaymas 6.92 12.36 17.55 Topolobampo 5.39 12.89 18.81 Matamoros* Mazatlán 3.27 8.72 12.16 Puerto Vallarta Manzanillo 26.60 42.34 44.77 Lázaro Cárdenas 29.10 38.09 47.49 Altamira 15.21 26.17 36.26 Tampico 5.82 13.69 18.88 Tuxpan 12.17 24.76 31.88 Veracruz 20.89 30.26 46.03 3.86 7.14 8.72 Seybaplaya* Isla del Carmen* Dos Bocas Coatzacoalcos 8.16 27.80 45.65 30.71 45.86 56.24 Salina Cruz 10.66 17.11 22.42 Puerto Chiapas 0.56 1.43 3.03
Other PPPs Samples Costa Rica: Concession Agreement for Moin Container Terminal Concession agreement for the design, planning, financing, building, exploitation and maintenance of the new Puerto Moín Container Terminal in Costa Rica. The project involves the Government of Costa Rica, APM Terminals Moín S.A. and APM Terminals Central America B.V. Honduras: Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal Management Trust Agreement for the Structuring, Development and Financing of the Operation of the Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal between the Comisión para la Promoción de Alianzas Públicas- Privadas (COALIANZA), Empresa Nacional Portuaria (National Port Company) and Banco Financiera Comercial Hondurena S.A. (FICOHSA BANK). Source: World Bank, 2016 Honduras: Puerto Cortés Bulk Cargo Terminal Management Trust Agreement for the Structuring, Development and Financing of the Operation of the Puerto Cortés Container and Cargo Terminal between the Comisión para la Promoción de Alianzas Públicas- Privadas (COALIANZA), Empresa Nacional Portuaria (National Port Company) and Banco Atlantida S.A.
Port Community System/ Single Window Cyber Security risk at each step/institution due to more Automated Processes
Final Considerations The private sector is the main catalyst for change. Treat the private sector as a partner: private sector are the solutions. PPPs critical for sustainable development. Cooperation is essential for progress. Countries should consider: A coherent PPP policy with directions, responsibilities and goals; Strong enabling institutions; Legal Framework; Cooperative risk sharing and mutual support. Focus on a concrete deliverables that is in everyone's interest, a Win Win partnership; A confident investment and business climate. More transparency and accountability in the development PPPs. Developing strong, well-functioning maritime transport infrastructure is a key element of economic growth. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in ports have become a means to manage port operations more effectively.
Thank You! Jorge Durán Chief of the Secretariat Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) jduran@oas.org Inter-American Committee on Ports (CIP) #OAS_CIP www.portalcip.org