Industry Day CANSO Phil Stollery Chair CANSO Environment Workgroup Bretigny 25 September 2007 1
Introducing CANSO Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation Global Trade Association for ANS providers Open to all aviation industry players Founded 1997, based in Amsterdam Worldwide 45 Full & 36 Associate Members 2
CANSO in the Aviation Industry IATA Airlines ATC Airports ACI ICAO CANSO 3
CANSO Members Serve 61% of world airspace Control 84% of world air traffic Handled 44 million flights in 2006 4
CANSO Members Septem September 2007 7 5 CANSO Offices
CANSO Members September 2007 Aena - Spain AEROTHAI - Thailand Airports Authority of India Airservices Australia Airways New Zealand ANS - Czech Republic ATNS - South Africa ATSA - Bulgaria Austro Control - Austria Avinor - Norway AZANS - Azerbaijan Belgocontrol - Belgium CAA Uganda DFS - Germany DHMI - Turkey DSNA - France EANS - Estonia ENAV SpA - Italy FAA - USA HungaroControl Zrt. - Hungary Irish Aviation Authority ISAVIA - Iceland Kazaeronavigatsia - Kazakhstan LFV - Sweden LGS - Latvia LPS - Slovak Republic Air Navigation Service Providers LVNL - the Netherlands MATS - Malta MoldATSA - Moldova NAMA - Nigeria NANSC - Egypt NATS - UK NAV CANADA NAV Portugal Naviair - Denmark OACA - Tunisia Oro Navigacija - Lithuania Poland Airports / PATA ROMATSA - Romania Sakaeronavigatsia Ltd - Georgia Serco skyguide - Switzerland Slovenia Control SMATSA - Serbia UkSATSE Ukraine Adacel Inc. Airbus ARINC ATCA - Japan Aviation Advocacy Sarl Barco Orthogon AG Boeing Booz Allen Hamilton Comsoft GmbH Department of Defence (USA) DSE Airport Solutions Era Corporation ESR Technology Aviation FREQUENTIS AG Helios Technology HITT Traffic Ifield Computer Consultancy Ltd. Indra Sistemas Integra Industry Stakeholders Intelcan Technosystems Inc. Jeppesen L-3 Communications ESSCO Lochard Ltd Lockheed Martin The MITRE Corp. - CAASD PA Consulting Group A/S Park Air Systems AS QinetiQ Quintiq Raytheon SELEX Sistemi Integrati S.p.A. Sensis Corporation SITA SkySoft-ATM Sun Microsystems, Inc. Thales ATM 6
CANSO: Main Goals & Objectives 1. Influence the Global ATM Community: Regulators - ICAO, Regional & National Authorities Customers Civil & Military operators Stakeholders - Staff, Suppliers, Airports, etc. 2. Improve Global ANS Performance Advocate Best Practice in ATM provision 3. Maintain an efficient organisation 7
CANSO Environment workgroup Voluntary Code of Practice for ANSPs Climate Change Noise and Local Air Quality En-route Airspace Design and implementation Increase awareness of Env. Issues in ANSP s Engage and influence the debate, local, regional and international Understand and seek to reduce Env impact of ANSP organisation Communication to stakeholders 8
CANSO Requests PANS-OPS Compliance with ICAO Doc 8168 Tools to support the Environmental Assessment Process 9
CANSO Requests Data Model Quality of background data (e.g.: AEM3, BADA, Boeing) Improved flexibility for complex routes 10
CANSO Requests Comparative study between noise models Enhance INM ANCON etc. 11
Thank You For more information www.canso.org 12
13 Fallback Slides
Alexander ter Kuile Secretary General ATC Maastricht 2006 14
Air Traffic Management = Evil Is highly in-efficient, fragmented and unhelpful Wastes US$12 Billion of aviation fuel each year Is responsible for all contrails,, noise and emissions Offers insuffient airspace capacity to airlines ANSPs have no concern for the environment. 15
Air Traffic Management = Responsible CANSO Members = Environmental Code of Practice ce Most fuel efficient ficient routings in air & on ground Optim timising ising flight profiles with RVSM, RNP Reducing vertical separation to improve capacity Reducing airborne a holding & CDA approaches In 2006 US$ 662 Million fuel savings and 6 Million tons of CO2 Developing tools & technology for future benefit Collaborative Decision Making for Safety / Environment 16
The real Issue = Political / Institutional Fragmentation drives airspace in-efficiencies 17
18
The Lagos Curve - Filed FPL-Routing DNMM-OMDB 19
Most western/eastern AUSOTS Flex Track Routing DXB-SYD 20FEB05 2692NM 01JUL05 20
21
The real Issue = Sovereignty & Security One Airspace: 193 states with 233 civil/military ANSPs States maintain notion of One State = One ANSP Overriding national defense & security questions No incentives to raise environmental performance Civil/Military coordination and overall airspace design Absence of environmental standards & measures 22
ATM & Environment = Trade-Offs Costs, Capacity, Environment, Safety & Social impacts Noise Fuel burn Airport capacity vs vs vs Emissions Time, Speed, Costs Fuel, Emissions, Noise Airspace capacity vs Emissions trading vs Contrails Weather, Traffic, Military 23
Environment Management System CANSO works on producing an EMS template for ANSPs Primary Goal : To improve Environmental performance of delivered service and business activities. Main room for improvement is in the integration of ENV criteria and metrics in procedures and routes design 24
Environment Assment and Tools Changes in procedures and routes improve capacity, which - in return - positively impact environment Current Method and tools to design procedures and tool (PANS-OPS, Simulation) take into account Environment criteria empirically Suites of tools (integrated or not) already support design tasks. They potentially could provide the necessary data (e.g.: based on fuel consumptions) 25
PANS-OPS User Needs Compliance with ICAO Doc 8168 Aircraft Operations should be reached (but deviations should be possible!) Environment tools should support the Environment Assessment Process They should fit existing environments (design, simulation, playback, analysis) 26