Moving Ahead? Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway. Produced by SEDA-Council of Governments. c e n t r a l. p r o j e c t. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n

Similar documents
Other Principle Arterials Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

Route 29 Solutions Projects

4. Safety Concerns Potential Short and Medium-Term Improvements

Dusty Boots Unit II. Available Parcels and Informational Summary

Section 106 Update Memo #1 Attachment D. Traffic Diversion & APE Expansion Methodology & Maps

FNORTHWEST ARKANSAS WESTERN BELTWAY FEASIBILITY STUDY

State aims to cure accident-plagued South Jersey interchange

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

Frequently Asked Questions on the Route 29 Solutions Improvements Projects

A. From I-68 in Monongalia County, West Virginia to SR 6119 in Fayette County, Pennsylvania 1

We ve been working to position the region to benefit from the Dulles expansion capacity. I ll touch on just a few of the items.

PURPOSE AND NEED (CONCURRENCE POINT 1) NEW CANADA ROAD PROJECT FROM STATE ROUTE 1 (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) TO U.S. INTERSTATE 40

McLean Citizens Association Transportation Committee Project Briefing

Finchley and Golders Green Area Committee 27 April 2017

A VISION FOR I-95. January 12, Delaware Department of Transportation

Public Informational Meeting

chapter - Hex Highway Touring Route Hamburg to Strausstown Overview

PERTH-ADELAIDE CORRIDOR STRATEGY

A CASE FOR COMPLETING THE JORDAN RIVER PARKWAY: A

N4 Carrick-on-Shannon to Dromod Road Project. 2.1 Introduction

SUPPORT THE ROUTE 58 PPTA: A Good Investment in Virginia

CHAPTER 4 -- THE LAND USE PLAN: DESCRIPTIONS AND POLICIES FOR THIRTEEN PLANNING AREAS

This section evaluates the projected traffic operations and circulation impacts associated with the proposed upgrade and expansion of the LWRP.

AGENDA ITEM 5 D WAKULLA ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE (WEI) TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY

Project Location MP A44.5 MP A38 PRELIMINARY. A A57 (Future Project) A42 - A44.5 (Fall Fall 2019) A38 - A42. A31 - A38 - In Design

AGENCY NAME TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE-EVALUATION

Basic Project Information

Mission Statement. Spur 601 Project Highlights

Southern Beltway Projects Summary

9 CONSTRUCTION OF BATHURST STREET FROM GREEN LANE WEST TO SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 11, TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY AND TOWNSHIP OF KING

Launceston and Tamar Valley Traffic Vision

2008 DEKALB COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN (UPDATE)

5.1 Traffic and Transportation

6. HIGHWAY MATTERS A. U.S. ROUTE 58 CORRIDOR STUDY

Arlington County Board Meeting Project Briefing. October 20, 2015

Construction underway. STATUS: 229 5,190 5,419 5,305 STIP REFERENCE #FR /01/2013

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER

FHWA P/N Guidelines. Corridor Relationship. Highway 22 Segment 1 - US 169 to CSAH 2 Relevance / Documentation of Need

PennDOT Interstate Work next week March 30-April 3:

REVIEW OF THE STATE EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT POOL

Blackburn Road Blackburn Level Crossing Removal. Frequently Asked Questions August 2014 GENERAL

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

Alternatives Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2017 POLICY DOCUMENT. M1 Action Plan. Putting Queenslanders First

Rural Rustic Road Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 P age

diversifying modes of transportation will

Guide for Permits Development adjacent to Provincial Highways

PULLMAN-MOSCOW REGIONAL AIRPORT Runway Realignment Project

4 VIVA PHASE 2 YONGE STREET - Y2, AND HIGHWAY 7 - H3 CORRIDORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING UPDATE

3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY

South East Traffic Solution

Area of Potential Effect Report

Business Growth (as of mid 2002)

The Belfast Manifesto

SUMMER VILLAGE OF SILVER SANDS. Municipal Development Plan

Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District. Corpus Christi Harbor Bridge

I-75 in Hamilton County Project Termini

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

A number of goals were identified during the initial work on this Big Lake Transportation Plan.

U.S. 33 Ravenswood Connector

2006 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC PROFILE. June 15, 2007

BACKCOUNTRY TRAIL FLOOD REHABILITATION PROGRAM

%g 109 %g 9. %g 99. %g 9. %g 4. %g 4 %g ,95 (/ 1. Route 109 Corridor Study. %g 35. Corridor Study Area Study Area. Sanford.

Dallas Executive Airport

Exit 148 (Quantico) to Exit 133 (Route 17/Fredericksburg)

CONGESTION REPORT 1 st Quarter 2018

Update on the I-680 Transit Corridor Improvement Project HOV on/off Ramps Environmental Impact Report Community Engagement Plan

Lafourche Parish Government REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS. Landscape Architectural Services

LENOIR COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN: APRIL 2018 MUNICIPAL AND COUNTY PRESENTATIONS. 2. Recommendations

Research Report Agreement T4118, Task 24 HOV Action Plan HOV ACTION PLAN

U.S. ROUTE 202 SECTION 300 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT East Whiteland Township Tredyffrin Township Chester County

CONTACT: Michelle T. Holland

Map 1.1 Wenatchee Watershed Land Ownership

Guide to. Road Construction Projects

Minutes May 14, 2018 Monday, 4:30 p.m. Chairman Donald Bowman called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.

Airport Planning Area

FORT WASHINGTON OFFICE CENTER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS By Orth-Rodgers & Associates, Inc., Adrienne Eiss, PTP August 8, 2008

FOR LEASE - RATES STARTING AT $ NNN

Lansdowne Wetton BRT Public Transport Corridor Trunk Route: Planning Analysis

For Immediate Release Christine Girardin January 19, 2018 SUMTER COUNTY FLORIDA S TURNPIKE AND I-75 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS

SCOPE Chapter 2D shall Apply to Any Road or

Business Case Approved. Under Construction. Business Case Approved. Under Construction

Chapter 4.0 Alternatives Analysis

C. APPROACH FOR IDENTIFYING THE BEST ROUTES FOR THE NEEDED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS

THRESHOLD GUIDELINES FOR AVALANCHE SAFETY MEASURES

Transportation TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS

Greater Shepparton City Council Planning Scheme Amendment C192 and C193 VicRoads Submission to Traffic Conclave

I-95 WIDENING INCLUDING THE INTERCHANGES AT I-4 AND US 92 DESIGN-BUILD

5 Rail demand in Western Sydney

M621. Junctions 1 to 7 Improvement scheme. Share your views

CALIFORNIA HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE DEGRADATION ACTION PLAN

The US 69 Corridor - Challenges and Opportunities at a Glance

"This is the catalyst we've been waiting for," Norristown Planning Director Jayne Musonye said of the project.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Marti Donley; Daniel Reese; Rodney White UPC FFY14 TIP AMD pdf

FAQ: HR 799 & S. 403: North Country National Scenic Trail Route Adjustment Act

Transcription:

Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway Moving Ahead? c e n t r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t 2009 Produced by SEDA-Council of Governments

Bottleneck Safety hazard. Major impediment to North-South travel through Central Pennsylvania. Call it what you will, the roadway network located at the heart of the Central Susquehanna Valley challenges thousands of drivers every day, both local residents and those who live elsewhere. The solution is the Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway. The Need... 1 The Golden Strip...2 Borough of Northumberland...3 Traffic Volume...4 Where is the Traffic Coming From?...5 Growth and More Traffic...6 The Proposal and Project Update... 7 The North Section and New Bridge...8 The Route 61 Connector and South Section...9 What has been Accomplished?...9 Funding the CSVT Project...10 Adding CSVT to the Appalachian Development Highway System...10 Momentum to Proceed...11 In and Out of Hibernation...11

1 The Need W atch for deer as you travel U.S. Route 15 from New York into Pennsylvania. Watch for forests green in the summer; shades of orange in fall. And watch for the Susquehanna River, the natural landmark that defines this region. South of Selinsgrove, the land opens up, displaying rolling countryside, farmland, and pastures. Wide skies embrace you as you cross into Maryland. But before you get to Selinsgrove, in and around Shamokin Dam, just about where the Susquehanna s North and West branches join, slow down and be real careful. The congestion will force you to lower your speed, but watch for the cars ahead of you. Some will be turning, heading for home or the shopping center. Others will be changing lanes, trying to get around those tractor trailers whose numbers seem to increase daily. Welcome to the Central Susquehanna Valley and a roadway network that can barely meet the region s current needs, and will never accommodate the growth that s to come. A Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway (CSVT) is critically needed. Approximately 12-miles long, it would address traffic concerns: Along Routes 11 & 15, between the Selinsgrove Bypass and Tedd s Landing restaurant in Shamokin Dam, where the two routes divide; Along Route 15, for approximately four miles north of the divide; In the Borough of Northumberland, particularly the intersection of Route 11 (Water Street) and PA Route 147 (Duke Street); and Along Route 147, extending approximately four miles beyond Northumberland. Traffic from Route 11 and Route 15 comes together in Shamokin Dam.

2 The Golden Strip This 3.5-mile stretch of Routes 11 & 15 was originally a three-lane roadway when constructed in 1944. It was widened to four lanes in 1959, and reconfigured in 1982 when a fifth, continuous left turn lane was added. Retailers and restaurants of every type line the highway today, mixed in with several houses. Concentrations of private homes are found to the east and west, just one or two blocks away. The Susquehanna Valley Mall opened along 11 & 15 in 1978, spurring additional development, then undergoing a major expansion in 1997. There are over one hundred driveways directly accessing the strip. There are side roads 24 of them intersect the highway between the Bypass and Tedds Landing. Maintenance on the strip is almost continuous. The surface has been repaired, removed, replaced. Lanes have been widened, drainage improved, and underground utilities relocated. Where possible, curbs and shoulders have been added. But all the repairs and modifications cannot disguise the fact that a 3.5-mile stretch of road, intended to serve the area s housing and shopping needs, has become the major thoroughfare through the Central Susquehanna Valley. Local traffic, slowing, stopping, turning, competes with fast-moving throughtraffic truckers, anxious to deliver their goods in New York; families on their way to see relatives in Maryland; long-distance commuters traveling to jobs in Harrisburg. Cars and trucks jockey for position on Routes 11 & 15.

3 Borough of Northumberland As they drive through Shamokin Dam, a substantial number of trucks proceed north on Route 11, across the Blue Hill Bridge and into Northumberland. Many are headed to the Milton Industrial Park just off PA Route 147. Others, bound for Interstate 80, do not want to challenge the curvature and elevation of Route 15, and prefer to access I-80 via Route 147. In either case, Route 147 has essentially become part of the Route 15 corridor. PennDOT surveys found that twice as many trucks use Route 147 as use Route 15. Accessing Route 147 in Northumberland necessitates a left turn from Water Street (Route 11) to Duke Street (Route 147). As one would expect to find in any small town, the intersection is surrounded with homes and local businesses. The streets aren t particularly wide, basically constructed only to meet the needs of the community. Now, however, there are tractor-trailers, often more than one, waiting to make a left turn. Sometimes a car can squeeze by on the right. But when two or three trucks are in the intersection, the cars and other trucks line up behind them, stretching across the Blue Hill Bridge. Southbound trucks entering Northumberland on Route 147 find the limited access two-lane highway has quickly become a local street of stores and homes with free access and residential traffic, slowing, stopping, and turning. As is the case with the Golden Strip, heavy truck traffic combined with local vehicles results in motorist confusion and potential safety hazards. Trucks on the Blue Hill Bridge, waiting to enter Northumberland where more traffic tie-ups await them.

4 Traffic Volume Traffic amounts vary, based on land use, time of day, and other factors. These figures for average daily traffic are presented in a range of low to high. They are drawn from the full Needs Study Area. The proposed CSVT is the single largest economic development project in the history of the greater Susquehanna Valley. The Greater Susquehanna Valley Chamber of Commerce remains committed to securing the long term funding needed for the CSVT to become a reality. Charlie Ross, President/CEO Greater Susquehanna Valley Chamber of Commerce All Traffic Volume in the Central Susquehanna Valley 1996 2000 (unless noted) 2006 (unless noted) U.S. Routes 11 & 15 The Golden Strip 29,750-42,100 34,000-38,073 38,836-48,000 U.S. Routes 15 From U.S. 11 to PA 45 15,950-18,000 18,198-23,539 18,340-35,575 U.S. Routes 11 Borough of Northumberland 13,100 16,234 15,540 (estimate) Truck Traffic Volume in the Central Susquehanna Valley 1996 2000 2006 (unless noted) (unless noted) U.S. Routes 11 & 15 3,300-5,100 2,740-3,427 3,495-3,840 The Golden Strip U.S. Routes 15 2,000-2,200 1,819-3,060 1,473-3,039 From U.S. 11 to PA 45 U.S. Routes 11 Borough of 1,400 2,532 2,606 (estimate) Northumberland Traffic Volume Sources: CSVT Environmental Impact Statement and PennDOT Roadway Management System.

5 Where is the Traffic Coming From? Just as no man can serve two masters, a quality roadway cannot adequately handle high volumes of two distinct types of traffic. But that s the task of the highway network now serving the Central Susquehanna Valley. Over 50% of the cars and over 90% of the trucks traveling in the Valley do not have an origin or destination within the Valley. What s more, 71% of the traffic in Northumberland, in the vicinity of the Blue Hill Bridge, has no origin or destination within the Borough. The conflict between through and local traffic is the greatest contributing factor to unsafe road conditions in the Central Susquehanna Valley. Local drivers want unrestricted access to stores, restaurants, and other services and facilities along our highways. Those driving through the Valley want to maintain a high speed, and not be interrupted by stop lights, cross traffic, or drivers slowing down to make a turn. Too often, the result is a rear end collision. Look at a road map of Pennsylvania and it is easy to see how the Route 15 corridor fits into an integrated transportation scheme for people and goods entering and leaving Central Pennsylvania. Look at that map more closely, and it is easy to see how the Valley is the lone remaining bottleneck North and south of us, the corridor is marked by thick red lines denoting a modern, divided limited-access highway..then it becomes a little red trickle of a line between Selinsgrove and Shamokin Dam. That red trickle indicates a local road a local road trying to handle interstate traffic Interstate traffic should travel on an interstate-style freeway. There are ambitious plans rendered on ink and paper. It is time to convert the ink into concrete... The Daily Item, Sunbury January 14, 2007

6 Growth... and more traffic The past 20 years have seen significant growth in the Central Susquehanna Valley and all indications are that this pattern will continue: At its projected total cost of $525 million, the CSVT represents the single largest economic development undertaking in the history of the predominantly rural region between Williamsport and Harrisburg. This project will not only solve a serious and growing transportation problem, but will serve as a catalyst for economic development throughout the Central Susquehanna Valley and beyond. Joe McGranaghan, Chairman CSVT Task Force 1,500 new housing units are in the approval process or under construction; 290 more motel/hotel rooms are under development; as are 1.3 million square feet of commercial/office/industrial development space; providing Jobs for over 3,000 people. Based on PennDOT estimates, by the year 2020 almost 5,700 housing units will be built and 9,300 new jobs will be generated in the Valley. As for daily traffic in 2020, that will increase also: Routes 11 & 15 in Shamokin Dam, from 36,900 to 79,000 114%; Route 147, from 13,550 to 29,500 117%; Route 11, from 13,275 to 26,550 100%; and Route 15, from 15,950 to 44,500 178%. In short, nearly all the primary traffic routes in the Central Susquehanna Valley will be congested by the year 2020. Major portions of the Valley s roadway network already exceed the statewide average crash rate, for both fatal and non-fatal crashes. This situation can be expected to worsen. Currently 49% of accidents 75% of fatalities involve trucks, yet they now account for only 14% of traffic volume.

7 The Proposal and Project Update As proposed, the Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway (CSVT) will be a 12-mile, four-lane highway extending from the existing Selinsgrove Bypass (just north of the Borough of Selinsgrove) to PA Route 147 in Northumberland County, just south of Route 147 s interchange with PA Route 45. Montandon is to the north. Lewisburg is about two miles west, across the river. The project will also include a bridge across the Susquehanna River, south of Winfield; and the Route 61 Connector between the CSVT s Shamokin Dam Interchange and Veterans Memorial Bridge, which links Sunbury and Shamokin Dam. The project s primary objective is to separate local traffic from through-traffic. In so doing, it will: Reduce congestion, Provide for future growth, and Improve safety for users of the area s Routes 11 & 15 and Route 147 transportation network. The estimated project cost is $525 million. In today s dollars, the estimated cost is somewhat less. However, anticipated inflation rates of 3% per year will raise the cost. In any case, as of Summer 2009, no funding had been allocated for construction. The needed funds had yet to be identified. it will stand for generations as a work reflective of today s aspirations for the future a structure that further defines the Central Susquehanna Valley as a place and a community of distinction. CSVT Gateway Task Force March 16, 2006 The CSVT is indicated in orange.

8 The North Section and New Bridge For purposes of manageability, the CSVT project has been divided into two sections North and South. The North section, which PennDOT plans to do first, extends from County Line Road, just below the Winfield interchange, to the project s northern terminus near Montandon. It includes the bridge, which will be 140-feet high and 4,000-feet long. Final design work for the North section, including design of the Susquehanna River bridge, is expected to be complete sometime in 2010. STV Group, Inc. of Douglasville, PA are the consulting engineers. If funds are available $161 million PennDOT can proceed with earthwork, paving, and construction of the bridge. Completion of the North section will require approximately $122 million in additional funds. As of now, the construction schedule for the North section is as follows: Susquehanna River bridge 2011-2014 Structural work 2013-2015 Paving 2015-2016 The CSVT bridge will be a major new landmark in Central Pennsylvania, based on sheer size alone. It has the potential to serve as a gateway to the Central Susquehanna Valley for motorists who will travel the new Thruway. Distinctive bridges add character and identity to a region.

9 The Route 61 Connector and South Section The Route 61 Connector is a vital element of the CSVT project, critically needed to remove as much traffic as possible from Routes 11 & 15. It will primarily serve through-traffic to and from the Sunbury area and points east. Without it, such traffic is likely to continue using the Old Trail in Hummels Wharf/Shamokin Dam, the Golden Strip, and the four-mile stretch of Route 15, north of the Routes 11 & 15 divide. Next year, if funding is available, consulting engineers will be chosen to prepare final designs for the project s South section, including the Route 61 Connector. As of now, the construction schedule for the South section is as follows: Earthwork 2016-2017 Structural work 2016-2018 Paving 2018-2019 Route 61 Connector 2019-2020 Like the CSVT project s North section, funds for the South section have yet to be identified. Approximately $192 million will be needed to complete the South section. What has been accomplished? Significant work has been completed as part of the Central Susquehanna Valley Thruway project. Individual properties have been purchased. Design work has been completed as have testing and drilling. To date Pennsylvania has invested approximately $33 million in this project, and another $50 million will be spent in pre-construction activities, wetlands planning, and environmental mitigation plans.

10 Funding the CSVT Project of CSVT to be the number Adding in Pennsylvania to ensure economic development of life for the people living We consider the completion one transportation priority and to improve the quality in the Appalachian region of our state. Without Appalachian Development Highway funding of CSVT, this transportation project may be delayed indefinitely, negatively affecting the people in the Appalachian area of Pennsylvania for generations to come. Route 15 Coalition Appalachian Thruway Association According to a recent newspaper article, if someone were to give PennDOT a dime toward the cost of the CSVT project, the Department would then have ten-cents to begin construction. As of now, no funds are in place nor have they been identified. As of Summer 2009, work continued on the design, preliminary engineering, and other preconstruction activities associated with the CSVT s northern section. If funding could be secured by early 2010, PennDOT would be ready to build within 12 months. CSVT to the Appalachian Development Highway System One funding proposal that has drawn considerable interest is inclusion of the CSVT in the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS), which is funded through the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). ADHS encompasses over 2,600 miles through the 13 Appalachian states. Approximately 500 miles of ADHS have yet to be completed. In Pennsylvania, ADHS encompasses 275 miles; leaving 178 to be completed. An already intense competition for project funds would obviously be exacerbated through the addition of 12 miles, i.e., the CSVT. However, there is precedent for adding miles to ADHS. Through legislation proposed by former Senator Richard Shelby, 65 miles were added for a beltway around Birmingham, Alabama. Previous efforts to add miles for the CSVT through appropriations legislation or ARC procedures have been unsuccessful. Federal legislators are now focusing on the upcoming Highway Bill Reauthorization, a.k.a. SAFETEA-LU, as the appropriate means for allocating the needed miles. Even after the CSVT is authorized as a part of ADHS, it must be deemed a priority project by PennDOT to receive funding. The entire Appalachian region only receives $470 million annually for ADHS, meaning that it is not the entire solution, but could provide the federal funds needed for CSVT.

11 Momentum to Proceed A piece written about the proposed Thruway bridge states it will stand for generations as a work reflective of today s aspirations for the future a structure that further defines the Central Susquehanna Valley as a place and a community of distinction. The same can be said for the CSVT project as a whole. The Central Susquehanna Valley is ready for this project. Support is widespread among chambers of commerce, the media, local officials, and the general public. Through their letters, participation on task forces, and attendance at meetings and workshops, residents of the Valley have clearly expressed the necessity for the CSVT. Significant public funds have been invested in such preconstruction activities as engineering, design, and property acquisition. There is a great sense of momentum to proceed with this project. Before that can occur, we have a job to do. It s time, Mr. Carney said, noting that the project has been on the drawing board for nearly 40 years. We ve got to do what we can to get it done. The Daily Item, Sunbury April 5, 2007 In and Out of Hibernation On July 18, 2008, PennDOT announced plans to place the CSVT project on hold pending the identification of funding needed to advance the project to construction. There simply was insufficient money for the project, and little or none appeared forthcoming. That decision was reversed nine months later when Governor Edward Rendell directed PennDOT to complete design on the northern portion of the project, which includes the landmark bridge over the Susquehanna s West Branch. As for the CSVT s southern section, PennDOT officials say that based on federal transportation funding requirements, final design work and related activities cannot move forward until sufficient funds are identified and secured to construct the entire project. The remaining funds required for design, right-of-way, utilities, and construction are estimated at $525 million. The CSVT offers the potential for new, appropriate development in the Central Susquehanna Valley.

c e n t r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t