PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM

Similar documents
TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DEVELOPMENT OF TOE MIDFIELD TERMINAL IROJECT CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT REPORT DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION TOM FOERSTER CHAIRMAN BARBARA HAFER COMMISSIONER


July 21, Mayor & City Council Business Session KCI Development Program Process Update

Tampa International Airport Master Plan Update. December 12, 2012

Kansas City Aviation Department. Community Listening Session

Public Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport

BNA Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 5

Kansas City International Airport Airport Terminal Advisory Group Airport Benchmarking. February 11, 2014

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

FORECASTING FUTURE ACTIVITY

Forecast and Overview

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee Customer Service

Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport

Brief Recap of Project to Date

Dallas Love Field Update. Dallas City Council Briefing February 18, 2015

FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

14 C.F.R. Part 158. Passenger Facility Charge Program Logan International Airport. Public Notice

Appendix F International Terminal Building Main Terminal Departures Level and Boarding Areas A and G Alternatives Analysis

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

FLL Master Plan Update BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

Implications of Construction Cost Escalation

Master Plan Phase 2 Workshop

Birmingham Airport 2033

STUDY WORK GROUP MEETING No. 4. July 12, 2017

MASTER PLAN UPDATE. Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) FRESNO YOSEMITE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. Meeting #4

Westover Metropolitan Airport Master Plan Update

Airport Master Plan. Rapid City Regional Airport. October 2015 FAA Submittal

BNA Master Plan Update Public Meeting No. 2

RNO Master Plan Approved Alternatives, Financial Analysis, and Facilities Implementation Plan

Fort Wayne International Airport Master Plan Study. Executive Summary

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

Executive Summary. MASTER PLAN UPDATE Fort Collins-Loveland Municipal Airport

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (FLL) MASTER PLAN UPDATE PHASE 1

Planning, Development and Environment Committee

Love Field Modernization Program Update: Master Planning Recommendations

Kansas City Aviation Department. August 25, 2015

CVG Overview Connect with CVG March 29, 2017

GSP TERMINAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRESS KIT

CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Alternatives Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority

Master Plan Update Community Advisory Committee Kick-off Meeting

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Posted March 25, 2019

Chapter 1: Introduction Draft

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Airport Planning and Terminal Design

Benefits of NEXTT. Nick Careen SVP, APCS. Will Squires Project Manager, Atkins. Anne Carnall Program Manager, NEXTT

Chapter 1: Introduction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Master Plan Update Phase 2/3 FORT LAUDERDALE-HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 1. INTRODUCTION 2.

STUDY OVERVIEW MASTER PLAN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

MONTEREY REGIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TOPICAL QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND TOPICAL RESPONSES

SouthwestFloridaInternational Airport

GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTHORITY

Amended & Restated Lease of Terminal Building Premises (Airport Use & Lease Agreement)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Airport Master Plan Update Manchester-Boston Regional Airport. W:\ _Manchester\MPU\Final\Executive Summary.

Westshore Development Forum Presented by: Alice J. Price, AICP, Senior Project Director

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport

DRAFT. Master Plan RESPONSIBLY GROWING to support our region. Summary

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport

Notice of Intent to File an Application to Impose and Use a Passenger Facility Charge at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport


City of Kansas City AIRPORT COMMITTEE BRIEFING. Major Renovation Evaluation for Kansas City International Airport.

TERMINAL 3. tour guide booklet. April 2012

2012 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 2016 ADDENDUM VOLUME 1 SUBMITTED ON: SEPTEMBER 22, 2017

Norfolk International Airport

1.0 Project Background Mission Statement and Goals Objectives of this Sustainable Master Plan

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

The CLE Master Plan Includes:

Session 6 Airport Finance 101 Funding Sources for Airports

Chapter 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS

Current and Forecast Demand

Land Use Policy Considerations

FLIGHT PATH FOR THE FUTURE OF MOBILITY

Canada s Airports: Enabling Connectivity, Growth and Productivity for Canada

OFFICIAL D.O.T. EMERGENCY CONTINGENCY PLAN

Preferred Alternative Summary

Savannah / Hilton Head International Airport Master Plan Update

B GEORGIA INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT CARD AVIATION RECOMMENDATIONS DEFINITION OF THE ISSUE. Plan and Fund for the Future:

Draft Concept Alternatives Analysis for the Inaugural Airport Program September 2005

State of the Airport Robert S. Bowen, Executive Director October 18, 2018

BOARD ITO Aide REPORT TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

Lake Tahoe Airport Master Plan Public Meeting March 16, 2015

msp macnoise.com MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) November 17, 2010

Transportation Research Board. Session Lessons Learned from Large Airport Development. Orlando Airport Experience

Public Workshop #7 Land Use Planning June 28, 2016

RAPID CITY REGIONAL AIRPORT

Hartsfield Jackson Update prepared for:

Finance and Implementation

Alternatives. Introduction. Range of Alternatives

Kansas City Aviation Department. Airport Committee July 19, 2018

? 0-? WA", ilp. Y ON 1Z Cond 1 0 AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS BOARD REPORT TO THE Los Angeles World Airports 0*1-

General Aviation Master Plan Update

Regular Board Meeting August 4, 2015

ENVISIONING AUSTIN s Airport of the Future

PORT OF SEATTLE MEMORANDUM. COMMISSION AGENDA Item No. 6a ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting August 23, 2016

THE AIRTRAIN AIRPORT ACCESS SYSTEM JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT ACCESS SERVICE

OPTIMIZING AIRPORT OPERATING EXPENSES

Transcription:

PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS September 2017 Master Plan Update: 1. What is a Master Plan Update? The objective of a Master Plan Update (MPU) is to provide a roadmap for airport development that will accommodate the future commercial aviation needs throughout a 20-year planning period. An MPU provides a guide for efficiently accommodating forecasted aviation demand throughout the planning period, while preserving the flexibility necessary to respond to a continually evolving industry. It assesses the ability of current airport facilities to safely, efficiently, and effectively meet the forecasted demand and it recommends any necessary facility changes. An MPU is also a critical guide for investment at an airport; federal, state, and airport funds may only be used in a manner that is consistent with the current MPU. 2. Why is Allegheny County Airport Authority undertaking a Master Plan Update? Since the last Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT or the Airport) MPU was completed in 2006, significant economic and aviation industry changes have occurred. The Allegheny County Airport Authority (ACAA) is using the MPU to focus attention on identifying a development program that will match Airport facilities to the current and future needs of passengers and airlines. It is also focused on promoting an efficient and dynamic operation over the next 20 years. In preparing this MPU, the planning team identified and analyzed improvements to the airfield, terminal/gate, landside, and support facilities necessary to efficiently accommodate forecast growth in aviation activity. 3. When did the Master Plan Update process start? The ACAA started work on the MPU in October 2013. In addition to the significant changes that have occurred, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) considers updating an airport master plan every 5 to 7 years as a critical step to ensure an airport is in sync with changes and potential federal funding. 4. What are the key findings of the Master Plan Update? The economic and aviation industry changes since 2006 have affected the character of growth in aircraft operations at the Airport and, in turn, have affected the demand/capacity relationships for Airport facilities. Passenger forecasts are dramatically lower than what Airport facilities are capable of handling, which causes significant challenges to Airport redevelopment. In many cases, existing facilities are now too large or outdated to accommodate current and future need. In other cases, the Page 1 of 10

facilities are not properly configured for PIT s current role as an airport, which focuses more on local (origination and destination) passengers than on large airline hub (connecting) operations. Given the changes in demand (passenger and aircraft operation forecasts), the MPU s key findings have resulted in the following recommendation: Terminal Modernization Program relocate Landside Terminal functions and related groundside functions to be adjacent to the Airside Terminal. 5. Did the Master Plan Update consider other alternatives? The MPU considered multiple alternatives, in addition to those selected as the recommended alternatives: TERMINAL: Three terminal options were analyzed in detail: Alternative 1: Enhance the existing Landside and Airside Terminals. Alternative 2: Relocate Landside Terminal functions and related ground-side functions to be adjacent to the Airside Terminal. Alternative 3: Relocate the Airside Terminal functions and aircraft aprons to be adjacent to the Landside Terminal. 6. How will the public be involved in the Master Plan Update process? Once complete, the MPU will be provided to the public for review and comment. The ACAA will consider all public comments and incorporate any appropriate changes in the document. The MPU will then be filed with the FAA for final approval. Terminal Modernization Program: 1. What is the Terminal Modernization Program? The Terminal Modernization Program (TMP) is the Master Plan Update s (MPU s) Recommended Alternative (Alternative 2) which addresses needed terminal facility modifications at Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT or the Airport). It relocates the Landside Terminal functions and related ground-side functions to a new facility that will be built adjacent to the Airside Terminal. It also provides a new parking structure and associated roadway system to support the facility. After the new Landside Terminal is constructed and fully operational, if no viable re-use can be found for the existing Landside Terminal, it will be demolished. The TMP includes: A two-level facility consisting of the following: o Ground Level: Includes airline and Airport support, such as baggage operations, explosive baggage detection systems, and building utilities. Page 2 of 10

o Concourse Level: Includes consolidated airline operations and all passenger and public spaces such as ticketing, baggage claim, security checkpoint and concessions. The total area will be 632,000 square feet. There will be approximately 285,000 square feet per floor level. Allegheny County Airport Authority (ACAA) offices will occupy 60,000 square feet on the mezzanine-level. There will be 46 airline gates with boarding bridges and 5 swing gates for overnight aircraft, for a total of 51 gates. Existing roadways will provide access from the current Airport entrances to the new terminal building and new garage. A new roadway system will support the new terminal building. A six-story garage with 3,000 spaces will include a consolidated rental car facility, a ground transportation center, and public parking. Quick turn-around facility for rental cars. A commercial vehicle lot. A cell phone lot. Alternative 2- Terminal Modernization Program Page 3 of 10

2. What other options were considered? The Master Plan Update considered two other terminal options and Alternative 4 was added in the TMP analysis: Alternative 1: Enhance the existing Landside and Airside Terminals. Alternative 3: Relocate the Airside Terminal functions and aircraft aprons to be adjacent to the Landside Terminal. Alternative 4: Replace the garage and construct a new International Arrivals Facility (IAF) only. 3. Why were these other options rejected? A detailed financial study of total ownership costs determined that the TMP could best achieve the ACAA s and stakeholder s customer service and financial objectives at the lowest cost. Additionally, the TMP will provide the following benefits: Reduces operating expenses: o addresses higher expenses compared to peer airports automated people mover complex baggage handling systems facility size and configuration Improves facilities to support continued growth of airline service and to better serve the change over to the origin/destination market: o provides more flexible space options to accommodate better response to market changes o provides best opportunity to enhance non-airline revenues Improves customer experience through the adoption of new configuration and technology: o o o o security screening pre-boarding international arrivals value-added services Page 4 of 10

4. Can you break down the budget? 2017 2033 INVESTMENTS (IN MILLIONS) Terminal Modernization Program (TMP) Terminal Parking Roadways Demolition of Landside Terminal TMP Total Budget $783.8M $258.8M $57.1M $20.3M $1120.0M It is also important to note that, while initial construction costs are a major consideration in evaluating total ownership costs, there are other important factors, such as recurring operations and maintenance (O&M) costs, age of existing assets, and plan of finance, that contributed to determining the best business and customer service decision. 5. Are the construction costs subject to price increases over the construction period? The program budget includes price escalations and contingencies. 6. What are the total cost savings for the newly modernized Airport? The MPU estimates an annual O&M savings of $23 million from the Terminal Modernization Project. 7. How many construction jobs will be created? Direct Job Impact: A total of 6,112 direct temporary design and constructions jobs are anticipated to be generated by the TMP. These job impacts cover two periods: 563 jobs in the preconstruction design phase (2018 2019) and 5,548 jobs during the construction phase (2020 2022). Indirect Job Impact: The number of estimated direct temporary jobs created by the TMP will also create approximately 4,529 additional temporary spin-off jobs in the local area. These jobs will support the purchase of supplies and services, as well as the spending of wages earned by workers. Economic Impact: Overall, these 10,641 direct and indirect temporary jobs will generate $710 million in direct labor income (2017 values) and $908 million (2017 values) in gross regional product/value added to the region. Page 5 of 10

8. How many Airport jobs will be created? At this point, it is not possible to estimate the number of Airport jobs that the TMP may create. It is clear, however, that the TMP will provide the potential for more concession space and developable lands, which will provide the ACAA with the opportunities to generate additional jobs. 9. Is it correct that no new local tax dollars will be used? No local tax dollars will be used to fund the TMP projects. In this reference, local tax dollars means any municipal/real estate/public tax dollars provided by the county, or local governments. However, new local tax revenues will be generated from the short-term construction and from any new concessions and/or development opportunities that will be created through the TMP. 10. Have other airports made similar design modifications of this scale? Recently completed: Indianapolis International Airport and Mineta San Jose International Airport Many other airports under design or construction: Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport, Memphis International Airport, Nashville International Airport, and Kansas City International Airport 11. Does this modernization plan allow for any growth? When the MPU process began in 2013, twenty year forecasts were created to estimate growth in passengers and operations at PIT. All facilities terminal, landside support (roads and parking), and airfield were designed to meet the forecasts in the 2033 planning horizon. At its opening in 2023, the new terminal complex will have the capability to serve the 12 million annual passengers, which (based on current trends) is the forecast for 2033, or 10 years after opening. The terminal design will easily accommodate a much larger annual passenger total due to the flexibility of the space big box loose fit, and the common use technology that will be employed. Importantly, beyond growth considerations, the new terminal complex provides the Airport flexibility to more easily and effectively adapt to industry changes, including future growth, which are already affecting passenger security, international and domestic air service, and passenger preferences for traveling to/from the Airport and for services and amenities while at the Airport. Also, the new terminal complex will support a major ACAA revenue generation initiative by significantly enhancing the Airport s ability to increase income from non-air travel sources. 12. Does this Terminal Modernization Program have enough built-in flexibility to address the everchanging needs of airline travel? The design of the new facility will incorporate the best features of common-use design to ensure total flexibility in use by airlines and passengers. This type of design does not reflect any single air Page 6 of 10

carrier s requirements, and it provides the ACAA with the flexibility to meet changes in air carrier demand and service. 13. What if one of your major carriers wants to make PIT a hub airport again? The TMP design provides more operational gates than are currently being used at the Airport (51 versus 40). Further, many of the current gates are configured with exclusive-use equipment unique to a specific air carrier, thus eliminating any potential for flexibility by use of another carrier. The new design format incorporates a common-use concept that will provide more flexibility in gate and other systems usage by multiple air carriers. In the TMP design, fewer gates will provide the potential for a higher number of air carriers to utilize these gates more efficiently. So instead of the Airport becoming a smaller facility, the design of the gates will instead create a smarter facility. Also, the Airside Terminal will retain the amenities provided by AIRMALL to support any passengers who are passing through PIT. 14. Will there be any disruption in service during the construction period? Just as there wasn t any disruption in service when the current terminals were opened in 1992, there won t be any disruption during this construction period. In fact, this is one of the biggest advantages of Alternative 2. For the most part, the existing terminal will function as it currently does while the new TMP terminal is being constructed. Passengers will see no real difference in their experience during construction. The construction site can be isolated from the Security Identification Display Area (SIDA) or the secure areas of the airfield and terminal. The ability to secure the construction site in this manner, the ease of establishing construction vehicle access and material staging areas, are key contributing factors to estimating the program and the financing costs for the project and the 3-year construction period. 15. Will passengers be impacted at all during construction? No, passengers will continue to use the existing Landside Terminal and train, which will operate below ground of the construction site. There should be no real change in the passenger experience during construction. Page 7 of 10

16. How do the airlines feel about this option? Have they been briefed and provided input? As part of the decision-making process, Airport leadership met with the Signatory Air Carriers currently serving the Airport and received support from all of them to explore the preferred alternative. 17. What are examples of how the current Airport is inefficient? The systems are not compatible with all airlines; many gates and ticket counters have exclusiveuse systems unique to a particular air carrier, which reduces flexibility for the ACAA and airlines. Baggage claim is inefficient and takes too long to get from landside to airside: o The current length of the system is costly to maintain. o The airlines must handle international passengers bags twice to deliver bags to the Landside Terminal. Space at the main and alternate security checkpoints is limited and inefficiently configured. There is a lack of adequate queuing space with a total of only 11 possible lanes. Passengers on international flights, which once mostly consisted of people making connections through Pittsburgh, are now mostly people originating from/departing to Pittsburgh. The APM is costly and increases passenger transit time. Vertical conveyances (elevators and escalators) are costly to maintain. Airlines now have excess facilities, including check-in, boarding hold rooms, and operational areas that increase the cost per enplaned passenger (CPE). 18. How will the new design attract more carriers to PIT? How will the new design increase the number of direct flights? The TMP will provide a more efficient and cost-effective terminal facility, which will reduce operating costs without diminishing capacity. This will, in turn, maintain a lower CPE, which will allow the Airport to attract more airlines and service. 19. How does the TMP justify demolishing a relatively new Landside Terminal building? The Landside Terminal facility is 25 years old; many of its systems are nearing the end of their useful life, and even some elements are becoming difficult to obtain for maintenance. Further, changes in air service, security requirements, and passenger requirements result in the current Landside Terminal being cumbersome, costly, inefficient, and difficult to utilize. The MPU included a full analysis of the costs to bring the terminal and its systems up to current needs, and it was determined to be more costly than building a new facility. Added to these costs is the factor that the facility could not function at the highest and best passenger service standards simply due to its multiple levels and complicated vertical conveyance systems. Thus, in the interest of serving as Page 8 of 10

good custodians of the PIT facility and providing the most cost-efficient and customer-service based Airport possible, the ACAA has no choice but to build a new facility. Unfortunately, the current Landside Terminal facility does not lend itself to support multiple, separate users. After the new Landside Terminal is constructed and fully operational, if no viable re-use can be found for the existing Landside Terminal, it will be demolished. 20. Specifically, how will the TMP address the concerns that the airlines have about expanding their presence at PIT? Currently, the airlines have many concerns about the facilities at PIT that drive additional costs and, therefore, higher CPE. The following table identifies some of these concerns and how they will be addressed by the TMP. Concern Systems not compatible to all airlines; many gates and ticket counters have exclusive-use systems unique to an air carrier. The baggage claim system is inefficient and takes too long for bags to get from landside to airside. This system is also long and costly to maintain. Space at the main and alternate security checkpoints is limited and inefficiently configured. There is a lack of adequate queuing space with a total of only 11 possible lanes. International flights, which were once mostly people making connections, are now mostly people originating/departing to/from Pittsburgh. Automatic People Mover (APM) is costly to maintain and a potential single point of failure. Vertical conveyances (elevators and escalators) are costly to maintain. How Addressed Use standardized systems that any airline can use so that airlines can use more counters when needed and less during slower times. Single, shorter baggage delivery to and from the plane will be streamlined and faster. Shorter length and layout will save O&M costs. Design the security checkpoint with today s security needs in mind. By eliminating landside/airside distinctions, arriving passengers won t need to go through a complicated procedure to go landside. Landside Terminal abuts airside, eliminating need for APM trains, and saves on O&M costs. Single-floor layout eliminates the need for most conveyances. All of the O&M savings will translate to lower CPE and ease of operations for the air carriers. Page 9 of 10

21. How will the passenger experience be improved with the Terminal Modernization Program? The TMP will improve the passenger experience for business and leisure travelers who reside in or are visiting Pittsburgh. The TMP will add plentiful, close-in parking, restructure and streamline TSA screening, eliminate the people mover, and revamp baggage check in and baggage claim. All of these changes will assure that all travelers will get through security quicker, arrive at their gate sooner, and collect their bags faster. In particular, the TMP will offer significant improvements for international travelers by eliminating duplicative processes and improving the flow through immigration, customs, and baggage claim. Also, the TMP s one-level design, and improved signage will assure that navigation through the airport is easy and intuitive. Finally, by retaining the Airmall, cell phone waiting lot, free Wi-Fi and abundant charging stations, the TMP addresses the most popular amenities that are currently offered. 22. Is a train to the airport a part of the project? A train to the airport is not a part of the current project design. Funding for this project comes primarily from airline rates and charges and other revenue generated by airport usage parking, concessions, etc. The Federal Aviation Administration requires those funds be used for the airport solely. Airport leadership supports the idea of light rapid transit (LRT) or bus rapid transit (BRT) to the airport but funding to build such a system must come from other agencies. The current design could flex to accommodate either an LRT or BRT system should such a project occur in the future. Page 10 of 10