Long term morphological analysis and simulations

Similar documents
Thirteenth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC , Hurghada, Egypt 1249

HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF THE TOURISTIC BERTHING IN ASWAN CITY

Watershed Runoff Analysis

Hydrological study for the operation of Aposelemis reservoir Extended abstract

FLOW REDUCTION IMPACTS ALONG RIVER NILE IN EGYPT

OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE NAUTICAL DEPTH OF THE APPROACH CHANNEL TO THE PORT OF PALEMBANG, INDONESIA

You Must Be At Least This Tall To Ride This Paper. Control 27

Assessment of the ice throw and ice fall risks nearby wind energy installations

Hydraulic Report. Trail 5 Snowmobile Trail Over Mulligan Creek. Prepared By: COLEMAN ENGINEERING COMPANY Karisa V. Falls, P.E.

Development of a MIKE11 Model of the Danube, Tisa and Sava Rivers in Serbia

VOLUME CHANGES OF THE GLACIERS IN SCANDINAVIA AND ICELAND IN THE 21st CENTURY

Impacts of climate change on the hydrological processes in the Mekong River. Hui Lu & Wei Wang Tsinghua University

An Analysis of Dynamic Actions on the Big Long River

Stakeholder Meeting #1. An Introduction to the Blind Pass Inlet Management Study

Calibration of a bed load transport rate model in streams of NE Greece

Wilts & Berks Canal. Appendix E: Hydrology and Hydraulics CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. HYDROLOGY 2 3. HYDRAULIC MODEL 2 4.

Hydrological Analysis for Simanggo-2 HEPP

Blocking Sea Intrusion in Brackish Karstic Springs

Clustering radar tracks to evaluate efficiency indicators Roland Winkler Annette Temme, Christoph Bösel, Rudolf Kruse

The Problem.. SuDS: Controlling the Flow. LANDF RM Technical delivery of SuDS 15/10/2013. Bridget Woods Ballard HR Wallingford 1.

Development of Flight Inefficiency Metrics for Environmental Performance Assessment of ATM

PHY 133 Lab 6 - Conservation of Momentum

International Sava River Basin Commission

Managing water supply resources in karstic environment (temperate climate)

International Sava River Basin Commission

Waukegan & Calumet Rivers. All Hands Meeting

Study on impact force calculation formula. of ship lock gravity dolphin

Introduction. The System. Model Limitations, Assumptions, and Parameters. Optional Services Tech Memo

NC Dredge Studies NCBIWA Spring Conference April 23, 2018

NC Dredge Studies. Sterling Baker, P.E. NCDOT James Gregson NCDEQ April 5, 2018

Environmental Impact Assessment of the dredging operations and aids to navigation works in the Argentina s Santa Fe Confluencia waterway.

Jasna Plavsic. WATER-FOOD-ENERGY-ECOSYSTEMS NEXUS ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN Zagreb, 6 March 2014

Table of Contents. Master Plan March 2014 TOC i Spokane International Airport

ATTEND Analytical Tools To Evaluate Negotiation Difficulty

Key Performance Indicators

The Experimental Study on Inland Electric Propulsion Cruise Maneuverability Teng ZHAO, Rong ZHANG, Shi-yi ZHANG and Ke ZHAO

Section 2 North Slope Ecoregions and Climate Scenarios

Shrubs and alpine meadows represent the only vegetation cover.

Integrated Optimization of Arrival, Departure, and Surface Operations

Reduction of Wave Runup on a Revetment by Addition of a Berm

Cross-sectional time-series analysis of airspace capacity in Europe

Abstract. 1 Introduction

A high resolution glacier model with debris effects in Bhutan Himalaya. Orie SASAKI Kanae Laboratory 2018/02/08 (Thu)

Glacial lakes as sentinels of climate change in Central Himalaya, Nepal

A RECURSION EVENT-DRIVEN MODEL TO SOLVE THE SINGLE AIRPORT GROUND-HOLDING PROBLEM

Investigation of River Stage Simulation Before and After Bengoh Dam Construction: Case Study of Sarawak River Basin Malaysia

ONLINE DELAY MANAGEMENT IN RAILWAYS - SIMULATION OF A TRAIN TIMETABLE

Pre-lab questions: Physics 1AL CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM Spring Introduction

Amended Maintenance Dredge Spoil Management Plan. Shute Harbour Marina Resort

Validation of Runway Capacity Models

Validation Results of Airport Total Operations Planner Prototype CLOU. FAA/EUROCONTROL ATM Seminar 2007 Andreas Pick, DLR

Transfer Scheduling and Control to Reduce Passenger Waiting Time

"Transboundary coordination according to the FD Directive in the shared river basins of Greece

Project: Profiling Float Observations in the Aegean Sea

Simulation Analysis on Navigation Indexes of Wanzhou Yangtze River Highway Bridge after the Anti-Collision Device Construction by Ship Model Test

STUDY OF ALAQI SECONDARY CHANNEL IN LAKE NASSER

Revised Draft: May 8, 2000

Time Benefits of Free-Flight for a Commercial Aircraft

The reflex airfoil has low drag values and corresponding low CL values

Efficiency and Environment KPAs

Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula

MARINA BOLADO PENAGOS A METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE ROLE OF THE RIVER DISCHARGES TO THE GULF OF CADIZ ON THE NUTRIENT SUPPLY TO THE ALBORAN SEA

Multiple comparison of green express aviation network path optimization research

Worst-case analysis of wake vortex induced risk of 700ft vertical separation. Gerben van Baren

Wake Turbulence Research Modeling

Project Data Sheet BASIC PROJECT DATA

National and Regional Activities, Needs and Expectations

Contributions of Advanced Taxi Time Calculation to Airport Operations Efficiency

Assessment of glacier water resources based on the Glacier Inventory of China

Study on the assessment method for results of ship maneuvering training with the simulator

Quantile Regression Based Estimation of Statistical Contingency Fuel. Lei Kang, Mark Hansen June 29, 2017

Abstract. Introduction

Tunnel design underneath the operating runway of Incheon airport

The Potentially Dangerous Glacial Lakes

to Reduce Greenhouse Effects

Implementing ASMA and Taxi Out Additional Times algorithms: a practical experience

Snow/Ice melt and Glacial Lake Outburst Flood in Himalayan region

Water masses and circulation in the North Atlantic

Research on Pilots Development Planning

Guidelines for Snow Avalanche Risk Determination and Mapping. David McClung University of British Columbia

Neighborhood Dredging SSD Program. Brief to Beaches & Waterways Commission

University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department. MAE 4415/5415 Project #1 Glider Design. Due: March 11, 2008

Group constant generation for PARCS using Helios and Serpent and comparison to Serpent 3D model

When the preventative evacuation of Orléans can be decided on before a flood?

The Danube Experience

Inland waterways and extreme weather EWENT and ECCONET projects results

ICAO Noise Standards

Simulation of runoff processes of a continental mountain glacier in the Tian Shan, China

MODELING OF SEDIMENTATION PROCESS IN ASWAN HIGH DAM RESERVOIR

National Infrastructure Assessment Technical Annex. Technical annex: Tidal power

SIMULATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AIRSPACE

superseded by 2008 nhc report

AIS DATA ANALYSIS FOR REALISTIC SHIP TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL

An Analytical Approach to the BFS vs. DFS Algorithm Selection Problem 1

Final conference e4ships. -Project Pa-X-ell-

IPSOS / REUTERS POLL DATA Prepared by Ipsos Public Affairs

Unit 6: Probability Plotting

Flight Arrival Simulation

Vista Vista consultation workshop. 23 October 2017 Frequentis, Vienna

Optimising throughput of rail dump stations, via simulation and control system changes. Rob Angus BMT WBM Pty Ltd Brisbane 5 June 2013

Transcription:

Long term morphological analysis and simulations Dr.-Ing. Markus Promny Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde / Federal Institute of Hydrology GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 1

1D-models of German waterways area: river Rhine, (river Elbe) input: climate projections -> run-off time series dredging and dumping scenarios: - no d&d - d&d constant over time as mean value of 1993-2006 - d&d dependent on flow depth (simple algorithm) aim: prediction of bed-level development until 2050 and 2100 (navigability, maintenance costs) GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 2

1D-models of German waterways (free-flowing, morphologically active) Elbe: Rhine: Elbe IffezheimLobith 540 km 1014 cross sections Rhine GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 ÚstíGeesthacht 620 km + Saale 3830 cross sections page 3

1D-cross sections cross section characteristics: symmetric, y-z-coordinates sorted 3 sections (main, floodplain 1, 2) grain size distribution flood plain roughness v m, floodplain1 v m, main calculated parameters: - water level - velocities - bed load transport - bed level change - grain size changes substrate: 9 layers (can be fixed) 11 grain size fractions GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 4

Scenarios climate projections emissions scenarios (A1B, A2, B1)* -> climate -> rainfall -> run-off for drainage basins -> model input: Q-time-series until 2100 *from IPCC-report 2007 GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 5

Scenarios climate projections 1,3 1,2 1,1 1 0,9 0,8 0,7 C20_A1B_HADCM3Q0_HIRHAM_25 C20_A1B_HADCM3Q0_CLM_25 C20_A1B_EH5r3_REGCM_25 C20_A1B_EH5r3_HIRHAM5_25 C20_A1B_ARP_ALADIN_25 C20_A1B_EH5r1_CCLM_20 C20_A1B_CGCM3_CRCM_25 C20_A1B_EH5r1_REMO_10 C20_A1B_EH5r3_RCA_25 C20_B1_EH5r1_REMO_10 ratio of HM7Q change C20_A1B_HADCM3Q16_RCA3_25 C20_A1B_HADCM3Q0_RRCM_25 emissions scenarios (A1B, A2, B1)* -> climate -> rainfall -> run-off for drainage basins -> model input: Q-time-series until 2100 *from IPCC-report 2007 near future / control period far future / control period HM7Q - highest mean 7-day run-off in a time series time series: control period - 1961-1990 near future - 2021-2050 far future - 2071-2100 GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 6

Calculation scheme of SOBEK-1D - flow: fully implicit scheme (Preissmann) - sediment transport: Meyer-Peter and Müller formula - parameters Θ crit (0.032 to 0.028) and calibration factor γ s (0.7 to 1.0) defined per branch example: sediment transport at Speyer (Rh.-km 403) sediment transport (gravel+sand) [kg/s]. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) measured (bed load trap) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 discharge Q [m³/s] GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 7

Calculation scheme of SOBEK-1D - flow: fully implicit scheme (Preissmann) - sediment transport: Meyer-Peter and Müller formula - parameters Θ crit (0.032 to 0.028) and calibration factor γ s (0.7 to 1.0) defined per branch example: sediment transport at Speyer (Rh.-km 403) sediment transport (gravel+sand) [kg/s]. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) d50=9-11 mm calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) d50=11-13 mm calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) d50=13-15 mm calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) d50=15-17 mm measured (bed load trap) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 main influence on transport rate variability: substrate grain diameter discharge Q [m³/s] GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 8

2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5-2,0 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725 750 775 800 825 850 875 bed-level development calibration period observed (soundings) Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 9 mean bed level change 1993-2004 [m].

2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5-2,0 850 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725 750 775 800 825 875 bed-level development calibration period observed (soundings) calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) calculated (still uncalibrated) Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 10 mean bed level change 1993-2004 [m].

2,0 bed-level development calibration period 1,5 observed (soundings) calculated (SOBEK 1D-model) calculated (still uncalibrated) mean bed level change 1993-2004 [m]. 1,0 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5-2,0 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 11 550

2,0 bed-level development calibration period 1,5 1,0 mean bed level change [m]. 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5 1993-2004 (calibration period) -2,0 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 12 550

2,0 bed-level development scenario: (starting in 2007) 1,5 dredging and dumping = 0 1,0 simulation: A1B_EH5r1_REMO_10_ls mean bed level change [m]. 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5 1993-2004 (calibration period) 2007-2010 2007-2015 2007-2020 2007-2027 -2,0 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 13 550

2,0 bed-level development comparison of scenarios 1,5 1,0 simulation: A1B_EH5r1_REMO_10_ls mean bed level change [m]. 0,5 0,0-0,5-1,0-1,5 bed load supply site Iffezheim 1993-2004 (calibration period) 2007-2017, dredging&dumping = 0 2007-2017, dredging&dumping constant (mean of 1993-2006) bed load trap Mainz Weisenau -2,0 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 Rhine-km GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 14 550

Conclusion and outlook - 1D-river basin-wide models work in principle - first results have been obtained TO DO: - solve stability problems at strong bed level changes - implement simple dredging and dumping algorithm - extend simulations to full project time (2100) and space (Rhine + Elbe) GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 15

Thank you very much. Dr.-Ing. Markus Promny Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde / Federal Institute of Hydrology GESINUS 2010 - Liège - 29./30.07.2010 page 16