EUROCONTROL Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) FINLAND Year 2016 Level 1
Document Title LSSIP Year 2016 for Finland Infocentre Reference 17/01/30/114 Date of Edition 11/04/2017 LSSIP Focal Point Iiro KESKIVÄLI iiro.keskivali@trafi.fi LSSIP Contact Person Luca Dell Orto luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip Reference Documents LSSIP Documents LSSIP Guidance Material Master Plan Level 3 Plan Edition 2016 Master Plan Level 3 Report Year 2015 European ATM Portal STATFOR Forecasts Acronyms and abbreviations National AIP FAB Performance Plan http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries http://www.ais.fi http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/europeanatmmasterplanlevel3implementationplan http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/europeanatmmasterplanlevel3implementationreport https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/sesperformanceschemereferenceperiod220152019 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET The following authority(ies) have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2016 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016 (also known as the ESSIP Plan). LSSIP Year 2016 Finland Released Issue
CONTENTS Chapter 1 National ATM Environment... 5 1.1. Geographical Scope... 5 1.1.1. International Membership... 5 1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s)... 5 1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation... 6 1.2. National Stakeholders... 6 1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s)... 7 1.2.2. FINAVIA Coorporation... 9 1.2.3. Airports... 10 1.2.4. Military Authorities... 11 Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity... 14 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Finland... 14 2.2. Tampere ACC... 15 2.2.1. Traffic and enroute ATFM delays 20122021... 15 2.2.2. Performance summer 2016... 15 2.2.3. Planning Period 20172021... 16 Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations... 19 Chapter 4 National Projects... 21 Chapter 5 Regional Coordination... 22 5.1. FAB Coordination... 22 5.2. FAB Projects... 25 5.3. Regional cooperation... 28 Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress... 33 6.1. State View... 33 6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation... 33 6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature... 34 6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation... 38 6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress... 39 6.3. Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring... 50 Annexes LSSIP Year 2016 Finland Released Issue
Executive Summary National ATM Context The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi (CAA Finland), including the role as NSA. Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 23 state owned airports with ATS, of which 20 are involved in regular traffic. A separation of ANSprovision from airport operator is foreseen in the year 2017. In addition, there are three nonstateowned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being coordinated and covered by the LSSIP The Finnish Meteorological Institute is designated as MET service provider to supply MET data on an exclusive basis in Finland FIR. Trafi, Finavia and FMI report to Ministry of Transport and Communications. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management. Finland has an integrated civilmilitary ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs. Military/Air Force does not have any service provision role in Finnish aviation. Safety investigations following accidents and/or serious incidents are carried out by the Safety Investigation Authority (SIA), reporting to the Ministry of Justice. Traffic and Capacity 2016 Traffic in Finland decreased by 2.1% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2015. 20172021 The EUROCONTROL SevenYear forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.8% and 2.7% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 0.8%. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 1 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives Overview Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 3; 8% 1; 3% Completed Ongoing Planned 16; 42% Late No Plan 18; 47% Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined Finland is late in implementing objectives ITYADQ, ITYFMTP and INF07. Finavia expects to be compliant with ADQ regulation by Q3/2019. The objective ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) is planned to be implemented by June 2017. INF07 is expected to be implemented in 2017. Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 (PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest are considered SESAR baseline); note that three objectives AOM19.1, FCM05 and NAV03 are considered as both part of the SESAR baseline and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases. The objectives declared Achieved in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011 2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State. SESAR Baseline Implementation PCP Implementation 2010 2019 77% 2015 2023 38% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 2 Released Issue
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. Optimised ATM Network Services Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing Airport Operations Enabling Aviation Infrastructure 68% 23% 93% 100 % 96% n/a 45% 3% ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs for Block 0. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter 6.1.3. Block 0 2010 2018 84% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 3 Released Issue
Introduction The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2016, together with plans for the next years. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players civil and military and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided; Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level; Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2015 which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations; Chapter 4 provides the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the State per each project included in this chapter; Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned; Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the highlevel information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Chapter 6.2 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016. The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 4 Released Issue
Chapter 1 National ATM Environment 1.1. Geographical Scope 1.1.1. International Membership Finland is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM: Organisation Since ECAC 1955 EUROCONTROL 2001 European Union 1995 EASA 2006 ICAO 1949 NATO ITU 1920 1.1.2. Geographical description of the FIR(s) The geographical scope of this document addresses the Finland FIR (EFIN). Finland FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 4 States, namely Norway (Norway FIR/UIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR/UIR), Estonia (Tallinn FIR/UIR) and a nonecac State, Russia (St Petersburg FIR and Murmansk FIR). In order to achieve some of the objectives of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan (a.k.a. the ESSIP Plan), Finland ACC coordinates actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 5 Released Issue
1.1.3. Airspace Classification and Organisation On 27 November 2003, ICAO airspace Class C was implemented above FL 95 and the upper limit of controlled airspace was raised to FL660 (i.e. in excess of the requirements of Achieved ECIP Objective AOM09). AIP Finland is available at: www.ais.fi The Finnish Military uses the Metric system in one aircraft type (the L70, a single engine piston trainer). 1.2. National Stakeholders The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Finland are the following: Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi (CAA) the civil aviation regulatory body and NSA Finavia Corporation the main ATS provider in Finland; Finnish Meteorological Institute designated MET provider Mikkeli airport (EFMI), AFIS service provider; Seinäjoki airport (EFSI), AFIS service provider; Military Aviation Authority (MAA) the military regulatory body; Air Force Command Finland; Safety Investigation Authority (SIA). LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 6 Released Issue
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. 1.2.1. Civil Regulator(s) General Information Civil Aviation in Finland is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. Activity in ATM: Rulemaking Organisation responsible MoTC, CAA Finland Legal Basis Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Safety Oversight CAA Finland (NSA) Aviation Act (864/2014), Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) and Government Decree on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (865/2009) Enforcement actions in case of noncompliance with safety regulatory requirements CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014), Criminal Code (39/1889) Airspace MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014) Economic MoTC, CAA Finland Aviation Act (864/2014) LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 7 Released Issue
Environment Security Accident investigation Environmental permit authority CAA Finland MoTC, CAA Finland Ministry of Justice, Safety Investigation Authority Environmental permits for airports are granted by permit authority according to Environmental Protection Act 86/2000 and Environmental protection decrees 169/2000 and 713/2014. CAA Finland has regulatory power in some environmental issues according to Aviation Act (864/2014) Aviation Act (864/2014) and Act on the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (863/2009) Safety Investigation Act (525/2011) The CAA Finland is further detailed in the following sections. FINNISH CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY The civil aviation regulatory tasks are carried by the Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi). It is an independent agency operating under the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC) and is institutionally separated from the Air Navigation Service Providers. Annual Report published: Y Finnish Transport Safety Agency Annual report can be found via the following link. http://www.trafi.fi/en/about_trafi/annual_report The Finnish Transport Safety Agency Trafi is the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) in Finland. http://www.trafi.fi/en The current organisation chart is given at Annex B. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 8 Released Issue
1.2.2. FINAVIA Coorporation Service provided Name of the ANSP: Finavia Corporation Governance: Corporation Ownership: 100% Stateowned Services provided Y/N Comment ATC enroute ATC approach ATC Airport(s) AIS CNS MET ATCO training Y Y Y Y Y N Y Others Y Operates Helsinki Airport and 24 other airports in Finland Additional information: Provision of services in other State(s): N Annual Report published: Y Finavia annual reports can be found at http://vuosikertomus.finavia.fi/en/ Finavia s website is found at: http://www.finavia.fi Finavia s organisation chart is at Annex B. Finavia organisation is governed by Board of Directors as described in the Annual Report. ATC systems in use Main ANSP part of any technology alliance 1 N FDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade 2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit The present Thales TopSky ATMsystem is under continuous development. EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 22 sites. 1 Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40)) LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 9 Released Issue
SDPS Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES AS Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? EFIN 2015, EFHK 2015 Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? ATC Unit The present Thales TopSky ATMsystem is under continuous development. EFIN ACC, EFHK TWR/APP, smaller TWR/APP and TWR systems at 22 sites. ATC Units The ATC units in the Finnish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following: ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks Enroute TMA Finland ACC (EFIN) 13 EFIN Helsinki APP 4 EFIN Note: The number of sectors as indicated in this table is the number of technically existing sectors, some of those sectors are operationally used in combined sector formats. 1.2.3. Airports General information Finavia Corporation is responsible for maintaining 23 state owned airports with ATS, of which 20 are involved in regular traffic. In addition, there are three nonstateowned airports in Finland not managed by Finavia (Lappeenranta, Mikkeli and Seinäjoki). Helsinki Airport is the primary airport and also the only one being coordinated and covered by the LSSIP. Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP APO SloAs are contained in the following objectives: ENV, AOP, ITYADQ and SAF11. In addition to the List of Airports in Annex E of the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives. According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Helsinki airport. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 10 Released Issue
1.2.4. Military Authorities The Military Authorities in Finland are composed of: Defence Command Finland; Air Force Command Finland; Navy Command Finland; Army Command Finland; Military Aviation Authority (MAA). They are supervised by the ministry of Defence. Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below. The Military Aviation Authority (MAA) carries out its assigned tasks as decreed in the Aviation Act. The MAA is responsible for the safety and monitoring of military aviation and for other tasks that are within the prerogatives of a military aviation authority e.g. certification of military aircraft and equipment, and participation in decision making progress concerning airspace management. Finland has an integrated civilmilitary ATM system without permanently segregated military airspace. Segregation of airspace for military use is done on basis of actual needs. Information on the application of FUA is in 1.2.4.4. The current organisation chart is given at ANNEX B. Regulatory role Regulatory framework and rulemaking OAT GAT OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions? Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions? N/A Level of such legal provision: 1) Finnish Aviation Act Level of such legal provision: 2) Aviation Regulationseries (issued by FCAA, incl. Rules of the Air) 3) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by MAA, e.g.regulations on Air Traffic Services for military aviation) 4) Military Aviation Regulations (issued by FINAF; e.g. prerogatives) Authority signing such legal provision: 1) Parliament/Head of State (President) Authority signing such legal provision: 2) Director General of FCAA (DGCA Finland) 3) Director of MAA 4) Commander of Finnish Air Force These provisions cover: Rules of the Air for OAT Y These provisions cover: Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT OAT/GAT Coordination Y OAT/GAT Coordination ATCO Training Y ATCO Training ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 11 Released Issue
ANSP Certification Y ANSP Certification ANSP Supervision Y ANSP Supervision Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability Aircrew Licensing Additional Information: The Finnish Aviation Act is binding for all civil and military aviation in Finland. Based on the Aviation Act the MAA has the right to supplement aviation regulations with official directives to such an extent that is permitted by the applicable regulations. Y Additional Information: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions: National AIP N National AIP National Military AIP N National Military AIP EUROCONTROL eaip N EUROCONTROL eaip Other: Other: Oversight OAT GAT 2 National oversight body for OAT: NSA NSA (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A Additional information: Additional information: Service Provision role OAT GAT Services Provided: Services Provided: EnRoute N Civil ANSP (Finavia) EnRoute N Approach/TMA N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Approach/TMA N Airfield/TWR/GND N Civil ANSP (Finavia) Airfield/TWR/GND N AIS N Civil ANSP (Finavia) AIS N MET N Finnish Meteorological Institute MET N SAR N Civil ANSP (Finavia) The Military assists civil ARSC on request SAR N TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N Other: Other: N Additional Information: Additional Information: No GAT services provided by the Military Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified? Certificate issued by: Additional Information: N If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate: If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations? LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 12 Released Issue
User role IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly? OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT If Military fly OATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options: Free Routing Within specific corridors only Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service If Military fly GATIFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements: No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS Others: Few Instrument Approach Procedures only for military aviation Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) Military in Finland applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: FUA Level 1 implemented: Y FUA Level 2 implemented: Y FUA Level 3 implemented: Y Y LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 13 Released Issue
Chapter 2 Traffic and Capacity 2.1. Evolution of traffic in Finland 350.000 Finland Annual IFR Movements 300.000 250.000 IFR flights 200.000 150.000 100.000 IFR movements Actuals IFR movements Baseline forecast 50.000 0 IFR movements High forecast IFR movements Low forecast 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F A = Actual F = Forecast EUROCONTROL SevenYear Forecast (September 2016) IFR flights yearly growth 2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F H 1,2% 1,2% 3,3% 3,0% 3,5% 2,7% 2,9% Finland B 3,5% 2,0% 0,0% 1,5% 0,6% 1,1% 1,2% 1,5% 1,0% 1,2% L 1,9% 2,4% 0,9% 0,3% 0,0% 0,6% 0,3% ECAC B 1,1% 1,7% 1,6% 2,7% 1,4% 2,1% 2,1% 2,4% 1,9% 2,1% 2016 Traffic in Finland decreased by 2.1% during Summer 2016 (May to October inclusive) compared to the same period in 2015. 20172021 The EUROCONTROL SevenYear forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.8% and 2.7% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 0.8%. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 14 Released Issue
2.2. Tampere ACC 2.2.1. Traffic and enroute ATFM delays 20122021 EFESACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) 700 600 500 400 300 200 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) 100 0.2 0.1 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Peak Day Traffic 620 592 594 579 585 Summer Traffic 480 451 465 452 451 Yearly Traffic 485 451 459 445 446 Summer Traffic Forecast 447 454 460 467 476 High Traffic Forecast Summer 452 466 483 506 514 Low Traffic Forecast Summer 441 437 441 441 444 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.02 0.00 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.0 *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/2016 2.2.2. Performance summer 2016 Enroute Delay (min/flight) Summer Capacity Traffic Evolution 2016 Capacity Baseline Ref value Actual gap 0.4 % 58 (0%) 0.07 0.00 No The average enroute delay per remained at zero minutes per flight in Summer 2016. Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments NEFRA phase2 (ES and EK to join) Yes Maintain number of controllers Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10 ATCOs) Yes Maximum configuration: 6 sectors Yes 5 sectors were sufficient Summer 2016 performance assessment The capacity baseline was estimated at the same level as last year. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 40 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 33. Yes LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 15 Released Issue
EFESACC Traffic and enroute ATFM delays IFR flights (Daily Average) 700 600 500 400 300 200 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Enroute Delay (minutes per flight) 100 0.2 0.1 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Peak Day Traffic 620 592 594 579 585 Summer Traffic 480 451 465 452 451 Yearly Traffic 485 451 459 445 446 Summer Traffic Forecast 447 454 460 467 476 High Traffic Forecast Summer 452 466 483 506 514 Low Traffic Forecast Summer 441 437 441 441 444 Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.02 0.00 0.16 0.03 0.00 0.0 *From 01/01/2016 to 31/10/2016 2.2.3. Planning Period 20172021 The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles. ACC EFIN 58 Capacity Profiles 2016 Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year) baseline 2017 2018 2019 H 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Ref. 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% L 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% Open 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% C/R 58 0% 58 0% 58 0% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 16 Released Issue
Capacity Plan 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Free Route Airspace NEFRA, EN to join Airspace Management Advanced FUA Airport & TMA Network Integration Cooperative Traffic Management Airspace Procedures Staffing Technical Capacity Significant Events Start CPDLC Project Maintain number of controllers Partial move of ACC functions to new ACC at EFHK (10ATCOs) Possible complete move of ACC to EFHK to be decided Max sectors 13 13 13 13 13 Max Conf 5 to 6 6 6 6 6 Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile Sufficient capacity to meet demand N/A N/A Annual Reference Value (min) 0.09 0.09 0.09 N/A Summer reference value (min) 0.07 0.07 0.07 N/A N/A N/A Additional information The opening scheme will be flexibly adapted to the traffic demand and might go up to 6 sectors if needed in Summer 2017. Sectors available Summer 2017 WD Sectors available Summer 2017 WE 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 00:00 02:00 04:00 06:00 08:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 17 Released Issue
EFINCTA Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios 70 60 Capacity profile (movements per hour) 50 40 30 20 10 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2019 Reference Capacity Profile 58 58 58 Capacity Profile Shortest Routes (Open) 58 58 58 Capacity Profile Current Routes 58 58 58 Capacity Profile High 58 58 58 Capacity Profile Low 58 58 58 Capacity Baseline 58 58 2017 2021 Plan 58 58 58 58 58 2017 2021 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for the ACC during the planning cycle. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 18 Released Issue
Chapter 3 Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report recommendations Recommendations issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2015 applicable to Finland all items that require corrective actions and improvements. Reference number REC2015/1 Recommendation 2015 Operational stakeholders should ensure that the pace of implementation of presesar elements is increased, or at least kept at the same level to ensure timely delivery of SESAR baseline. Corrective actions taken: YES Ownership All operational stakeholders Description: Additional SESAR elements are under implementation, including PCPelements Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of AOM19, FCM04, ATC07.1, ATC15, NAV10, ENV01, AOP04.1, Local REC2015/2 ITYADQ, ITYFMTP, INF07, COM10to take corrective Stakeholders measures to reduce the implementation delays, or at least ensure that these delays are not increased. Corrective actions taken: YES Description: AOM19: AOM19.1 (ASM support tools to support AFUA), AOM19.2 (ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data) and AOM19.3 (Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing) are all expected to be fully completed within the timeframe of the objectives. FCM04: FCM04.1 (Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1) is not applicable to Finland and FCM04.2 (Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2) is expected to be fully completed within the timeframe of the objective. For Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2. ATC07.1 (AMAN tools and procedures): The objective has been completed. ATC15: ATC15.1 (Implement, in enroute operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of basic AMAN). The objective has been completed. ATC15.2 (Arrival Management extended to enroute Airspace). The objective is not applicable to Finland. NAV10 (APV procedures): The objective has been completed. ENV01 (Continuous Descent Operations (CDO): The objective has been completed. AOP04.1 (Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (ASMGCS) Level1). The objective has been completed. ITYADQ (Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information). The requirements of this objective are considered extremely challenging to meet by 2017. Expected implementation by Q3/2019. ITYFMTP (Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP): The requirements are planned to be implemented by June 2017. INF07 (Implement integrated briefing): Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in 2017. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 19 Released Issue
Reference number Recommendation 2015 Ownership COM10 (Migrate from AFTN to AMHS): Basic AMHS implemented in 2010 but due to delays at regional AMHS center at Copenhagen, transition of connections from Cidin to AMHS were delayed. Transition was done 10/2016. Extended AMHS planned to become operational by 31/12/2018 REC2015/7 ANSPs should use the momentum created by PCP funding opportunities to secure and achieve full interoperability in line with Master Plan Level 1 vision. Corrective actions taken: YES ANSPs benefiting from EU funding Description: Remarkable amount of CEF funding was granted for Finavia during 2016 (INEA Call 2015), enabling more intensive implementation of the PCP AF:s during years 20162020. Additional applications for funding projects were launched during 2016 (INEA Call 2016). LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 20 Released Issue
Chapter 4 National Projects The development of the present ATM system is a continuous process by introducing new functionalities which are mainly originated from the IR regulations and/or ESSIP objectives. The progress of these projects is therefore reflected in the progress of ESSIP objectives in Ch. 6. There are no other projects for public view ongoing at national level at the moment. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 21 Released Issue
Chapter 5 Regional Coordination 5.1. FAB Coordination Optimised ATM Network Services All NEFAB ANSPs will implement automated ASM support system with the capability of AIXM 5.1 B2B data exchange with NM by end of 2017 All NEFAB ANSPs have nearly implemented the COTR (Avinor missing ASP08 & ASP09 due to ongoing system upgrade). Latvia has completed ITYCOTR. The automatic exchange of the AFP messages will be implemented by the end of 2017 in all NEFAB ANSPs. Latvia has implemented the automatic exchange of AFP messages. The implementation deadline for FRA traffic will be specified. * * EUROCONTROL has issued "IFPS Users Manual Edition 20.1 Date 22/11/2016" containing AFPrelated changes. ANSPs have to test the part of AFP functioning in FRA environment. Advanced Air Traffic Services Joint FAB project: NEFAB Free Route Airspace across the FAB above FL135 in Norway and above FL95 in Finland, Estonia and Latvia. Airspace scenarios and simulations were supported by EUROCONTROL. Basic AMAN implemented for major airports in Norway and Finland. Latvia plans to implement Basic AMAN in RIX within 2017. PRNAV almost fully implemented, LGS partly. LGS plans to implement RNAV procedures by end 2018. High Performing Airport Operations All main airports have implemented ASMGCS level 1 and level 2; at Helsinki level 2 will become operational during 2017. Airports CDM implemented fully by Helsinki and Oslo airports; others follow in line with the FOC. DPI messages exchanged between Network Manager and both Helsinki and Oslo Airport. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 22 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure All 4 ANSPs have technical readiness to replace X.25 with TCP/IP. Due to institutional and technical reasons AGDL implementation is late for all ANSPs. Estonia, Norway and Latvia implemented FMTP provisions; Finland plans FMTP to become operational during 2017. Latvia, Norway and Finland are PENS users. Estonia and Latvia moved from AFTN to AMHS (COM 10), Finland implemented basic AMHS in October 2016. NEFAB Safety KPIs SMI of 95% and RI of 95% were achieved. Level of Effectiveness of Safety management was Level C for EANS, Finavia and LGS, and D for Avinor. Present level will be maintained as minimum but efforts will be addressed to minimize number of incidents. The enroute ATFM delay in NEFAB in 2016 was 0.07 min per flight which meets the FABwide KPI (0.12). The performance at national levels varied from 0.0 to 0.11. Capacity is presently sufficient and ATM systems are developed with regard to the growing capacity demand. Cost efficiency will be improved along with the developments of the Operational Efficiency programs. ANSPs are committed to protect their organisations and systems from cyber threats. NEFAB Free Route Airspace implemented in NEFAB States in November 2015 is connected with the FRA in DK/SE FAB. Most enhancements to enable seamless crossborder FRA operations between both FABs were implemented in June 2016 and will be finalised in May 2017. The area is being further expanded in the Borealis FRA programme through establishing interfaces with FRA areas in UK/Ireland FAB and Iceland. This will be perceived by airspace users as continuous FRA area across nine states maximising the benefits for customers. In NEFAB airspace airlines can select between the fixed route network and free route operations. The NEFAB Free Route Airspace enables users to flightplan and fly userpreferred trajectories. NEFAB Horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory (KEA) in 2016 was 1.73%. The Union target requires inefficiencies in actual trajectories decrease to 2.60% by 2019. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 23 Released Issue
5.2. FAB Projects Kirkenes CrossBorder Area Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), FINAVIA (FI) Type of project: FAB Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references Completed Completed ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: In November 2016 Avinor and Finavia launched cross border ATS across the border of Finland and Norway, where Kirkenes Tower/Approach is now providing the services in parts of Finnish Airspace. N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N Name/Code in DP2016: The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. No effect The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. The arrangement facilitates more efficient and safe flight operations for flights in and outbound Kirkenes Airport in Northern Norway serving the interests of airspace users. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 24 Released Issue
NEFAB FRA Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV) Schedule: Target date: December 31, 2017 Status: Description: Link and references Ongoing, ontime. Type of project: FAB Implementation of unrestricted and seamless FRA within NEFAB and implementation of FRA compliant procedures in Bodø Oceanic. Implementation of seamless FRA interface with Norway was postponed due to technical upgrade delay in Avinor ATM system Revised solution of unrestricted FRA between Finland, Estonia and Latvia, and statewide FRA in Norway were implemented in November 2015. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017.Flight planning in Bodø Oceanic shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030. ATM MP links: L3: AOM21.2 L2: AOM0500 Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Nill N Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: N/A Y Name/Code in DP2016: 2015_227_AF3 Safety levels remain unchanged Environment: ++ Enables fly shorter routes and save time and fuel burn Capacity: Present capacity Costefficiency: + For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Operational efficiency: ++ Optimised horizontal flight profiles Cooperation Activities: LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 25 Released Issue
NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8) Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV) Type of project: FAB Seamless FRA interface between Norway and NEFAB East/DKSE FAB will be implemented in May 2017. FRA will be implemented in Bodø Oceanic from March 2017. Flight planning shall be done in accordance with ICAO Doc 7030. Ongoing Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Implementation of Scenario 8 i.e. unrestricted and seamless FRA interface with DK/SE FAB; implementation of FRA in Bodø Oceanic. L3: AOM21.2 Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Y Name/Code in DP2016: AF 3.2.4 Present or improved safety Present or improved, depending on airspace users Present or additional capacity For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency Harmonisation of flight planning rules, ASM, AIP publication, ATM system upgrades to comply with common ORs and IFPS integration. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 26 Released Issue
5.3. Regional cooperation Borealis FRA Implementation (Part 2) (2015_227_AF3_A; 2015_227_AF3_B) Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 15/02/2016 31/12/2020 Status: Ongoing, on time, INEA funding granted (Call 2015) Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Type of project: Regional Project Objective: Implementing FRA, which is a key element of ATM Functionality (AF3) Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route, across three functional airspace blocks (FABs). Namely, NEFAB, DKSE FAB and UKIRE FAB The implementation will support the achievement of the flight efficiency targets for RP2 of the performance scheme. The Performance Review Body (PRB) and the Network Manager (NM) has highlighted the need to pay particular attention to interfaces between the Functional Airspace Blocks (FABs) and the deployment of FRA initiatives to achieve these targets Reducing fuel consumption by allowing users to flightplan their preferred trajectories Introducing seamless integration among ACCs Reducing the effort on ATCOs by allowing a more costeffective approach, while keeping the highest level of safety The implementation also includes EANS (Estonia) who are applying for funding their contribution towards implementation through the Cohesion fund Contributors: Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, Irish Aviation Authority, LFV, NATS, Naviair, Ryanair, LGS, EANS, Isavia The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 9 partners (Avinor Flysikring AS, Finavia, IAA, LFV,LGS, NATS, Naviair, EANS, Isavia, Ryanair) and is split into a cohesion and noncohesion part. L3: AOM21.2 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 2015_227_AF3_A and 2015_227_AF3_B Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 27 Released Issue
Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 Organisation(s): Schedule: 31.12.2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAAATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Ongoing, on time Type of project: Regional Implementation of FRA in Scottish FIR, Interface with NEFAB and DK/SE FAB FRAs INEA funding granted (Call 2015) L3: AOM21.2 Other links: SESAR Deployment Program 2015 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Present or improved safety Present or improved environmental impact Present or additional capacity Improved cost efficiency for airspace users Common project management, simulations, training and deployment Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 2 Organisation(s): AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAAATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 31.12.2021 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Ongoing, on time Type of project: Regional Implementation of FRA in London FIR, implementation of FRA in Icelandic airspace and interfacing with neighbouring NEFAB & DK/SE FAB INEA funding granted (Call 2015) L3: AOM21.2 Other links: SESAR Deployment Program 2015 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Present or improved safety Present or improved environmental impact Present or additional capacity Improved cost efficiency for airspace users Common project management, simulations, training and deployment LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 28 Released Issue
Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) Organisation(s): AVINOR AS (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK) Schedule: 01/01/2014 31/12/2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Completed Type of project: Regional The Borealis Alliance will implement Free Route Airspace (FRA) within the NEFRA region that consists of the two functional airspace blocks (FAB) of DenmarkSweden and North European Functional Airspace Block (Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway). Free Route Airspace is a key element of the Pilot Common Project and NEFRA is a crossborder inter FAB region of Europe. This project will be broken down into airspace design, fast and realtime simulations and finally implementation. A second part is planned at a later stage to cover also the airspaces of UK, Ireland and Iceland. L3: AOM21.2 Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: DP2016: Family 3.2.4; Project 020AF3 Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: NEFRA Phase 1 Organisation(s): Schedule: 23 June 2016 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK) Completed Type of project: Regional NEFAB / NEFRA FRA scenario 8, implement seamless FRA volume across all NEFAB States and DK/SE FAB. L3: AOM21.2 Other links: SESAR Deployment Programme 2015 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Present or improved safety Present or improved environmental impact Present or additional capacity Improved cost efficiency for airspace users Common project management, simulations, training and deployment LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 29 Released Issue
NEFRA Phase 2 Organisation(s): Schedule: 31.12.2017 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK) Ongoing, on time Type of project: Regional NEFAB / NEFRA scenario 8, ATM systems upgrade and further IFPS integration among participating ANSPs L3: AOM21.2 Other links: SESAR Deployment Program 2015 Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: Present or improved safety Present or improved environmental impact Present or additional capacity Improved cost efficiency for airspace users Common project management, simulations, training and deployment LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 30 Released Issue
Subregional SWIM MET deployment to support NEFRA (A & B) (2015_025_AF5_A) Organisation(s): Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE) Schedule: 01/11/2016 31/12/2018 Status: Description: Link and references ATM MP links: Other links: Project included in RP2 Performance Plan: Project included in DP2016: Performance contribution Safety: Environment: Capacity: Costefficiency: Operational efficiency: Cooperation Activities: Project Leader: Finnish Meteorological Institute Type of project: Regional Contributors: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute The project implementation scope depend on the coordinated work of all 3 partners (Finnish Meteorological Institute, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Danish Meteorological Institute) and is split into a cohesion and noncohesion part. Project Objective Implementation of a flexible and costeffective interoperable production and exchange of MET information for Northern European MET service providers compliant with the SWIM data formats and interfaces Demonstration and verification of costeffective multistakeholder operational deployment of SWIM for MET information Implementation and verification covering TAFs and METARs for civil airports within the geographical scope of the project, AIRMETs and SIGMETs for Sondrestrom, Kobenhavn, Sweden and Finland (part A) and Tallinn and Riga FIRs (part B), METARs and AUTO METARs for civil airports and Significant Weather Charts (SWCs) for Sweden and Finland (part A) and Estonia and Latvia (part B) covering the Scandinavian footprint Development and implementation of a central database and web services for the exchange of MET information in SWIM compliant format and easy availability to users Development and implementation of common user interfaces to facilitate the generation and monitoring of harmonised and coherent MET information Embedding and implementing the systems/applications in the operational production and monitoring chains of all project contributors INF08.1 DP: Family 5.4.1; Project 2015_025_AF5_A and 2015_025_AF5_B Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan: Name/Code in DP2016: LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 31 Released Issue
Chapter 6 Implementation Objectives Progress 6.1. State View 6.1.1. Overall Objective Implementation Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives 3; 8% 1; 3% Completed Ongoing 16; 42% Planned Late 18; 47% No Plan Not Applicable Missing Data Undefined Finland is late in implementing objectives ITYADQ, ITYFMTP and INF07. Finavia expects to be compliant with ADQ regulation by Q3/2019. The objective ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) is planned to be implemented by June 2017. INF07 is expected to be implemented in 2017. Other applicable objects are planned to be implemented according to the FOC dates. LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 32 Released Issue
6.1.2. Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature Legend: ## % = Expected completion / % Progress 100% = Objective completed = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF) = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline Optimised ATM Network Services Average implementation progress: 45% AOM13.1 AOM19.1 (PCP) AOM19.2 (PCP) AOM19.3 (PCP) FCM01 FCM03 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling ASM support tools to support AFUA ASM Management of realtime airspace data ASM Management of realtime airspace data Enhanced tactical flow management services Collaborative flight planning FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1 FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2 FCM05 (PCP) Interactive rolling NOP FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 n/a 100% 98% 48% 83% 40% 5% 10% 10% 10% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 33 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services Average implementation progress: 94% <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace ATC02.2 STCA Level 2 ATC02.8 Groundbased Safety Nets n/a 100% 100% 100% ATC07.1 AMAN tools and procedures EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100% Automated support for conflict detection, resolution ATC12.1 support information and conformance monitoring Implement, in enroute operations, information ATC15.1 exchange tools & procedures in support of basic AMAN Arrival Management extended to enroute ATC15.2 (PCP) airspace n/a 100% ATC16 ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Electronic dialogue as automated assistance ATC17 to controller during coordination and transfer ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations 100% 100% 28% ITYCOTR NAV03 (PCP) RNAV 1 NAV10 EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100% Groundground automated coordination 100% processes APV procedures 100% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 34 Released Issue
High Performing Airport Operations Average implementation progress: 93% <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 AOP04.1 ASMGCS Level 1 AOP04.2 ASMGCS Level 2 EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100% AOP05 AOP10 (PCP) AOP11 (PCP) AOP12 (PCP) AOP13 (PCP) ENV02 EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 63% Airport CDM EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100% TimeBased Separation EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Initial Airport Operations Plan EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Collaborative Environmental Management n/a n/a n/a n/a SAF11 EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport 100% Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 35 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure Average implementation progress: 33% COM10 COM11 FCM08 (PCP) INF04 INF07 ITYACID ITYADQ ITYAGDL ITYAGVCS2 ITYFMTP ITYSPI Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Extended Flight Plan Integrated briefing Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Aircraft identification Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Initial ATC airground data link services 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol Surveillance performance and interoperability <15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 70% 10% 8% 42% 7% 30% 39% 38% 86% 27% 10% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 36 Released Issue
6.1.3. ICAO ASBU Implementation The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle. These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2016 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/58 (European Air Navigation Planning Group). Legend: = Completed (during 2016 or before) = Missing planning date = Progress achieved in 2016 = Not applicable <16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B0APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance 100% B0SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (ASMGCS Level 12) 82% 100% B0FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through GroundGround Integration 81% 100% B0DATM B0ACAS Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management ACAS Improvements 24% 100% 100% B0SNET B0ACDM Increased Effectiveness of GroundBased Safety Nets Improved Airport Operations through 100% 100% B0RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN) 100% B0FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced EnRoute Trajectories 94% 100% B0NOPS B0ASUR B0CDO Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a NetworkWide view Initial capability for ground surveillance Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO) 100% 99% 86% 100% 100% B0TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En Route 38% 100% LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 37 Released Issue
6.2. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Two colour codes are used for each Implementation Objective box : o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder. (*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code: ECAC Completed No Plan EU+ Ongoing Not Applicable MultiN Planned Missing Data APT Late LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 38 Released Issue
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling 48% Ongoing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 Implementation is planned according to the timeframe. 31/12/2018 REG (By:12/2018) Aviation act revised in November 2014. Conformance analysis as a part of EUROAT implementation has been completed. FCAA EUROAT implementation and publication of Country Chapter depends on the military aviation authority's decision to extend the application of the national military aviation regulations to include foreign military aircraft. Military Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or Authority legislation possibly in cooperation with FCAA. ASP (By:12/2018) Military MIL has no ANSP role. Need for training wil be reviewed Authority after national implementation process is finished.. Implementation and training of staff planned for the year FINAVIA 2018 MIL (By:12/2018) Military Authority Implementation will require changes to regulations and/or legislation possibly in cooperation with FCAA. 40% 40% 0% 0% 100% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2017 Planned 31/12/2018 Planned 31/12/2018 Completed 31/12/2015 AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM support tools to support AFUA Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018 83% Ongoing Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 31/12/2017 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2018) FINAVIA AOM19.2 (PCP) Existing tool will be replaced by LARA and PRISMIL by 30/11/2017 ASM Management of RealTime Airspace Data Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 83% LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATCsystem planned by 31/12/2017, compatible with NM system ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA AOM19.3 (PCP) LARA & PRISMIL connection to TopSky ATCsystem planned by 31/12/2017, compatible with NM system Full rolling ASM/ATFCM process and ASM information sharing Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 40% LARA & PRISMIL are about to become operational by 31/12/2017, enabling AOM19.3 requirements before required FOC date 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA LARA & PRISMIL are about to become operational by 31/12/2017, enabling AOM19.3 requirements 5% Ongoing 31/12/2017 40% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2017 5% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Ongoing 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 39 Released Issue
AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable NEFAB wide continues FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL95 to FL660. ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA % % Not Applicable Not Applicable AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 NEFAB wide continous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction. ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA NEFAB wide continous FRA 7/24 was implemented 12th Nov 2015, in the Finnish airspace covering airspace from FL095 to FL660. Further North European multi FAB FRA Borealis is under construction. Borealis FRA Implementati on (Part 2) / Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 1 / Borealis FRA Part 2, Phase 2 / Borealis Free Route Airspace (Part 1) / NEFAB FRA / NEFRA Phase 1 / NEFRA Phase 2 100% Completed 100% 12/11/2015 Completed 12/11/2015 AOP04.1 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011 100% Completed EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 31/03/2011 REG (By:12/2010) FCAA ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 100% ASP (By:12/2011) ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. Currently EFHK FINAVIA has got ASMGCS Level 2 with 3 SMRs and Mode S Multilateration System. Systems fulfill agreed performance specifications and are in operational use 100% APO (By:12/2010) HELSINKI VANTAA ASMGCS Level 1 implemented in 2011. 100% Airport Completed 31/03/2011 Completed 31/03/2011 Completed 31/03/2011 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 40 Released Issue
AOP04.2 Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A SMGCS) Level 2 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 63% Ongoing EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport HelsinkiVantaa Airport ASMGCSsystem fulfills ETSI EN 303 2131 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 2131 v1.2.1 specifications being ASMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway 31/12/2017 incursion and monitoring logic which are not yet in operational use. ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2017) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport HelsinkiVantaa Airport ASMGCSsystem fulfills ETSI EN 303 2131 v1.1.1 and ETSI EN 303 2131 v1.2.1 specifications being ASMGCS Level 2 compatible. That includes also runway incursion and monitoring logic which are not yet in operational use. The equipment installed is a Mode Sbased vehicle transponder with GPSreceiver 50% 100% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Completed 30/06/2010 AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 100% Completed EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport CDM was implemented at HelsinkiVantaa in 2012 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2016) FINAVIA CDM was implemented at HelsinkiVantaa in 2012 100% APO (By:12/2016) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport CDM was implemented in 2012. 100% AOP10 (PCP) Time Based Separation not applicable EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable REG (By:12/2023) ASP (By:12/2023) AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan not applicable EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA % APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport % % % Completed 31/12/2012 Completed 31/12/2012 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 41 Released Issue
AOP12 (PCP) Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring not applicable EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) Not applicable ASP (By:12/2020) APO (By:12/2020) AOP13 (PCP) Automated assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing not applicable EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport (Outside Applicability Area) EFHK is a non PCP airport REG (By:12/2023) FCAA ASP (By:12/2023) Applicability Area: 25 PCP Airports % % % FINAVIA % Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012 ASP (By:01/2013) FINAVIA Implemented in 2012 100% Completed 30/04/2012 ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 100% Completed EFHK Helsinki Vantaa Airport Finavia's cooperation with operators is continuous. Procedures are planned according to environmental etc. demands. 31/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2016) As an Airport operator and Air Navigation Service Provider Finavia is having a constant cooperation with FINAVIA Airline Operators. The cooperation has been in place for several years. APO (By:12/2016) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport CEM issues are discussed frequently trough the year together with airport and aircraft operators. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2009 Completed 31/12/2012 30/11/2010 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 42 Released Issue
FCM03 Collaborative flight planning Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 98% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/12/2017 Full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2017 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2017) FINAVIA FCM04.1 Functionality installed and available but problems so far at NM within processing of AFPmessages correctly, causes that full implementation of collaborative flight planning is planned for the year 2017 according to revised plan for FCM03 Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) not applicable 98% N/A ASP (By:10/2017) FINAVIA N/A % FCM04.2 (PCP) Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) phase 2 Initial operational capability: 01/11/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2. ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA FCM05 (PCP) Planning started, for Finland STAM 1 or 2 has not been a requirement before year 2016, though many of STAM 1 functionalities are operational and will form a basis for STAM 2. Interactive rolling NOP Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 % 10% Plans exist to implement the interactive rolling NOP, project planning started 2016. Application for INEA funding is under progress, within the scope of SESAR Deployment Programme 2015. ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA APO (By:12/2021) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport FCM06 (PCP) Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021 Plans exist to implement the rolling NOP. Intention is to implement the full integration of AOP with the NOP by 31/12/2021 Traffic complexity assessment Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 10% 10% Ongoing 31/12/2017 Not Applicable Not Applicable 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 Ongoing 31/12/2021 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 Ongoing 31/12/2021 Ongoing 31/12/2021 10% Ongoing Planned according to objective FOC. 31/12/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA Initial research launched. 10% Ongoing 31/12/2021 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 43 Released Issue
FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021 10% Ongoing Project started, FOC planned Q1/2021 30/03/2021 ASP (By:12/2021) FINAVIA Project started, FOC planned Q1/2021 10% Ongoing 30/03/2021 INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (etod) Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 8% Ongoing Full operational capability: 31/05/2018 Planning in progress. The objective is expected to be completed on time. 31/05/2018 REG (By:05/2018) Planning in progress. A project group consisting of all FCAA relevant stakeholders has been established to create the National TOD Policy and implementation programme. ASP (By:05/2018) 3% FINAVIA Project in progress 25% APO (By:05/2018) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Planning in progress 0% Late 31/05/2018 Ongoing 31/05/2018 Planned 31/05/2018 ITYACID Aircraft identification Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 30% Ongoing System capability: 02/01/2020 Planning in progress, see ASP comment. 02/01/2020 ASP (By:01/2020) FINAVIA Project in progress, the A/C link and ACID capability is technically ready (DAPS, Downlinked Aircraft ParameterS) for ATMsystem TopSky. The operational use of ACID is planned to happen country wide by 31/12/2017 when the WAM and ModeS sensors will cover entire Finland FIR. With WAM system there has been delays due to financial problems of the system provider. 30% Ongoing 02/01/2020 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 44 Released Issue
ITYADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 39% Late Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017 The requirements of this objective are considered extremely challenging to meet by 2017. 30/06/2019 REG (By:06/2017) The requirements of this objective are considered FCAA extremely challenging to meet by 2017. ASP (By:06/2017) Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and FINAVIA implementation. A special jointproject team was set up during year 2015 to plan and full fill the requirement by 30 Jun 2017. APO (By:06/2017) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Discussions are ongoing between the ASP, the APO, the NSA and Ministry of Transportation about the scope and implementation. A special jointproject team was set up during year 2015 to plan and full fill the requirement by 30 Jun 2017. 62% 51% 10% Ongoing 30/06/2017 Late 30/06/2019 Late 30/06/2017 ITYAGDL Initial ATC airground data link services Entry into force: 06/02/2009 38% Ongoing ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020 ATCAir Ground Data Link services requirements will come into force in the southern part of Finland from 05/02/2018 which is the target date for implementation. Finavia is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements with other 05/02/2018 NEFAB countries, relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by Finavia. REG (By:02/2018) FCAA ASP (By:02/2018) ATCAir Ground Data Link services requirements will come into force in the southern part of Finland from 05/02/2018, which is the target date for implementation. Finavia is aware of this regulation and actions has been planned to fulfill the regulation requirements, relevant information in the national aeronautical information publication will be published by Finavia. The remaining part of AGDL, the A/G radiolink service, will be hired from ARINC and SITA depending on how the FINAVIA SESAR Deployment Manager DLS recovery plan will be put in place. MIL (By:01/2019) Military Authority No plans to equip current transporttype State aircrafts with data link capabilities. 40% 44% 0% Ongoing 05/02/2018 Ongoing 05/02/2018 No Plan LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 45 Released Issue
ITY AGVCS2 8,33 khz airground voice channel spacing below FL195 Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020 27% Ongoing Finland is planning to implement this regulation according to the given schedule 31/12/2018 REG (By:12/2018) The requirements are planned to be implemented within FCAA the given timeframe. ASP (By:12/2018) Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according FINAVIA to the objective schedule Military Authority MIL (By:12/2020) Military Authority APO (By:12/2018) Military Authority HELSINKI VANTAA Airport 38% 30% MIL has no service provision role. % All aircraft that will be in use after implementation date are equipped with 8,33kHz radios. Need for manual updates and training will be reviewed within timescale. 40% MIL has no service provision/apo role. % Finavia is planning to implement this regulation according to the objective schedule 7% Ongoing 31/12/2018 Ongoing 31/12/2018 Not Applicable Ongoing 31/12/2017 Not Applicable Ongoing 31/12/2018 ITYFMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 42% Late Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014 There are plans on implementing the FMTP by the end of June 2017. 30/06/2017 ASP (By:12/2014) FINAVIA Planned to implemented by June 2017 42% MIL (By:12/2014) Military Authority Integrated civilmilitary airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. % Late 30/06/2017 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 46 Released Issue
ITYSPI Surveillance performance and interoperability Entry into force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 86% Ongoing ELS in transporttype State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADSB Out in transporttype State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020 The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. All REG and ASP SloAs are completed. Remaining SloAs will be 07/06/2020 completed within the timeframe of the regulation. REG (By:02/2015) The existing surveillance chain has been operational for FCAA years and the safety assessment have been completed. ASP (By:02/2015) The existing surveillance chain has been operational for years and the safety assessment have been completed. FINAVIA (In the preceding LSSIPs there were texts about plans to introduce WAMsystems but due to various technical and commercial problems, the plans have been halted so far) MIL (By:06/2020) Military Authority NAV03 (PCP) MIL has no role in ANSP/surveillance capability issues. All transport type aircraft have MODE S capabilities and almost all will be updated to ADSB OUT within timescale. RNAV 1 Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023 100% 100% 63% Completed 31/12/2014 Completed 31/12/2014 Ongoing 07/06/2020 100% Completed PRNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. 30/06/2006 ASP (By:12/2023) FINAVIA PRNAV SIDs and STARs procedures have been implemented in Helsinki TMA. The feasibility and benefits from PRNAV in other Finnish TMAs, and furthermore in the joint adjacent Helsinki/Tallinn TMAs has been assessed in 2005 and PRNAV routes have been implemented. 100% Completed 30/06/2006 NAV10 APV procedures Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 100% Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2016 APV/Baro VNAV procedures will be published by the end of year 2016. 30/11/2016 REG (By:04/2016) Finland applies criteria published by EASA. Specifically, FCAA AMC 2026 and AMC 2027. ASP (By:12/2016) 100% FINAVIA 100% Completed 25/08/2016 Completed 30/11/2016 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 47 Released Issue
SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 100% Completed Full operational capability: 31/01/2018 Finland is compliant with the relevant parts of EAPPRE. 31/12/2015 REG (By:01/2018) The appropriate parts of the European Action Plan for the FCAA Prevention of Runway Excursions have been implemented utilising the Finnish Aviation Safety Plan. ASP (By:12/2014) 100% FINAVIA Requirements fulfilled during 2014. 100% APO (By:12/2014) HELSINKI VANTAA Airport Requirements fulfilled during 2014. 100% Military Authority 100% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 31/12/2014 Completed 31/12/2014 Completed 31/12/2014 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 48 Released Issue
6.3. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) level 2 100% Completed Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013 Implemented in 2012. 30/04/2012 ASP (By:01/2013) FINAVIA Implemented in 2012 100% Completed 30/04/2012 ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 100% Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2015 The requirements stemming from Regulation (EU) No 1332/2011 of 16 December 2011 laying down common airspace usage requirements and operating procedures for airborne collision avoidance have been 31/12/2015 implemented in Finland. REG (By:12/2015) FCAA All REG SloA's are completed. 100% ASP (By:03/2012) Training completed in 2012. ACAS performance FINAVIA monitoring has been in place since 2008. MIL (By:12/2015) Transport type aircraft equipped with TCAS II 7.0 or Military TCAS I. No update planned. ACAS II functionalities are Authority trained during flight cadets training for tactical aircraft. 100% 100% Completed 31/12/2015 Completed 31/05/2012 Completed 31/03/2012 FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 100% Completed Full operational capability: 31/12/2006 Objective has been completed. 30/11/2010 ASP (By:07/2014) FINAVIA Completed 2010 100% Completed 30/11/2010 INF04 Implement integrated briefing Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 10% Late Full operational capability: 31/12/2012 Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in 2017 31/12/2017 ASP (By:12/2012) FINAVIA Integrated briefing function is expected to be implemented in 2017. However, even if the integrated service is not yet automated, the integrated output is presently carried out manually by the briefing unit in order to give the requested output for the pilot. 10% Late 31/12/2017 LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 49 Released Issue
ITYCOTR Implementation of groundground automated coordination processes Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 100% Completed For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 The system requirements derived from the regulations 1032/2006 and 30/2009 are expected to be finalized within the timeframe of the regulations. 30/12/2012 ASP (By:12/2012) Planned according to the regulations (1032/2006, FINAVIA 29/2009 and 30/2009). MIL (By:12/2012) Military Authority Integrated civilmilitary airspace. Military has no service provision role in Finnish aviation. 100% % Completed 30/12/2012 Not Applicable LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 50 Released Issue
ANNEXES Annex A Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process LSSIP Coordination LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name LSSIP Focal Point for Finland Finnish Transport Safety Iiro KESKIVÄLI Agency LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Finnish Transport Safety Iiro KESKIVÄLI Agency LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Finavia Corporation Pekka VIRTANEN LSSIP Focal Point for Airport LSSIP Focal Point for Military Military Aviation Authority Heikki KUORELAHTI and Timo VÄHÄMÄKI EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support Function Directorate Name LSSIP Contact Person for Finland DPS/PEPR Luca DELL ORTO Implementation Objectives Implementation Objective EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator National Stakeholder Specialist AOM13.1 O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM19.1 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Marko IHANUS AOM19.2 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Marko IHANUS AOM19.3 G. ACAMPORA O. ALFARO Marko IHANUS AOM21.1 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Christer BJÖRKMAN AOM21.2 C. BRAIN A. DYBOWSKA Christer BJÖRKMAN LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 51 Released Issue
AOP04.1 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP04.2 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Jari TOIVONEN AOP05 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Timo SUORTO AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE F. ROOSELEER Heikki ISOMAA AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Heikki ISOMAA AOP13 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC N/A ATC02.8 B. BAKKER F. ROOSELEER Jari TOIVONEN ATC07.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL ORTO Sakari YLINIEMI ATC15.1 P. CONROY L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ATC15.2 P. HOP L. DELL ORTO Jari TOIVONEN ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL ORTO Heikki ISOMAA COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU J. PINTO Osmo NIEMINEN COM11 L. POPESCU J. PINTO Osmo NIEMINEN COM12 W. JANSSENS J. PINTO Osmo NIEMINEN ENV01 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA ENV02 S. MAHONY B. HILL Heikki ISOMAA FCM03 C. BOUMAN O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM04.1 P. HOP O. CIOARA Erik Berg FCM04.2 P. HOP O. CIOARA Erik Berg FCM05 I. MENDES VIDEIRA O. CIOARA Jari TOIVONEN FCM06 P. HOP F. ROOSELEER Heikki ISOMAA FCM07 C. BOUMAN O. ALFARO Jussi KIVELÄ FCM08 K. BREIVIK O. CIOARA Sakari YLINIEMI FCM09 R. STEVENS O. CIOARA N/A INF07 A. PETROVSKY AP. FRANGOLHO Jussi KIVELÄ INF08.1 I. MENDES VIDEIRA AP. FRANGOLHO Osmo NIEMINEN INF08.2 I. MENDES VIDEIRA AP. FRANGOLHO Osmo NIEMINEN ITYADQ M. UNTERREINER AP. FRANGOLHO Jussi KIVELÄ ITYAGVCS2 J. POUZET B. HILL Osmo NIEMINEN ITYFMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Jari TOIVONEN ITYACID A. DESMONDKENNEDY O. CIOARA Jani Suomela ITYSPI M. BORELY O. CIOARA Jani Suomela ITYAGDL S. DISSING B. HILL Jari Toivonen NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC P. VRANJKOVIC Samu Tuparinne NAV10 R. FARNWORTH P. VRANJKOVIC Samu Tuparinne SAF11 S. LAWRENCE F. ROOSELEER Heikki ISOMAA LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 52 Released Issue
Annex B National Stakeholders Organisation charts Finnish Transport Safety Agency LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 53 Released Issue
Finavia Corporation 2016 Finnish Air Force LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 54 Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2016 Finland 55 Released Issue