Fly Quiet Report. Presented at the June 7, 2017 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting

Similar documents
Fly Quiet Report. Presented at the November 2, 2016 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting

Fly Quiet Report. Presented at the August 3, 2016 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting

Fly Quiet Report. Presented at the August 2, 2017 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting

Airport Director s Report

Airport Director s Report

Presented at the June 2, Airport Community Roundtable Meeting. SFO Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

Airport Director s Report. Presented at the April 6, 2016 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting SFO Aircraft Noise Abatement Office October 2015

Fly Quiet Report. 3 rd Quarter November 27, Prepared by:

Presents. OnDuty Support Systems LLC All rights reserved. 1

Massport CAC Meeting December 07, 2017

Noise 101 Series The Fly Quiet Program Jon C. Long Fly Quiet Awards June 2013

Gate Name Operator Operator Name

Technical Report. Aircraft Overflight and Noise Analysis. Brisbane, California. December Prepared by:

Welcome to Public Information Workshop 1. San Francisco International Airport 14 CFR Part 150 Study Update Noise Compatibility Program Report

NOISE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE January 16, Audio recordings are made of this meeting

Airport Community Roundtable. May 16, 2018 Meeting

KPGD HIGH. Punta Gorda Airport Punta Gorda, Florida, United States. Diagram #1: KPGD Departures. NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack

Frankfurt (EDDF) Pilot Briefing. Cross the Pond 2016 Westbound

ROUNDTABLE REGULAR MEETING MEETING No. 286

KTRK HIGH. Truckee Tahoe Airport Truckee, California, United States

Buchanan Field. Airport Planning Program. FAR Part 150 Meeting. September 28, Master Plan FAR Part 150 Noise Study Strategic Business Plan

Gate Name Operator Operator Name

SFO Airport/Community Roundtable Meeting No. 300 Overview Wednesday, April 3, 2016

Determining Airport Acceptance Rate (AAR) Mexico City Airport Case Study

KOAK HIGH. Metropolitan Oakland Intl Airport Oakland, California, United States

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport Flight Tracking

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act Quarterly Operations Report

Gate Name Operator Operator Name

AIRPORT / COMMUNITY ROUNDTABLE MEETING NO. 259 OVERVIEW Wednesday, June 4, 2008

The Noise & Environmental office reviews airline schedules and night-time performance of the airlines operating at the Airport.

Technical Report. Aircraft Noise Analysis. Portola Valley and Woodside, California. July Prepared by: Aircraft Noise Abatement Office

Airport Community Roundtable. September 19, 2018 Meeting

Quieter Skies Report. Partnership for. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Prepared by: Broward County Aviation Department

Departure Noise Mitigation Review. Dr Darren Rhodes Civil Aviation Authority 18 July

St. Paul Downtown Airport (STP)

LAX/Community Noise Roundtable

O Hare Noise Compatibility Commission Technical Committee April 19, Proposed Interim Fly Quiet Runway Rotation Plan

Pacifica. Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aircraft Noise 101. November 12, 2014

KSFO HIGH. San Francisco Intl Airport San Francisco, California, United States. Diagram #1: SFO_FlyQuiet_Large All Aircraft Categories / All Runways

KPAO HIGH. Palo Alto Arpt Of Santa Clara Co Airport Palo Alto, California, United States Diagram #1: Noise Abatement Procedures All Runways

Noise Oversight Committee

Recommendations for Northbound Aircraft Departure Concerns over South Minneapolis

Complaint Date & Time Complainant City Operator Flight No. Aircraft Response (24 Hours) Type

KSMO HIGH. Santa Monica Muni Airport Santa Monica, California, United States

QUARTERLY NOISE REPORT For: California Department of Transportation

During all other times operators are required to use the designated run-up locations for run-ups above idle power.

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act Quarterly Operations Report

Chapter 4 Noise. 1. Airport noise

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act Quarterly Operations Report

Airport Noise Management System Quarterly Report. Chicago Midway International Airport

Noise Oversight Committee

REVIEW OF GOLD COAST AIRPORT Noise Abatement Procedures

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

ROUNDTABLE REGULAR MEETING MEETING No. 285

Norman Y. Mineta San José International Airport 2017 Annual Noise Report

AIRPORT NOISE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (ANAC) MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, April 26, 2017, 4:00 p.m.

FRENCH VALLEY AIRPORT (F70) Sky Canyon Dr. Murrieta, CA. Phone: Riverside FAA FSDO Complaint Line: (951)

Permanent Noise Monitoring Act Quarterly Operations Report

Airport Noise Management System

Noise Oversight Committee

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

SFO Tailored Arrivals Environmental Analysis

Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport Annual Noise Report

TORONTO PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT NOISE MANAGEMENT

Quiet Climb. 26 AERO First-Quarter 2003 January

Airport Noise Management System Chicago Midway International Airport

APPENDIX H 2022 BASELINE NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOUR

SUBJECT: 2016 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT DATE: April 18, 2017 INFORMATION

Introduction to ROPS. Runway Overrun Prevention System. Presented by: Jerome JOURNADE ROPS Technical Manager

DCA Airport Noise. MWAA WG Dec 15, 2016

Long Beach Airport. A Sound Approach. for a Quieter Community

Noise Abatement 101. July 13, Regular Board Meeting / August 7, 2014 Hillsborough County Aviation Authority

KAPF HIGH. Naples Muni Airport Naples, Florida, United States

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

PLAN Anoka County - Blaine Airport

Measuring, Managing and Mitigating Aircraft Related Noise

KSBP HIGH. San Luis County Rgnl Airport San Luis Obispo, California, United States

Partnership for Quieter Skies Report

Update Noise Management Action Plan. 10 Commitments to our Neighbours June 21, 2018 CENAC meeting Cynthia Woods

NOISE ABATEMENT PLAN. St. Paul Downtown Airport Holman Field

Community Noise Consortium Meeting (CNC)

PUBLIC INFORMATION WORKSHOP #4 / PUBLIC HEARING November 8 / 9, 2006

KVNY HIGH. Van Nuys Airport Van Nuys, California, United States

Canberra Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

RTIA Runway Utilization Discussion Paper

Quieter Skies Report. Partnership for. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Prepared by: Broward County Aviation Department

Arriving and departing aircraft at Edinburgh Airport

UPDATE ON THE 6 IDEAS (1-4) NAV CANADA

KPDX HIGH. Portland Intl Airport Portland, Oregon, United States

SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MEMORANDUM

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2017

Supplemental Proposals to Revising the

Van Nuvs Airport Noise Programs Overview

This section sets forth all Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) noise abatement procedures, restrictions, and regulations involving aircraft operations.

Benefits Assessment for Tailored Arrivals

Perth Noise Abatement Procedures - Change to Preferred Runways

Partnership for Quieter Skies Report

THE BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA AIRPORT AUTHORITY S UPDATE REGARDING ITS NOISE IMPACT AREA REDUCTION PLAN AND ITS PART 161 STUDY SECOND QUARTER 2015

NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures

Transcription:

Images used by SFO are Rights Managed Images and have specific usages defined. Please see photography usage guidelines document for more information and only use approved images on SFO Widen Media Collective. Fly Quiet Report Presented at the June, 0 Airport Community Roundtable Meeting Aircraft Noise Abatement Office First Quarter 0

s is an Airport Community Roundtable initiative implemented by the Aircraft Noise Abatement Office. Its purpose is to encourage individual airlines to operate as quietly as possible at SFO. The program promotes a participatory approach in complying with noise abatement procedures and objectives by grading an airline s performance and by making the scores available to the public via newsletters, publications, and public meetings. Fly Quiet offers a dynamic venue for implementing new noise abatement initiatives by praising and publicizing active participation rather than a system that admonishes violations from essentially voluntary procedures. Program Goals The overall goal of the is to influence airlines to operate as quietly as possible in the San Francisco Bay Area. A successful can be expected to reduce both single event and total noise levels around the airport. Program Reports Fly Quiet reports communicate results in a clear, understandable format on a scale of 0-0, zero being poor and ten being good. This allows for an easy comparison between airlines over time. Individual airline scores are computed and reports are generated each quarter. These quantitative scores allow airline management and flight personnel to measure exactly how they stand compared to other operators and how their proactive involvement can positively reduce noise in the Bay Area. Program Elements Currently the rates jets and regional jets on six elements : the overall noise quality of each airline s fleet operating at SFO, an evaluation of single overflight noise level exceedences, a measure of how well each airline complies with the preferred nighttime noise abatement runways, assessment of airline performance to the Gap and Shoreline Departures, and over the bay approaches to runways 8L and 8R.

SFO s Fly Quiet Ratings Fleet Noise Quality The Fleet Noise Quality Rating evaluates the noise contribution of each airline s fleet as it actually operates at SFO. s generally own a variety of aircraft types and schedule them according to both operational and marketing considerations. Fly Quiet assigns a higher rating or grade to airlines operating quieter, new generation aircraft, while airlines operating older, louder technology aircraft would rate lower. The goal of this measurement is to fairly compare airlines not just by the fleet they own, but by the frequency that they schedule and fly particular aircraft into SFO. Noise Exceedance Eliminating high-level noise events is a long-standing goal of the Airport and the Airport Community Roundtable. As a result the Airport has established single event maximum noise level limits at each noise-monitoring site. These thresholds were set to identify aircraft producing noise levels higher than are typical for the majority of the operations. Whenever an aircraft overflight produces a noise level higher than the maximum decibel value established for a particular monitoring site, the noise threshold is surpassed and a noise exceedance occurs. An exceedance may take place during approach, takeoff, or possibly during departure ground roll before lifting off. Noise exceedances are logged by the exact operation along with the aircraft type and airline name. Nighttime Preferential Runway Use SFO s Nighttime Preferential Runway Use program was developed in 988. Although the program cannot be used 00% of the time because of winds, weather, and other operational factors, the Airport, the Community Roundtable, the FAA, and the s have all worked together to maximize its use when conditions permit. The program is voluntary; compliance is at the discretion of the pilot in command. The main focus of this program is to maximize flights over water and minimize flights over land and populated areas between :00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Fortunately, because airport activity levels are lower late at night, it is feasible to use over-water departure procedures more frequently than would be possible during the day. Reducing nighttime noise especially sleep disturbance is a key goal of SFO s aircraft noise abatement program. Shoreline Departure Quality Aircraft departing SFO using Runways 8L and 8R are also considered by the Fly Quiet grading system whenever they use the Shoreline Departure Procedure. This predominately VFR (visual flight rules) departure steers aircraft to the northeast shortly after takeoff in an attempt to keep aircraft and aircraft noise away from the residential communities located to the northwest of SFO. By keeping aircraft east of Highway 0 the majority of the overflights will be experienced by industrial and business parks instead of residential areas. In order to evaluate each airline s performance when flying a Shoreline Departure, a corridor was established using Interstate 0 (green colored flight tracks) as a reference point. The corridor runs north along 0, beginning approximately one-mile north-northwest of the end of Runways 8L and 8R and continuing up into the City of Brisbane. Departures west of 0 are scored marginal or poor depending on their location. Gap Departure Quality Aircraft departing SFO using Runways 8L and 8R frequently depart straight out using a procedure known as the Gap Departure. This procedure directs air traffic to fly a route that takes them over the area northwest of the airport over the cities of South San Francisco, San Bruno, Daly City, and Pacifica. In an attempt to mitigate noise in this specific area, the Gap Departure Quality Rating has been included as a category in the Fly Quiet Program. Since higher is quieter, aircraft altitudes are recorded along the departure route. s are assigned at specified points or gates set approximately one mile apart, with the higher aircraft receiving higher scores. Foster City Arrival Quality The Arrival Quality Rating is the latest addition to the. In an effort to further reduce nighttime noise in neighboring communities, this rating is designed to maximize over-bay approaches to Runways 8 between :00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. s arriving to Runways 8 during these hours are assessed based on which approach flight path was used. Over-the-bay approaches are rated good (green colored flight tracks), versus over-the-communities which are rated poor. Revised date: 5/5/09

Fly Quiet Summary Report - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Fleet Noise Quality Noise Nighttime Exceedance Runway Use Departures Shoreline Gap Arrivals Foster City Final Fly Quiet Rating VIR 9.4 0.00 - - 8.8-9.4 CSN 9.6 9.8 - -.68-8.96 DLH 9.04 9.5 - - 6.8-8.55 ANA.5 9.9 - -.80-8.9 NCA 9.8 8.0 0.00 -.6 5.58 8.5 SAS 8. 9.98 - - 5.99-8.05 JAL. 9.98 - - 6.55 -.89 SCX 5.8 9. 8.89 9.4 6.8 6.00. ETD.5 9. - - 6.49 -.6 CES 6.5 9.98 - - 6.56 -.56 SWR.95 9.8 - - 4.8 -.55 CPZ 0.00 9.89.96 9. 6.4 5.6.54 SKW 0.00 9.9 6.5.6 5.86 5.4.50 AFR.0 0.00 - - 5.8 -.50 KLM 9.0 0.00 -.5 9. -.44 FDX.86 9.6 0.00.86 5.9 6.6. CCA 9.5 9.9.6-8.09 -.0 DAL 6.5 9.80 5.56 6.68 6.9.9.0 ACA 5.5 9.5 5. 8.6 5.9 6.86.06 AMX 5.8 9.09 4.80 0.00 6.95 5.00 6.94 SWA 5.80 9.84. 9.5 5.8 6.8 6.6 JBU 4.9 9.85 6.9 6.95 5.0.6 6.4 ASA 5.08 9.86 4.54 9. 6.8 4.9 6.4 VRD 4.94 9.8 5. 8.8 4.54 6.0 6.65 FFT 5.4 9.6 5.9 8.45.66.8 6.5 TAI 4.95 9.0 4.5 8. 6.40 5. 6.45 VOI 4.85 9.8.8-9.58 5.00 6.4 AAL 4.89 9.8 5.6...4 6.40 UAL 5.84 9. 4.6 6.48 5.6 6.5 6. AIC.5 8.69 -.50 8.49 5.00 6. KAL 9.66.8. - 5.94 5.00 6. UAE 0.00 9.98-0.00 4. - 6.0 EIN 4.05 9.9 - -.5-5.86 GTI 4. 8.6 5..00. 5. 5.84 ANZ 6.6 9.8 0.00-6.9-5.84 6.50 SFO AVERAGE Page

Fly Quiet Summary Report - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Fleet Noise Quality Noise Nighttime Exceedance Runway Use Departures Shoreline Gap Arrivals Foster City Final Fly Quiet Rating WOW 4.05 9.0 0.00 6.6 8.59-5.80 AAR 4.80 6.64.64-8.5 5. 5. SIA 8. 8..0-4.88-5. CPA.5..84-6.48 5.00 5.64 CAL 5.58 8.4.9-6.46 5.00 5.48 BAW.4 9.8-0.00 4.60-5.45 EVA 6.95 8.0.08-4.4 5.00 5.4 CMP 5.8 9.9.54 4.58.4 5.54 5.40 FJI 4.05 8.66 0.00 -. - 5.0 HAL 4.04 9.56 0.00-6. 5.00 4.96 PAL.4 8.4 0.00-4. 5.00 4.90 THY.5 9.89 0.00 0.00.4 5.00 4.08 QFA.4 0.00 0.00-6. -.9 CKS.4 0. 0.00 -. 5.00.9 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 SFO Average 6.58 9.0.59 6. 6.09 5. 6.50 Page

Fleet Noise Quality - st Quarter 0 Nationwide Fleet Noise Quality Rating San Francisco Average Daily Jet Operations January to March, 0 Fleet Noise Quality Rating UAE.89 SKW 0.00 CPZ 0.00 NCA.90 KAL 4.05 VIR 5.84 CSN 5.64 KLM 4.6 CCA.46 DLH 6.09 SIA 5.9 SAS 4.96 SWR 5. BAW 4.4 PAL 5.09 ANA 5.4 CPA 4.8 THY 6.80 AIC 4. ETD 0.00 JAL 4.0 AFR 5.49 EVA 5.05 ANZ 4.00 DAL 4.9 CES 4.6 UAL 5.8 AMX 5.54 CMP 6.46 SCX 5.8 SWA 5.0 CAL.6 85 58 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.8 9.66 9.4 9.6 9.0 9.5 9.04 8. 8..95.4.4.5.5.5.5.5..0 6.95 6.6 6.58 6.5 6.5 5.84 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.80 5.58 Page

Nationwide Fleet Noise Quality Rating San Francisco Average Daily Jet Operations Fleet Noise Quality Rating ACA 6.5 9 5.5 FFT 6.4 4 5.4 ASA 5.0 5.08 TAI 5.8 4.95 VRD 5. 54 4.94 AAL.94 5 4.89 VOI 0.00 4.85 AAR.9 4.80 JBU 6. 4.9 GTI 0.9 4. EIN 4.05 4.05 FJI 0.00 0 4.05 WOW 0.00 4.05 HAL 6. 4.04 FDX.80.86 CKS 0.60 0.4 QFA.4.4 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 AVERAGE 4.0 0 6.58 Page 4

6 0 January to March, 0 Noise Exceedance Rating Report - st Quarter 0 Noise Exceedances Noise Exceedances Quarterly Operations Exceedances per 000 Operations Noise Exceedance Quality Rating AFR 0 6 0 0.00 KLM 0 84 0 0.00 VIR 0 0 0 0.00 CES 4 4 9.98 SAS 8 6 9.98 UAE 80 6 9.98 JAL 9 6 9.98 SKW 4 8,99 9.9 EIN 8 9.9 ANA 8 9.9 CPZ 58, 5 9.89 THY 4 5 5 9.89 VRD 89 9,4 0 9.8 ASA 95,9 9.86 JBU 06,045 5 9.85 SWA 9,96 8 9.84 SWR 80 9 9.8 VOI 80 9 9.8 CSN 9 9 9.8 ANZ 8 9 45 9.8 BAW 6 5 45 9.8 DAL 9 4,099 4 9.80 AAL 9 6,84 5 9.8 FFT 4 55 5 9.6 DLH 0 4 58 9.5 ACA 95,60 59 9.5 UAL,805 8,489 6 9. SCX 9 66 9. WOW 8 4 0 9.0 FDX 60 88 9.6 HAL 6 0 9.56 CCA 4 4 4 9.9 ETD 0 0 8 9. CMP 6 89 9.9 AMX 5 9.09 Page 5

Noise Exceedance Rating Report - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Noise Exceedances Noise Exceedances Quarterly Operations Exceedances per 000 Operations Noise Exceedance Quality Rating TAI 5 6 9.0 9.0 NCA 4 9 0 8.0 AIC 4 54 05 8.69 FJI 5 6 8.66 GTI 94 90 4 8.6 CAL 6 5 68 8.4 SIA 40 60 89 8. EVA 5 8 95 8.0 PAL 86 98 44 8.4 CPA 40 59. KAL 0 50 65.8 AAR 84 8 6.64 CKS 54 5 60 0. QFA 54 5 9 0.00 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 TOTAL 5,64 94,568 SFO AVERAGE 9.0 Page 6

Nighttime Preferential Runway Use - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Nighttime Departures ( :00 am to 6:00 am ) 0L/R 8L/R Shoreline 0L/R 8L/R Straight Nighttime Runway Use Rating FDX NCA SCX SKW JBU FFT GTI ACA VRD AAL DAL AMX ASA UAL TAI CPZ AAR CMP SWA VOI KAL EVA CAL CPA CCA SIA ANZ CKS FJI HAL PAL QFA THY 6 4 6 0 8 5 4 90 5 44 49 6 8 48 6 8 9 00% 0% 0% 0% 0.00 00% 0% 0% 0% 0.00 6% % 0% 0% 8.89 50% 0% 8% % 6.5 4% % 4% % 6.9 0% 8% % 0% 5.9 5% 0% 0% 4% 5. 4% 0% 4% 4% 5. 4% 4% 4% 9% 5. 4% % % 6% 5.6 % % % % 5.56 6% 0% 6% 8% 4.80 % 9% 66% 4% 4.54 % 5% 4% % 4.6 % 4% % % 4.5 6% 0% 0% 4%.96 6% 0% 0% 64%.64.59 4% 6% 0% 59%.54 % 0% 8% 0%. % 0% % 50%.8 8% 0% 0% %. % 0% 0% 9%.08 9% 0% 0% 8%.9 8% 0% 0% 8%.84 % 0% 0% 8%.6 % 0% 0% 8%.0 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 Page

Nighttime Preferential Runway Use - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Nighttime Departures ( :00 am to 6:00 am ) 0L/R 8L/R Shoreline 0L/R 8L/R Straight Nighttime Runway Use Rating WOW 0% 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 TOTAL 98 SFO AVERAGE 6% 6% % 5%.59 Page 8

Shoreline Departure Rating - st Quarter 0 January to March,0 Shoreline Departures Successful Marginal Poor Shoreline Departure Rating AMX CPZ SWA SCX ASA VRD ACA FFT TAI FDX AAL SKW JBU DAL WOW UAL 00% 0% 0% 0.00 8 94% 6% 0% 9. 90% 0% 0% 9.5 88% % 0% 9.4 5 86% % % 9. 60 6% 4% 0% 8.8 04 5% % % 8.6 4 69% % 0% 8.45 6% % 0% 8. 4 5% 4% 0%.86 450 58% 9% %. 6 69% 5% 6%.6 46 4% 5% % 6.95 06 45% 4% % 6.68 6 % 6% 0% 6.6,55 4% 6% % 6.48 6. CMP 5% 4% % 4.58 GTI 0 0% 60% 40%.00 AIC 0% 50% 50%.50 KLM 8% 8% 85%.5 BAW 0% 0% 00% 0.00 THY 0% 0% 00% 0.00 UAE 0% 0% 00% 0.00 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 TOTAL,696 SFO AVERAGE 49% 6% 4% 6. Page 9

Gap Departure Climb Rating - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Gap Departures Gap Departure Quality Rating VOI 4 9.58 KLM 9. VIR 6 8.8 WOW 6 8.59 AIC 6 8.49 AAR 8.5 CCA 0 8.09 ANA 5.80 CSN 6.68 FJI. GTI 49. NCA 59.6 AMX 5 6.95 ANZ 9 6.9 DLH 49 6.8 ASA 9 6.8 SCX 9 6.8 DAL 6.9 CES 00 6.56 JAL 6.55 ETD 46 6.49 CPA 6.48 CAL 6.46 CPZ 9 6.4 TAI 4 6.40 HAL 46 6. QFA 64 6. 6.09 SAS 5.99 KAL 5 5.94 ACA 5.9 SKW 450 5.86 Page 0

Gap Departure Climb Rating - st Quarter 0 January to March, 0 Gap Departures Gap Departure Quality Rating SWA 68 5.8 UAL 90 5.6 FDX 6 5.9 AFR 5.8 JBU 5.0 SIA 5 4.88 SWR 6 4.8 EVA 66 4.4 BAW 4.60 VRD 90 4.54 PAL 89 4. UAE 5 4. CMP 0.4 EIN 56.5 AAL 48. FFT 4.66 THY 6.4 CKS. 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 TOTAL 54 SFO Average 6.09 Page

Foster City Arrival Rating - st Quarter 0 January to March,0 Foster City Arrivals Successful Marginal Poor Foster City Arrival Rating JBU 86 5% 4% %.6 DAL 6 48% 5% 0%.9 FFT 65 48% 5% 0%.8 AAL 409 45% 55% 0%.4 ACA 94 % 6% 0% 6.86 FDX 40 % 68% 0% 6.6 SWA 95 0% 68% % 6.8 UAL 94 4% 5% % 6.5 VRD 5 % 9% 0% 6.0 SCX 5 0% 80% 0% 6.00 5. GTI 56 4% 86% 0% 5. TAI 0 4% 86% 0% 5. NCA 6 % 88% 0% 5.58 CMP 4% 84% % 5.54 CPZ 95 5% 95% 0% 5.6 SKW 9% 8% 4% 5.4 AAR 40 % 98% 0% 5. AIC 5 0% 00% 0% 5.00 AMX 6 0% 00% 0% 5.00 CAL 0% 00% 0% 5.00 CKS 0% 00% 0% 5.00 CPA 0% 00% 0% 5.00 EVA 0% 00% 0% 5.00 HAL 0% 00% 0% 5.00 KAL 0% 00% 0% 5.00 PAL 0% 00% 0% 5.00 THY 0% 00% 0% 5.00 VOI 5 0% 00% 0% 5.00 ASA 69 0% 99% % 4.9 0 4 5 6 8 9 0 TOTAL,099 SFO AVERAGE 5% 85% 0% 5. Page