Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis February 213
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. TOTAL TRAFFIC... 2 2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS... 5 3. ATFM DELAYS... 6 4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAYS... 1 5. DAILY EVOLUTION... 11 6. ALL AIR TRANSPORT DELAYS (SOURCE: CODA)... 12 7. ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE... 13 8. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ISSUES... 13 9. NM ADDED VALUE... 14 NOTICE: All figures presented in this report are for the geographical area that is within Network Manager s responsibility (NM area). See ACC coverage on page 3. @ 213 The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) This document is published by EUROCONTROL in the interests of exchange of information. It may be copied in whole or in part, providing that the copyright notice and disclaimer are included. The information contained in the document may not be modified without prior written permission from EUROCONTROL. EUROCONTROL makes no warranty, either implied or express, for the information contained in this document, neither does it assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of this information. Operational Monitoring and Reporting (OMR) Directorate Network Management (DNM) EUROCONTROL Rue de la Fusée, 96 B-113 Brussels BELGIUM Telephone: +32 () 2-729 1155 Fax: +32 () 2-729 9189 E-mail Address: mailto:nm.ops.perf@eurocontrol.int http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/network-operations-monitoring-and-reporting DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 1
1. TOTAL TRAFFIC 32 Last 13 months average daily traffic 32 Average daily traffic for last 5 Years 3 3 28 28 26 24 22 2 18 16 2326 24991 2621 27884 29893 324 29617 29673 2745 23857 2149 2171 2273 26 24 22 2 29 21 211 212 213 In February 213, traffic decreased by 2.4% compared to February 212. Similar to the previous 3 months, traffic in February 213 was the lowest of the last 5 years. This is now a clear trend since November 212. 25 245 24 235 23 225 22 215 Average daily traffic in February for last 5 Years forecast date : 213-2 23779 23634 2443 2326 2273 29 21 211 212 213 2375 3% 2% 1% -1% -2% -3% -4% 1.9 % 1.6 % 12 months rolling traffic trend.2% -.5% -.6%-.9% -1.2% -1.7% -1.9%-2.1% -2.6%-2.8% -2.6% February 213 traffic was below the forecast. This graph shows the variation in average daily traffic for the last 12-month period relative to that for the 12-month period before. The average daily traffic from March 212 to February 213 decreased by 2.6% relative to that from March 211 to February 212. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis - February 213 2
In February 213, 8 of the top 1 airports had less traffic compared to February 212. The largest traffic increases were recorded at Istanbul Ataturk (+18.9 %), Budapest Ferihegy (+14.6%) and Istanbul Sabiha (+13.4%) airports. The largest traffic decrease (-12.8 %) was at Madrid Barajas airport as a result of overall traffic reduction in Spain in conjunction with Spanair cessation of operations in January 212. Traffic decreased at Athens airport by 11.8% and at Las Palmas airport by 11.1% due to Islas Airways ceasing operations in October 212. Only 4 of the top 1 air operators had increased traffic in February 213. Aeroflot Russian (+22.7 %) and Pegasus (+28.8 %) recorded traffic growth, with the Pegasus increase being largely attributed to a 22% fleet increase over the last year. A change in the flight designators for Turkish Airlines domestic flights has resulted in the automatic attribution of flights to unidentified operators (see below). An initial recomputation of THY flights for February shows an average daily traffic of 8 flights, a growth of 15%. (see note 1 below) Airline consolidation and restructuring explains most of the significant traffic decreases and increases: Air Nostrum (-4.6 %), Iberia (-34.7%), Finnair (-32.4 %), Olympic (-22.5 %), BAW shuttle (+28.4%) and Finnish Commuter Airlines (+44.6 %). Unidentified operators (mainly General Aviation traffic) increased by 11.2% in February 213. Exclusion of THY flights shows a decrease of -.3% to 265 flights. 1 - Note Text relating to Pegasus Airlines updated Thursday 14 th March 213. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 3
The most significant traffic increases occurred in Chisinau, Karlsruhe, Istanbul and Simferopol ACCs. The increase of 28.5% in Malta ACC is a continuation of the recovery from the 211 Libyan airspace closure. Traffic decreased significantly in Munich, Madrid, Tampere, Canarias, Seville, Palma, Makedonia, Beograde, Milano, Kiev, Ljubjana and Brindisi ACCs. The implementation of VOLMUK project in Germany continued to impact the traffic distribution to Munich (-) and Karlsruhe (+) ACCs. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 4
2. ATFM DELAY AND ATTRIBUTIONS Average daily ATFM delays AIRPORT/TMA Average daily ATFM delays AIRPORT/ TMA 6 5 4 3 2 1 2281 16875 38121 29434 4892 5195 3411 33623 3592 2416 19354 2138 14962 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 835 1456 4167 1795 2 36.4% 63.6% 27.8% 72.2% 212-2 213-2 ATFM delays decreased by 34.4% in February 213 compared to February 212. Monthly ATFM delays trend 4 33.3% 3 2 1.5% 1-2.1% -1-22.2% -2-3.8% -38.4% -3-4.2% -34.4% -4-33.8% -4. -38.4% -5-6 -47.1% -5.9% -48. -7-57.6% Comparison to same month last year Rolling 12 month trend ATFM delay trend shows a gentle decline until November but since then the trend shows a slight increase due to recent airport weather problems. Proportion of total ATFM delays 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 1273 ISTANBUL-ATATURK 1129 LONDON/HEATHROW Compared to February 212, both the airport ATFM delays and the en-route ATFM delays decreased significantly. Proportion of ATFM delay in February 213 AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTU RE, 15.8% WEATHER,.4% EVENTS, 6.3% Top 2 delay locations for ATFM delays in February 213 857 846 819 797 763 73 717 SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM FRANKFURT MAIN MUENCHEN ZURICH PARIS ALL ACC LANGEN ACC GENEVE COINTRIN DISRUPTIONS, 2.4% AIRPORT WEATHER, 48.8% ATC STAFFING, 4.4% ATC CAPACITY, 14.4% AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY, 7.6% In February, 72.2% of all ATFM delay occurred at Airports/TMA and the remaining 27.8% was en-route. 48.8% of the ATFM delays were due to airport weather. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 5 6 WIEN SCHWECHAT 546 PARIS CH DE GAULLE 354 344 BRUSSELS NATIONAL ANKARA ACC AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE WEATHER EVENTS DISRUPTIONS ATC STAFFING 3 281 251 ATC CAPACITY 234 196 196 189 These are the top 2 delay generating locations for the reporting month. Figures are the average daily delays in minutes. Istanbul Ataturk airport had the highest delays in February due to southerly winds limiting the use of the most optimum runway configuration. Twelve of the top 2 airports (London Heathrow, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Munich, Vienna, Paris CDG, Brussels, London Gatwick, Paris Orly, Oslo, Dusseldorf and Rome Fiumicino) were strongly affected by weather throughout the month with low visibility, fog, wind and snow issues. The limited use of the optimum runway configurations at Zurich airport (due to environmental constraints) plus the snow and the wind generated delays. Paris ACC s delays were caused by the implementation of airspace changes and ATC capacity issues. Langen ACC had delays due to staff shortages, ATC capacity and due to the effects of the FDPS failure in Karlsruhe on the 25 February. Geneva airport delays were due to snow and airport ATC capacity. Delays in Ankara ACC were due to reduced ATC Capacity in ORBB (Baghdad) FIR (NOTAM A178/12). Delays in Karlsruhe ACC were essentially caused by the FDPS failure on the 25 February; they also experienced staffing issues and capacity reduction due to VOLMUK implementation. Madrid ACC recorded delays due to en-route ATC capacity. KARLSRUHE UAC LONDON/GATWICK PARIS ORLY OSLO/GARDERMOEN DUESSELDORF ROME FIUMICINO MADRID ALL ACC
3. ATFM DELAYS 3.1. ATFM DELAY PER LOCATION Proportion of total ATFM delays 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 763 PARIS ALL ACC 73 LANGEN ACC 344 ANKARA ACC 3 Top 2 delay locations for en-route delays in February 213 KARLSRUHE UAC 189 186 162 157 153 MADRID ALL ACC NICOSIA ACC REIMS U/ACC The top 2 en-route delay locations generated 25. of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. The top 5 en-route delay locations generated 15.6% of the monthly total (network) ATFM delay. CANARIAS ACC/FIC GENEVA ACC 122 118 91 9 8 58 5 46 43 42 18 LISBOA ACC/UAC ZURICH ACC AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) WARSZAWA ACC WIEN ACC MUNCHEN ACC BREST U/ACC WEATHER EVENTS DISRUPTIONS ATC STAFFING ATC CAPACITY STOCKHOLM ACC MAASTRICHT UAC BARCELONA ACC ZAGREB ACC DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 6
3.2. ATFM DELAY PER DELAY GROUP Reasons for en-route delays in February 213 WEATHER DISRUPTIONS ATC STAFFING EVENTS ATC CAPACITY.4% 2.4% 4.4% 6.3% 14. 4 % 1 2 3 4 En-route delays accounted for 27.9% of all ATFM delays. 14.4% were attributed to en-route ATC capacity, 6.3% to en-route events, 4.4% to ATC staffing, 2.4% to en-route disruptions and.4% to en-route weather. The Interface Reims Paris (IRP), the impact on Ankara of capacity reduction in Baghdad, Vienna transition and COOPANS implementation in Stockholm TMA have been recorded under en-route events. En-route external disruptions were due to the FDPS failure in Karlsruhe on the 25 February. Proportion of total En-route ATC Capacity delays Top 1 delay locations for En-route ATC Capacity in February 213 25% 398 2 15% 1 5% PARIS ALL ACC 193 186 178 162 153 LANGEN ACC NICOSIA ACC MADRID ALL ACC REIMS U/ACC GENEVA ACC 118 118 CANARIAS_ACC/FIC ZURICH ACC AMSTERDAM_ACC( 91 89 ATC capacity delays increased in Paris, Langen, Madrid, Reims, Geneva and Amsterdam ACCs compared to last month, while Lisbon and Nicosia ACCs had less ATC capacity delays. Canarias and Zurich entered the top 1 list in February. Proportion of total En-route ATC Staffing delays Top delay locations for En-route ATC Staffing in February 213 1 475 8 6 4 2 67 34 11 6 5 2 LANGEN ACC WARSZAWA ACC KARLSRUHE UAC MADRID_ALL_ACC MUNCHEN ACC MAASTRICHT_UAC 245-) BREMEN ACC LISBOA ACC/UAC Proportion of total En-route Events delays 5 4 3 2 1 Top delay locations for En-route Events in February 213 355 344 PARIS ALL ACC ANKARA ACC 8 WIEN ACC 62 LANGEN ACC 41 STOCKHOLM ACC 5 1 Ankara delays were due to the capacity reduction in Baghdad FIR. 12 1 8 6 4 2 225 Average en-route daily flights >= 15 min delay 25 513 43 73 122 597 62 44 246 MUNCHEN ACC 168 16 KARLSRUHE_UAC 17 In February 213, en-route staffing was an issue mainly for Langen ACC. Airspace design changes (IRP) impacted Paris ACC. In February 213 an average of 17 flights per day had an enroute delay of at least 15 minutes. Corresponding figure in February 212 was 225 flights. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 7
3.3. ATFM DELAY PER FLIGHT En-route delays per flight (min).4.3.2.1..3 NICOSIA ACC Top 2 delay locations for en-route delays per flight in February 213.26.25.22.21.12.11.9.8.8.7.7.6.5.5 PARIS ALL ACC LANGEN ACC CANARIAS ACC/FIC ANKARA ACC LISBOA ACC/UAC GENEVA ACC MADRID ALL ACC KARLSRUHE UAC REIMS U/ACC AMSTERDAM_ACC (245-) ZURICH ACC WARSZAWA ACC WIEN ACC STOCKHOLM ACC.3.3.3.2.2 BARCELONA ACC BREST U/ACC STAVANGER ATCC MUNCHEN ACC ZAGREB ACC EN ROUTE ATC CAPACITY EN ROUTE ATC STAFFING EN ROUTE DISRUPTIONS EN ROUTE EVENTS EN ROUTE WEATHER Nicosia ACC generated the highest average en-route delay per flight, due to ATC capacity issues. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 8
3.4. ATFM DELAY YEAR-TO-DATE Proportion of total ATFM delay 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 845 PARIS ALL ACC 435 LANGEN ACC Top 2 delay locations for year-to-date en-route ATFM delay 323 35 25 195 182 168 155 123 123 116 115 87 83 72 ANKARA ACC KARLSRUHE UAC NICOSIA ACC BREST U/ACC WARSZAWA ACC REIMS U/ACC MADRID ALL ACC LISBOA ACC/UAC GENEVA ACC STOCKHOLM ACC CANARIAS ACC/FIC MUNCHEN ACC ZURICH ACC AMSTERDAM ACC(245-) 38 3 28 25 WIEN ACC SEILLE ACC BREMEN ACC BARCELONA ACC EN ROUTE ATC CAPACITY EN ROUTE ATC STAFFING EN ROUTE DISRUPTIONS EN ROUTE EVENTS EN ROUTE WEATHER The top 2 en-route delay locations generated 2.9% of the total ATFM (network) delay. The top 5 en-route delay locations generated 12.2% of the total ATFM (network) delay. En-route delays per flight 1.2 1.1 1..9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1. Monthly en-route delay per flight monitoring M ONTHLY GUIDELINE DLY/FLT YTD GUIDELINE DLY/FLT M ONTHLY ENROUTE DLY/FLT YTD ENROUTE DLY/FLT.6 Reporting month: In February, the average en-route delay per flight was.18 min/flt, which is below the monthly guideline delay * of.28 min/flt. Year-to-date daily en-route flights >= 15 min delay 3 25 2 15 1 5 In February, 16 flights per day were subject to at least 15 minutes of delay. The corresponding figure in 212 was 177 flights. 212 213 YTD: The average en-route delay per flight in 213 to date is.19 min/flt which is below the corresponding guideline value of.29 min/flt. * NM s calculation that provides the guideline en-route delay (min) requirements to achieve the annual interim target (.6 min/flight). DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 9
4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAYS 4.1. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER LOCATION Proportion of total ATFM delays 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 1273 ISTANBUL-ATATURK 1129 LONDON/HEATHROW 857 846 819 797 SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM FRANKFURT MAIN Top 2 delay locations for Airport/TMA delays in February 213 MUENCHEN ZURICH 717 GENEVE COINTRIN The top 2 Airport/TMA delay locations generated 64.9% of the monthly total ATFM (network) delay. The top 5 Airport/TMA delay locations generated 32.9% of the monthly total ATFM (network) delay. 4.2. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER DELAY GROUPS 6 WIEN SCHWECHAT 546 PARIS CH DE GAULLE 354 BRUSSELS NATIONAL 281 251 234 196 196 151 127 113 19 18 LONDON/GATWICK PARIS ORLY OSLO/GARDERMOEN DUESSELDORF ROME FIUMICINO STOCKHOLM-BROMMA LONDON/CITY AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY MANCHESTER CHAMBERY STOCKHOLM-ARLANDA Reasons for Airport/TMA delays in February 213 AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE AIRPORT WEA THER 7.6% 15.8 % 48.8% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Airport/TMA delays accounted for 72.2% of all ATFM delays, 48.8% was due to weather. Proportion of all Airport Infrastructure delays Top 1 delay locations for Airport Infrastructure 6 1234 in February 213 5 4 3 2 328 1 18 86 84 75 61 57 54 52 ISTANBUL_ATATURK ZURICH SHARM EL SHEIKH WIEN SCHWECHAT Limitations to optimum runway use at Istanbul Ataturk airport (southerly winds) and at Zurich airport (environmental constraints) continued to cause delays. LONDON/GATWICK ISTANBUL-SABIHA LONDON/CITY MUENCHEN 2 TEL_AVIV/BEN_GURION VENEZIA TESSERA Proportion of all Airport Weather delays 2 15% 1 5% Top 1 delay locations for Airport Weather in February 213 195 LONDON/HEATHROW 772 762 FRANKFURT MAIN MUENCHEN 627 SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM 514 469 WIEN SCHWECHAT ZURICH 379 354 312 246 Delays at London Heathrow, Frankfurt, Munich, Amsterdam, Vienna, Zurich, Paris CDG, Brussels, Geneva and Paris Orly were mainly due to seasonal weather: low visibility, fog, snow and winds Proportion of all Airport ATC Capacity delays Top 1 delay locations for Airport ATC Capacity in February 213 4 366 3 2 1 GENEVE COINTRIN 19 SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM 118 19 PARIS CH DE GAULLE CHAMBERY 84 69 ANNECY FRANKFURT MAIN PARIS CH DE GAULLE BRUSSELS NATIONAL GENEVE COINTRIN PARIS ORLY 39 35 34 23 Geneva had the highest delays with high levels of ski traffic. ISTANBUL-ATATURK TENERIFE SUR LONDON/HEATHROW BEAUVAIS-TILE DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 1
4.3. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY PER FLIGHT.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1. Average Airport / TMA delay (min) per flight Last 13 Months =.5 minutes Airport delays per flight (min) 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. Top 1 Airport delay per flight in February 213 YTD Situation 2.66 CHAMBERY 1.41 1.29 1.22 GENEVE COINTRIN ISTANBUL-ATATURK ZURICH.97 WIEN SCHWECHAT.89.82.81.7.66 LONDON/HEATHROW SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM MUENCHEN FRANKFURT MAIN BRUSSELS NATIONAL Average Airport/TMA delay per flight decreased from.6 minutes in February 212 to.5 minutes in February 213. 4.4. AIRPORT/TMA ATFM DELAY YEAR-TO-DATE In February Chambery and Geneva airports had the highest delay per flight, mainly due to the ski traffic. Proportion of total ATFM delays 16% 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 2295 LONDON/HEATHROW 1379 FRANKFURT MAIN 1278 SCHIPHOL_AMSTERDAM 1161 ISTANBUL-ATATURK Top 2 delay locations for year-to-date Airport/TMA delays 821 728 687 681 676 473 342 297 285 285 259 ZURICH GENEVE COINTRIN WIEN SCHWECHAT PARIS CH DE GAULLE MUENCHEN LONDON/GATWICK PARIS ORLY MADRID BARAJAS LONDON/CITY BRUSSELS NATIONAL OSLO/GARDERMOEN 147 145 136 131 99 MANCHESTER AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY AIRPORT WEATHER AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ROME FIUMICINO DUESSELDORF STOCKHOLM-BROMMA STOCKHOLM-ARLANDA The top 2 Airport/TMA delay locations generated 69.6% of the total ATFM (network) delay since the beginning of the year. The top 5 Airport/TMA delay locations generated 39.2% of the total ATFM (network) delay since the beginning of the year. 5. DAILY EVOLUTION Average delay (min) per flight in February 213 2. AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY AIRPORT WEATHER 1.5 AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE WEATHER 1. EVENTS DISRUPTIONS.5 ATC STAFFING ATC CAPACITY. 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 In February 213, there were no days with an average delay per flight at or above 2 minutes: The day with the highest average delay per flight was Monday 25 February. Airport weather delays occurred on most days in February as in January, but there were no very severe weather days (two in January): snow at Frankfurt, Dusseldorf, Paris CDG and Orly and Brussels airports; fog at Stockholm airport; low visibility at Vienna airport and thunderstorm at Rome Fiumicino airport. Karlsruhe ACC had a FDPS failure on 25 February. Langen ACC also recorded significant delays due to staffing issues. Runway configuration at Istanbul Ataturk airport continued to cause delays. Ankara ACC suffered from the capacity reduction in Baghdad FIR. En-route ATC capacity delays were registered in Madrid ACC. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 11
6. ALL AIR TRANSPORT DELAYS (Source: CODA) The analysis below is based on airline data provided to CODA by airlines (AO's). As the airline data collection for February 213 is not yet complete at the time of writing, this analysis covers the latest available 13-month period (January 212-January 213) and contains details on 56% of commercial flights in the ECAC region. ATFM delays reported by airlines are often lower than the ATFM delays calculated by the network manager (NM). ATFM delays of NM are the (flight) planned delays whereas the airlines report the actual experienced ATFM delay on departure. For instance, a flight with an ATFM delay may also have a handling delay absorbed within the ATFM delay. For the airline, a part of this delay is the ATFM delay and the rest is the handling delay. Average departure delay per flight in minutes 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Breakdow n average delay per flight Jan 213.2 Average En- Route Delay/Flight.2 Average En- Route Delay/Flight 6.4 Average primary delay 11.5 Passenger experience Airline reported en-route ATFM delay in January 213 was.2 minutes per flight which is identical the NM reported average en-route ATFM delay of.2 minutes per flight. According to airline reporting, in January 213 the average delay per flight for all-causes of delay was 11.5 minutes. The primary delay share of total all-causes delay was 57 % (or 6.6 min/flt) of which en-route delays contributed.2 min/flt. The remaining were Reactionary delays, this counted for 43% or a contribution of 4.9 min/flight. NM reported En-Route ATFM delay Primary Delay (excl En-Route) Airline Reported En-Route ATFM Delay Reactionary delay Average departure delay (min) per flight Average departure delay per flight 212/213 15 1 5 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2121 21211 21212 Average reactionary delay per flight (CODA) Average delay per flight Other Primary delay All Causes (CODA) Average ATFM en-route delay per flight (CODA) Average ATFM en-route delay per flight (NM reported) 2131 Weather delays from high winds, snow and related low visibility in January 213 increased to 2.2 minutes per flight up from.9 minutes per flight in January 212. This follows the increase of weather delays seen in December 212 to 1.8 minutes per flight up from.9 minutes per flight in December 211. Both NM and airlines reported identical en-route ATFM delays of.2 minutes per flight. Based on airline data, the reported share of reactionary delay minutes in January 213 was 43%. This is the second lowest reactionary delay share over the last 13 months (just above the 42% recorded in November 212). 1 % Percentage of delayed flights: ATFM & All Causes 25. Percentage of flights delayed on departure - ATFM DNM 8% 6% 4% 2% 2. 15. % 1. % 5.. % of flights delayed on departure: All causes The percentage of flights delayed by long ATFM delays (those exceeding 15 minutes and 3 minutes) increased to 1.9% and.9% respectively in January 213 compared to January 212 where 1.5% and.5% of flights were delayed. The percentage of flights delayed from all-causes (those exceeding 15 & 3 minutes) increased from 14.5% and 6.9% in January 212 to 17. and 9.3% in January 213 respectively. 2121 2123 2125 2127 2129 21211 2131 > 15min by ATFM Restrictions (NM ) > 3min by ATFM Restrictions (NM ) > 15min:All Causes (CODA) > 3min:All Causes (CODA) DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 12
7. ATFM SLOT ADHERENCE Average daily evolution of early and late flights 5 9. 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. In February the percentage of late non-compliant departures decreased compared to the previous months but this has been offset against the increase of early departures. Although the overall percentage of traffic departing within their Slot Tolerance Window (STW) is above the target (at least 8), there are many airports for which compliance can be improved. 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2121 21211 21212 2131 2132 Nº OF EARLY DEPARTURES Nº OF LA TE DEP A RTURES % EARLY DEPARTURES % LATE DEPARTURES The chart below shows the airports that have more than 3 regulated flights during the month with their average daily number and proportion of regulated flights that departed outside of the STW. Any airport above the red line is non-compliant with the ATFM slot adherence target (min 8) and non-compliant departures from Paris CDG, Zurich, London Heathrow, Amsterdam and Manchester airports have wider network impact. 35% Proportion of regulated flights outside the Slot Tolerance Window in February 213 3 3 25% 2 15% 6 6 4 2 6 2 6 2 2 2 3 4 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 2 4 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 5% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IZMIR-ADNAN- PARIS CH DE GAULLE ZURICH MANCHESTER ISTANBUL-ATATURK LONDON/HEATHROW HELSINKI-VANTAA SCHIPHOL AMSTERDAM PRAHA RUZYNE LYON SATOLAS DUBLIN ROME FIUMICINO DUESSELDORF LONDON/GATWICK LISBOA WIEN SCHWECHAT VENEZIA TESSERA NICE TEGEL-BERLIN COPENHAGEN KASTRUP HAMBURG FRANKFURT MAIN MUENCHEN 2 GENEVE COINTRIN OTOPENI-INTL. STUTTGART TOULOUSE BLAGNAC GOTEBORG/LANDVETTER WARSZAWA/OKECIE HANER FERIHEGY-BUDAPEST MILANO LINATE MILANO MALPENSA KOELN-BONN OSLO/GARDERMOEN BRUSSELS NATIONAL BARCELONA MADRID BARAJAS 8. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ISSUES 8.1. PLANNED EVENTS Bratislava ACC successfully moved to the new ops room on 19 February as planned. The plan was also to be back to normal operations by 27 February, but this was achieved earlier. Chisinau ACC continued training for the new ATM systems to be implemented later in 213; low impact on network performance and no reduction of sector capacities. Continuation of the transition (period 1) of former Munich upper sectors to Karlsruhe ACC (familiarisation of ATCOs to the new system and new airspace structure); planned medium impact on network performance; sector capacities reduced by approximately 25%, successively adapted on a day to day basis. Vienna ACC successfully moved to the new system COOPANS on 28 February as planned, with 5 capacity reduction on the first days (as planned). 8.2. DISRUPTIONS 1/2/213 Continuation of industrial action by French public services, impacted reported in January network operations report. 11/2/213 Zagreb ACC - 163-1653UTC - radar failure causing reduced capacities until 16:57UTC. No network impact. 25/2/213 Karlsruhe ACC - 94-1148UTC - 5 capacity reduction due to FDPS failure. Regulations applied in Langen and Munich ACCs as protection with medium network impact. DNM Network Operations Report Analysis February 213 13
8.3. OTHER CONSTRAINTS There were no other constraints with network impact in February 213. 9. NM ADDED VALUE 9.1 RRP DIRECT DELAY SAVINGS Average daily executed rerouting proposals In February 213, NM proposed alternative routes to an average of 5 flights per day of which 3 were accepted. This saved 69 minutes of daily delay at a cost of 2nm extra mileage flown. This graph shows the actual daily averages for the previous 13 months period. Nr of executed RRPs 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 6 4 2-2 -4-6 -8-1 -12 Minutes / NM Nr of RRPs Delay Reduction (min) Route Extention (NM ) 9.2 FLIGHTS WITH DELAY > 3 Average daily flights > 3 minutes delay 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 217 125 35 22 311 422 219 225 252 186 19 17 122 The number of flights that had more than 3 mins of ATFM delay decreased by 43.8% from 217 flights/day in February 212 to 122 flights/day in February 213. 79.5% of the delay was at airports. AIRPORT/TMA DNM Network Operations Report Analysis - February 213 14