Historical Review of Financial Performance of Water Supply Facilities of PDAM Makassar City

Similar documents
Balance sheets and additional ratios

THIRD QUARTER RESULTS 2018

1Q 2014 Edition. Share Information. Daily Share Price Movements

Volaris Reports Strong First Quarter 2015: 32% Adjusted EBITDAR Margin, 9% Operating Margin

AEROFLOT ANNOUNCES FY 2017 IFRS FINANCIAL RESULTS

Q Earnings Financial Results for the Third Quarter Ended December 31, January 29, 2015 OMRON Corporation

Interim Report 6m 2014

International Research Journal of Management Science & Technology ISSN (0nline) (Print) A REFEREED JOURNAL OF

Ref. PE004/ May Subject: Management Discussion and Analysis for the First Quarter of 2018

Investor Update September 2017 PARTNER OF CHOICE EMPLOYER OF CHOICE INVESTMENT OF CHOICE

Summary of Results for the First Quarter of FY2015/3

FIRST QUARTER RESULTS 2017

Copa Holdings Reports Net Income of $57.7 million and EPS of $1.36 for the Third Quarter of 2018

3M 2013 Edition. Share Information : GIAA.IJ / GIAA.JK. Daily Share Price Movements

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS. Subsequent Events

PRESS RELEASE Financial Results. Rising passenger traffic at 12.5m Exceeding 1bn in consolidated revenue

FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS 2017

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS. Subsequent Events

THIRD QUARTER RESULTS 2017

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

MIRAMAR, Fla., April 29, 2015 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Spirit Airlines, Inc. (Nasdaq:SAVE) today reported first quarter 2015 financial results.

Copa Holdings Reports Net Income of $49.9 million and EPS of $1.18 for the Second Quarter of 2018

Summary of Results for the First Three Quarters FY2015/3

Fact Sheet for Q3 and January-September 2017 October 20, 2017

Air Transportation OVERWEIGHT (Maintain)

Thank you for participating in the financial results for fiscal 2014.

INVESTOR NEWSLETTER. Full Year 2013 Editions. PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. FY 2012 FY 2013 Change. Summary.

THIRD QUARTER AND NINE MONTHS OF 2014 KEY RESULTS

Management s Review and Analysis of Financial Position

Earnings Report 1 st Quarter 2016 Grupo Viva Aerobus

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Results 3 rd Quarter 2003

Spirit Airlines Reports First Quarter 2017 Results

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Fact Sheet for Q4 and Full Year 2017 pre IFRS 15 and 9 adjustments February 1, 2018

Analyst and Investor Conference Call Q Ulrik Svensson, CFO and Member of the Executive Board

Second Quarter to 30th September

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2006 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

El Al Israel Airlines announced today its financial results for the second quarter and the first half of 2017.

Copa Holdings Reports Net Income of $136.5 million and EPS of $3.22 for the First Quarter of 2018

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS. Subsequent Events

Grupo Viva Aerobus announces results for the third quarter of 2016

Interim Report 3m Bilfinger Berger SE, Mannheim May 10, 2012 Joachim Müller, CFO

Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce & Industry TCCI BAROMETER. Palmos Analysis Ltd.

Results Presentation 27 May 2008

Presentation on Results for the 3rd Quarter FY Idemitsu Kosan Co.,Ltd. February 14, 2019

Spirit Airlines Reports Highest Second Quarter Pre-Tax Margin in Company History

JAPAN AIRLINES Co., Ltd. Financial Results 1 st Quarter Mar/2017(FY2016) July 29, 2016

Summary o f Results for the First Half of FY2018

Fact Sheet for Q4 and Full Year 2016 February 2, 2017

Fact Sheet for Q and H July 21, 2016

RYANAIR ANNOUNCES RECORD Q1 PROFIT INCREASE

Adjusted net income of $115 million versus an adjusted net loss of $7 million in the second quarter of 2012, an improvement of $122 million

FIRST QUARTER RESULTS 2016

Interim results. 11 May 2010

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Results 1 st Quarter 2005

First-half result 2015 MCH Group

Preliminary Figures FY 2016

Output volume and order backlog at record levels Renewed significant increases in net profit and operating profit Dividend bonus announced

SKYWEST, INC. ANNOUNCES THIRD QUARTER 2014 RESULTS

Air China Limited Interim Results. August Under IFRS

Ryannair Holdings plc. Sample 8

Spirit Airlines Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results

Investor Presentation

Spirit Airlines Reports Third Quarter 2015 Pre-Tax Margin of 26.9 Percent

Q Earnings Financial Results for the Third Quarter Ended December 31, January 28, 2016 OMRON Corporation

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT FIRST QUARTER 2004 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

JAPAN AIRLINES Co., Ltd. Financial Results 1 st Quarter Mar/2017(FY2016) July 29, 2016

PETROSEA RESULTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 30 SEPTEMBER 2017

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

CROWN ANNOUNCES 2017 FULL YEAR RESULTS

Icelandair Group Financial Results for the first half and Q2 2007

Financial Results 1 st Quarter Mar/2016 (FY2015) 30 July, 2015

Presentation on Results for the 2nd Quarter FY Idemitsu Kosan Co.,Ltd. November 14, 2018

WestJet announces 18th consecutive quarter of profitability Airline reports third quarter net earnings of $31.4 million

Volaris Reports First Quarter 2018 Results: Ancillary Revenue Expansion, Unit Cost Reduction and Cash Flow Generation

Investor update presentation. November 2016

1Q 2017 Earnings Call. April 18, 2017

Flughafen Wien Group Maintains Upward Trend: Passenger Growth and Strong Earnings Improvement in the First Nine Months of 2016

Flughafen Wien AG results in Q1 2015: Increased revenue and earnings despite passenger decline

CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications

CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications

AIR CANADA REPORTS 2010 THIRD QUARTER RESULTS; Operating Income improved $259 million or 381 per cent from previous year s quarter

ANA HOLDINGS Financial Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

JAPAN AIRLINES Co., Ltd. Financial Results 1 st Quarter Mar/2018(FY2017)

1.3% millionn euros. Net debt of 5.4 improvement. euros to. Financial Year. the Air. operating. equipped. ness and. also focus on.

Q Earnings Financial Results for the First Quarter Ended June 30, July 28, 2016 OMRON Corporation

CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications

GIAA In Flash YTD September 2015

Third Quarter Results

Highlights from the Annual Results December 2007

El Al Israel Airlines announced today its financial results for the year 2016 and the fourth quarter of the year:

Link btwn Oper & Finance

JAPAN AIRLINES Co., Ltd. Financial Results 1 st Quarter Mar/2018(FY2017)

Execution of WIN2016 programme currently underway, confirmation of underlying operating margin target of 5-6% for 2015/2016

I ll give you an overview of financial results for the first half of fiscal year 2017 and topics of each business, mainly Shopping Complex Business.

INVESTOR PRESENTATION. Imperial Capital Global Opportunities Conference September 2015

Year ended December 31, 2012

Transcription:

THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND SOCIAL CAPITAL Makassar, Indonesia, July 16-17, 2012 Historical Review of Financial Performance of Water Supply Facilities of PDAM Makassar City Nurdjannah HAMID 1 M. Asad ABDURAHMAN 2 Tri HARIANTO 3 Suharman HAMZAH 4 1 Associate Professor, Dept. of Management, Hasanuddin University E-mail:samang_l@yahoo.com 2 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hasanuddin University E-mail: asadmuh@gmail.com 3 Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hasanuddin University E-mail:triharianto@ymail.com 4 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hasanuddin University E-mail:suharmanhamzah@gmail.com Water availability is a human s basic needs to survive. the municipality has the authority and responsibility regarding PDAM management. The main duty of PDAM is to manage piped drinking water for city residence and industrial needs. However, reports show that so far, PDAM performance is in critical mainly in financial matters. The matters particularly in operational cost and efficiency which brings impact to the service level where PDAM unable to provide maximum service. Therefore, currently PDAM mainly focus to serve urban area. This paper explain financial performance (historical review) of PDAM in detail that focus on PDAM of Makassar as the case study. Based on the ratio obtained by Makassar PDAM in 2003-2006, it can be said that the contribution of obligations to form the total assets is large enough. However, such fact also shows that Makassar PDAM had ability to pay its long-term liabilities by using its assets was tend to decrease, which means that such situation was very risky for the continual existence of Makassar PDAM. Key Words : financial performance, PDAM Makassar City, water supply, 1. INTRODUCTION Water availability is a human s basic needs to survive. Therefore, according to Indonesian Constitution 1945 Section 33 Article (2), (3), and (4), the natural resources including water should be managed by the state and optimally used for the prosperity of 148

people. In line with it, Drinking Water Management Institution under the management of Department of Public Works has a duty to provide drinking water. Such institution known as PDAM which is a government owned enterprise for water supply and distribution. Thus, the municipality has the authority and responsibility regarding PDAM management. The main duty of PDAM is to manage piped drinking water for city residence and industrial needs. However, reports show that so far, PDAM performance is in critical mainly in financial matters. The matters particularly in operational cost and efficiency which brings impact to the service level where PDAM unable to provide maximum service. Therefore, currently PDAM mainly focus to serve urban area. This paper will explain financial performance (historical review) of PDAM in detail that focus on PDAM of Makassar as the case study. Figure 1 shows that the ability of Makassar PDAM to cover its short-term debt had decreasing trend between 2003 to 2005 and then increased in 2006. In the average, Makassar PDAM s ratio is 40.2% which is below the ideal ratio (10). It expresses that the capability of Makassar PDAM to utilize its current assets to pay off its short-term debts obligations is only 40.2%. In other word, every rupiah of debt obligation is only covered with 0.42 of current assets. The decreasing trend was driven by the decline of company s circulating assets (cash and cash equivalent, short-term deposit, trade receivable and merchandise inventory). Meanwhile, company s short-term debt obligations increased. The long term impact of this situation is that Makassar PDAM will unable to pay off its short-term debt obligations if only rely on its current assets. (2) Cash to Current Liabilities ratio Instead of utilizing its currents assets, cash to current liabilities ratio can be utilized to determine Makassar PDAM to pay its short-term liabilities using possessed cash. Generally, the higher the value of the ratio, the larger the margin of safety that the company owns to cover short-term debts. The expected ratio value is more than 10 2. LIQUIDITY RATIO The ratio expresses ability of Makassar PDAM to pay off its short-term debts obligations. Generally, the higher the value of the ratio, the larger the margin of safety that the company possesses to cover short-term debts. (1) Current ratio Current ratio shows contribution of current assets to cover current liabilities. The higher value of the ratio, the higher capability of Makassar PDAM to repay its short-term liabilities out, where the expected ratio value 1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Current Ratio Fig.1 Current ratio. 12. 10. 8. 6. 4. 2. Cash Ratio 0. Fig.2 Cash ratio. Figure 2 shows that Makassar PDAM s capability to cover its short-term debts had decreasing trend between 2003-2005 and increased in 2006. The average cash ratio of 5.9% is far below the ideal ratio value. It expresses that every rupiah of debt obligation is only covered with 0.059 rupiah of possessed cash. (3) Total Assets to Total Debt In particular situation, Makassar PDAM may utilize total assets to pay off its debt obligations. Total Assets to Total Debt ratio is a tool to measure the capability of Makassar PDAM to use its total assets cover its total debt. The higher value of the ratio, the higher capability of Makassar PDAM to repay its total liabilities out. The expected ratio value is more than 1. 149

Total Assets to Total Debt 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Fig.3 Total Assets to Total Debt ratio. 3. OPERATING RATIO (1) Operating ratio This ratio is used to determine the amount of costs incurred during Makassar PDAM creating revenue. The smaller value of the ratio is better for the company or in other words that the expected ratio is smaller than 1. This ratio can also be used to measure the efficiency level of Makassar PDAM Financial performance of Makassar PDAM that is measured using Total Assets to Total Debt ratio shows the decreasing trend between 2003 to 2006. This was a critical condition facing Makassar PDAM which brought the company into unsafe situation. Since even though the company utilize the entire assets, it would unable to pay off its total liabilities to its clients, investors, creditors, costumers, and government. These obligations determine the operability of Makassar PDAM in the future. (4) Equity to Total Debt ratio Companies that earn profits in their operation are able use its equity to pay their liabilities off. In every company s equity there are accumulated profits which earned in previous periods. However, Makassar PDAM Makassar from 2003 to 2006 were unable to utilize its equity to meet its obligations both short-term liabilities and long-term obligations, because since 2003, Makassar PDAM in its operation failed to create profit. The ratio of total equity to total debt ratio of Makassar PDAM is shown in figure 4. 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 Total Equity to Total Debt 0.0-10.0 Fig.4 Total Equity to Total Debt ratio. Based on an analysis to Makassar PDAM s ability to meet its obligations in both the short-term liabilities and long-term obligations with current assets (current ratio, cash to current liabilities), total assets (total assets to total debt) and equity (equity to total debt) shows performance that tends to decrease, which means that current assets, total assets and equity can not be used to pay off the obligations of the company. 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 Operating Ratio 0.00 Fig.5 Operating ratio. Figure 5 shows operating ratio of Makassar PDAM from 2003 to 2006 that was in fluctuating movement. This expresses that efficiency level of Makassar PDAM also fluctuated. In 2003, in order to created 1 rupiah of revenue, Makassar PDAM required operating cost of 0.67 rupiah. Reaching the summit at 2004 and then declined afterward. Decrease in this ratio due to increased revenue Makassar PDAM with a larger proportion than the increase in operating costs. (2) Operating Revenue to Long-term Liabilities Ratio This ratio is used to measure the contribution of long-term debt in creating revenue for Makassar PDAM. If the existence of long-term debt is to finance the investment, it can be said that this ratio can also be used to determine the contribution of investment in creating revenue. The greater value this ratio indicates better performance (the ratio 1). 10 8 6 4 2 Operating Revenue to Long-term liabilities Ratio Fig.6 Operating Revenue to Long Term Liabilities ratio. Although the value of operating revenue to 150

long-term liabilities ratio obtained Makassar PDAM in the period of 2003-2006 was likely to show a good value, but it was only caused by changes in each indicator that are not similar to other indicator. Those indicators in this case are operating revenue and long-term liabilities. It can be seen that changes in each value of operating revenue and long-term liabilities. For example, in 2004, Makassar PDAM revenues decreased by 7% while the debt decreased (payable to the creditor) only by 2%. Whereas, in 2005, revenue decreased only by 1% while debt decreased by 1. Similarly, in 2006 there was an increase earnings by 52% while debt decreased by 5%. The other side of the fluctuations in the debt reduction in 2003-2006 indicates that the payment of long-term debt of Makassar PDAM is also likely to fluctuate. 4. SOLVABILITIES This ratio is utilized to describe the Makassar PDAM ability to pay its long-term liabilities. (1) Total Debt to Total Assets ratio This ratio indicates the ability of Makassar PDAM in resolving the long-term liabilities to creditors or investors with total assets/property owned. The smaller this ratio indicates a good performance. PDAM considering that the capital accumulation which was derived from operation of the company were unable to make a major contribution, since in the period of 2003 2006, Makassar PDAM experienced loss while both of municipality and the central government never increase their investment in Makassar PDAM. 200 Total Debt to Equity Ratio -200-400 -600-800 -1000-1200 5. PROFITABILITY Fig.8 Total Debt to Equity ratio. Profitability ratios or so-called rentability ratio describes the ability of Makassar PDAM to create profit which is derived from its assets and capital. (1) Return on Investment This ratio describes the ability of Makassar PDAM in gaining profits through owned assets. ROI 12 10 8 6 4 Total Debt to Total Equity -5% -1-15% 2-2 Fig.7 Total Debt to Total Equity ratio. Based on the ratio obtained by Makassar PDAM in 2003-2006, it can be said that the contribution of obligations to form the total assets is large enough. However, such fact also shows that Makassar PDAM had ability to pay its long-term liabilities by using its assets was tend to decrease, which means that such situation was very risky for the continual existence of Makassar PDAM. (2) Total Debt to Equity ratio Apart from using corporate property, Makassar PDAM can also take advantage of possessed capital. But this hope was not fully carried out by Makassar Fig.9 Retrun on Investment. Losses suffered by Makassar PDAM had direct impact to the Return On Investment ratio of 2003 to 2005 with the lowest point in 2005, amounting to -18% and then increased to -4% in 2006. This means that the asset management of Makassar PDAM in 2003-2006 had not been able to create profits or sales. (2) Return On Equity Profits earned by Makassar PDAM not only can be obtained through asset management, but also can be gained through the capital owned. As described earlier (Total Debt to Total Equity and Return On Investment ratio), the impact of Makassar PDAM loss in the period 2003 to 2006 led to ROE values of 151

Makassar PDAM became negative 6. SUMMARY -5% -1-15% -2 ROE Y e a r Fig.10 Return on Equity. (3) Total Asset turn Over ratio This ratio indicates how much the contribution of assets to create sales. In the period 2003-2006, Makassar PDAM capability tend to increase in creating sales which was derived from utilization of owned assets. Total Asset turn Over The ability of Makassar PDAM to cover its short-term debt had decreasing trend and then increased in period of 2006. In the average, Makassar PDAM s ratio is 40.2% which is below the ideal ratio (10) and the average cash ratio of 5.9% is far below the ideal ratio value. Operating ratio of Makassar PDAM was in fluctuating movement. This expresses that efficiency level of Makassar PDAM also fluctuated. The other side of the fluctuations in the debt reduction indicates that the payment of long-term debt of Makassar PDAM is also likely to fluctuate. Based on the ratio obtained by Makassar PDAM in 2003-2006, it can be said that the contribution of obligations to form the total assets is large enough. However, such fact also shows that Makassar PDAM had ability to pay its long-term liabilities by using its assets was tend to decrease, which means that such situation was very risky for the continual existence of Makassar PDAM. 5 4 3 2 1 Y e a r Fig.11 Total Asset turn Over. However in its operation, sales which generated during that period were unable to produce the maximum benefit due to the fluctuation of operating costs (see operating ratio). Decrease or increase in operating costs attributable to changes in water source cost and raw water treatment costs which are influenced by the raw materials price or components price and other expenses such as electricity costs. REFERENCES 1) Anonymous,Balance sheet PDAM Makassar City year 2003-2006 2) Miles, J. W. : On the generation of surface waves by shear flows, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 3, Pt. 2, pp. 185-204, 1957. 3) Miche, M. : Amortissement des houles dans le do-maine de l eau peu profonde, La Houile Blanche, No. 5, pp. 726-745, 1956. 4) Gresho, P. M., Chan, S. T., Lee, R. L. and Upson, C. D. : A modified finite element method for solving the timedependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, part 1, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, Vol. 4, pp. 557-598, 1984. 5) Shepard, F. P. and Inman, D. L. : Nearshore water circulation related to bottom topogrphy and wave refraction, Trans. AGU., Vol. 31, No. 2, 1950. 6) Smith, W. : Cellular phone positioning and travel times estimates, Proc. of 8th ITS World Congress, CD-ROM, 2000. 152