Performance Planning Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM Financial and Performance Committee, 23 May 2014

Similar documents
Performance Planning Operations: Environment. Bernhard Mayr, CM TF Performance, MoT Germany 20 May 2011

Efficiency and Environment KPAs

ATC Global 2014 航空运输业的可持续发展. The Sustainable Development of the Air Transport Industry. Robin Deransy

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

PERFORMANCE REPORT ENVIRONMENT

European Performance Scheme

ANNEX ANNEX. to the. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU).../...

Linking airports with European ATM

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

IATA EUR Airline PBN implementation requirements - March State Airport TMA/Runways Specifics. Austria VIE PRNAV SIDs/STARs

Follow up to the implementation of safety and air navigation regional priorities XMAN: A CONCEPT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF ATFCM CROSS-BORDER EXCHANGES

Performance Indicator Horizontal Flight Efficiency

InterFAB Cooperation: XMAN Implementing Extended Cross-Border Arrival Management. World ATM Congress Madrid, 8 March 2016

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

Single European Sky Benefits for the airline industry. Warsaw, 28 November 2011

PERFORMANCE REPORT CAPACITY

SES Performance Scheme

Airports Council International, Geneva, Switzerland Airports Council International, European Region, Brussels

2010 US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

EUROCONTROL General Presentation

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

ATFM delay report July Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

AIRPORT POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY. April 2016 Workshop «air pollution and airports»

ATFM delay report January Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

Air Traffic Flow Management Delay (ATFM) ATFM measures in Europe (Data Source: CFMU statistics)

ATFM delay report April 2018

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, FAA. Hartmut Koelman Senior Expert, Performance review Unit, EUROCONTROL

ATFM delay report February Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report August Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

SWISS Proposals SJU Large Scale Demonstration Timeline Eric Nantier, Operations Research and ATM, May 2014

Airport Noise Management: Benchmarking of 12 International Airports

ATFM delay report October Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report December Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ATFM delay report November Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM) delay ATFM measures in Europe (Data source: NM statistics)

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED OPERATIONAL MEASURES. Guido Kerkhofs Director ATM Programmes EUROCONTROL

FBO Network Germany. FBO Düsseldorf Terminal & Infrastructure Charges

Network Management, building on our experience of flow management and network planning.

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

Operational Performance Workgroup. John Gulding Manager, Strategic Analysis and Benchmarking, ATO Office of Performance Analysis, FAA

Press release. For immediate release 10 September European airport passenger traffic up 8.3% in July

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

IFR flights in the Federal Republic of Germany

Flight Efficiency Initiative

LIZ Air traffic statistics

LIZ Air traffic statistics

LIZ Air traffic statistics

LIZ Air traffic statistics

LIZ Air traffic statistics

LIZ Air traffic statistics

Network Operations Performance

Aviation fuelling at its best

LIZ Air traffic statistics

ATM in Europe It s all about Performance

MEASUREMENT OF THE QUALITY OF TRAFFIC ORIENTATION SCHEMES REGARDING FLIGHT PLAN EFFICIENCY

8 th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar. US/Europe comparison of ATM-related operational performance. June 30, 2009 Napa Valley, California

NO FLIGHT EFFICIENCY USER MANUAL. Network Manager

and the Environment Speaker: Guy Viselé External Communication Advisor ABC User Committee, February 2 nd 2009

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

IFATCA. Survey Report. When are they used?

Performance fabec air navigation service providers

Cooperative traffic management

BUSINESS AVIATION TRAFFIC TRACKER EUROPE. September 2018

ICAO EUR Region Performance Framework

NETWORK OPERATIONS - FLIGHT EFFICIENCY USER MANUAL. Network Manager

PROCESS FOR DEVELOPING RP2 IN RESPECT OF THE UK Workshop

Intra-European Seat Capacity. January February March April May June July August September October November December. Intra-European Sectors Flown

BUSINESS AVIATION TRAFFIC TRACKER EUROPE. January 2018

Civil and Military Use of Airspace in France

BUSINESS AVIATION TRAFFIC TRACKER EUROPE. April 2017

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

Directorate Network Management Monthly Network Operations Report Analysis - March 2012

ENABLING GREENER FLIGHT TRAJECTORIES. David Bowen Chief of ATM SESAR JU

The SESAR contribution to the near and mid term Safety

The Network Manager User Forum 2017

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

Modernising UK Airspace 2025 Vision for Airspace Tools and Procedures. Controller Pilot Symposium 24 October 2018

NETWORK OPERATIONS REPORT Main Report - Draft for Consultation Draft for Consultation

Traffic at smaller airports up 11% in November

EUROCONTROL Low-Cost Carrier Market Update

ICAO EUR Region Performance Framework. (ICAO EUR Doc 030)

Airports Council International, Geneva, Switzerland Airports Council International, European Region, Brussels

Analysis of vertical flight efficiency during climb and descent

EUROCONTROL. Visit of the Transport Attachés. 10 April Frank Brenner. Director General EUROCONTROL

The SES Performance Scheme. ICAO Regional Performance Framework Workshop Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan May 2013

Airports Council International, Geneva, Switzerland Airports Council International, European Region, Brussels

Design Airspace (Routes, Approaches and Holds) Module 11 Activity 7. European Airspace Concept Workshops for PBN Implementation

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Michael Hoehenberger, (Munich Airport) on behalf of ACI World

Brussels Airport Airline Issues & Route Development Breakout session 18 June

Network Manager Adding value to the Network 29 September 2011

Transcription:

Performance Planning Environment Bernhard Mayr, CM Financial and Performance Committee, 23 May 2014 0

Agenda Report Performance Environment RP 1 Environment KPI #1 RP 2 FABEC Target RP 2 FABEC Airspace projects RP 2 1

RP1 - Environment: Overview EU-wide KPI Average horizontal en-route flight efficiency (EC 691/2010) FABEC KPI/PI KPI # 1: % of route extension represented in distance flown compared to great circle distance KPI # 2: Approach procedures in place supporting CDO operations (ICAO Doc 9931) PI # 1: % of route extension of intra FABEC flights represented by last filed flight plan compared to great circle distance

Environment RP1 - EU-wide level Route extension For RP 1, the EU-wide environment target is set by using the percentage of direct route extension represented in distance flown compared to great circle distance : a) all commercial IFR flights within European airspace b) where a flight departs or arrives outside the European airspace only that part inside the European airspace is considered c) En-route is defined as the distance flown outside a circle of 40 NM around the airport d) circular flights and flights with a great circle distance shorter than 80 NM between terminal areas are excluded e) PRB uses the last filed flight plan vs great circle distance! f) No mandatory national/fab environment KPI for RP1

Environment RP1 - EU-wide level Route extension EU Target: Improvement by 0.75 of a percentage point of the average horizontal en route flight efficiency indicator in 2014 as compared to the situation in 2009

Environment RP1 EU wide level Route extension - Evolution

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 1 Route extension actual tracks Percentage of route extension represented in distance flown compared to the great circle distance : a) based on difference between the length of the en route part of the actual trajectory and the great circle distance b) based on radar data c) actual tracks flown are considered d) tactical improvements included e) mitigates some insufficient flight planning f) indicator can not fully be managed by FABEC ANSP g) reflects the current FABEC operational performance h) better picture on environmental and operational benefits

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 1 Route extension actual tracks FABEC Target: Improvement by 5% of the average horizontal en route flight efficiency extension in 2014 as compared to the situation in 2011

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 1 Route extension actual tracks 2011 Value: 1,95 % 2014 Target: 1,86 %

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 2 CDO For RP 1, a FABEC target has been set by using the share of FABEC airports that offer approach procedures in place supporting Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) in accordance with ICAO Doc. 9931: a) share of relevant FABEC airports that offer Continuous Descent Operations b) to support the reduction of aircraft noise, fuel burn and emissions c) priority requirement of SESAR Master plan d) airports in FABEC region with more then 50.000 commercial movements e) airports CDO/CDA implementation status with EUROCONTROL tool f) taking into account interdependencies with capacity and safety

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 2 CDO April 2011 FABEC airports > 50.000 STATFOR movements in 2010 No COUNTRY ICAO code IATA_CODE NAME Total Traffic CDA_IMPL_STATUS_ID 1 BELGIUM EBBR BRU BRUSSELS NATIONAL 218836 Trial 2 GERMANY EDDB SXF BERLIN/SCHOENEFELD 72467 not planned yet 3 GERMANY EDDF FRA FRANKFURT MAIN 464313 Established 4 GERMANY EDDH HAM HAMBURG/FUHLSBUETTEL 148790 Committed (planned for 2011) 5 GERMANY EDDK CGN KOELN-BONN 130997 Established 6 GERMANY EDDL DUS DUESSELDORF 215069 not planned yet 7 GERMANY EDDM MUC MUENCHEN 386911 Established 8 GERMANY EDDN NUE NUERNBERG 60747 not planned yet 9 GERMANY EDDP LEJ LEIPZIG/HALLE 61160 Established 10 GERMANY EDDS STR STUTTGART 123300 not planned yet 11 GERMANY EDDV HAJ HANNOVER LANGENHAGEN 67068 Established 12 NETHERLANDS EHAM AMS AMSTERDAM/SCHIPHOL 396797 Established 13 LUXEMBOURG ELLX LUX LUXEMBURG 53716 Committed 14 FRANCE LFBD BOD BORDEAUX-MERIGNAC 53384 Committed 15 FRANCE LFBO TLS TOULOUSE BLAGNAC 88238 Trial 16 FRANCE LFLL LYS LYON SAIT EXUPERY 119672 Trial 17 FRANCE LFML MRS MARSEILLE PROVENCE 103284 Established 18 FRANCE LFMN NCE NICE COTE D'AZUR 129868 Committed 19 FRANCE LFPG CDG PARIS CHARLES DE GAULLE 499866 Trial 20 FRANCE LFPO ORY PARIS ORLY 219755 Established 21 FRANCE LFSB BSL BALE-MULHOUSE 63706 Committed 22 SWITZERLAND LSGG GVA GENEVE COINTRIN 164597 Established 23 SWITZERLAND LSZH ZRH ZURICH 256811 Established (minus "Paris/Le Bourget (operational interdependencies with Orly and CDG); minus Berlin Tegel ( airport is closed soon) 2011 April No CDO Committed Trial Established Total CDO Established Share % 4 5 4 10 23 43

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 2 CDO April 2011 2011 April No CDO Committed Trial Established Total CDO Established Share % 4 5 4 10 23 43 Target 2014 Established Total Target Share % 21 23 90 FABEC Target: 90% e.i. 21 of the 23 relevant FABEC airports to offer approach procedures in place supporting Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) in accordance with ICAO Doc. 9931 at the end of 2014

Environment RP1 - FABEC level KPI # 2 CDO March 2014 2014 March No CDO during RP1 Planned for RP1 Established Total CDO Established Share % 1 8 14 23 61

Environment RP1 - FABEC level PI # 1 Direct route extension intra FABEC For RP 1, a FABEC indicator monitors the percentage of route extension of intra FABEC flights (take-off and landing in FABEC AoR) represented by the last filed flight plan compared to great circle distance: a) Intra-FABEC flights could be considered as a field for improvement b) Relatively weak performance data required attention c) Most 50 penalised city pairs already undergoing a optimisation process (e.g. Paris Munich)

Environment RP1 - FABEC level PI # 1 Direct route extension intra FABEC Historical data from September 2009 to December 2010 Last Flight Plan trajectory inside FABEC Flights Direct distance (km) FPL distance (km) Extradistance per flight Efficiency indicator Overflight 1 465 584 1 051 423 305 1 083 753 234 22,06 3,1 % Dep or Arr 3 886 752 1 819 788 658 1 909 590 982 23,10 4,9 % Dep & Arr 1 622 703 610 170 133 654 440 801 27,28 7,3 % TOTAL 6 975 039 3 481 382 096 3 647 785 017 23,86 4,78%

Environment RP1 - FABEC level PI # 1 Direct route extension intra FABEC

Environment: Incentives no financial incentives for RP1 Finance and Performance Committee entitled to trigger the ANSPs process to identify, as appropriate, corrective actions up to specific ANSPs and/or at FABEC level.

Agenda Report Performance Environment RP 1 Environment KPI #1 RP 2 FABEC Target RP 2 FABEC Airspace projects RP 2 17

RP2 Environment KPI Overview KPA ENVIRONMENT EU FAB KEA = The average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory KEP = The average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the last filed flight plan trajectory, KEA KPI KEP KPI KEA KPI

Environment RP2 - EU-wide level KEA - KPI = horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, defined as follows : a) the indicator is the comparison between the length of the en route part of the actual trajectory derived from surveillance data and the corresponding portion of the great circle distance, summed over all IFR flights within or traversing the European airspace; b) en route refers to the distance flown outside a circle of 40 NM around the airports; c) where a flight departs from or arrives at a place outside the European airspace, only the part inside European airspace is considered.

Environment RP2 - EU-wide level KEP - KPI = Average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the last filed flight plan trajectory, defined as follows : a) difference between length of en route part of the last filed flight plan trajectory and the corresponding portion of the great circle distance, summed over all IFR flights within or traversing the European airspace; b) en route refers to the distance flown outside a circle of 40 NM around the airports; c) where a flight departs from or arrives at a place outside the European airspace, only the part inside European airspace is considered.

Environment RP2 FAB level KEA - KPI The average horizontal en route flight efficiency of the actual trajectory, defined as follows: a) the indicator is the comparison between the length of the en route part of the actual trajectory derived from surveillance data and the achieved distance, summed over all IFR flights within or traversing the local airspace; b) en route refers to the distance flown outside a circle of 40NM around the airports; c) where a flight departs from or arrives at a place outside the local airspace, only the part inside the local airspace is considered; d) achieved distance is a function of the position of the entry and exit points of the flight into and out of the local airspace. Achieved distance represents the contribution that these points make to the distance used in the Union- wide indicator. The sum of these distances over all traversed local airspaces equals the distance used in the Union-wide indicator. For the purpose of this indicator, local means at FAB level.

Environment RP2 Achieved distance* Achieved distances for a flight add up to great circle distance The achieved distance for the en-route portion of a flight corresponds to the achieved distance between entry and exit points located on the 40NM circles (for a flight within SES) *For a more extended description see: http://www.eurocontrol.int/prudata/dashboard/eur_view_2013.html

Environment RP2 - EU-wide level KEP & KEA - evolutions Comparison of annual values shows an improvement for the filed flight plan (KEP) and the actual trajectory (KEA) between 2009 and 2013.

Environment RP2 - EU-wide level KEP & KEA - targets EU-wide KEP & KEA targets for RP2: For RP2, the Union-wide performance targets for the key performance area of environment are as follows: 1. an average horizontal en route flight efficiency of at least 2,6 % in 2019 for the actual trajectory (KEA); 2. an average horizontal en route flight efficiency of at least 4,1 % in 2019 for the last filed flight plan trajectory (KEP).

Agenda Report Performance Environment RP 1 Environment KPI #1 RP 2 FABEC Target RP 2 FABEC Airspace projects RP 2 25

Environment RP2 - FABEC level KEA - target FABEC KEA target for RP2: For RP2, the FABEC performance target for the key performance area of environment

Environment RP2 - FABEC level KEA - target 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 EU wide target FABEC reference value FABEC target proposal (2019) - - - - 2.60 % 3.30 % 3.22 % 3.14 % 3.05 % 2.96 % 3.30 % 3.22 % 3.14 % 3.05 % 2.96 % KEA 2012: 3,56% KEA 2013: 3,50% The reference values anticipate an improvement of more than 0.6 p.p. until 2019. This would be an improvement never seen before in the last decade in Europe and will be challenging to achieve in an airspace as dense and complex as FABEC.

Agenda Report Performance Environment RP 1 Environment KPI #1 RP 2 FABEC Target RP 2 FABEC Airspace projects RP 2 28

Environment RP2 - FABEC level Airspace projects RP 2 FABEC undertakes several cross-border projects to improve en-route flight efficiency to provide a mutual benefit for airspace users: 1. FABEC Project South-East Phase 1-3, 2. FABEC Project Free Route Airspace, 3. FABEC Project Cross-border Arrival Management, 4. FABEC Project CBA Land Central West Phase 1 and 2, 5. FABEC Project Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management / Air Space Management.

- END - 30