Bar-le-Duc, 12 th December 2011

Similar documents
Draft LAW. ON SOME AMENDAMENTS IN THE LAW No.9587, DATED ON THE PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY AS AMENDED. Draft 2. Version 1.

Life Chiro Med - Conservation and integrated management of two bat species in the French Mediterranean region. LIFE08 NAT/F/000473

We, Ministers, assembled in Berlin for the International Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism from 6 to 8 March 1997

628: BELOVEZHSKAYA PUSHCHA STATE NATIONAL PARK (BELARUS)

European Union Delegation in Albania Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Presence in Albania

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG XI.D.2. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds. and

ARTWEI ARTWEI ARTWEI

Submission on the Tukituki Catchment Proposal: EPA reference numbers; NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/ , NSP 13/02.

A GUIDE TO MANITOBA PROTECTED AREAS & LANDS PROTECTION

NCC SUBMISSION ON EXPLANATION OF INTENDED EFFECT: STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICY NO 44 KOALA HABITAT PROTECTION

REAUTHORISATION OF THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND AND CATHAY PACIFIC

Chapter 9: National Parks and Protected Areas

Case 3:18-cv FAB Document 1 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO CIVIL NO.

1. INTRODUCTION 2. OTAS AND THE MFN CLAUSE

Designated Sites. Headlines

What is an Marine Protected Area?


Public Submissions in response to the Bill closed on 2 July 2015 and Council lodged a copy of the submission provided as Attachment 1.

Silvia Giulietti ETIS Conference Brussels An EEA reporting mechanism on tourism and environment and ETIS

DATE: January 19, WCA Governing Board. Johnathan Perisho, Project Manager. Mark Stanley, Executive Officer

Mr Mick Gentleman Chair, Standing Committee on Planning and Environment Committee ACT Legislative Assembly Canberra ACT 2601

DIRECTIVE 2002/30/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

BABIA GÓRA DECLARATION ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN MOUNTAIN AREAS

INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSPORT IN NORTH-EAST ASIA

Forms of Natural Protection in Greece

Case No IV/M KUONI / FIRST CHOICE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/05/1999

Visitor Management Plan innovative and hospitable

PRIORITY HABITAT SURVEY 2017 SWALEDALE. Summary. July 2018

Hydropower development in Valbona VALLEY National Park IN Albania

The Commission states that there is a strong link between economic regulation and safety. 2

4) Data sources and reporting ) References at the international level... 5

REGIONAL AGREEMENT AND FRAMEWORK FOR MARINE MAMMALS CONSERVATION IN THE WCR: THE SPAW PROTOCOL AND THE MARINE MAMMAL ACTION PLAN

PERTH AND KINROSS COUNCIL

Akamas Peninsula (Cyprus)

Bedfordshire and Luton Species Action Plan: Hazel Dormouse

FILE: /PERM EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 2014 AMENDMENT:

Order of the Minister of Environment #39, August 22, 2011 Tbilisi

Belarus seminar on transboundary wetland sites

Invitation to participate in the ATOL Reporting Accountants scheme CAP 1288

ACI EUROPE POSITION. A level playing field for European airports the need for revised guidelines on State Aid

SUSTAINABLE AND ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TOURISM IN THE COASTAL ZONES OF THE BALTIC SEA AREA

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail Legislative History and Planning Guidance

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY

Questions inviting views and conclusions in respect of the three short-listed options

Establishment of Maquenque National Park to Achieve Connectivity within the San Juan-La Selva Biological Corridor

33. Coiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection (Panama) N 1138 rev)

The South Gippsland Koala. For over 60 years, the plantation industry has shared a unique relationship with the Strzelecki Koala. protection.

Koala and Greater Glider detection report, Ray s track coupes and , East Gippsland

Protection of Ulcinj Saline

Stephens Rd. Nature Preserve

FAA Draft Order CHG Designee Policy. Comments on the Draft Order published online for public comment

Restoration and management of Natura 2000 territories Grasslands and meadows in. Salantai Regional Park

European Aviation Safety Agency 1 Sep 2008 OPINION NO 03/2008. of 1 September 2008

January 14, Orange County Transportation Authority Attn: M2 NCCP/HCP 550 South Main Street P.O. Box Orange, CA

Audit brief. Passenger rights in the EU

Dr. Melissa Grigione And Kurt Menke. Jaguar -Arturo. Jaguarundi -Arturo. Ocelot -Arturo. Caso. Caso. Caso

Movement Strategy. November On behalf of Barton Oxford LLP

Alternative 3 Prohibit Road Construction, Reconstruction, and Timber Harvest Except for Stewardship Purposes B Within Inventoried Roadless Areas

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE TIME LIMIT SET IN ARTICLE 5 TO COMPLETE THE DESTRUCTION OF ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES. Summary. Submitted by Senegal

Abbey Chesterton bridge Questions & Answers

9820/1/14 REV 1 GL/kl 1 DGE 2 A

Safety Regulatory Oversight of Commercial Operations Conducted Offshore

AVIATION RULES OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC APKR-6 "OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT" Annex 6 Flight time limitations and flight duty time 01-Sep-2016

Numaykoos Lake Provincial Park. Management Plan

Case No COMP/M BOEING / CARMEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/06/2006

2.2 For these reasons the provision of tourist signing will only be considered:

FIELD TRIPS PROPOSAL

LIFE CANAL DE CASTILLA BULLETIN

Case No IV/M British Airways / TAT (II) REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/08/1996

Airdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1

Section 1 Introduction to Sustainable Tourism

IMPLEMENTATION OF MURA DRAVA REGIONAL PARK IN VIROVITICA- PODRAVINA COUNTY

2.0 PARK VISION AND ROLES

Official Journal of the European Union L 7/3

52. Richtersveld Cultural and Botanical Landscape (South Africa) (C 1265)

Terrestrial Protected Area Nomination: Hemmington Forest, Cayman Brac Central

Official Journal of the European Union L 337/43

TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF MARINE AND COASTAL HABITATS ASIA- PACIFIC DAY FOR THE OCEAN

A call for support against the plans of the Bulgarian Government to allow unsustainable ski projects in Bulgarian National Parks

October 31, OAK RIDGES MORAINE FOUNDATION 120 BAYVIEW PARKWAY, NEWMARKET, ON L3Y 3W

Overview of Protected Areas Management in Nepal. Hari Bhadra Acharya Under Secretary Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Nepal

ASLEF s Response to the East Anglia Rail Franchise Consultation

Perth and Kinross Council Development Management Committee 27 March 2013 Report of Handling by Development Quality Manager

Management of national park directorates in Hungary, land purchase

Future challenges in the air cargo transport

Decision Memo Broken Wheel Ranch Equestrian Outfitter Special-Use Permit Proposed Action

The Natura 2000 network and thread from mining activities 1

Pre-application submission for Committee: Phase 4 development at West Hendon

SUBMISSION BY. TO THE TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE COMMERCE AMENDMENT BILL

HARTWIG MEDICAL FOUNDATION - GUIDING PRINCIPLES 2017

SUBMISSION ON THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGE 139/05 TO SECTION 6.2 (RUNWAYS) OF THE PART 139 MANUAL OF STANDARDS AERODROMES

NATIONAL AIRSPACE POLICY OF NEW ZEALAND

Appendix 12. HS2/HS1 Connection. Prepared by Christopher Stokes

REVISION OF REG. 1371/2007 ON RAIL PASSENGERS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS: THE POSITION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATORS AND ORGANISING AUTHORITIES

Large Carnivore of the Ukrainian Carpathians

LIFE BEAR DEFRAGMENTATION - HABITAT DEFRAGMENTATION FOR BROWN BEAR IN THE CANTABRIAN MOUNTAINS LIFE12 NAT/ES/000192

Penzance Heliport Ltd.

The European Commission's Proposal to Amend EU Regulation 261/2004. by Arpad Szakal

Project : Marine Ecology Research Center (MERC) Sabah, Malaysia

St. Joe Travel Management EA CULTURAL RESOURCES

Transcription:

ANNEXE 1

ANNEXE 2

ANNEXE 3

Please note that this translation has been done by associative volunteers, and may therefore contain some inaccuracies from the original French. However, we still wanted to let you know in case it might help a faster consideration of our mail. Bar-le-Duc, 12 th December 2011 Object: Non consideration of the impact of the road connection project from Belval to the motorway A30, on Natura 2000 areas in Esch-sur-Alzette and Differdange, Luxembourg (LU0002008, LU0002009, LU0001028 and LU0001030). Presidents, With the present letter, the co-signing non-profit organizations from France and Luxembourg would like to express their worry about the road project Belval-A30 (under the contracting authority of the county Councils). This project could have a great detrimental impact on the neighbouring Natura 2000 areas and their natural diversity. At the present time, there has no clear assessment of these impacts. To our dismay we were informed during the meeting of the technical committee Alzette-Belval on the 24 th of November 2011 that no impact assessment would be carried out. In addition, both the lack of conclusive study about the obvious ecological alternative to this road project, ie the renovation of the railway from Fontoy to Audun-le-Tiche, as well as the uncertainty regarding imperative reasons for this project to be of major public interest, leave us perplexed. We estimate -and many naturalists from Lorraine and Luxembourg are in agreement- that this infrastructure will likely have a noticeable effect on the species present in the Natura 2000 areas named above during both building and operating stages. Following are a few detailed elements demonstrating this statement: - With regard to the existing supranational biological corridor: The Belval to A30 road connection project is located between 600 metres and 3 kilometres from Luxembourgish Natura 2000 areas, namely two SAC (Special Areas of Conservation - LU0001028 and LU0001030) and two SPA (Special Protection Areas - LU0002008 and LU0002009) (see Appendix 1). The areas directly affected by the project include similar habitats to those of nearby former mines in Esch-sur-Alzette and Differdange identified as Natura 2000 areas and, more significantly, feature a higher and more diverse number of plant and animal species. Individuals of species present on the Natura 2000 areas are highly likely to use the affected areas as part of their life cycle and therefore highly likely to be directly affected by the road project. This is an exceptionally strong concern because the natural area in question is an essential part of a supranational biological corridor connected to Natura 2000 areas in Luxembourg, including the ones in Differdange-Prenzebierg (and to a Tél. : 09 50 30 95 60 fax : 03 29 76 83 68 E-mail : mirabel-lne @ wanadoo.fr - web : http://mirabel.lne.free.fr 1/4

lesser extent the ones in Esch-sur-Alzette) (see Appendix 2). Due to the proximity and interconnection between the areas, exchanges of individuals between areas are inevitable and a key element towards species conservation through the colonization of new territories and the exchange of genetic material. The route of the road would go through the length of natural areas of Micheville. These areas include the same natural habitats and faunal and floral sets as the ones in Natura 2000 areas in close proximity. Building a road infrastructure across these natural areas and thus severing the existing and functional biological corridor would cause a major detrimental impact on species opportunity to travel and colonize other territories. - With regard to the cumulated impacts: The area directly affected by the road project is also the subject of a vast and recent development project carried by the Operation of national interest Alzette-Belval decreed on the 19 th of April 2011. Project managers and contracting authorities have arbitrarily decided to disregard the lack of study of this remarkable transborder biological corridor and have decided to use it in its entirety as a location for future development projects (see Appendix 3). For these reasons, the future road would not only have a direct impact on the area, but also indirect and cumulated impacts. Geographical areas subject to the cumulated effects should be further examined with specific regards to the accumulation of impacts, because the road project combined with the development project could have direct and indirect impacts, either temporary or permanent, on the conservation status of habitats and species the nearby Natura 2000 areas are aimed to protect. - With regard to the conservation objectives for habitats and species listed in the Natura 2000 areas: Below are examples of three species under strict conservation objectives in the Luxembourgish Natura 2000 areas. The three species are also present on the French areas directly affected by the road project. Elements from the 2011 application for an exemption to destroy protected species, along with these conservation objectives, portend major conservation impacts: - Large Copper (Lycaena dispar) and Marsh Fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia): The conservation objective for these two species in Natura 2000 areas LU0001028 and LU0001030 is maintaining a favourable conservation status and healthy populations. Both species are present on the route of the road with a conservation status on the studied area characterised as medium to bad for the Large Copper and as good for the Marsh Fritillary. On pages 248 to 252 of the 2011 exemption report for the destruction of protected animal species, it is written that both species function in metapopulations with a dispersal distance of several kilometres between distinct areas which suggests a population exchange with at least three Natura 2000 areas for the Large Copper and at least one Natura 2000 area for the Marsh Fritillary. Because identified impacts of the road project include the destruction of individuals and larvae, the fragmentation of population cores and the destruction of favourable habitats, the road project could prevent the achievement of conservation objectives in the Natura 2000 areas in close proximity. This is a higher risk for the Marsh Fritillary due to its conservation status, unfavourable bad in Luxembourg and unfavourable inadequate in France (continental biogeographical region) according to the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity, 2009. - Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus): the proven impact of the project (see exemption report page 147) for this species on the route of the road is the destruction of migratory corridors on a local scale with isolation of populations at the west of the route. This impact Tél. : 09 50 30 95 60 fax : 03 29 76 83 68 E-mail : mirabel-lne @ wanadoo.fr - web : http://mirabel.lne.free.fr 2/4

could undermine the objectives established in the Natura 2000 areas LU0001028 and LU0001030 of maintaining a favourable conservation status for populations of this species. Other species (protected by annex II of Council Directive 92/43/EEC and by annex I of Council Directive 79/409/EEC) and habitats identified on the route of the project are also present on the Natura 2000 sites previously cited. Without impact assessment of this project, one may legitimately wonder whether their disruption or destruction will prevent objectives towards a favourable conservation status from being achieved. These habitats are 6210 - Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates and 6510 - Lowland hay meadows (nonexhaustive list) and the following species : Myotis bechsteinii, Myotis emarginatus, Myotis myotis, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Callimorpha quadripunctaria and possibly Felis sylvestris ; as well as Milvus migrans, Falco peregrinus, Pernis apivorus, Bubo bubo, Dryocopus martius, Dendrocopos medius, Lullula arborea, Lanius collurio, Alcedo athis (non-exhaustive list). It should be noted that the study concerning the wildcat (Felis syslvestris) is omitted from the initial environmental state and from the exemption report, and that flight paths and hunting areas for bats were insufficiently researched. It should also be noted that the Jersey Tiger (Eupaglia quadripunctaria) is not mentioned or researched in the studies, or the exemption report, despite this species being present throughout the study area for the road project and despite an objective being set on the site LU0001030 for the restoration of a favourable conservation status for these populations. The numerous impacts that this road construction project will have on these species and habitats (disturbance and destruction of individual members of species, destruction of calcareous grasslands and of ecological corridors, disturbance to established patterns of flight, fragmentation and isolation of various populations, significant increases in human presence on the site, substantial loss of areas of great natural interest, very high risk of collision with large fauna and destruction of amphibian breeding areas) are likely to affect the maintaining of populations in a favorable conservation status in Natura 2000 areas. Finally, above and beyond the obvious need to support and preserve the existing diverse populations of flora and fauna, we would like to draw to your attention very succinctly the legislation s outline to which this road building project is subject in particular of its impacts on Natura 2000 protected areas. Based on precautionary principles, the European Directive Habitats imposes an obligation to perform an impact assessment in cases where a Natura 2000 site may be affected by a project and where there exists a likelihood that the project could compromise the objective of the preservation of protected sites. There are numerous precedents in the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union that demonstrate its view that uncertainty regarding the effects of a given project necessitates the undertaking of an impact assessment. Additionally, French jurisprudence tends to reject the application of the letter of the national law (notably: Ordinance No. 2033-321 of 11 th April 2011 which creates Article L.414-4 of the Environmental Code that was in effect when the Declaration of public interest was adopted in 2005) given its overly restrictive approach to the goals of the directive. In view of the foregoing, we request that this road-building project be the subject of a Natura 2000 impact assessment. We believe that permission to start this work should not be granted without a Natura 2000 ecological impact assessment as, without such an investigation, there is nothing to indicate that these sites will not be damaged. The administration could incur liability by allowing work in breach of the mentioned provisions. In addition, this project has been the subject in 2009 of two procedures under the Water Act Tél. : 09 50 30 95 60 fax : 03 29 76 83 68 E-mail : mirabel-lne @ wanadoo.fr - web : http://mirabel.lne.free.fr 3/4

(declaration for the meurthe-et-mosellan part, and permission for the mosellan part), it is in fact subject to evaluation (the law No. 2008-757 of 1 st august 2008 has specifically extended the implementation of impact assessments to installations subject to declaration). Taking into account all the foregoing points, we would ask that this road building project be the subject of a Natura 2000 ecological impact assessment. We feel that assessment should be undertaken concurrently and in cooperation with characterization of ecological and transboundary features soon initiated by various studies in the territory as part of Operation of national interest in the planning stages. Hoping that you will take action to preserve at long-term this ecological transboundary corridor, and waiting from you for clarifications about your intentions, please kindly accept, Excellencies, the expression of our sincere greetings. APPENDIX : APPENDIX 1 : Situation map (source MIRABEL LNE, December 2011) APPENDIX 2 : Outstanding listed natural areas and biological continuity (source l'atelier des Territoires, July 2011) APPENDIX 3 : Proposals outlined by the foreshadowing mission Alzette-Belval (source Mission de Préfiguration OIN Alzette-Belval, 25 th May 2011) APPENDIX 4 : English translation of the original text Tél. : 09 50 30 95 60 fax : 03 29 76 83 68 E-mail : mirabel-lne @ wanadoo.fr - web : http://mirabel.lne.free.fr 4/4