Project and procedures to improve some Aircraft Types models and Fuel Consumption estimates in the Eurocontrol Small emitters tool

Similar documents
MONITORING IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TABLE

RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: AS OF: 25 May 2017 Version:

International Civil Aviation Organization. UNDP/ICAO Regional Project RLA/98/003 Transition to the CNS/ATM Systems in the CAR and SAM Regions

AUSTRALIAN AIRSPACE MONITORING AGENCY (AAMA) RVSM MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS: AS OF: 4 December 2014

Small Group Exercise 1: Emissions Monitoring Plan

Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA):

Draft Proposal for the Amendment of the Sub-Cap on Off-Peak Landing & Take Off Charges at Dublin Airport. Addendum to Commission Paper CP4/2003

Session 2: CORSIA MRV System: Monitoring of CO 2 Emissions

Enhanced Time Based Separation (ETBS) & RECAT EU. Heathrow Crew Briefing

ICAO CORSIA CO 2 Estimation and Reporting Tool (CERT) Design, Development and Validation

OPERATING HOURS AND FACILITATION PARAMETERS & PRINCIPLES FOR SALZBURG AIRPORT

Analysis of en-route vertical flight efficiency

SAMPLE. If your competent authority requires you to hand in a signed paper copy of the report, please use the space below for signature:

1.0 OUTLINE OF NOISE ANALYSIS...3

Frequently Asked Questions. Free allocation from the Special Reserve (Art 3f ETS Directive 1 )

Session 1: Overview of CORSIA Introduction to the CORSIA and Resolution A39-3. ICAO Secretariat

OPERATING HOURS AND FACILITATION PARAMETERS & PRINCIPLES FOR SALZBURG AIRPORT

Tariff regulations for the commercial airport Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden valid from April 1 st 2018

ICAO Initiatives on Aircraft Noise

DEADLINE APPROACHES FOR AVIATION CARBON FOOTPRINT CAP

ATTACHMENT to State letter AN 1/17-09/093 QUESTIONNAIRE CONCERNING VOLUNTARY ACTIVITY FOR GHG REDUCTION/MITIGATION IN THE AVIATION SECTOR

Guyana Civil Aviation Authority. ATR Form M Instructions

EUROCONTROL method for estimating aviation fuel burnt and emissions --- EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2016

Commission proposal for European Regional Airspace Approach for the EU Emission Trading for Aviation - Frequently asked questions

AVIATION ENVIRONMENT CIRCULAR 2 OF 2013

Atennea Air. The most comprehensive ERP software for operating & financial management of your airline

Briefing: ICAO Council discussion on including aviation in the EU-ETS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

IRISH AVIATION AUTHORITY DUBLIN POINT MERGE. Presented by James O Sullivan PANS-OPS & AIRSPACE INSPECTOR Irish Aviation Authority

TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION

IFR FLIGHT BRIEFING. This IFR flight briefing presentation has been made concise and simple in order to easily handle the IFR flight preparation.

GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE (GIACC)

Efficiency and Environment KPAs

ANNEX II to EASA Opinion No 09/2017. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX

1/2 July Draft Commission Implementing Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 (Surveillance Performance and Interoperability SPI)

Page 1 sur 21 LFLB - W1819

ACI EUROPE POSITION. on the revision of. EU DIRECTIVE 2002/30 (noise-related operating restrictions at community airports)

PPR REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESS AND GENERAL AVIATION AT EINDHOVEN AIRPORT

QUESTIONNAIRE CONCERNING VOLUNTARY ACTIVITY FOR GHG REDUCTION/MITIGATION IN THE AVIATION SECTOR

Flight Efficiency Initiative

FINAL REPORT OF THE USOAP CMA AUDIT OF THE CIVIL AVIATION SYSTEM OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

WAKE TURBULENCE RE-CATEGORISATION ON APPROACH AND DEPARTURE FOR SAFE AND MORE EFFICIENT AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

ACI EUROPE POSITION. on the revision of. EU DIRECTIVE 2002/30 (noise-related operating restrictions at community airports)

3) There have some basic terminology of a flight plan and it is the fuel calculations

Quality Assurance. Introduction Need for quality assurance Answer to the need of quality assurance Details on quality assurance Conclusion A B C D E

Aviation Regulation Latest Developments and Their Impact for Industry

Frequently Asked Questions

Ordinance on the Acquisition of Data on Tonne-Kilometres performed by Aircraft

The European Experience Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)

Novosti na področju zakonodaje

Cairns Airport Aircraft Noise Information Report

Internalising external costs. Policy instruments to internalise externalities at airports

RPAS/UAS Challenges in ATM. Peter Tannhäuser. Head of Legal Service 15 July 2015

CORSIA EMISSIONS MONITORING PLAN SAMPLE

Reg. 29/2009 (DLS) Exemptions

Insert new Standards in Section II, including Appendix 3, applicable from 20 November 2008, and Attachment F as follows:

LFLS W1819. Page 1 sur 19

Aircraft Noise Technology and International Noise Standards. Dr. Neil Dickson, Environment Officer Environment, ICAO Air Transport Bureau

ICAO Options for Allocating International Aviation CO2 Emissions between Countries an Assessment

ACI Noise Rating Index and its applications

Wake Turbulence Standards

Entry of Flight Identity

SESAR Active ECAC ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Airport Charges Catalogue for Zurich Airport. Valid from September 1, 2016

Beyond Fuel Efficiency

L 342/20 Official Journal of the European Union

According to the approval Ministry of Transport NRW dated June 21, Mr. Martin Dall Director Controlling / Logistics

EASA ATM/ANS regulatory update

Quantile Regression Based Estimation of Statistical Contingency Fuel. Lei Kang, Mark Hansen June 29, 2017

Terms of Reference for rulemaking task RMT.0704

ICAO ATFM SEMINAR. Dubai, UAE, 14 December 2016

Official Journal of the European Union L 7/3

Insert new Standards, including Appendix 6, applicable from 20 November 2008, and Attachment F as follows:

SRC POSITION PAPER. Edition March 2011 Released Issue

AIRPORT CHARGES REGULATION

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2) thereof,

SESAR Active ECAC INF07 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Airworthiness Directive Policy PO.CAP

RECAT-EU. European Wake Turbulence Categorisation and Separation Minima on Approach and Departure

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Current practice of separation delivery at major European airports ATM R&D Seminar, June 2015, Lisbon

MONITORING PLAN FOR TONNE-KILOMETRE DATA

ICAO Regional Seminar on CORSIA Session 1: Overview of CORSIA CORSIA Administrative Aspects and Timelines

Airport capacity effects of RECAT or: An airport view on RECAT

European Joint Industry CDA Action Plan

ACTION: Notice of new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Requirements for Air Traffic Services (ATS)

IBAC Technical Report Summary. Meeting: APANPIRG 14, Bangkok, August 4 through August 7, 2003.

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority. Telecomm & Information Services Unit

Performance Indicator Horizontal Flight Efficiency

Transport Expert Panel. Summary Report Krakow,

Proposal for the updating of the FASID ATM Evolution Tables

EAM 2 / GUI 10 GUIDANCE FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE ANNUAL SUMMARY TEMPLATE

Flight inspection service of LGS Radionavigation Aids in 2017

AIRPORT CHARGES REGULATION

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Public Information Meeting

Council of the European Union Brussels, 14 October 2016 (OR. en)

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE

Transcription:

Project and procedures to improve some Aircraft Types models and Fuel Consumption estimates in the Eurocontrol Small emitters tool 1- Background: The aim of this project is to update the Eurocontrol Fuel estimator, also called Small Emitters tool ( SE tool hereafter) in the Emission Trading Scheme context. The project planning is to get an operational and on-line updated SE tool before end October 2011 so that every concerned party can use the tool and benefit from its improved performances for the next 2012 reporting period based on 2011 Traffic. The latest date for Aircraft Operators who are willing to contribute for submitting to Eurocontrol (antonio.astorino@eurocontrol.int) their detailed actual fuel burn data is 1st September 2011. Data submitted after this date will not be considered for the update exercise this year. The development by Eurocontrol of the SE tool started in 2009 and was sponsored by the European Commission. On 9 July 2010 the Commission adopted a Regulation on the approval of the SE tool developed by Eurocontrol to estimate the fuel consumption of certain small emitting aircraft operators. The very first application by the European Commission of the Eurocontrol SE tool was the calculation of the aviation historical emission for the ETS, for year 2004-2006 (See publication by Commission of EU ETS Aviation historical emission on 7 March 2011). Consequently the SE tool was also found reliable and robust enough to be an aid for Aircraft Operators interested and authorised (Small emitter) to use it in the context of the MRV (reference) for simplified monitoring procedure (Part 4 of Annex XIV of the Guidelines on monitoring, reporting and verification (Decision 2007/589/EC), as well as for data gap procedure (Part 5 of Annex XIV..). The SE tool is actually a computation algorithm based on ANCAT/EMEP CORINAIR methodology that indicates the fuel burn estimation when an ICAO Aircraft type and a distance flown are passed to the algorithm. The SE tool has been built in 2009 using a statistical analysis of actual fuel burn records, on a flight by flight basis, as provided by volunteer Aircraft Operators to Eurocontrol. Since November 2010 the ETS Support Facilities (ETS-SF) are available for the benefit of Member States and Competent Authorities (CA) and also for Aircraft Operators (AO) who are paying for specific associated services. All these Eurocontrol services and deliverables are also using the fuel estimations of the SE tool in their background. The SE tool itself can be visualised and used in a standalone for as an excel calculation sheet that can be found at http://www.eurocontrol.int/environment/public/standard_page/small_emitters.html.

In the long term perspective, Eurocontrol is willing to regularly update the SE tool with actual fuel burn data to be collected from Aircraft Operators. Priority is given to improve the Aircrafts types that are not presently optimally modelled (because of a lack of actual fuel burn data during the initial building phase). The updating of the aircraft types already well modelled, with more recent actual fuel burn data so to reflect ATM or airframes changes (winglets or flaps, new and better routes network etc..), will be the subject of a separate project. The evolutions of the SE tool will help every parties, and Aircraft Operators in first place, to answer to the best to the exigencies of the MRV. This document explains the actual fuel burn data requirements that Aircraft Operators must respect if they wish to contribute to this Eurocontrol project that addresses the aircraft types that are not presently optimally modelled and that are listed hereafter. The contributing Aircraft operators will get a direct benefice as their data will improve the performances and accuracy of the SE tool and consequently the fuel estimations for their own flights. 2- Aircraft Types to be improved: Small Emitter TOOL Aircraft Types that required updating Global statistics Nb of Aircrafts Types Models to be improved MTOM ABOVE 5,7 MTOM BELOW 5,7 Heavy Jet Jet Turbo Prop Jet Turbo Prop Grand Total 35 147 83 231 71 567 It should be understood that these 265 (35+147+83) not optimally modelled Aircrafts types represent in total less than 6 % of the total CO2 that is emitted in EU27. 302 (231+71) Aircraft types are less than 5,7 tonnes so they do not account in the ETS as the related associated traffic can be exempted (see Annex I to Directive 2008/101/CE). As a consequence there is no urgent need to improved them. So the overall impact of the not optimally modelled 265 Aircraft types at the aviation sector level is not very important but it can be very different from an individual operator perspective who owns one of these Aircraft type even if he has only few flights.

Hereafter is the list of top 127 aircraft types (out of the 265 total types) AND that show traffic in 2010. These 127 aircraft types would need to be improved in priority and as soon as possible. As explained earlier this will be realised by the gathering of additional actual fuel burn data from Aircraft Operators. Small Emitter TOOL Aircraft Types that required improved modelling Detailed Lists (both tables have the same contents but left table is sorted by Type name and right Table is sorted by Aircraft Type popularity in AOs fleets) Aircraft Type code Aircraft Types by Name Nb of Operators using the type Total Nb of 2010 nonexempted but associated flights Aircraft Types by Popularity in AOs Fleets Total Nb of 2010 nonexempted Nb of Aircraft Operators but Type using the associated code type flights A124 10 2.347 CL60 382 20.321 A139 26 3.348 GLEX 191 9.877 A148 2 642 CL30 143 9.984 A225 2 13 C25B 129 16.356 A388 7 7.133 FA50 115 6.783 A4 1 12 LJ60 111 9.885 AN12 19 2.899 C680 101 8.431 AN22 1 1 C750 85 3.734 AN24 8 383 GALX 81 5.215 AN28 6 32 LJ45 76 9.438 AN32 1 8 FA7X 76 6.098 AN72 6 56 GL5T 72 3.230 AS32 12 1.176 C560 55 8.090 ASTR 17 574 GLF3 55 876 AT8T 10 110 LJ35 54 2.882 ATLA 1 11 E190 43 161.910 B25 1 1 FA20 35 1.576 B701 2 7 IL76 31 3.779 B703 6 57 BE30 31 1.806 B712 7 9.479 L410 30 12.144 B739 8 9.486 SW4 26 15.023 BE30 31 1.806 A139 26 3.348 BER2 2 2 GLF2 26 303 C160 4 100 LJ40 25 3.781 C17 4 16 T154 25 1.331 C212 10 176 J328 24 6.984 C25B 129 16.356 HA4T 24 735 C27J 5 87 LJ55 24 705 C295 3 44 G150 22 1.385 C30J 5 54 YK42 21 850 C551 2 152 DH8A 20 81.488

C560 55 8.090 AN12 19 2.899 C680 101 8.431 FA10 19 1.584 C750 85 3.734 JS32 18 18.990 CL2P 2 12 E120 17 10.832 CL2T 5 474 LJ31 17 1.434 CL30 143 9.984 H25C 17 787 CL60 382 20.321 ASTR 17 574 CN35 9 45 D228 16 4.948 D228 16 4.948 DH8B 14 4.824 DC3 10 48 DHC6 14 204 DC3T 1 7 AS32 12 1.176 DC6 1 17 MI8 12 78 DC86 9 826 T204 11 1.465 DC87 4 166 A124 10 2.347 DH8A 20 81.488 EC25 10 265 DH8B 14 4.824 C212 10 176 DHC6 14 204 AT8T 10 110 E120 17 10.832 DC3 10 48 E190 43 161.910 DC86 9 826 E2 1 2 YK40 9 624 E3CF 1 1 CN35 9 45 E3TF 1 1 B739 8 9.486 EC25 10 265 AN24 8 383 EH10 1 2 S92 8 302 EUFI 3 25 IL62 8 134 F16 3 4 B712 7 9.479 F18 1 1 A388 7 7.133 F60 2 8 B703 6 57 FA10 19 1.584 AN72 6 56 FA20 35 1.576 AN28 6 32 FA50 115 6.783 KA27 6 13 FA7X 76 6.098 IL96 5 1.356 G150 22 1.385 L188 5 1.231 G159 3 8 CL2T 5 474 G222 1 1 C27J 5 87 GALX 81 5.215 C30J 5 54 GL5T 72 3.230 DC87 4 166 GLEX 191 9.877 C160 4 100 GLF2 26 303 MU30 4 73 GLF3 55 876 S61 4 40 H25A 2 2 LJ25 4 36 H25C 17 787 SJ30 4 26 H53 1 2 C17 4 16 HA4T 24 735 SBR1 3 164 HAWK 1 11 S64 3 107 HUNT 3 11 C295 3 44 IL62 8 134 EUFI 3 25 IL76 31 3.779 L29B 3 25 IL96 5 1.356 HUNT 3 11 J328 24 6.984 PUMA 3 10 JS32 18 18.990 G159 3 8 JU52 1 5 F16 3 4

K35R 1 11 L101 3 4 KA27 6 13 A148 2 642 L101 3 4 C551 2 152 L159 1 2 A225 2 13 L188 5 1.231 CL2P 2 12 L29B 3 25 F60 2 8 L410 30 12.144 WW24 2 8 LJ25 4 36 B701 2 7 LJ31 17 1.434 MI26 2 5 LJ35 54 2.882 M55 2 4 LJ40 25 3.781 BER2 2 2 LJ45 76 9.438 H25A 2 2 LJ55 24 705 M28 2 2 LJ60 111 9.885 DC6 1 17 M28 2 2 VF14 1 16 M346 1 6 A4 1 12 M55 2 4 ATLA 1 11 MI26 2 5 HAWK 1 11 MI8 12 78 K35R 1 11 MU30 4 73 AN32 1 8 NH90 1 1 DC3T 1 7 PUMA 3 10 M346 1 6 R722 1 1 JU52 1 5 S2P 1 3 S601 1 5 S601 1 5 WB57 1 4 S61 4 40 S2P 1 3 S64 3 107 T134 1 3 S92 8 302 TOR 1 3 SB29 1 2 VC10 1 3 SBR1 3 164 Y130 1 3 SJ30 4 26 E2 1 2 SW4 26 15.023 EH10 1 2 T134 1 3 H53 1 2 T154 25 1.331 L159 1 2 T204 11 1.465 SB29 1 2 TOR 1 3 W3 1 2 VC10 1 3 AN22 1 1 VF14 1 16 B25 1 1 W3 1 2 E3CF 1 1 WB57 1 4 E3TF 1 1 WW24 2 8 F18 1 1 Y130 1 3 G222 1 1 YK40 9 624 NH90 1 1 YK42 21 850 R722 1 1 The remaining 138 Aircrafts types that would also need to be updated are in Annex 1. These aircrafts did not show any traffic in Europe in 2010, so it is likely that the related traffic and impact in the next years (if any) will be marginal.

3- Actual Fuel Burn data records requirements The objective of Eurocontrol is to characterise the aircrafts types as in the Table above by gathering actual fuel burn data from the Aircraft Operators. As some aircraft types in the above Table show a limited traffic (less than 1000 movements in average per Operator in 2010), it is recommended that the full year flight and actual fuel burn data for 2010 or 2011 (or both) are provided by the individual AO concerned. For those aircraft types that are in bold in the above list and that show more than 1000 flights in 2010 per Individual Operator in Average, AOs concerned can provide a sub set of their 2010 or 2011 traffic, it is recommended that data are provided for at least one month in the summer period and one month in winter period in 2010 (or 2011). File format and Mandatory minimum data per individual flight record: The data will have to be provided to Eurocontrol preferably in a Microsoft Excel file or eventually in a Comma separated value text file (csv). The column fields will be as follows in the proposed order. The Aircraft Identification as filed in field 7 of flight Plan for each flight record (Aircraft Registration Number or Operating Agency ICAO Code as in ICAO Doc 8585 followed by Flight Number) Departure Airport ICAO Designator (4 letters Code, as per ICAO doc 7910) Destination Airport ICAO designator (4 letters Code, as per ICAO doc 7910) Aircraft Type ICAO designator (as per ICAO doc 8643) and that must be one of the types in the above Table Total Fuel burn gate-to-gate (block-consumption) (in kg) Total Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) fuel burn (in KG, null or N/A if not applicable) Off-Blocks date and time (UTC) On-blocks date and time (UTC) The APU fuel that is to be reported can be either before off-block of the flight or after on-block of the flight as presented in the two next diagrams:

On-block time of previous flight Off-block time On-block time Flight fuel Burn gate-to-gate to be reported APU fuel Burn To be reported Total Fuel burn as per EC directive Or Off-block time On-block time Off-block time of next flight Flight fuel Burn gate-to-gate to be reported Total Fuel burn as per EC directive APU fuel burn to be reported Here is an example of an Excel file that is expected: Field 7 of Flight Plan ORIG- ADEP DEST- ADES AC_TYPE BLOCK_ CONSUM- PTION KG APU CONSUM- PTION KG OFFBLOK _UTC ONBLOK _UTC OPA123 or RegMark LFPG LFBO A310 6640 150 01-09-2010 0:04 01-09-2010 1:04 Complementary Information that could also be provided: Each flight record with the above information may be extended with the following additional fields that will ease some of the data quality checks that must be passed by each data records:

IFPLID, unique number attributed by CFMU composed by 2 letters with 6 numbers (rolling number on 15 years basis) that is included in the confirmation message of the flight plan from CFMU to the Aircraft Operators The Aircraft registration Mark if not provided in the Field 7 of Flight Plan Actual Route Length according to flight records (in km or NM but indicate the unit). 4- Aircraft type Modelling by Eurocontrol Eurocontrol will perform data quality and validity checks on each data set submitted. When checks have been passed, the data sets from several AOs with the same Aircraft type will be merged and used to model the aircraft type with an improved precision. 5- Confidentiality The data provided by Aircraft Operators to Eurocontrol will be used by Eurocontrol only and solely for the exercise of updating the Small Emitter tool. Individual flight data shall not be published by Eurocontrol. The resulting Small Emitter tool will only be made public using the Generic ICAO Aircraft Type code with no indication of the actual Aircraft Operator name or owner identity that has provided the data. 6- Contact Person in Eurocontrol Please forward your data files or any questions to antonio.astorino@eurocontrol.int

ANNEX 1 AIRCARFT TYPES IN SE TOOL but without non-exempted traffic in 2010 ALL AICRAFT TYPES ARE ABOVE 5,7 TONNES From ICAO Doc 8543 ICAO_TYPE_CODE WTC Description type Nb of engines Engine type A1 M Landplane 1 Piston A10 M Landplane 2 Jet A140 M Landplane 2 Turboprop A50 H Landplane 4 Jet A6 M Landplane 2 Jet A660 L Landplane 1 Turboprop A7 M Landplane 1 Jet A743 M Landplane 2 Jet A748 M Landplane 2 Turboprop AJET M Landplane 2 Jet ALIZ M Landplane 1 Turboprop AMX M Landplane 1 Jet AN30 M Landplane 2 Turboprop AN70 M Landplane 4 Turboprop B1 H Landplane 4 Jet B2 H Landplane 4 Jet B214 M Helicopter 1 Turboprop B24 M Landplane 4 Piston B26 M Landplane 2 Piston B52 H Landplane 8 Jet B609 M Tilt-wing 2 Turboprop B720 M Landplane 4 Jet BE12 M Amphibian 2 Turboprop BE32 M Landplane 2 Turboprop BELF M Landplane 4 Turboprop BSTP M Helicopter 2 Turboprop C119 M Landplane 2 Piston C123 M Landplane 2 Piston C125 M Landplane 3 Piston C135 H Landplane 4 Jet C141 H Landplane 4 Jet C15 M Landplane 4 Jet C2 M Landplane 2 Turboprop C46 M Landplane 2 Piston C5 H Landplane 4 Jet C97 M Landplane 4 Piston CAT M Amphibian 2 Piston CNBR M Landplane 2 Jet CONI M Landplane 4 Piston CVLP M Landplane 2 Piston CVLT M Landplane 2 Turboprop

DC85 H Landplane 4 Jet DH83 L Landplane 1 Piston DHC4 M Landplane 2 Piston DHC5 M Landplane 2 Turboprop E121 L Landplane 2 Turboprop E6 H Landplane 4 Jet ETAR M Landplane 1 Jet F1 M Landplane 2 Jet F104 M Landplane 1 Jet F117 M Landplane 2 Jet F14 M Landplane 2 Jet F15 M Landplane 2 Jet F2 M Landplane 1 Jet F22 M Landplane 2 Jet F4 M Landplane 2 Jet F5 M Landplane 2 Jet FREL M Helicopter 3 Turboprop G4SG L Landplane 1 Jet GFLY M Landplane 1 Jet GSPN L Landplane 2 Jet H46 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop H47 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop H60 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop H64 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop HAR M Landplane 1 Jet HERN L Landplane 4 Piston HF20 M Landplane 2 Jet I114 M Landplane 2 Turboprop IL14 M Landplane 2 Piston IL18 M Landplane 4 Turboprop IL38 M Landplane 4 Turboprop IL86 H Landplane 4 Jet JAGR M Landplane 2 Jet JCOM M Landplane 2 Jet JS20 L Landplane 2 Turboprop K35E H Landplane 4 Jet L29A M Landplane 4 Jet METR M Landplane 2 Jet MG21 M Landplane 1 Jet MG29 M Landplane 2 Jet MI14 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop MI24 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop MI28 M Helicopter 2 Turboprop MIR2 M Landplane 1 Jet MIRA M Landplane 1 Jet MP20 L Landplane 1 Piston MRF1 M Landplane 1 Jet N262 M Landplane 2 Turboprop NIM M Landplane 4 Jet P38 M Landplane 2 Piston P47 M Landplane 1 Piston PEMB L Landplane 2 Piston

PRM1 L Landplane 2 Jet PRTS L Landplane 2 Jet R721 M Landplane 3 Jet RFAL M Landplane 2 Jet S2T M Landplane 2 Turboprop S3 M Landplane 2 Jet S4 L Landplane 1 Piston S61R M Helicopter 2 Turboprop SB05 L Landplane 2 Jet SB35 M Landplane 1 Jet SB37 M Landplane 1 Jet SB39 M Landplane 1 Jet SBR2 M Landplane 2 Jet SK70 L Landplane 2 Piston STAR L Landplane 2 Turboprop SU17 M Landplane 1 Jet SU25 M Landplane 2 Jet SU27 M Landplane 2 Jet SW2 L Landplane 2 Turboprop T160 H Landplane 4 Jet T2 L Landplane 2 Jet T22M M Landplane 2 Jet T33 M Landplane 1 Jet T334 M Landplane 2 Jet T37 L Landplane 2 Jet TBM M Landplane 1 Piston TCAT M Landplane 2 Piston TIGR L Helicopter 2 Turboprop TPIN L Landplane 2 Piston TU95 H Landplane 4 Turboprop U2 M Landplane 1 Jet UH1 L Helicopter 1 Turboprop V22 M Tilt-wing 2 Turboprop YS11 M Landplane 2 Turboprop YURO M Landplane 2 Jet And also the following unknown types as they have no correspondent in ICAO doc 8543 : AN74 AT42 B727 CNTL DA7X DO24 HRZN K35A MIR4 TU142 Jet Heavy Jet Turbo Prop Jet Heavy Jet Turbo Prop Turbo Prop Heavy Jet Jet Turbo Prop