PBCS Charter Concept

Similar documents
Excerpts from ICAO PBCS Manual

GOLD / PBCS Operational Approval (Compliance)

Advisory Circular. Special Authorization (SA) for Required Communications Performance (RCP) 240 and Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) 180

GOLD. Global Operational Data Link Document. Introduction to RCP and RSP

Performance Based Communication and Surveillance in the ICAO North Atlantic Region. PBCS in NAT HLA

OPERATIONS CIRCULAR. Subject: Performance Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) OC NO 01 of 2018 Date: 23 rd March 2018

Manual on Monitoring the Application of Performance-based Horizontal Separation Minima

Federal Aviation Administration. PBCS: Operator Approvals UNITED STATES. NAT PBCS Workshop/ February 2018 Paris, France

AFI REGIONAL DATA LINK MONITORING AGENCY (DL/CMRA)

Global Operational Data Link Doc 10037

PBCS Flight Plan RCP RSP Codes

Problem Reporting and System Performance Analysis

Performance Based Communication and Surveillance

AFI Plan Aerodromes Certification Project Workshop for ESAF Region (Nairobi, Kenya, August 2016)

RNP AR APCH Approvals: An Operator s Perspective

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Combined ASIOACG and INSPIRE Working Group Meeting, 2013 Dubai, UAE, 11 th to 14 th December 2013

Overview of Worldwide Data Link Equipage Mandates

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /2010

Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD) 1-1

Checklist. Has the State established a national committee for Public Health Emergency planning? IHR Annex 1, A, 3

(Presented by the Secretariat)

ICAO provisions on data link implementation

PROJECT: EUR/SAM CORRIDOR AIRSPACE CONCEPT

CHAPTER 7 AEROPLANE COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION COOPERATIVE ARRANGEMENT FOR THE PREVENTION OF SPREAD OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASE THROUGH AIR TRAVEL (CAPSCA)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 255/2010 of 25 March 2010 laying down common rules on air traffic flow management

The contribution of the ATM SATCOM Safety Board (ASSB) Filippo Tomasello Rulemaking Official (EASA) Chair of the ASSB 10 Oct. 2011

Air traffic services (ATS) datalink using Iris Precursor. Contextual note SESAR Solution description form for deployment planning

International Airport Assistance Visit Checklist

GOLD. Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD) Implementation and Amendments. AFI CNS SG /4, Dakar, Senegal, July 2011

Screening Chapter 14 Transport. Single European Sky (SES) 18 December Transport

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Regional Annex 19 Safety Management

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

PBN Operational Approval Oceanic and Remote En Route Navigation Specifications

AVIATION > ICAO NAT PBCS/2. Inmarsat Update. ICAO NAT PBCS Workshop/2 Paris June th, 2015 Presented by Andrew Ives

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

Space Based ADS-B. ICAO SAT meeting - June 2016 AIREON LLC PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

ADS-B Implementation and Regulation Meeting for the NAM/CAR/SAM Regions 26 to 30 November 2018 Mexico City, Mexico

RECOMMENDED GUIDANCE FOR FPL AND RELATED ATS MESSAGES

AIS Basics - NOTAM, AIP, Amendments, Supplements, Circulars, Charts, and NOTAM Putting the basics in place

MULTIDISCIPLINARYMEETING REGARDING GLOBAL TRACKING

DP-7 The need for QMS controlled processes in AIS/AIM. Presentation to QMS for AIS/MAP Service Implementation Workshop Dakar, Senegal, May 2011

Official Journal of the European Union L 186/27

North Atlantic Initiatives

RNP 2 JOB AID REQUEST TO CONDUCT RNP 2 OPERATIONS

Quality Management System (QMS)

European Aviation Safety Agency

Inmarsat GADSS Solutions Global Aeronautical Distress and Safety System

SRC POSITION PAPER. Edition March 2011 Released Issue

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, PAKISTAN OPERATIONAL CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTENTS

ICAO Regulatory Framework and Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme

Aerodrome Certification Applicable provisions

SOUTH AFRICA PBN NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PROJECT

TERMS OF REFERENCE Special Committee (SC) 216 Aeronautical Systems Security (Revision 8)

2012 Performance Framework AFI

Certification Procedure

AIRWORTHINESS PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 26. Modifications and Repairs

IRELAND SAFETY REGULATION DIVISION

Seychelles Civil Aviation Authority SAFETY DIRECTIVE. This Safety Directive contains information that is intended for mandatory compliance.

MID-SST/3-PPT/5 USOAP CMA UPDATE

SUMMARY REPORT ON THE SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT FOLLOW-UP OF THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION OF KUWAIT

AN INTRODUCTION TO PANS-AERODROMES (Doc 9981)

The support of an European ANSP

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

Working Draft. Satellite Voice Guidance Material (SVGM) Version Working Draft 14 February 2012

Any queries about the content of the attached document should be addressed to: ICAO EUR/NAT Office:

(i) Adopted or adapted airworthiness and environmental standards;

EXHIBIT K TERMINAL PROJECT PROCEDURES PHASE I - DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINAL PROGRAM & ALTERNATIVES

Technical Arrangement on Aircraft Maintenance between the Transport Canada Civil Aviation Directorate and the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand

FINAL REPORT OF THE USOAP CMA AUDIT OF THE CIVIL AVIATION SYSTEM OF THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY

ICAO Annex 14 Standards and Aerodrome Certification

Safety Management 1st edition

SESAR Active ECAC INF07 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Air Operator Certification

1/2 July Draft Commission Implementing Regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 1207/2011 (Surveillance Performance and Interoperability SPI)

Air/Ground ATN Implementation Status ATN Seminar, Chiang Mai - 11/14 December

RMT.0464 ATS Requirements The NPA

CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENT SECTION 3 AIR TRANSPORT SERIES C PART I ISSUE IV, 24 th March 2017 EFFECTIVE: FORTHWITH

AIR NAVIGATION COMMISSION

Technical Resources - Automation European AIS Database (EAD)

State Oversight Challenges

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task

Safety Regulatory Oversight of Commercial Operations Conducted Offshore

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

WORKSHOP 1 ICAO RPAS Panel Working Group 1 Airworthiness

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

SESAR Active ECAC ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

Regional air navigation planning and implementation performance framework: Review of programmes and projects

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Draft. COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /

OVERSEAS TERRITORIES AVIATION REQUIREMENTS (OTARs)

Implementation of the new CNS/ATM systems in the region

ICAO Global Provisions and Regional Strategy for the Introduction of GNSS Services in Africa-Indian Ocean (AFI) Region

AIRPORT VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT ON AIR PASSENGER SERVICE

WORKING TOGETHER TO ENHANCE AIRPORT OPERATIONAL SAFETY. Ermenando Silva APEX, in Safety Manager ACI, World

NPF/SIP/2011 NPF/SIP/2011--WP/20 WP/20

L 342/20 Official Journal of the European Union

CHG 0 9/13/2007 VOLUME 2 AIR OPERATOR AND AIR AGENCY CERTIFICATION AND APPLICATION PROCESS

Transcription:

PBCS Charter Concept Global Operational Data Link (GOLD) Familiarization with Performance Based Communications and Surveillance (PBCS) Workshop Dakar, Senegal 11-15 September 2017 Prepared by: FAA WJH Technical Center Separation Standards Analysis Branch Presented by: John Warburton ANG-E61 Administration

Overview Communication services provider (CSP) requirement Detailed Requirements from Appendices CSP/SSP Compliance Topics Final Considerations Administration 2

CSP/SSP Definition Communication services provider (CSP). Any public or private entity providing communication services for general air traffic. The services would include those provided by a satellite service provider (SSP) through a contract or agreement Satellite service provider (SSP). An entity or group of entities that provide, via satellite, aeronautical fixed services and/or aeronautical mobile services at least from the signal in space to/from aircraft, to the attachment point of the ground earth station (GES) to the ground communication services network. Administration 3

ANSP Contracted Services PBCS Manual 4.3.1.5 The ANSP should ensure that contracted services, such as with CSPs and aeronautical stations, are bound by contractual arrangements stipulating the RCP/RSP allocations, including any monitoring or recording requirements, and the guidelines of section 4.3.2. Administration 4

Communication services provision PBCS Manual Paragraph 4.3.2 The CSP should provide services that meet the RCP/RSP allocations provided in the specifications. These allocations are used to establish contractual arrangements, which support safety oversight and approval of both ANSP and the aircraft operator for provision and use of the services, respectively. The CSP should ensure that the services it provides adhere to the contractual arrangements, which include: a) RCP/RSP allocations, as contained in the appropriate RCP/RSP specification(s); and b) notification to ATS units, aircraft operators and others, as appropriate, of any failure condition that may impact PBCS operations. When a CSP holds a contract with an aircraft operator, but not with ATS units for airspace in which the aircraft operator operates, that CSP should also notify the appropriate the ATS units of any failure condition that may impact the aircraft operator s PBCS operations. The CSP should record and retain all communication and surveillance data, thereafter providing this data to ANSP and regional PBCS monitoring programmes upon request, when authorized by appropriate parties, in accordance with the contractual arrangements with the ANSP or aircraft operator. Administration 5

Aircraft Operator CSP Requirements PBCS Manual Paragraph 4.3.43-4 The aircraft operator should ensure that contracted services, such as those with CSPs, are bound by contractual arrangements stipulating the RCP/RSP allocations, including any monitoring or recording requirements, and the guidelines of section 4.3.2. The aircraft operator should ensure that contractual arrangements include a provision for the CSP to notify the appropriate ATS units for the route system of the aircraft operator in case failure conditions impact PBCS operations. Note. This provision ensures appropriate ATS units are notified in cases when the ANSP does not have a contractual arrangement with a particular CSP, and services are provided through internetworking among CSPs/SSPs. Administration 6

ANSP Detailed Requirements PBCS Appendix B & C 3.1.2 Availability RCP availability criteria Specification: RCP 400/D Application: CPDLC Component: ANSP Availability parameter Efficiency Safety Compliance means Availability service (A SERVICE ) N/A 0.999 Contract/service agreement terms. Note 1. For guidelines to aid in the development of the contract/service agreement with the CSP/SSP, see paragraph B.3.1.3, RCP 400/D allocations to CSP/SSP for RCP availability criteria. Note 2. The availability criteria are allocated entirely to A CSP/SSP and assume that the ATS unit s system is always available. RSP availability criteria Specification: RSP 180/D Application: ADS-C Component: ANSP Availability parameter Efficiency Safety Compliance means Availability service (A SERVICE ) 0.9999 0.999 Contract/service agreement terms. Note 1. For guidelines to aid in the development of the contract/service agreement with the CSP/SSP, see paragraph C.2.1.3, RSP 180/D allocations to CSP/SSP for surveillance availability criteria. Note 2. The availability criteria are allocated entirely to A CSP/SSP and assume that the ATS unit s system is always available. Administration 7

CSP/SSP Detailed Requirements PBCS Appendix B & C 3.1.3 Transaction Time RCP transaction time and continuity criteria Specification: RCP 240/D Application: CPDLC Component: CSP/SSP Transaction time parameter RCTP time allocations RCTP CSP/SSP (D1 to D2) + (D5 to D6) ET (sec) C = 99.9% TT (sec) C = 95% Compliance means 120 100 Contract/service agreement terms. Pre-implementation demonstration. RSP data delivery time and continuity criteria Specification: RSP 180/D Application: ADS-C Component: CSP/SSP Data delivery time parameter RSTP time allocations RSTP CSP/SSP (D1 to D2) OT (sec) C = 99.9% DT (sec) C = 95% Compliance means 170 84 Contract/service agreement terms. Pre-implementation demonstration. Administration 8

CSP/SSP Detailed Requirements PBCS Appendix B & C 3.1.3 Availability RCP availability criteria Specification: RCP 240/D Application: CPDLC Component: CSP/SSP Availability parameter Efficiency Safety Compliance means Availability CSP/SSP (A CSP/SSP ) 0.9999 0.999 Contract/service agreement terms Unplanned outage duration limit (minutes) 10 10 Contract/service agreement terms Maximum number of unplanned outages 4 48 Contract/service agreement terms Maximum accumulated unplanned outage time (minutes/year) Unplanned outage notification delay (minutes) 52 520 Contract/service agreement terms 5 5 Contract/service agreement terms Note. RTCA DO-306/EUROCAE ED-122 specifies a requirement to indicate loss of the service. Unplanned outage notification delay is an additional time value associated with the requirement to indicate the loss to the ANSP per the RCP related safety requirement SR-4 for the ANSP. RSP availability criteria Specification: RSP 180/D Application: ADS-C Component: CSP/SSP Availability parameter Efficiency Safety Compliance means Availability CSP/SSP (A CSP/SSP ) 0.9999 0.999 Contract/service agreement terms Unplanned outage duration limit (minutes) 10 10 Contract/service agreement terms Maximum number of unplanned outages 4 48 Contract/service agreement terms Maximum accumulated unplanned outage time (minutes/year) Unplanned outage notification delay (minutes) 52 520 Contract/service agreement terms 5 5 Contract/service agreement terms Note. The RSP availability criteria for RSP 180/D are the same as those provided for RCP 240/D. See Appendix B, paragraph B.2.1.3. Administration 9

CSP/SSP Detailed Requirements PBCS Appendix B & C 3.1.3 Integrity Criteria RCP integrity criteria Specification: RCP 240/D Application: CPDLC Component: CSP/SSP Integrity parameter Integrity value Compliance means Integrity (I) Not specified Contract/service agreement terms. Per RCP RSP related integrity safety criteria requirements SR-26 for the ANSP and SR-26 for the aircraft Specification: RSP 180/D Application: ADS-C Component: CSP/SSP system, the end system is required include provisions, consistent with the Integrity overall RCP integrity Integrity criteria, to mitigate the effects of Compliance means errors parameter introduced by the network. value These provisions require the network Integrity to (I) pass protected Not information specified (or Contract/service data) to the end agreement terms. Per surveillance related safety system without manipulating the protected requirements information SR-26 (or data) for the ANSP and SR-26 for the aircraft it passes. system, the end system is required include provisions, consistent Note. In formulating contract terms with with the the CSP/SSP, overall data the integrity criteria, to mitigate the effects of ANSP and/or operator may specify an integrity errors introduced value and by other network. These provisions require the related criteria, as appropriate, for the network, to including pass protected information (or data) to the end subnetworks, that will ensure acceptable system data integrity, without manipulating the protected information (or data) consistent with the assumptions used to it define passes. the end system provisions (e.g. CRC or Fletcher s checksum). Note. In formulating contract terms with the CSP/SSP, the ANSP and/or operator may specify an integrity value and other related criteria, as appropriate, for the network, including subnetworks, that will ensure acceptable data integrity, consistent with the assumptions used to define the end system provisions (e.g. CRC or Fletcher s checksum). Administration 10

Aircraft Operator PBCS Appendix B & C 2.1.5 RCP transaction time and continuity criteria Specification: RCP 240/D Application: CPDLC Component: Aircraft operator Transaction time parameter RCTP time allocations RCTP CSP/SSP (D1 to D2) + (D5 to D6) ET (sec) C = 99.9% TT (sec) C = 95% Compliance means 120 100 CSP/SSP contract/service agreement. See also paragraph B.2.1.3. Pre-implementation demonstration. RSP data delivery time and continuity criteria Specification: RSP 180/D Application: ADS-C Component: Aircraft operator Data delivery time parameter RSTP time allocations RSTP CSP/SSP (D1 to D2) OT (sec) C = 99.9% DT (sec) C = 95% Compliance means 170 84 CSP/SSP contract/service agreement. See also paragraph C.2.1.3. Pre-implementation demonstration. Administration 11

CSP Compliance CSP Perspective CSPs stated that they would be unable to enter into binding contracts/agreements The nature of the communication system is such that it is impossible for them to guarantee a certain performance to individual ANSPs and Aircraft Operators with their being many contributors affecting performance outside of the CSP domain It would take significant cost/effort to re-negotiate individual contracts currently in place between CSP and each operator as well as with each ANSP Administration 12 12

CSP Compliance PBCS Perspective Ensuring the compliance of CSP allocations through the ANSP and operator is particularly important because no direct State safety oversight requirements under existing Annex provisions ATS provision and aircraft operation are subject to the certification and/or SMS requirements under Annexes 6, 11 and 19 Difficult to justify absolving the CSPs from PBCS requirements while other stakeholders are expected to adhere to the stated terms of the PBCS concept Some States prefer an enforceable contract/agreement to specify performance and safety requirements for the CSPs Difficult to address identified deficiencies without an incentive (or penalty) to ensure that performance improvements be made within a reasonable timeframe Administration 13 13

CSP Compliance PBCS Charter PBCS charter concept proposed as an alternative means to ensure that each data link stakeholder meets its allocated responsibilities according to the RCP/RSP specifications PBCS Charter being developed by ICAO PBCS project team Will be available an alternate means of compliance for CSP contract/agreement needed for operator approval if State of Operator/State of Registry accepts as means of compliance Hosted on the DLMA/CRA website where stakeholders will go to sign and obtain proof of respective CSP signature, as required by approval process Provide best efforts to comply with the PBCS Manual s RCP 240/D and RSP 180/D allocations. Investigate issues where PBCS requirements are not being met, investigate and take feasible corrective action Regional mitigations would be used to mitigate problems that are not considered feasible to correct Administration 14 14

Expected Stakeholders PBCS Charter stakeholder could include: ANSPs using PBCS to support ATM operations in their airspace. Aircraft operators participating in PBCS operations Aircraft equipment suppliers. Aircraft manufacturers. Communication service providers/satellite service providers (CSPs/SSPs) Co-operation among all PBCS stakeholders in achieving all elements of the PBCS manual would be the primary objective Administration 15

Considerations Operators and ANSPs should consider whether they want a more enforceable approach in the event their aircraft data link performance is negatively impacted by CSP/SSP infrastructure The charter will not replace CSP/SSP contracts, and terms of those contracts could include the specified PBCS requirements allocated to CSP/SSPs in renewal efforts Administration 16