Introduction Vision NVTA Jurisdictions In the 21 st century, Northern Virginia will develop and sustain a multimodal transportation system that enhances quality of life and supports economic growth. Investments in the system will provide effective transportation benefits, promote areas of concentrated growth, manage both demand and capacity, and employ the best technology, joining rail, roadway, bus, air, water, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities into an interconnected network that is fiscally sustainable. Town of Purcellville Town of Leesburg Loudoun County Town of Herndon Falls Church Goals Town of Vienna Arlington County 1. Enhance quality of life and economic strength of Northern Virginia through transportation. 2. Enable optimal use of the transportation network and leverage the existing network. Manassas Park Fairfax Alexandria 3. Reduce negative impacts of transportation on communities and the environment. Fairfax County TransAction Timeline Manassas Prince William County Town of Dumfries NOVEMBER 2015 SPRING 2016 FALL 2016 WINTER 2016-17 SUMMER 2017 FALL 2017 TransAction Identify Needs Identify Evaluate Review Adoption by the NVTA Kickoff and Trends Regional Priorities Regional Priorities Draft Plan Public Outreach Public Outreach Public Outreach You Are Here TransAction Overview
NVTA Function TransAction Overview
Performance Based Planning Goal Objective Performance Measure Weight Total person hours of delay 10% Vision Statement Reduce congestion and crowding experienced by travelers in the region Transit crowding 5% Person hours of congested travel in automobiles 5% articulates a preferred idealized state. Person hours of congested travel in transit vehicles 5% Goals focus on priorities and outcomes the region Goal 1: Enhance quality of life and economic strength of Northern Virginia through transportation Improve travel time reliability Increase access to jobs, employees, markets, and destinations Improve connections among and within areas of concentrated growth Congestion severity: maximum travel time ratio 5% Congestion duration 10% Percent of jobs/population within 1/2 mile of high frequency and/or high performance transit Access to jobs within 45 minutes by auto or within 60 minutes by transit Average travel time per motorized trip between Regional Activity Centers Walkable/bikeable environment within Regional Activity Centers 5% 5% 5% 5% desires to move toward. Objectives are measurable and targeted actions that result in incremental but tangible advancement toward the stated goals. Goal 2: Enable optimal use of the transportation network and leverage the existing network Improve the safety of transportation network Increase integration between modes and systems Provide more route and mode options to expand travel choices and improve resiliency of the system Sustain and improve operation of the regional system Safety of the transportation system 5% First and last mile connections 10% Share of travel by non-single-occupancy vehicle modes Person hours of travel caused by 10% increase in PM peak hour demand 10% 5% Performance Measures are used to evaluate potential performance of the transportation network. They derive from the stated objectives. Weights are Goal 3: Reduce negative impacts of transportation on communities and the environment Reduce transportation-related emissions Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by speed 10% applied for each measure to assess overall performance of the plan. TransAction Overview
Today s Travel Conditions 2016 Overall Performance Rating Map 2016 Origin-Destination Commute Travel Patterns Everyone knows that transportation is a major concern in Northern Virginia today. This map highlights some of the existing problems in the region based on the overall weighted performance rating. The analysis highlights areas with more severe issues along all of the major corridors in the region, as shown in darker blue. These locations correspond with areas of concern identified by the public during TransAction s outreach efforts. * ** * Includes trips for the independent cities of Manassas and Manassas Park. ** Includes trips for the independent cities of Fairfax and Falls Church. Average Trip Length for Northern Virginia Commute 14.67 miles Non-Commute 6.25 miles TransAction Overview
Draft Plan Performance 2040 No Build Overall Performance Rating Draft Plan Overall Performance Rating Draft Plan Compared to 2040 No Build - Overall Performance Rating We can t fund everything. The 358 projects identified in the Draft Plan exceed the NVTA s expected funding available through 2040. Other funding sources, including federal, state, local, and private dollars, may be available to help close the gap. More detailed analysis for the NVTA s upcoming Six Year Program will identify a subset of high performing projects for funding. This map shows the overall performance rating for the Northern Virginia region under the 2040 No Build conditions. Areas shown in darker blue perform worse based on this rating, which combines the 15 performance measures. The 2040 No Build includes only projects that are already fully funded. This map shows the overall performance rating for the Northern Virginia Region with the implementation of the 358 projects in the Draft TransAction Plan. As shown, many of the major corridors in Northern Virginia will experience significant improvements in transportation conditions with the implementation of TransAction. This map shows the change in the overalll performance rating resulting from the implementation of the Draft Plan. Areas shown in green are forecast to experience an improvement in transportation conditions with implementation of the Draft Plan, while areas shown in orange are forecast to perform worse than the 2040 No Build. Draft TransAction Plan
Draft Plan Performance Transit Crowding TransAction uses a performance-based planning approach to express policies and goals in quantifiable terms and creates an analytical framework to assess how well different transportation investments meet the TransAction goals. The TransAction performance measures were examined at a fine level of geographic detail for comparisons between conditions in 2040, with and without the Draft Plan. The Draft +14.1% -0.4% Plan will save the Transit Ridership Miles of Travel average Northern -64.4% -23.5% Virginian more than 27 minutes Transit Crowding +9.0% Hours of Travel -43.8% Condition Benefit each day. Transit Mode Share Hours of Delay Improved < > Decreased 2040 No Build Draft Plan Improvement from 2040 No Build Hours of Delay Congestion Severity Condition Condition Benefit Improved < > Decreased Condition Benefit Improved < > Decreased 2040 No Build Draft Plan Improvement from 2040 No Build 2040 No Build Draft Plan Improvement from 2040 No Build Draft TransAction Plan
Benefits of the Plan Northern Virginia is forecast to experience significant population and employment growth by 2040. The Draft Plan would provide significant improvements in transportation conditions as compared with the 2040 No Build baseline. Regional Totals 2016 2040 Change Population 2.41 M 2.99 M 24% Employment 1.36 M 1.87 M 37% Draft Plan Compared to No Build - Job Accessibility Accessibility is an important consideration in the Draft Plan. This map illustrates how the Draft Plan would increase the number of jobs accessible from households in Northern Virginia within 45 minutes by car or 60 minutes by transit. Draft Plan - Northern Virginia Statistics Daily Measures 2016 2040 No Build Draft Plan Change from No Build Transit Boardings 1.0 M 1.4 M 1.6 M 14% increase Person Trips in Motorized Vehicles 8.74 M 10.5 M 10.6 M 1% increase Person-Miles of Travel 105 M 125 M 125 M 0.4% decrease Person-Hours of Travel 3.30 M 5.81 M 4.45 M 24% decrease Person-Hours of Delay 1.01 M 3.03 M 1.70 M 44% decrease Person-Hours of Delay per Capita 0.42 1.01 0.57 44% decrease Service Hours of Crowded Transit 10,800 20,100 7,200 64% decrease No Change Improved Findings
Alternative Future Scenarios Sensitivity Test Scenarios Future Scenarios: Key Variables for Analysis The transportation system is in the midst of profound changes. New technology will provide travelers with more choices. We cannot predict how all of these changes will affect our region in the future, but it is important for a 2040 transportation plan to address the potential magnitude of change that Northern Virginians may experience in their daily travel. Four alternative future scenarios were analyzed as part of the TransAction planning process. The sensitivity analysis shows that the Draft Plan provides significant benefits for each future scenario No Build Performance Under Alternative Future Assumptions Performance of Draft Plan Under Alternative Future Assumptions 2016 2040 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% Person Hours of Delay: 2040 Baseline Compared to 2016 Existing Conditions 34% 36% 38% 40% 42% 44% 46% Person Hours of Delay: Draft Plan Improvement over 2040 No Build 2016 2040 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Transit Crowding: 2040 Baseline Compared to 2016 Existing Conditions 44% 49% 54% 59% 64% 69% 74% 79% Transit Crowding: Draft Plan Improvement over 2040 No Build Current Condition Standard Future Forecast Standard Future Forecast Findings
Key Findings $ Northern Virginia faces unprecedented levels of travel demand, delay, and transit crowding by 2040. No single project, program, or policy will address all of the region s transportation needs. Projected NVTA regional revenues through 2040 would fund less than a quarter of the 358 candidate regional projects in the Draft Plan. Emerging trends in technology and travel preferences may improve travel conditions in 2040. Segments with the highest performance ratings are generally those that include acute travel issues, high volumes, and major candidate regional projects. Segments with the lowest performance ratings generally have less acute travel conditions and/or serve fewer travelers. TransAction Performance by Corridor Segment Segment Description Performance Rating* 8-3 I-395/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg/Blue Yellow Line I-495 to Potomac River 65.8 7-3 I-495 I-95 to Woodrow Wilson Bridge 59.2 6-2 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line Rt. 28 to I-495 58.1 1-4 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line Tysons to US 1 54.7 8-2 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg Prince William County Line to I-495 54.6 6-3 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line I-495 to Potomac River 49.5 8-1 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg Stafford County Line to Fairfax County Line 48.5 10-1 Braddock Road/VRE Manassas Rt. 28 to I-495 45.4 2-1 Loudoun County Parkway/Belmont Ridge Road Rt. 7 to US 50 43.9 11-1 US 50 Fauquier County Line to Fairfax 42.3 3-1 Rt. 28 Rt. 7 to I-66 40.7 6-1 I-66/US 29/VRE Manassas Prince William County Line to Rt. 28 40.5 1-3 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line Rt. 28 to Tysons 39.9 7-1 I-495 American Legion Bridge to I-66 39.6 10-2 Columbia Pike/Braddock Road I-495 to Pentagon 35.8 1-2 Rt. 7/Dulles Greenway Town of Leesburg to Rt. 28 34.5 4-1 Prince William Parkway I-66 to I-95 34.2 7-2 I-495 I-66 to I-395 33.0 5-2 Fairfax County Parkway US 50 to Rolling Road 31.0 5-1 Fairfax County Parkway Rt. 7 to US 50 27.0 5-3 Fairfax County Parkway Rolling Road to US 1 26.4 3-2 Rt. 28 I-66 to Fauquier County Line 24.9 2-3 Rt. 234 I-66 to I-95 21.0 1-1 Rt. 7/Rt. 9 West Virginia state line to Town of Leesburg 15.8 9-2 US 15 Rt. 7 to I-66 13.6 9-1 US 15 Potomac River to Rt. 7 11.8 2-2 North-South Corridor/Bi-County Parkway US 50 to I-66 7.7 9-3 US 15 US 50 to US 29 5.8 *Aggregate of weighted measures applied to the projects associated with each TransAction Corridor Segment Findings
What s in the Draft Plan? TransAction focuses much of its analysis on eleven major travel corridors in Northern Virginia. TransAction: 358 projects Draft Plan Cost: $44.1 billion Draft Plan Elements Loudoun County Falls Church Arlington County $10-13 billion of this cost estimate is associated with project components outside of Northern Virginia, and can only be funded and implemented in partnership with neighboring jurisdictions Fairfax Corridor Corridor Name Roadway Transit ITS/ ICM 1 Non- Motorized 2 1 Route 7/Dulles Toll Road/Route 9/Silver Line 97 66 11 32 3 TDM3 2 Loudoun County Parkway/ Bi-County Parkway/Route 234 76 21 9 2 1 3 Route 28 54 20 7 3 1 Manassas Park Fairfax 4 Prince William Parkway 26 14 8 0 1 Manassas Prince William County County Alexandria 5 Fairfax County Parkway 29 32 9 6 1 6 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange-Silver Line/VRE Manassas 73 59 10 36 3 7 I-495 32 47 13 14 1 8 I-95/I-395/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg/Blue-Yellow Line 48 55 14 19 3 TransAction Corridor 9 US 15 32 6 3 1 1 1. Route 7/Dulles Toll Road/Route 9/Silver Line 2. Loudoun County Parkway/Bi-County Parkway/Route 234 3. Route 28 4. Prince William Parkway 5. Fairfax County Parkway 6. I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange-Silver Line/VRE Manassas 7. I-495 8. I-95/I-395/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg/Blue-Yellow Line 9. US 15 10. Columbia Pike/Braddock Road/VRE Manassas 11. US 50 10 Columbia Pike/Braddock Road/ VRE Manassas 38 59 14 25 3 11 US 50 27 23 3 10 1 Note: The Project List has projects with multiple transportation modes and within multiple TransAction corridors. 1 Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) include technologies to communicate and improve regional travel. Integrated corridor management (ICM) defines the practice of coordinating travel along different roadways within a major travel corridor. 2 Non-motorized includes bicycle and pedestrian projects that address key connectivity in the region. 3 Travel Demand Management (TDM) is a set of services designed to provide commuters with alternative options to driving alone. The Draft TransAction Plan includes a regional approach to TDM. TransAction Projects
Draft TransAction Plan Projects RAIL IMPROVEMENTS HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 340 108 67 104 100 32 104 108 116, 299, 356 1 48 63 97 71 202 115, 301, 326, 344 65 79 66 90, 115, 324, 325, 343 308 11 11 106 350 89 81 286 9 306 323 287 164 172 305 11 167 304 Existing Metroway BRT Proposed Metrorail Blue Line Extension to Potomac Mills Proposed LRT Proposed Metrorail Orange Line Extension to Centreville Proposed BRT LRT - Light Rail Transit BRT - Bus Rapid Transit NOTE: Projects in the inset are not shown in the main map 190 Proposed Metrorail Blue Line Core Realignment NOTE: Projects in the inset are shown in the main map 93 345 130 302 192 303 129 128 180 185 309 16 157 155 162 10 153 234 184 17 182 148 307 Loudoun County 24 174 152 151 179 144 289 163 186 7 158 120 149 181 175 150 144 188 183 143 176 187 314 191 147 165 156 131 166 18 23 267 189 159 50 332 12 69 228 168 338 20 154 178 37 171 173 311 160 119 67 193 233 346 15 145 146 161 121 10 21 123 212 8 27 310 5 225 6 29 BUS SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Fairfax County 92 177 32 109 245 254 52 249 9 54, 132 45 315 352 127 105 45 292 142 200 252 247 250 260 255 239 214 235 277 298 199 30 258 110 248 276 25 297 210 26 333 335 125 294 203 63 Arlington 19 47 57 51 117 49 101 319 84 85 76 318 79 68 22 196 7 98 Alexandria 194 293 317 76 122 395 244 336 296 82 97 355 80 110 27 4 65 295 349 53 196 83 78 353 236 78 76 300 78 227 66 70 42 354 64 40 Manassas Park 41 1 73 224 38 229 77 223 89 286 124 Manassas 74 213 285 284 316 75 264 Prince William County ITS/ICM CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS AND TDM FOCUS AREAS 58 334 Fairfax 278 263 50 236 218 320 297 NOTE: Projects in the inset are not shown in the main map 134 118 49 46 94 279 34 334 495 71 140 59 290 49 261 269 114 Falls Church 350 55 123 330 358 273 221 242 44 43 328 238 266 28 137 136 95 106 3 2 337 240 220 253 28 36 267 272 127 331 31 351 55 329 96 216 230 109 139 29 14, 313 315 141 48 268 120 1 215 33 309 107 66 135 357 312 14, 313 198 126 56 232 205 99 170 226 109 348 222 208 197 206 209 15 169 207 204 219 231 347 211 39 283 259 243 270 322 271 281 217 95 35 280 61, 62, 340 282 244 327 81 243 340 103, 340 262 241 234 291 61, 62, 340 257 287 256 274 62, 340 61, 62, 340 251 BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS 113, 193, 340 ITS/ICM Projects 111 Arlington Alexandria 275 321 91, 339, 340 Springfield 0 87 6 Miles 237 138 60 288 112 72 Fairfax - I-66 Fairfax - Route 1 Fairfax - Falls Church 86 Herndon - Reston 195 333 Rosslyn - Ballston 86 Eastern Prince William Western Prince William Eastern Loudoun - Leesburg 3 88 91, 340 340 246 265 133 TDM Focus Areas (Project # 341) Tysons 342 NOTE: Projects in the inset are not shown in the main map NOTE: Projects in the inset are not shown in the main map TransAction Projects ITS - Intelligent Transportation Systems ITS - Intelligent Transportation Systems ICM - Integrated Corridor Management ICM - Integrated Corridor Management TDM Travel Demand Management TDM - Travel Demand Management 95 50 28 NVTA TransAction Project Metrorail Station TransAction Project ID Metrorail Highway Symbols VRE Station Jurisdiction Boundary VRE Line
What Happens Next? Once adopted as Northern Virginia s long range transportation plan, the NVTA can use TransAction to develop a Six Year Program, providing regional funds to implement transportation improvement projects across the region. Public Adopt Six Year Implement Comment TransAction Program Projects At key decision points, the NVTA will: Use TransAction to Develop the Six Year Program. Define needs consistent with regional priorities and geographies. Work across jurisdictional boundaries to address transportation needs. Work with jurisdictions and stakeholders on near term approaches such as: New, improved, and expanded transit services; New regional TDM strategies that complement existing programs; New and existing technology systems; Completion of ongoing roadway and multimodal projects. Emphasize the importance of maximizing use of additional funding sources. Assure that each project improves mobility for all applicable modes and users. Monitor Emerging Trends. Monitor emerging trends and report significant changes on an annual basis. Consider additional analysis to identify projects that complement emerging trends Explore proactive policy guidance associated with beneficial elements of emerging trends, such as: Public education regarding new transportation technologies; Integration of human-driven and Connected/Autonomous Vehicles in different geographies across the region; Development of complementary transit and shared mobility services. Next Steps