The environment surrounding Gipsy Lane FPG level crossing consists of town or village etc on one side of the line.

Similar documents
There are no planned or apparent developments near the crossing which may lead to a change or increase in use or risk.

2.2 USER CENSUS DATA A site census estimated on 19/01/2016, together with Sky high 9 day census March 2014.

Harts Drove UWCM level crossing provides Access to worksite / leisure area from facility.

Felixstowe Branch Line FAQ

Thank you for your of 1st June You requested the following information:

Appendix A: Summary of findings drawn from an analysis of responses to the questionnaire issued to all households in Trimley St Martin

Transport Assessment Appendix M: Avonmouth Impacts

TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 THE TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 THE NETWORK RAIL (SUFFOLK LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER

The Network Rail (Suffolk Level Crossing Reduction) Order

Level Crossings Configuration Standards

THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (ESSEX AND OTHERS LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT REFERENCE: TWA/17/APP/05

Report to: Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly 18 January A10 Foxton level crossing bypass and travel hub

Passive Level Crossings. Crossings where users are in control of their actions

20mph Speed Limit Zones

Level Crossings Design and Installation

2 Tripod System User Guide

Planning Committee. Thursday, 26 May 2016

Chapter 4 Route Window NE3 Manor Park station. Transport for London

Road Signs, Markings and Their Meaning

Middlesbrough Football Club Access Statement 2018/19

History of Vauxhall Bridge

Document Control Identification. Document History. Authorisation. Rail Safety Manager Brookfield Rail

GK/GN0692. Guidance on Level Crossing Interface Requirements. Rail Industry Guidance Note for GK/RT0192. Published by

The case for a local rail station. At Great Blakenham, Suffolk.

Railway Level Crossings. Keeping you Safe! Information Pack

A63 Castle Street, Hull HullBID Network Lunch 24 August 2017

Chapter 25 Route Window SE6 Plumstead portal. Transport for London

All queries and paragraph references, as set out in red below, relate to Mark Brunnen s Proof of Evidence (NR27/1).

Railfuture East Anglia Whittlesford Parkway station audit

SOUTH INTERCHANGE AREA

BHS ADVICE ON Dimensions of Width, Area and Height

Appendix 6 Fulbourn Greenway Review

Airdrie - Bathgate Railway and Linked Improvements Bill. Environmental Statement Page 1

Requirements for Level Crossings

Speed control humps - Scotland, England and Wales

Chapter 8 Route Window NE7 Chadwell Heath station. Transport for London

Chapter 4 Route window W23 Taplow station. Transport for London

Chapter 12 Route window W15 Dog Kennel bridge. Transport for London

Level Crossing Interface Requirements

Provincial Railway Technical Standards

IOW Ramblers Submission Paper to the Sept 2016 ROW Improvement Plan Consultation.

STIRLING TO KINCARDINE RE-OPENING OF LINE

Suffolk Local Access Forum s (SLAF) response to Network Rail s consultation on level crossing closures.

Threats to possible orbital light-rail in outer London from the current Brent Cross planning application...

The Bus Services Bill and Municipal Bus Companies

Policy Railway crossings

The impact of investments & storms on the economic benefits provided by the South West Coast Path National Trail to the region between 2010 and 2014

Aerial Photography and Flight Planning

FAQS and Code of Conduct for use under the Tamar Trails heading on the Tamar Valley AONB and Tamar Trails websites: Tamar Trails FAQs

Level Crossing Risk Assessment Polegate MCB

PUBLIC INQUIRY APPLICATION BY NEWTWORK RAIL UNDER TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL SUFFOLK LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION ORDER

Welcome to the Illinois High-Speed Rail Chicago to St. Louis Construction Update Meeting. Today s meeting will provide an overview of the Program,

Aspen Skiing Company Policy for Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices And Service Animals

Quiet Zone Process. Background:

Calgary River Access Strategy Priority Sites and Proposed Funding

PLANNING STATEMENT FORMER HSBC BANK, 18 HIGH STREET, AMESBURY

Green Fields Leppington

Better Towpaths for Everyone. A national policy for sharing towpaths

YOU! Kensal Town Towpath Public Consultation WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU COULD WIN. Friday 21st December 2012 & Friday 8th February 2013

Railroad Safety in the United States. Ian Savage

Chapter 6 Route Window NE5 Seven Kings station. Transport for London

Local public consultation

A120 BRAINTREE TO A12 Consultation on Route Options. 17 January 14 March 2017

Chicago St. Louis High-Speed Rail. Braidwood Construction. Local Officials Briefing August 7, 2014

Snowmobile Trail Signing REF: DNR Trail Signing Handbook

Prince Albert Road Towpath Ramp, Camden Feasibility Report

Bus Priority Package. Presentation to Leigh Business Forum. 11 December 2015

Details of individual in organisation

Seek the Board s approval for the Donald Place kerb and channel renewal to progress to final design, tender and construction; and

Cabinet. The Future of Wareham Foot Level Crossing. Date of Meeting 24 February 2016

Abbey Chesterton bridge Questions & Answers

HIGHWAY RAIL GRADE CROSSING CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM

Chapter 13 Route Window NE12 Harold Wood station. Transport for London

Lower Thames Crossing consultation response

Chapter 14 Route Window C12 Mile End Park and Eleanor Street shafts. Transport for London

Progress and strategy. Derek Rees, CLOCS Project Director

Appendix 9 Melbourn Greenway Review

ACCESS STATEMENT FOR QUEENS HEAD

Chapter 2 Route window W25 Maidenhead station. Transport for London

Otorohanga Stopbank Pathway - Project Overview

ADVICE ON Cattle Grids

Figure 1: Little Dry Creek Trail Crossing

London Borough of Barnet Traffic & Development Design Team

Welcome Consultation Meeting for the Development of the Railway-Roadway Grade Crossings Regulations. May and June, 2012

DEVON AND CORNWALL. The November 2012 Railway Flooding in Devon: Observations & Recommendations

Roundhouse Way Transport Interchange (Part of NATS City Centre Package)

Saighton Camp, Chester. Technical Note: Impact of Boughton Heath S278 Works upon the operation of the Local Highway Network

A TRANSPORT SYSTEM CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Accessibility Statement for The Strathspey Railway

Future Economy. Future Econo. Conditions for Growth. Conditions for Growth. Growth for Business. Growth for Business. Isles of Scilly.

ASLEF Response to Welsh Affairs Select Committee Inquiry Provision of Cross- Border Services for Wales October 2008

Update on the Thameslink programme

Slad over to Pitchcombe and back

ATTACHMENT A. P a g e 6 I t e m #

CONSULTATION ON ISSUES AFFECTING PASSENGERS ACCESS TO UK AIRPORTS A REVIEW OF SURFACE ACCESS. Response by Newcastle International Airport Ltd

A31 Ringwood improvement scheme

Railway-Highway Crossing at Grade Regulations: Guidelines for British Columbia s Provincial Heritage Railways

WELCOME TO PROJECT EVERGREEN 3 CHILTERN S PROPOSED NEW OXFORD TO LONDON ROUTE

Submitted to: NYX CAPITAL CORP. 1131a Leslie Street, Suite 201 Toronto, Ontario M3C 3L8 Attention: Mr. Tim Jessop Development Manager

Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy

Transcription:

1.3 ENVIRONMENT Up side crossing approach Down side crossing approach The environment surrounding Gipsy Lane FPG level crossing consists of town or village etc on one side of the line. It is a public footpath level crossing which is located on Gipsy Lane. There are no stations visible at the level crossing. At Gipsy Lane FPG level crossing the orientation of the road/path from the north is 130 ; the orientation of the railway from the north to the up line in the up direction is 50. Low horizon can result in sun glare; sun glare is a known issue. There are no planned or apparent developments near the crossing which may lead to a change or increase in use or risk. Site visit general observations: Network Rails has not been consulted on and is not aware of any planned or ongoing developments. 2. LEVEL CROSSING USAGE 2.1 RAIL The train service over Gipsy Lane FPG level crossing consists of passenger and freight trains. There are 198 trains per day. The highest permissible line speed of trains is 100mph. Trains are timetabled to run for 24 hours per day. Assessor s notes: Large number of both high speed passenger, slower passenger and freight stock passes over the crossing. The differential speeds mean warning times are varied. 2.2 USER CENSUS DATA A 24 hour census was carried out on 23/03/2015 by the year.. The census applies to 100% of The census taken on the day is as follows: Pedestrians 47 Pedal cyclists 2 Horses / riders 0 Animals on the hoof 0 Available information indicates that the crossing has a high proportion of vulnerable users. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Registered Office Kings Place, York Way, London N1 9AG Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www networkrail co uk Passive Level Crossing Risk Assessment Template v1.0 [July 2014] Page 2 of 16

b. benefit to cost ratio is between 0.99 and 0.5: reasonable safety and business benefit established where costs are not grossly disproportionate against the safety benefit; and c. benefit to cost ratio is between 0.49 and 0.0: weak safety and business benefit established. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Registered Office Kings Place, York Way, London N1 9AG Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www networkrail co uk Passive Level Crossing Risk Assessment Template v1.0 [July 2014] Page 8 of 16

5.2 CONCLUSIONS Assessor s notes: Gipsy Lane FPG is a pedestrian crossing located in between Stowmarket and Needham Market. It is on the London to Norwich main line approximately 1100metres south of Needham Market Station. Access to the crossing is via wicket gates which open away from the railway and are positioned 2m from the nearest rails. The crossing has tarmac approaches leading to the rubber Holdfast deck which are boarded by timber anti-trespass guards. The approaches have slight inclines up to the track level. The train service is frequent with a broad variety of trains passing the crossing each day. They include passenger and freight trains or various lengths and types and also differing speeds. Due to the large number of trains passing over this crossing, there is a significant possibility of two trains passing over the crossing and one blocking the view of the second train approaching on the other line. Sighting of Down direction approaching trains is insufficient for users to cross due to the sharp track curvature and 3 rd party vegetation. This is currently mitigated via a temporary speed restriction (TSR) of 50mph which gives a user suitable time to cross. Sighting of Up direction trains is far better as the line is straight, meaning trains are visible at just over 600metres. The census shows an above average number of users for the type and location of crossing and this may be due to the locals not wishing to have the crossing closed following the public meeting and thus increasing the usage. Once the census camera had been spotted, many users made multiple trips back and forth within a short time period. The majority of users were seen to be around retirement age and so considered as vulnerable meaning the traverse time has been increased to compensate. No night time usage was recorded. Options to mitigate against the reduced sighting and to lower or remove the risks associated are as follows:- Miniature Stop Lights or MSLs would give improved warnings of approaching trains, however due to the proximity of Needham Market Station warning times would be increased as users would be waiting while a train stops at the station. This would increase to possibility of users crossing on a red light as they believe they have time before the train arrives at the crossing. This option has been dismissed at this time. A footbridge would remove the crossing, but the location next to residential properties makes this an unpopular option and it is not cost effective. This is part of an ongoing public consultation and design An underpass would remove the crossing but there are engineering restrictions due to the risk of flooding and steep approaches. This is part of an on-going public consultation and design Permanent speed restriction - the current TSR of 50mph is slowing down the passenger service considerably and as there are current government aspirations to increase the line speed between London and Norwich, this is not considered as a permanent mitigation. The crossing is currently in a suitable and sufficient state for its users but is reliant on a speed restriction (with the additional warning via whistle boards) to achieve compliant warnings of approaching trains. Sufficient sighting will never be fully achieved due to the London side curve with vegetation on third party land, and Miniature Stop Lights cannot be installed due to the proximity of the Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Registered Office Kings Place, York Way, London N1 9AG Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www networkrail co uk Passive Level Crossing Risk Assessment Template v1.0 [July 2014] Page 9 of 16

station at Needham Market. Therefore, the only options available are closure with diversion, either to a footbridge or underpass, both of which are currently the focus of engineering development along with public consultation. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Registered Office Kings Place, York Way, London N1 9AG Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www networkrail co uk Passive Level Crossing Risk Assessment Template v1.0 [July 2014] Page 10 of 16

ANNEX A ADDITIONAL PHOTOGRAPHS DSAC - Down side across crossing USAC Up side across crossing DSDDTA Down side down direction train approach DSUDTA Down side up direction train approach USUDTA Up side up direction train approach UDDDTA Up side down direction train approach Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd Registered Office Kings Place, York Way, London N1 9AG Registered in England and Wales No. 2904587 www networkrail co uk Passive Level Crossing Risk Assessment Template v1.0 [July 2014] Page 11 of 16