ADR In the Aviation Sector and the Sector of Tour Operators

Similar documents
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CANCELLATION AND LONG DELAY UNDER EU REGULATION 261/2004

The European Commission's Proposal to Amend EU Regulation 261/2004. by Arpad Szakal

Air Passengers Rights

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 12 May 2011 (*)

CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENT SECTION 3 AIR TRANSPORT SERIES X PART I 1 June, 2008 Effective : FORTHWITH

EU Air Passenger Rights

PEOPIL & McGILL CONFERENCE

Consumer Protection Workshop. Brasilia, 25 August 2016

Suggestions for a Revision of Reg 261/2004 Michael Wukoschitz, Austria

Regulation 261/2004 denied boarding, cancellation and delay. Italian experience

Passenger Rights. Air passengers have specific consumer rights under European law. EU Regulation 261/2004 provides protection when:

Air Passenger Rights Revision - Frequently Asked Questions

Trains, planes, cars and boats. What you should know

Maritime Passenger Rights

Facilities to be provided to passengers by airlines due to denied boarding, cancellation of flights and delays in flights.

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

Passenger Rights. Air passengers have specific consumer rights under European law. EU Regulation 261/2004 provides protection when:

Regulations and Contracts

Official Journal of the European Union L 46/1. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Summary of stakeholder consultation on the possible revision of Regulation 261/2004

5 th of September 2013 No 6-25/ PRECEPT No 6-25/

A Europe for all passengers

Functioning and application of established rights of people travelling by air

Summary of the rights of passengers travelling by bus and coach 1

APRA RECCOMENDATIONS ON

ECC-Net involvement in Air Passenger Rights. Bianca Schulz, ECC France Stakeholder conference on Air Passenger Rights, Brussels, 30 May 2012

NEW CASES IN THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON AIR PASSENGER RIGHTS

P7_TA(2014)0092 Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights ***I

Your essential guide to air travel

NO COMPENSATION PAYMENTS PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EC) No. 261/2004 IN CASE OF STRIKES?

Changes in passenger rights

Report on Air Passenger Rights Complaints for the period 1 st January to 30 th June th December 2011

7615/13 GL/ne 1 DG E 2 A

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

European Consumer Centres Network TOURISM IN THE HUNGARY. Travelling by plane

Air Carrier E-surance (ACE) Design of Insurance for Airline EC-261 Claims

LJN: BN2126,Subdistrict section Court in Haarlem, / CV EXPL

Passenger Rights Complaints in 2015

Report on Passenger Rights Complaints for year ended 31 st December th December 2011

IATA LEGAL SYMPOSIUM February 2011 Vancouver, Canada. EU Passenger Rights Update

9820/1/14 REV 1 GL/kl 1 DGE 2 A

GHANA CIVIL AVIATION (ECONOMIC)

PROPOSED REGULATION OF JCAR CONSUMER PROTECTION

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Eighth Chamber) 7 September 2017 (*)

ECC-Net Air Passenger Rights Report 2015

AIR PASSENGER RIGHTS EU COMPLAINT FORM

Passenger rights: what passengers with reduced mobility need to know when travelling by air

Bas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman v Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-302/16)

Your Rights. Our Mission.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 4 May 2017 *

Aviation Law. Michael J. Holland. Condon & Forsyth LLP -- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 4 May 2017 (*)

VOLCANIC ASH AN ASSESSMENT OF EC REGULATION 261/2004 AS THE DUST SETTLES

InfoCuria Case law of the Court of Justice English (en) Home > Search form > List of results > Documents. Language of document : English

Corina van der Lans v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (Case C-257/14)

The Liability Aspects of the Volcanic Eruption on Iceland

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 10 July 2008

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

REVISION OF REG. 1371/2007 ON RAIL PASSENGERS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS: THE POSITION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATORS AND ORGANISING AUTHORITIES

Interpretation of Force Majeure

Customer Service Plan

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 24

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

operator's guide to passenger rights for regular services longer than 250km

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

PLEASE NOTE THIS DOCUMENT IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF THE LAW.

Brussels, C(2016) 3502 final COMMISSION NOTICE

Implementation at National level. Laura Fiumara Gent, 4 July 2018

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

Airports and Airlines Winter Operations Economic Policy Aspects. Narjess Teyssier Chief Economic Analysis & Policy Section

AIR NAVIGATION ORDER

General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) Customer Protection Rights Regulation

Audit brief. Passenger rights in the EU

luxaviation S.A. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESS

Unfair terms in air transport contracts

IN THE PORTSMOUTH COUNTY COURT. Before: DEPUTY DISTRICT JUDGE ALEXANDRE. - and -

AFRICAN AIR TRANSPORT AND THE PROTECTON OF THE CONSUMER

AMENDMENTS EN United in diversity EN 2013/0072(COD) Draft report Georges Bach (PE v02-00)

European Economic and Social Committee OPINION

Article 3 Scope Article 4 Flight delays

The Regulation Works! An analysis of the Impact Assessment On Proposal for the Amendment of Regulation 261/2004 on Air Passengers Rights

CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS BUCKS COUNTY WOMEN S CHORUS HELSINKI, TALLINN & STOCKHOLM

Annual Report. 1. The number of domestic disputes and cross-border disputes the ADR entity has received:

Briefing: Your Consumer Rights

ACI EUROPE POSITION. A level playing field for European airports the need for revised guidelines on State Aid

Court File No.: T e- document T FEDERAL COURT COUR FEDERALE

Major Rights of an Air Passenger

Advice for brokers about the ATOL Regulations and the ATOL scheme

COUNCIL 215TH SESSION

Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA (Case C-537/17)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 May 2014 (OR. en) 9820/14 ADD 1 REV 1. Interinstitutional File: 2013/0072 (COD)

Report on Air Passenger Rights Complaints for the period 1 st January to 30 th June th October 2009

Terms and conditions International routes

CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS SECOND BAPTIST SCHOOL VISION CHOIR PRAGUE, VIENNA, SALZBURG & MUNICH

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 19 November 2009 (*)

Dear Sirs at the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA),

FINLAND, ESTONIA & LATVIA

CONFIRMATION OF ARRANGEMENTS BAY AREA CHORUS IRELAND

AVIA INVEST LLC. The Airlines Attraction Policy

7615/13 ADD 2 GL/ne 1 DG E 2 A

Transcription:

ADR In the Aviation Sector and the Sector of Tour Operators

Mia Wouters LVP Law Advocaat Attorney at Law Professor, University of Ghent AIR PASSENGER RIGHTS OR WRONGS?

AIA, Brussels June 24 th, 2011 Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Aviation Sector and the Sector of Tour Operators AIR PASSENGER RIGHTS OR WRONGS? Mia Wouters LVP Law Advocaat Attorney at Law Professor, University of Ghent Vossendreef 6 B1 B 1180 Brussels, Belgium mia.wouters@lvplaw.be

Regulation 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on the common rules for operation of air services in the Community Air carriers operating from a community airport must: indicate at the onset the final amount of the ticket i.e. price first advertised on the website should be the final amount the consumer has to pay

In addition: Regulation 1008/2008 Consumer should be given breakdown of the price elements: (a) basic fare (b) the taxes (c) airport charges Both (b) and (c) on a per passenger basis and directly traceble to third parties (airports, governments) (d) other charges by airlines themselves ( f.i. Security fees other then under (c), war premium, environmental taxes,..)

Regulation n 1008/2008 Optional price supplements f.i. Luggage, cancellation insurance, use of credit cards must be communicated: in a clear and transparent way at the start of the booking process acceptance on an opt-in basis

Regulation 80/2009 of January 14, 2009 on a Code Of Conduct for Computer Reservation Systems Obligation to display «all-inclusive» prices => Airfares must include all applicable taxes, charges and fees Flights involving stops on route must be defined Actual operator of the flight must clearly be defined Flights operated by carriers that are on the blacklist (Reg. 211/2005) must specifically be identified

Regulation 1107/2006 of July 5 th, 2006 concerning Passengers with Reduced Mobility (PRMs) Intent: Tries to ensure that passengers with reduced mobility have the same opportunities as other citizens to travel by air Applies to ALL airlines operating in the European Union Covers 3 areas: 1. Fair and non-discriminatory treatment of people with reduced mobility 2. Free of charge assistance in all airports located in the EU and the setting up of quality standards 3. And on-board assistance It foresees a right of reimbursement and re-routing in case of denied boarding It puts airlines and the tour operators under an obligation to publish their policy towards passengers with reduced mobility

Directive on Package Travel 90/314 of June 13 th, 1990 New proposal expected during second half of 2011

Unfair business-to-consumer Commercial Practices Directive (UCP) Directive 2005/ 29 EC amending of May 11 th, 2005 Judgment of the Court of 12 May 2011 Konsumentenombudsmannen v. Ving Sverige - entry-level price

Regulation 211/2005 of December 14 th, 2006 on Carriers with an Operating Ban I. Publication of a community list of carriers which are banned II. Inform passengers of the identity of the operating carrier: Upon reservation or At the latest at the time of check-in if the operating carrier was not known beforehand or if it was changed in the meantime In case the operating carrier appears on the black list. Passenger has the right : to be re-booked or if only advised at the last minute to be reimbursed for the full cost of the ticket to be re-routed to his final destination at the earliest opportunity

Regulation 261/2004 of February 11 th, 2004 on compensation and assistance in the event of denied boarding, cancellation or long delays. Overbooking = normal business practice Regulation 295/91 of February 4 th, 1991 establishing common rules for denied boarding compensation Financial compensation in case of denied boarding of 150 or 300 euros, but cannot exceed what the passenger paid for the ticket

Regulation 261/2004 2000: campaining by the Commission to make passengers aware of their rights (posters in community airports) 2001: denied boarding still too high so the Commission posted a new proposal Regulation 261/2004 came into force on February 16th, 2005!

Regulation 261/2004 Application to all passengers, Departing from a community airport Arriving from a third country on a community carrier Provided that passengers, Have a confirmed reservation Present themselves for check-in at the time indicated or at least 45 minutes before departure Does not apply to passengers, Travelling free of charge (except FFP) At reduced rates not available to the public APPLIES ONLY TO THE OPERATING CARRIER!

Regulation 261/2004 Regulates: 1. Denied boarding art. 4 2. Cancellations art. 5 3. Delays art. 6 3 possible remedies: Article 7 - right of compensation Artilce 8 - reimbursement or re-routing Article 9 - assistance

Regulation 261/2004 Article 7 - right of compensation Amount to be paid: 250 euro for flights of less than 1500 km 400 euro for flights between 1500 3500 km 600 euro for flights over 3500 km Amount to be reduced by 50 % in case of, re-routing and, if arrival time does not exceed 2 hours/ 3 hours/ 4 hours

Regulation 261/2004 Article 8 - reimbursement or re-routing Passenger has the right to ask for: reimbursement of the ticket a return flight re-routing

Regulation 261/2004 Article 9 assistance The passenger shall be offered free of charge: Meals and refreshments Hotel accomodation if necessary Transport between airport and hotel Two telephone calls, telex, fax or emails

DENIED BOARDING call for volunteers Article 8 against your will Articles 7 + 8 + 9 Regulation 261/2004 CANCELLATION Article 8 + Article 9 + Article 7 UNLESS passengers are: Informed 2 weeks before departure Informed between 2 weeks and 7 days before departure and re-routed to depart no more than 2 hours earlier and to arrive no more than 4 hours after scheduled arrival Informed less than 7 days before departure and rerouted to depart no more than 1 hour earlier and to arrive no more then 2 hours later DELAY of at least 2 hours flights of 1500 km 3 hours flights between 1500-3500 km 4 hours flights for more than 3500 km Article 9 5 hours Article 9 + 8

Regulation 261/2004 Regulation 261/2004 = REGULATION Directly applicable in Member States National Courts National enforcement bodies article 16

CASE LAW OF ECJ IATA and ELFAA v. Department of Transport C-344/04, October 1st, 2006 Question: Is Reg. 261/2004 consistent with Article 19 (delay) of the Montreal Convention? Montreal Convention: defense if carrier proves that it took all necessary measures Court of Justice: Delay causes 2 types of damage: (1) damage identical to all passengers (2) individual damage Montreal deals with damages by way of redress Regulation deals with standardized and immediate compensatory measures. Regulation works at an earlier stage (before the flight)

Wallentin Hermann v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane Case C-549/07; December 22 nd, 2008 Question: cancellation: interpretation of extraordinary circumstances are technical problems extraordinary circumstances Case Law of ECJ Court: extraordinary = event which is not inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier and is beyond its control In light of the degree of sophistication of aircraft, technical problems which come to light during maintenance of aircraft or on account of failure to carry out such maintenance are not extraordinary circumstances burden of proof is on the carrier. Even if he had used all the resources and financial means at his disposal, he clearly would not have been able to prevent the extraordinary circumstances, unless he had made intolerable sacrifices

Sturgeon v. Candor (Bock v. Air France) Case C-402/07 & C-432/07 November 19th, 2009 Case Law of ECJ Preliminary question on the difference between delay and cancellation. Court reformulated the question and posed a second question «whether passengers whose fligths are delayed may for the purpose of the application of the right to compensation be treated as passengers whose flights are cancelled» Passengers whose fligths are delayed suffer the same type of damage as those whose flights are canceled. Similar inconvenience and frustation. Equal treatment => compensation is due Court decided: 3 hours of delay equals cancellation. Court declared passenger rights far beyond the wording of the Regulation

Case Law of ECJ Eglitis & Ratnieks v. Latvijas Republikas Ekonomikas Ministrija & Air Baltic Corporation AS (intervening party) Case C-294/10; May 12 th, 2011 Question: Whether the carriers are under an obligation to organize their resources so to provide a minimum reserve time after the scheduled departure and be able to operate the flight after extraordinary circumstances have come to an end. Court: we cannot answer this in general and without distinction. The question if all reasonable measures were taken to provide for a minimum reserve time, cannot be resolved in the same way for all carriers in all situations when extraordinary circumstances arise. The ability of a carrier to operate the flight in face of extraordinary circumstances must be carried out in a way that does not result in the carrier making intolerable sacrifices

Volcanic Ash Cloud 14 April 2010: eruption of Eyjafjallajökull 15 April 21 April: Air space was closed and thousands of passengers were stranded Considered as an extraordinary event no compensation is due (Article 7) BUT duty of care and assistance (Article 9) and duty to re-route stays! (Article 8)

Shortcomings as defined by the industry: Airlines believe they are excessively affected Compensation does not bear a relation to the ticket price No transparency, no guidance on delay versus cancellation What about connecting flights Overlapping with foreign consumer protection measures

Shortcomings? Delay and cancellations: Multiple causes and only a few are under the legal or practical control of the carriers Revision of rules in case of crisis (such as cabin crew strikes, volcanic ash clouds, air trafic control strikes) Need for benchmark standard of behaviour Need to be brought in line with passenger rights in rail Reg. 1371/2007; maritime and inland waterways Reg. 1177/2010, as well as for bus and coaches Reg 181/2011

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU!