Panama City Beach CVB Travel Market Visitor Profile & Economic Impact Report

Similar documents
Panama City Beach Travel Market Economic Impact Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Panama City Beach CVB Travel Market Preliminary Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

Panama City Beach CVB Visitor Profile & Economic Impact Report. Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau

2013 Visitor Profile & Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Chattanooga & Hamilton Co. Tourism Trends & Economic Outlook

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

Visit Tallahassee. Economic Impact of Tourism Report Fiscal Year 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas

April 2012 Visitor Profile

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Galveston Island, Texas Analysis

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts p

2005 COLLIER COUNTY HIGH SEASON VISITOR PROFILE

Securing Tourism s Place at the Local Economic Development Table. Steve Morse, Ph.D. Director & Economist Tourism Institute Sept.

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

The Economic Impact of Travel in Minnesota Analysis

Produced by: Destination Research Sergi Jarques, Director

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

Visit South Walton Visitor Tracking Study: Summer Phillip Downs, Ph.D. Joseph St. Germain, Ph.D. Rachael Anglin Downs & St.

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

March 2012 Visitor Profile

INTERNATIONAL DRIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Luis Nieves-Ruiz, AICP Economic Development Program Manager March 29, 2017

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

COLLIER COUNTY 2004 WINTER VISITOR PROFILE

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Canterbury Results. Produced by: Destination Research

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

Commissioned by: Economic Impact of Tourism. Stevenage Results. Produced by: Destination Research

Annual Report Collier s Hospitality &Tourism Industry

Economic Impact of Tourism. Hertfordshire Results. Commissioned by: Visit Herts. Produced by:

June 2009 Visitor Profile

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2013 Visitor Profile

Maury County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Maury County (Columbia and Spring Hill area)

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

November 2011 Visitor Profile

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

Visitor Profile Alabama Gulf Coast Convention & Visitors Bureau

Wyoming Travel Impacts

The Economic Impact of Poole s Visitor Economy 2015

The Travel & Tourism Industry in Vermont

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Loudon County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, Loudon County (Loudon and Lenoir City areas)

October 2011 Visitor Profile

Wyoming Travel Impacts

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

The Economic Impact of Gloucestershire s Visitor Economy Forest of Dean district

Florida s Paradise Coast. Leading the Way to Prosperity

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

The Economic Impact of Tourism on the District of Thanet 2011

West Somerset 2015 Local data version

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM. Raleigh, North Carolina

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Florida Department of Transportation Analysis of Scheduled Air Service in Florida

The 2001 Economic Impact of Connecticut s Travel and Tourism Industry

April 2011 Visitor Profile

Cheatham County, TN. Hotel, Restaurant, and Travel Industries: Economic Profile and Business Trends, 2006

March 2011 Visitor Profile

ECONOMIC PROFILE. Tourism

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Calderdale Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Data Digest: Florida. August 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

OVERVIEW. Currently South Australia contributes $6.3 billion to the Australian tourism economy.

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Walworth County, Wisconsin. July 2013

Report on Palm Beach County Tourism Fiscal Year 2007/2008 (October 2007 September 2008)

Tourism Statistics

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

REPORT ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM. Raleigh, North Carolina

How does my local economy function? What would the economic consequences of a project or action be?

Herb Malone, Jr. President/CEO. Alabama Gulf Coast CVB

Commissioned by: Visit Kent. Economic Impact of Tourism. Dover Results. Produced by: Destination Research

The Economic Impact of Tourism Eastbourne Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau April 2014 Visitor Profile

~~~ 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -RSW

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau January 2013 Visitor Profile

September 2016 Visitor Profile

St. Petersburg/Clearwater Area Convention and Visitors Bureau. September 2006 Visitor Profile

State of the Shared Vacation Ownership Industry. ARDA International Foundation (AIF)

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

The Economic Impact of the 2015 ASICS Los Angeles Marathon. September 2015

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau February 2013 Visitor Profile

Visitor Profile and Economic Impact Study

THE ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF TOURISM AND NATURE TOURISM IN CORPUS CHRISTI 2012 UPDATE

Tourism Statistics RTO 1

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau November 2012 Visitor Profile

The Economic Impact of Expenditures By Travelers On Minnesota s Northeast Region and The Profile of Travelers. June 2005 May 2006

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

Naples, Marco Island, Everglades Convention and Visitors Bureau March 2013 Visitor Profile

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research Winter 2017 Seasonal Topline. Prepared by

Transcription:

Panama City Beach CVB 2017 Travel Market Visitor Profile & Economic Impact Report Presented by: Berkeley Young, President Young Strategies, Inc. Prepared by: Larry D. Gustke, PhD Steve Morse, PhD Prepared for: Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau Bay County Tourist Development Council Study Conducted: December, 2016 January, 2018 Presentation of Research & Findings March 13, 2018-0 -

Trends and Data Summary & Overview PCB is an extremely large, dynamic destination Year-end economic impact data is typically reported 9-16 months after year-end close of books Fact Tourist Development Tax Revenue Fact STR hotel data Fact VisaVue data from domestic travel expenditures in PCB Fact Destimetrics/Inntopia & AirDNA data for Rentals market Survey Young Strategies online surveys with visitors to PCB Survey Young Strategies intercept interviews with visitors to PCB - 1 -

PANAMA CITY BEACH Tourist Development Tax 4-Year Trend - 2 -

PCB Tourist Development 4-YR Tax Trend $5,000,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 $4,947,031 $4,000,000 $3,855,439 $3,000,000 $2,148,364 $2,000,000 $1,421,784 $1,625,318 $1,900,446 $1,620,578 $1,000,000 $495,113 $728,369 $1,289,221 $591,967 $- Source: Bay County Tax Collection - 3 -

PANAMA CITY BEACH 2017 VISITOR PROFILE - 4 -

Young Surveys - ONLINE VISITOR SURVEY RESPONDENTS (THROUGH JAN, 4, 2018) Season 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Winter (Dec Feb) 400 195 183 306 354 Spring (Mar May) 564 441 406 470 400 Summer (Jun - Aug) 761 1,236 986 850 765 Fall (Sep Nov) 195 449 354 367 540 Total Season Responses 1,920 2,321 1,929 1,993 2,059 Source: YSI online surveys with visitors to PCB - 5 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 6 2017 Visitor Survey Respondents Map - 6 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 2017 Visitor Survey Respondents Map 7-7 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 8 2016/2017 Winter Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=354 2017 Spring Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=400 2017 Summer Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=765 2017 Fall Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=540-8 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 2016/2017 Winter Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=354 9-9 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 10 2017 Spring Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=400-10 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 11 2017 Summer Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=765-11 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 12 2017 Fall Visitor Survey Respondents Map n=540-12 -

PCB VISITOR TRAVEL PATTERNS - 13 -

How many years have you been coming to Panama City Beach? 80% 70% 60% 74% First-time 60% Repeat 67% 77% 50% 40% 30% 26% 40% 33% 23% 20% 10% 0% Winter n=354 Spring n=399 Summer n=765 Fall n=540-14 - 14

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 15 PCB Competitive Position Is Panama City Beach your favorite beach? Yes No 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 12% 23% 17% 13% 88% 77% 83% 87% Winter n=325 Spring n=377 Summer n=715 Fall n=515-15 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 16 PCB Competitive Position Other Panhandle Beaches Visited n=1,820 Other Florida Beaches Visited n=1,402 Destin 45% Do not visit/vacation at other 31% Gulf Shores / Alabama 30% Fort Walton Beach 24% Pensacola 24% Mexico Beach 13% Sandestin 12% 30A - (Rosemary, Seaside, 11% Navarre Beach 8% St George Island 7% South Walton Beach 4% Cape San Blas 4% Other Pan Handle beaches 3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Daytona Beach 56% Clearwater 35% Florida Keys 30% Ft Lauderdale 29% St. Pete Beach 28% Miami 22% Ft Myers 22% Sarasota 16% Others not listed above 14% Naples 12% West Palm 10% Captiva 8% Amelia Island 7% Vero Beach 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% - 16 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 17 Travel Planning Characteristics continued How would you categorize the place that you stayed during your most recent visit? 2017 n=2,012; 2016 n=1,958; 2015 n=1,843; 2014 n=2,237; 2013 n=1,870 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Vacation condo/townhouse rental Hotel/Motel Owner of vacation house/condo Timeshare Vacation house rental Friends or family/house/condo Campground/RV Park Religious Retreat Center 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% - 17 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 18 Vacation Rental Property How many bedrooms were in the rental unit where you stayed? 60% Winter n=274 Spring n=219 Summer n=470 Fall n=300 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Other - 18 -

PCB Average Length of Stay 2014-2017 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fall Summer Spring Winter (-13) Winter (14+) 5.4 5.8 5.5 6.2 2-3 night stays are most prevalent in the shoulder seasons 67.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Source: YSI online surveys with visitors to PCB - 19 -

PCB Average Party Size 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fall 3.1 Summer 4.5 Spring 3.9 Winter (-13) 2.9 Winter (14+) 2.1 1 2 3 4 5 Source: YSI online surveys with visitors to PCB - 20 -

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau 21 Overall PCB Visitor Satisfaction Ratings 2017 OVERALL VISITOR RATING = 4.58 2016 OVERALL VISITOR RATING = 4.55 Consistently high satisfaction on a five point scale. 4-YR Comparative by Season 5 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.7 4 3 Recommending PCB to Others Yes No 98% 96% 98% 98% 100% 80% 60% 2 40% 1 Winter n=326 Spring n=381 Summer n=721 Fall n=318-21 - 20% 0% Winter n=323 2% 4% 2% 2% Spring n=376 Summer n=710 Fall n=510

Panama City Beach Convention & Visitors Bureau PCB 2017 Visitor Amenities Satisfaction Rating Amenity Winter n=324 Spring n=380 Summer n=720 Fall n=517 Quality of beaches 4.81 4.74 4.71 4.81 Range of choices for dining out 4.61 4.48 4.51 4.61 Quality of dining out 4.41 4.42 4.37 4.48 Variety of shopping & merchandise 4.35 4.39 4.37 4.49 Quality of your accommodations 4.31 4.43 4.39 4.47 Ease of finding visitor information 4.3 4.29 4.25 4.38 Overall appeal of the attractions in the area 4.26 4.41 4.46 4.5 Attractiveness/landscaping of the destination 4.23 4.42 4.44 4.52 Lodging value you received for the price paid 4.23 4.31 4.13 4.37 Level of service / employee training 4.17 4.21 4.16 4.27 Signage and wayfinding 4.14 4.23 4.21 4.33 Variety of children's activities 4.06 4.21 4.22 4.28 Night life 3.99 4.19 4.04 4.15 Ease of traffic 3.73 3.46 3.18 3.77 22-22 -

PCB VISITOR SPENDING DATA - 23 -

PCB Total Spending per Party 2014 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $7,000 $6,000 $5,988 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,673 $2,000 $1,401 $2,025 $1,836.00 $1,000 $0 Winter short Winter long Spring Summer Fall - 24 -

2017 Visitor Economic Impact PANAMA CITY BEACH 2017 ECONOMIC IMPACT FROM VISITORS - 25 -

2017 Visitor Economic Impact 2016 Paid Rental Overnight Visitors 2017 Lodging Tax Revenue 2017 Lodging Revenue Person Days/Nights Average Spending Per Person/Per Day Total Overnight Renter Spending $20,977,993 $426,912,714 12,070,706 $ 114.07 $1,376,905,433 2017 Owner Occupied Rental Units Rental Inventory (Rental Units only) Owner Occupied Nights (9% occupancy) Person Days/Nights (avg. party of 5) Average Spending Per Person/Per Day Total Overnight Rental Owner Spending 11,572 380,140 1,900,700 $66.50 $126,396,550-26 -

2017 Visitor Economic Impact 2017 Vacation Home Usage non-resident owners who do not rent Non-Rental Vacation Inventory (Units) Year-round Households in PCB (US Census) Owner Occupied Nights (38% occupancy) Person Days/Nights (avg. party of 4) Average Spending Per Person/Per Day Total Vacation Owner Spending 5,217 723,597 2,894,392 $66.50 $192,477,068 2017 Visiting Friends & Relatives (VFR) - Staying With Year-Round Residents Number of Houseguests (10 guests per house) (5.5 avg. length of stay) Houseguests Person Days/Nights (avg. party of 4) Average Spending Per Person/Per Day Total VFR Spending 5,146 51,460 283, 030 $38.50 $10,896,671 17,148,828 person days/nights Total 2017 Overnight Visitor Spending in PCB $1,706,675,722. - 27 -

2016 Visitor Economic Impact Day-Trippers Day-trippers and other non-overnight visitors to PCB from outside of Bay County Estimated to account for 11.6% of the overall overnight visitor spending of $1,706,675,722. Therefore day-tripper spending totals $197,974,384. The majority of this day-trip spending in PCB is realized at large scale retail, unique PCB attractions, unique dining experiences, festivals/events and Northwest Florida Beaches International airport and rental car operations. The growth in large-scale retail and dining has increased the number of day-trippers that come into PCB for day-trips. - 28 -

2016 Visitor Economic Impact 2017 Economic Indicator Direct Impacts Indirect Impacts Induced Impacts Total Impacts (Direct + Indirect + Induced) Visitor Spending $1,904,650,106 ($1.90 Billion) $431,488,958 ($431.48 million) $540,244,176 ($540.24 million) $2,876,363,240 ($2.87 Billion) Worker Incomes & Paychecks $1,038,180,153 ($1.03 billion) $295,991,967 ($295.91 million) $345,745,960 ($345.74 million) $1,679,918,081 ($1.67 Billion) Employment / Jobs 33,978 4,658 5,663 44,299-29 -

2016 Visitor Economic Impact DEFINITION OF DIRECT AND SECONDARY ECONOMIC EFFECTS Economists distinguish direct, indirect and induced economic effects. The total economic impact of tourism is the sum of direct, indirect and induced effects within a region. Indirect and induced effects are sometimes collectively called secondary effects. These impacts or effects may be measured in terms of gross output, sales, income, employment, or value added. Although they are often used somewhat loosely by non-economists, these terms have precise definitions that are important when interpreting economic impact study results. Direct effects are production changes associated with the immediate effects of changes in tourism expenditures. For example, an increase in the number of tourists staying overnight in hotels would directly increase room sales in the hotel sector. The additional hotel sales and associated changes in hotel payments for wages, salaries, taxes, supplies and services are direct effects of the tourist spending. Indirect effects are the production changes resulting from various rounds of re-spending of the tourism industry's receipts in backward-linked industries (e.g. industries supplying products and services to hotels). Changes in sales, jobs and income in the linen supply industry, for example, represent indirect effects of changes in hotel sales. Businesses supplying products and services to the linen supply industry represent another round of indirect effects, eventually linking hotels by varying degrees to most other economic sectors in the region. Induced effects are the changes in economic activity resulting from household spending of income earned directly or indirectly as a result of tourism spending. For example, hotel and linen supply employees, supported directly or indirectly by tourism, spend their income in the local region for housing, food, transportation, and the usual array of household product and service needs. The sales, income, and jobs that result from household spending of added wage, salary, or proprietor s income are induced effects. - 30 -

Contact Information Berkeley Young Young Strategies, Inc byoung@youngstrategies.com (704) 677-4018 www.facebook/young Strategies www.linkedin.com/berkeleyyoung - 31 -

Young Strategies Research Team Experience Destination research and strategic planning Development and management of conference centers Research for 150+ destinations in 32 states Communities, regions and states Travel industry focused National research data and trends analysis Writing and speaking Board workshops & planning sessions Listening to travelers - 32 -