The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (Phase 1) Final Report

Similar documents
Endless investment opportunities in public infrastructure and services Carlos Herrera Investors Servicing Director

Investment Opportunities in Public infrastructure and Public Service Infrastructure ProInversion (State Initiatives and Unsolicited proposals

GUIDE BOOK.

LIMA UVEQ Toward Earthquake Resilient City

Recommended Itinerary

Updated on November 28, 2016

HDR itrans Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel: (905) Fax: (905)

Detailed Itinerary DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3

Kingston Transportation Master Plan Draft Report Transit Forecasting 1

Investment Opportunitiesin Public infrastructure and Public Service ProInversion Updated to April 22, 2015

Explore Bogota on a fun bike tour guided by a local. Visit all the must-see sights as well as Bogota's best-kept secrets.

PORTS TORONTO Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Summary of 2015 Traffic and Passenger Surveys

Our Trip 2016 JUL 14, SEP 6, 2016 VANCOUVER, TORONTO, LIMA, BARRANCO, IQUITOS, ICA, AREQUIPA, PUERTO MALDONADO, HUANCHACO - TRUJILLO - LA

Investment Opportunities in public infrastructure and public services ProInversión (State Initiatives and Unsolicited proposals projects)

Investment Opportunities in Public infrastructure and Public Service Infrastructure ProInversion Updated to September 2

Technical Paper 1 Traffic report

-2SD +2SD -3SD -2SD -3SD -2SD

A6.8.1 Air Transport Network in Cambodia

Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report CHAPTER 8 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

APPENDIX J MODIFICATIONS PERFORMED TO THE TOR

B. Congestion Trends. Congestion Trends

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT FOR PROPOSED OFFICE PROJECT AT 959 SEWARD STREET IN HOLLYWOOD SNYDER PARTNERS

Investment Opportunities in public infrastructure and public services ProInversión (State Initiatives and Unsolicited proposals projects)

MEMORANDUM. Lynn Hayes LSA Associates, Inc.

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

V. DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM

Project Deliverable 4.1.3f Individual City Report - City of San Dimas

MEMORANDUM. Bob Zagozda, Chief Financial Officer Westside Community Schools. Mark Meisinger, PE, PTOE Felsburg Holt & Ullevig. DATE: June 11, 2018

INFORMATION BULLETIN LOCATION

Line 2 and Avenida Faucet Avenida Gambetta Branch Line Concession of the Lima and Callao Basic Metro Network Informative Report.

Evaluation of High-Occupancy-Vehicle

Enrique García Conde. Focus Areas. Overview. Professional and Community Affiliations

CHAPTER 4: BASIC ANALYSYS ON ROADSIDE INTERVIEW SURVEY

INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES USED IN TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENTS OF DEVELOPMENTS IN CONGESTED NETWORKS

Fans of leisure and entertaiment areas have a place of interest for tourists like Patio del Ekeko.

Central Coast Origin-Destination Survey

Traffic Analysis Final Report

Lake Erie Commerce Center Traffic Analysis

Asset Portfolio. Key figures and location JULY, 2018

CHRISTCHURCH MOTORWAYS. Project Summary Statement February 2010

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

RARE STAND ALONE PAD WITH DRIVE-THRU ACCESSIBILITY ON

A geographic index to measure the carrying capacity for tourism in the populated centers of Galapagos

November 11, 2009 BY . Planning and Growth Management Department 110 Laurier Avenue West, 4 th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1. Dear Mr.

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

Victor Andres Belaunde Ave. 147, Real Cuatro Building, 3 rd Floor, San Isidro

THE PORT OF SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE BEATS A NEW RECORD, SEVEN CRUISES IN A DAY

HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEY

PDF compression, OCR, web optimization using a watermarked evaluation copy of CVISION PDFCompressor

SANTA TERESA, NM AVAILABLE LAND FOR SALE CBRE, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Planning, Development and Environment Committee

LUDWIG RD. SUBDIVISION PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

1.2 Corridor History and Current Characteristics

Project Deliverable 4.1.3d Individual City Report - City of La Verne

APPENDIX H MILESTONE 2 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS OF THE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

Bird Strike Damage Rates for Selected Commercial Jet Aircraft Todd Curtis, The AirSafe.com Foundation

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF FORECAST ELEMENTS

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RECENT SCENARIO PLANNING FOR THE REGIONAL FREEWAY AND HIGHWAY PROGRAM MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

Watts St westbound thru

STUDY DESCRIPTION MEMORANDUM. DATE April 20, 2011

2006 WEEKDAY TRAFFIC PROFILE. June 15, 2007

Annual Transit Ridership Monitoring Report Fiscal Year

Construction underway. STATUS: 229 5,190 5,419 5,305 STIP REFERENCE #FR /01/2013

Washington St. & Ash Coulee Dr./43 rd Ave Intersection Study

Cancha de Golf l Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92091

Public Transport Volumes in Prague and its Suburbs

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT


SANTA CLARA COUNTY I-280 CORRIDOR STUDY

Three-story 7,704 SF architecturally distinct office building on one of the most sought after blocks in downtown Santa Barbara

INFRASTRUCTURE GAP

Latin America s Physical Geography. EQ: What are characteristics of Latin America s physical features?

Activities for Lima's 473rd Anniversary

Imagine the result. Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study. Laredo Urban Transportation Study. August 31 st, 2011

Peruvian Banknotes Central Reserve Bank of Peru. Law No.13958

Shifting Export Destinations by Legality Sensitivity a Peruvian Case Study

International Civil Aviation Organization and Civil Aviation Authority of Panama

Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission 2010 Travel Time Survey

Section A: Scheme Summary

November 2016 PERISUR MORE THAN 30,000 TICKETS DAILY MOLIERE 222 INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS AICM 24/7 ON CALL 10 YEARS IN MEXICO SPECIAL EDITION

Private Investment and Public Works

HOV LANE PERFORMANCE MONITORING: 2000 REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

US 380 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Table : M-2 Highway International Roughness Index Table : Baseline Link Capacity Assessment

Urban Transport in Metropolitan Areas (P095485)

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Metro Rail Gold Line Eastside Extension - Operations

Unión Andina de Cementos S.A.A UNACEM S.A.A.

Freeway Volume-Crash Summary

Chapter 22 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Demand Management Plan for the Proposed Hampton Inn & Suites in San Mateo, California

The US 69 Corridor - Challenges and Opportunities at a Glance

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1 P age

PPP A WAY TO MODERNIZE CURRENT CONCESSIONS. Barcelona, November 2016

New Qingdao Jiaodong International Airport Qingdao, China (TAO) Flight Path Analysis Preliminary Findings Report

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

According to FAA Advisory Circular 150/5060-5, Airport Capacity and Delay, the elements that affect airfield capacity include:

Evaluation of Significant Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia Transportation District. HB 599 Ratings Overview NVTA - January 22, 2015

INFORMATION BULLETIN

Transcription:

The Master Plan for Lima and Callao Metropolitan Area Urban Transportation in the Republic of Peru (2) Traffic at Screen Line The total number of vehicle trips passing Rimac river and Av. Panamericana Sur are 632 thousand and 144 thousand, respectively, at both directions per day. 312 (1,777) 320 (1,737) 71 (380) Vehicle (person) Unit: 1,000 / day 73 (461) Figure 4.2-2 Traffic Volume Crossing Screen Lines Figure 4.2-2 through Figure 4.2-6 show the traffic volume counted at each station on the screen lines. On the screen line on Rimac river, the traffic volume at Del Ejercito bridge is highest at 114 thousand vehicles (559 thousand passenger trips), followed by Faucett bridge at 75 thousand (400 thousand passenger trips) and Huascar bridge on the Av. Panamericana Sur, at 75 thousand (392 thousand passenger trips). In the case of Av. Panamericana Sur, the highest volume (62 thousand vehicles/day or 428 thousand passenger trips) is observed at Atocongo bridge where Traffic observed at each survey station can be summarized in Table 4.2-2. In general, all station has a very low value in terms of peak ratio, except a few stations. This means that there is no concentration of traffic and congestion observe all day. The ratio of public transport traffic ranges 20% to 40%, except three stations where the public transport is prohibited to operate. Hourly fluctuation of traffic counted both two-screen lines is illustrated in Figure 4.2-7 through Figure 4.2-11. 4-8

75,110 113,974 74,976 Pte. Nuevo Pte. Faucett Pte. del Ejercito Pte. Huascar Pte. Santa Rosa Pte. Ricardo Palma Traffic Volume (x 1000 vehs) 100 Figure 4.2-3 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day) 559,125 400,160 392,004 400,257 Pte. Nuevo Pte. Faucett Pte. del Ejercito Pte. Huascar Pte. Santa Rosa Pte. Ricardo Palma Passesnger volume (total, x 1000pers) 200 Person Figure 4.2-4 Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day) 4-9

SS-6 61,915 SS-7 30,157 SS-4 39,879 Traffic Volume (per day) 10,000 VEH SS-2 5,427 SS-1 5,568 Figure 4.2-5 Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day) SS-6 427,634 SS-7 175,748 SS-4 211,377 Passenger Volume (per day) 100,000 PER SS-2 8,190 SS-1 17,365 Figure 4.2-6 Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Passenger/day) 4-10

Table 4.2-2 Summary of Traffic at Screen Line Stations No. of Trips Counted Public Screen Line No. Station Name Peak Ratio Transport Truck Ratio Vehicles Passengers Ratio (000) (000) (%) (%) (%) SL-01 Puente Gambetta 25 99 9.3 23.7 22.1 SL-02 Puente Faucett 75 400 7.1 32.1 2.0 SL-03 Puente Union 55 283 6.6 23.7 5.7 SL-04 Puente Duenas 36 161 7.4 24.0 4.0 SL-05 Puente del Ejercito 114 559 6.5 20.7 6.2 SL-06 Puente Santa Rosa 51 389 7.7 29.8 0.4 Rimac River SL-07 Puente Trujillo 15 17 9.3 0.0 0.1 SL-08 Puente Ricardo Palma 53 400 7.2 24.3 0.6 SL-09 Puente Balta 3 4 9.1 1.4 2.6 SL-10 Puente Huanuco 54 268 7.2 28.9 6.7 SL-11 Puente Huascar 75 392 7.5 35.3 14.2 SL-12 Puente Miguel Grau 54 282 6.1 29.0 7.8 SL-13 Puente Huachipa 20 104 7.2 28.1 18.6 SS-01 AV. Pachacutec 6 17 7.1 18.7 22.4 South SS-02 AV. Sol 5 8 9.5 0.7 12.6 Pan-American SS-04 AV. Vargas Machuca 40 211 7.2 35.4 6.4 Highway SS-06 AV. Pachacutec 62 428 6.5 38.4 2.6 SS-07 AV. ROSA LOZANO 30 176 7.2 29.5 6.8 4-11

Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline Rimac River 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 25,217 0 06:00-07:00 07:00-08:00 08:00-09:00 09:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-13:00 13:00-14:00 14:00-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 17:00-18:00 18:00-19:00 19:00-20:00 20:00-21:00 21:00-22:00 22:00-23:00 Traffic Volume(veh/hr) N-S S-N Hour Figure 4.2-7 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Vehicle/day) Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline Rimac River Traffic Volume(veh/hr) 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 189,486 N-S S-N 0 06:00-07:00 07:00-08:00 08:00-09:00 09:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-13:00 13:00-14:00 14:00-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 17:00-18:00 18:00-19:00 19:00-20:00 20:00-21:00 21:00-22:00 22:00-23:00 Hour Figure 4.2-8 Hourly Traffic Volume on Rimac River Screen Line (Passenger/day) 4-12

Hourly Traffic Volume on Screenline P.A.S. Traffic Volume(veh/hr) 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 4,887 W-E E-W 0 Figure 4.2-9 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Vehicle/day) Hourly Passenger Volume on Screenline P.A.S. 40,000 35,000 30,000 36,363 W-E E-W 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 06:00-07:00 07:00-08:00 08:00-09:00 09:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-13:00 13:00-14:00 14:00-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 17:00-18:00 18:00-19:00 19:00-20:00 20:00-21:00 21:00-22:00 22:00-23:00 06:00-07:00 07:00-08:00 08:00-09:00 09:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-13:00 13:00-14:00 14:00-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-17:00 17:00-18:00 18:00-19:00 19:00-20:00 20:00-21:00 21:00-22:00 22:00-23:00 Hour Passengers/hr Hour Figure 4.2-10 Hourly Traffic Volume on South Pan-American Screen Line (Passenger/day) 4-13

Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.S by Vehicle (Total) Modal Share of Screenline-P.A.S by passenger (Total) Microbus 10.9% Bus Truck 4.6% 5.7% M/C 3.7% Car 24.2% Bus 22.6% Truck 1.0% M/C 0.5% Car 7.5% Taxi 5.5% Combi 18.0% Taxi 32.9% Microbus 33.2% Combi 29.7% Microbus 8.2% Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac River by Vehicle (Total) Bus 4.4% Truck 6.6% M/C 1.9% Car 28.6% Modal Share of Screenline-Rimac River by passenger (Total) Truck 1.2% Bus 24.2% M/C 0.3% Car 10.3% Taxi 7.3% Combi 13.9% Taxi 36.4% Microbus 29.9% Combi 26.7% Figure 4.2-11 Modal Share on the Screen line (3) Traffic at Principal Road Sections Figure 4.2-12 through Figure 4.2-15 show traffic volume counted in periods from 6:00 to 10:00. The following can be obvious: a) In time period from 6:00 7:00 and 7:00 8:00, there is traffic generated in the north part of the Study area, which is going to the central area. b) In time period from 8:00 9:00, there is a generation in the central and south area, and the congestion in the central area starts. c) The congestion in the north area and south area are relieved and the congestion in the central area still remains. 4-14

Traffic Volume (6:00-7:00) 1,500-2,500 1,000-1,500 500-1,000 0-500 Figure 4.2-12 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 6:00 to 7:00 Traffic Volume (7:00-8:00) 2,500-9,999 1,500-2,500 1,000-1,500 500-1,000 0-500 Figure 4.2-13Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 7:00 to 8:00 4-15

Traffic Volume (8:00-9:00) 2,500-9,999 (15) 1,500-2,500 (44) 1,000-1,500 (29) 500-1,000 (30) 0-500 (7) Figure 4.2-14 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 8:00 to 9:00 Traffic Volume (9:00-10:00) 2,500-9,999 1,500-2,500 1,000-1,500 500-1,000 0-500 Figure 4.2-15 Traffic Volume Counted in Periods from 9:00 to 10:00 4-16