New Method for Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ships

Similar documents
Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ferry Transportation

Analysis of technical data of Ro-Ro ships

Hans Otto Kristensen. Consulting Naval Architect Phone: Mail: Evaluation of CO 2 emissions from cruise ships

DFDS A/S H Analyst meeting 30 August 2006

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Reporting Instructions FILING REQUIREMENTS

Port dues and charges Free port of Ventspils

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Annual & Hourly Cost Detail

Airplane Value Analysis Alex Philip

EMERGENCY TOWING CAPABILITIES IN LITHUANIA. Igor Kuzmenko Lietuvos maritime academy

Falcon 2000S & Challenger 350 Analysis

180.8 million passengers, nearly 17.7 million cars and 3.3 million cargo units. Every year 6.4 million passengers travel on Viking Line s vessels.

An Introduction to the M. V. Marine Svetaeva

MARINE CIRCULAR MC-1/2013/1

CHARGES REGULATIONS APPLYING TO COPENHAGEN AIRPORT IN FORCE DURING THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2018 TO 31 MARCH 2019

Citation XLS Analysis - Owner & Charter Hour Contributions. Prepared March 31, 2017

For Immediate Release September 3, CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ON NEW CABLE FERRY Special steel cutting ceremony held at shipyard

CN Di Pesaro Naumachos 82. Price: 3,950,000

Statistics of Air, Water, and Land Transport Statistics of Air, Water, and Land. Transport Released Date: August 2015

TARIFF OF HARBOUR DUES

WATERBORNE TRANSIT. April 21, 2010

BHP Billiton Scope 3 emissions

A. TARIFF SCHEDULE OF PORT SERVICES

By providing more capacity than any other twin-engine freighter, the 777F brings new levels of efficiency to the long-haul market.

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT HARBOUR MASTER S OFFICE OF RAVENNA ORDER NO. 97/2017

Clustering ferry ports class-i based on the ferry ro-ro tonnages and main dimensions

Unitised goods via Danish ports in 2004 and the North Sea Region

The MAGALOG Project LNG-fueled shipping in the Baltic Sea

460 exp 460EXP - 115

ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED OPERATIONAL MEASURES. Guido Kerkhofs Director ATM Programmes EUROCONTROL

/-400ER Freighters

FERRY MARKET AND STRATEGY

MARITIME DIRECTORATE OF RAVENNA. DECREE no. 13/2014

86' (26.21m) Cantiere delle Marche

PORT CHARGES AND FEES

Airplane Performance. Introduction. Copyright 2017 Boeing. All rights reserved.

CRUISE TABLE OF CONTENTS

ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL CHALLENGES IN LNG CONVERSIONS. 1 Wärtsilä

National Standard for Tonnage Measurement and Calculation on Myanmar Waters General Definitions 2.

Propulsion Trends in Container Vessels

RESOLUTION MSC.234(82) RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING TONNAGE MEASUREMENT OF OPEN-TOP CONTAINERSHIPS

LIFTing HEAVY CARGO FOR WORLDWIDE TRANSPORT

Order on the discharge of oil from ships in the exclusive economic zone around Greenland

Runway Length Analysis Prescott Municipal Airport

Atlantic Interoperability Initiative to Reduce Emissions AIRE

SEA SHIPPING EMISSIONS 2012: NETHERLANDS CONTINENTAL SHELF, 12-MILE ZONE, PORT AREAS AND OSPAR REGION II

Guyana Civil Aviation Authority. ATR Form M Instructions

P.001.FPG FUEL PLANNING GUIDE. First Edition

Report on shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea area during 2010

IMO / ILO REQUIREMENTS FROM 2014

Transport Expert Panel. Summary Report Krakow,

Port Everglades Master/Vision Plan Update

WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

Reducing emissions through innovative tug design

Irish Continental Group plc Results Presentation, 23 March 2010

Travel and Tourism in Denmark to 2017

The text of the amendment is arranged to show deleted, new or amended text, as shown below:

Key Performance Indicators

PASSENGER SHIP SAFETY. Damage stability of cruise passenger ships: Monitoring and assessing risk from operation of watertight doors

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURES AND TRANSPORT HARBOUR MASTER S OFFICE OF RAVENNA ORDER NO. 95/2015

MARPOL Consolidated Edition 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Washington Aviation System Plan Update July 2017 i

NORWEGIAN AIR SHUTTLE ASA QUARTERLY REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2006 [This document is a translation from the original Norwegian version]

LOA: 163' 9" (49.90m) Beam: 30' 2" (9.19m) Min Draft: 6' 7" (2.00m) Max Draft: 9' 3" (2.80m) Cruise Speed: 14 Kts. (16 MPH)

Environmental Assessment. Runway 14 Smart Tracking Approach Gold Coast Airport

ATR-600 SERIES THE LEADING TURBOPROP

MARITIME DIRECTORATE OF RAVENNA. DECREE no. 21/2016

Freedom S.40 COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

Unitised Goods Transport via Danish Ports 2004

BDSF SPECIAL FREIGHTER CONVERSION

logy=a+blogx ( R 2 = 0.942, σ= ) 50% 75% a b Y=α X β 50% 75% α β

Fuel Burn Impacts of Taxi-out Delay and their Implications for Gate-hold Benefits

Port of Newcastle Schedule of Port Pricing

Evaluation of Alternative Aircraft Types Dr. Peter Belobaba

Gulf Carrier Profitability on U.S. Routes

Frequently Asked Questions

NOTICE B-1. Harbour Fees Tariff

PORT CHARGES For the use of PORT OF BERGEN's infrastructure and services (SHORT VERSION FOR CRUISE SHIPS, PLEASURE CRAFTS/YACTHS)

De luchtvaart in het EU-emissiehandelssysteem. Summary

Changes in Berth Hire Charges from the previous edition have been highlighted.

TRAFFIC COMMERCIAL AIR CARRIERS

Private Client Services LLC. Dedicated to representing only the Fiduciary Interests of the Yacht Buyer MARTHA ANN. 230' 2008 LURSSEN Malta $79,000,000

SCHEDULE OF PORT CHARGES

Green Cruise Port from the Cruise Network point of view

LNG the future fuel in ferry and cruise ship ports?!

HARBOUR DUES. The Port of Helsingborg

Thermal efficiency improvement and technology transfer of chimney stove for producing stove; Amphoe Bo Kluea, Nan Province

PART D: Potential environmental impact of proposals affecting Southport, Formby, Ormskirk, Skelmersdale and surrounding areas

Green House Gases Footprint: Cruise vers Car

APPENDIX X: RUNWAY LENGTH ANALYSIS

EUR BAM A/c up to 25 tons MTOW 11,00 22,00. A/c over 25 tons MTOW 14,00 27,00

ATR FREIGHTER VERSIONS. AN EASY CONVERSION AVAILABLE SINCE 2002, TO EXTEND ATR s

M/V. Tonnage Measurement (ITC-69) Tartous Naval Architect. Guardian Bureau of Shipping LLC Page 1 of 14 Form 5510/TM-69/GBS/DEL/01

Cargo Aircraft Specifications

ANA Traffic Growth Incentives Programme Terms and Conditions

Fuel consumption & fuel cost for different vessel types and Member States Key message

Shanghai Green Port Construction. Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission

The Polar Code and the Canadian Arctic

Transcription:

New Method for Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ships By Hans Otto Holmegaard Kristensen Senior researcher, M.Sc. Technical University of Denmark (hohk@mek.dtu.dk)

Overview of presentation 1. Definition of a Ro Ro passenger ship and examples 2. The dilemma how to distribute the total emissions on the different types of cargo 3. State of the art in IMO/MEPC for Ro-Ro passenger ships 4. Presentation of the principles in the new evaluation method 5. Analysis result 6. Calculation example 7. Summary and conclusion 2 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Ro Ro passenger ship definition A Ro-Ro passenger ship is a ship which: 1) Carries more than 12 passengers and which has 2) Ro-Ro spaces or special category spaces which means that a Ro-Ro passenger ship transports: 1) Passengers (day and night facilities) 2) Cars 3) Busses 4) Trucks and trailers 5) Trains etc. 3 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Danish ferry Kalundborg 1931 4 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Danish ferry Prinsesse Anne Marie 1960 5 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Danish ferry Peder Paars 1985 6 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Danish ferry Mette Mols 1996 7 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Day and night ferry Pearl of Scandinavia Copenhagen Oslo route 8 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Energy Efficiency Operational Index (EEOI) Total CO 2 emissions EEOI = Capacity x Speed Capacity can be: Deadweight Payload Lanemeters Passengers Gross tonnage (GT) 9 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (EPI) Emissions EPI = Cargo type x Speed Cargo type can be: Truck (depending on length) Bus Van Car Passenger (unberhed) Passenger (berthed) 10 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (EPI) Emissions EPI = Cargo type x Speed How can the emissions be allocated to the different types of cargo in correct way? Ro-Ro passenger ships carry a mix of cargo (trucks, busses, cars, vans passengers etc.) The mix of cargo differs from trip to trip! 11 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (EPI) Basic assumption for new calculation method: 1. The emissions are related to the weight of each cargo type including the fraction of the ships lightweight which is associated with the carriage of the actual cargo 2. If the average weight density of the need cargo space is nearly constant irrespective of cargo type, the emissions can be related to the volume of each cargo type 12 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (EPI) Types of spaces related to Ro Ro pass. ships: 1. Space for rolling cargo (trucks, busses, vans, cars - including space for casings and ventilation and similar) 2. Space for passengers (cafeterias, restaurants, lounges, corridors and toilets) 3. Service volume (galleys, store rooms, air condition rooms, shop offices and similar) 4. Sleeping accommodation for passengers (cabins and associated corridors) 13 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (trucks and lorries) Volume (m³) 80000 60000 40000 1974-2010 Volume = 22.8 x lanemetres Volume per lanemeter: 24 m 3 20000 Volume (m³) 100000 0 80000 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 Lanemetres 60000 2000-2010 Volume = 24.1 x lanemetres 40000 20000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Lanemetres 14 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Volume (m³) Environmental performance (cars) 60000 45000 30000 Volume per car: 67.5 m 3 15000 0 1974-2010 Volume = 62.3 x cars 0 300 600 900 Car capacity Volume (m³) 60000 45000 30000 15000 0 2000-2010 Volume = 65.9 x cars + 1327 0 300 600 900 Car capacity 15 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (passenger volume) Volume (m³) 30000 24000 18000 12000 Volume = 9.2 x passengers High comfort class Low comfort class a 6000 0 Volume = 5.0 x passengers 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 Passengers 16 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (service volume) Volume (m³) 15000 12000 9000 high comfort low comfort Linear (high comfort) Linear (low comfort) Volume = 3.4 x pass. + 500 6000 3000 0 Volume = 2.1 x pass. + 145 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Passengers 17 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (cabins/berths) Volume (m³) 32000 24000 16000 8000 Volume = 13 x berths 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Berths 18 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (area and volume) Area and volume equivalents General Low comfort High comfort m 2 per lanemeter 4 - - m 3 per lanemeter 24 - - m 2 per car 15 - - m 3 per car 67.5 - - m 2 per unberthed passenger 3.5 2.5 4.5 m 3 per unberthed passenger 10 7 13 m 2 per berthed passenger 4.5 - - m 3 per berthed passenger 13 - - 19 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (weight density) Area and volume equivalents General Cargo density (t/m 3 ) Weight density (t/m 3 ) Total density m 2 per lanemeter 4 m 3 per lanemeter 24 0.119 0.08 0.199 m 2 per car 15 m 3 per car 67.5 0.019 0.08 0.099 m 2 per unberthed passenger 3.5 m 3 per unberthed passenger 10 0.008 0.15 0.158 m 2 per berthed passenger 4.5 m 3 per berthed passenger 13 0.0062 0.15 0.156 1 truck: 14 m and 40 tons 1 car: 1.25 tons 1 person: 80 kg 20 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (calculation principles) Maximum number of units Units Volume per unit in m 3 Product Emissions per cargo unit per nautical mile N1 Lanemetres 24 V1 = N1 x 24 E1 = 24/Vn x Q/V N2 Cars 67.5 V2 = N2 x 67.5 E2 = 67.5/Vn x Q/V N3 Unberthed pass. 10 V3 = N3 x 10 E3 = 10/Vn x Q/V N4 Berthed pass. 13 V4 = N4 x 13 E4 = 13/Vn x Q/V Vn = sum of this column Emissions per hour (g/hour) Speed (knots) Q V 21 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (Equivalent volume) Ro-Ro passenger ships 125000 100000 Cargo volume (m 3 ) 75000 50000 25000 0 30 70 110 150 190 230 Length pp (m) 22 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (100 % loaded) Ro-Ro passenger ships 30 25 gram CO2/m 3 /nm 20 15 10 5 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Length pp (m) 23 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (100 % loaded) 32 Ro-Ro passenger ships 28 Service speed (knots) 24 20 16 12 8 30 70 110 150 190 230 Length pp (m) 24 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (100 % loaded) Ro-Ro cargo ships 300 CO2 emissions (g/lm/naut.mile) 250 200 150 100 50 0 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Lanemeter 25 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance (100 % loaded) CO2 emissions (g/lm/naut.mile) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Ro-Ro cargo ships Ro-Ro passenger ships Truck 0 30 70 110 150 190 230 Length pp (m) 26 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance calculation example Mols Line (Aarhus - Kalundborg) - 2010 Maximum Maximum volume equivalent Actual value Actual volume equivalent Allocation in pct. Lanemeters 1200 28800 486 11673 81.4 Cars 0 0 31 2064 14.4 Unberthed passengers 600 4200 85 595 4.2 Berthed passengers 0 0 0 0 Total volume equivalent - 33000-14331 100.0 Passenger comfort class (1 = low comfort, 2 = general, 3 = high comfort) 1 Average capacity utilization based on calculated volume equivalents (pct.) 43.4 Area and volume equivalents General Low comfort High comfort Cargo density (t/m 3 ) Weight density (t/m 3 ) m 2 per lanemeter 4 - - m 3 per lanemeter 24 - - 0.119 0.08 m 2 per car 15 - - m 3 per car 67.5 - - 0.019 0.08 m 2 per unberthed passenger 3.5 2.5 4.5 m 3 per unberthed passenger 10 7 13 0.008 0.15 m 2 per berthed passenger 4.5 - - m 3 per berthed passenger 13 - - 0.0062 0.15 Oil consumption and speed Fuel oil per hour kg/hour 1162 Crossing time (minutes) 170 Diesel oil per hour kg/hour 113 Speed knots 16.6 EEOI (CO 2 per transport unit per nautical mile) CO 2 per lorry (or bus) per nm (kg/nm) The ship kg/nm 240 12 m lorry 15 m lorry 18 m lorry Lanes g/m/nm 402 4.82 6.03 7.23 Cars g/car/nm 1130 Unberthed passengers g/pass/nm 117 Berthed passengers g/pass/nm - 27 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance calculation example Mols Line (Aarhus - Kalundborg) - 2011 Maximum Maximum volume equivalent Actual value Actual volume equivalent Lanemeters 1200 28800 671 16108 84 Cars 0 0 37 2476 13 Unberthed passengers 600 4200 85 595 3 Berthed passengers 0 0 0 0 Total volume equivalent - 33000-19180 100 Passenger comfort class (1 = low comfort, 2 = general, 3 = high comfort) 1 Average capacity utilization based on calculated volume equivalents (pct.) 58.1 Area and volume equivalents General Low comfort High comfort Cargo density (t/m 3 ) Weight density (t/m 3 ) m 2 per lanemeter 4 - - m 3 per lanemeter 24 - - 0.119 0.08 m 2 per car 15 - - m 3 per car 67.5 - - 0.019 0.08 m 2 per unberthed passenger 3.5 2.5 4.5 m 3 per unberthed passenger 10 7 13 0.008 0.15 m 2 per berthed passenger 4.5 - - m 3 per berthed passenger 13 - - 0.0062 0.15 Oil consumption and speed Fuel oil per hour kg/hour 934 Crossing time (minutes) 180 Diesel oil per hour kg/hour 91 Speed knots 15.7 EEOI (CO 2 per transport unit per nautical mile) CO 2 per lorry (or bus) per nm (kg/nm) The ship kg/nm 204 12 m lorry 15 m lorry 18 m lorry Lanes g/m/nm 255 3.07 3.83 4.60 Cars g/car/nm 718 Unberthed passengers g/pass/nm 75 Berthed passengers g/pass/nm - 28 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Environmental performance calculation example 29 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Thank you! 30 DTU Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark