Tourism Report Spring A Report Prepared by the Sonoma County Economic Development Board. Ben Stone, Director

Similar documents
The Hotel Industry: The United States, Virginia And Hampton Roads

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Jacksonville, FL. June 2016

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts p

Temecula Valley Travel Impacts

U.S. HOTEL SUPPLY GROWTH STILL IN CHECK WITH DEMAND

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

State of the Industry Report. Presented by Hon. Beverly Nicholson-Doty. Chairman, Caribbean Tourism Organization. Government House.

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

AIR TRANSPORT MARKET ANALYSIS MAY 2011

MEMORANDUM MARKET OVERVIEW. Matt Roberts, Director of Parks and Recreation City of Carpinteria. Kevin Engstrom James Rabe. Date: June 21, 2016

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County. July 2017

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2018

CITY OF COTATI: LOCAL ECONOMIC REPORT

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

IATA ECONOMICS BRIEFING AIRLINE BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDEX OCTOBER 2010 SURVEY

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR DECEMBER 2014 KEY POINTS

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

SLOW GROWTH OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ECONOMY

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County, June 2018

MONTEREY COUNTY TRAVEL IMPACTS P

THE 2006 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRAVEL & TOURISM IN INDIANA

2004 Nassau/PI Tourism in Review

California Travel Impacts by County,

SLOW BUT SUSTAINED GROWTH FOR 2014 FORECASTS REMAIN POSITIVE FOR THE HOTEL SECTOR, WITH A CAUTIOUS EYE TOWARDS CONSTRUCTION

Hawai i Hotels Statewide Set New Annual Records in 2017 for Revenue Per Available Room and Average Daily Rate

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR JULY 2014 KEY POINTS

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) Aug 2013 vs. Aug 2012 YTD 2013 vs. YTD 2012 Aug 2013 vs. Jul 2013

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REPORT INDUSTRY REPORT

California Travel Impacts p

Tourist Traffic in the City of Rijeka For the Period Between 2004 and 2014

Estimates of the Economic Importance of Tourism

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR OCTOBER 2015 KEY POINTS

Tourism in numbers

Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2010

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

AIR PASSENGER MARKET ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2015 KEY POINTS

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) June 2012 vs. June 2011 YTD 2012 vs. YTD 2011 RPK ASK PLF FTK AFTK FLF RPK ASK PLF FTK AFTK FLF

How much did the airline industry recover since September 11, 2001?

IATA ECONOMIC BRIEFING DECEMBER 2008

State of the Industry Report Presented by Hugh Riley, Secretary General, Caribbean Tourism Organization. February 10 th, 2015

OREGON S TRAVEL & TOURISM INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

AIR TRANSPORT MARKET ANALYSIS APRIL 2011

2016 Annual Tourism Performance Report.

Queensland Economic Update

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Buncombe County, North Carolina

Economic Impact of Tourism in South Dakota, December 2017

US $ 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000

AIR PASSENGER MARKET ANALYSIS

Chattanooga & Hamilton Co. Tourism Trends & Economic Outlook

The Economic Impact of Travel in Kansas. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

The Economic Impact of Tourism in: Dane County & Madison, Wisconsin. April 2017

TRENDS. IN THE HOTEL INDUSTRY Northern California AUGUST Shifts in Revenue and Expenses Improve Hotel Food and Beverage Profits

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR SEPTEMBER 2012 KEY POINTS

SONOMA COUNTY ANNUAL TOURISM REPORT INDUSTRY REPORT

Airlines across the world connected a record number of cities this year, with more than 20,000 city pair connections*

The Economic Impact of Tourism in North Carolina. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2013

Oregon Travel Impacts p

Index of business confidence. Monthly FTK (Billions) Sep 2013 vs. Sep 2012 YTD 2013 vs. YTD 2012 Sep 2013 vs. Aug 2013

Quarterly Aviation Industry Performance

Tourism activity supports 60,007 full-time equivalent jobs locally

Greene County Tourism Economic Impact Analysis and Strategic Goals

CTO State of the Industry Report Dissecting the Numbers Presented By Ryan Skeete, Director of Research & IT (ag) February 16 th, 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2014

The OECS was hardest hit by reduced arrivals showing an overall 12.3% decline in 2009

Louisiana Travel Pulse September 2007

The Economic Impact of Tourism in The Appalachian Region of Ohio. June 2016

Economic Impacts of Campgrounds in New York State

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2015

Economic Impact of Tourism. Norfolk

THEPEGASUS VIEW. second quarter Global Online Hotel Bookings and Rates Experience Highest Year-on-year Growth in Last 12 Months

THE ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF TOURISM AND NATURE TOURISM IN CORPUS CHRISTI 2012 UPDATE

Comparative Approach of Romania-Croatia in Terms of Touristic Services

PREMIUM TRAFFIC MONITOR JANUARY 2013 KEY POINTS

Note: These Louisiana indicators show the percentage difference from Second Quarter 2004 to Second Quarter 2005.

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Guam. Tourism Satellite Account Calendar Year 2016

Mid-Atlantic Tourism in 2030: Growth, Evolution and Challenges

Dan Mishell. Director of Research Visit California

Visit Wales Research Update

2015 SAN DIEGO VISITOR PROFILE

HIA-RP Data Residential Land Report

2.1m visits made by Day Visitors to the park area in Total Visitor Numbers increased by 14%

Revenue Per Available Room for Hawai i Hotels Grew 5.5 Percent in November Hotel Occupancy and Average Daily Rate Also Increased Year-Over-Year

Nevada Gaming Statistics: July Comparison Executive Summary of 10-Year Revenue and Handle Trends

CTO PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2005 CARIBBEAN TOURISM PERFORMANCE

Colorado Travel Impacts

Atlantic City Tourism Performance Indicators (AC-TPI) th Quarter

1. Hotel Trends Occupancy Rate

Song Rui Tourism Research Center, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences March 7, 2018, Berlin

Do Scenic Amenities Foster Economic Growth in Rural Areas?

Colorado Travel Impacts p

Thank you for participating in the financial results for fiscal 2014.

Petrofin Research Greek fleet statistics

MARKET INSIGHTS UPDATE North America

Winter Statewide Pulse

SAN DIEGO TOURISM TRENDS. Blank No Tag

Introduction 3. Accommodation 4. Ireland Market 5. Activity Providers, Attractions, Retail and Transport 6. Overseas Market Performance 7.

Transcription:

Tourism Report Spring A Report Prepared by the Sonoma County Economic Development Board Ben Stone, Director

Though long renowned for its picturesque scenery, Sonoma County has steadily gained recognition for many other features, ranging from expansive vineyards and fine restaurants to quaint bed-andbreakfasts. Indeed, tourists have the opportunity to choose from a wide array of activities during their stay in Sonoma County. While the majority of visitors flock to Sonoma County for its food and wine, many tourists also take advantage of nature exploration, adventure sports, and cultural events. In recent years, a strong economy and coordinated marketing approach have helped to produce substantial growth levels in Sonoma County s tourism sector. However, recent circumstances economic recession, terrorism-related travel concerns, and United Airlines departure from the local airport have all contributed to an industry downturn. Accordingly, the Sonoma County Economic Development Board (EDB) conducted the 1- Tourism Sector Report to analyze the dynamic changes in the local tourism industry. The majority of the survey was conducted before September 1 and therefore may not adequately capture the effects of recession or other factors in the current industry downturn. The report does, on the other hand, illustrate the economic impact of Sonoma County s relatively strong tourism sector, from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective. The first section provides an economic synopsis of the local tourism industry, including research and information from the California Division of Tourism, Economy.com, D.K. Shifflet & Associates, Dean Runyan Associates, Smith Travel Research, and the Sonoma County Tourism Program. The second section examines the results of the EDB's 1 Tourism Survey. As a qualitative approach, this section details some expected future trends in the Sonoma County tourism industry, and makes recommendations for its continued prosperity. With Sonoma County s widely successful marketing efforts through the Tourism Program, the region s tourism sector has experienced significant growth in the past few years, including the following highlights: 1.5% increase in visitor spending (1998-) 1.% increase in industry payroll (1998-) 3.5% increase in TOT revenues (1998-1) However, as recession and other concerns continue to weigh on the minds of travelers, there is clearly much to be accomplished. We hope this information will help local businesses, government agencies, and other interested parties better understand the dynamics of the rapidly changing tourism sector. Ben Stone S:\EDB\PROJECTS\Tourism1\Report Intro Letter.doc

SECTION I ECONOMIC INDICATORS

E D B Sonoma County Tourism Indicators Report Spring Destination Spending From accommodations to wine tasting, tourists visiting Sonoma County spend money on a variety of activities and attractions. In fact, destination spending, the annual amount of money spent by tourists in Sonoma County, totaled more than $918 million in, a 7.1% increase in tourist expenditures from 1999. Destination spending in the State of California, by comparison, totaled an estimated $66 billion in. 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 Destination Spending in Sonoma County 1997 1998 1999 % Growth Rate 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 Destination Spending Growth Rates in Sonoma County 1996 1997 1998 1999 As the adjacent chart illustrates, growth rates for destination spending in Sonoma County have steadily increased during recent years, averaging 7.% annual growth during 1998-. Destination spending in California, by comparison, grew at a slightly faster average annual rate of 8.% during 1998-. With adverse impacts from both the current recession and travel security concerns, figures for 1 will most likely show a measurable decline in destination spending on both local and statewide levels. However, with world class wineries and a beautiful natural landscape, tourism in Sonoma County should be poised for a healthy recovery when economic prosperity returns. Data Sources: California Travel Impacts, 199- by the California Travel & Tourism Commission & the Division of Tourism, California Trade & Commerce Agency Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board

Employment Generated by Travel Spending in Sonoma County Earnings Generated by Travel Spending in Sonoma County Thousands of Jobs 15.6 15. 15. 15 1.8 1.6 1. 1. 1 1996 1997 1998 1999 Local Economic Impact Travel spending in Sonoma County registers a significant impact on the local economy, generating both employment positions and a substantial annual payroll. As the above graphs illustrate, travel spending in Sonoma County generated more than 15, jobs and more than $3 million in annual earnings in. While total tourism-related employment experienced a slight decrease from 1999, local earnings generated by travel spending have increased at an average annual pace of 6.1% since 1998. This strong annual performance has kept the local tourism industry among Sonoma County's leading economic sectors during recent years. Travel spending in California, by comparison, generated an estimated 1.1 million jobs and nearly $5 billion in earnings in. Average annual earnings growth during 1998- was 6.8%. 35 3 5 15 1 5 5 35 3 5 15 1 5 1996 1997 1998 1999 Travel Spending by Type of Accommodations in Sonoma County () Hotel, Motel, B&B Private Campground Public Campground Private Home Vacation Home Day Travel % Occupancy Rate 8 77 7 71 68 65 6 59 56 53 5 Occupancy Rates in Sonoma County Occupancy Rates Occupancy rates in Sonoma County suffered a precipitous decline in 1, falling more than 1 percentage points to 65.1% for the year. The problems during 1 for both the local and national tourism industry have been well documented. However, with a 6.7% increase in the number of hotel rooms in Sonoma County last year, a slow rebound could have a significant impact on many local companies. 1997 1998 1999 1 Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board Data Sources: California Travel Impacts, 199- by the California Travel & Tourism Commission & the Division of Tourism, California Trade & Commerce Agency

1998- Supply & Demand for Hotel Rooms in Sonoma County With supply and demand for hotel rooms in Sonoma County displaying strong annual convergence rates during 1998-, revenues for many local companies were growing at a very healthy pace. In fact, as the chart below indicates, hotel room revenue in Sonoma County surpassed $13.5 million in, an unparalleled 31.7% increase from 1999 revenues. Thousands of Rooms 18 16 1 1 1 8 Room Supply Room Demand 1997 1998 1999 1 1 1 1 8 6 Hotel Room Revenue in Sonoma County 1997 1998 1999 1 Hotel Room Rates Hotel room rates in Sonoma County remained relatively stable in 1, increasing to $1.8 per night from $99.95 in. With conditions of increasing supply and declining demand in the hotel room market last year, lack of movement in prices is hardly surprising. However, as illustrated in the adjacent chart, 1 marked the end of a strong upward movement of hotel room rates in recent years. The average annual growth rate for 1997- was 1.%; the growth rate alone was almost 19%. Rate ($) Data Sources: Smith Travel Research & the Sonoma County Tourism Program 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 1 The record growth for the tourism industry in Sonoma County, of course, ended in 1. Based on local tax revenues generated by room rentals, the first half of 1 displayed a moderate growth rate of slightly more than 9% for hotel revenues compared to the first half of. However, as the recession and security concerns continued to impact business and recreational travel, the decline of hotel revenues significantly accelerated in the second half of 1. Local tax revenues for the third and fourth quarters of 1 showed an estimated 5% decrease in revenues from the previous year; Q revenues dropped more than 11% compared to. Total hotel room revenues were $113.9 million in 1. Hotel Room Rates in Sonoma County 1997 1998 1999 1 Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board 3

Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Sonoma County Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) Transient Occupancy Tax, or TOT, is the local tax revenue generated through the sales of rooms in lodging establishments located in Sonoma County. As the adjacent chart shows, TOT revenues in Sonoma County have displayed significant growth during the past few years. From 1998 to 1, for example, annual TOT revenues increased from $9.77 million to $13.1 million, a 3.5% jump. Despite the volatile conditions for the tourism industry last year, TOT revenues in Sonoma County managed a slim increase, edging up 1% from. On a quarter-to-quarter basis, revenues through the Second Quarter 1 were up 9.% from. However, as expected, Third and Fourth Quarter collections were down.9% from, yielding an annual total of $13.1 million. 1 13 1 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 1 5 8.95 9.77 1.7 13 13.1 1997 1998 1999 1 Sonoma County Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) 1 3.7.38 TOT Distribution With the downturn in the local tourism industry last year, TOT revenues experienced a significant decline. In the Unincorporated County, the drop in tourism activity pushed TOT revenues down to $5.9 million, a 5.8% decline from. By contrast, TOT revenues in the Cities located in Sonoma County generated $7.76 million, a 6.% increase from. 3 1.31 Q1 Q Q3 Q Quarter.75 As the adjacent graph indicates, growth rates in TOT revenues demonstrate a significant amount of variability depending on location. In addition, a myriad of factors might explain the disparity between revenues collected in the Cities and the Unincorporated County. For example, a significant addition in the number of rooms in Sonoma, or an increase in the TOT tax rate in Sebastopol, could have partially accounted for the relatively strong peformance in City TOT revenues in 1. Tourism activity in the State of California, by comparison, generated $3.11 billion in total tax revenue in, including $1.99 billion in sales tax revenue. The growth rate for was 7.6%. % Growth Rate 8 16 1 8 - -8 Growth Rates of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Unincorporated County vs. Cities Unincorporated County Cities 1998 1999 1 Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board Data Source: Sonoma County Tourism Program

Sonoma & Napa: A Comparison Sharing the distinction of comprising California's Wine Country, Sonoma and Napa Counties are joined in both landscape and economy. However, with dynamic changes altering the playing field in the North Bay during the 199s, several notable trends have surfaced in the local hotel industry. The adjacent charts show occupancy rates and hotel room rates for Sonoma and Napa during the past few years. As the upper chart illustrates, Napa County's annual occupancy rate from 1998 to 1 outpaced Sonoma County by an average of 6.8% per year. The occupancy rate in Sonoma County was 65.1% in 1, a 13.5% decline from. Before the downturn, occupancy rates had increased from 69% to 76% during 1998-. The lower chart illustrates the movement of hotel room rates during 1998-1. A trend toward convergence is clearly evident: Sonoma County prices moved from $81.19 to $1.8 per night, a 3.5% increase. Room rates in Napa County, by contrast, decreased 8.%. Millions of Rooms Room Revenue ($Mil) 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1. 1.3 1. 1.1 1 1 13 1 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 % Occupancy Rate Rate ($) 9 85 8 75 7 65 6 19 17 15 13 11 Supply & Demand for Hotel Rooms in Sonoma County Demand Supply 1998 1999 1 Hotel Room Revenues for Sonoma and Napa Counties Sonoma County Data Sources: Smith Travel Research & the Sonoma County Tourism Program 9 7 Napa County 1998 1999 1 Occupancy Rates for Sonoma and Napa Counties Sonoma County Napa County 1998 1999 1 Hotel Room Rates for Sonoma and Napa Counties Sonoma County Napa County 1998 1999 1 Supply & Demand From 1998 to, the supply of hotel rooms in Sonoma County increased from 1.58 million to 1.6 million, with a 1.6% average annual growth rate. With demand increasing at a 6.9% average annual pace, local hoteliers benefited in both rising prices and total revenue. In fact, as the lower chart indicates, hotel room revenue in Sonoma County jumped 31.7% in alone, raising total revenues to more than $13 million. As a result of this strong growth, in 1 hotel room revenues in Sonoma County surpassed Napa County for the first time in recent history. Conditions of growing supply and shrinking demand for Sonoma County hotel rooms in 1 might cause problems for revenue growth in the absence of a strong recovery in. However, the variety of hotel options in Sonoma County, including a healthy mix of business class and highend B&B establishments, should keep the local industry competitive with Napa County. Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board 5

Destination Spending Destination spending in the North Bay increased at a rapid pace between 1997 and, generating a combined average annual growth rate of 7.%, which virtually matched the statewide rate of 7.6%. As the adjacent chart indicates, Sonoma County has clearly led the way in recent years. From 1997 to, destination spending in Sonoma County jumped from $751.8 million to $918.1 million, an increase of more than %. Marin, Napa, and Sonoma Counties generated $.6 billion in destination spending in. Data for 1 is not yet available. 1 9 8 7 6 5 3 Destination Spending in Marin, Napa, & Sonoma Counties Marin Napa Sonoma 1997 1998 1999 Employment Thousands of Jobs 18 16 1 1 1 8 6 Total Employment Generated by Travel Spending in Marin, Napa, & Sonoma Counties Marin Napa Sonoma 1997 1998 1999 Retail Sales* Total employment generated by travel spending in the North Bay, by contrast, has slightly declined in recent years. From 1997 to, total employment decreased from 3,3 to 3,, a -.8% growth rate for the region. Indeed, despite the record overall performance for the local tourism industry in, both Napa and Sonoma Counties experienced a decline in the number of jobs generated by travel spending: Sonoma County recorded a -1.5% growth rate; Napa County registered a -3.3% growth rate. Marin County, by contrast, added 6 jobs in, a.8% growth rate. 1 figures are not yet available. As expected, retail sales generated by travel spending in the North Bay have mirrored the strong growth rates that typified the increases in overall destination spending between 1997 and. Sonoma County has also led the way in this measure of tourist activity, generating $16.5 million in retail sales during. Of the three counties, Marin County registered the highest average annual growth rate (8.%). Total retail sales in Marin, Napa, and Sonoma Counties were $89.8 million in. 1 data is not yet available. *Groceries and alcohol sales not included 35 15 195 175 155 135 115 95 75 Travel Spending on Retail Goods in Marin, Napa, & Sonoma Counties Marin Napa Sonoma 1997 1998 1999 Data Source: Dean Runyan Associates Copyright Sonoma County Economic Development Board 6