Spadina Avenue which would include two new underground stations located at Yonge Street and at University Avenue.

Similar documents
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

WORKING WITH BIAS ON TTC PROJECTS

MEETING DATE: February 17, 2010 SUBJECT: ACTION ITEM TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. ACCESSIBLE TRANSIT SERVICES PLAN: 2009 STATUS REPORT

9 VIVA DIRECT UNDERGROUND CONNECTION TO THE TORONTO-YORK SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION AT THE VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE

Review of Overnight Services. January 2005

Construction Staging Area Blue Jays Way (357 King Street West)

Bloor Street West Rezoning Application for a Temporary Use By-law Final Report

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 25, 2011

Gold Coast. Rapid Transit. Chapter content. Chapter four Route selection and staging

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. SUBJECT: TORONTO-YORK SPADINA SUBWAY EXTENSION STATION NAMES IN THE CITY OF VAUGHAN

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

3. COLTA / HUGA CONNECTIONS - PRELIMINARY

Design Meeting Presentation

4 YORK REGION TRANSIT DON MILLS SUBWAY STATION ACCESS AGREEMENT

Proposed Bicycle Lanes on Yonge Street from Queens Quay to Front Street

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Temporary Traffic By-law Amendments for High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes (Supplementary Report)

KING STREET PILOT STUDY PUBLIC MEETING

Pedestrian Safety Review Spadina Avenue

95 KING STREET EAST, TORONTO

Old New Old New Old New M-F Saturday Sunday

1 SUBWAY EXTENSION TO VAUGHAN CORPORATE CENTRE - OPERATING AGREEMENT UPDATE

Consolidated By-law Index City Council Meeting March 31 and April 1, 2010

HIPPOS FACE-OFF IN TORONTO TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA SEPT , 2010

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Request to Improve Transit along the Dufferin Street Corridor

95 KING STREET EAST, TORONTO

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

12, 14 and 16 York Street - Amendments to Section 16 Agreement and Road Closure Authorization

NTARIO S INFR STRUCTURE

Sheraton Centre Toronto Hotel Motor Court - Relocation of Taxi Facilities

Northwest Triangle. Redevelopment Proposal. Property Acquisition, Engineering, and Demolition. December, 2005 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (WORKING SESSION) APRIL 19, 2011 YORK REGION RAPID TRANSIT HIGHWAY 7 BUS RAPID TRANSIT- VMC STATION WARD 4.

Construction Staging Adelaide Street West

Parking Amendments - Bay Street, between Harbour Street and Queens Quay West (York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street Ramp Removal)

Disposition of Spadina Expressway Properties - Memorandum of Understanding with Infrastructure Ontario

M-F. Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old New Miscellaneous Changes

SECTION 106 ACTIVITIES ANNUAL REPORT

Site, Situation and Settlement

2015 Volunteer Orientation Package

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Open Report on behalf of Richard Wills, Executive Director for Environment and Economy

TORONTO EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING No. 8

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Status Update

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dundas Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

York Region Rapid Transit Corporation. City of Vaughan Committee of the Whole June 1, 2016

CITY CLERK. Appointments to the Downtown Yonge Street Business Improvement Area Board of Management (Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale)

CITY CLERK TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL REPORT 1. For Consideration by The Council of the City of Toronto on February 1, 2 and 3, 2005

Finchley and Golders Green Area Committee 27 April 2017

Capacity Improvements on Bus and Subway Services

THE AIRTRAIN AIRPORT ACCESS SYSTEM JOHN F. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT ACCESS SERVICE

GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP CELEBRATES LAUNCH OF ZÜM BUS RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE IN BRAMPTON

Wellesley Station Second Exit and Automatic Entrance Public Open House. Tuesday, September 23, 2014 Central YMCA 20 Grosvenor Street

LESLIE BARNS & CONNECTION TRACK. Project Update Construction and Traffic Management Consultation

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Improving Directional Signage for TTC Services at Pearson Airport

Attachment 1: Revitalizing Yonge Downtown Yonge Street

ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE FROM PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Metrolinx Projects: Temporary Delegation for Long- Term Road Closures

DENISON STREET EXTENSION. Transportation Committee. January 14, Feasibility Study

FEDERAL BUDGET PRIORITIES FOR THE SOUTH WEST METROPOLITAN REGION 2018 TO 2022

Expropriation of a portion of 5795 Yonge Street for public street purposes. Government Management Committee

CITY CLERK TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL REPORT 5. For Consideration by The Council of the City of Toronto on June 27, 28 and 29, 2006

EXHIBITOR MANUAL 2012 Conference

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Alternative Highest & Best Use Analysis Boutique Hotel

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

4. Safety Concerns Potential Short and Medium-Term Improvements

THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW (HOUNSLOW HIGH STREET QUARTER) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2015 THE LONDON BOROUGH OF HOUNSLOW

TORONTO AND EAST YORK COMMUNITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING 5

Union Station Queens Quay Transit Link Study

Spadina Avenue Built Form Study Preliminary Report

Joe Halstead, Commissioner Economic Development, Culture and Tourism

CITY CLERK. Toronto-Rochester Fast Ferry - Project Update (Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth)

Report for Action. Events of January 30, 2018 on Line 1. Summary. Date: February 15, 2018 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer

Macleod Trail Corridor Study. Welcome. Macleod Trail Corridor Study Open House. Presentation of Proposed Design Concepts

Construction Staging Area 197 Redpath Avenue

NFTA Access Enhancement Study for Canalside and Cobblestone Alternatives Discussion. Alternative A South Park Avenue

CONTENTS. 1 Introduction Always Moving Forward while Building on the Past A Dynamic Destination... 5

INFORMATION ONLY. Subject: Metrolinx Presentation Date: June 22, 2015

KING STREET TRANSIT PILOT

MILLIKEN. SmartTrack station area profile. 9,300 existing daily TTC surface transit ridership at station location. Low. High MILLIKEN STATION

SERVICE SUMMARY Introduction

YORK UNIVERSITY BUSWAY SERVICE CHANGES

A travel description of the Brisbane Airport Domestic Terminal Precinct. Author: Mr Terry Boyle of the Tactual Mapping Committee (September 2013)

Dufferin Jog Elimination Project

This report recommends two new TTC transit services in southwest Toronto.

Appendix H: North Corridor Alternatives Through Western University - July 2017

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

4 VIVA PHASE 2 YONGE STREET - Y2, AND HIGHWAY 7 - H3 CORRIDORS PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING UPDATE

Service Summary February 18, 2018 to March 31, Data compiled by the Strategy and Service Planning Department

PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 22(7) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended

York Region Rapid Transit Corporation Board of Directors. Mary-Frances Turner, President

Transcription:

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT No S7 MEETING DATE June 4, 1968 FROM: General Manager Subway Construction Date June 3, 1968 Subject: QUEEN STREET SUBWAY FOR STREETCAR OPERATION The Commission, at its meeting of February 8, 1966, approved advising the City of Toronto that it was prepared to co-operate in the study of a "transit facility in the downtown section of Queen Street" and approved advising the Metropolitan Council that the Commission proposes to undertake this study at a cost of $30,000.00, it being understood that the cost involved would form part of the capital cost of the project when approved. The General Secretary transmitted the above approval of the Commission to the City Clerk in a letter dated February 22, 1966, a copy of which is attached. In a letter dated November 2, 1966, a copy of which is attached, the Commission was advised by the Metropolitan Clerk that Metropolitan Council had adopted Clause No. 2 of Report No. 16 of the Transportation Committee, headed "Proposed Queen Street Subway", as amended. The recommendation of Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "It is recommended that the Metropolitan Council formally request the Toronto Transit Commission to complete their study of the physical aspects of the Queen Street tunnel as outlined in the Commission's letter of February 22, 1966, on the understanding that the required expenditure of $30,000.00 will form part of the capital cost of the project." The amendment to Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "The matter of the Queen Street tunnel being considered in relation to the question of the Queen-Greenwood Subway." In accordance with all the foregoing, plans were developed for a "transit facility in the downtown section on Queen Street", and in addition to this a preliminary examination was made of the downtown section in relation to it becoming part of the Queen-Greenwood Subway. These plans were the subject of considerable study at that time and are now submitted for the information of the Commission. A transit facility on Queen Street could be built as shown on these plans and described in the attached Appendix A for the operation of Queen streetcars underground from a portal just West of Sherbourne Street to a portal just East of

Spadina Avenue which would include two new underground stations located at Yonge Street and at University Avenue. The cost of constructing this section of subway is estimated to be $37,000,000, exclusive of right-of-way. Although difficulties would be involved, this transit facility could be extended and converted to a full subway on Queen Street. While the downtown streetcar subway would permit the Queen streetcars to operate on a private right-of-way through the congested downtown section, it has been pointed out by the General Manager of Operations that it would not substantially increase the capacity of the line and that it "is extremely unlikely that the streetcar service on King and Queen Streets will be adequate for future needs". It is also pointed out that there would be "important operating problems to be solved in the changeover between an underground streetcar line and a full subway". It is suggested by the General Manager of Operations that "when improved transit facilities are provided on Queen Street that they should not be in the form of a downtown underground streetcar tunnel but instead should be a full subway, extending from about Donlands Station on the Bloor- Danforth Subway to the Roncesvalles area." QUEEN STREET RAPID TRANSIT SUBWAY Four alignments for a Queen Street Subway from Donlands Station on the Bloor-Danforth Subway, to the Roncesvalles area were studied as follows:- a) An alignment South of Queen Street was examined but rejected as it would involve traffic complications for the major bus feeder services originating on the North side of Queen Street. A review of properties along the South side of Queen Street revealed that excessive underpinning and demolition would be involved. b) Tunnel alignment directly under Queen Street, as shown on Drawing No. 037-G-30, would involve a cut and cover type of construction and consequent disturbance to traffic. The maintenance of streetcar operation during the construction period would create a major problem. The possibility of tunnelling under Queen Street could be investigated but soil conditions in this area appear to be more favourable to cut and cover construction. Because of continuing improvements in methods of tunnelling in soft rock, there is the possibility of

adopting this type of construction and this would be investigated. c) A widened street alignment, as shown on Drawing No. 037-G-31, is included as it was one of the early proposals for the Queen Street Subway and since that time there have been indications in various planning reports of redevelopment along Queen Street. This alignment could be accomplished without interruption to streetcar operation and with reduced congestion of vehicular traffic as the work of subway construction could be confined to the North side of the widened street. d) An alignment parallel to Queen Street and at the rear of the properties on the North side of the street, as shown on Drawing No. 037-G-32, would have the advantage of less disturbance to traffic and could provide for the accommodation of off-street looping facilities for surface bus routes. It would, however, involve the acquisition and demolition of a considerable number of buildings. It is to be noted that the staff of Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board have recently completed a report on rapid transit priorities for Metropolitan Toronto - 1968. The report recommends, "further study of Queen Street Subway extending from an easterly terminal on Greenwood Avenue and O'Connor Drive, South on Greenwood to Queen Street, West on Queen Street to the Weston rail line at Dufferin Street, and from that point in a North-Western direction on the rail line to a Western point at about Islington Avenue." The most desirable location of terminals for a Queen Street Subway would, of course, involve considerable study, but for the purposes of this preliminary investigation the line was extended from Dufferin Street to a terminal at Roncesvalles Avenue. The Easterly terminal was established just north of Bloor and East of Greenwood Avenue at Donlands Station. This terminal location would permit a transfer of passengers from the Bloor-Danforth Subway to the Queen Subway at Donlands Station, and with an alignment on the West side of Greenwood Yard, it would be possible to make connection with the Yard for storage and maintenance of rolling stock to be operated on the Queen Subway. It is to be noted that the plans as submitted make no provision for storage and maintenance of rolling stock, it being understood that the Queen Subway equipment would be maintained and stored at Greenwood Yard. In this event, and with the development of traffic on Bloor Street, it might be necessary to provide another storage facility on the Bloor-Danforth Subway.

ESTIMATES OF COST OF QUEEN SUBWAY It is not possible to estimate the cost of the Queen Subway with any degree of accuracy without undertaking more engineering studies than have been authorized to date. As indicated above the locations of the terminals have not been established and this decision would have a significant effect on the length and cost of the project. The length of the line as shown on the Drawings submitted is about 7¾ miles. If the westerly terminal were located at Dufferin Street as suggested in the Metropolitan Toronto Report, the length would be reduced to about 6½ miles. For preliminary discussion purposes, the estimated cost of the subway on Queen Street would probably vary between $150,000,000 and $200,000,000, depending upon the length of the line and the cost of providing storage for rolling stock. RECOMMENDATION Having regard to all of the foregoing it is recommended that Metropolitan Toronto be advised as follows:- 1. That a short section of the subway on Queen Street from Sherbourne Street to Spadina, designed to be operated initially by streetcars but for ultimate operation by rapid transit could be constructed at a cost of $37,000,000. 2. That this short section of subway will not materially increase the capacity of the Queen Street car line which is considered to be inadequate for future traffic on Queen Street. 3. That further consideration should be given to the preparation of a preliminary report on Queen Street Subway and that this report be prepared by the Commission staff working in co-operation with the staff of Metropolitan Toronto Planning Board with respect to location of route. I concur [signed] J.G. Inglis, General Manager of Operations W.H. Paterson, General Manager Subway Construction

APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF QUEEN STREET SUBWAY FOR STREETCAR OPERATION A subway on Queen Street to accommodate streetcar operations would have an approximate length of 6,850 feet and would require two portals as described below, and two stations: one at Yonge Street and one station at University Avenue. These stations would connect with and be located below the existing subway stations at these locations. PORTALS An entrance and exit portal on the East end of Queen Subway would be just West of Sherbourne Street. This portal would require a widening of Queen Street from its present width of 66 feet to 96 feet in the vicinity of the portal. The widening would extend a distance of approximately 750 feet on the West side of Sherbourne Street to the East side of Jarvis Street and could be accomplished by using a strip of land 30 feet wide on the North side of the street. The lands in this area have been acquired and the buildings demolished to accommodate the Moss Park Development. This widening would permit two lanes of vehicular traffic to pass on each side of the portal located in the centre of Queen Street. An entrance and exit portal on the West end of Queen Subway would be constructed just East of Spadina Avenue where Queen Street has been widened to 96 feet, which would allow for two lanes of vehicular traffic to pass on each side of the portal located in the centre of Queen Street. STATIONS The station plans as submitted indicated high platforms as required for their ultimate use as a Rapid Transit Station. Drawing No. 037-A-17 shows how the station could be built for streetcar operation with provision for later conversion to Rapid Transit type train operation. A station at Yonge Street with side platforms 500 feet in length, as shown on Drawings 037-A-5 and 6, would extend from Yonge Street to just East of Bay Street. Additional escalators on the West side of the present Queen Station on Yonge Street would serve passenger movement from the West side of Yonge Street and the East end of the proposed nev; station. It is also proposed to install escalators and stairs in the West side of the Eaton-Simpson existing passageway to a Queen mezzanine control area and to the proposed new platforms.

Preliminary studies were undertaken by City Planning Authorities with respect to an underground "Mall" or "Promenade" under the Bay-Queen intersection and connecting to building development in that vicinity. In the event of the "Mall" proposal being implemented, it could be connected to the Bay Street control area by both stairways and escalators, as shown on Drawing No. 037-A-6. Access from street level to the "Mall" or "Promenade" would be provided by stairways in the sidewalk (similar to the entrances to the Queen Station east of Yonge Street) or by stairway and escalators in private property, subject to agreement with property owners. Details of such entrances were not developed at that time because of the preliminary nature of the study. Should the "Mall" or "Promenade" proposal not be adopted similar entrances would be required leading as directly as possible from the sidewalks to the passenger control area. It is emphasized that the plans as described in the foregoing are preliminary only but indicate the minimum requirements for transit purposes. These plans would be subject to further study and could be expanded to conform with plans for redevelopment by other authorities. A new station at University Avenue shown on Drawings N03.C37-A-2 and 037-A-3 would be located just East of University Avenue crossing under the existing University Subway. When the University Avenue Subway was built, provision for a future Queen Street Subway was made to the extent of providing piers to support the University Avenue Subway. The present Osgoode Station entrances located on University Avenue would serve both subways from the street surface. However, it would be necessary to install escalators and stairs from the present control area to the Queen Subway platform and from the University platform to the Queen Subway platforms.