FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2010 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

Similar documents
FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2007 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2005 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2013 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, VA

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2015 UPDATE. Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, VA

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY FOR NORTH AMERICA, 2016 UPDATE

PREFACE. Service frequency; Hours of service; Service coverage; Passenger loading; Reliability, and Transit vs. auto travel time.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 22, 2014

Juneau Household Waterfront Opinion Survey

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Tourism in Alberta. A Summary Of Visitor Numbers, Revenue & Characteristics Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd.

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

Proof of Concept Study for a National Database of Air Passenger Survey Data

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2015 Calendar Year Annual Report Canadian Visitors

The Travel and Tourism Industry in Vermont. A Benchmark Study of the Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on the Vermont Economy 2005

VALUE OF TOURISM. Trends from

Ontario Arts and Culture Tourism Profile Executive Summary

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2012 Economic Impact Report

I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. A. Introduction

IMPACTS OF CHANGING USED IMPORT VEHICLE VOLUMES ON AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND VEHICLE FLEET SAFETY

Economic Impact of Tourism in Hillsborough County September 2016

CHAPTER XII: ECONOMIC IMPACT Of the Virginia Coal Heritage Trail

U. S. Hispanic Travelers Report

Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum Visitors Summer 2008 Summary of Findings

IATA ECONOMICS BRIEFING AIRLINE BUSINESS CONFIDENCE INDEX OCTOBER 2010 SURVEY

Washington, DC 2013 Visitor Statistics

2014 NOVEMBER ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND VISITOR PROFILE. Prepared By:

CONGESTION MONITORING THE NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE. By Mike Curran, Manager Strategic Policy, Transit New Zealand

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Oxfordshire Estimates for 2013

2nd Quarter. AEDC is pleased to present the Anchorage Quarterly Economic Indicators Report for the second quarter of 2010.

DOWNTOWN, CHARLOTTE AMALIE

Safety Operations Overview

Forecast of Aviation Activity

2009 Muskoka Airport Economic Impact Study

The Value of Tourism in British Columbia. Measuring the value of tourism in BC 1999 to Trends from 1998 to 2008

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2016 Economic Impact Report

NAPA VALLEY VISITOR INDUSTRY 2014 Economic Impact Report

1999 Reservations Northwest Users Survey Methodology and Results November 1999

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. hospitality compensation as a share of total compensation at. Page 1

HOW TO IMPROVE HIGH-FREQUENCY BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY THROUGH SCHEDULING

Tourism in Alberta. A Summary Of Visitor Numbers, Revenue & Characteristics 2004

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

Tourism Satellite Account STATISTICS NEW ZEALAND DECEMBER 2002

Guernsey Travel Survey

Fundamentals of Airline Markets and Demand Dr. Peter Belobaba

Appendix B Ultimate Airport Capacity and Delay Simulation Modeling Analysis

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The 2001 Economic Impact of Connecticut s Travel and Tourism Industry

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Maine Lakes and Mountains

Denver 2015 Travel Year

2016 VISITOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, DC

2017 VISITOR STATISTICS WASHINGTON, DC

RESEARCH AND PLANNING FORT STEELE HERITAGE TOWN VISITOR STUDY 2007 RESULTS. May 2008

Tourism Kelowna Visitor Intercept Survey Findings FINAL DRAFT REPORT

Oklahoma Health Care Authority

ABSTRACT TIES TO CURRICULUM TIME REQUIREMENT

3 Aviation Demand Forecast

Regional Spread of Inbound Tourism. VisitBritain Research, August 2018

Potomac River Commuter Ferry Feasibility Study & RPE Results

Strong Growth of Online Travel Agencies (OTA) in the Swiss Hotel Industry in 2016

Rail Sta s cs Compendium Great Britain Annual

Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies Interfleet Transport Opinion Survey (TOPS) Quarter 3, September 2011

DATA-DRIVEN STAFFING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWERS

2014 West Virginia Image & Advertising Accountability Research

Guernsey Travel Survey

May 12, 10am-6pm & May 13, 10am-5pm 2018 SPONSORSHIP PROSPECTUS

Visitor Services Project. Colonial National Historical Park

Memorandum. Roger Millar, Secretary of Transportation. Date: April 5, Interstate 90 Operations and Mercer Island Mobility

CAMPER CHARACTERISTICS DIFFER AT PUBLIC AND COMMERCIAL CAMPGROUNDS IN NEW ENGLAND

Interstate 90 and Mercer Island Mobility Study APRIL Commissioned by. Prepared by

Figure 1.1 St. John s Location. 2.0 Overview/Structure

Limited-stop bus service: An evaluation of an implementation strategy

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

International Visitors to New England. DNE Summit 2016 Newport, RI

Impacts of Visitor Spending on the Local Economy: George Washington Birthplace National Monument, 2004

Average annual compensation received by full-time spa employees.

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

Report on Palm Beach County Tourism Fiscal Year 2007/2008 (October 2007 September 2008)

2010 Nova Scotia Visitor Exit Survey Regional Report

AVSP 7 Summer Section 7: Visitor Profile - Demographics and Spending

Civil Aviation, Annual Operating and Financial Statistics, Canadian Air Carriers, Levels I to III

The Economic Impact of Tourism Brighton & Hove Prepared by: Tourism South East Research Unit 40 Chamberlayne Road Eastleigh Hampshire SO50 5JH

Economic Impacts of Aviation: Catalytic Impacts Dr. Michael W Tretheway Chief Economist, InterVISTAS Consulting Group ACED Conference

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Statewide Nevada Table Mix

A. CONCLUSIONS OF THE FGEIS

R. J. Adams Advanced Aviation Concepts ELECTE f10356 Sandy Run Road APR Jupiter, Florida R. D. Smith. February 1992.

ARRIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSENGERS INTENDING TO USE PUBLIC TRANSPORT

2014 North Carolina Image & Advertising Accountability Research

National Passenger Survey Spring putting rail passengers first

Tourism in the Caribbean Netherlands in 2017

Building Completion. Statistics Second Quarter. Building Completion Statistics I Second Quarter 2012

The second change is that the ball needs to remain in contact with the track at all times.

Cruise Pulse TM Travel Agent Panel Survey. Wave Season Kick-off Edition

Corporate Productivity Case Study

Portrait of American Traveler. November 16, 2016

The Economic Impact of Tourism on Scarborough District 2014

Transcription:

FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2010 UPDATE Prepared for International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions Alexandria, Virginia by National Safety Council Research and Statistical Services Group Itasca, Illinois Revised December 2011 Injury Survey, 2010 Update - 1 -

Preface This report presents the results of work done by the National Safety Council, Research and Statistical Services Group, under contract to the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions. It includes estimates by the Council for calendar years 2003 through 2010. The Council s work is an extension of, but independent of, the estimates made for 2001-2002 by Heiden Associates, which are included here for reference and reported more fully in the June/July 2003 issue of Injury Insights (Heiden & McGonegal, 2003). FIXED-SITE AMUSEMENT RIDE INJURY SURVEY, 2010 UPDATE Since 2001 the International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions (IAAPA) has sponsored an annual survey to collect and analyze ride, attendance, and patron injury data from facilities that operate fixed-site amusement rides. The IAAPA survey was undertaken to gain perspective on fixed-site amusement ride injuries in the United States. The surveys include amusement and theme parks, tourist attractions, and family entertainment centers. The results of these surveys are presented below. Facilities were asked to report attendance and ridership as well as the number of patron injuries. Separate attendance-based and ridership-based analyses were performed and are shown in Table 2. To be consistent with the estimates previously reported for 2001-2002, the Survey Highlights are shown in Table 1. Estimated attendance in 2010 was up 4.2% from 2009 and estimated ridership was up about 1.0%. Table 1. Survey Highlights (millions) Ridership (billions) Injuries per Million Number of Year Facilities 2001-2002 459 302.9 --- 2,486 8.2 2003* 403 300.4 1.95 2,044 7.0 2004 403 300.0 1.81 1,637 5.2 2005 398 300.4 1.82 1,783 5.2 2006 395 291.7 1.76 1,797 6.6 2007 395 292.1 1.78 1,664 4.6 2008 422 291.2 1.70 1,523 4.7 2009 398 278.4 1.69 1,181 4.4 2010 386 290.1 1.70 1,299 4.4 Source: 2001-2002, Heiden & McGonegal (2003). 2003-2010, National Safety Council estimates based on fixed-site amusement ride injury surveys. *Changes in the estimating method beginning with 2003 affect comparability with the 2001-2002 survey. Not all facilities were able to report both attendance and ridership and therefore there were differences in the selection of facilities used in each analysis. Table 2 indicates that the ridership-based estimates of ride related injuries compared to attendance-based estimates are 92 lower in 2010 (1,299 vs. 1,207), 95 lower in 2009 (1,181 vs. 1,086), 180 lower in 2008 (1,523 vs. 1,343), 355 lower in 2007 (1,664 vs. 1,309), 251 lower in 2006 (1,797 vs. 1,546), 70 lower in 2005 (1,713 vs. 1,783), 11 higher in 2004 (1,648 vs. 1,637), and 90 lower in 2003 (1,954 vs. 2,044). The changes in exposure noted above had a corresponding affect on the resulting injury estimates. Nevertheless, the distributions of injuries by ride type and severity obtained from the ridership-based estimates were very similar to the distributions obtained from the attendance-based estimates for total injuries and other injuries. However, the distributions of injuries by ride type varied somewhat for serious injuries, with the attendance-based estimates showing a higher portion of injuries on children s rides, a lower portion on family and adult rides, and a slightly lower portion on roller coasters compared to the ridership-based estimates. Injury Survey, 2010 Update - 2 -

Table 2. -Based vs. Ridership-Based Injury Estimates, 2003-2010 -Based Ridership-Based Year Patron-Rides 2003 2,044 7.0 1,954 1.0 2004 1,637 5.2 1,648 0.9 2005 1,783 5.2 1,713 0.9 2006 1,797 6.6 1,546 0.9 2007 1,664 4.6 1,309 0.7 2008 1,523 4.7 1,343 0.8 2009 1,181 4.4 1,086 0.6 2010 1,299 4.4 1,207 0.7 Ridership is a better measure of exposure to risk than attendance because injuries on rides are the outcome of interest. Parks with similar attendance may have much different ridership numbers because of differences in the number and kinds of amusement rides provided. The results reported below are based on the ridership analysis, which is shown in Table 3. This analysis provides additional results that were not available from the 2001-2002 survey. The estimated injury total was up 11.1% in 2010 compared to 2009 (1,207 vs. 1,086). The rate of injuries per million patron-rides increased 10.9% in 2010 compared to 2009 (0.71 vs. 0.64). Compared to 2003, both the estimated number of injuries and the rate in 2010 were down by 38.2% and 30.0%, respectively. As shown in Figure 1, over half (54.0%) of the injuries in 2010 occurred on family and adult rides compared to a slightly lower 52.1% in 2009 and slightly higher portions of 61.6% and 58.0% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The overall number of injuries on family and adult rides in 2010 was down 15.4% compared to 2009. Roller coasters accounted for 35.9% of the injuries in 2010 more than in any other year except for 2004. The overall number of injuries on roller coasters in 2010 was up 15.5% from 2009. After increasing nearly 5% from 2008 to 2009, the proportion of injuries associated with children s rides declined over 3% from 2009 to 2010. Unlike the increases observed for family and adult rides and roller coasters, the overall number of injuries on children s rides decreased 15.9% from 2009 to 2010. Figure 1. Proportion By Ride Type, U.S., 2003-2010 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Roller Coasters Family & Adult Rides Children's Rides Injury Survey, 2010 Update - 3 -

In 2010, the injury rate for family and adult rides was 0.6 per million patron-rides, compared to 1.0 for roller coasters and 0.5 for children s rides. The difference between the injury rate for children s rides and roller coasters is statistically significant, as is the difference between the family and adult and roller coaster injury rates. The difference between the injury rate for children s rides and family and adult rides was not significant. About 5% of the injuries were reported to be serious, meaning an injury resulting in immediate admission and hospitalization in excess of 24 hours for purposes other than medical observation. The remaining 95% were other than serious. The proportion of injuries that were serious in 2010 was down 18.3% from the proportion in 2009 and was lower than for every other year except for 2007, when the portion was 2.7%. The rate of serious injuries per million patron-rides was 0.03 in 2010 down from 0.04 in 2009 and 0.05 in 2008, up slightly from 0.02 in 2007, and down from 0.1 for each of the previous four years. Table 3. Summary of Estimated Fixed-Site Amusement Ride-, U.S., 2003-2010 (based on ridership) Ride Type Injury Severity Year Characteristic Total Children s Rides Family and Adult Rides Roller Coasters Total Serious Injuries Other Reportable Injuries 1,954 277 1,173 504 1,954 106 1,848 2003 Percent 100.0% 14.2 60.1 25.8 100.0% 5.4 94.6 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 1.0 1,648 219 806 613 1,648 132 1,516 2004 Percent 100.0% 13.3 49.5 37.2 100.0% 8.0 92.0 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.8 1,713 192 1,131 390 1,713 132 1,582 2005 Percent 100.0% 11.2 66.0 22.8 100.0% 7.7 92.3 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.9 1,546 177 943 426 1,546 135 1,411 2006 Percent 100.0% 11.4 61.0 27.6 100.0% 8.7 91.3 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.1 0.8 1,309 134 759 416 1,309 35 1,274 2007 Percent 100.0% 10.2 58.0 31.8 100.0% 2.7 97.3 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.02 0.7 1,343 117 827 399 1,343 80 1,264 2008 Percent 100.0% 8.7 61.5 29.7 100.0% 5.9 94.1 0.8 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.05 0.7 1,086 145 565 375 1,086 65 1,021 2009 Percent 100.0% 13.4 52.1 34.5 100.0% 6.0 94.0 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.04 0.6 1,207 122 652 433 1,207 59 1,148 2010 Percent 100.0% 10.1 54.0 35.9 100.0% 4.9 95.1 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.03 0.7 Note: Totals may not equal sum of parts due to rounding. Injury Survey, 2010 Update - 4 -

Survey Response Of the 386 eligible facilities with rides in 2010, a total of 134 provided some or all of the data requested (27 provided attendance data only, 19 provided ridership data only, 81 provided both attendance and ridership data, and 7 provided injury data only). The respondents used in the analyses represented about 64.4% of the estimated total annual attendance and 65.0% of the estimated total rides taken at all facilities. Data from 104 facilities were used for the 2010 attendance-based estimates compared to 113 for 2009, 153 for 2008, 125 for 2007, 124 for 2006, 117 for 2005 and 124 for 2004. Data from 96 facilities were used for the 2010 ridershipbased estimates compared to 105 for 2009, 134 for 2008, 104 for 2007, 97 for 2006, 90 for 2005 and 99 for 2004. It was impractical to find a single set of facilities that reported all data (attendance, ridership, and injuries) for all years as that would have reduced the reliability of the estimates. 2003-2010 Methodology The National Safety Council conducted the survey using a master list of amusement/theme parks, family entertainment centers, and tourist attractions thought to have fixed-site rides. The master list was prepared in consultation with IAAPA and Amusement Industry Consulting, Inc. The survey consisted of a notification letter, a package of reporting information mailed one week later, and a follow-up postcard mailed one week after the reporting package. After the mailings, IAAPA volunteers made follow-up telephone calls and sent e-mails to IAAPA member facilities and some nonmember facilities. Injury rates based on the reporting facilities were used to estimate national totals. (See also Survey Response above.) 2001-2002 Methodology In 2001 and 2002 IAAPA mailed survey questionnaires to members previously identified as having fixed-site amusement rides. IAAPA retained Heiden Associates, Washington, DC, to analyze the survey results. Using the IAAPA survey results and other data, Heiden Associates estimated the number of U.S. facilities with one or more fixed-site amusement rides and the injury totals and rates. References Heiden, E.J., & McGonegal, S. (2003). 2001-2002 fixed-site amusement ride injury survey analysis. Injury Insights, June/July 2003. Injury Survey, 2010 Update - 5 -