Table of Contents Foreword by Victor Schoenmakers, Chairman of ESPO 5 1. Port Governance 7 2. Intermodal Transport and Logistics 9 3. Sustainable Development 11 4. Marine Affairs and Security 15 5. Economic Analysis and Statistics 17 6. Passengers 19 7. Overview of ESPO Activities in the Period 2010-2011 20 8. ESPO Structure and Membership 21 9. Market Developments in Figures 30
Smart cities and regions need intelligent ports. Luís Valente de Oliveira, European Coordinator for Motorways of the Sea P 4
Foreword Ports are more than ever on the European maps. The new policy framework for the Trans-European Transport Networks does this in the most literal sense, both as comprehensive and core network. Ports are generally expected to play a key role in meeting the ambitious objectives of the European Commission s Transport Policy White Paper. And, yes, a new ports package is in the making, which will revive some of the well-known regulatory issues we dealt with a few years ago. We have quite a few challenges ahead therefore and I am happy that we have with ESPO a strong organisation that will be able to provide a clear response on behalf of the sector. The time and resources we invested in the past years in developing our network and know-how, be it in the field of port performance, governance or sustainability, will now come in very handy. We owe a lot of this to the efforts of our Technical Committees, which form the backbone of the ESPO structure. They constitute a formidable network of port professionals that all contribute on a voluntary basis to our work, despite the very busy schedules they have in their own ports. I would like to thank them, and the Committee chairmen, for the sense of community they relentlessly demonstrate. The foundations of any organisation are its members, and I think we should do even more in ESPO to reach out to all those individual ports out there. A daunting task given the sheer number of them, but one we should not shy away from. It is essential if we want to continue taking a united, credible and constructive stance on behalf of that great community of European ports that we represent. Victor Schoenmakers Chairman of ESPO P 5
Most European port authorities have renaissance ambitions, but the diversity in governance frameworks either limits or enables those. ESPO Port Governance Fact-Finding Report
1. Port Governance The European Commission s new Transport Policy White Paper announced a review of European ports policy, with a particular focus on restrictions existing in the market of port services. In September this year, Commission Vice-President Siim Kallas confirmed the aim to design a new ports package by the beginning of 2013 which would essentially look at administrative simplification, market access and financial transparency. The preparation of the package would be accompanied by a consultation of stakeholders. In its initial response, ESPO first of all expressed its willingness to constructively contribute to the process. For ESPO, the Ports Policy Communication that followed the withdrawal of the Port Services Directive still forms a good framework for action. The main added value of a new ports package would lie in elaborating certain parts of that Communication, notably where it concerns enhancing the level playing field, creating greater transparency and striking a balance between investment continuity and market openness. In that respect, ESPO continues to favour non-legislative measures and instruments. These match better with the diversity of European ports and would be proportional to the already competitive nature of the ports industry. Clear guidance will help responsible governments, port authorities and service providers to function within the European framework. Meanwhile, the Commission has already started a number of preparatory studies, notably on dock labour, technical-nautical services (in particular pilotage exemption certificates) and State aid. The latter study is being carried out on behalf of DG Competition. The results of these studies are expected for spring 2012. Finally, the long-announced social dialogue on ports is also expected to take off in the near future. The formal request to set up the sectoral dialogue has been sent to the European Commission early 2011 and the Commission responded with a request for information to verify the representativeness of the parties concerned. During the past year, ESPO had a number of consultative meetings with the services of DG Markt on their initiative to create a new horizontal instrument on service concessions and its application to the port sector. It is a fact that contractual relationships between port authorities and terminal operators in Europe are varied in nature. Rather than getting in a legalistic dispute about the definition of concessions, ESPO prefers to follow the principle that fairness and transparency obligations must always apply when port authorities decide to entrust a third party with a portion of port land for the provision of cargo-handling services. In this context, ESPO believes first of all that the pragmatic approach taken in the Ports Policy Communication should continue to prevail. It recognises the discretionary powers of port authorities in setting selection criteria and specifies that transparency obligations must only apply where they matter, i.e. in case there is a sufficient connection with the functioning of the internal market. Secondly, ESPO agrees that incumbent terminal operators should not have an unconditional and automatic right of prolongation. Contract durations have to be limited and proportional to depreciation, allowing a reasonable return on investment, but maintaining at the same time a risk inherent in exploitation. However, ESPO believes that if an incumbent operator is performing well and commits itself to continued investments, there should be scope for prolonging its agreement with the port authority. ESPO concretely recommends that prolongation options should be anticipated in the original agreement and that arbitrary modifications should be avoided. In May this year, ESPO published a new version of its Fact-Finding Report on port governance. The report was based on an extensive survey among port authorities and was presented during the ESPO Annual Conference in Cyprus. The Fact-Finding Report provides an overview of the objectives and functions of European port authorities, their institutional frameworks and financial capabilities. The report clearly demonstrates that most port authorities in Europe essentially see themselves as facilitators, both towards the business community and societal stakeholders. The institutional framework is crucial in enabling port authorities to play this role to the fullest extent. Differences in this respect are mainly regionally determined, with port authorities in southern Europe being typically more limited in their autonomy. Finally, in November 2010, the second ESPO Award on Societal Integration of Ports was given to the Port of Helsinki for its project Port as Part of the City. The port authority was awarded thanks to its determination to maintain port activities in the city centre, thus sustaining the maritime identity of Helsinki. The Jury was also impressed by the port s continuous interactive dialogue with local community stakeholders to achieve this goal and the port authority s investments in shore-side electricity, waste reception facilities and other ways to integrate port activities sustainably within the urban environment. P 7
When a container is transported from Gdansk to Antwerp by lorry, then that container remains within the EU and the goods do not have to be customs-cleared on arrival or departure. However, when you ship the same container from Gdansk to Antwerp, you first have to clear the goods on departure and then again on arrival, as if that container has left the EU. That is to the detriment of coastal transport and I think the Commission is right in wanting to rectify this disadvantage. Dirk Sterckx, former MEP
2. Intermodal Transport and Logistics The beginning of 2011 was marked by the publication of the Commission s Transport Policy White Paper. It consists of a roadmap of 40 concrete initiatives for the next decade to build a competitive transport system that will increase mobility, remove major barriers and stimulate growth and employment. At the same time, the proposals aim to dramatically reduce Europe s dependence on imported oil and cut transport carbon emissions with 60% by 2050. To meet this goal, the Commission wants to achieve a ban on conventionally-fuelled cars in cities, 40% use of sustainable low carbon fuels in aviation, at least 40% cut in shipping emissions and a 50% shift of medium distance intercity passenger and freight journeys from road to rail and waterborne transport. For seaports, the White Paper announces initiatives in the field of infrastructure, services, financing, safety and security. Initiatives for infrastructure concern the integration of ports into the Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T). The Commission expects that the multimodal TEN-T core network will be fully functional by 2030, with a high quality and capacity network by 2050 and a corresponding set of information services. By that time all core seaports should be sufficiently connected to the rail freight network and, where possible, to the inland waterway system. On infrastructure generally, the Commission wants to streamline procedures for projects of overriding European interest in order to ensure reasonable time limits to complete the whole cycle of procedures, to ensure a communication framework that is in line with the project implementation and to foresee integrated planning which takes environmental issues into account in early stages of the planning procedure. As regards modal share, the Commission expects that, for distances over 300 km, 30% of road freight shifts to other modes such as rail or waterborne transport by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050. To facilitate this, the Commission confirmed its ambition to complete the internal market for shipping through the development of a Blue Belt and corresponding Blue Lanes in ports. The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) launched a Blue Belt pilot project in May with the overall objective to facilitate vessel operations on intra-eu trading routes. The pilot project provides local customs authorities with vessel voyage information supplied by the EMSA-operated SafeSeaNet. Upon successful assessment of the pilot project, due at the beginning of 2012, existing procedures may be reviewed and adjusted in favour of a permanent blue belt reporting system. ESPO called for the involvement of port authorities in the project and is contributing to the evaluation of the pilot impact. ESPO expects that the Blue Belt pilot will bring changes to procedures in order to ease administrative burdens for intra-eu trade. The White Paper also outlines a timetable for the internalisation of external costs. In particular, in the longer term (2016 to 2020), the Commission plans measures to internalise costs for local pollution and noise in ports. ESPO believes that a policy framework ensuring that prices applied by service providers reflect all costs, both internal and external, would theoretically favour more environmentally-friendly transport modes such as short-sea shipping, rail and inland navigation. However, pricing is far from being the only factor which determines the choice of a transport mode. A cost-recovery system for externalities for all modes of transport should therefore be integrated in a broader approach, together with the creation of an integrated transport network, administrative simplification and harmonisation and the earmarking of revenues for investment in sustainable infrastructure projects. For ESPO, any initiative leading to increased transport costs should be approached with care and ensure that the result is in the end not counterproductive to Europe s overall competitiveness and more in particular to environmentally friendly transport modes such as waterborne transport. P 9
In February this year, the Commission presented a methodology paper for the planning and implementation of the new TEN-T policy. The paper sets out the basic principles for the development of the comprehensive and core network. In its response to the methodology paper, ESPO reiterated its support for the dual layer approach that the Commission proposed earlier. This approach consists of the priority development of a core infrastructure network that is based on a broad underlying comprehensive network. The core network would be based on a selection of nodal points, of which seaports form an essential component. For ESPO, the selection criteria for ports should allow the core network to be futureoriented and be sufficiently robust to anticipate future needs and trends for the next 10 to 20 years. Ports in the core network should have potential for decarbonisation and limitation of external costs. They should also have a gateway function linking the main EU markets with the rest of the world, connect between maritime and land-based networks, be responsive to market needs and be reliable. There needs to be a good spread of core network ports around Europe but, on the other hand, a degree of consolidation is necessary to collect positive economies of scale, also in terms of sustainability. The key challenge in the design of the core network is to find an appropriate balance between these two principles. ESPO sees the review of the TEN-T guidelines also as a good opportunity to review the position of Motorways of the Sea, integrating it as the maritime section of the core network. Motorways of the Sea should no longer be seen as port-to-port connections but as services connecting hinterlands. The actual proposal for the guidelines is expected for October 2011, together with the proposal for the financial framework. Earlier this year, ESPO and EFIP developed a common position paper on EU rail policy, concentrating mainly on the recast of the First Railway Package. The paper identifies the main challenges and concerns European maritime and inland ports are facing today regarding the functioning of European railways. Among these features the improvement of rail links to and from port areas, which should be optimised to guarantee a non discriminatory access for all railway undertakings to the port area. Improving these links is an important element in completing the TEN-T network. Other challenges that need to be addressed relate to the national focus of railways, the lack of demand-driven investments in rail freight infrastructure, the preferential treatment of incumbent undertakings, opaque and unfair pricing regimes and the low reliability levels for non-prescheduled rail freight trains. For ports, there is a clear sense of urgency in achieving a single European railway network which will help guaranteeing an efficient use of existing railway capacity. ESPO and EFIP call for the removal of remaining legal, technical and political barriers without further delay. Prior to the autumn meeting of the Intermodal and Logistics Committee, ESPO organised an internal workshop on EU customs policy. The aim was to identify which role, if any, port authorities can take on the development of E-Customs, the Modernized Customs Code and its implementing provisions and on administrative simplification in general. The workshop also compared views of terminal operators, port community system operators and ship owners. P 10
3. Sustainable Development Since 1 January 2011, EcoPorts officially integrated within the ESPO structure. As from that moment, ESPO has been the party responsible for the management of the EcoPorts network of ports and the dissemination of the well established EcoPorts tools Self Diagnosis Methodology (SDM) and Port Environmental Review System (PERS) within Europe and in neighbouring countries. As a result, the EcoPorts tools are now available to the whole ESPO membership and the trends to date clearly demonstrate an increased interest of ports in joining EcoPorts and using the tools through the new online gateway at www.ecoports.com. The integration of EcoPorts within ESPO aims towards extending the progress achieved by the sector on port environmental management through the guiding principles of ports sharing experiences and voluntary self regulation. In line with the same principles, ESPO is working on updating its Environmental Code of Practice which was last reviewed back in 2003. The new ESPO Green Guide will be re-establishing the vision on sustainability and will be identifying common ways for implementing environmental ambitions. The Guide will be examining the instruments that are commonly available in the disposition of port authorities. The aim is to develop a common approach towards responsible action, without losing sight of the diversity of ports, their competences and their abilities. The main environmental issues that will be addressed within the Guide are: air quality, energy consumption and climate change, noise, waste and water management. The first outcomes of the work were presented by representatives of the ESPO Sustainable Development Committee during the Greenport Congress in Hamburg, which was held in September this year. They were very well received by the participants. The ESPO Green Guide is expected to be published mid 2012. Further in relation to port sector voluntary initiatives, substantial progress has been achieved this year with the Environmental Ship Index (ESI), which is one of the major projects under the World Port Climate Initiative (WPCI) umbrella. Designed by a group of major European ports, and under the coordination of the International Association of Ports and Harbours (IAPH), the index addresses the environmental performance of ships in terms of the emission of major air pollutants (NOx and SOx) and CO2. Ships voluntarily provide their performance data to the ESI website while port authorities voluntarily provide incentives to reward the cleaner ships based on their ESI score. ESPO continues its support and facilitation towards the WPCI projects, endorsing all technical developments and having an informative and disseminative role. Ship exhaust emissions have been high on the political agenda during the course of the year. On 15 July, the European Commission adopted a proposal for amending Directive 1999/32/EC on the sulphur content of marine fuels. The amendment mainly aligns the Directive with the latest IMO provisions, incorporating those in EU law. Under the proposals, the maximum permissible sulphur content of maritime fuels used in sensitive areas (Sulphur Emission Control Areas) will fall from the previous level of 1.5 % to 0.1 %, as of 1 January 2015. Other areas are to achieve a cut from 4.5 % down to 0.5 % by 1 January 2020. Recognising the challenging nature of the new limits and in order to foster sustainable and competitive shipping, the Commission will develop, in 2012, a series of medium and long-term measures within the framework of a Sustainable Waterborne Transport Toolbox. ESPO is following closely the developments in this field and the ongoing political process. P 11
Air pollution does not stop at borders. Land sources have been subject to the attention of regulators for a while, and the time has now come for the maritime sector to deliver its fair share, all the more so as the impacts on air quality are felt far beyond coastal areas. Environment Commissioner Janez PotoČčnik
Also in July, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) adopted mandatory measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from international shipping. The agreement represented the first ever mandatory global GHG reduction regime for an international industry sector. The European Commission congratulated IMO on the adoption of the Energy Efficiency Design Index, however it is not certain whether this may stop unilateral EU action altogether. The Commission has for a while been assessing the impact of regional measures such as mandatory slow steaming through the application of speed limits, the introduction of a bunkering levy, and the introduction of an emission trading scheme in view of fulfilling its international commitments for carbon emissions reduction. The Commission is expected to make a formal recommendation by the end of 2011. In addition, the European Commission presented in April this year a proposal to amend its Directive on taxation of energy products and electricity. ESPO particularly welcomed the provision to exempt shoreside electricity from taxation. Together with the European Shipowners Association ECSA, ESPO had lobbied for such a tax exemption. Finally, in the field of sustainable port development, the Commission s guidelines on the implementation of Birds and Habitats Directives in estuaries and coastal zones were published on 15 March this year. The guidelines make particular reference to port development and dredging and are accompanied by a Commission working paper which places the recommendations in a policy context. ESPO welcomed the publication of the guidelines and the accompanying working paper. In particular, ESPO expressed its satisfaction about the preparatory process, which was based on a constructive dialogue with EC services and stakeholders. P 13
The simplification of administrative procedures for maritime transport is an important step, not only because it will reduce the costs of maritime transport, which is used to deliver almost 40% of goods within the Internal Market, but also because maritime transport is a cleaner and safer form of transport Siim Kallas, Commission Vice-President responsible for transport
4. Marine Affairs and Security The long pending process of reviewing Directive 2000/59/EC which regulates the provision and use of port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues got a new boost in spring this year. As part of the ongoing impact assessment, the Commission launched a stakeholder consultation that ran from July till September. The aim of the impact assessment is to identify possible improvements in the implementation of the Directive. The main options include minor amendments to the Directive with parallel provision of guidance or a broader legislative reform. ESPO favours the first option. It feels that better implementation of the Directive s provisions can be achieved through better monitoring and enforcing and through the provision of guidance in certain key areas. ESPO is very willing to contribute to the development of specific guidance, liaising with the European Commission, Member States and other stakeholders. The Commission s new Transport Policy White Paper also outlines actions in the field of marine affairs and security. On port services, the Commission plans to review general restrictions for pilotage and establish a framework for the granting of Pilot Exemption Certificates (PECs) in EU ports. The process started this year already. A consultation meeting has been organised and a study from the European Commission is about to be assigned, aiming to demonstrate the different applied frameworks for granting PECs in Europe and to analyse the pros and cons of pilotage services and PECs frameworks in terms of safety, environment and cost. ESPO closely follows the developments in this field and will be contributing to the study. In addition, within the White Paper the Commission announced the development of SafeSeaNet as the core system for all relevant maritime information tools needed to support maritime safety and security and the protection of the marine environment from ship-source pollution. The issue of electronic data exchange remains high on the agenda also in relation to the implementation of Directive 2010/65/EU on ship reporting formalities. The Directive requires Member States to transpose it into national regulations by May 2012, while as of June 2015 a single window has to be operational. In the beginning of this year an expert group, bringing together specialists from Member States, was established in order to address challenges related to the single window and also to work towards the implementation of the FAL forms in an appropriate electronic format. ESPO participates as observer in the expert group and will continue following up the progress made in this field. Finally, spring 2011 was marked by the Fukushima nuclear power station accident in Japan. The arrival of the first ships from Japan to European ports raised alarming discussions regarding the safe handling of those ships due to the potential danger of high radioactivity levels. A regulation imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 26 March. In addition, in several European ports inspections were held on board of arriving ships. P 15
The idea of publicly comparing performance of ports is still something of a taboo. In other sectors, for instance aviation and railways, it is quite accepted already to publish performance indicators in an open and transparent manner. Also ports in other parts of the world seem to be embracing a culture of benchmarking. Victor Schoenmakers, Chairman of ESPO
5. Economic Analysis and Statistics The PPRISM project, which is developing a series of performance indicators for the European port system, continued its progress during the past working year. The second Work Package, during which internal and external stakeholders assessed the academic pre-selection of indicators, started already in September 2010. In a first stage, internal stakeholders (port authorities) were consulted through four PPRISM workshops, combined with the Technical Committee meetings of ESPO. This resulted in a short-list of 39 indicators. As part of the project methodology, a second round of internal assessment of the indicators took place in November and December. In the following phase, launched in January 2011, external stakeholders assessed the proposed indicators. To that end, PPRISM partners prepared an easy-to-use online survey through which external stakeholders could assess those indicators within their own field of expertise or interest. The exercise received numerous responses from business and societal stakeholders. To complete the picture, a meeting with the relevant European stakeholder organisations was held in Brussels on 27 April to gather their views on the project and on the concrete indicators that were currently being assessed. At the annual ESPO Conference in Cyprus, PPRISM was also on top of the agenda. The PPRISM project partners presented the interim results and outlined the development of what is expected to be the outcome of the project, a European dashboard on port performance. With PPRISM, ESPO intends to create a culture of performance measurement and reporting in the sector which today is far from being general practice. As a first step in this learning process, PPRISM is not looking at the performance of individual ports and terminals, but focuses mainly on the performance of the port system as a whole. Work Package 2 resulted in a shortlist of fourteen indicators. Work Package 3, which started in May, aims to test practical implementation requirements for the shortlist of indicators through a European-wide pilot project. Around 400 port authorities associated with ESPO received end of July a user-friendly form with data requirements for the selected indicators, to be completed by 15 September. The pilot was conceived as a crucial test for the actual feasibility of the selected indicators and for data collection at European level. The process is expected to identify data comparability issues and it will allow to further refine calculation methods, data collection procedures and analysis of the indicators. Addressing such problems at this preliminary stage will enable the smooth set-up of a European Port Sector Dashboard once PPRISM is concluded. The last Work Package, which started in September, will indeed provide a concrete proposal on how to set up and articulate the Dashboard, presenting recommendations on its organisational, process-related and financial characteristics. On 19 September, a workshop on port performance measurement was organised by PPRISM partners in cooperation with the Commission to present the project s progress to the Commission services and Member States representations. PPRISM received good appraisal and gained support for its continuation. P 17
Cruise lines obviously want premium berthing locations near the city centre. On the one hand this helps in re-establishing a maritime atmosphere in port cities, but on the other hand it creates challenges on air quality, noise, congestion and security. Eeva Hietanen, Chairman of the ESPO Passenger Committee P 18
6. Passengers During its first year of operation, ESPO s newly established Passenger Committee focused on the implementation of the ship passenger rights Regulation, which was published in December last year and which will take effect by the end of 2012. The Regulation covers the rights of passengers when travelling by sea and inland waterway. Among these rights is the right to information or compensation in case of delay or cancellation of a journey. In addition, the new rules also offer people with a disability or reduced mobility protection when travelling by water. ESPO is concretely monitoring the implementation process in Member States and may develop further guidance to its cruise and ferry ports. The Committee is furthermore developing a policy on the city-port interface. This is particularly crucial for ferry and cruise activities, which are often located close to city centers. The main emphasis will be on operational aspects, such as berth allocation systems, and externalities, mainly emissions, noise and waste. These are being developed in close relation with the Sustainable Development Committee. Other topics on the agenda include administrative procedures and border controls. The Committee maintains a close relation with the cruise port organisations MedCruise and Cruise Europe, as well as with the European Cruise Council (ECC). ESPO was instrumental in setting up the first ECC Port Summit, which was held in Brussels in June this year. The event focused both on operational and strategic aspects, addressing ship-shore interface issues, including berthing requirements and the use of waste reception facilities. The ECC Port Summit was attended by senior executives of global cruise line operators and directors of the principal European cruise ports. P 19
7. Overview of ESPO Activities in the Period 2010-2011 Events organised, co-organised or supported: ESPO 2010 AGM and Award Ceremony Brussels, 9 November 2010 GreenPort Logistics Venice, 23-24 February 2011 AAPA-ESPO Trans-Atlantic Port Seminar Washington DC, 23 March 2011 ESPO 2011 Conference Optimising Port Performance and Reviewing Port Policy Limassol, 5-6 May 2011 GreenPort Congress Hamburg, 14-15 September 2011 Publications: ESPO 2010 Award Brochure November 2010 ESPO Port Governance Fact-Finding Report May 2011 ESPO 2010-2011 November 2011 Policy input: Contribution to the EC Consultation on the Future TEN-T Policy September 2010 Contribution to the EC Consultation on Service Concessions September 2010 Response to the EC Staff Working Paper on TEN-T Planning and Implementation Issues March 2011 ESPO-EFIP Joint Position Paper on the Review of the First Railway Package May 2011 Response to the EC Transport Policy White Paper July 2011 Information on the above events, publications and policy statements can be found on the ESPO website: www.espo.be, in particular under the sections Events, Publications and Policy Papers. P 20
8. ESPO Structure and Membership ESPO membership consists of the port authorities, port administrations and port associations of the seaports of the European Union. The organisation is furthermore open to observer members from countries neighbouring the EU. The membership structure is organised on national level and finds its reflection in the General Assembly of the organisation where each EU member country has three official delegates (and in some instance official proxies or alternates) with voting right. Non-EU countries have one observer delegate each. The General Assembly sets the overall policy of the organisation and meets twice a year. It elects the Chairman and two Vice-Chairmen of ESPO. For the period 2010-2012, ESPO is chaired by Victor Schoenmakers (The Netherlands), assisted by Vice-Chairmen Manuel Gómez Martín (Spain) and Julian Skelnik (Poland). The General Assembly mandates the daily policy-making of the organisation to the Executive Committee which consists of one representative per EU member country and a number of observers. It meets about five times a year. A series of Technical Committees provide technical recommendations to the Executive Committee on specific subjects which fall within their scope of competence. There are seven standing committees, dealing with port governance, intermodality and logistics, sustainable development, marine affairs and security, economic analysis and statistics, passengers and labour and operations. In addition, a horizontal advisory committee for legal matters works on an ad-hoc basis. The ESPO Secretariat is responsible for the overall coordination of the organisation s activities, including policy advice, communication, representation and administrative management. The Secretariat is based in Brussels and consists of Patrick Verhoeven (Secretary General), Isabelle Ryckbost (Senior Advisor), Martina Fontanet and Antonis Michail (Policy Advisors), Cécile Overlau (Events and Office Manager, PA), Ombeline d Hollander (Office Assistant), Daniëlla Arbyn (Communications Assistant) and Jeanette Voosen (Consulting Accountant). ESPO also runs the secretariat of EcoPorts and is holding a joint office with the European Federation of Inland Ports (EFIP). P 21
P 22
P 23
P 24
P 25
Overview of ESPO Membership Country National Port Body General Assembly Representative Executive Committee Representative Eddy Bruyninckx (Port of Antwerp) Belgium none Joachim Coens (Bruges-Zeebrugge Port Authority) Kate Verslype (Port of Ghent) Daan Schalck (Ghent Port Authority) Georgi Genchev (Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company) Bulgaria Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company Miroslav Milanov (Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company) Evgeniy Moskov (Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company) Stefan Neychev Stefan Neychev (Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company) Anthia Klerides (CPA) Cyprus Cyprus Ports Authority (CPA) Yiannakis Kokkinos (CPA) Demetris Phellas (CPA) Yiannakis Kokkinos Chrysis Prentzas (CPA) Tom Elmer Christensen (Danish Ports) Denmark Danish Ports Uffe Steiner Jensen (Danish Ports) Bjarne Mathiesen (Port of Aarhus) Tom Elmer Christensen Peter Jens Peters (Associated Danish Ports) Ain Kaljurand (Port of Tallinn) Estonia none Allan Kiil (Port of Tallinn) Alan Kiil Sven Ratassepp (Port of Tallinn) Markku Mylly (Finnish Port Association) Finland Finnish Port Association Henry Lindelöf (Finnish Port Association) Markku Mylly Heikki Nissinen (Port of Helsinki) Geoffroy Caude (UPF) France Union des Ports de France (UPF) Laurent Castaing (Grand Port Maritime du Havre) Philippe Deiss (Grand Port Maritime de Rouen) Geoffroy Caude Patrick Fourgeaud (CCI de Calais) Bettina Linkogel (Freie Hansestadt Bremen) Burkhard Müller (Ministry of Economy, Work and Transport - Lower Saxony) Germany none Jens Zingler (Ministry of Economy - Mecklenburg- Vorpommern) Bernhard Zampolin Bernhard Zampolin (Hamburg Port Authority) Bernd Unger (Ministry for Economy, Labour and Transport Schleswig Holstein) George Anomeritis (Piraeus Port Authority) Greece Hellenic Ports Association (ELIME) Stylianos Aggeloudis (Thessaloniki Port Authority) George Anomeritis Kostas Platikostas (Patras Port Authority) Eamonn O'Reilly (Dublin Port) Ireland Irish Ports Association Brendan Keating (Port of Cork Company) Enda Connellan Enda Connellan (Irish Ports Association) Francesco Nerli (Assoporti) Italy Associazione Porti Italiana - Assoporti Paolo Ferrandino (Assoporti) Francesco Nerli NN Irina Gorbatikova (Freeport of Riga Authority) Latvia none Leonids Loginovs (Freeport of Riga Authority) Leonids Loginovs Vladimirs Makarovs (Freeport of Riga Authority) P 26
Country National Port Body General Assembly Representative Executive Committee Representative Eugnieus Gentvilas (Klaipeda State Seaport Authority) Lithuania none Viktoras Lukocevicius (Klaipeda State Seaport Authority) Eugnieus Gentvilas NN Charles Abela (Transport Malta) Malta Transport Malta Jason Bongailas (Transport Malta) David Bugeja David Bugeja (Transport Malta) Dertje Meijer (Port of Amsterdam) The Netherlands none Hans Smits (Port of Rotterdam) David Moolenburgh (Zeeland SeaPorts) Wilko Tijsse Claase (Port of Amsterdam) Ingvar M. Mathisen (Port Authority of Bodo) Norway Norwegian Ports Rune Mjös (Norwegian Ports) Rune Mjös Dag Sem (Port of Oslo) Janusz Jarosinski (Port of Gdynia) Poland none Jaroslaw Siergiej (Port of Szczecin-Swinoujscie) Julian Skelnik (Port of Gdansk) Ryszard Strzyzewicz (Port of Gdansk) Portugal APP - Association Ports of Portugal João Matos Fernandes (APP) Lidia Sequiera (APP) NN Aurelian Andrei Popa (National Company Maritime Ports Administration SA Constantza) Romania none NN Aurelian Andrei Popa NN Tomaz Jamnik (Luka Koper) Slovenia Luka Koper Boris Jerman (Luka Koper) Boris Jerman NN Fernando Gonzales Laxe (Puertos del Estado) Spain Puertos del Estado Ramón Gomez-Ferrer Boldova (Port Authority of Valencia) Manual Morón (Port of Algeciras Bay) Manuel Gómez Martín (Puertos del Estado) Mikael Castanius (Ports of Sweden) Sweden Ports of Sweden Magnus Karestedt (Port of Göteborg) Mikael Castanius Lennart Pettersson (Copenhagen Malmö Port) Richard Bird (UK Major Ports Group) United Kingdom British Ports Association / UK Major Ports Group Paul Davey (Port of Felixstowe) Martin Putman (Portsmouth Commercial Port) Richard Bird and David Whitehead (alternate) David Whitehead (British Ports Association) Observer Members Albania Port of Dürres Emanuela Hysenllari (Port of Dürres) Croatia Croatian Ports Association Bojan Hlaca (Port of Rijeka Authority) Iceland Associated Icelandic Ports Gisli Gislason (Associated Icelandic Ports) Israel Israel Ports Company Dov Frohlinger (Israel Ports Company) Contact details ESPO Secretariat: Treurenberg 6, B-1000 Brussel / Bruxelles Tel + 32 2 736 34 63 - Fax + 32 2 736 63 25 Email: mail@espo.be - Web: www.espo.be P 27
9. Market Development in Figures The statistical section of this has been prepared by Prof. Dr. Theo Notteboom of the University of Antwerp / Institute of Transport and Maritime Management Antwerp (ITMMA) with support from Dries Verbraeken and Indra Vonck. The statistics in tonnes are based on figures of Eurostat kindly made available by Mr. Vidar Lund. Container statistics are compiled by ITMMA based on port authority statistics and statistics provided by organisations such as Puertos del Estado, Finnish Ports Association, etc.. Container traffic for selected European ports (in TEU) TEU throughput in selected European ports - ranking based on TEU of 2010 Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 Rotterdam Netherlands 10,783,825 9,743,290 11,145,804 14.4% 3.4% Antwerp Belgium 8,662,891 7,309,639 8,468,475 15.9% -2.2% Hamburg Germany 9,737,110 7,007,704 7,895,736 12.7% -18.9% Bremerhaven/Bremen Germany 5,448,189 4,578,642 4,888,655 6.8% -10.3% Valencia Spain 3,602,112 3,653,890 4,206,937 15.1% 16.8% Felixstowe United Kingdom 3,132,000 3,021,000 3,400,000 12.5% 8.6% Gioia Tauro Italy 3,467,772 2,857,000 2,851,261-0.2% -17.8% Bahía de Algeciras Spain 3,327,616 3,042,782 2,806,884-7.8% -15.6% Zeebrugge Belgium 2,209,715 2,328,198 2,499,756 7.4% 13.1% Marsaxlokk Malta 2,337,000 2,260,000 2,370,729 4.9% 1.4% Le Havre France 2,488,654 2,240,714 2,358,077 5.2% -5.2% St-Petersburg Russia 1,983,110 1,343,675 1,931,382 43.7% -2.6% Barcelona Spain 2,569,549 1,800,662 1,931,033 7.2% -24.8% Genoa Italy 1,766,605 1,533,627 1,758,858 14.7% -0.4% Southampton United Kingdom 1,617,000 1,381,000 n.a. La spezia Italy 1,246,000 1,046,063 1,285,155 22.9% 3.1% Las Palmas Spain 1,312,120 1,007,207 1,113,262 10.5% -15.2% Marseille France 851,425 876,757 953,435 8.7% 12.0% Gothenburg Sweden 862,595 824,218 891,498 8.2% 3.4% Piraeus Greece 433,582 660,837 863,808 30.7% 99.2% Tilbury United Kingdom 962,000 647,000 n.a. Leghorn Italy 780,000 592,050 628,489 6.2% -19.4% Liverpool United Kingdom 672,000 588,000 n.a. Taranto Italy 786,655 741,428 581,936-21.5% -26.0% Cagliari Italy 256,564 736,984 576,092-21.8% 124.5% Constantza Romania 1,380,192 594,299 556,694-6.3% -59.7% Dublin Ireland 676,000 548,000 554,000 1.1% -18.0% Naples Italy 481,521 515,868 532,432 3.2% 10.6% Bilbao Spain 557,345 443,464 531,457 19.8% -4.6% Lisbon Portugal 556,062 500,769 512,789 2.4% -7.8% Gdansk Poland 163,704 240,623 511,876 112.7% 212.7% Gdynia Poland 610,767 378,321 485,255 28.3% -20.5% Leixos Portugal 450,026 454,503 481,811 6.0% 7.1% Koper Slovenia 353,880 343,165 476,731 38.9% 34.7% Aarhus Denmark 458,000 385,000 447,000 16.1% -2.4% Thamesport United Kingdom 773,000 423,000 n.a. Kotka Finland 627,769 345,939 394,814 14.1% -37.1% Venice Italy 379,072 369,474 393,913 6.6% 3.9% Helsinki Finland 419,809 357,204 392,988 10.0% -6.4% Sines Portugal 233,118 253,495 382,089 50.7% 63.9% Santa Cruz Spain 397,788 346,254 357,472 3.2% -10.1% Málaga Spain 428,623 289,871 298,041 2.8% -30.5% Klaipeda Lithuania 373,263 247,977 295,221 19.1% -20.9% Trieste Italy 335,943 276,957 281,629 1.7% -16.2% Thessaloniki Greece 238,940 270,181 273,282 1.1% 14.4% Teesport United Kingdom 155,000 178,000 263,000 47.8% 69.7% Tarragona Spain 47,415 221,203 255,407 15.5% 438.7% Riga Latvia 207,122 182,980 254,475 39.1% 22.9% Savona Italy 252,837 196,317 220,000 12.1% -13.0% Vigo Spain 247,873 193,921 213,123 9.9% -14.0% Dunkerque France 214,485 212,000 200,300-5.5% -6.6% Lubeck Germany 214,000 185,022 195,578 5.7% -8.6% Oslo Norway 190,307 178,943 185,000 3.4% -2.8% Ravenna Italy 214,324 185,022 183,041-1.1% -14.6% Hull United Kingdom 262,000 182,000 n.a. St-Nazaire France 149,281 145,662 166,266 14.1% 11.4% P 30
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 Copenhagen/Mälmo Denmark/Sweden 194,000 151,000 153,000 1.3% -21.1% Sevilla Spain 130,452 129,736 152,612 17.6% 17.0% Tallin Estonia 180,927 131,059 151,969 16.0% -16.0% Helsingborg Sweden 135,934 111,981 148,852 32.9% 9.5% Alicante Spain 150,827 132,059 147,308 11.5% -2.3% Rouen France 142,035 121,126 129,585 7.0% -8.8% Varna Bulgaria 155,326 112,611 118,702 5.4% -23.6% Hamina Finland 178,068 105,051 114,151 8.7% -35.9% Bahía de Cádiz Spain 126,408 106,399 109,187 2.6% -13.6% Castellón Spain 88,208 67,075 103,956 55.0% 17.9% Ghent Belgium 61,380 63,657 83,065 30.5% 35.3% Baleares Spain 176,186 127,935 78,425-38.7% -55.5% Amsterdam Netherlands 424,880 203,084 60,043-70.4% -85.9% Bordeaux France 55,397 80,018 54,600-31.8% -1.4% Source: Websites Port Authorities, Puertos del Estado, Finnish Ports Association, etc.. Ports with highest growth in 2010 (compared to 2009) - in % growth Port Country 2009 2010 % 2009/2010 Gdansk Poland 240.623 511.876 112,7% Castellón Spain 67.075 103.956 55,0% Sines Portugal 253.495 382.089 50,7% Teesport United Kingdom 178.000 263.000 47,8% St-Petersburg Russia 1.343.675 1.931.382 43,7% Riga Latvia 182.980 254.475 39,1% Koper Slovenia 343.165 476.731 38,9% Helsingborg Sweden 111.981 148.852 32,9% Piraeus Greece 660.837 863.808 30,7% Ghent Belgium 63.657 83.065 30,5% Gdynia Poland 378.321 485.255 28,3% La spezia Italy 1.046.063 1.285.155 22,9% Bilbao Spain 443.464 531.457 19,8% Klaipeda Lithuania 247.977 295.221 19,1% Sevilla Spain 129.736 152.612 17,6% Aarhus Denmark 385.000 447.000 16,1% Tallin Estonia 131.059 151.969 16,0% Antwerp Belgium 7.309.639 8.468.475 15,9% Tarragona Spain 221.203 255.407 15,5% Valencia Spain 3.653.890 4.206.937 15,1% Genoa Italy 1.533.627 1.758.858 14,7% Rotterdam Netherlands 9.743.290 11.145.804 14,4% St-Nazaire France 145.662 166.266 14,1% Kotka Finland 345.939 394.814 14,1% Hamburg Germany 7.007.704 7.895.736 12,7% Felixstowe United Kingdom 3.021.000 3.400.000 12,5% Rauma Finland 143.269 160.582 12,1% Savona Italy 196.317 220.000 12,1% Alicante Spain 132.059 147.308 11,5% Las Palmas Spain 1.007.207 1.113.262 10,5% Helsinki Finland 357.204 392.988 10,0% Ports with highest growth in 2010 (compared to 2009) - in TEU growth Port Country 2009 2010 TEU 2009/2010 Rotterdam Netherlands 9.743.290 11.145.804 1.402.514 Antwerp Belgium 7.309.639 8.468.475 1.158.836 Hamburg Germany 7.007.704 7.895.736 888.032 St-Petersburg Russia 1.343.675 1.931.382 587.707 Valencia Spain 3.653.890 4.206.937 553.047 Felixstowe United Kingdom 3.021.000 3.400.000 379.000 Bremerhaven/Bremen Germany 4.578.642 4.888.655 310.013 Gdansk Poland 240.623 511.876 271.253 La spezia Italy 1.046.063 1.285.155 239.092 Genoa Italy 1.533.627 1.758.858 225.231 Piraeus Greece 660.837 863.808 202.971 Zeebrugge Belgium 2.328.198 2.499.756 171.558 Koper Slovenia 343.165 476.731 133.566 Barcelona Spain 1.800.662 1.931.033 130.371 Sines Portugal 253.495 382.089 128.594 Le Havre France 2.240.714 2.358.077 117.363 Marsaxlokk Malta 2.260.000 2.370.729 110.729 Gdynia Poland 378.321 485.255 106.934 P 31
Port Country 2009 2010 TEU 2009/2010 Las Palmas Spain 1.007.207 1.113.262 106.055 Bilbao Spain 443.464 531.457 87.993 Teesport United Kingdom 178.000 263.000 85.000 Marseille France 876.757 953.435 76.678 Riga Latvia 182.980 254.475 71.495 Gothenburg Sweden 824.218 891.498 67.280 Aarhus Denmark 385.000 447.000 62.000 Kotka Finland 345.939 394.814 48.875 Klaipeda Lithuania 247.977 295.221 47.244 Castellón Spain 67.075 103.956 36.881 Helsingborg Sweden 111.981 148.852 36.871 Leghorn Italy 592.050 628.489 36.439 Helsinki Finland 357.204 392.988 35.784 Tarragona Spain 221.203 255.407 34.204 Ports with a positive growth in the period 2008-2010 Port Country 2008 2010 % 2008/2010 TEU 2008/2010 Valencia Spain 3.602.112 4.206.937 16,8% 604.825 Piraeus Greece 433.582 863.808 99,2% 430.226 Rotterdam Netherlands 10.783.825 11.145.804 3,4% 361.979 Gdansk Poland 163.704 511.876 212,7% 348.172 Cagliari Italy 256.564 576.092 124,5% 319.528 Zeebrugge Belgium 2.209.715 2.499.756 13,1% 290.041 Felixstowe United Kingdom 3.132.000 3.400.000 8,6% 268.000 Tarragona Spain 47.415 255.407 438,7% 207.992 Sines Portugal 233.118 382.089 63,9% 148.971 Koper Slovenia 353.880 476.731 34,7% 122.851 Teesport United Kingdom 155.000 263.000 69,7% 108.000 Marseille France 851.425 953.435 12,0% 102.010 Naples Italy 481.521 532.432 10,6% 50.911 Riga Latvia 207.122 254.475 22,9% 47.353 La spezia Italy 1.246.000 1.285.155 3,1% 39.155 Thessaloniki Greece 238.940 273.282 14,4% 34.342 Marsaxlokk Malta 2.337.000 2.370.729 1,4% 33.729 Leixos Portugal 450.026 481.811 7,1% 31.785 Gothenburg Sweden 862.595 891.498 3,4% 28.903 Sevilla Spain 130.452 152.612 17,0% 22.160 Ghent Belgium 61.380 83.065 35,3% 21.685 St-Nazaire France 149.281 166.266 11,4% 16.985 Castellón Spain 88.208 103.956 17,9% 15.748 Venice Italy 379.072 393.913 3,9% 14.841 Helsingborg Sweden 135.934 148.852 9,5% 12.918 Ports with a negative growth in the period 2008-2010 Port Country 2008 2010 % Decline 2008/2010 TEU Decline 2008/2010 Hamburg Germany 9.737.110 7.895.736-18,9% -1.841.374 Constantza Romania 1.380.192 556.694-59,7% -823.498 Barcelona Spain 2.569.549 1.931.033-24,8% -638.516 Gioia Tauro Italy 3.467.772 2.851.261-17,8% -616.511 Bremerhaven/Bremen Germany 5.448.189 4.888.655-10,3% -559.534 Bahía de Algeciras Spain 3.327.616 2.806.884-15,6% -520.732 Amsterdam Netherlands 424.880 60.043-85,9% -364.837 Kotka Finland 627.769 394.814-37,1% -232.955 Taranto Italy 786.655 581.936-26,0% -204.719 Las Palmas Spain 1.312.120 1.113.262-15,2% -198.858 Antwerp Belgium 8.662.891 8.468.475-2,2% -194.416 Leghorn Italy 780.000 628.489-19,4% -151.511 Málaga Spain 428.623 298.041-30,5% -130.582 Le Havre France 2.488.654 2.358.077-5,2% -130.577 Gdynia Poland 610.767 485.255-20,5% -125.512 Dublin Ireland 676.000 554.000-18,0% -122.000 Baleares Spain 176.186 78.425-55,5% -97.761 Klaipeda Lithuania 373.263 295.221-20,9% -78.042 Hamina Finland 178.068 114.151-35,9% -63.917 Trieste Italy 335.943 281.629-16,2% -54.314 St-Petersburg Russia 1.983.110 1.931.382-2,6% -51.728 Lisbon Portugal 556.062 512.789-7,8% -43.273 Copenhagen/Mälmo Denmark/Sweden 194.000 153.000-21,1% -41.000 Santa Cruz Spain 397.788 357.472-10,1% -40.316 Varna Bulgaria 155.326 118.702-23,6% -36.624 Vigo Spain 247.873 213.123-14,0% -34.750 Savona Italy 252.837 220.000-13,0% -32.837 Ravenna Italy 214.324 183.041-14,6% -31.283 P 32
Port Country 2008 2010 % Decline 2008/2010 TEU Decline 2008/2010 Tallin Estonia 180.927 151.969-16,0% -28.958 Helsinki Finland 419.809 392.988-6,4% -26.821 Bilbao Spain 557.345 531.457-4,6% -25.888 Lubeck Germany 214.000 195.578-8,6% -18.422 Bahía de Cádiz Spain 126.408 109.187-13,6% -17.221 Dunkerque France 214.485 200.300-6,6% -14.185 Rouen France 142.035 129.585-8,8% -12.450 Rauma Finland 172.155 160.582-6,7% -11.573 Aarhus Denmark 458.000 447.000-2,4% -11.000 Genoa Italy 1.766.605 1.758.858-0,4% -7.747 Oslo Norway 190.307 185.000-2,8% -5.307 Alicante Spain 150.827 147.308-2,3% -3.519 Bordeaux France 55.397 54.600-1,4% -797 Liquid bulk traffic for selected European ports (1000 tonnes) Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 BELGIUM Antwerp 38 991 38 978 40 471 3,8% 3,8% Ghent 3 918 3 727 4 240 13,8% 8,2% Zeebrugge 5 920 6 115 5 872-4,0% -0,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 48 829 48 819 50 584 3,6% 3,6% BULGARIA Burgas 10 776 9 263 9 055-2,2% -16,0% Varna 945 1 135 1 085-4,4% 14,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 11 721 10 398 10 141-2,5% -13,5% CROATIA Bakar 1 557 2 103 1 769-15,9% 13,6% Omišalj 6 594 5 970 5 931-0,7% -10,1% Ploce 579 350 409 17,2% -29,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 8731 8422 8109-3,7% -7,1% CYPRUS Dekeleia (Dhekelia) 517 516 493-4,3% -4,6% Larnaca (Larnaka) Oil Terminal 1 128 1 158 1 111-4,0% -1,5% Vasiliko (Vasilico) 683 744 844 13,4% 23,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 2329 2417 2449 1,3% 5,2% DENMARK Aabenraa 681 364 313-14,2% -54,0% Aalborg 1 590 1 571 1 324-15,7% -16,7% Århus 1 779 1 438 1 577 9,7% -11,3% Esjberg 448 558 470-15,7% 4,8% Fredericia (Og Shell-Havnen) 12 409 11 458 10 505-8,3% -15,3% Københavns Havn 3 218 2 398 1 848-22,9% -42,6% Statoil-Havnen 7 700 7 741 6 978-9,9% -9,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 27825 25528 23016-9,8% -17,3% ESTONIA Tallinn 20 522 22 845 25 471 11,5% 24,1% Vene-Balti 730 336 264-21,6% -63,9% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 21252 23181 25735 11,0% 21,1% FINLAND Hamina 2 244 1 906 2 458 28,9% 9,5% Kemi 525 439 461 4,8% -12,3% Kokkola 990 904 1 062 17,5% 7,2% Kotka 1 087 946 699-26,1% -35,6% Naantali 4 651 4 385 4 670 6,5% 0,4% Oulu 1 315 1 211 1 455 20,1% 10,7% Pori 1 008 756 762 0,8% -24,4% Sköldvik 21 549 20 787 20 514-1,3% -4,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 33369 31335 32080 2,4% -3,9% P 33
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/201 200/2010 FRANCE Bayonne 984 916 646-29,5% -34,4% Bordeaux 5 459 5 375 5 225-2,8% -4,3% Brest 1 075 1 072 1 108 3,4% 3,1% Dunkerque 14 839 12 423 5 589-55,0% -62,3% Fort-de France (Martinique) 1 307 1 415 1 505 6,3% 15,1% Guadeloupe (Guadeloupe) 830 754 747-1,0% -10,1% La Rochelle 2 587 2 637 2 678 1,6% 3,5% Le Havre 48 953 45 576 42 388-7,0% -13,4% Lorient 1 060 1 087 1 022-6,0% -3,6% Marseille 66 683 60 197 58 366-3,0% -12,5% Nantes Saint-Nazaire 22 102 19 511 20 166 3,4% -8,8% Port-la-Nouvelle 1 096 1 193 1 173-1,7% 7,0% Port Réunion (ex Pointe-des- Galets) (Réunion) 781 832 878 5,5% 12,5% Rouen 10 830 9 771 10 563 8,1% -2,5% Sète 1 415 1 613 1 829 13,4% 29,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 180002 164372 153883-6,4% -14,5% GERMANY Bremen 1 320 1 154 1 259 9,1% -4,6% Brunsbüttel 6 477 5 172 4 601-11,0% -29,0% Bützfleth 2 219 2 237 2 557 14,3% 15,3% Emden 867 839 1 057 26,0% 21,9% Hamburg 15 600 14 416 14 140-1,9% -9,4% Nordenham 524 377 269-28,6% -48,6% Rostock 4 914 4 155 4 834 16,3% -1,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 68550 58744 50378-14,2% -26,5% GREECE Agii Theodori 14 694 16 421 17 381 5,8% 18,3% Eleusina 13 490 10 954 8 308-24,2% -38,4% Heraklio 668 597 565-5,4% -15,5% Lavrio 1 234 759 450-40,7% -63,5% Megara 9 661 8 788 8 339-5,1% -13,7% Perama 543 622 1 000 60,7% 84,2% Piraeus 68 251 394 56,7% 477,9% Rhodes 630 407 n.a. n.a. n.a. Thessaloniki 8 084 7 950 8 495 6,9% 5,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 49072 46747 44932-3,9% -8,4% IRELAND Bantry Bay 784 911 1 061 16,4% 35,2% Cork 6 002 5 001 5 174 3,5% -13,8% Dublin 4 074 4 049 3 780-6,6% -7,2% Galway 737 650 598-8,1% -18,9% Limerick 1 482 1 032 1 070 3,7% -27,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 13080 11643 11683 0,3% -10,7% ITALY Augusta 25 681 23 285 25 302 8,7% -1,5% Barletta 578 749 397-47,0% -31,4% Brindisi 2 572 1 801 4 348 141,5% 69,1% Cagliari 650 233 188-19,3% -71,0% Catania 665 720 911 26,5% 36,9% Civitavecchia 1 160 1 149 364-68,3% -68,6% Falconara Marittima 5 724 5 134 4 886-4,8% -14,6% Fiumicino 7 177 6 246 5 735-8,2% -20,1% Gaeta 1 846 1 234 1 653 33,9% -10,5% Gela 9 421 6 876 7 939 15,5% -15,7% Genova 19 488 20 813 20 347-2,2% 4,4% La Spezia 4 345 3 878 4 146 6,9% -4,6% Lipari 1 654 n.a. 1 672 n.a. 1,1% Livorno 14 713 7 591 8 953 17,9% -39,2% Milazzo 15 021 11 820 12 107 2,4% -19,4% Napoli 4 409 5 028 6 741 34,1% 52,9% Ortona 736 561 756 34,6% 2,7% Other - Italy 546 1 670 Palermo 1 746 1 091 1 716 57,3% -1,8% Porto Foxi 26 305 23 597 23 932 1,4% -9,0% Porto Torres 2 858 1 164 1 682 44,5% -41,1% Portovesme 936 791 232-70,6% -75,2% Ravenna 6 044 4 530 6 080 34,2% 0,6% Santa Panagia 17 224 14 383 14 056-2,3% -18,4% Savona - Vado 7 972 5 257 6 682 27,1% -16,2% Taranto 7 653 7 836 6 438-17,8% -15,9% Trieste 29 502 34 935 27 974-19,9% -5,2% Venezia 12 764 11 165 12 296 10,1% -3,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 229391 203540 207533 2,0% -9,5% P 34
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 LATVIA Liepaja 923 661 575-12,9% -37,7% Riga 5 301 6 609 6 593-0,2% 24,4% Ventspils 17 410 16 937 13 715-19,0% -21,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 23634 24207 20884-13,7% -11,6% LITHUANIA Butinge 9 068 8 389 9 017 7,5% -0,6% Klaipeda 10 955 10 514 9 809-6,7% -10,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 20024 18903 18827-0,4% -6,0% MALTA Malta (Valletta) 750 785 853 8,6% 13,7% Marsaxlokk 805 875 1 245 42,4% 54,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1555 1660 2098 26,4% 34,9% NETHERLANDS Amsterdam 33 811 37 832 37 295-1,4% 10,3% Moerdijk 2 469 1 893 2 013 6,4% -18,5% Rotterdam 189 895 193 282 209 503 8,4% 10,3% Terneuzen 6 653 6 249 8 087 29,4% 21,6% Velsen/Ijmuiden 2 784 108 149 38,2% -94,6% Vlaardingen 681 2 047 2 722 33,0% 299,7% Vlissingen 3 995 3 627 4 271 17,8% 6,9% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 240287 245037 264040 7,8% 9,9% NORWAY Ålesund 545,3 555,975 546,699-1,7% 0,3% Bergen 47 672 51 299 44 987-12,3% -5,6% Bremanger 1 591 2 081 3 886 86,8% 144,3% Florø/Flora 432 572 599 4,8% 38,6% Fredrikstad/Sarpsborg 847 714 848 18,7% 0,1% Kristiansund N/Grip 2 144 2 124 2 025-4,6% -5,5% Molde 3 894 3 278 3 938 20,1% 1,1% Oslo 2 052 2 082 2 086 0,2% 1,6% Tønsberg/Slagentangen/ Valløy 10 860 10 679 9 939-6,9% -8,5% Trondheim/Flakk 620 589 634 7,6% 2,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 70657 73973 69489-6,1% -1,7% POLAND Gdansk 10608,141 9992,669 14778,422 47,9% 39,3% Gdynia 1 331 1 187 1 400 18,0% 5,1% Swinoujscie 658 857 1 088 27,0% 65,4% Szczecin 818 736 857 16,4% 4,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 13415 12772 18124 41,9% 35,1% PORTUGAL Aveiro 629 638 925 45,0% 47,0% Leixões 8 142 7 097 6 730-5,2% -17,3% Lisboa 1 563 1 950 1 838-5,7% 17,6% Setúbal 959 630 641 1,7% -33,1% Sines 17 780 15 977 18 320 14,7% 3,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 29073 26293 28453 8,2% -2,1% ROMANIA Constanta 11 915 7 251 5 540-23,6% -53,5% Midia 1 913 3 987 4 164 4,4% 117,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 13827 11238 9705-13,6% -29,8% SLOVENIA Koper 2 743 2 676 2 763 3,2% 0,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 2743 2676 2763 3,2% 0,7% SPAIN Algeciras 22 249 21 431 25 116 17,2% 12,9% Avilés 537 674 649-3,7% 20,9% Barcelona 12 106 12 340 11 578-6,2% -4,4% Bilbao 23 023 20 497 19 763-3,6% -14,2% Cartagena 20 110 16 169 15 122-6,5% -24,8% Castellón 7 761 7 777 7 667-1,4% -1,2% Ceuta 1 115 1 195 944-21,1% -15,4% Ferrol 2 225 2 402 2 617 8,9% 17,6% Gijón 1 478 1 389 1 245-10,3% -15,8% Huelva 13 667 13 028 16 500 26,7% 20,7% La Coruña 7 455 6 818 7 587 11,3% 1,8% Las Palmas 4 709 4 583 4 520-1,4% -4,0% Motril 1 420 1 330 1 283-3,6% -9,7% Palma Mallorca 2 074 2 024 1 763-12,9% -15,0% Santa Cruz de Tenerife 9 456 8 423 8 223-2,4% -13,0% Tarragona 19 018 20 000 19 455-2,7% 2,3% Valencia 5 969 5 767 5 171-10,3% -13,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 154372 145846 149203 2,3% -3,3% SWEDEN Bergs Oljehamn 934 1 067 1 086 1,8% 16,3% Brofjorden Preemraff 20 035 19 893 n.a. n.a. n.a. Gävle 2 556 2 363 1 614-31,7% -36,8% Göteborg 22 929 21 343 22 679 6,3% -1,1% Helsingborg 896 694 908 30,9% 1,3% Karlshamn 2 629 2 088 2 259 8,2% -14,1% Malmö 4 419 4 599 4 917 6,9% 11,3% Nynäshamn (ports) 2 362 2 180 n.a. n.a. n.a. Oxelösund (ports) 2 379 1 256 1 946 54,9% -18,2% Skellefteå 467 536 466-12,9% 0,0% Stenungsund (Ports) 2 964 2 559 2 662 4,1% -10,2% Stockholm 749 606 623 2,8% -16,9% Sundsvall 800 599 586-2,2% -26,8% Västerås 518 517 543 5,0% 4,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 64638 60299 P 35
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 UNITED KINGDOM Aberdeen 2 166 2 053 2 051-0,1% -5,3% Belfast 2 558 2 522 2 516-0,3% -1,7% Bristol 1 756 1 600 1 545-3,5% -12,0% Cardiff 1 345 1 243 938-24,6% -30,3% Clydeport 5 123 4 802 4 115-14,3% -19,7% Cromarty Firth 2 079 2 725 3 493 28,2% 68,0% Dundee 505 448 504 12,5% -0,2% Forth 33 925 31 894 29 979-6,0% -11,6% Hull 1 821 1 818 1 265-30,5% -30,6% Immingham 24 654 21 119 21 882 3,6% -11,2% Kirkwall 4 552 3 027 3 687 21,8% -19,0% Liverpool 12 189 11 765 11 174-5,0% -8,3% London 20 569 18 547 19 346 4,3% -5,9% Londonderry 774 654 901 37,8% 16,4% Manchester 5 868 5 394 5 600 3,8% -4,6% Medway 2 142 4 426 3 799-14,2% 77,4% Milford Haven 34 699 38 343 41 719 8,8% 20,2% Newhaven 343 230 709 207,7% 106,6% Plymouth 1 331 1 216 1 244 2,4% -6,5% River Hull & Humber 8 224 8 477 8 941 5,5% 8,7% Southampton 28 996 26 946 28 964 7,5% -0,1% Sullom Voe 14 507 11 217 11 268 0,5% -22,3% Tees & Hartlepool 27 044 25 400 24 990-1,6% -7,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 237172 225866 230629 2,1% -2,8% Dry bulk traffic for selected European ports (1000 tonnes) Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 BELGIUM Antwerp 27132 17163 19438 13,3% -28,4% Ghent 17896 12886 18159 40,9% 1,5% Ostend 791 645 681 5,6% -13,9% Zeebrugge 1947 1508 1534 1,7% -21,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 47766 32202 39812 23,6% -16,7% BULGARIA Burgas 2745 2692 2285-15,1% -16,8% Varna 7352 5613 6864 22,3% -6,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 10097 8305 9149 10,2% -9,4% CROATIA Bakar 2436 1526 661-56,7% -72,9% Ploce 4028 1979 3615 82,7% -10,3% Rabac 1068 524 n.a. n.a. n.a. Raša - Bršica 1962 2223 1866-16,1% -4,9% Rijeka 420 512 340-33,6% -18,9% Split 1571 1195 1684 41,0% 7,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 11485 7959 8166 2,6% -28,9% CYPRUS Larnaka (Larnaca) 715 601 635 5,8% -11,2% Vasiliko (Vasilico) 743 571 394-31,0% -47,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1458 1172 1029-12,2% -29,4% DENMARK Aabenraa 988 874 766-12,4% -22,5% Aalborg 1043 857 922 7,6% -11,6% Aalborg Portland (Cementfabrikken Rordal) 2574 1407 1396-0,7% -45,8% Århus 3405 2155 2221 3,1% -34,8% Asnæsværkets Havn 1284 997 510-48,8% -60,2% Avedøreværkets Havn 570 551 396-28,1% -30,5% Enstedværkets Havn 5824 5588 3053-45,4% -47,6% Esbjerg 997 1103 871-21,0% -12,6% Fredericia (Og Shell-Havnen) 1085 960 1396 45,4% 28,7% Kalundborg 502 669 801 19,8% 59,8% Kolding 1026 748 802 7,2% -21,9% Københavns Havn 2084 1826 1584-13,3% -24,0% Køge 831 782 1110 41,9% 33,6% Nordjyllandsværkets Havn 923 1038 1022-1,5% 10,7% Odense 2863 1926 1884-2,2% -34,2% Randers 1084 780 773-0,9% -28,7% Rønne 1112 851 775-8,9% -30,3% Studstrupværkets Havn 1232 1141 850-25,5% -31,0% Thyborøn 1113 1035 473-54,3% -57,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 30538 25287 21605-14,6% -29,3% ESTONIA Kunda 597 514 591 15,1% -0,9% Tallinn 2261 3984 5500 38,0% 143,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 2858 4498 6091 35,4% 113,1% P 36
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 FINLAND Helsinki 824 780 777-0,4% -5,7% Inkoo 1676 1144 1229 7,4% -26,6% Inland Ports 1608 785 1309 66,7% -18,6% Kaskinen 967 207 411 98,6% -57,5% Kemi 588 384 619 61,0% 5,3% Kokkola 4115 4090 4590 12,2% 11,5% Kotka 2887 1135 3281 189,2% 13,7% Koverhar 1161 737 1072 45,4% -7,6% Loviisa 451 720 643-10,7% 42,5% Naantali 1071 874 1094 25,2% 2,2% Oulu 589 506 485-4,1% -17,6% Parainen 1188 594 753 26,7% -36,6% Pietarsaari 1053 626 832 33,0% -20,9% Pori 3548 3880 3639-6,2% 2,6% Raahe 5338 4068 5150 26,6% -3,5% Rauma 2342 1336 1335-0,1% -43,0% Tornio 842 668 1043 56,3% 23,9% Uusikaupunki 724 509 876 72,1% 20,9% Vaasa 628 620 580-6,3% -7,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 31598 23663 29719 25,6% -5,9% FRANCE Bayonne 1722 1670 1564-6,3% -9,2% Bordeaux 2797 2408 2649 10,0% -5,3% Brest 1353 1374 1411 2,7% 4,3% Caen 529 345 741 114,9% 40,0% Dieppe 502 361 359-0,6% -28,5% Dunkerque 26832 17369 22712 30,8% -15,4% Guadeloupe (Guadeloupe) 921 773 793 2,6% -13,9% La Rochelle 4338 4073 4809 18,1% 10,9% Le Havre 4667 3893 3396-12,8% -27,2% Lorient 1947 1463 1645 12,4% -15,5% Marseille 14124 8473 11825 39,6% -16,3% Nantes Saint-Nazaire 8423 7938 8121 2,3% -3,6% Port-la-Nouvelle 725 608 806 32,5% 11,2% Port Réunion (Réunion) 1390 1260 1370 8,8% -1,4% Rouen 9204 9791 12108 23,7% 31,5% Sète 1292 996 1092 9,7% -15,5% St Malo 892 742 1094 47,4% 22,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 81658 63538 76495 20,4% -6,3% GERMANY Brake 3370 3107 3085-0,7% -8,5% Bremen 7747 6525 7653 17,3% -1,2% Brunsbüttel 5119 3800 2826-25,6% -44,8% Bützfleth 3346 2343 2664 13,7% -20,4% Flensburg 581 487 n.a. n.a. n.a. Hamburg 26638 22166 25844 16,6% -3,0% Kiel 908 1076 909-15,5% 0,0% Lübeck 1215 1121 1026-8,5% -15,6% Nordenham 1995 2356 2679 13,7% 34,3% Rostock 6959 6176 7003 13,4% 0,6% Wilhelmshaven 3340 2995 2911-2,8% -12,8% Wismar 1817 1605 1856 15,6% 2,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 65043 55765 58455 4,8% -10,1% GREECE Aliverio 2615 2013 1583-21,4% -39,5% Almyros (Amaliapoli) Volou 3328 3407 2270-33,4% -31,8% Antikyra 1529 1528 1655 8,3% 8,3% Chalkida 1622 803 708-11,9% -56,3% Eleusina 2734 2126 2070-2,6% -24,3% Heraklio 791 636 423-33,6% -46,6% Igoumenitsa 670 623 227-63,5% -66,1% Kavala 1002 835 1132 35,6% 13,0% Larymna 3313 1884 2995 59,0% -9,6% Milos Island 2932 1884 1921 2,0% -34,5% Thessaloniki 4254 3440 3970 15,4% -6,7% Volos 7237 6752 4499-33,4% -37,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 32028 25932 23453-9,6% -26,8% IRELAND Cork 1763 1316 1566 19,1% -11,1% Dublin 2385 1571 1469-6,5% -38,4% Limerick 9089 6400 7753 21,1% -14,7% Waterford 706 640 747 16,6% 5,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 13942 9927 11535 16,2% -17,3% P 37
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 ITALY Ancona 1270 1295 854-34,1% -32,8% Augusta 846 479 292-39,0% -65,5% Bari 868 1275 2125 66,6% 144,7% Barletta 680 732 533-27,3% -21,6% Brindisi 7220 7407 4534-38,8% -37,2% Chioggia 1912 3033 1863-38,6% -2,6% Civitavecchia 702 606 805 32,8% 14,7% Gaeta 658 695 424-38,9% -35,5% Genova 3839 2452 2695 9,9% -29,8% La Spezia 2300 3944 1729-56,2% -24,9% Manfredonia 823 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Marina Di Carrara 601 517 442-14,6% -26,4% Monfalcone 2124 2346 796-66,1% -62,5% Oristano 1404 1153 988-14,2% -29,6% Other - Italy 425 476 n.a. n.a. n.a. Piombino 5426 5356 3290-38,6% -39,4% Porto Torres 1800 2933 1788-39,0% -0,7% Portovesme 4929 2130 1551-27,2% -68,5% Pozzallo 1130 1472 1128-23,3% -0,1% Ravenna 16620 14196 9574-32,6% -42,4% Savona - Vado 5008 8886 3458-61,1% -30,9% Taranto 24843 18109 15428-14,8% -37,9% Trieste 1117 745 653-12,4% -41,5% Venezia 10096 9997 8012-19,8% -20,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 96643 90234 62963-30,2% -34,9% LATVIA Liepaja 1834 1997 1849-7,4% 0,8% Riga 18654 18471 16683-9,7% -10,6% Ventspils 7825 6815 7965 16,9% 1,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 28313 27283 26497-2,9% -6,4% LITHUANIA Klaipeda 9744 9677 11773 21,7% 20,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 9744 9677 11773 21,7% 20,8% MALTA Malta (Valletta) 675 578 498-13,8% -26,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 675 578 498-13,8% -26,2% NETHERLANDS Amsterdam 34195 30941 31513 1,8% -7,8% Delfzijl/Eemshaven 2106 1150 2346 104,1% 11,4% Dordrecht 1105 509 2347 360,8% 112,4% Harlingen 765 512 880 71,9% 15,0% Moerdijk 1693 1003 1610 60,6% -4,9% Rotterdam 93930 64195 81190 26,5% -13,6% Terneuzen 3493 3099 3717 19,9% 6,4% Velsen/Ijmuiden 17955 10373 14608 40,8% -18,6% Vlissingen 6666 6202 5041-18,7% -24,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 161907 117983 143251 21,4% -11,5% NORWAY Bergen 2348 2386 2628 10,1% 11,9% Brønnøy 2231 1789 2144 19,8% -3,9% Drammen 1256 998 978-2,0% -22,1% Fredrikstad/Sarpsborg 1301 1199 1196-0,3% -8,1% Haugesund 3021 2553 2413-5,5% -20,1% Kristiansund N/Grip 2031 1974 1639-16,9% -19,3% Mo i Rana/Rana 1912 1609 2285 42,0% 19,5% Molde 3259 2234 2793 25,0% -14,3% Narvik 14558 12571 17544 39,6% 20,5% Oslo 1401 1057 1019-3,6% -27,2% Other - Norway 10521 9527 11154 17,1% 6,0% Porsgrunn 5940 4507 5903 31,0% -0,6% Stavanger 1565 1274 1123-11,8% -28,2% Trondheim/Flakk 848 623 781 25,3% -7,8% Verdal/Levanger 779 594 821 38,3% 5,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 54979 46904 56432 20,3% 2,6% POLAND Gdansk 4037 5853 6664 13,9% 65,1% Gdynia 4780 5397 5322-1,4% 11,4% Police 1897 768 1802 134,4% -5,0% Swinoujscie 4531 2633 5252 99,5% 15,9% Szczecin 4678 4489 5050 12,5% 7,9% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 19923 19140 24090 25,9% 20,9% PORTUGAL Aveiro 1370 1432 1649 15,1% 20,4% Leixões 2187 2090 2229 6,6% 1,9% Lisboa 5340 4425 4698 6,2% -12,0% Setúbal 3144 3019 3507 16,2% 11,5% Sines 4354 5296 2996-43,4% -31,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 16395 16262 15079-7,3% -8,0% ROMANIA Constanta 18656 13769 17043 23,8% -8,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 18656 13769 17043 23,8% -8,6% SLOVENIA Koper 9619 6385 6219-2,6% -35,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 9619 6385 6219-2,6% -35,3% P 38
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 SPAIN Algeciras 1587 1661 1471-11,4% -7,3% Alicante 1087 1111 727-34,6% -33,1% Almería 4907 3292 3215-2,3% -34,5% Avilés 3115 2293 2747 19,8% -11,8% Barcelona 3506 3913 3535-9,7% 0,8% Bilbao 5266 3828 4452 16,3% -15,5% Cádiz 2118 1615 1687 4,5% -20,3% Cartagena 4623 3616 3114-13,9% -32,6% Castellón 4017 1866 2941 57,6% -26,8% Ferrol 9781 9268 7435-19,8% -24,0% Gijón 16870 12456 13394 7,5% -20,6% Huelva 6525 4292 5416 26,2% -17,0% La Coruña 3290 3216 3192-0,7% -3,0% Las Palmas 1159 764 743-2,8% -35,9% Málaga 1343 767 773 0,8% -42,5% Marín-Pontevedra 847 880 961 9,2% 13,4% Palma Mallorca 2131 1689 1855 9,8% -12,9% Pasajes 2353 1658 1657-0,1% -29,6% Santa Cruz de Tenerife 1353 848 819-3,5% -39,5% Santander 3732 2920 2880-1,4% -22,8% Sevilla 2343 2421 2133-11,9% -8,9% Tarragona 12421 10485 9433-10,0% -24,1% Valencia 5137 3524 2578-26,8% -49,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 99510 78383 77158-1,6% -22,5% SWEDEN Gävle 540 546 559 2,2% 3,4% Halmstad 844 674 716 6,2% -15,2% Helsingborg 697 673 760 13,0% 9,0% Karlshamn 2379 1933 1782-7,8% -25,1% Köping 793 528 665 26,0% -16,1% Luleå 8307 5848 8508 45,5% 2,4% Malmö 1162 924 929 0,5% -20,1% Oxelösund (ports) 3516 1981 4097 106,9% 16,5% Skellefteå 951 864 852-1,4% -10,4% Stockholm 980 878 791-9,9% -19,3% Uddevalla 582 390 420 7,9% -27,8% Västerås 805 657 702 6,9% -12,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 21557 15895 20781 30,7% -3,6% UNITED KINGDOM Belfast 3412 3138 3885 23,8% 13,9% Bristol 7828 5980 4205-29,7% -46,3% Cardiff 527 389 615 58,3% 16,7% Clydeport 8241 6815 7604 11,6% -7,7% Forth 1990 1837 1943 5,8% -2,4% Fowey 935 774 773-0,1% -17,3% Glensanda 6336 5591 5846 4,6% -7,7% Hull 3698 2560 2229-12,9% -39,7% Immingham 23116 18720 17205-8,1% -25,6% Ipswich 1664 1640 2124 29,5% 27,6% Liverpool 7376 7027 6152-12,5% -16,6% London 14383 11650 12008 3,1% -16,5% Londonderry 922 919 730-20,5% -20,8% Manchester 1447 1153 1355 17,6% -6,4% Medway 6235 3510 3113-11,3% -50,1% Newport, Gwent 1940 1936 753-61,1% -61,2% Plymouth 870 645 842 30,5% -3,3% Port Talbot 8086 5147 8769 70,4% 8,4% River Hull & Humber 977 825 884 7,1% -9,4% Shoreham 1280 1304 1473 12,9% 15,1% Southampton 1968 1700 2308 35,8% 17,2% Tees & Hartlepool 10977 8250 5565-32,5% -49,3% Trent River 894 592 578-2,4% -35,3% Tyne 3853 2423 1754-27,6% -54,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 118954 94524 92712-1,9% -22,1% P 39
Roro traffic for selected European ports Ro Ro, mobile self-propelled units and other Ro Ro, mobile non-self-propelled units (1000 tonnes) Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 BELGIUM Antwerp 6 175 4 668 5 480 17,4% -11,3% Ghent 1 963 1 559 1 825 17,1% -7,0% Ostend 6 724 3 933 3 365-14,4% -50,0% Zeebrugge 16 701 12 995 12 997 0,0% -22,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 31 563 23 155 23 667 2,2% -25,0% CROATIA Split 676 550 600 9,1% -11,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 676 550 600 9,1% -11,2% CYPRUS Lemesos (Limassol) 271 187 273 45,6% 0,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 271 187 273 45,6% 0,6% DENMARK Århus 3 055 2 407 2 424 0,7% -20,7% Esbjerg 1 705 1 597 1 677 5,0% -1,6% Fredericia (Og Shell-Havnen) 261 231 305 32,0% 16,6% Frederikshavn 2 456 2 096 2 173 3,7% -11,6% Gedser 1 779 1 341 1 401 4,5% -21,2% Grenå 624 597 563-5,7% -9,8% Helsingør (Elsinore) 4 429 3 720 3 990 7,3% -9,9% Hirtshals 1 037 1 132 1 184 4,6% 14,2% Kalundborg 2 653 2 148 2 154 0,3% -18,8% Københavns Havn 333 261 301 15,2% -9,5% Køge 374 346 350 1,2% -6,3% Rødby (Færgehavn) 6 148 5 219 5 832 11,7% -5,1% Rønne 467 438 443 1,0% -5,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 25320 21531 22796 5,9% -10,0% FINLAND Hamina 348 211 280 33,0% -19,5% Hanko 2 198 1 381 1 641 18,8% -25,4% Helsinki 6 653 5 277 6 271 18,8% -5,7% Kemi 382 388 563 45,4% 47,3% Kotka 1 367 770 612-20,5% -55,3% Naantali 2 832 1 848 2 203 19,3% -22,2% Oulu 796 935 974 4,1% 22,4% Turku 2 203 1 894 1 986 4,9% -9,8% Vaasa 261 208 244 17,0% -6,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 17041 12911 14774 14,4% -13,3% FRANCE Ajaccio 901 1 062 n.a. n.a. n.a. Bastia 2 581 2 635 1 155-56,2% -55,2% Caen 1 520 1 446 1 575 8,9% 3,7% Calais 18 139 18 508 17 500-5,4% -3,5% Cherbourg 1 337 1 096 n.a. n.a. n.a. Dieppe 633 1 029 n.a. n.a. n.a. Le Havre 1 234 1 277 n.a. n.a. n.a. Marseille 2 290 2 162 2 358 9,0% 3,0% Nantes Saint-Nazaire 306 200 259 29,5% -15,4% St Malo 248 231 208-10,1% -16,2% Toulon 540 1 010 n.a. n.a. n.a. TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 29728 30657 GERMANY Bremerhaven 3 425 2 046 165-91,9% -95,2% Cuxhaven 1 000 765 866 13,2% -13,4% Emden 1 678 1 211 0-100,0% -100,0% Hamburg 531 487 6-98,7% -98,8% Kiel 1 493 1 547 2 004 29,6% 34,2% Lübeck 16 619 13 954 13 970 0,1% -15,9% Puttgarden 4 073 3 479 3 990 14,7% -2,1% Rostock 8 103 5 972 6 269 5,0% -22,6% Sassnitz 2 323 1 435 1 603 11,7% -31,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 39246 30896 28873-6,5% -26,4% GREECE Antirio 2 361 1 869 724-61,3% -69,4% Corfu 528 436 314-28,2% -40,6% Heraklio 2 092 1 684 1 885 11,9% -9,9% Igoumenitsa 2 554 2 226 2 287 2,7% -10,5% Megara 272 346 99-71,5% -63,8% Paloukia Salaminas 1 323 2 255 500-77,8% -62,2% Patras 3 575 2 720 2 919 7,3% -18,4% Perama 1 323 2 255 500-77,8% -62,2% Piraeus 5 401 4 123 4 216 2,3% -21,9% Rhodes 383 235 n.a. n.a. n.a. Rio 2 361 1 869 724-61,3% -69,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 22173 20018 14166-29,2% -36,1% P 40
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 IRELAND Dublin 9 222 8 543 9 664 13,1% 4,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 9222 8543 9664 13,1% 4,8% ITALY Ancona 2 412 2 076 2 404 15,8% -0,4% Bari 1 029 926 1 482 60,0% 44,0% Brindisi 819 204 902 341,9% 10,2% Cagliari 3 672 2 800 2 194-21,7% -40,3% Civitavecchia 2 586 2 101 2 863 36,2% 10,7% Genova 5 731 4 689 7 164 52,8% 25,0% Gioia Tauro 843 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Livorno 5 265 6 789 6 968 2,6% 32,3% Messina 3 542 2 459 9 997 306,6% 182,2% Monfalcone 474 403 377-6,4% -20,4% Napoli 2 313 2 735 3 557 30,1% 53,8% Olbia 12 582 8 608 8 985 4,4% -28,6% Palermo 3 685 2 318 4 045 74,5% 9,8% Piombino 1 493 1 499 2 384 59,0% 59,7% Porto Torres 1 458 960 2 087 117,3% 43,1% Salerno 4 290 2 546 3 148 23,7% -26,6% Taranto 2 457 2 668 3 437 28,8% 39,9% Trapani 810 n.a. 732 n.a. -9,7% Trieste 3 170 2 922 7 271 148,8% 129,4% Venezia 1 444 480 1 021 112,7% -29,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 60077 47186 71019 50,5% 18,2% LATVIA Riga 525 435 360-17,2% -31,5% Ventspils 1 312 866 1 250 44,3% -4,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1837 1301 1610 23,7% -12,4% LITHUANIA Klaipeda 1 966 1 860 2 536 36,4% 29,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1966 1860 2536 36,4% 29,0% MALTA Malta (Valletta) 331 303 301-0,5% -9,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 331 303 301-0,5% -9,1% NETHERLANDS Amsterdam 633 586 227-61,3% -64,2% Rotterdam 9 130 7 536 8 136 8,0% -10,9% Velsen/Ijmuiden 217 381 383 0,3% 76,2% Vlaardingen 4 533 3 805 4 242 11,5% -6,4% Vlissingen 1 442 986 1 092 10,7% -24,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 15956 13294 14080 5,9% -11,8% NORWAY Haugesund 2 254 1 758 2 184 24,2% -3,1% Kristiansand S 552 496 490-1,1% -11,2% Larvik 353 521 553 6,1% 56,6% Oslo 937 753 758 0,7% -19,1% Porsgrunn, Rafnes, Herøya, Brevik, Skien, Langesund, 404 251 269 7,3% -33,4% Voldsfjorden Sandefjord 259 243 214-12,0% -17,6% Stavanger, Sola/Risavik, Forus, Dusavik, Mekjarvik 3 683 3 629 3 038-16,3% -17,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 8442 7650 7504-1,9% -11,1% POLAND Gdansk 602 336 361 7,3% -40,1% Gdynia 1 892 1 348 1 539 14,2% -18,6% Swinoujscie 3 221 3 124 3 950 26,4% 22,6% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 5714 4808 5849 21,6% 2,4% PORTUGAL Setúbal 322 184 233 27,0% -27,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 322 184 233 27,0% -27,4% SPAIN Algeciras 1 169 855 804-6,0% -31,3% Almería 230 233 238 2,1% 3,5% Barcelona 5 142 4 319 4 411 2,1% -14,2% Cádiz 707 567 554-2,3% -21,7% Ceuta 393 370 346-6,7% -12,1% Las Palmas 1 460 1 319 1 398 6,0% -4,2% Málaga 240 289 250-13,6% 4,1% Melilla 265 293 302 3,2% 14,1% Palma Mallorca 3 644 3 130 2 876-8,1% -21,1% Pasajes 451 318 362 13,9% -19,6% Santa Cruz de Tenerife 1 650 1 530 1 585 3,6% -4,0% Santander 453 374 725 93,8% 60,1% Tarragona 297 139 147 6,1% -50,4% Vigo 845 596 645 8,2% -23,7% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 16946 14333 14643 2,2% -13,6% P 41
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 SWEDEN Göteborg 11 907 10 348 11 615 12,2% -2,5% Helsingborg 4 544 3 858 4 167 8,0% -8,3% Kappelskär 3 202 2 115 2 518 19,1% -21,4% Karlshamn 1 145 1 003 1 353 34,9% 18,2% Karlskrona 1 062 829 961 15,9% -9,5% Malmö 5 109 3 452 3 523 2,0% -31,0% Nynäshamn (ports) 961 888 n.a. n.a. n.a. Oskarshamn 299 310 293-5,6% -2,0% Stockholm 2 367 2 326 2 634 13,3% 11,3% Trelleborg 12 280 10 057 10 638 5,8% -13,4% Umeå 263 225 218-3,2% -17,1% Varberg 626 566 563-0,5% -10,0% Ystad 1 968 2 209 2 575 16,6% 30,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 45734 38187 41060 7,5% -10,2% UNITED KINGDOM Aberdeen 240 216 383 77,3% 59,7% Belfast 4 569 4 504 4 497-0,2% -1,6% Bristol 896 577 572-0,9% -36,2% Cairnryan 2 928 2 572 2 609 1,4% -10,9% Dover 23 911 24 694 23 560-4,6% -1,5% Felixstowe 2 726 2 149 2 314 7,7% -15,1% Fishguard 560 366 416 13,7% -25,6% Fleetwood 1 571 1 327 1 137-14,3% -27,6% Forth 194 316 896 183,3% 362,6% Harwich 3 082 2 396 2 385-0,5% -22,6% Heysham 3 043 2 960 3 338 12,8% 9,7% Holyhead 3 143 2 659 2 609-1,9% -17,0% Hull 3 985 3 419 2 964-13,3% -25,6% Immingham 14 704 12 877 14 605 13,4% -0,7% Ipswich 431 754 462-38,7% 7,2% Larne 5 154 4 280 4 608 7,7% -10,6% Liverpool 6 856 6 522 7 357 12,8% 7,3% London 7 571 7 900 11 437 44,8% 51,1% Medway 395 410 245-40,3% -38,0% Milford Haven 1 122 891 1 001 12,4% -10,7% Newhaven 838 631 633 0,3% -24,5% Poole 1 016 801 467-41,7% -54,1% Portsmouth 2 776 2 849 2 395-15,9% -13,7% Ramsgate 1 942 1 575 1 687 7,1% -13,1% Southampton 1 236 944 1 010 7,0% -18,3% Stranraer 1 190 1 177 1 017-13,6% -14,5% Tees & Hartlepool 3 147 2 236 2 278 1,9% -27,6% Tyne 879 672 841 25,0% -4,3% Warrenpoint 1 490 1 332 1 874 40,7% 25,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 101593 94005 99597 5,9% -2,0% General non-containerised cargo traffic for selected European ports Other cargo, not elsewhere specified (1000 tonnes) Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 BELGIUM Antwerp 16 719 10 166 10 984 8,0% -34,3% Gent (Ghent) 3 100 2 351 3 207 36,4% 3,4% Oostende (Ostend) 793 725 841 15,9% 6,0% Zeebrugge 852 862 1 078 25,0% 26,5% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 21465 14105 16110 14,2% -24,9% BULGARIA Burgas 1 939 1 108 1 211 9,3% -37,5% Varna 788 646 786 21,8% -0,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 2727 1754 1998 13,9% -26,8% CROATIA Ploce 193 209 285 36,3% 47,5% Rijeka 950 886 862-2,7% -9,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1143 1095 1147 4,8% 0,4% CYPRUS Larnaka (Larnaca) 198 135 149 10,3% -24,9% Lemesos (Limassol) 497 331 337 1,8% -32,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 695 466 486 4,3% -30,1% DENMARK Aalborg 246 185 196 5,9% -20,5% Århus 378 211 168-20,4% -55,6% Avedøreværkets Havn 339 358 688 92,2% 103,3% Esbjerg 347 294 251-14,8% -27,7% Fredericia (Og Shell-Havnen) 298 264 196-25,7% -34,2% Grenå 156 114 125 9,9% -19,8% Kolding 212 155 154-0,6% -27,3% Københavns Havn 167 139 240 72,1% 43,2% Køge 124 128 158 23,5% 27,6% Odense 261 199 91-54,3% -65,1% Randers 282 227 333 46,9% 17,9% Vejle 545 224 267 19,3% -51,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 3355 2498 2867 14,8% -14,6% P 42
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 ESTONIA Kunda 908 685 1 034 51,1% 13,9% Pärnu 1 013 1 152 1 517 31,7% 49,7% Tallinn 4 797 3 362 463-86,2% -90,4% Vene-Balti 169 137 208 51,9% 23,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 6887 5336 3223-39,6% -53,2% FINLAND Hamina 966 509 659 29,5% -31,8% Hanko 1 010 718 1 508 109,9% 49,3% Helsinki 505 295 335 13,9% -33,6% Inkoo 138 39 56 41,6% -59,5% Inland Ports 506 298 353 18,5% -30,2% Kaskinen 743 473 566 19,5% -23,8% Kemi 505 383 463 21,1% -8,3% Kokkola 543 416 533 28,2% -1,9% Kotka 2 120 1 872 3 364 79,6% 58,6% Koverhar 306 159 265 66,2% -13,2% Loviisa 526 459 505 9,9% -4,0% Naantali 164 144 140-2,5% -14,6% Oulu 335 106 310 191,4% -7,6% Pietarsaari 614 525 648 23,6% 5,7% Pori 372 425 364-14,3% -2,1% Raahe 684 663 746 12,5% 9,0% Rauma 3 029 2 278 2 748 20,7% -9,3% Tornio 475 443 595 34,3% 25,5% Turku 453 307 423 37,9% -6,7% Uusikaupunki 122 144 98-32,2% -20,1% Vaasa 126 123 134 8,8% 6,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 14242 10780 14813 37,4% 4,0% FRANCE Bayonne 1 041 1 733 2 002 15,5% 92,2% Bordeaux 140 181 218 20,2% 55,8% Calais 71 113 108-4,1% 52,5% Dunkerque 7 364 6 579 6 369-3,2% -13,5% La Rochelle 917 726 874 20,4% -4,7% Le Havre 191 58 61 5,3% -68,1% Marseille 2 498 1 877 2 225 18,6% -10,9% Nantes Saint-Nazaire 680 328 565 72,1% -16,9% Port-la-Nouvelle 106 104 95-8,8% -10,3% Rouen 1 448 897 1 001 11,7% -30,9% Sète 167 110 144 31,2% -14,1% St Malo 312 190 251 32,3% -19,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 14935 12895 13913 7,9% -6,8% GERMANY Brake 2 160 1 268 1 570 23,7% -27,3% Bremen 5 264 3 417 4 179 22,3% -20,6% Bremerhaven 1 333 810 3 396 319,0% 154,8% Cuxhaven 197 325 667 105,4% 238,0% Duisburg, Homberg, Walsum 1 595 709 727 2,6% -54,4% Emden 1 561 1 235 2 546 106,2% 63,2% Hamburg 2 348 2 068 2 738 32,4% 16,6% Kiel 306 167 432 159,0% 41,1% Lübeck 421 355 830 133,7% 97,1% Nordenham 1 077 741 303-59,0% -71,8% Rostock 1 255 1 042 1 367 31,3% 8,9% Wilhelmshaven 586 807 156-80,6% -73,4% Wismar 1 340 1 384 1 500 8,4% 12,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 19444 14328 20413 42,5% 5,0% GREECE Almyros (Amaliapoli) Volou 358 287 339 18,2% -5,3% Antikyra 64 125 101-18,9% 58,9% Chalkida 581 444 492 10,8% -15,4% Corfu 248 52 166 220,4% -32,8% Eleusina 1 770 1 365 1 038-23,9% -41,3% Heraklio 145 94 112 18,4% -22,7% Igoumenitsa 234 71 228 220,6% -2,5% Kavala 233 319 251-21,3% 8,0% Patras 113 140 74-47,0% -34,4% Rhodes 127 115 n.a. n.a. n.a. Thessaloniki 1 014 741 910 22,9% -10,3% Volos 626 356 382 7,4% -39,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 5512 4109 4094-0,4% -25,7% IRELAND Cork 286 188 214 13,7% -25,2% Drogheda 177 75 32-57,0% -81,7% Dublin 232 119 67-43,9% -71,2% Limerick 248 146 84-42,5% -66,2% Waterford 170 72 71-1,4% -58,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1113 600 468-22,1% -58,0% P 43
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 ITALY Augusta 305 113 127 12,5% -58,4% Bari 523 118 258 117,7% -50,7% Barletta 227 88 542 514,7% 139,2% Brindisi 153 108 871 706,9% 469,2% Cagliari 2 813 123 72-41,5% -97,4% Catania 505 230 231 0,1% -54,3% Chioggia 1 157 826 1 863 125,5% 61,0% Civitavecchia 278 230 1 175 409,7% 322,0% Gaeta 234 37 98 167,2% -57,9% Genova 1 189 943 476-49,5% -60,0% La Spezia 952 506 638 26,3% -32,9% Livorno 6 119 1 627 1 522-6,5% -75,1% Marina Di Carrara 1 549 1 411 1 045-25,9% -32,5% Messina 121 15 4-74,9% -96,9% Milazzo 129 100 121 21,0% -5,8% Monfalcone 2 334 2 293 1 963-14,4% -15,9% Napoli 99 899 1 003 11,6% 916,6% Olbia 265 67 37-44,3% -86,0% Ortona 136 137 78-43,0% -42,6% Piombino 1 329 1 330 2 207 65,9% 66,0% Porto Nogaro 1 165 860 1 112 29,2% -4,6% Pozzallo 318 151 398 164,6% 25,4% Ravenna 4 726 2 026 4 385 116,4% -7,2% Salerno 332 332 768 131,4% 131,5% Savona - Vado 1 378 343 745 117,1% -46,0% Taranto 8 907 3 538 5 092 43,9% -42,8% Trieste 1 483 323 2 136 560,8% 44,0% Venezia 2 265 2 307 2 212-4,1% -2,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 40992 21084 31181 47,9% -23,9% LATVIA Liepaja 1 394 1 347 1 695 25,9% 21,7% Riga 2 224 1 897 2 840 49,7% 27,7% Ventspils 677 666 894 34,4% 32,2% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 4295 3910 5429 38,9% 26,4% LITHUANIA Klaipeda 2 074 1 595 1 844 15,6% -11,1% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 2074 1595 1844 15,6% -11,1% NETHERLANDS Amsterdam 2 854 1 883 3 074 63,3% 7,7% Delfzijl/Eemshaven 605 586 533-9,1% -12,0% Den Helder 231 231 265 14,9% 14,9% Dordrecht 255 326 444 36,4% 74,0% Harlingen 103 125 117-6,5% 13,9% Moerdijk 1 117 1 448 1 583 9,3% 41,8% Rotterdam 8 243 9 215 11 004 19,4% 33,5% Terneuzen 1 932 1 762 1 839 4,3% -4,8% Velsen/Ijmuiden 2 353 1 992 2 056 3,3% -12,6% Vlissingen 5 968 4 542 5 676 25,0% -4,9% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 23662 22110 26592 20,3% 12,4% NORWAY Ålesund 413 445 510 14,6% 23,6% Bergen 1 973 2 031 1 884-7,2% -4,5% Florø/Flora 314 384 369-4,0% 17,5% Fredrikstad/Sarpsborg 328 196 266 35,5% -19,0% Kristiansand S 200 140 126-9,7% -37,0% Kristiansund N/Grip 1 266 1 168 1 304 11,6% 3,0% Larvik 183 99 129 30,7% -29,2% Måløy 131 123 125 2,1% -4,7% Mo i Rana/Rana 1 391 1 135 1 032-9,1% -25,8% Oslo 254 201 239 19,1% -6,1% Other - Norway 4 026 2 197 2 999 36,5% -25,5% Tromsø/Buvik 262 264 263-0,4% 0,3% Trondheim/Flakk 358 279 326 17,1% -9,0% Verdal/Levanger 752 622 682 9,7% -9,3% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 11851 9283 10254 10,5% -13,5% POLAND Gdansk 871 703 690-1,8% -20,7% Gdynia 736 702 649-7,6% -11,8% Swinoujscie 421 423 392-7,3% -6,8% Szczecin 1 771 1 273 1 595 25,3% -9,9% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 3798 3102 3327 7,3% -12,4% P 44
Port Country 2008 2009 2010 2009/2010 2008/2010 PORTUGAL Aveiro 1 464 890 1 158 30,1% -20,9% Leixões 648 346 596 72,2% -8,0% Lisboa 406 298 287-3,6% -29,2% Setúbal 1 518 1 297 1 584 22,1% 4,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 4036 2831 3625 28,1% -10,2% ROMANIA Constanta 3 955 2 936 2 937 0,0% -25,7% Galati 1 344 1 008 1 118 10,9% -16,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 5299 3944 4055 2,8% -23,5% SLOVENIA Koper 1 374 1 555 1 538-1,1% 12,0% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 1374 1555 1538-1,1% 12,0% SPAIN Algeciras 1 389 1 506 1 622 7,7% 16,8% Alicante 269 207 149-27,7% -44,5% Almería 297 113 102-9,2% -65,5% Avilés 1 177 962 1 174 22,0% -0,3% Barcelona 777 861 622-27,8% -20,0% Bilbao 3 515 2 200 3 161 43,7% -10,1% Cádiz 224 151 109-27,9% -51,3% Cartagena 452 138 180 30,6% -60,2% Castellón 515 545 455-16,4% -11,6% Ferrol 823 555 621 11,9% -24,6% Gijón 572 349 464 33,1% -18,9% Huelva 450 316 283-10,3% -37,1% La Coruña 1 561 1 336 1 006-24,7% -35,6% Las Palmas 468 544 608 11,6% 30,0% Marín-Pontevedra 527 483 572 18,5% 8,5% Motril 193 155 145-6,3% -25,0% Palma Mallorca 285 311 334 7,5% 17,1% Pasajes 1 921 1 492 1 819 21,9% -5,3% Santander 732 536 567 5,7% -22,6% Sevilla 762 653 638-2,4% -16,3% Tarragona 766 597 665 11,3% -13,2% Valencia 5 209 3 975 4 837 21,7% -7,1% Vigo 885 504 560 11,1% -36,7% Villagarcía (de Arosa) 171 123 127 3,8% -25,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 23939 18610 20820 11,9% -13,0% SWEDEN Gävle 1 021 672 948 41,2% -7,2% Halmstad 812 535 596 11,4% -26,6% Helsingborg 217 310 243-21,6% 11,8% Husum 1 814 1 103 1 080-2,1% -40,5% Jätterssön 1 069 880 1 360 54,6% 27,2% Kalmar 543 255 353 38,3% -34,9% Karlshamn 948 774 594-23,2% -37,3% Köping 152 155 169 8,8% 10,8% Luleå 236 184 319 73,7% 35,3% Oskarshamn 633 415 402-3,2% -36,5% Oxelösund (ports) 1 352 886 1 164 31,3% -13,9% Piteå 1 416 1 196 1 392 16,4% -1,7% Skellefteå 278 218 225 3,3% -18,8% Sölvesborg 684 295 533 80,3% -22,2% Stockholm 244 210 240 14,0% -1,8% Sundsvall 1 054 928 920-0,9% -12,7% Uddevalla 352 348 449 28,9% 27,6% Umeå 989 902 971 7,7% -1,8% Varberg 771 738 861 16,8% 11,7% Västerås 149 148 249 68,7% 67,4% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 14734 11152 13067 17,2% -11,3% UNITED KINGDOM Aberdeen 2 001 1 846 1 555-15,8% -22,3% Belfast 594 305 285-6,5% -52,1% Boston 537 357 513 43,8% -4,5% Bristol 297 137 279 104,0% -6,0% Cardiff 567 252 505 99,9% -11,0% Clydeport 516 447 97-78,3% -81,2% Dover 222 220 367 66,7% 65,6% Forth 491 448 249-44,4% -49,2% Goole 1 149 971 1 033 6,4% -10,1% Great Yarmouth 119 91 147 61,7% 23,7% Hull 1 245 909 1 351 48,7% 8,5% Immingham 1 579 1 008 862-14,4% -45,4% Ipswich 178 134 136 1,6% -23,5% Liverpool 927 424 876 106,3% -5,5% London 2 142 1 814 1 501-17,3% -30,0% Manchester 123 119 141 18,1% 14,8% Medway 1 760 1 667 1 516-9,0% -13,8% Newport, Gwent 1 253 798 1 300 62,9% 3,7% Peterhead 339 331 444 34,1% 30,9% Portsmouth 665 594 443-25,4% -33,3% River Hull & Humber 150 163 209 28,2% 39,2% Shoreham 285 235 226-3,7% -20,5% Sunderland 210 210 98-53,5% -53,3% Tees & Hartlepool 2 948 2 037 967-52,5% -67,2% Tyne 273 198 249 25,7% -8,8% TOTAL SELECTED PORTS 20569 15716 15349-2,3% -25,4% P 45