The Law Applicable To the Arbitration A Comparative Study ( 401120059) / 2014
ب
ج
د شكر وتقدير - /... الباحثة
ه الا هداء.......... الباحثة
و قاي مة المحتويات 1........ : 1 3 4... : : : 5. : 5 5 6... : : : 7 13.. : : 14. : 15 16.. : :
ز 20 34 35 38 40 42...... : : : : : : 47. : 49 50. :. : 54. : 62. : 63. : 67 72.. : : 75 : 77 78 80 85 87 93 99....... : : : : : : :
ح 100. : 104. : 107 111.. : : 111 112 114... : : : 118.
ط " " " " " "...( )... )..(
ي great importance. "The law applicable to the arbitration" "Comparative study" Student preparation: Elaf Khalil Al Saleh The supervision of prof. Jamal El-Din Meknas Summary The study was on the theme of "the law applicable to the arbitration," that is a subject of Especially with the spread of a system of arbitration as a way to resolve disputes, so it is undoubtedly a legal phenomenon worth studying. This topic has been discussed in a comparative framework between the two legislatures Kuwaiti and Jordanian and guided by the Egyptian law whenever possible and this through five chapters. The study shows that the legal rules applicable to the dispute have a great importance in all stages of the arbitration; these rules may play an important role in determining whether the arbitration judgment is a national or foreign rule. For this, the study called for the choice of the parties to be explicit and clear to the applicable law on their dispute replace the application, as well as for the rules that govern the arbitration procedures hoping to fill all the gaps and procedures that required by the arbitration dispute. Also the study showed that The authors of the laws organizing the arbitration process should give the parties of the arbitration the whole freedom in the recourse to law or rules to govern procedures of the arbitration dispute, not inconsistent with the fundamental principles relating to public order and which relates to ensuring the right to defense and respect for equality between the parties. The law applicable to the dispute have been chosen by the parties, or leave it to the arbitral tribunal, also in this case you should respect the freedom of the parties and this by choosing the closest laws to theirs. (It may be the law of the state in dispute).
1 : : ". " ".12.(2009) :
2.. ". (3). (4). http://www.blog.saeeed.com/2012/02/arbitrage-dans-les-contrats/.16.(2009) (3).4.(2003).31.(2005) : (4)
3... : : " :.82.(2009)
4 : ( ) : :..
5 : : :.. : :.1.2.3.4 : : :.
6 : 2001 (31).1980 (38) 1995 (11) : " 173. "188 : : :.1. :.2. :.3 (3)..13.(2007).252.(2009) (3).161.(2007)
7 :.4. :.5. :.6 (3). : : ( ) :.1.( 2002) :.45.(2010).(2012).(2014).9 (3).
8. :.2.( 2007) :..... -
9. :.3.( 2012) :. :.4 2001 31.( 2012) :
10 :. "."... :.5.( 2008) :
11.... :.. :.6.( 2008) :
12... :.7.( 2011). :..
13. :.8.( 2011). :.. : :,.
14... :. :. :
15...." "
16. :. :. : : :.. (3)..42 1.(1990).98 4.(1987).35 (3)
17.. (3). " (4). " " " (5)" ".11.(2009).35.10.(1996).33.11 (3) (4) (5)
18.. " ". " (3). :. : : :.11.56.(2006).12.(1999) (3)
19.. ( )..6.(1995).16.(2010)
20 :..... : : :.29
21 : : Expertise. (3). :. : http://ar.wikipedia.org.23.(2012) :.63 (3)
22 ) (.... () :. " (3). " : : (4). " : 2010 29.".1968/11/7 34 449 (3).2007/2/21 " 63 " 2007 31 (4).48 4.(2004)
23 : :. :. :.
24 :. :.. : :. " " /http://www.almaany.com." :
25. : :. ( ) :. :...22.(2012) :.12
26. : :. :. : : :. :. :."".( 1994-1415) :.(14/5) (217/2)
27. : -1.. -2...1989/12/18 53 372 :
28... (3). :. -1.85 46 : ( )....31.22 (3)
29-2. ( ) -3. : : " ". ".32.(2002) :.27
30.....31 :.22
31... (3)..32.59 :.57 : (3)
32 : : -1. : -2. : -3..
33 : -4. : -5 ( ).
34.. (4) (3) :.... : : : :. 35 :.(1990) : ". 214.(1986) :.(1984). 20.(1997). 70 (3). 20.(1985) :. 102 (4)
35 : :... (3)....35.21.53.(1951) : (3)
36.. ". " :....201 200 87.565 1982 27 194-1972/2/15
37 : :. :. :.
38 : :.. (3)..1 214 : 108 1.(1976) :.633 464.(1950) (3) 4.(1980) :.75 74 73 27 2 4
39.......20.(1998) :
40. :.. : :.. 96.(1997) :
41.. (3). ( ) ) Ph. Fouchard, larbitrage commercial international, op. cit, 19; R David, larbitrage dans le commerce international, op, cit, 109..20 / :.70.20 :.34.(2010) (3)
42 (... : : ).219 : :.(1985) :.137
43 (........ )..(. 102 :.105 :
44....
45... : :.
46. :. : ". " " " (3). " ". - 1997/6/21 61 4173-1998/7/11 66 5539 - - 1999/3/1 65 10350. (3).
47.......1985
48 :. :. :. :
49.. :. :. :. 1995 11
50 : :. : : : " 174.". 1980 38 (174)
51 " /15 ". :. : :. 2001 31 (15).115 :
52.. : : " 178 " /15 (3) ". (4) ".102.(1997).117 : (3). 1980 38 (178) (4). 2001 31 (15) (1 )
53. : :. :. : :..155.119 :
54 : : 1975. (3).. (1.136.(1967) ). 1975 (3/13). 1971.. (3)
55.. "rules of law" " (3). (4). depecage du contrat.. (3) Berthold Goldman, "Le droit applicable selon la Convention de la BIRD du 18 mars 1965 pour le reglement des differends relatives aux investissements enter Etats et ressortissants d autres Etats". In "Investissements etrangers et arbitrage entre Etats et personnes privees, La Convention BIRD du 18 mars 1965", CRDMI- Faculte de droit et de sciences economiques de Dijon, paris, pedone, 1969, p.133, spec. p. 145. (4) Schreuer, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Article 42, FILJ, Vol,!2, no, 1, 1997, p, 412-417.
56. : " ". :. (3). 1975 Schreuer, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Ibid p, 422.. (3) Berthold Goldman, "Le droit applicable selon la Convention de la BIRD op.cit, p,144.
57 : : - ". " :. (3). Benvenutti & Bonfant (4) Schreuer, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Article p, 433. Ibid, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Article p, 410,422. (3) Ibid, Goldman, "Le droit applicable selon la Convention de la BIRD" p,142. (4) Schreuer, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Article p, 422-423.
58. :. :.. :....
59 : :. : 1975.. 1975 :.1988,.102
60... 12. 1929 : :.
61 :... (1. 225.(2005) : )
62. :. :. :. :
63 : :... ( )...477.(2001).183
64 :....62.20.(2002).(1991)
65. 1958 1961 "." (3)..20.(2000).185.120 (3)
66...20.(1980).202
67 : : : : " 1979."...93
68.... (3)..781.(2001).255.(1998) (3).17201128.(1977)
69 (42) 1965. (38). 1979 (21) ( ). :.1..2.
70.3. : :.. 1980 ).( ).(.125.96
71. ) (..268.(2000)
72 : : : : " 182.." " /36.".
73.. : :..760.316
74 ".. ".. " ". " ".194.140
75..
76. :.. : :. :
77.. :. :. :
78 : :.... 1958 () :..135.(1997) :
79.. " " ". "..132.94.(2000)
80 : :. 1987 (1/21 ) 1/21 ).( (4/2/3 ) 1961. : 1958 ( /1/5 ) -1 - :.456.(1988)
81." ( /1/4 ) : 1961." "....(2000).16.132.(1997) :
82. ( ) ARAMCO.. (1985) : (19). 198.(2010).102.(1980) :
83.1..2..".. ) (
84.. ).(
85. " :. " :.(1997) :.191.29
86 :. :. :
87 : :. ". " : :. :.421.(2003).162 :
88.. "4" (182) "" 1980 (38) "... " 1994 27."... " ) (182) : (... " ".162.130.(1997)
89.. : :.. : : "4" (182) " 25. -.1994 27 (6)
90. :.1 "4" (182). 25 1980 (38).
91.... :.92.(1981) :.147.(1987) Mayer, Goldman Gaillard. 60
92 :.2. :.3.
93. :.. -1-2 -3. : : ) (..216 :.1923 : 24. 1958.1961...
94. "."... 1961 ) " (.". 1958.1961 ( )
95.. ( ) 1972.
96. : :1923 24 :. : 1958 : (3). :1961 : :.117-116.(1981) :.106 -.(1998).1923 24 : 1958 ( )... ( )... () (3) :...( )... ( ).
97 1961. : : 1988/1/1.. : : (3). : :.1961 1919.. 1987/4/14 1407 16 (1\21) : - - - - -. - - (3)
98. :.... (37) 1968. 100. 1972/02/06 1968/05/16
99. (3). :. :. :. :.83 1999 :.(1978) :. 371.(2000) :.1.2000-27 -22.132.(2000) :.257.(2000) : (3)
100. :.. : : (3).479.(2004) "." ( ) 2000/6/8 2000 151 :.210 2000.77 1994 27.(2012) : (3)
101. ( ). ( ). :....(1995) :.477.(2001)
102... : :..181.(2000) :.255 :
103 : "."..105
104.... : :..106
105 :... ( /36) : " ".(2000).154
106 182 "." ) (... 151 2000.210 2000/6/8
107.. " /36 " 182 ".". : :.488 (samir edition).( ).198
108 : : : " ". " :.(2007).271
109. ". 36 " " 182. : : 1985..941 :
110. : :. :. :.253
111 : :..
112. : : :.1 ).(.2 ( )..3...4.
113.5..6..7..8..9...10
114.11..12. : :.1..2..3
115..4..5..6..7.
116.8..9..10..11..12.
117.13..14..15..16.
118. : : :,.(1990).1.1,,, 4.(1987).2..( 1994-1415).3. : :..(1997).1..(2000).2..(1997).3.(2000).4...(2007).5
119.6.(2000)..7.(1995)..8.(2002)..9.(2006)..10.(2002)..11.(2003)..12.(2003)..13.(2009)..14.(1998).
120.(1997).15..(2001).16...(2010).17.(2009).18..(2004).19...(1998).20..(1984).21.(1981).22..(1999).23.
121.24 ).( (samir edition)..25.(2010)..26.(2000)..27.(1950)..28.(1997)..29.(1967)..30.(1987)..31.(1995)..32.(2001).
122.33.(2005)..34.(2009)..35.(1976).1.36.(1997)..37.(1991)..38.(2014)..39.(2007)..40.(1986).
123.41.(1997)..42.(2000)..43.(2004)..44.(1951)..45.(2012) 27 1994..46.(1998) -..47.(2002)..48.(1999)..49.(2009).
124.(2010).50...(2010).51.(1990).52.-.(1985).53.-.(2007).54..(2000).55...(2009).56. " ".(2012).57 : :.(2012).1.
125.2.(1988)..3.(1996)..4.(2012). : :.1 31 2007 " 63 ". 2007/2/21.2-1972/2/15 194-27. 1982.3 372 53. 1989/12/18.4 4173 61 1997/6/21 -..5 5539 66 1998/7/11 -.
126-1999/3/1 65 10350.6. 2000/6/8 2000 151.7. 2000. 1975.8. 1968/11/7 34 449.9.1985.10. 1995 11.11 1980 38 (174).12.. 2001 31 (15).13 1980 38 (178).14..1994 27 (6).15 : :.(2000).1. 2000-27 -22
127.2.(1980) 4 4 2..3.(1978) 371..4.(1977) 28.11.5.(2000). : :.1. 1961.2 16 1407. 1987/4/14.3 (). 1958.4. 1971.5 24. 1923.6. 1985
128. 2010.7. 1968 (37).8 : : 1- Berthold Goldman, "Le droit applicable selon la Convention de la BIRD du 18 mars 1965 pour le reglement des differends relatives aux investissements enter Etats et ressortissants d autres Etats". In "Investissements etrangers et arbitrage entre Etats et personnes privees, La Convention BIRD du 18 mars 1965", CRDMI- Faculte de droit et de sciences economiques de Dijon, paris, pedone, 1969, p.133, spec. 2- Ph. Fouchard, larbitrage commercial international, 19;,R David, larbitrage dans le commerce international, 3- Rene David arabitrage dans le commerce international-edition 1982. 4- Schreuer, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, Article 42, FILJ, Vol,!2, no, 1, 1997. : : http://ar.wikipedia.org. http://www.almaany.com. http://www.blog.saeeed.com. http://ar.wikipedia.org/wik.