LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS LAX AIRPORT OPERATIONS

Similar documents
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). SUMMARY: Under this notice, the FAA announces the submission deadline of

? 0-? WA", ilp. Y ON 1Z Cond 1 0 AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS BOARD REPORT TO THE Los Angeles World Airports 0*1-

Los Angeles International Airport Rules and Regulations SECTION 05 TERMINAL OPERATIONS

Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). SUMMARY: Under this notice, the FAA announces the submission deadline of

Public Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Los Angeles World Airports Passenger Facility Charge Application at Los Angeles International Airport

Los Angeles World Airports

Los Angeles World Airports

FUTURE PASSENGER PROCESSING. ACRP New Concepts for Airport Terminal Landside Facilities

Dave Allanby GM Operations SOUTH AFRICAN EXPRESS

TEAM OF LAXCEPTIONAL COURTESY. Team of LAXceptional Courtesy Training Tuesday, June 25, :00 p. m. - 2:00 p.m.

BOARD ITO Aide REPORT TO THE AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

Evaluation of Strategic and Tactical Runway Balancing*

TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

LAX Specific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) Final EIR and Related Actions. Board of Airport Commissioners February 5, 2013

WHERE SHOULD WE EXPAND AIRPORT CAPACITY IN METRO LA? December 11, Jacki Murdock, Transportation and Environmental Planner

CLASS SPECIFICATION 5/12/11 SENIOR AIRPORT ENGINEER, CODE 7257

Problem 07 Hub and Spoke

a p 0.4 f Ai RPORT COMMISSIONERS Meeting Date: \ Sk 0 /1ci / 1/1'/V BOARD..ii REPORT TO THE -...r "V:4'

NORTHERN ROCKIES REGIONAL AIRPORT Terminal Expansion ANALYSIS 31 st August 2012

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT INDIA S PERSPECTIVE. Vineet Gulati GM(ATM-IPG), AAI

FACILITATION (FAL) DIVISION TWELFTH SESSION. Cairo, Egypt, 22 March to 2 April 2004

OPERATING DIRECTIVE Number: D Aviation Authority Revised: 03/25/15

Chico Municipal Airport» About Chico Airport» JetChico (Hyperlinks to the JetChico and Chico Airport Websites needed here.) Airline Travel Bank

Pre-Coordination Runway Scheduling Limits Winter 2014

Appendix 6.1: Hazard Worksheet

Gerry Laderman SVP Finance, Procurement and Treasurer

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.


Capacity Planning Overview

Dallas Love Field Update. Dallas City Council Briefing February 18, 2015

SPADE-2 - Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-making and Efficiency Analysis Phase 2

Terminal Space and Ratemaking

FACILITATION PANEL (FALP)

SECTION 6 - SEPARATION STANDARDS

NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO PROPOSED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION NOVEMBER 9 TH, 2018

AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE

NextGen: New Technology for Improved Noise Mitigation Efforts: DFW RNAV Departure Procedures

The offers operators increased capacity while taking advantage of existing airport infrastructure. aero quarterly qtr_03 10

DRAFT. Master Plan RESPONSIBLY GROWING to support our region. Summary

Investor Update Issue Date: April 9, 2018

Runway Scheduling Limits Summer 2015

Analysis of Gaming Issues in Collaborative Trajectory Options Program (CTOP)

::f BOA OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS REPORT TO THE. -A. A_ A.4k fig

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Midfield Satellite Concourse (MSC)

OPERATING DIRECTIVE Number: D Aviation Authority Revised: 05/26/16

Abruzzo Airport. Commercial Policy Development Routes

Kansas City Aviation Department. Update to Airport Committee Customer Service

Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Orlando International Airport One Jeff Fuqua Boulevard Orlando, Florida Memorandum TO: FROM:

This section sets forth all Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) noise abatement procedures, restrictions, and regulations involving aircraft operations.

International Civil Aviation Organization HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE ON AVIATION SECURITY (HLCAS) Montréal, 12 to 14 September 2012

TWELFTH WORKING PAPER. AN-Conf/12-WP/137. International ICAO. developing RNAV 1.1. efficiency. and terminal In line.

NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES

The IMPACT of the DOT REGULATIONS as to TARMAC DELAYS on AIR CARRIERS AND AIRPORTS. Katherine Staton Jackson Walker L.L.P.

Consider problems and make specific recommendations concerning the provision of ATS/AIS/SAR in the Asia Pacific Region LOST COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES

LAX Specific Plan Amendment Study (SPAS) Update. December 3, 2012

CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES

Aircraft Staging & Parking Plan

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Airside $907M

Generic OpSpec A332 - DRAFT

` /1- -O " T BOARD COMMISSIONERS REPORT. /) /n/1 Reviewed for Date Approval Status By ity Atto TO THE. r a. .-.rila

USE OF RADAR IN THE APPROACH CONTROL SERVICE

Grow Transfer Incentive Scheme

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

PPR REGULATIONS FOR BUSINESS AND GENERAL AVIATION AT EINDHOVEN AIRPORT

PART D SECTION 2 STAND ALLOCATION

Certification Memorandum. Large Aeroplane Evacuation Certification Specifications Cabin Crew Members Assumed to be On Board

NDC is a response to 3 challenges that exist in today s airline distribution eco-system:

Terms of Reference for a rulemaking task. Implementation of Evidence-Based Training within the European regulatory framework RMT.0696 ISSUE

I R UNDERGRADUATE REPORT. National Aviation System Congestion Management. by Sahand Karimi Advisor: UG

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Coral Springs Charter High School and Middle School Job No Page 2

NAM/CAR Regional Safety/Air Navigation/Aviation Security Implementation Matters 5.2 Effectiveness of air navigation implementation mechanisms

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION

Airline Schedule Development Overview Dr. Peter Belobaba

GENERAL REPORT. Reduced Lateral Separation Minima RLatSM Phase 2. RLatSM Phase 3

Benefits Analysis of a Runway Balancing Decision-Support Tool

FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED AIRPORTS Velocity FIDS

BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS

RELEASE RECORD. Version Date Author Notes Dec 2006 SK Initial Release

Hamburg Airport Airport Charges Part II

BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

FAA Surface CDM. Collaborative Decision Making and Airport Operations. Date: September 25-27, 2017

Collaboration for best Passenger Experience Check-In of the Future Enhancing the Passenger Experience

Consumer Council for Northern Ireland response to Department for Transport Developing a sustainable framework for UK aviation: Scoping document

System Oriented Runway Management: A Research Update

Subpart H. 2042/2003

Citi Industrials Conference

Traffic Flow Management

SAN JOSÉ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

LFPG / Paris-Charles de Gaulle / CDG

SPRINGFIELD-BRANSON NATIONAL AIRPORT. Irregular Operations (IROPS) Contingency Plan STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

For personal use only

CLEARANCE INSTRUCTION READ BACK

LAX Community Noise Roundtable. Aviation Noise News Update. July 8, 2015

THE FIRST CHOICE FOR FREQUENT TRAVELERS

AIR TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT

Planning and Usage Regulations Handling Desks

2018 Service Changes Ada County

Packaging Tomorrow s Aviation System

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Transcription:

LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS LAX AIRPORT OPERATIONS TBIT TICKET COUNTER ASSIGNMENT POLICY Effective October 2015 REVISION 1 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 2016 Jacqueline Yaft Executive Deputy Director, LAWA - Airport Operations & Emergency Management Date: November 2016 1

TBIT TICKET COUNTER ASSIGNMENT POLICY CURRENT PRACTICE The following procedures are currently used to assign ticket counter positions: 1. LAWA Gate Management team plans and assigns advance common use ticket counter positions based on schedules submitted by airlines operating in the Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT). 2. LAWA Gate Control in the ARCC manages any required daily adjustments to counter assignments. 3. LAWA GATE Management team utilizes an assignment protocol that includes: a) Number of allocated ticket counter positions based on aircraft group and seat configuration b) Ticket counter positions assigned for a period of 4 hours prior departure c) Location of ticket counter assigned in proximity to airlines ATO offices d) Two or more flights operated by the same airline or co-managed by partner airlines assigned a consolidated block of ticket counter positions and co-located in one aisle. e) Counter allocation for transit flights. REQUISITES FOR CHANGE The introduction of new airlines and new flights (Introduced by existing TBIT airlines) have placed an increased demand on available resources. Further, Airline Alliances expressed a desire to co-locate ticket counter assignments to facilitate synergies from partner airline operations. Therefore, it became necessary to not only review current allocation practices but also introduce technology solutions to drive efficiencies in passenger processing. The current technology solution is the installation of SITA common use passenger processing kiosks located on the east end of each ticket counter aisle. Even through the review process, there is continued emphasis on providing each airline with an appropriate number of ticket counters that appropriately reflect the number of passengers being entertained at airlines ticket counter positions and the throughput on passenger processing. COUNTER ALLOCATION POLICY Effective November, 2016, the following ticket counter allocation policy will be adopted. 2

1. Authority: a) LAWA GATE Management team in collaboration with TBITEC will continue to develop and provide resource allocation policy. b) LAWA Gate Management team will plan and assign common use ticket counter positions based on schedules submitted by the airlines. c) LAWA Gate Control in the ARCC will manage day to day counter allocation requirements. 2. Methodology: a) Counter positions will be allocated for a period of 240 minutes prior to departure. b) All airlines operating at TBIT will be assigned a base allocation of four (4) ticket counters irrespective of aircraft size, seat configuration, or passenger counts. c) A principle of add-on positions to the base allocation will be adopted to provide adequate number of positions for larger counts of passenger processing. See table directly below for final allocations. d) Multiple flights with departure times within 90 minutes are expected to consolidate processing and will be assigned a modified add-on number of ticket counters. e) During periods of high demand airlines may be required to scale down the number of ticket counters during the last 30-45 minutes prior departure but at no time will this be less than four (4) counter positions. 3

3. RULES AND EXCEPTIONS a) Transit flights: All transit flights will be allocated the base allocation of four (4) ticket counters. b) Multiple flights within the 90 minute period with different aircraft type and seat capacity will receive a final allocation which is a derivative of the average seat counts of the flights involved. 4. ALLIANCE GROUPS CO-LOCATION Alliance groups have initiated a co-location concept for member airlines operating out of a common location. This means that members of a particular alliance may be located within one aisle of the TBIT ticket lobby. a) The number of ticket counter positions allocated to alliance members flight will be determined using the methodology described above. This methodology is applicable to all flights operating from TBIT. b) In order to provide for airlines that are not affiliated with any Alliance groups, the ticket counter positions assigned to a co-located Alliance group will not occupy the entire aisle. c) Airline Alliance groups will be allocated an appropriate number of ticket counter positions that is aligned with their market share of seats in the Terminal. d) An Alliance Group co-locating in one aisle is not intended to imply an opportunity for branding. e) A review of the ticket counter allocations for Alliance Groups will be reviewed during each seasonal change in schedule. f) Schedule changes, seasonal flights, or additional Alliance partners starting operations in TBIT, are likely to create a shortfall in counter positions per this protocol. Such situations will be resolved through: i. Relocation to an alternate aisle if positions are available; or ii. Reduction of allocated positions to accommodate change. If relocation or assignment to an alternate aisle is necessary (Item i), then the determination on assigning ticket counters will be based on following order of priorities 4

1. The flight with a schedule change, if single flight is involved. 2. Flights with schedule change with less weekly frequency, when multiple flights are involved. 3. Seasonal flights operated by year round airlines 4. Seasonal flights operated by seasonal airlines 5. New alliance members launching operations from TBIT. 6. New alliance members launching operations from TBIT with less weekly frequencies 7. Security requirements 8. Basic aisle congestion With the reduction alternative (Item ii), the Alliance group will propose the desired reduction in counter assignment to accommodate the oversubscribed flight in the same aisle. g) At this point, LAWA Commercial Development Group makes no commitment to relocating Alliance members ATO offices to coincide with the ticket counter allocations. 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: END a) Additional ticket counter positions or extended hours at assigned ticket counter positions will be assessed on a case by case basis and approved if the request can be accommodated. Airlines must be prepared to comply with assignments provided per protocol described above. b) Any change to ticket counter position assignments on the day of operation must be coordinated through Gate Control in the ARCC. c) Ticket counter position assignments of a delayed flight (with prior delay notice), may be changed to avoid impacting adjacent operation of a scheduled on-time flight. The scheduled on-time flight will have priority. d) Ticket counter position assignments of a delayed flight (without prior delay notice), may be required to close operations at assigned positions if the operation impedes on another airline s operation. Alternate ticket counter assignments for continued operations will be made by ARCC Gate Control. 5