RTA ScoreCard December 2009

Similar documents
Transit Peer Comparison

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Board of Directors Information Summary

Lower Income Journey to Work Market Share From American Community Survey

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

Bristol Virginia Transit

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

RTD s Performance Management System

Chapter 1 Introduction

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION INTRODUCTION

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. February 13, 2018

BLACK KNIGHT HPI REPORT

Marketing and Passenger Demographics

PTN-128 Reporting Manual Data Collection and Performance Reporting

CCTA Peer Analysis. June 2014

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Mobile Farebox Repair Program: Setting Standards & Maximizing Regained Revenue

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Berkshire Flyer Working Group. January 30, 2018

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

Peer Performance Measurement February 2019 Prepared by the Division of Planning & Market Development

Planning, Engineering & Construction Department September 2017

Fixed-Route Operational and Financial Review

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

Access Across America: Transit 2014

OB-GYN Workload & Potential Shortages: The Coming U.S. Women s Health Crisis

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.gzz.2000 Tel I Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net

The FMR history file contains the following fields, all for 2-bedroom FMRs. It is in EXCEL format for easy use with database or spreadsheet programs.

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

1 DEMAND RESPONSE OVERVIEW

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT DECEMBER 2015

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2017

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

REVIEW OF SUN METRO LIFT SERVICES

Investor Update April 22, 2008

Location, Location, Location. 19 th Annual NIC Conference NIC MAP Data & Analysis Service

A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

Investor Update October 23, 2007

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

International migration. Total net migration. Domestic migration

St. Johns County Transit Development Plan Update

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Investor Update July 24, 2007

YOSEMITE AREA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

VCTC Transit Ridership and Performance Measures Quarterly Report

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

Performance Measurement:

LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation December 2004

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

SAMTRANS TITLE VI STANDARDS AND POLICIES

FY Year End Performance Report

Fare Revenue Report 2016 FARE REVENUE REPORT

Maryland Department of Transportation The Secretary's Office

Higher Education in America s Metropolitan Areas A Statistical Profile

Investor Update July 22, 2008

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Investor Update April 24, 2007

Appendix D: Aggregation Error for New England Metro Areas and for Places

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2017

All Door Boarding Title VI Service Fare Analysis. Appendix P.3

SAMTRANS SERVICE PLAN

10TH ANNUAL WOLFE RESEARCH GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE MAY 23, 2017

NATIONAL EXPRESS GROUP PLC AN OVERVIEW

Laredo Transit Development Plan

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

A Public Transportation Review Evaluating Metro s Operational Efficiency, Service Capacity and Fiscal Impact

Transport Indicators Report June 2018

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Services Utilization Study

Berkshire Flyer Working Group

The 15-day comment period will run from Thursday, April 4, 2019 to 4pm on Wednesday April 18, 2019.

Prior to reviewing the various performances of Red Apple Transit, it is important to point out some key terminology, including:

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

MAKING PERFORMANCE MEASURES MATTER

Major US City Preparedness For an Oil Crisis Which Cities and Metro Areas are Best Prepared for $4 a Gallon Gas and Beyond?

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

DRAFT Service Implementation Plan

STUDY PROCESS. Study. PHASE I Research. PHASE II Develop & Analyze Options. PHASE III Recommendations. Regional Transit

Annual Route Report Operating Data. Prepared for: Board of Directors. Final 4/26/2018

Business Intelligence Development at Winnipeg Transit

Massachusetts Acute Hospital and Health System Financial Performance Fiscal Year Data through March 31, 2017

Ozaukee County Transit Development Plan

Transcription:

Background and Context RTA ScoreCard December 2009 Chapter 25 of the Acts of 2009 modernized the transportation systems of the Commonwealth and created the new MassDOT. Section 6 of this law established a MassDOT Office of Performance Measurement and Innovation, and requires the public performance reporting for all transportation operations, including the Regional Transit Authorities (RTAs). The Regional Transit Authorities (RTAs) continue to be independent entities under the new law, under the jurisdiction of MassDOT and its Rail & Transit Division. MassDOT is responsible for statewide transportation planning. This includes support of the RTA operations, managing the efficient programming of all resources, and facilitating regional and state-wide mobility objectives. For the RTAs in Massachusetts, this is the first Performance Report. These reports will be published annually. This document presents data from the most recent FY2008 (FY08). All of the data herein was collected and reported to the National Transit Database (NTD) using Federal Transit Administration (FTA) definitions, protocols and requirements for Reporting Year 2008 (RY08). The state FY08 is identical to the NTD RY08 both include the months of July 2007 through June 2008. The RTA services are provided by two transit modes fixed route and demand response. Fixed route service operates on predetermined routes at scheduled times, and generally uses larger vehicles, with most buses able to carry at least 15 passengers. Meanwhile, demand response trips are dispatched on a request basis generally 24 hours in advance of travel passengers still typically share the ride with others, but in smaller vehicles which often have a capacity of 15 people or fewer. Demand response includes paratransit trips. Data sources: The General Court has stated its commitment to public transparency and accountability with the sweeping changes made under Chapter 25 of the Acts of 2009. MassDOT incorporated these recent changes into its stated goals: Through a culture of innovation and accountability we will deliver the most efficient transportation services and information possible. Efforts to date include identifying reliable and audited transit data sources. MassDOT now uses the Federal Transit Administration s National Transit Database, or NTD. The NTD has become the performance data standard across the industry and allows over 660 public and private agencies to report with greater data resolution in the areas of operations, capital investment and resource utilization. The NTD is a Federal requirement for each grantee to file, certify and audit its own performance data submissions using a well-defined set of definitions, metrics and service elements that is common to all transit operators. While limitations may arise when using a national standard, the NTD will allow MassDOT and the RTAs to view our operations performance not only amongst ourselves, but with national peers as well. Through regular, measured and honest assessments of our transit operations, we can work together to invest the needed capital and service in our statewide public transportation networks to ensure that Massachusetts is an industry leader in providing public transportation services. This first set of performance data will be used to establish a baseline. Information from subsequent years will be compared and valuable trend assessments can be made to ensure the each RTA is performing optimally within its unique service environment. As the measurements evolve, setting specific goals may be appropriate for the various types of service offered by each RTA. Beginning with FY2011, state funding to each RTA for operating assistance will be based in part on some of the performance measures collected by the NTD in this report. It is important to note that each RTA is a unique collection of customers, communities, service routes, history, market demographics, Board of Directors, physical plant, fleet and topography. While it is natural to compare RTAs against each other, it is often more valuable to view an RTA against itself over a period of time. Additionally, regional

and national peer agencies can provide a better proxy of performance measure. MassDOT planning has begun and will continue to expand this peer performance during the year. Overview: The Massachusetts Public Transit Network The RTAs play a significant role in the Massachusetts transportation network (see Table 1). Over 29 million passenger trips were taken in 2008 aboard a fleet of nearly 1,400 vehicles operating over 30 million revenue service miles. If all of the RTAs were a single transit system, it would be the 33rd largest in the United States (see Table 2). The largest RTA, Pioneer Valley Transit Authority (PVTA), is the 59 th largest system in the country. The Massachusetts RTAs carry more passengers than systems in the sizeable metropolitan areas of Orlando, Buffalo and Charlotte. Table 1 FY2008 RTA System Operating Summary Measure Fixed route Demand response Total Ridership 27,026,590 2,024,320 29,050,910 Vehicle Miles 17,622,159 13,267,186 30,889,345 Vehicle Hours 1,303,957 917,159 2,221,116 Operating cost $ 109,439,504 $ 41,488,693 $ 150,928,197 Fleet 666 706 1,372

The RTAs Table 2 FY2008 Transit Ridership within UZA (millions) Rank Metro Region Ridership 28 San Jose, CA 40.9 29 Salt Lake City, UT 38.6 30 Austin, TX 35.4 31 Sacramento, CA 34.7 32 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 29.3 33 Massachusetts RTAs 29.0 34 Orlando, FL 25.3 35 Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL 24.9 36 Virginia Beach, VA 24.0 37 Buffalo, NY 23.8 38 Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 22.7 39 Charlotte, NC-SC 21.2 40 Providence, RI-MA 21.2 41 Tucson, AZ 17.8 42 Hartford, CT 16.3 There are 15 RTAs in Massachusetts. The table below provides a brief description of each RTA s service area. A full map of the service areas is provided in Appendix A. RTA Full Name Service Area BRTA Berkshire Regional Transit Authority 23 communities in western MA, including Pittsfield BAT Brockton Area Transit Authority 9 communities in the Greater Brockton area CATA Cape Ann Transportation Authority 4 communities on the North Shore CCRTA Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority 15 communities on Cape Cod FRTA Franklin Regional Transit Authority 40 rural communities in 4 counties GATRA Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority 26 communities including the South Shore LRTA Lowell Regional Transit Authority 13 communities in the Greater Lowell area VTA Martha s Vineyard Regional Transit Authority 6 communities on the island of Martha s Vineyard MVRTA Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority 15 communities including Lawrence and Haverhill MWRTA MetroWest Regional Transit Authority 11 communities including Framingham and Natick MART Montachusett Regional Transit Authority 21 communities including Fitchburg and Leominster NRTA Nantucket Regional Transit Authority Island of Nantucket PVTA Pioneer Valley Transit Authority 24 communities including Springfield and Amherst SRTA Southeastern Regional Transit Authority 10 communities including Fall River and New Bedford WRTA Worcester Regional Transit Authority 36 communities in the Greater Worcester area

Basic Performance Data This section shows measurements of ridership, the amount of transit service supplied, and financial information for each RTA and each mode of service. Unlinked Passenger Trips (UPT) UPT RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 496,300 55,200 551,500 BAT 2,680,500 200,300 2,880,800 CATA 241,000 36,600 277,600 CCRTA 428,600 369,200 797,800 FRTA 126,585 55,536 182,121 GATRA 746,300 188,800 935,100 LRTA 1,308,500 96,200 1,404,700 VTA 1,031,197 13,739 1,044,936 MVRTA 2,162,200 48,500 2,210,700 MWRTA 497,400 9,300 506,700 MART 602,200 282,400 884,600 NRTA 251,008 10,045 261,053 PVTA 11,741,400 308,800 12,050,200 SRTA 1,611,000 89,700 1,700,700 WRTA 3,102,400 260,000 3,362,400 TOTAL 27,026,590 2,024,320 29,050,910 Note: MWRTA fixed-route UPT may actually be less than shown MWRTA has requested that NTD revise the data. Measures: The number of passengers who board agency vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board a vehicle. Passengers making multi-vehicle connections are counted for each segment they travel. Application: Increases in general UPT are positive as it is an indication of increased utilization of the system. Impact: Increases in UPT on fixed route bus services can be generally met with existing service. Increases in UPT on the demand response system generally result in an increase of cost to the agency. Performance: The fixed route bus system carries substantially more passengers than the demand response system.

Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) VRM RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 832,000 318,700 1,150,700 BAT 1,327,100 834,700 2,161,800 CATA 320,100 179,300 499,400 CCRTA 1,040,600 2,711,100 3,751,700 FRTA 281,576 511,329 792,905 GATRA 1,875,200 1,080,600 2,955,800 LRTA 1,115,200 449,900 1,565,100 VTA 858,546 76,752 935,298 MVRTA 1,508,400 381,100 1,889,500 MWRTA 492,500 40,000 532,500 MART 825,700 1,345,800 2,171,500 NRTA 192,737 32,805 225,542 PVTA 4,161,900 3,301,800 7,463,700 SRTA 1,222,400 499,600 1,722,000 WRTA 1,568,200 1,503,700 3,071,900 TOTAL 17,622,159 13,267,186 30,889,345 Measures: The number of miles that vehicles actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue miles include: Layover / recovery time But exclude: Deadhead Operator training, and Vehicle maintenance testing, as well as School bus and charter services. Application: Increases in general VRM are positive as it is an indication of increased service being delivered to the public. Impact: Increases in miles have operating cost impacts as VRM is directly related to fuel consumption and labor utilization. Performance: The number of miles operated by the demand response system are substantial when compared to the fixed route system.

Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH) VRH RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 43,500 38,600 82,100 BAT 118,800 73,300 192,100 CATA 20,000 10,300 30,300 CCRTA 83,500 138,200 221,700 FRTA 15,595 30,228 45,823 GATRA 86,700 76,200 162,900 LRTA 73,500 35,900 109,400 VTA 57,253 5,214 62,467 MVRTA 122,600 32,000 154,600 MWRTA 42,000 5,800 47,800 MART 67,000 110,200 177,200 NRTA 17,009 3,817 20,826 PVTA 325,300 191,800 517,100 SRTA 95,200 47,700 142,900 WRTA 136,000 117,900 253,900 TOTAL 1,303,957 917,159 2,221,116 Measures: The hours that vehicles actually travel while in revenue service. Vehicle revenue hours include: Layover / recovery time But exclude: Deadhead Operator training, and Vehicle maintenance testing, as well as School bus and charter services. Application: Increases in VRH are positive as it is an indication of increased service being delivered to the public. However, traffic congestion and delays that cause bus schedules to be adjusted often increase VRH with little benefit. Impact: Increases in hours have operating cost impacts as VRH is directly related to fuel consumption, engine and tire wear and labor utilization. Performance: The number of hours operated by the demand response system are substantial when compared to the fixed route system.

Operating Expenses (OE) RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 4,120,000 $ 1,280,700 $ 5,400,700 BAT $ 9,580,700 $ 3,427,300 $ 13,008,000 CATA $ 1,731,200 $ 769,600 $ 2,500,800 CCRTA $ 4,486,900 $ 6,587,000 $ 11,073,900 FRTA $ 1,561,084 $ 450,226 $ 2,011,310 GATRA $ 6,332,400 $ 4,113,100 $ 10,445,500 LRTA $ 7,069,700 $ 1,499,000 $ 8,568,700 VTA $ 3,069,923 $ 439,405 $ 3,509,328 MVRTA $ 9,850,500 $ 1,365,400 $ 11,215,900 MWRTA $ 2,155,200 $ 2,141,100 $ 4,296,300 MART $ 6,165,500 $ 3,807,500 $ 9,973,000 NRTA $ 1,391,497 $ 201,462 $ 1,592,959 PVTA $ 28,282,600 $ 7,761,300 $ 36,043,900 SRTA $ 9,552,700 $ 2,482,100 $ 12,034,800 WRTA $ 14,089,600 $ 5,163,500 $ 19,253,100 $ TOTAL $ 109,439,504 $ 41,488,693 150,928,197 Note: FRTA expenses may be allocated incorrectly between fixed-route and demand response accounting policies were subsequently revised. MWRTA demand response expenses appear to be incorrect, and may be revised downward. OE Measures: The expenses associated with the operation of the transit agency, and classified by function or activity, and the goods and services purchased. The basic functions and object classes are defined in Section 5.2 and 6.2 of the Uniform System of Accounts (USOA). These are consumable items with a useful life of less than one year or an acquisition cost of less than $5,000. Application: Increases in operating expenses can be caused by service expansion, inflation, labor rate increases or reduced efficiencies. Impact: Increases in operating expenses will require additional passenger revenues, or subsidy. Performance: The operating expenses required by the demand response system are substantial when compared to the number of passengers.

Fare Revenues $ RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 667,578 $ 310,339 $ 977,917 BAT $ 2,258,499 $ 826,946 $ 3,085,445 CATA $ 196,333 $ 32,945 $ 229,278 CCRTA $ 281,458 $ 769,154 $ 1,050,612 FRTA $ 95,176 $ 267,697 $ 362,873 GATRA $ 1,828,410 $ 205,410 $ 2,033,820 LRTA $ 938,400 $ 108,657 $ 1,047,057 VTA $ 1,166,986 $ 13,369 $ 1,180,355 MVRTA $ 1,167,515 $ 133,130 $ 1,300,645 MWRTA $ 488,145 $ 144,056 $ 632,201 MART $ 745,763 $ 513,394 $ 1,259,157 NRTA $ 363,576 $ 8,727 $ 372,303 PVTA $ 4,982,049 $ 491,739 $ 5,473,788 SRTA $ 1,226,109 $ 525,475 $ 1,751,584 WRTA $ 2,243,355 $ 312,337 $ 2,555,692 TOTAL $ 18,649,352 $ 4,663,375 $ 23,312,727 Note: MWRTA demand response revenue may need revision. Measures: All income received directly from passengers, either paid in cash or through pre-paid tickets, passes, etc. Application: Setting appropriate fares balances the need for users to help support the operating costs with the need to keep service affordable. Impact: Increases in fare revenues moderate the need for operating subsidy and support increases in operating expenses. Performance: The fare revenues generated by the fixed route system are substantial when compared to the demand response system.

Derived Performance Data From the five categories of basic data listed above, useful calculations can be performed, in order to highlight various aspects of the transit services. Fare Revenues Per Passenger Trip $ / UPT RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 1.35 $ 5.62 $ 1.77 BAT $ 0.84 $ 4.13 $ 1.07 CATA $ 0.81 $ 0.90 $ 0.83 CCRTA $ 0.66 $ 2.08 $ 1.32 FRTA $ 0.75 $ 4.82 $ 1.99 GATRA $ 2.45 $ 1.09 $ 2.17 LRTA $ 0.72 $ 1.13 $ 0.75 VTA $ 1.13 $ 0.97 $ 1.13 MVRTA $ 0.54 $ 2.74 $ 0.59 MWRTA $ 0.98 $ 15.49 $ 1.25 MART $ 1.24 $ 1.82 $ 1.42 NRTA $ 1.45 $ 0.87 $ 1.43 PVTA $ 0.42 $ 1.59 $ 0.45 SRTA $ 0.76 $ 5.86 $ 1.03 WRTA $ 0.72 $ 1.20 $ 0.76 TOTAL $ 0.69 $ 2.30 $ 0.80 Measures: The average fare revenues per unlinked passenger trip. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: RTAs with substantial paratransit services will generally have higher overall fares per trip, since demand response fares are often higher than for fixed route services. Performance: The RTA average is $0.80 fare per boarding. The lowest fare collected is PVTA at $0.45, and the highest is GATRA at $2.17 per boarding. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. Fare Revenue per Trip $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA Average

Operating Expenses per Passenger Trip OE / UPT RTA Fixed Route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 8.30 $ 23.20 $ 9.79 BAT $ 3.57 $ 17.11 $ 4.52 CATA $ 7.18 $ 21.03 $ 9.01 CCRTA $ 10.47 $ 17.84 $ 13.88 FRTA $ 12.33 $ 8.11 $ 11.04 GATRA $ 8.49 $ 21.79 $ 11.17 LRTA $ 5.40 $ 15.58 $ 6.10 VTA $ 2.98 $ 31.98 $ 3.36 MVRTA $ 4.56 $ 28.15 $ 5.07 MWRTA $ 4.33 $ 230.23 $ 8.48 MART $ 10.24 $ 13.48 $ 11.27 NRTA $ 5.54 $ 20.06 $ 6.10 PVTA $ 2.41 $ 25.13 $ 2.99 SRTA $ 5.93 $ 27.67 $ 7.08 WRTA $ 4.54 $ 19.86 $ 5.73 TOTAL $ 4.05 $ 20.50 $ 5.20 Measures: The average operating expenses per unlinked passenger trip. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: RTAs with substantial paratransit services will perform lower than average, due to lower operating expenses per passenger associated with fixed route services. Performance: The RTA average cost is $5.20 per passenger. The lowest cost is PVTA at $2.99, and the highest is CCRTA at $13.88 per boarding. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. Operating Expense per Trip $16.00 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA Average

Fare Revenues per Mile $ / VRM RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 0.80 $ 0.97 $ 0.85 BAT $ 1.70 $ 0.99 $ 1.43 CATA $ 0.61 $ 0.18 $ 0.46 CCRTA $ 0.27 $ 0.28 $ 0.28 FRTA $ 0.34 $ 0.52 $ 0.46 GATRA $ 0.98 $ 0.19 $ 0.69 LRTA $ 0.84 $ 0.24 $ 0.67 VTA $ 1.36 $ 0.17 $ 1.26 MVRTA $ 0.77 $ 0.35 $ 0.69 MWRTA $ 0.99 $ 3.60 $ 1.19 MART $ 0.90 $ 0.38 $ 0.58 NRTA $ 1.89 $ 0.27 $ 1.65 PVTA $ 1.20 $ 0.15 $ 0.73 SRTA $ 1.00 $ 1.05 $ 1.02 WRTA $ 1.43 $ 0.21 $ 0.83 TOTAL $ 1.06 $ 0.35 $ 0.75 Measures: The average fare revenue generated per vehicle revenue mile. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: This is generally viewed as a measure of network productivity and of how effectively the transit network is scheduled and designed. Performance: The RTA average revenue per mile is $0.75 per mile. The most productive is NRTA at $1.65, and the least is CCRTA at $0.28 per mile. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. Fare Revenue per Mile $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA Average

Operating Expenses per Mile OE / VRM RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 4.95 $ 4.02 $ 4.69 BAT $ 7.22 $ 4.11 $ 6.02 CATA $ 5.41 $ 4.29 $ 5.01 CCRTA $ 4.31 $ 2.43 $ 2.95 FRTA $ 5.54 $ 0.88 $ 2.54 GATRA $ 3.38 $ 3.81 $ 3.53 LRTA $ 6.34 $ 3.33 $ 5.47 VTA $ 3.58 $ 5.72 $ 3.75 MVRTA $ 6.53 $ 3.58 $ 5.94 MWRTA $ 4.38 $ 53.53 $ 8.07 MART $ 7.47 $ 2.83 $ 4.59 NRTA $ 7.22 $ 6.14 $ 7.06 PVTA $ 6.80 $ 2.35 $ 4.83 SRTA $ 7.81 $ 4.97 $ 6.99 Measures: The average operating expense per vehicle revenue mile. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: This is one measure of the efficiency of providing service in this case, fixed route costs more per mile because of larger vehicles. Performance: The RTA average cost per mile is $4.89. The lowest is FRTA at $2.54, and the highest is MWRTA at $8.07 per mile. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. WRTA $ 8.98 $ 3.43 $ 6.27 TOTAL $ 6.21 $ 3.13 $ 4.89 Operating Expense per Mile $9.00 $8.00 $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA Average MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA

Fare Revenues per Hour $ / VRH RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 15.35 $ 8.04 $ 11.91 BAT $ 19.01 $ 11.28 $ 16.06 CATA $ 9.82 $ 3.20 $ 7.57 CCRTA $ 3.37 $ 5.57 $ 4.74 FRTA $ 6.10 $ 8.86 $ 7.92 GATRA $ 21.09 $ 2.70 $ 12.49 LRTA $ 12.77 $ 3.03 $ 9.57 VTA $ 20.38 $ 2.56 $ 18.90 MVRTA $ 9.52 $ 4.16 $ 8.41 MWRTA $ 11.62 $ 24.84 $ 13.23 MART $ 11.13 $ 4.66 $ 7.11 NRTA $ 21.38 $ 2.29 $ 17.88 PVTA $ 15.32 $ 2.56 $ 10.59 SRTA $ 12.88 $ 11.02 $ 12.26 WRTA $ 16.50 $ 2.65 $ 10.07 Measures: The average fare revenue generated per vehicle revenue hour. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: This is generally viewed as a measure of network productivity and of how effectively the transit network is scheduled and designed. Performance: The RTA average revenue per hour is $10.50. The most productive is VTA at $18.90, and the least is CCRTA at $4.74 per hour. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. TOTAL $ 14.30 $ 5.08 $ 10.50 Fare Revenue per Hour $20.00 $18.00 $16.00 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA Average

Operating Expenses per Hour OE / VRH RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA $ 94.71 $ 33.18 $ 65.78 BAT $ 80.65 $ 46.76 $ 67.71 CATA $ 86.56 $ 74.72 $ 82.53 CCRTA $ 53.74 $ 47.66 $ 49.95 FRTA $ 100.10 $ 14.89 $ 43.89 GATRA $ 73.04 $ 53.98 $ 64.12 LRTA $ 96.19 $ 41.75 $ 78.32 VTA $ 53.62 $ 84.27 $ 56.18 MVRTA $ 80.35 $ 42.67 $ 72.55 MWRTA $ 51.31 $ 369.16 $ 89.88 MART $ 92.02 $ 34.55 $ 56.28 NRTA $ 81.81 $ 52.78 $ 76.49 PVTA $ 86.94 $ 40.47 $ 69.70 SRTA $ 100.34 $ 52.04 $ 84.22 WRTA $ 103.60 $ 43.80 $ 75.83 TOTAL $ 83.93 $ 45.24 $ 67.95 Measures: The average operating expense per vehicle revenue hour. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: This is another measure of the efficiency of providing service again fixed route costs more per hour because of larger vehicles. Performance: The RTA average cost per hour is $67.95. The lowest is FRTA at $43.89, and the highest is MWRTA at $89.88 per hour. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. Operating Expense per Hour $100.00 $90.00 $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $- BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA Average MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA

Farebox Recovery Ratio $ / OE RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 16.2% 24.2% 18.1% BAT 23.6% 24.1% 23.7% CATA 11.3% 4.3% 9.2% CCRTA 6.3% 11.7% 9.5% FRTA 6.1% 59.5% 18.0% GATRA 28.9% 5.0% 19.5% LRTA 13.3% 7.2% 12.2% VTA 38.0% 3.0% 33.6% MVRTA 11.9% 9.8% 11.6% MWRTA 22.6% 6.7% 14.7% MART 12.1% 13.5% 12.6% NRTA 26.1% 4.3% 23.4% PVTA 17.6% 6.3% 15.2% SRTA 12.8% 21.2% 14.6% WRTA 15.9% 6.0% 13.3% TOTAL 17.0% 11.2% 15.4% Measures: The percentage of operating expenses that are paid by passenger fares. Application: Performance is generally reviewed against the average for all operators. Impact: This measure combines fare policy with efficiency and ridership. Performance: The RTA average farebox recovery is 15.4%. The lowest is CATA at 9.2%, and the highest is VTA at 33.6%. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA. Farebox Recovery Ratio 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% BRTA BAT CATA CCRTA FRTA GATRA LRTA VTA MVRTA MWRTA MART NRTA PVTA SRTA WRTA Average

Other Data This section lists information which does not measure performance directly, but which is related to and can affect performance. Included are fleet size, population, ridership per capita, and sources of funding. Vehicles Available for Maximum Service (VAM) VAM RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 21 26 47 BAT 51 41 92 CATA 17 11 28 CCRTA 36 59 95 FRTA 21 31 52 GATRA 49 62 111 LRTA 47 28 75 VTA 30 5 35 MVRTA 52 20 72 MWRTA 10 11 21 MART 31 129 160 NRTA 17 4 21 PVTA 179 140 319 SRTA 59 24 83 WRTA 46 115 161 TOTAL 666 706 1372 Measures: The fleet size available for peak amounts of service. Application: Fleet size is a significant indicator of capital funding needs, since many capital expenses are vehicle-related, including garage and storage facilities. Impact: Fleet size, along with funding for vehicle operators, determines the frequency of service that can be provided at peak times. Performance: Although it carries far fewer passengers, the demand response fleet size is as large as the fixed route fleet. However, the fixed route vehicles are larger and last two to three times as long.

Population in Service Area Population RTA Population BRTA 127,500 BAT 221,475 CATA 46,000 CCRTA 268,637 FRTA 110,780 GATRA 98,175 LRTA 320,301 VTA 15,527 MVRTA 306,339 MWRTA 231,198 MART 193,415 NRTA 11,215 PVTA 551,543 SRTA 186,731 WRTA 524,725 Measures: The number of people living in the communities served by each RTA, from the 2000 Census. Application: Since residents who do not use the transit system also benefit from having transit service in the area, these non-users also pay some of the cost through local taxes or fees. Impact: A larger population base provides more potential transit customers, and spreads the local government funding across more people. Performance: PVTA has the largest population at 551,543, while NRTA has the smallest at 11,215. However, Nantucket has a substantial number of visitors, especially in the summer. TOTAL 3,213,561

Ridership per Capita UPT/Population RTA Fixed route Demand Response TOTAL: BRTA 3.9 0.4 4.3 BAT 12.1 0.9 13.0 CATA 5.2 0.8 6.0 CCRTA 1.6 1.4 3.0 FRTA 1.1 0.5 1.6 GATRA 7.6 1.9 9.5 LRTA 4.1 0.3 4.4 VTA 66.4 0.9 67.3 MVRTA 7.1 0.2 7.2 MWRTA 2.2 0.0 2.2 MART 3.1 1.5 4.6 NRTA 22.4 0.9 23.3 PVTA 21.3 0.6 21.8 SRTA 8.6 0.5 9.1 WRTA 5.9 0.5 6.4 TOTAL 8.4 0.6 9.0 Measures: Unlinked passenger trips divided by the residential population in the service area. Application: This is one measure of the degree of transit utilization in communities. Impact: Higher ridership per capita generally means that the transit service is designed to meet the community transportation needs. Performance: Overall ratio can be increased by students or visitors in the service area, such as with summer resorts. Demand response ratio is affected by the percentage of elderly and disabled in the service area. Notes: Some MWRTA and FRTA data may need revision, see notes in Basic Data sections or in Appendix B for MWRTA and FRTA.

Sources of Operating Funds RTA Fare Revenues Local Funds State Funds Federal Funds Other Funds TOTAL: BRTA $977,900 $724,700 $1,939,500 $1,643,100 $115,500 $5,400,700 BAT $3,085,400 $2,111,700 $5,274,100 $2,220,000 $316,700 $13,007,900 CATA $229,300 $370,200 $1,087,200 $404,700 $536,100 $2,627,500 CCRTA $1,050,600 $1,406,400 $3,446,300 $2,122,200 $3,048,400 $11,073,900 FRTA $137,136 $392,921 $780,436 $938,852 $1,993,890 $4,243,235 GATRA $2,033,800 $2,361,600 $2,522,800 $3,234,200 $632,500 $10,784,900 LRTA $1,047,000 $1,712,400 $2,781,900 $2,029,000 $1,279,000 $8,849,300 VTA $1,166,986 $741,002 $1,199,869 $550,000 $152,809 $3,810,666 MVRTA $1,300,600 $1,957,900 $5,566,100 $2,387,800 $472,800 $11,685,200 MWRTA $632,200 $951,900 $2,221,200 $0 $491,000 $4,296,300 MART $1,785,000 $1,543,700 $4,631,000 $1,579,800 $827,200 $10,366,700 NRTA $363,576 $304,129 $438,428 $464,745 $22,081 $1,592,959 PVTA $5,473,800 $6,092,700 $19,581,300 $5,503,200 $869,800 $37,520,800 SRTA $1,751,600 $1,564,100 $4,463,700 $4,031,800 $223,700 $12,034,900 WRTA $2,555,700 $3,327,300 $9,059,000 $4,856,500 $310,800 $20,109,300 TOTAL $23,590,598 $25,562,652 $64,992,833 $31,965,897 $11,292,280 $157,404,260 Note: PVTA states that their State Funds should be revised to $17,289,783. They have requested that NTD make the revision.

Appendix A Map of RTA Service Areas MassDOT RMV Transit Division ScoreCard December 2009 Page 0

Appendix B Performance Data Listed by Individual RTA Berkshire Regional Transit Authority (BRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 496,300 55,200 551,500 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 832,000 318,700 1,150,700 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 43,500 38,600 82,100 Operating Expense (OE) $ 4,120,000 $ 1,280,700 $ 5,400,700 Fare Revenue ($) $ 667,578 $ 310,339 $ 977,917 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $ 1.35 $ 5.62 $ 1.77 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $ 8.30 $ 23.20 $ 9.79 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $ 0.80 $ 0.97 $ 0.85 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $ 4.95 $ 4.02 $ 4.69 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $ 15.35 $ 8.04 $ 11.91 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $ 94.71 $ 33.18 $ 65.78 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 16.2% 24.2% 18.1% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 21 26 47 Ridership per Capita 3.9 0.4 4.3 Other Data Population 127,500 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $977,900 Local Funds $724,700 State Funds $1,939,500 Federal Funds $1,643,100 Other Funds $115,500 TOTAL: $5,400,700

Brockton Area Transit Authority (BAT) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 2,680,500 200,300 2,880,800 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,327,100 834,700 2,161,800 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 118,800 73,300 192,100 Operating Expense (OE) $ 9,580,700 $ 3,427,300 $ 13,008,000 Fare Revenue ($) $ 2,258,499 $ 826,946 $ 3,085,445 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $ 0.84 $ 4.13 $ 1.07 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $ 3.57 $ 17.11 $ 4.52 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $ 1.70 $ 0.99 $ 1.43 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $ 7.22 $ 4.11 $ 6.02 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $ 19.01 $ 11.28 $ 16.06 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $ 80.65 $ 46.76 $ 67.71 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 23.6% 24.1% 23.7% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 51 41 92 Ridership per Capita 12.1 0.9 13.0 Other Data Population 221,475 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $3,085,400 Local Funds $2,111,700 State Funds $5,274,100 Federal Funds $2,220,000 Other Funds $316,700 TOTAL: $13,007,900

Cape Ann Transportation Authority (CATA) Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 241,000 36,600 277,600 Basic Data Derived Data Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 320,100 179,300 499,400 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 20,000 10,300 30,300 Operating Expense (OE) $1,731,200 $769,600 $2,500,800 Fare Revenue ($) $196,333 $32,945 $229,278 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.81 $0.90 $0.83 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $7.18 $21.03 $9.01 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.61 $0.18 $0.46 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $5.41 $4.29 $5.01 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $9.82 $3.20 $7.57 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $86.56 $74.72 $82.53 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 11.3% 4.3% 9.2% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 17 11 28 Ridership per Capita 5.2 0.8 6.0 Other Data Population 46,000 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $229,300 Local Funds $370,200 State Funds $1,087,200 Federal Funds $404,700 Other Funds $536,100 TOTAL: $2,627,500

Cape Cod Regional Transit Authority (CCRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 428,600 369,200 797,800 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,040,600 2,711,100 3,751,700 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 83,500 138,200 221,700 Operating Expense (OE) $4,486,900 $6,587,000 $11,073,900 Fare Revenue ($) $281,458 $769,154 $1,050,612 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.66 $2.08 $1.32 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $10.47 $17.84 $13.88 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.27 $0.28 $0.28 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $4.31 $2.43 $2.95 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $3.37 $5.57 $4.74 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $53.74 $47.66 $49.95 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 6.3% 11.7% 9.5% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 36 59 95 Ridership per Capita 1.6 1.4 3.0 Other Data Population 268,637 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,050,600 Local Funds $1,406,400 State Funds $3,446,300 Federal Funds $2,122,200 Other Funds $3,048,400 TOTAL: $11,073,900

Franklin Regional Transit Authority (FRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 126,585 55,536 182,121 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 281,576 511,329 792,905 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 15,595 30,228 45,823 Operating Expense (OE) $1,561,084 $450,226 $2,011,310 Fare Revenue ($) $95,176 $267,697 $362,873 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.75 $4.82 $1.99 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $12.33 $8.11 $11.04 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.34 $0.52 $0.46 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $5.54 $0.88 $2.54 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $6.10 $8.86 $7.92 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $100.10 $14.89 $43.89 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 6.1% 59.5% 18.0% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 21 31 52 Ridership per Capita 1.1 0.5 1.6 Other Data Population 110,780 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $137,136 Local Funds $392,921 State Funds $780,436 Federal Funds $938,852 Other Funds $1,993,890 TOTAL: $4,243,235 Note: FRTA expenses may be allocated incorrectly between fixed-route and demand response accounting policies were subsequently revised.

Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority (GATRA) Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 746,300 188,800 935,100 Basic Data Derived Data Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,875,200 1,080,600 2,955,800 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 86,700 76,200 162,900 Operating Expense (OE) $6,332,400 $4,113,100 $10,445,500 Fare Revenue ($) $1,828,410 $205,410 $2,033,820 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $2.45 $1.09 $2.17 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $8.49 $21.79 $11.17 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.98 $0.19 $0.69 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $3.38 $3.81 $3.53 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $21.09 $2.70 $12.49 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $73.04 $53.98 $64.12 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 28.9% 5.0% 19.5% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 49 62 111 Ridership per Capita 7.6 1.9 9.5 Other Data Population 98,175 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $2,033,800 Local Funds $2,361,600 State Funds $2,522,800 Federal Funds $3,234,200 Other Funds $632,500 TOTAL: $10,784,900

Lowell Regional Transit Authority (LRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 1,308,500 96,200 1,404,700 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,115,200 449,900 1,565,100 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 73,500 35,900 109,400 Operating Expense (OE) $7,069,700 $1,499,000 $8,568,700 Fare Revenue ($) $938,400 $108,657 $1,047,057 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.72 $1.13 $0.75 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $5.40 $15.58 $6.10 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.84 $0.24 $0.67 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $6.34 $3.33 $5.47 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $12.77 $3.03 $9.57 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $96.19 $41.75 $78.32 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 13.3% 7.2% 12.2% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 47 28 75 Ridership per Capita 4.1 0.3 4.4 Other Data Population 320,301 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,047,000 Local Funds $1,712,400 State Funds $2,781,900 Federal Funds $2,029,000 Other Funds $1,279,000 TOTAL: $8,849,300

Martha's Vineyard Regional Transit Authority (VTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 1,031,197 13,739 1,044,936 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 858,546 76,752 935,298 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 57,253 5,214 62,467 Operating Expense (OE) $3,069,923 $439,405 $3,509,328 Fare Revenue ($) $1,166,986 $13,369 $1,180,355 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $1.13 $0.97 $1.13 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $2.98 $31.98 $3.36 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $1.36 $0.17 $1.26 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $3.58 $5.72 $3.75 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $20.38 $2.56 $18.90 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $53.62 $84.27 $56.18 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 38.0% 3.0% 33.6% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 30 5 35 Ridership per Capita 66.4 0.9 67.3 Other Data Population 15,527 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,166,986 Local Funds $741,002 State Funds $1,199,869 Federal Funds $550,000 Other Funds $152,809 TOTAL: $3,810,666

Merrimack Valley Regional Transit Authority (MVRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 2,162,200 48,500 2,210,700 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,508,400 381,100 1,889,500 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 122,600 32,000 154,600 Operating Expense (OE) $9,850,500 $1,365,400 $11,215,900 Fare Revenue ($) $1,167,515 $133,130 $1,300,645 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.54 $2.74 $0.59 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $4.56 $28.15 $5.07 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.77 $0.35 $0.69 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $6.53 $3.58 $5.94 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $9.52 $4.16 $8.41 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $80.35 $42.67 $72.55 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 11.9% 9.8% 11.6% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 52 20 72 Ridership per Capita 7.1 0.2 7.2 Other Data Population 306,339 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,300,600 Local Funds $1,957,900 State Funds $5,566,100 Federal Funds $2,387,800 Other Funds $472,800 TOTAL: $11,685,200

MetroWest Regional Transit Authority (MWRTA) Basic Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 497,400 9,300 506,700 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 492,500 40,000 532,500 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 42,000 5,800 47,800 Operating Expense (OE) $2,155,200 $2,141,100 $4,296,300 Fare Revenue ($) $488,145 $144,056 $632,201 Derived Data Other Data Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.98 $15.49 $1.25 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $4.33 $230.23 $8.48 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.99 $3.60 $1.19 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $4.38 $53.53 $8.07 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $11.62 $24.84 $13.23 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $51.31 $369.16 $89.88 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 22.6% 6.7% 14.7% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 10 11 21 Ridership per Capita 2.2 0.0 2.2 Population 231,198 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $632,200 Local Funds $951,900 State Funds $2,221,200 Federal Funds $0 Other Funds $491,000 TOTAL: $4,296,300 Note: MWRTA fixed-route ridership (UPT) may be lower than shown, which would affect other values that are calculated from UPT as well. MWRTA has requested that NTD revise the data. Future reports will reflect this change.

Montachusett Regional Transit Authority (MART) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 602,200 282,400 884,600 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 825,700 1,345,800 2,171,500 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 67,000 110,200 177,200 Operating Expense (OE) $6,165,500 $3,807,500 $9,973,000 Fare Revenue ($) $745,763 $513,394 $1,259,157 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $1.24 $1.82 $1.42 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $10.24 $13.48 $11.27 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $0.90 $0.38 $0.58 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $7.47 $2.83 $4.59 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $11.13 $4.66 $7.11 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $92.02 $34.55 $56.28 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 12.1% 13.5% 12.6% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 31 129 160 Ridership per Capita 3.1 1.5 4.6 Other Data Population 193,415 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,785,000 Local Funds $1,543,700 State Funds $4,631,000 Federal Funds $1,579,800 Other Funds $827,200 TOTAL: $10,366,700

Nantucket Regional Transit Authority (NRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 251,008 10,045 261,053 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 192,737 32,805 225,542 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 17,009 3,817 20,826 Operating Expense (OE) $1,391,497 $201,462 $1,592,959 Fare Revenue ($) $363,576 $8,727 $372,303 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $1.45 $0.87 $1.43 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $5.54 $20.06 $6.10 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $1.89 $0.27 $1.65 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $7.22 $6.14 $7.06 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $21.38 $2.29 $17.88 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $81.81 $52.78 $76.49 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 26.1% 4.3% 23.4% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 17 4 21 Ridership per Capita 22.4 0.9 23.3 Other Data Population 11,215 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $363,576 Local Funds $304,129 State Funds $438,428 Federal Funds $464,745 Other Funds $22,081 TOTAL: $1,592,959

Pioneer Valley Transit Authority (PVTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 11,741,400 308,800 12,050,200 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 4,161,900 3,301,800 7,463,700 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 325,300 191,800 517,100 Operating Expense (OE) $28,282,600 $7,761,300 $36,043,900 Fare Revenue ($) $4,982,049 $491,739 $5,473,788 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.42 $1.59 $0.45 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $2.41 $25.13 $2.99 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $1.20 $0.15 $0.73 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $6.80 $2.35 $4.83 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $15.32 $2.56 $10.59 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $86.94 $40.47 $69.70 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 17.6% 6.3% 15.2% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 179 140 319 Ridership per Capita 21.3 0.6 21.8 Other Data Population 551,543 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $5,473,800 Local Funds $6,092,700 State Funds $19,581,300 Federal Funds $5,503,200 Other Funds $869,800 TOTAL: $37,520,800 Note: PVTA states that their State Funds should be revised to $17,289,783. They have requested that NTD make the revision.

Southeastern Regional Transit Authority (SRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 1,611,000 89,700 1,700,700 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,222,400 499,600 1,722,000 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 95,200 47,700 142,900 Operating Expense (OE) $9,552,700 $2,482,100 $12,034,800 Fare Revenue ($) $1,226,109 $525,475 $1,751,584 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.76 $5.86 $1.03 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $5.93 $27.67 $7.08 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $1.00 $1.05 $1.02 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $7.81 $4.97 $6.99 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $12.88 $11.02 $12.26 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $100.34 $52.04 $84.22 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 12.8% 21.2% 14.6% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 59 24 83 Ridership per Capita 8.6 0.5 9.1 Other Data Population 186,731 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $1,751,600 Local Funds $1,564,100 State Funds $4,463,700 Federal Funds $4,031,800 Other Funds $223,700 TOTAL: $12,034,900

Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) Basic Data Derived Data Fixed Route Demand Response Total Ridership (UPT) 3,102,400 260,000 3,362,400 Veh Rev Miles (VRM) 1,568,200 1,503,700 3,071,900 Veh Rev Hrs (VRH) 136,000 117,900 253,900 Operating Expense (OE) $14,089,600 $5,163,500 $19,253,100 Fare Revenue ($) $2,243,355 $312,337 $2,555,692 Fare Revenue per Trip ($/UPT) $0.72 $1.20 $0.76 Op Expense per Trip (OE/UPT) $4.54 $19.86 $5.73 Fare Revenue per Mile ($/VRM) $1.43 $0.21 $0.83 Op Expense per Mile (OE/VRM) $8.98 $3.43 $6.27 Fare Revenue per Hour ($/VRH) $16.50 $2.65 $10.07 Op Expense per Hour (OE/VRH) $103.60 $43.80 $75.83 Fare Recovery Ratio ($/OE) 15.9% 6.0% 13.3% Veh Available for Max Service (VAM) 46 115 161 Ridership per Capita 5.9 0.5 6.4 Other Data Population 524,725 Sources of Operating Funds Fare Revenues $2,555,700 Local Funds $3,327,300 State Funds $9,059,000 Federal Funds $4,856,500 Other Funds $310,800 TOTAL: $20,109,300