DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience

Similar documents
Date: 11/6/15. Total Passengers

Transit Performance Report FY (JUNE 30, 2007)

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

Board Box. February Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators M. Thompson Financial Report for Dec H.

Att. A, AI 46, 11/9/17

Sound Transit Operations August 2015 Service Performance Report. Ridership

TTI REVIEW OF FARE POLICY: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs CTAA Expo June 2014

Quarterly Report Transit Bureau, Local Transit Operations. First Quarter, Fiscal Year 2015 (July 2014 September 2014) ART & STAR

ADA PARATRANSIT PLAN. Twin Cities Area Transportation Authority 275 East Wall Benton Harbor, MI 49022

FY Transit Needs Assessment. Ventura County Transportation Commission

ESCAMBIA COUNTY AREA TRANSIT MTAC REPORT

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE Actual

Regional Fare Change Overview. Nick Eull Senior Manager of Revenue Operations Metro Transit

Bristol Virginia Transit

WESTERN EL DORADO COUNTY SHORT AND LONG-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Executive Summary

Board of Directors Information Summary

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Sound Transit Operations December 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (MVRTA) PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FIXED ROUTE

Chapter 3. Burke & Company

Factors that Affect Fixed-Route Ridership Frequency Connections and accessibility Travel time Travel cost Service area coverage Reliability

Sound Transit Operations January 2014 Service Performance Report. Ridership

2 YORK REGION TRANSIT MOBILITY PLUS 2004 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REVIEW

METROBUS SERVICE GUIDELINES

STEP ALTERNATIVES RANKING TABLE

Why we re here: For educational purposes only

September 2014 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Sub-Regional Report PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Existing Services, Ridership, and Standards Report. June 2018

Bus Operations Report

METROLIFT RESOURCE NOTEBOOK

Sound Transit Operations March 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

* Data for prior months has been updated to reflect error corrections from missing passenger count data

APPENDIX B COMMUTER BUS FAREBOX POLICY PEER REVIEW

Transit Commission. Tax Supported Programs

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

Demand-Responsive Transportation in the TCQSM

CURRENT SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLANNING PRACTICE. 1. SRTP -- Definition & Introduction 2. Measures and Standards

REVIEW OF SUN METRO LIFT SERVICES

Laredo Transit Development Plan

Sound Transit Operations March 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Sound Transit Operations January 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Sound Transit Operations January 2017 Service Performance Report. Ridership. Total Boardings by Mode

Fare Policy Discussion Background and History

Sound Transit Operations February 2018 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Administrative Operations Report

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

Sound Transit Operations June 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

EL PASO COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSIT INSTITUTIONAL OPTIONS ASSESSMENT STUDY

Final Report. Regional ADA Paratransit and Dial-A-Ride Service Plan

SANTA MONICA AIRPORT VISIONING PROCESS: PHASE III FINDINGS AND NEXT STEP RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL 30, 2013

SUB-REGIONAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

ADA Paratransit Requirements

TRI-COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FOR SENIORS AND/OR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MONTHLY PERFORMANCE REPORTS

PERFORMANCE REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

ACSP 57th Annual Conference Denver, Colorado, October 2017 TRACK 14 TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING

NORTHERN NAPA VALLEY TRANSIT STUDY

PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER Performance Management Office

Scorecard Key Performance Indicators

YRT/VIVA PROPOSED FARE INCREASE

About This Report GAUGE INDICATOR. Red. Orange. Green. Gold

Board Box. October Item # Item Staff Page 1. Key Performance Indicators Sep 2018 M. Mungia Financial Report Aug 2018 H.

APPENDIX B. Arlington Transit Peer Review Technical Memorandum

St. Johns County Transit Development Plan Update

Paratransit Bus Services Guide

DRAFT Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April June 2016

UK Experience with Bus Restructuring

RTD s Performance Management System

Performance Measures Year End Updated-

Preliminary Fare Increase Proposal Spokane Transit Authority. Public Outreach April and May 2016

October REGIONAL ROUTE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

PUBLIC TRANSIT IN KENOSHA, RACINE, AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES

Public Meeting. December 19 th, 2018

Appendix A: Regional Fare Policy, SANDAG

Establishes a fare structure for Tacoma Link light rail, to be implemented in September 2014.

Chapter 3: Current Transit Conditions

Service Performance 2010 Networked Family of Services

Fiscal Management and Control Board. Fare Policy October 16, Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only

Follow-up to Proposed Fare Changes for FY2013

Service Performance 2013 Networked Family of Services

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Monthly Performance Report

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

MUSKEGON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM PROPOSAL FOR FARE AND SERVICE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE PHASED IN BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2018

Fare Revenue Report 2016 FARE REVENUE REPORT

OCTA s ACCESS Service The Way to Go!!!!

TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS. Presented by: Gaylene Burkett Community Development Department

LA Metro Rapid - Considerations in Identifying BRT Corridors. Martha Butler LACMTA, Transportation Planning Manager Los Angeles, California

Presentation Outline

MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015

ATTACHMENT A.7. Transit Division Performance Measurements Report Fiscal Year Fourth Quarter

Regional ADA Paratransit and Dial-A-Ride Service Plan. Final Report

Matt Miller, Planning Manager Margaret Heath-Schoep, Paratransit & Special Projects Manager

SRTA Year End Fixed Route Ridership Analysis: FY 2018

GOLDEN CRESCENT REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

City of Murfreesboro. Transit Service and Management Alternatives

MONTHLY REPORT JUNE 2017

Implementation Guidelines and Performance Measures Special Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities (Paratransit) Program

MONTHLY REPORT SEPTEMBER 2017

Houston Regional Transit: Fare Structures (effective March 2015)

Mobility Services. Rider s Guide

Transcription:

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience FOR ANYBODY GOING ANYWHER IN LA HABRA International Conference on Demand Responsive Transportation Breckenridge, Colorado September 2016

DRT Performance Measurement: The Early Years Performance Measures for Dial-A-Ride Service Passengers per hour Passengers per mile Wait time Wait time deviation Ride time Complaints Road calls Accidents 2

DRT Performance Measures: The Many Table 4-1: Common Performance Measures Used For DRT* Operating Cost per Passenger Trip Operating Cost per Vehicle Hour Operating Cost per Vehicle Mile Operating Cost per Passenger Mile Passenger Revenue per Total Operating Cost (Farebox Recovery Ratio) Passenger Trips per Vehicle Hour Passenger Trips per Vehicle Mile Accidents per 100,000 Vehicle Miles No-Shows per Scheduled Trips On-Time Pick-Ups to Total Pick-Ups (On-Time Performance) Complaints per 1,000 Passenger Trips Average Trip Length Average Vehicle Travel Time System Speed Response Time (As measured by the minimum time between when service is requested and when provided) Trip Denials per Trips Requested * From TCRP Report 124 3

DRT Performance Measurement: ADA Paratransit ADA Service Criteria, Ensuring Comparability 1. Service Area: Service must be provided in ¾-mile corridors around bus routes and rail stations. 2. Reservations: Trip reservations for any particular day must be taken during business hours on the day before, and, optionally, up to 14 days in advance. 3. Fares. The fare can be no more than twice the non-discounted fare for fixed route service. 4. Trip purpose. There can be no restrictions or priorities based on trip purpose. 5. Hours and days of service. Service must be provided during the same hours and days as the fixed route service. 6. Capacity constraints. Service must be provided without capacity constraints, meaning no waiting lists for service, trip caps, or pattern or practices of a substantial number of trip denials, untimely pick-ups, or excessively long trips Performance Measures To Ensure Compliance Trip denials Missed trips On-time performance Travel time (on-board trip length) Telephone availability for trip reservations (hold time, etc.) 4

DRT Performance Measurement: Typology of Systems Table 5-2: TYPOLOGY OF DRT SYSTEMS * Small Urban DRT Systems 50,000 up to 200,000 Population ADA Paratransit Only Limited Eligibility DRT General Public DRT Large Urban DRT Systems 200,000-1 Million Population ADA Paratransit Only Other DRT Largest Urban DRT Systems Over 1 Million Population ADA Paratransit Only Other DRT 5

5.00 Small Urban DRT Systems: Passenger Trips Per Revenue Hour 4.70 4.00 3.84 4.04 3.57 3.91 3.00 2.00 3.32* 3.08 2.61 1.77 2.45 2.30 2.25 1.76* 2.92 1.00 0.00 ADA Only Limited Eligibility General Public *Adjusted Figure Type of DRT System 6

Largest Urban DRT Systems: Passenger Trips Per Revenue Hour 5.00 4.00 4.35 3.00 2.00 1.00 2.34 1.95 1.97 1.98 1.84 1.84 1.53 1.45 1.28 2.37 1.81 1.49 0.00 ADA Only Other/Limited Eligibility Type of DRT System 7

Largest Urban DRT Systems: Operating Cost Per Passenger Trip $45.00 $40.00 $35.00 $30.00 $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $40.31 $39.62* $36.07 $32.36 $31.72 $26.28 $21.11 $26.20 $23.94* $23.41 $23.43* $17.39 $15.56* $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 ADA Only Type of DRT System Other/Limited Eligibility 8

Measuring Performance: Data? National Transit Database (NTD) Established by Congress in 1974 Repository of data on the financial, operating and asset condition of US transit agencies Who reports: Transit agencies receiving funds from the Federal grant programs for urban and rural transit 660+ transit agencies submit data Data products: Transit profiles: Frequently sought data on any transit provider National transit summaries and trends Time series data on transit systems dating back to 1991 Up-to-date time series of monthly ridership data Time series of safety data 9

DRT Performance Measurement: the U.S. Experience Current Focus: Sustainable? A Large Urban Transit Agency s ADA Paratransit Service: 2015 Baseline and 2025 Forecast 2015 Ridership 2015 Operating Cost 2025 Ridership 2025 Operating Cost 2.2 M $98 M 3.1 M $168.4 M Towards Sustainability: Small Sample of Options Demand management Bus stop and pedestrian infrastructure improvements Travel training Trip-by-trip eligibility enforcement Leverage human service agencies Vehicles Subsidy Cost reduction Non-dedicated providers (taxis, others) 10